Receipt within 1 day of specimen collection. Report AFB b smear result within 1 day from receipt of specimen

Similar documents
Overview of Mycobacterial Culture, Identification, and Drug Susceptibility Testing

Ken Jost, BA, has the following disclosures to make:

Diagnosis of TB: Laboratory Ken Jost Tuesday April 1, 2014

Trends in Testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex from US Public Health Laboratories,

TB Intensive San Antonio, Texas November 11 14, 2014

Diagnosis of TB: Laboratory Ken Jost Tuesday April 9, 2013

TB Laboratory for Nurses

Stacy White, PhD May 12, TB for Community Providers. Phoenix, Arizona

MIC = Many Inherent Challenges Sensititre MIC for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex

CDPH - CTCA Joint Guidelines Guideline for Micobacteriology Services In California

TB 101 Disease, Clinical Assessment and Lab Testing

TB Nurse Case Management. March 7-9, Diagnosis of TB: Ken Jost Wednesday March 7, 2012

Frances Morgan, PhD October 21, Comprehensive Care of Patients with Tuberculosis and Their Contacts October 19 22, 2015 Wichita, KS

The ABC s of AFB s Laboratory Testing for Tuberculosis. Gary Budnick Connecticut Department of Public Health Mycobacteriology Laboratory

Towards Harmonization of Mycobacteriology in TB Trials. Study 31/ACTG 5349 Key Elements of Mycobacteriology Laboratory Procedures

Grant Summary Report: Expansion of Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for TB In Public Health Laboratories

National TB Services Survey Report

NAAT in the Clinical Laboratory and Impact on Infection Control 9 th National Conference on Laboratory Aspects of Tuberculosis APHL

CDC s Approach to Fast Track Laboratory Diagnosis for Persons at Risk of Drug Resistant TB: Molecular Detection of Drug Resistance (MDDR) Service

Mycobacteria Diagnostic Testing in Manitoba. Dr. Michelle Alfa Medical Director, DSM Clin Micro Discipline

Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques. Hugo Donaldson Consultant Microbiologist Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

Public Health Mycobacteriology (TB) Laboratory Testing Services

Clinical and Public Health Impact of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) for Tuberculosis

Laboratory Diagnosis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex. Objectives

WSLH Testing and Surveillance Updates

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CLINICAL LABORATORY EVALUATION PROGRAM

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CLINICAL LABORATORY EVALUATION PROGRAM

AFB Identification Texas Approach

Objectives. TB Laboratory Methods

TB/HIV 2 sides of the same coin. Dr. Shamma Shetye, MD Microbiology Metropolis Healthcare, Mumbai

How best to structure a laboratory network with new technologies

General Session IV - Dale Schwab April 20, 2017

Role of the Laboratory in TB Diagnosis and Management

Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for the Diagnosis of TB

WELCOME. Lab Talk: What a Nurse Hears. April 18, NTNC Annual Meeting Lab Talk: What a Nurse Hears

Nucleic Acid Amplification Test for Tuberculosis. Heidi Behm, RN, MPH Acting TB Controller HIV/STD/TB Program Oregon, Department of Health Services

Research Methods for TB Diagnostics. Kathy DeRiemer, PhD, MPH University of California, Davis Shanghai, China: May 8, 2012

TB In Detroit 2011* Early TB: Smudge Sign. Who is at risk for exposure to or infection with TB? Who is at risk for TB after exposure or infection?

Essential Mycobacteriology Laboratory Services in the Era of MDR- and XDR-TB: A TB Controller s Perspective

Latent Tuberculosis Infections Controversies in Diagnosis and Management Update 2016

A Clinician s Guide to the TB Laboratory

Tuberculosis Tools: A Clinical Update

Original Article Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF in detection of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis cases in China

Targeted Testing and the Diagnosis of. Latent Tuberculosis. Infection and Tuberculosis Disease

Successful strategies for reporting TB results to public health officials. Max Salfinger, MD Mycobacteriology and Pharmacokinetics Denver, Colorado

New Tuberculosis Guidelines. Jason Stout, MD, MHS

TUBERCULOSIS IN HEALTHCARE SETTINGS Diana M. Nilsen, MD, FCCP Director of Medical Affairs, Bureau of Tuberculosis Control New York City Department of

TB is Local. Barry Chin, Boston Globe, 10/15/2008. * BUT only in appropriate setting

TB Nurse Case Management Davenport, Iowa September 27 28, 2011

Mycobacterial cell wall. Cell Cycle Lengths. Outline of Laboratory Methods. Laboratory Methods

Rapid Diagnostic Techniques for Identifying Tuberculosis Ken Jost November 13, 2008

Diagnosis of tuberculosis

POSITIONING OF TB DX : TIERED SYSTEM, INTEGRATED APPROACH

Case Study: TB-HIV co-infection

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: Understanding this new diagnostic and who will have access to it

Principles of laboratory diagnosis of M. tuberculosis. Anne-Marie Demers, MD, FRCPC 11 September 2017

Drug susceptibility testing for tuberculosis KRISTEN DICKS, MD, MPH DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

Chapter 4 Diagnosis of Tuberculosis Disease

Guidelines for Tuberculosis Control in New Zealand 2010 Chapter 11: Mycobacteriology: Laboratory Methods and Standards

LATENT TUBERCULOSIS. Robert F. Tyree, MD

TB BASICS: PRIORITIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS

TB NAAT testing at the Los Angeles County Public Health Laboratory

New Standards for an Old Disease:

TB: Management in an era of multiple drug resistance. Bob Belknap M.D. Denver Public Health November 2012

CULTURE OR PCR WHAT IS

The Diagnosis of Active TB. Deborah McMahan, MD TB Intensive September 28, 2017

Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Assessing Your Laboratory

Let s Talk TB A Series on Tuberculosis, A Disease That Affects Over 2 Million Indians Every Year

Health Care Worker Training on Roll Out New TB Diagnostic Test. Prepared by: City Health (J Caldwell) & NHLS (M Bosman & I Noordien)

2 ND YEAR RESEARCH ELECTIVE RESIDENT S JOURNAL Volume X, Ellie R. Carmody. A. Background and Study Rationale.

Changing TB Isolation Practices: Consensus Statement Concerning the Incorporation of Molecular Testing

MYCOBACTERIOLOGY INTRODUCTION RANGE OF LABORATORY SERVICES

Diagnosis and Management of Active Tuberculosis

Report of TB/HIV Diagnostics Task Force. Barbara Laughon NIAID, NIH

The MODS Assay for Detection of TB and TB Drug Resistance: A Multi-center Study

Mycobacterium Tuberculosis: Assessing Your Laboratory Edition

NOLA TB TIMES. TB Diagnostics A Special Issue. on TB Diagnosis 101. Diagnostic Discrepancy Data. Comprehensive Approach

TB Update: March 2012

Asking the Right Questions. A Visual Guide to Tuberculosis Case Management for Nurses. Reference Guide

Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) Dr.Kishore Yadav J Assistant Professor

Diagnosis of tuberculosis in children

Laboratory s Role in the Battle Against Drug Resistant Tuberculosis

AN ACTIVIST S GUIDE TO. Tuberculosis Diagnostic Tools

Evaluation of Molecular Diagnostic Tests for TB (Option B Study)

New Approaches to the Diagnosis and Management of Tuberculosis Infection in Children and Adolescents

Online Annexes (2-4)

TB Clinical Guidelines: Revision Highlights March 2014

Rapid PCR TB Testing Results in 68.5% Reduction in Unnecessary Isolation Days in Smear Positive Patients.

TUBERCULOSIS. Presented By: Public Health Madison & Dane County

National Xpert MTB/RIF Programme

CDC IMMIGRATION REQUIREMENTS:

New frontiers: Innovation and Access

Diagnosis of drug resistant TB

Evaluation of Genxpert Real Time PCR POC in the Diagnosis of Multidrug Resistant TB Among Patients Attending NTBLTC Saye-Zaria Nigeria

TB the basics. (Dr) Margaret (DHA) and John (INZ)

Yakima Health District BULLETIN

Use of the Cepheid GeneXpert to Release Patients from Airborne Isolation

Validation of the MALDI-TOF for the Identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

A retrospective evaluation study of diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF assay, used for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Greece

Tuberculosis 6/7/2018. Objectives. What is Tuberculosis?

Transcription:

Recommendation Promote rapid delivery of specimens to the laboratory Use fluorescent acid-fast staining and promptly transmit results by phone, FAX, or electronically Identify growth as acid-fast and use rapid methods to identify and report isolates as MTBC c as soon as possible Determine the susceptibilities of initial MTBC isolates to first- line drugs in a rapid culture system and report results promptly Benchmark Receipt within 1 day of specimen collection Report AFB b smear result within 1 day from receipt of specimen Report identification results within 14 21 days from receipt of specimen Report susceptibilities to first-line drugs within 17 days of MTBC identification from culture Performance Target a 67% of specimens received within 1 day 92% of specimens with AFB smear result reported within 1 day of receipt 74% of MTBC isolates identified from initial diagnostic specimens reported as MTBC within 21 days of receipt 69% of rifampin results reported for initial diagnostic specimens within 17 days of MTBC identification from culture Healthy People 2020 - Reduce the average time for a laboratory to confirm and report tuberculosis cases using NAAT d Report NAAT within 2 days from receipt of specimen 77% of MTBC cases that are later culture confirmed diagnosed using NAAT (or other direct detection method) within 2 days of receipt a Performance targets represent the median percent of diagnostic specimens meeting benchmark turnaround time (TAT) as calculated from a multicenter evaluation, with the exception of NAAT. TAT benchmarks and target for NAAT are defined within Healthy People 2020 https://www.healthypeople.gov/node/4702/data_details b AFB Acid-fast bacilli c MTBC Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex d NAAT Nucleic Acid Amplification Test

LABORATORY GLOSSARY The following definitions should be used for the purposes of this program. These terms are used in the program announcement. 1. Calendar day: successive days, not working days. This includes days that the laboratory is not open for business (weekends, holidays). 2. Clinical specimen: sample derived directly from a patient (e.g., sputum, CSF) that is submitted to the laboratory for testing. These are also known as primary or raw specimens 3. Individual patient: unique person 4. Isolate: organism obtained by processing and culturing a clinical specimen. This would include, for example, a positive MGIT or other broth tube, or an LJ slant or 7-H-11 plate with visible growth. 5. Initial diagnostic specimen: first clinical specimen received in your laboratory from an individual patient, that has a positive result (identification or drug susceptibility test). This does not include follow-up specimens. This should include clinical specimens referred to another laboratory for testing 6. Initial M. tuberculosis complex isolate: first M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC) isolate recovered from an individual patient. For example, if 2 sputum specimens were submitted on Patient A, one on 9/10 and one on 9/12, and the first M. tuberculosis isolate identified was from the specimen submitted on 9/12, then this would be the initial isolate, even if M. tuberculosis grows from the 9/10 specimen. 7. Jurisdiction: state, city, or county covered by the cooperative agreement program. 8. NAAT: nucleic acid amplification test for the detection of M. tuberculosis complex performed directly on a clinical specimen, e.g. real-time PCR, GenProbe MTD, Cepheid GeneXpert MTB/RIF 9. Direct, or rapid detection test: test for the detection of M. tuberculosis complex performed directly on a clinical specimen (e.g. NAAT, direct HPLC). This does not include species identification tests performed on isolates, such as ACCUPROBE 10. Reference isolate, referred isolate: organism obtained by processing and culturing a clinical specimen in another laboratory that is referred to your laboratory for testing. This includes isolates referred on solid and in liquid media. See Isolate, above. 11. Sediment, Referred sediment: concentrated or processed specimen or centrifuged sediment from a patient, that is sent from another laboratory 12. First-Line Drugs: isoniazid, ethambutol, rifampin, and pyrazinamide. 13. Growth-based DST: Drug susceptibility test that is phenotypic, or growth-based, e.g. MGIT DST or agar-proportion DST. 14. IGRA: Interferon gamma-release assay to detect latent TB infection, performed on blood specimens, e.g. Quantiferon-Gold-in- Tube, T-Spot.TB.

For all TAT indicators: TO CALCULATE TURNAROUND TIMES (TAT) All indicators should be measured in calendar days, not working days and should include weekends and holidays, e.g. a specimen that arrives at the laboratory on a Friday afternoon and is processed with the smear read and the result reported on the following Monday would have a TAT of three days. For all indicators (except the Healthy People 2020 indicator), percent can be determined by the following formula (using specimen receipt in one calendar day for 2017 as an example) Number of specimens received in one calendar day All specimens received in laboratory in 2017 x 100 Receipt of Specimens in the laboratory: This indicator should measure the time (in calendar days) it takes for a clinical specimen to reach the laboratory from time of collection to time of delivery to the laboratory building itself (not the TB section). Weekends and holidays should be included. Calculate the percent reaching the lab within 1, 2, and 3 calendar days. This calculation should be cumulative, i.e., the percent within 3 days includes the percent within 1 and 2 days. Smear results: This indicator should measure the time (in calendar days) it takes for a clinical specimen to have a smear result reported from the time of specimen receipt in the laboratory. Calculate the percent of specimens having smear results reported within 1, 2, and 3 calendar days. This calculation should also be cumulative. ID of MTBC within 21 days: This indicator should measure the time (in calendar days) it takes for an initial diagnostic specimen 1 to be identified as MTB complex (from a culture of the specimen) from the time of specimen receipt in the laboratory. This does not include identification of referred isolates, nor does it pertain to direct detection of MTBC from clinical specimens such as NAA testing. To calculate, determine the number of identifications of MTB complex from initial diagnostic specimens (the denominator), and of those, the number that were identified within 21 days of specimen receipt (the numerator). DST of MTBC within 17 days of identification: This indicator should measure the time (in calendar days) it takes to report the rifampin result (from a culture of MTBC from an initial diagnostic specimen 1 ) after ID of MTBC (see above). This indicator does not include DSTs performed on referred isolates or by molecular testing. To calculate this indicator, determine the number of DSTs performed from initial diagnostic patient specimens (the denominator), and of those, the number that were reported within 17 days of the date of ID of MTBC (the numerator). For laboratories using the DST Reference Center or another reference laboratory, TAT for DST should be calculated in the same manner as above from ID of MTBC in your laboratory to report of rifampin result by your laboratory. Challenges experienced with referral and those encountered internally should be documented. 1 P age

Healthy People (HP) 2020 - Reduce the average time for a laboratory to confirm and report tuberculosis cases using NAA testing: The HP2020 indicator measures number of individuals positive for TB by culture that were detected by a positive NAA test within 48 hours of specimen receipt. First, identify number of individual patients for whom a clinical specimen was processed for smear and culture (workload indicator 2). Of these, determine number of individual patients for whom at least one culture was positive for MTBC (workload indicator 2a). Then, of these individuals positive for MTBC by culture, determine how many of these were initially positive by NAA testing of a clinical specimen in your laboratory (workload indicator 2b). Finally, the HP2020 indicator is of these (2b), how many were reported within 48 hours of specimen receipt. This number should be a subset of 2b, which is a subset of 2a, which is a subset of 2. Although a number is requested for the HP2020 indicator for the Cooperative Agreement data, a percentage can be calculated for use within the laboratory to aid in establishing local laboratory goals and assessing strategies and activities and to compare to HP2020 national goals. To calculate a percentage, divide the HP2020 number (numerator) by number of individual patients for whom at least one culture was positive for MTBC (2a) (denominator). Data checking common errors: For specimen receipt and for smear results, the percent within 3 calendar days should be greater than the percent within 1 and 2 calendar days, and the percent within 2 calendar days should be greater than the percent within 1 calendar day. If the percent within 1 calendar day for receipt of specimens and for smear result is reported as 100%, please double check to make sure you are using calendar days, not working days in your calculations. Laboratories that are not open on weekends or holidays are unlikely to truly meet these indicators 100% of the time in one calendar day. For the Healthy People 2020 indicator, the number indicated (patients with positive NAAT within 48 hours) should not exceed the number of patients tested by NAAT on line 2b of the Workload Data Collection Form. This should be reported as a number, not a percentage. Indicator/Benchmark National Targets: % within recommended time 2016 National averages: % within recommended time Receipt of specimens within 1 day 67% 50% City Labs 80% State Labs 46% Receipt of specimens within 2 days City Labs 88% State Labs 66% Receipt of specimens within 3 days City Labs 95% State Labs 78% Smear results within 1 day of specimen receipt 92% 90% ID of MTBC within 21 days of specimen receipt 74% 73% DST results within 17 days of ID of MTBC 69% 63% HP2020 goal 77% 52% 1 Initial diagnostic specimen: first clinical specimen received in your laboratory from an individual patient that has a positive result (identification or drug susceptibility test). This does not include follow-up specimens. This should include clinical specimens referred to another laboratory for testing. 2 P age

Tuberculosis Elimination Cooperative Agreement Checklist Laboratory Upgrade Component 1. An organizational chart of the laboratory 2. One designated laboratory point of contact with associated contact information 3. A brief description of methods used in the laboratory Description of work flow within the laboratory 4. Element 1 Ensure availability of high-quality and prompt core laboratory services Laboratory workload and turnaround time (TAT) data for 2017 and 2018 (Jan-June) in tabular form (see the Workload Data Template for specific items to include) A narrative on laboratory activities related to each of the TAT recommendations including Annual, internal measurable goals for improving TAT Description of measurable goals for each laboratory-specific benchmark for coming year Description of specific strategies and activities for achieving the stated goals Explanation of potential obstacles to meeting outcomes Update of past year s achievement of previously stated goals/outcomes 5. Element 2* Promote continual advancement of laboratory efficiency and quality assurance through use of local data Update of past year s achievement of previously stated strategies/activities (goals/outcomes) Description of measurable goals/outcomes appropriate for your laboratory volume and services for upcoming calendar year Description of specific strategies and activities for achieving the outcomes Evaluation plan for strategies/activities and progress towards outcomes 6. Element 3* Collaborate with partners (e.g., healthcare providers, TB Control, and laboratory network) to ensure optimal use of laboratory services and timely flow of information Update of past year s achievement of previously stated strategies/activities (goals/outcomes) Description of measurable goals/outcomes appropriate for your laboratory volume and services for upcoming calendar year Description of specific strategies and activities for achieving the outcomes Evaluation plan for strategies/activities and progress towards outcomes 7. Budget A line-item budget reflecting anticipated funding level categorized as follows: Salaries and wages, Fringe benefits, Consultant costs, Equipment, Supplies, Travel, Other Categories, Total Direct Costs, Total Indirect Costs, and Contractual Costs. Justification/description required for each category Each line item should include the number anticipated and per unit cost Requests for personnel support should include the position title and the name of the individual (or if the position is vacant) *A true needs budget is not required (can be submitted if available) for the laboratory for the annual performance report this year. *Laboratory volume considerations for Elements 2 and 3: 2,000 clinical specimens each year should provide at least one measurable outcome for Elements 2 and 3 2,001-6,000 clinical specimens each year should provide at least two measurable outcomes for Elements 2 and 3 >6,000 clinical specimens each year should provide at least three measurable outcomes for Elements 2 and 3

2018 TB Cooperative Agreement Data Template Workload Data Collection Form Description of the laboratory workload (from your jurisdiction only) 1. Total number of clinical specimens (e.g. sputum, CSF, biopsy) processed for smear and culture. Do not include isolates referred from another laboratory. 2. Number of individual patients for whom a clinical specimen was processed for smear and culture. 2a. Of these, report the number of individual patients for whom at least one culture was positive for M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC). 2b. Of these individuals positive for MTBC by culture, how many were initially positive by nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) of a clinical specimen in your laboratory? Note: This number should not include specimens referred for NAAT only (i.e., no culture performed in your laboratory). (Allows assessment of Healthy People 2020 goal) 3. Number of individual patients for whom a reference isolate was received to rule out or confirm the identification of MTBC. This should not include known nontuberculous mycobacteria. 3a. Of these, report the number of individual patients for whom at least one reference isolate identified as MTBC. 4. Number of individual patients for whom growth based MTBC first-line DST was performed (either in-house or, if testing not done in-house, isolates referred to another laboratory for first-line DST). Note: If growth-based DST results were unavailable for a patient (e.g., due to contamination, no growth, or alternative testing algorithm) and molecular drug resistance testing was performed, the molecular results can be reported for the per patient DST workload component. Please do not double count for patients who have both growth-based and molecular results available. 5. Number of individual patients for whom a clinical specimen or processed referred sediment was tested directly with a NAAT. (This includes testing performed in-house and referred testing.) This does not refer to rapid species identification tests performed on isolates (e.g., ACCUPROBE). 5a. Of these, report the number of individual patients for whom a NAAT result was positive for MTBC. Note: For labs that accept referred specimens or sediments for NAAT-only, this number may be higher than data reported for 2b above. 6. Number of individual patients for whom the laboratory referred an isolate of MTBC for genotyping. 7. If applicable, provide the total number of interferon gamma release assays (IGRA) performed by your public health laboratory

2018 TB Cooperative Agreement Data Template Turnaround Time Data Collection Form Description of turnaround times (TAT) for initial diagnostic specimens Promote rapid delivery of clinical specimens to the laboratory. (Benchmark: Specimens should be received in the laboratory within 1 day of specimen collection) Report cumulative percent of specimens received within 1, 2, and 3 calendar days. % of specimens received within 1 calendar day CY2017 % of specimens received within 2 calendar days CY2017 % of specimens received within 3 calendar days CY2017 Use fluorescent acid-fast staining and promptly transmit results by phone, FAX, or electronically. (Benchmark: Report acid-fast microscopy results within 1 day of specimen receipt.) Report cumulative percent of acid-fast smear results reported within 1, 2, and 3 calendar days. % of smear results reported within 1 calendar day CY2017 % of smear results reported within 2 calendar days CY2017 % of smear results reported within 3 calendar days CY2017 Identify growth as acid-fast and use rapid methods to identify isolates from specimens as M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC) as soon as possible and report result promptly (Benchmark: ID within 21 calendar days from receipt of clinical specimen) Report percent MTBC identified from initial diagnostic specimens (e.g., sputum, CSF, etc.) identified within 21 calendar days. % of MTBC identified within 21 calendar days CY2017 CY 2018 (to date) Determine the susceptibilities (DST) of initial MTBC isolates to first-line drugs in a rapid culture system and report results promptly. (Benchmark: DST within 17 calendar days from ID of MTBC) Report the percent of rifampin DST results reported for MTBC isolates from initial diagnostic specimens within 17 days of ID of MTBC. % of rifampin DST results reported within 17 calendar days of ID of MTBC : CY2017 CY 2018 (to date) Healthy People 2020 - Reduce the average time for a laboratory to confirm and report tuberculosis cases using NAAT. Healthy People 2020 goal is 2 days from receipt of clinical specimen for 77% of cases that are later culture confirmed. Of those identified as MTBC by culture, report the number of individual patients for whom a laboratory report of MTBC (i.e., positive NAAT or other positive direct detection method) was provided within 48 hours of clinical specimen receipt. CY2017 CY 2018 (to date)