They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

Similar documents
They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

NICE guideline Published: 20 July 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ng52

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 30 August 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta472

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

Choosing and delivering ering interventions entions for

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 31 January 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta502

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 25 January 2012 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta243

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

NICE guideline Published: 10 February 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ng36

Update: Non-Hodgkin s Lymphoma

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 26 February 2014 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta306

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Clinical guideline Published: 23 February 2009 nice.org.uk/guidance/cg81

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 28 June 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta446

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 28 September 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta411

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 18 July 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta531

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 29 June 2011 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta227

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 18 April 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta518

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 28 March 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta516

Policy for Central Nervous System [CNS] Prophylaxis in Lymphoid Malignancies

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 8 November 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta487

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 7 February 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta505

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 6 September 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta476

Obinutuzumab in combination with bendamustine for treating rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 9 August 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta465

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 21 November 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta546

Putting NICE guidance into practice

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 16 May 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta520

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 20 December 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta496

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 24 January 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta500

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 27 January 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta380

CPAG Summary Report for Clinical Panel Policy 1630 Bendamustine-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in adults

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 26 April 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta442

Clinical Commissioning Policy Proposition: Bendamustine with rituximab for relapsed indolent non-hodgkin s lymphoma (all ages)

NICE guideline Published: 24 January 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ng83

Clinical guideline Published: 13 June 2012 nice.org.uk/guidance/cg141

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 28 June 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta448

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 27 March 2019 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta572

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 24 January 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta499

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 23 November 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta418

Rituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III-IV follicular lymphoma

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 11 April 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta517

Smoking cessation interventions and services

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 16 December 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta370

Pancreatic Cancer in adults:

Strategies for the Treatment of Elderly DLBCL Patients, New Combination Therapy in NHL, and Maintenance Rituximab Therapy in FL

Alcohol interventions in secondary and further education

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 28 November 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta547

Clinical guideline Published: 17 March 2008 nice.org.uk/guidance/cg64

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 12 July 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta456

Clinical guideline Published: 27 June 2012 nice.org.uk/guidance/cg143

Risk assessment for type 2 diabetes

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 31 August 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta473

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 22 July 2009 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta174

NICE guideline Published: 10 February 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ng36

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 9 August 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta466

Lancashire and South Cumbria Haematology NSSG Guidelines for Follicular Lymphoma:

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 28 October 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta359

Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Midostaurin for untreated acute myeloid leukaemia

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Temsirolimus (Torisel) for mantle cell lymphoma - relapsed and/or refractory. January 2008

Indolent Lymphomas. Dr. Melissa Toupin The Ottawa Hospital

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 6 December 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta493

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 21 February 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta507

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 11 October 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta480

brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris ) 50mg powder for concentrate for solution for infusion SMC No. (845/12) Takeda UK Ltd

LYMPHOMA Joginder Singh, MD Medical Oncologist, Mercy Cancer Center

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 26 October 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta416

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 24 August 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta405

12 th Annual Hematology & Breast Cancer Update Update in Lymphoma

Transcription:

bring together everything NICE says on a topic in an interactive flowchart. are interactive and designed to be used online. They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see: http://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/non-hodgkins-lymphoma NICE Pathway last updated: 20 March 2018 This document contains a single flowchart and uses numbering to link the boxes to the associated recommendations. Page 1 of 10

Page 2 of 10

1 Person aged 16 or over with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma No additional information 2 Central nervous system prophylaxis Explain to people with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that they have an increased risk of central nervous system lymphoma if the testis, breast, adrenal gland or kidney is affected. Explain to people with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that they may have an increased risk of central nervous system lymphoma if they have 2 or more of the following factors: elevated lactate dehydrogenase age over 60 years poor performance status (ECOG score of 2 or more) more than one extranodal site involved stage III or IV disease. Explain that the level of risk increases with the number of factors involved. Offer central nervous system-directed prophylactic therapy to people with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: that affects the testis, breast, adrenal gland or kidney or who have 4 or 5 of the factors associated with increased risk of central nervous system relapse listed above. Consider central nervous system-directed prophylactic therapy for people with diffuse large B- cell lymphoma who have 2 or 3 of the factors associated with increased risk of central nervous system relapse listed above. 3 Radiotherapy after first-line immunochemotherapy Consider consolidation radiotherapy delivering 30 Gy to sites involved with bulk disease at diagnosis for people with advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that has responded to first-line immunochemotherapy. For each person, balance the possible late effects of radiotherapy with the possible increased need for salvage therapy if it is omitted, and discuss the options with them. Page 3 of 10

4 When to offer fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-ct imaging Do not routinely offer FDG-PET-CT imaging for interim assessment during treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Offer FDG-PET-CT imaging to assess response at completion of planned treatment for people with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Consider FDG-PET-CT imaging to assess response to treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for people with high-grade non-hodgkin's lymphoma. 5 Salvage therapy Multi-agent immunochemotherapy Offer salvage therapy with multi-agent immunochemotherapy to people with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are fit enough to tolerate intensive therapy: explain that this is primarily to obtain sufficient response to allow consolidation with autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation, but is also beneficial even if not followed by transplantation consider R-GDP immunochemotherapy, which is as effective as other commonly used salvage regimens and less toxic. Stem cell transplantation Offer consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation to people with chemosensitive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (that is, there has been at least a partial response to chemotherapy) who are fit enough for transplantation. Consider consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplantation for people with chemosensitive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (that is, there has been at least a partial response to chemotherapy): that relapses after autologous stem cell transplantation or in whom stem cell harvesting is not possible. Page 4 of 10

Pixantrone monotherapy The following recommendations are from NICE technology appraisal guidance on pixantrone monotherapy for treating multiply relapsed or refractory aggressive non-hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma. Pixantrone monotherapy is recommended as an option for treating adults with multiply relapsed or refractory aggressive non-hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma only if: the person has previously been treated with rituximab and the person is receiving third- or fourth-line treatment and the manufacturer provides pixantrone with the discount agreed in the patient access scheme. People currently receiving treatment initiated within the NHS with pixantrone monotherapy that is not recommended for them by NICE in this guidance should be able to continue treatment until they and their NHS clinician consider it appropriate to stop. NICE has written information for the public on pixantrone. 6 Follow-up For people in complete remission after first-line treatment with curative intent for diffuse large B- cell lymphoma: offer regular clinical assessment consider stopping regular clinical assessment aimed at detecting relapse 3 years after completing treatment for people in ongoing complete remission offer urgent appointments to people who experience a recurrence of lymphoma symptoms or new symptoms that suggest disease relapse do not offer lactate dehydrogenase surveillance for detecting relapse do not offer routine surveillance imaging (including chest X-ray, CT and PET-CT) for detecting relapse in people who are asymptomatic. Quality standards The following quality statement is relevant to this part of the interactive flowchart. 4. End-of-treatment summary plan Page 5 of 10

7 Monitoring after treatment See Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma/non-hodgkin's lymphoma overview /Monitoring after treatment Page 6 of 10

Why we made the recommendations on obinutuzumab Current first-line treatment for symptomatic advanced follicular lymphoma is induction therapy with rituximab plus chemotherapy, followed by maintenance treatment with rituximab when there has been a response to induction therapy. The main evidence on the effectiveness and safety of obinutuzumab is from an ongoing clinical trial. It shows that obinutuzumab plus chemotherapy followed by obinutuzumab maintenance treatment delays disease progression more than current treatment. However, it also shows that undesirable side effects are more common with obinutuzumab than with rituximab. There are not enough data to know with certainty whether obinutuzumab increases life expectancy. The company's revised economic analyses focuses on higher-risk subgroups. Obinutuzumab costs more than branded rituximab and even more than the biosimilar versions of rituximab. However, using the preferred assumptions and the discounted prices for obinutuzumab and rituximab, the cost-effectiveness estimate for obinutuzumab plus chemotherapy followed by obinutuzumab maintenance treatment, compared with rituximab plus chemotherapy followed by rituximab maintenance treatment, is lower than 30,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Therefore, obinutuzumab is recommended as an option for untreated advanced follicular lymphoma in patients at higher risk. For more information see the committee discussion in the NICE technology appraisal on obinutuzumab for untreated advanced follicular lymphoma. Glossary CHOP cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone CVP cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone FISH fluorescence in situ hybridisation Page 7 of 10

FDG-PET-CT fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-ct H. pylori Helicobacter pylori MALT mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue PET-CT positron emission tomography-ct Sources Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: diagnosis and management (2016) NICE guideline NG52 Pixantrone monotherapy for treating multiply relapsed or refractory aggressive non-hodgkin's B- cell lymphoma (2014) NICE technology appraisal guidance 306 Your responsibility Guidelines The recommendations in this guideline represent the view of NICE, arrived at after careful consideration of the evidence available. When exercising their judgement, professionals and practitioners are expected to take this guideline fully into account, alongside the individual needs, preferences and values of their patients or the people using their service. It is not mandatory to apply the recommendations, and the guideline does not override the responsibility to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the individual, in consultation with them and their families and carers or guardian. Local commissioners and providers of healthcare have a responsibility to enable the guideline to be applied when individual professionals and people using services wish to use it. They Page 8 of 10

should do so in the context of local and national priorities for funding and developing services, and in light of their duties to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination, to advance equality of opportunity and to reduce health inequalities. Nothing in this guideline should be interpreted in a way that would be inconsistent with complying with those duties. Commissioners and providers have a responsibility to promote an environmentally sustainable health and care system and should assess and reduce the environmental impact of implementing NICE recommendations wherever possible. Technology appraisals The recommendations in this interactive flowchart represent the view of NICE, arrived at after careful consideration of the evidence available. When exercising their judgement, health professionals are expected to take these recommendations fully into account, alongside the individual needs, preferences and values of their patients. The application of the recommendations in this interactive flowchart is at the discretion of health professionals and their individual patients and do not override the responsibility of healthcare professionals to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the individual patient, in consultation with the patient and/or their carer or guardian. Commissioners and/or providers have a responsibility to provide the funding required to enable the recommendations to be applied when individual health professionals and their patients wish to use it, in accordance with the NHS Constitution. They should do so in light of their duties to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination, to advance equality of opportunity and to reduce health inequalities. Commissioners and providers have a responsibility to promote an environmentally sustainable health and care system and should assess and reduce the environmental impact of implementing NICE recommendations wherever possible. Medical technologies guidance, diagnostics guidance and interventional procedures guidance The recommendations in this interactive flowchart represent the view of NICE, arrived at after careful consideration of the evidence available. When exercising their judgement, healthcare professionals are expected to take these recommendations fully into account. However, the Page 9 of 10

interactive flowchart does not override the individual responsibility of healthcare professionals to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the individual patient, in consultation with the patient and/or guardian or carer. Commissioners and/or providers have a responsibility to implement the recommendations, in their local context, in light of their duties to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination, advance equality of opportunity, and foster good relations. Nothing in this interactive flowchart should be interpreted in a way that would be inconsistent with compliance with those duties. Commissioners and providers have a responsibility to promote an environmentally sustainable health and care system and should assess and reduce the environmental impact of implementing NICE recommendations wherever possible. Page 10 of 10