Nutrient Recommendations Agronomic Crops Last Updated 12/1/16. Grain Corn. Crop Highlights Target ph: 6.0

Similar documents
Nutrient management irrigated corn. Jim Camberato

Understanding a Soil Report

Interpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations

Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management. Hailin Zhang. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

Fertilization Programming

Nutrient Management for Texas High Plains Cotton Production

Enclosed are the tissue analysis results for the samples from the greens at Golf Club.

Nutrient Management for Texas High Plains Cotton Production

Apples and Pears. Above 2.7. Above 2.4

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Plant Nutrients in Mineral Soils

Potassium and Phosphorus as Plant Nutrients. Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. Potassium is required in large amounts by many crops

AGVISE Laboratories Established 1976

What s new with micronutrients in our part of the world?

Soil Composition. Air

Dry Bean Fertility Dave Franzen NDSU Soil Science Specialist

AgriCal by. Healthier Soils Stronger Plants Higher Yields

MEASURE AND MANAGE. Zinc. By Dale Cowan Agri-Food Laboratories CCA.On

INTERPRETATION GUIDE TO SOIL TEST REPORTS

Using Tissue and Soil Tests Together Helps Make Better Decisions. John Lee Soil Scientist AGVISE Northwood, ND

Limitations to Plant Analysis. John Peters & Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Understanding Your Soil Report. Michael Cook 2018

BOTANY AND PLANT GROWTH Lesson 9: PLANT NUTRITION. MACRONUTRIENTS Found in air and water carbon C oxygen hydrogen

Animal, Plant & Soil Science. D3-7 Characteristics and Sources of Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients

Micronutrient Management. Dorivar Ruiz Diaz Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management

Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

How to Develop a Balanced Program for Pecan and Chili. Robert R Smith

Soil Nutrients and Fertilizers. Essential Standard Explain the role of nutrients and fertilizers.

Plant Food. Nitrogen (N)

DAFFODILS ARE WHAT THEY EAT: NUTRITIONAL ASPECTS OF SOILS

Barley and Sugarbeet Symposium

Secondary and Micronutrients

Nutrients. Carbon, Hydrogen, and Oxygen 1/18/2012. Soils, Nutrients and Fertilizers Part I I. 17 elements essential for plant growth

What is NUTRIO? Product Line for Biologically Active Products. Biologically Derived Products. Microbial Inoculants

Fertility management in soybean

Variability in Tissue Testing What Does It Mean For Nutrient Recommendations?

Potash Phosphate Nitrogen

2009 Elba Muck Soil Nutrient Survey Results Summary, Part III: Calcium, Magnesium and Micronutrients

REMEMBER as we go through this exercise: Science is the art of making simple things complicated!

Nut Crop Nutrition Understanding the Principles to Optimize the Practices.

Nutrient Management. Ontario Certified Crop Adviser Pre-Exam Workshop Woodstock, Ontario 20 January 2014

12. ZINC - The Major Minor

Markus Braaten. Elston D. Solberg. Director of Agri-Knowledge Agri-Trend. US Director of Agri-Knowledge Agri-Trend USA

Nutrients & Diagnosing Nutrient Needs. Carrie Laboski Dept. of Soil Science UW-Madison

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this lesson:

Wednesday February 12, 2014 Managing P and Zn

Soil Testing Options in High Tunnels. Bruce Hoskins University of Maine anlab.umesci.maine.edu

FERTILIZER EFFECTS UPON MICRONUTRIENT NUTRITION OF THE AVOCADO

MEASURE AND MANAGE. Soiless Mixes, Testing and Nutrition Guidelines

Nutrition of Horticultural Crops. Monica Ozores-Hampton University of Florida/IFAS/SWFREC Spring 2013

Stoller s Options and Timings for Increasing Tuber Numbers in Potatoes

Chapter 7: Micronutrient Management

Supplying Nutrients to Crops

COMPARISON OF IMPREGNATED DRY FERTILIZER WITH S AND ZN BLENDS FOR CORN AND SOYBEANS

ADVANCING CORN YIELDS. Sulf-N Ammonium Sulfate

Biosolids Nutrien Management an Soil Testing. Craig Cogger, Soil Scientis WSU Puyallup

Discuss the importance of healthy soils Soil properties, physical, chemical and biological that one can manage for soil health How organics play a

A & L GREAT LAKES LABORATORIES, INC.

Lime and Fertilizer Recommendations for the Various Crops of Tennessee. Chapter IV Commercial Vegetable/Root Crop Production.

Advanced ph management

NUTRITION KNOW-HOW P.O. BOX 897 // WILLMAR, MN (800) // WCDST.COM

Developing your Fertilizer Management Program. Outline. 2/6/2018. Other factors Species Correct site Weather Weed control. Soil physical properties

Corn and soybean yield responses to micronutrients fertilization

Quick Tips for Nutrient Management in Washington Berry Crops. Lisa Wasko DeVetter Assistant Professor, Small Fruit Horticulture March 16, 2016

Use of Soil and Tissue Testing for Sustainable Crop Nutrient Programs

Micronutrient Requirements of Crops

Nutrient Management in Subtropical Tree Crops. The avocado model

Greenhouse Horticulture

1) Yellow Corn in 2014 Compared to 2013 and ) Time of Day Plant Tissue Project

1. Zinc as a plant nutrient 1 2. Preparing for a prescribed burn 2 3. Fertilizing cotton 4

FERTILIZING GREENHOUSE CROPS

Interpreting Soil Tests for Efficient Plant Growth and Water Use

THE ECONOMICS OF FERTILIZING ALFALFA IN CALIFORNIA. Roland D. Meyer Extension Soils Specialist University of California, Davis

SOIL TEST INTERPRETATION JIM FASCHING Technical Field Representative

Nitrogen. Cotton Fertility. Glen Harris University of Georgia (Tifton) Sulfur. Phosphorous

Introduction to Soil Minerals

Mineral Nutrition of Fruit & Nut Trees. Fruit & Nut Tree Nutrition 3/1/2013. Johnson - Nutrition 1

FERTILIZER FACTS. Publication January 1986

Foliar Micro Nutrients in High Management Crop Production. Tim Eyrich Manager Nutrition Product Development Winfield Solutions

Soil 4234 Guest Lecture

PURE BRAZIL BRAND PRODUCTS

SOILS AND PLANT NUTRITION

Nutrient Deficiencies and Application Injuries in Field Crops

Correction of Zinc Deficiency in Avocado

Principles of Biological Systems Dan Kittredge Presenter, Day 1

Soybean Soil Fertility

Catalog

Protein and Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer and Variation of Plant Tissue Analysis in Wheat

Manage Vegetable Crops for a high-performance season

Soil Program Recommendation

FERTILIZING. Correct time is during October and November. Sample young, fully developed, hardened off leaves.

Vegetable Update 2013

FLUID PHOSPHATES: ORTHO VS. POLY SALT INDEX STORAGE. Fluid Technology Roundup December 5, 2017 Raun Lohry 1M Solutions, LLC

2010 Course 6. Dan Kittredge

Murray State Theses and Dissertations

Nutrient level (EC) in a pot is like a bank

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. Volume II, Issue 5 October 05

May 2008 AG/Soils/ pr Understanding Your Soil Test Report Grant E. Cardon Jan Kotuby-Amacher Pam Hole Rich Koenig General Information

Essential Soil Nutrients for Plant Growth and Development

Transcription:

Nutrient Recommendations Agronomic Crops Last Updated 12/1/16 Crop Highlights Target ph: 6.0 Grain Corn Split N applications to increase N-use efficiency in corn. Apply a small amount (20-25%) at planting and the bulk of the N requirement (75-80%) when the plants are 12-15" tall. Use the Pre-sidedress Soil Nitrate Test for manured ground or following legume crops to calculate crop N needs in season In irrigated corn where fertigation is possible, split N applications to increase N-use efficiency. Apply a small amount (15-20%) at planting and split the remainder into equal increments to be applied with irrigation water from the 5-6 leaf stage through silking. Use the Leaf Chlorophyll Meter to monitor crop N needs in season and make small adjustments as needed. Use the Corn Stalk Nitrate Test (CSNT) at the end of the season to monitor the success of the N management program. Monitor crop for Mn deficiency, especially when soil test Mn is less than 3.4 lbs/ac. Yield Goal Corn yields are influenced by many factors, including the hybrids selected, planting date, weather, soil type and water-holding capacity, nutrient and water availability, weed, insect and disease pressure and crop management practices. Typical yield goals for corn grown for grain on Delaware soils are shown in Table 1, below. Ranges reflect the variation in soil type, water and tillage management. Delaware growers should use field history to determine the yield goal for each field and use that information to adjust management decisions and fertility programs accordingly. Delaware nutrient management law requires the use of optimal rolling average for determining the yield goal for a specific field when field history is available. To calculate the optimal rolling average yield, see UD Extension Fact Sheet Estimating Yield Goal for Crops (http://extension.udel.edu/factsheets/estimating-yield-goal-for-crops/). When field history supports the use of a different yield goal than shown in Table 1, growers should use that information to adjust management decisions and fertility programs accordingly. Table 1. Corn grain yield as a function of irrigation use and management level Dryland Corn Production Grain Yield ---------------------- bu/ac ----------------------- Traditional Management 125 220 Irrigated Corn Production Level of Management High Management 240 270 Intensive Crop Management 270 300

Target ph: 6.0 for most soils Soils that are high in organic matter ("black" soils) have a lower target ph (5.6) because organic matter moderates some of the negative effects of excessive soil acidity (e.g., aluminum toxicity). The lime recommendation for a specific field is calculated from the soil ph and buffer ph measurements using the steps outlined in outlined in UD Extension Fact Sheet Calculating the Lime Requirement Using the Adams-Evans Soil Buffer. Avoid over-liming to prevent deficiency of micronutrients such as manganese. The recommended liming source is dependent upon soil test calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) and can be determined using Table 2. Recommended Liming Source: Table 2. Recommended type of lime as a function of soil test Ca and Mg concentrations. Soil Test Levels Recommended Lime Type Soil Test Mg less than 50 FIVs Dolomitic Soil Test Mg between 50 and 100 FIVs AND LESS Dolomitic than Soil Test Ca Soil Test Mg greater than 100 FIVs Calcitic Soil Test Mg GREATER than 50 FIVs AND Calcitic GREATER than Soil Test Ca Nitrogen: 1. University of Delaware nitrogen (N) recommendations for grain corn productions are based on a N rate of 1 lb N per bushel of expected yield per acre e.g, for an expected yield of 175 bu/ac, the recommendation would be 175 lbs N/ac. 2. For most efficient N use, split N applications during the growing season. 3. Apply no more than one quarter of the recommended rate of N at or just prior to planting. 4. The remainder should be sidedressed when corn plants are 12-15 inches tall and the period of maximum N uptake is beginning. 5. In irrigated fields where fertigation is possible, the remainder should be split into equal increments and applied with irrigation water beginning at the 5-6 th leaf stage and continuing through silking. 6. For fields with a history of manure use, where a green manure has been plowed down or with high levels of organic matter, use the Pre-sidedress Soil Nitrate Test to determine the actual sidedress N rate for the field. 7. For in-season monitoring of crop N status, growers may wish to use the leaf chlorophyll meter but this will require the use of a well-n-fertilized reference strip. 8. In particular irrigated growers may wish to use the end-of-season stalk nitrate test to monitor the success of their N program. Phosphorus Phosphorus recommendations for corn are dependent upon the nutrient requirement of the crop as a function yield goal and crop management practices including tillage and nutrient application methods (e.g., banding, broadcast application or a combination of the two methods). Recommended rates are presented for three management scenarios:

1. Select Table 2 when phosphate will be banded only. This is the recommended practice for no-till systems but is suitable for all tillage schemes. 2. Select Table 3 when phosphate will be broadcast at or prior to planting. Broadcast applications are NOT recommended for no-till fields. 3. Select Table 4 when starter P will be banded and the remainder will be applied as a broadcast application. 4. If soil test P is Excessive (i.e., P-FIV s >100), the application of P in fertilizers or manures is NOT RECOMMENDED. Table 2. Recommended phosphorus rate for grain corn as a function of expected yield when all phosphorus will be applied as a band application. --------------------------------------------------------- lbs P2O5/ac ----------------------------------------------------------- 125 80 70 60 50 40 25 25 20 20 15 15 150 90 75 70 60 50 30 30 25 25 20 20 175 95 80 80 70 60 45 45 30 30 25 25 200 100 85 85 80 70 50 50 45 45 30 30 225 105 90 90 85 80 55 55 50 50 35 35 250 110 95 95 90 85 60 60 55 55 40 40 275 115 100 100 95 90 65 65 60 60 45 45 300 120 110 105 100 95 70 70 65 65 50 50 Table 3. Recommended phosphorus rate for grain corn as a function of expected yield when all phosphorus will be applied as a broadcast application. --------------------------------------------------------- lbs P2O5/ac ----------------------------------------------------------- 125 160 140 110 90 70 60 50 50 40 40 40 150 175 155 125 105 85 70 60 60 50 50 50 175 190 170 140 120 100 75 65 65 55 55 55 200 205 185 155 135 115 85 75 75 65 65 60 225 220 200 170 150 130 90 80 80 70 70 65 250 235 215 185 165 145 100 90 90 80 80 70 275 250 230 200 180 160 105 95 95 85 85 75 300 265 245 215 195 175 115 105 105 95 95 80 Table 4. Recommended phosphorus rate for grain corn as a function of expected yield when applied as a broadcast + starter application. --------------------------------------------------------- lbs P2O5/ac ----------------------------------------------------------- Starter Band All yields 40 40 35 35 30 30 25 25 20 20 20 Broadcast Rate 125 80 60 40 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 95 75 55 35 25 10 10 10 10 10 10 175 110 90 70 50 40 15 15 15 15 15 15 200 125 105 85 65 55 25 25 25 25 25 25 225 140 120 100 80 70 30 30 30 30 30 30 250 155 135 115 95 85 40 40 40 40 40 40

275 170 150 130 110 100 45 45 45 45 45 45 300 185 165 145 125 115 55 55 55 55 55 55 Potassium Table 3. Recommended potassium rate for grain corn as a function of expected yield. --------------------------------------------------------- lbs K2O/ac ----------------------------------------------------------- 125 110 95 80 60 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 150 140 120 100 80 60 45 45 45 45 45 45 175 170 145 120 95 70 55 55 55 55 55 55 200 190 165 140 110 80 60 60 60 60 60 60 225 210 190 160 140 115 70 70 70 70 70 70 250 230 205 180 155 130 75 75 75 75 75 75 275 250 220 200 170 145 85 85 85 85 85 85 300 270 240 220 185 160 95 95 95 95 95 95 1. Potassium can be broadcast in the fall or spring or banded at planting. 2. If both N and K are to be banded, the sum of the N + K 2O rates should not exceed 75 lbs/ac or salt injury to seedlings may occur. Magnesium 1. Magnesium is recommended when Soil Test Magnesium is less than 40 FIVs. 2. If Soil Test Mg is less than 40 FIVs and lime is recommended, use dolomitic limestone. 3. If Soil Test Mg is less than 40 FIVs and lime is not needed, apply soluble Mg according to the rates in Table 4, below. Table 4. Recommended application rates of soluble magnesium as a function of soil test Mg index value. UD FIVs Soluble Mg 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 lbs soluble Mg/ac 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Sulfur Sulfur (S) deficiency is frequently observed in corn grown on Delaware's sandy, highly leached, low-organicmatter soils. Deficiency is most likely to occur under irrigated production practices where intensive management is employed to obtain maximum yields. Deficiency is less common on high-organic-matter soils or those with a history of manure application as both materials provide moderate amounts of plant-available S. Prediction of S deficiency is difficult. Currently available routine tests are not good predictors of S deficiency situations because many Delaware soils have a supply of plant available-s in subsoil horizons that will not be detected in samples taken from shallower depths. Subsoil sampling to a depth of 24 inches is highly recommended as a means of identifying soils with subsoil reserves of S. Suspected S deficiency can be confirmed through tissue analysis of ear leaf samples collected at early silking. Tissue samples collected earlier in the season are not good indicators of yield-limiting S deficiency because roots, may not have penetrated subsoil reserves at that time. In-season correction of S deficiency may be difficult. If the ear leaf S concentration is less than the critical value of 0.12% and/or the N:S ratio is greater than 15:1, S deficiency is occurring. Apply 30-40 lbs S as ammonium sulfate to correct the deficiency.

To prevent S deficiency in subsequent years, apply one of the following treatments: 1. Broadcast 30-40 lbs actual S/ac as ammonium sulfate (24% S) or gypsum (19%S) at planting. 2. Band 20-30 lbs actual S/ac as ammonium sulfate at planting. Long-term applications of ammonium sulfate or other acid-forming fertilizers may lower ph of the soil surface and require correction with lime. Monitor surface ph with a 0-2 inch soil sample, especially in no-till systems. Also remember that sulfate-s is available for crop uptake immediately after application. If a reduced form of S is applied (e.g., thiosulfate or elemental S), allow adequate time for oxidation of the applied S to the sulfate form to occur. Manganese Manganese (Mn) needs are predicted by an Availability Index that includes M3 soil test Mn and soil ph. Interpretation is crop specific. MnAI = 101.7 (15.2 soil ph) + (2.11 M3-Mn) Where: MnAI Soil ph M3-Mn = Mn availability index = Soil ph measured in water (1:1 V:V) = Mehlich 3 soil test Mn in lbs/ac Table 5. Interpretation of Mn availability index. Mn Availability Index Less than 25 Interpretation Mn deficiency is likely at this soil ph and soil test Mn concentration 25 to 35 Mn deficiency is possible at this soil ph and soil test Mn concentration. Monitor the crop for symptoms, especially if liming has been recommended. Greater than 35 Mn deficiency is unlikely. 1. If Mn deficiency is predicted or was observed in the previous growing season, band 8-10 lbs actual Mn/ac. 2. Broadcast applications of acid forming fertilizers may correct Mn deficiency without the actual application of Mn in some cases, but may be less effective than applications of Mn. 3. If Mn deficiency symptoms appear during the growing season or after an application of lime, a foliar application of 1.0 to 2.0 lbs/ac actual Mn as Mn sulfate, Mn oxide or chelated Mn can alleviate the symptoms and restore yield potential. Apply only when adequate growth is present to aid absorption of foliar Mn. NOTE: When using foliar application to correct Mn deficiency, growers may combine the treatment with a post emergence herbicide application to reduce the number of trips across the field. Sulfate containing forms of Mn (e.g., manganese sulfate (Techmangam) and manganese-lignin-sulfate have been shown to be antagonistic to weed control with Roundup. To overcome this antagonism, growers should add ammonium sulfate at a rate of 17 lbs per 100 gallons of solution. Chelated-Mn (Mn-EDTA) has shown a slight degree of antagonism but little to no reduction in weed control was noted in the field studies.

Zinc Zinc (Zn) deficiency is predicted by an Availability Index that includes not only M3 soil test Zn, but also soil ph and M3 soil test P. It is most common on soils with a ph of 6.5 or higher and high soil test P concentrations but may also be induced by environmental conditions such as cold, wet soils that may limit root growth. Zinc deficiency symptoms often appear early in the season and disappear as root growth increases and/or environmental conditions improve. See Table 7 to determine if Zn deficiency is predicted for this field. Table 7. Interpretation of Zn availability index. Soil Test Criteria M3-Zn is less than 1.9 lbs/ac M3-Zn is less than 3.1 lbs/ac AND soil ph is higher than 7.0 M3-Zn is less than 3.1 lbs/ac AND soil ph is 6.6 or higher AND M3-P is 100 FIVs or higher M3-Zn is 3.2 lbs/ac or higher Interpretation Zn deficiency is predicted Zn deficiency is predicted Zn deficiency is predicted Soil should be sufficient in Zn If Zn deficiency is predicted by the availability index or was observed the previous year, one of the following treatments can be applied: 1. Broadcast 10-12 lbs/ac actual Zn as Zn sulfate or Zn oxide or 2-3 lbs/ac actual Zn as Zn chelate. Broadcast applications should correct Zn deficiency for several years. 2. If a banded application is preferred, apply 6-8 lbs/ac actual Zn as Zn sulfate or Zn oxide or 1-2 lbs/ac actual Zn as Zn chelate in the fertilizer band. Banded applications are only effective in the growing season in which they are applied. 3. Foliar application of 1 lb/ac actual Zn as Zn sulfate or Zn oxide or 0.5 lb/ac actual Zn as Zn chelate in 20 to 50 gallons of water. Apply only when adequate growth is present to aid absorption of foliar Zn. Application should be repeated if symptoms re-appear. Boron 1. Boron (B) deficiency is occasionally observed in intensively managed, irrigated corn production. Boron applications are not, however, a general recommendation at this time. If B deficiency symptoms appear, contact your county agent for assistance with diagnosis and corrective recommendations.