Problems: TRUS Bx. Clinical questions in PCa. Objectives. Jelle Barentsz. Prostate MR Center of Excellence.

Similar documents
Detection, Screening and. Jelle Barentsz, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, NL

11/10/2015. Prostate cancer in the U.S. Multi-parametric MRI of Prostate Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. NIH estimates for 2015.

1 Uniform hyperintense signal intensity (normal). 2 Linear (arrow), wedge-shaped, or diffuse mild hypointensity, usually indistinct margin.

Prostate MRI Hamidreza Abdi, MD,FEBU Post Doctoral Fellow Vancouver Prostate Centre UBC Department of Urologic Sciences May-20144

Prostate MRI: Who needs it?

MR-US Fusion Guided Biopsy: Is it fulfilling expectations?

How to detect and investigate Prostate Cancer before TRT

Prostate Cancer MRI. Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment. PSA to Prostate MRI. for patients and curious doctors

Anatomic Imaging of Prostate Cancer

PI-RADS V2 IN PRACTICE A PICTORIAL REVIEW

Low risk. Objectives. Case-based question 1. Evidence-based utilization of imaging in prostate cancer

Stephen McManus, MD David Levi, MD

Essential Initial Activities and Clinical Outcomes

My biopsy shows prostate cancer: How bad is it? How to stage prostate cancer

Utility of Prostate MRI. John R. Leyendecker, MD

Prostate MRI for local staging and surgical planning in prostate cancer

6th ESUR Teaching Course on Prostate MRI, Berlin 2016

Prostate MRI. Overview. Introduction 2/20/2015. Prostate cancer is most frequently diagnosed noncutaneous cancer in males (25%)

D. J. Margolis 1, S. Natarajan 2, D. Kumar 3, M. Macairan 4, R. Narayanan 3, and L. Marks 4

Prostate Cancer DFP Case of the Week

4 th International Workshop on Diagnostic and Interventional Prostate MRI April 2019, Thursday 11 th and Friday 12 th, Paris, France

Functional MRI in Oncology

Optimizing Implementation of Prostate MRI. Andrei S Purysko, M.D. Section of Abdominal Imaging & Nuclear Radiology Department

Osher Mini Medical School for the Public

JMSCR Vol 05 Issue 02 Page February 2017

Prostate MRI: Not So Difficult. Neil M. Rofsky, MD, FACR, FSCBTMR, FISMRM Dallas, TX

Prostate Biopsy in 2017

PROSTATE MRI. Dr. Margaret Gallegos Radiologist Santa Fe Imaging

OASIS 1.2T: MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI OF PROSTATE CANCER

TRUS Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy

The Paul Evans Memorial Lecture Functional radiotherapy targeting using focused dose escalation. Roberto Alonzi Mount Vernon Cancer Centre

Prostatectomy as salvage therapy. Cases. Paul Cathcart - Guy s & St Thomas NHS Trust, London

Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: How They Are Changing the Management of Prostate Cancer

FieldStrength. Multi-parametric 3.0T MRI provides excellent prostate imaging

Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate after Treatment of Prostate Cancer

Diagnosis and management of prostate cancer in the

The role of T2-weighted imaging in detecting prostate cancer of the central zone in 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance examination

Prostate cancer smart screening, precision diagnosis, personalised treatment'

MRI and Fusion biopsies. K Sahadevan Consultant Urologist

Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer

Multiparametric Prostate MRI: PI-RADS V.2

Improved Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using a Structured Prostate Imaging Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) Template

Screening and Risk Stratification of Men for Prostate Cancer Metastasis and Mortality

MR-TRUS Fusion Biopsy

Current Clinical Practice. MR Imaging Evaluations. MRI Anatomic Review. Imaging to Address Clinical Challenges. Prostate MR

MRI in the Enhanced Detection of Prostate Cancer: What Urologists Need to Know

PCa Commentary. Executive Summary: The "PCa risk increased directly with increasing phi values."

Essentials of Clinical MR, 2 nd edition. 73. Urinary Bladder and Male Pelvis

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine (April 2018) Vol. 71 (2), Page

PSA nadir post LDR Brachytherapy and early Salvage Therapy. Dr Duncan McLaren UK & Ireland Users Group Meeting 2016

I have no financial relationships to disclose. I WILL NOT include discussion of investigational or off-label use of a product in my presentation.

Sorveglianza Attiva update

The Impact of MRI-TRUS Cognitively Targeted Biopsy on the Incidence of Pathologic Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy

Interac(ve Experience with Prostate Imaging Repor(ng and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2)

Imaging of prostate cancer local recurrences : why and how?

Screening and Diagnosis Prostate Cancer

THE HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT BY: DR. ANDREW GROLLMAN ALBUQUERQUE UROLOGY ASSOCIATES

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

PI-RADS v2 for predicting prostate cancer Gleason score at final pathology after radical prostatectomy

To be covered. Screening, early diagnosis, and treatment including Active Surveillance for prostate cancer: where is Europe heading for?

Prostate Case Scenario 1

EUROPEAN UROLOGY 61 (2012)

A biopsy can be avoided in patients with positive DRE and negative MRI. Disagree: Michael Cohen, Chairman, Dept. of Urol. Haemek M.

Prostate MRI: Screening, Biopsy, Staging, and Ablation

MRI-targeted, transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for suspected prostate malignancy: A pictorial review

Prostate cancer staging and datasets: The Nitty-Gritty. What determines our pathological reports? 06/07/2018. Dan Berney Maastricht 2018

The current status of MRI in prostate cancer

Standards for MRI reporting the evolution to PI-RADS v 2.0

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

Prostate Biopsy. Prostate Biopsy. We canʼt go backwards: Screening has helped!

Prostate Cancer Imaging: most common pitfalls in multiparametric Magnetic Resonance

PI-RADS version 2 - what we need to know

MR-US Fusion. Image-guided prostate biopsy. Richard E Fan Department of Urology Stanford University

Prostate cancer ~ diagnosis and impact of pathology on prognosis ESMO 2017

GUIDELINES ON PROSTATE CANCER

Transformation of the South West Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Pathway. 14 th May 2018

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the management of prostate cancer: What the Radiologists need to know?

Pathologists Perspective on Focal Therapy: The Role of Mapping Biopsies and Markers

Multiparametric MRI diagnostic value in a case of prostate cancer

Clinical Prostate Cancer Imaging

Prostate MRI based on PI-RADS version 2: how we review and report

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING PROSTATE/MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI EFFECTIVE DATE: 06/21/18

Case Discussions: Prostate Cancer

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Approach, Local Staging and Therapeutic Impact

Cancer. Description. Section: Surgery Effective Date: October 15, 2016 Subsection: Original Policy Date: September 9, 2011 Subject:

GUIDELINEs ON PROSTATE CANCER

Understanding the risk of recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer. Aditya Bagrodia, MD

NICE BULLETIN Diagnosis & treatment of prostate cancer

Controversies in Prostate Cancer Screening

Accuracy of Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Meta-Analysis

The Royal Marsden. Prostate case study. Presented by Mr Alan Thompson Consultant Urological Surgeon

High Intensity Focused Ultrasounds for the treatment of Prostate Cancers Clinical update November D. Maruzzi - L. Ruggera

Multiparametric 3T MR imaging of the prostate - acquisition protocols and image evaluation

10/2/2018 OBJECTIVES PROSTATE HEALTH BACKGROUND THE PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX PHI*: BETTER PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION

Prostate Cancer Local or distant recurrence?

AJCC Cancer Staging 8 th Edition. Prostate Chapter 58. Executive Committee, AJCC. Professor and Director, Duke Prostate Center

Effect of intravenous contrast medium administration on prostate diffusion-weighted imaging

Update on Reporting Prostate Cancer Pathology

Chapter 2. Understanding My Diagnosis

Transcription:

Multi-parametric MR imaging in Problems: TRUS Bx Low Risk Prostate Cancer Important cancers are missed Jelle Barentsz Clinically insignificant cancers are identified by Prostate MR Center of Excellence chance Department of Radiology Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center The Netherlands 36-46% undergrading of Gleason score j.barentsz@rad.umcn.nl Objectives Learning Objectives Clinical questions in PCa How to decrease the number of biopsy cores and increase the yield? Can mp-mri show the exact location of the (most) aggressive part of the tumor? 1. Improve localization & detection 2. Determine aggression 3. Improve local staging 4. Detect nodal metastases 5. Detect recurrences 1

Clinical questions in PCa Localization/detection 1. Improve localization & detection 2. Determine aggression 3. Improve local staging 4. Detect nodal metastases 5. Detect recurrences Futterer, Radiol 2006 multi-parametric MRI > anatomic MRI Patient 62 y, PSA 28 8x negative TRUS Bx (96 cores) Patient 62 y: Your diagnosis? 1.7 cm line normal 2

Patient 62 y Multi-parametric detection MRI (30 min, no ERC) T2-w anatomy DWI (b800) ADC DCE - MRI TRUSor MRguidance? 1.7 cm line Next step? my view! c. Hambrock MR-guided biopsy: patient 62 y Multi-modality MR-guided biopsy in tumor detection Gleason score 4+3 Hambrock J Urol 2010 3

c. Cornud, France c. Cornud, France Clinical questions in PCa Dogs and Prostate 1. Improve detection & localization 2. Determine aggression 3. Improve local staging 4. Detect small nodal metastases 5. Detect recurrences / follow up What is the association betweeen dogs and prostate cancers? 4

Dogs and Prostate Dogs and Prostate Benign Intermediate aggressive c. T. Hambrock Gleason 3 c. T. Hambrock Gleason 4 Dogs and Prostate DWI: ADC-value vs Gleason score Highly aggressive Pearson Correlation r = 0.73 p < 0.01 c. T. Hambrock Gleason 5 Hambrock, Radiology 2011, Alvares, Radiology, in press, Itou JMRI 2011 5

Two Patient Cohorts 33 MR-GB Patients Multimodality MRI-Localization MR-GB towards darkest part on ADC-map 64 TRUS-GB Patients 10-Core TRUS biopsy (Siemens, Trio Tim) TRUS-Bx & MR-Bx vs Prostatectomy Biopsy Gleason Prostatectomy Gleason Hambrock 2010 SCBTMR Lauterbur Award TRUS-Bx & MR-Bx vs Prostatectomy TRUS-Bx & MR-Bx vs Prostatectomy Undergrading Undergrading 5% P < 0.001 46% 46% Hambrock 2010 SCBTMR Lauterbur Award Hambrock 2010 SCBTMR Lauterbur Award 6

Improved localization and determination of aggression Improved localization and determination of aggression Active Surveillance Active Surveillance Screening? Screening? Focal therapy Focal therapy AS: exclusion of high grade tumors T2-w + MRSI Sens for Gl 4+3: 93% Spec for Gl 4+3: 98% NPV: for Gl 4+3: 98% G. Villiers: RSNA 2010 Villers et al. J Urol December 2006 Tumour vol 0.2cc 0.5cc Sensitivity 77% 90% Specificity 91% 88% PPV 86% 77% NPV 85% 95% 7

AS (PRIAS) protocol AS (PRIAS) protocol Year 1 2 3 4 Year 1 2 3 4 Month 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 30 36 42 48 Month 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 30 36 42 48 PSA-test PSA-test DRE DRE Biopsy Biopsy Clinical Evaluation Clinical Evaluation MRI MRI Patients MR-indicated patient exclusions 7/25 (28%) MR-GB: Gleason grade 4-5 2 nd cancer location 1 V V 2 V 3 V 4 V 5 V 6 V 7 V Hoeks, RSNA 2010 Stage T3a: ECE Case: 69 y. PSA 6.7, T1, Gl. 3+3, 1/9 cores 5% Candidate for Active Surveillance 6 x 4 x 6 mm (0.14 cc) 8

Case: 69 y. PSA 6.7, T1, Gl. 3+3, 1/9 cores 5% Case: 69 y. PSA 6.7, T1, Gl. 3+3, 1/9 cores 5% all 5 biopsy cores 80%, Gleason 8 DWI DCE with extension in periprostatic fat (T3a) Patient exclusion Improved localization and determination of aggression Active Surveillance Screening? Focal laser therapy ERSPC: Goteborg trial: Learning Objectives however at high cost: biopsies, overdiagnosis do not use PSA alone apply risk modifiers identify indolent disease develop better markers Rationale screening mortality reduction: 31% mortality reduction: 44% Hanley J Med Screen 2010: : mortality reduction: 50-60 60% 9

Rationale screening Learning Objectives Screening Learning Objectives ERSPC: Goteborg trial: however at high cost: biopsies, overdiagnosis do not use PSA alone apply risk modifiers identify indolent disease develop better markers mortality reduction: 31% mortality reduction: 44% Hanley J Med Screen 2010: : mortality reduction: 50-60% ERSPC: Goteborg trial: however at a high cost: do not use PSA alone apply risk modifiers identify indolent disease develop better markers mortality reduction: 31% mortality reduction: 44% Hanley J Med Screen 2010: : mortality reduction: 50-60% add mp-mri mp-mri MRI will miss MRI >>PCa3 Clinical questions in PCa Patient 48 y, sexually active; PSA 9 Gl 4+3; DRE T1 1. Improve detection & localization 2. Determine aggression 3. Improve local staging 4. Detect small nodal metastases 5. Detect recurrences 3T ERC only when detecting minimal ECE is important: (se 87% sp 96%) 10

ECE 2 mm close to NVB: min. T3a, R- DTI: position of PCa to NVB T c. H. Morales, S. Verma, Cincinnati, USA Clinical questions in PCa 1. Improve detection & localization 2. Determine aggression 3. Improve local staging 4. Detect nodal metastases 5. Detect recurrences Are we there? 11

Yes we Scan! even in non-academia at 1.5T without ERC T2WI ADC (900) But we need Awareness and knowledge of MRI of: DCE DWI b800 Radiologists, Urologists, Radiation Oncologists, Patients c. John Feller, Palm Desert Awareness and knowledge of: Radiologists, Urologists, Radiation Oncologists, Patients We need Standardized Protocols: simple and good 1. Detection / recurrence protocol (20-30 min, - ERC) - Guidelines for: * standardized protocols: simple, good, fast 2. Staging protocol (45-55 55 min, +/-ERC ERC) 3. Bone & node protocol (20-35 min, - ERC) 12

Awareness and knowledge of: Radiologists, Urologists, Radiation Oncologists, Patients - Guidelines for: We need Score T2W Classification System (Pi-RADS) Criteria 1 Uniform high signal intensity or heterogeneous transitional zone adenoma with well-defined margins 2 Linear or geographic areas of lower SI on T2W images 3 Intermediate appearances not in categories 1/2 or 3/4 4 Discrete, homogenous low signal focus/mass confined to the prostate 5 Discrete, homogeneous low signal intensity focus with extra-capsular extension /invasive behaviour or mass effect on the capsule (bulging) Score DWI Criteria 1 No reduction in ADC compared to normal glandular tissue. No increase in signal on any high b-value image ( b1000) 2 Diffuse, hyper intensity on b1000 image with low ADC; No focal features - linear, triangular or geographical features allowed 3 Intermediate appearances not in categories 1/2 or 3/4 4 Focal area(s) of reduced ADC but iso-intense signal intensity on high b-value images ( b1000) 5 Focal area/mass of hyper intensity on the high b-value images ( b1000) with reduced ADC * structured reporting (Pi-RADS) Score DCE Criteria 1 Type 1 enhancement curve 2 Type 2 enhancement curve 3 Type 3 enhancement curve +1 For focal enhancing lesion with curve type 2 or 3 +1 For asymmetric lesion r lesion at an unusual place with curve shape 2 or 3 Score MRSI Criteria 1 Citrate peak exceeds choline peak >2 times 2 Citrate peak exceeds choline peak >1-2 times 3 Choline peak equals citrate peak 4 Choline peak exceeds citrate peak >1-2 times 5 Choline peak exceeds citrate peak >2 times DCE: 5/5 DWI: 5/5 Structured Analysis workstation 5 point scale: Pi-RADS Structured Reporting DWI: 5/5 T2W: 5/5 DCE: 5/5 MRSI: 2/5 13

We need also - availability - education - certification - multi-center trials - sub-specialization specialization in PCa? Multi-parametric MRI shows where PCa is, it s aggression, and if it grows outside the prostate This will decrease the number of needle cores, and improve its yield MRI opens the way to tailored (minimal invasive) therapy, which reduces side-effectseffects Thank you for your attention 14