Self Report Measures

Similar documents
Reliability AND Validity. Fact checking your instrument

Lecture Week 3 Quality of Measurement Instruments; Introduction SPSS

Do not write your name on this examination all 40 best

AP Psychology -- Chapter 02 Review Research Methods in Psychology

ATTITUDE SCALES. Dr. Sudip Chaudhuri. M. Sc., M. Tech., Ph.D. (Sc.) (SINP / Cal), M. Ed. Assistant Professor (Stage-3) / Reader


11-3. Learning Objectives

Associate Prof. Dr Anne Yee. Dr Mahmoud Danaee

Guidelines for using the Voils two-part measure of medication nonadherence

Must be the music: Validation of a theory-based survey

Importance of Good Measurement

Multiple Act criterion:

Communication Research Practice Questions

MBA 609 Organizational Behaviour. Week 8 Conflict Management and Negotiations

By Hui Bian Office for Faculty Excellence

Emotional Intelligence Assessment Technical Report

University of Warwick institutional repository:

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD. method the major components include: Research Design, Research Site and

Validity and Reliability. PDF Created with deskpdf PDF Writer - Trial ::

Self Compassion and Emotional Intelligence of Engineering and Dental College Students

Reliability and Validity

Career Counseling and Services: A Cognitive Information Processing Approach

CHAPTER 3 METHOD AND PROCEDURE

TECH 646 Analysis of Research in Industry and Technology

Georgina Salas. Topics EDCI Intro to Research Dr. A.J. Herrera

Validity refers to the accuracy of a measure. A measurement is valid when it measures what it is suppose to measure and performs the functions that

Psych 1Chapter 2 Overview

The measurement of media literacy in eating disorder risk factor research: psychometric properties of six measures

Methodology Introduction of the study Statement of Problem Objective Hypothesis Method

Developing and Testing Survey Items

Measurement page 1. Measurement

Empowered by Psychometrics The Fundamentals of Psychometrics. Jim Wollack University of Wisconsin Madison

Collecting & Making Sense of

Everything DiSC 363 for Leaders. Research Report. by Inscape Publishing

50 Scales LIKERT SCALE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL SCALE A GENERAL NOTE ON SCALE FORMAT OTHER OPTIONS

Sampling for Success. Dr. Jim Mirabella President, Mirabella Research Services, Inc. Professor of Research & Statistics

VARIABLES AND MEASUREMENT

ALABAMA SELF-ASSESSMENT INDEX PILOT PROGRAM SUMMARY REPORT

Survey Research. We can learn a lot simply by asking people what we want to know... THE PREVALENCE OF SURVEYS IN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH

Topic #2. A key criterion in evaluating any test, measure, or piece of research is validity.

Survey Question. What are appropriate methods to reaffirm the fairness, validity reliability and general performance of examinations?


CAUTIONS ABOUT THE PRACTICE EXAM

Validity. Ch. 5: Validity. Griggs v. Duke Power - 2. Griggs v. Duke Power (1971)

Variables in Research. What We Will Cover in This Section. What Does Variable Mean?

In search of the correct answer in an ability-based Emotional Intelligence (EI) test * Tamara Mohoric. Vladimir Taksic.

The Current State of Our Education

MEASUREMENT THEORY 8/15/17. Latent Variables. Measurement Theory. How do we measure things that aren t material?

Validity. Ch. 5: Validity. Griggs v. Duke Power - 2. Griggs v. Duke Power (1971)

Types of Tests. Measurement Reliability. Most self-report tests used in Psychology and Education are objective tests :

A new scale (SES) to measure engagement with community mental health services

Validity of measurement instruments used in PT research

The Prejudice towards People with Mental Illness (PPMI) scale: structure and validity

Summary Report: The Effectiveness of Online Ads: A Field Experiment

Measurement of Resilience Barbara Resnick, PHD,CRNP

MEASUREMENT, SCALING AND SAMPLING. Variables

Gambling Pathways Questionnaire (GPQ)

The Relationship of Competitiveness and Achievement Orientation to Participation in Sport and Nonsport Activities

The happy personality: Mediational role of trait emotional intelligence

ʻThe concept of Deaf identity in Sloveniaʼ

ADMS Sampling Technique and Survey Studies

Introduction to Reliability

Psychological testing

I. Survey Methodology

Title: The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Texting While Driving Behavior in College Students MS # Manuscript ID GCPI

WEISS FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT RATING SCALES (WFIRS) SELF REPORT RATING SCALE

Key words: State-Trait Anger, Anger Expression, Anger Control, FSTAXI-2, reliability, validity.

2 Types of psychological tests and their validity, precision and standards

A scale to measure locus of control of behaviour

Everything DiSC Manual

AQ Intervention for Assessing and Counseling Students of Color

Quality of Life Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults (QoL-AGHDA)

THE USE OF CRONBACH ALPHA RELIABILITY ESTIMATE IN RESEARCH AMONG STUDENTS IN PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES IN GHANA.

Reliability. Internal Reliability

Doctoral Dissertation Boot Camp Quantitative Methods Kamiar Kouzekanani, PhD January 27, The Scientific Method of Problem Solving

Continuum Specification in Construct Validation

Toward a Comprehensive Measure of Hope

Huber, Gregory A. and John S. Lapinski "The "Race Card" Revisited: Assessing Racial Priming in

Handout 5: Establishing the Validity of a Survey Instrument

The complete Insight Technical Manual includes a comprehensive section on validity. INSIGHT Inventory 99.72% % % Mean

CHAPTER 3. Research Methodology

Ch. 11 Measurement. Measurement

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 140 ( 2014 ) PSYSOC 2013

ACDI. An Inventory of Scientific Findings. (ACDI, ACDI-Corrections Version and ACDI-Corrections Version II) Provided by:

Saville Consulting Wave Professional Styles Handbook

II. Measurement Validity. A. Validity and Reliability Hitting the Target

Emotional Intelligence and Leadership

Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) Tools for Measurement of Health Related Quality of Life

Measuring Perceived Social Support in Mexican American Youth: Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support

Reliability & Validity Dr. Sudip Chaudhuri

Designing a Questionnaire

Personal Listening Profile Research Report

ORIGINS AND DISCUSSION OF EMERGENETICS RESEARCH

PÄIVI KARHU THE THEORY OF MEASUREMENT

THOMAS R. STEWAB'P University of Illinoh

In 2013, a group of researchers published a paper evaluating the construct

Demonstrating validity

Preliminary Conclusion

Psychometric Properties of Farsi Version State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (FSTAXI-2)

Transcription:

Self Report Measures I. Measuring Self-Report Variables A. The Survey Research Method - Many participants are randomly (e.g. stratified random sampling) or otherwise (nonprobablility sampling) p.140-146 - Provide Self reports of Behaviors, Feelings (current emotional states), Attitudes, and/or Personality Constructs 1

1. Methodological Validity - Internal Validity - Low (this is correlational data) - External Validity - Generalizability to Population = High (potentially) : Large Random Samples - Generalizability to other Settings - Mundane realism = Low - Experimental realism = Low - Pyschological realism = should be high 2. Strengths - -More generalizable to the population as whole (external validity) -though, difficult and expensive to collect truly random samples -often use: stratified samples: randomly sample subgroups of the population cluster sampling: Id clusters, and randomly draw clusters 2

3. Problems with Survey Research a. Information is less detailed than Observational and Case Study methods b. It is correlational research = Low Internal Validity (cause/effect relationships can not be established) c. Response style(set) Response Acquiescence - saying yes Response Deviation - saying no Social Desirability- not wanting to look bad or be uncooperative. (Crown Marlow Scale) - Self Deceptive Positivity - Impression Management d. Volunteer Problems: -people who want to participate (agree to participate) in research may be different from people who refuse. -more intelligent -better educated -more cooperative -better adjusted -desire more social approval 3

B. Psychometric Scaling & Self-Report Methods: 1. Psychometric Scaling: Definition - developed between 1915ish - 1930 s. - measure mental phenomenon with no clearly identifiable external cause, but the experience can be reported by the individual. - (e.g. feelings, beliefs, Intelligence and other mental processes). 4

2. Summative Scales: Measures of attitudes and/or personality dimensions based on ratings of a series of statements selected to represent a specific topic. - Typically these scales use Numerical Rating Scales on a 5 or 7 pt scales Agreement: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor disagree Agree Strongly Agree Endorsement: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Very Much Unlike Me Unlike Me Somewhat Unlike Me Neither Like Me nor Not Like Me Somewhat Like Me Like Me Very Much Like Me 5

The response numbers from all the items comprising a scale are summed and averaged. Example: Bloom County No Freaks Measure of Freakiness 1. I like limber Eskimos. 2. It is ok for a person to have one or many tattoos. 3. I would associate with people who gargle Windex 4. I would consider purchasing a Barry Manilow inflatable doll. 5. It is acceptable to sleep with large tomatoes 6. I feel that snake wrestling in Jell-O pudding is an acceptable social activity. - Ideally, - half the items are worded in the affirmative - (agreeing indicates more positive attitudes toward freaks) - half the items are worded in the negative - (disagreeing indicates more positive attitudes toward freaks). - Reverse Worded items must be reverse scored. Balanced Example: Reverse scored items = 8 score. 1s become 7s, 2s become 6s, 3s become 4s, etc. 6

The response numbers from all the items comprising a scale are summed and averaged. Example: Bloom County No Freaks Measure of Freakiness Score Reverse Score 1. I like limber Eskimos. 2. It is inappropriate for a person to have one or many tattoos. 3. I would associate with people who gargle Windex 4. I would not consider purchasing a Barry Manilow inflatable doll. 5. It is acceptable to sleep with large tomatoes 6. I feel that snake wrestling in Jell-O pudding is an unacceptable social activity. C. Measurement Reliability: The consistency of a measure. 1. Consistency Across Time Test-Retest: - Give test at two points in time. - High positive correlations indicates good Test-Retest Reliability (usually about.50 over 3 months is average). - Not all psychological phenomena are expected to be stable. - Traits = e.g., personality variables - States = e.g., transient moods. - Problem of Practice Effects / Testing Effects - Increase in performance due to item familiarity (abilities, knowledge, and performance tests). - Solution = Parallel Forms 7

2. Consistency Across Items Internal Consistency: (Cronbach s Alpha) - correlate all items in a scale with each other (item intercorrelations). - All items should be responded to consistently (highly correlated). - Adequate Consistency = (alpha) α >.70 - Don t confuse Cronbach α with Type I error α. D. Measurement Validity - Does the measure assess what it should - A measure must be reliable in order for it to be valid (reliability is a necessary, but not sufficient, criteria for validity) 1. Content Validity (Face Validity) - Does a measure contain the information it is supposed to a - Representativeness = are all the relevant domains/dimensions/constructs represented. - Have experts and lay persons develop list: eyeball it b - Relevance = are irrelevant domains / dimensions / constructs excluded. -experts eyeball it 8

3. Construct Validity: - Does the measure actually assess the theoretical construct that it is intended to. a. Convergent Validity = Is the measure correlated (associated) with other measures that it is expected to based on theory. - e.g. - Dog Liking should be associated with more general attitudes toward animals - Attitude toward Cheezy Poofs should be associated with other snack food attitudes. - Attitudes with Freakiness should be negatively associated with Disgust Sensitivity, Dogmatism, and Conservatism b. Discriminant Validity: Is the measure uncorrelated with other measures that theory says it should not be related to. If the measure was strongly related to an established and theoretically unrelated construct it would call into question the meaning of the new measure. e.g., - Dog Liking should not be associated with Social Desirability, Political Attitudes (Conservatism vs. Liberalness), or Dogmatism. - Attitude toward Cheezy Poofs should not be associated with social desirability or disgust sensitivity. - Freakiness should not be associated with extroversion, agreeableness, or neuroticism. 9