SHORT COMMUNICATION. Abstract. Kevin R. Murphy, 1 Tom Uryniak, 2 Ubaldo J. Martin 2 and James Zangrilli 2

Similar documents
BUDESONIDE AND FORMOTEROL (SYMBICORT ): Α A REVIEW

Treatment with budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma: a focus on patient-reported outcomes

Therapeutic equivalence of budesonide/ formoterol delivered via breath-actuated inhaler vs pmdi

Dual-controller therapy, or combinations REVIEW DUAL-CONTROLLER REGIMENS I: DATA FROM RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS.

SYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers).

The clinical effectiveness and costeffectiveness. treatment of chronic asthma in children under the age of 12 years

SYNOPSIS. Drug substance(s) Budesonide/formoterol Document No. Edition No. Study code SD Date 16 December 2004

SYNOPSIS A two-stage randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase III, multicenter, 7-month study to assess the efficacy and safety of SYMBICORT

James P. Kemp, MD; Margaret C. Minkwitz, PhD; Catherine M. Bonuccelli, MD; and Marshelle S. Warren, MD

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Co-Primary Outcomes/Efficacy Variables:

SYNOPSIS. First subject enrolled 15 August 2003 Therapeutic confirmatory (III) Last subject completed 03 February 2005

Study designs and PD/Clinical endpoints to demonstrate therapeutic equivalence: European Views

The Relationship among COPD Severity, Inhaled Corticosteroid Use, and the Risk of Pneumonia.

Safety of formoterol in asthma clinical trials: an update

Type of intervention Treatment. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis.

International co-ordinating investigator Dr Dencho Osmanliev, St Sofia, Pulmonary Dept, 19 D Nestorov Str, Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria.

Adjustment of Inhaled Controller Therapy of Asthma in the Yellow Zone, Based on the Inhaler Product Used in the Green Zone Age 16 Years and Older

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Kirthi Gunasekera MD Respiratory Physician National Hospital of Sri Lanka Colombo,

SYNOPSIS THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

Dual-Controller Asthma Therapy: Rationale and Clinical Benefits

SYNOPSIS. Date 15 June 2004

US max daily dose i Food and Drug Administration [2]

GINA. At-A-Glance Asthma Management Reference. for adults, adolescents and children 6 11 years. Updated 2017

#1 cause of school absenteeism in children 13 million missed days annually

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized

Clinical efficacy of montelukast in anti-inflammatory treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis

fluticasone furoate / vilanterol 92/22, 184/22 micrograms inhalation powder (Relvar Ellipta ) SMC No. (966/14) GlaxoSmithKline UK

Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):

Online supplementary material

SYNOPSIS. Study centres This was a multicentre study conducted in 53 centres in Sweden.

Not available 100/6mcg 2 BD formoterol (Fostair MDI) 100/6mcg 33

New Therapies for Asthma

ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage:

Estimated date of first patient enrolled Q III/IV Estimated date of last patient completed Q3 2015

Achieving guideline-based asthma control: does the patient benefit?

W e have shown in a previous meta-analysis of placebo

DO NOT COPY. Asthma is characterized by variable airflow obstruction,

Health technology Four treatments for patients with persistent symptoms of asthma were examined:

SUMMARY THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

Guideline topic: Pharmacological management of asthma Evidence table 4.15: Mometasone Furoate dry powder inhalation evidence

aclidinium 322 micrograms inhalation powder (Eklira Genuair ) SMC No. (810/12) Almirall S.A.

Formoterol versus short-acting beta-agonists as relief medication for adults and children with asthma (Review)

Inhaled corticosteroids versus long-acting beta 2 -agonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Review)

SYNOPSIS. Co-ordinating investigator Not applicable. Study centre(s) This study was conducted in Japan (57 centres).

Policy Evaluation: Step Therapy Prior Authorization of Combination Inhaled Corticosteroid / Long-Acting Beta-Agonists

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Predicting, Preventing and Managing Asthma Exacerbations. Heather Zar Department of Paediatrics & Child Health University of Cape Town South Africa

Is reslizumab effective in improving quality of life and asthma control in adolescent and adult patients with poorly controlled eosinophilic asthma?

Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) What s new in GINA 2016?

II: Moderate Worsening airflow limitations Dyspnea on exertion, cough, and sputum production; patient usually seeks medical

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Title: PGx250: An Exploratory Pharmacogenetic Analysis of Asthma Exacerbations in African-Americans treated

Relvar Ellipta (fluticasone furoate/vilanterol [as trifenatate]) for the treatment of patients with asthma

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: SAM40012 Title: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group comparison of three treatments : 1)

Asthma Management Updates: A Focus on Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonists and Intermittent Inhaled Corticosteroid Dosing

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

ASTRAZENECA v GLAXOSMITHKLINE

TORCH: Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate and Survival in COPD

Stepping down asthma treatment guidelines

Include patients: with a confirmed diagnosis of asthma who have been free of asthma symptoms for 3 months or more.

CDEC FINAL RECOMMENDATION

ASTHMA; COMPARISON OF SALMETEROL /FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE AND FORMOTEROL / BUDESONIDE IN PERSISTENT ASTHMA

Montelukast vs. Inhaled Low-Dose Budesonide as Monotherapy in the Treatment of Mild Persistent Asthma: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial

Inhaled corticosteroids versus long-acting beta 2 -agonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Review)

Abstract Background Theophylline is widely used in the treatment of asthma, and there is evidence that theophylline has antiinflammatory

12/18/2017. Disclosures. Asthma Management Updates: A Focus on Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonists and Intermittent Inhaled Corticosteroid Dosing

ADRB2 Polymorphisms and Budesonide/Formoterol Responses in COPD

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Pharmacological Management of Obstructive Airways in Humans. Introduction to Scientific Research. Submitted: 12/4/08

Meenu Singh, Joseph L. Mathew, Prabhjot Malhi, B.R. Srinivas and Lata Kumar

BEDFORDSHIRE AND LUTON JOINT PRESCRIBING COMMITTEE

Position within the Organisation

Ivax Pharmaceuticals UK Sponsor Submission to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Full Length Original Research Paper

AEROSOL. Indication: /formoterol to. older with pressurized. two inhalations

Mepolizumab (asthma)

Long Term Care Formulary RS -29

Differences in the pharmacodynamics of budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone reflect differences in their therapeutic usefulness in asthma

The FDA Critical Path Initiative

Study No.: SFCA3007 Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the DISKUS

NOVOLIZER BUDESONIDE. Corticosteroids for the treatment of chronic asthma in children under the age of 12 years

KewKM,KarnerC,MindusSM,FerraraG. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Daclizumab improves asthma control in patients with moderate to. severe persistent asthma: A randomized, controlled trial

Sponsor. Generic drug name. Trial indication(s) Protocol number. Protocol title. Clinical trial phase. Study Start/End Dates.

Bronchodilator responsiveness and onset of effect with budesonide/formoterol pmdi in COPD

Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/ formoterol or budesonide: Double-blind study $

Choosing an inhaler for COPD made simple. Dr Simon Hart Castle Hill Hospital

Safety of β2-agonists in asthma

Breakfast Session Prof Neil Barnes Professor of Respiratory Medicine London Chest Hospital & The Royal London Hospital United Kingdom

Once-daily fluticasone furoate alone or combined with vilanterol in persistent asthma

Individual Study Table Referring to Part of the Dossier. Volume:

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Rapid Effects of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Acute Asthma Gustavo J. Rodrigo, MD.

Adherence to asthma controller medication regimens

Cates CJ, Lasserson TJ

Transcription:

SHORT COMMUNICATION Drugs R D 212; 12 (1): 9-14 1179-691/12/1-9 ª 212 Murphy et al., publisher and licensee Adis Data Information BV. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 3. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3./) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original work is properly cited and not altered. The Effect of Budesonide/Formoterol Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler on Predefined Criteria for Worsening Asthma in Four Different Patient Populations with Asthma Kevin R. Murphy, 1 Tom Uryniak, 2 Ubaldo J. Martin 2 and James Zangrilli 2 1 Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE, USA 2 AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA Abstract Background: Previous studies have shown disparities between Black and Hispanic patients compared with other populations in response to asthma medications. Objective: The aim of this analysis was to assess the effect of budesonide/ formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler () and BUD on criteria for asthma worsening, an asthma control metric generally aligned with definitions of moderate asthma exacerbations, across four different populations. Methods: Data were from four 12-week, randomized, double-blind, US studies of treatment in patients aged 12 years or older with varying asthma severities and of varying races. Predefined asthma and withdrawals were assessed as secondary study endpoints. Study I (NCT651651) includes data from predominantly White patients with mild to moderate asthma who were randomized to 16/9 mg twice daily (; n = 123) or BUD pmdi 16 mg (n = 121). Study II (NCT6522) includes data from predominantly White patients with moderate to severe asthma who were randomized to 32/9 mg (n = 124) or BUD pmdi 32 mg (n = 19). Study III (NCT72325) included self-reported Black patients with moderate to severe asthma who were randomized to 32/9 mg (n = 153) or BUD dry powder inhaler 36 mg (n = 148). Study IV (NCT419757) included self-reported Hispanic patients with moderate to severe asthma who were randomized to 32/9 mg (n = 127) or BUD pmdi 32 mg (n = 123). Patients were to be withdrawn from the studies if they developed an asthma event, as determined by criteria, except for night-time awakenings, where withdrawal was left to the study physician s judgment.

1 Murphy et al. Results: Overall, fewer patients in the studies (study I, II, III, and IV, respectively) experienced 1 in the BUD/FM group (18.7%, 29.8%, 37.3%, 25.2%) versus the BUD group (21.5%, 44.%, 45.3%, 31.7%); only study II results showed a statistically significant difference between treatments. Fewer patients with moderate to severe asthma (studies II, III, and IV) were withdrawn 1 in the BUD/FM group (1.5%, 11.8%, 3.1%, respectively) than in the BUD group (2.2%, 18.9%, 6.5%, respectively); however, percentages were similar in the BUD/FM (7.3%) and BUD (6.6%) groups in patients with mild to moderate asthma (study I). Conclusions: Predefined rates were numerically or significantly lower for patients with asthma receiving versus BUD, regardless of race or disease severity. Differences between the and BUD groupsweresmallerinpatientswithmildtomoderateasthmathaninthosewith moderate to severe asthma, most likely because patients with milder disease had lower rates. Overall, these findings support the efficacy of BUD/FM pmdi in achieving asthma control in patients with moderate to severe asthma. Introduction Asthma disproportionately affects racial and ethnic populations. In the US in 26, the ageadjusted, asthma-related mortality rates were approximately 3 times higher in non-hispanic Blacks than in non-hispanic Whites and Hispanics. [1] Although typical safety and efficacy studies are underpowered or too short in duration to make definitive conclusions regarding severe asthma exacerbations (i.e. those requiring systemic corticosteroids), important insight into the efficacy of medications can be gained from analyzing related moderate exacerbation characterized by a sustained loss of asthma control (beyond normal day-today variation) that does not meet the definition of a severe exacerbation. [2] For the purpose of asthma research protocol development, moderate exacerbation have been captured using various terminology, such as asthma deterioration, [3] asthma worsenings, [4] and asthma. [5] Few US studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting b 2 - adrenergic agonist (LABA) combination therapy in Black or Hispanic patients with asthma. The efficacy of budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FM) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pmdi) has been evaluated in randomized, double-blind studies in predominantly White patients with mild to moderate asthma [6] and predominantly White, [5] Black, [7] and Hispanic [8] patients with moderate to severe asthma. Results for a definition, which encompass moderate to severe asthma deteriorations, are presented as these findings have not been presented previously in detail or compared across patient populations. Methods Table I includes a brief summary of the studies that were included in this exploratory analysis. Additional details of the individual studies, including study design and methods, have been previously described. [5-8] This analysis of asthma (table II) includes data from patients aged 12 years with asthma who were enrolled in randomized, double-blind, 12-week US studies that differed according to baseline asthma severity and/or race or ethnicity (table III). Only the BUD/FM and BUD treatment arms, which were common to all four studies, are presented; these studies were not originally powered for comparison of asthma. Statistical methods for this analysis are similar to those described previously. [5-8] Comparisons among treatment groups of percentages of patients

and Asthma Events in Four Populations 11 Table I. Study treatments and entry criteria [5-8] Study Run-in Interventions Race Asthma severity I (NCT651651) [6] Placebo pmdi 16/9 mg (n= 123) Not specified Mild to moderate BUD pmdi 16 mg (n= 121) FM DPI 9 mg (n= 114) Placebo (n = 122) II (NCT6522) [5] BUD pmdi 16 mg 32/9 mg (n= 124) Not specified Moderate to severe BUD pmdi 32 mg (n= 19) BUD pmdi 32 mg + FM DPI 9 mg (n= 115) FM DPI 9 mg (n= 123) Placebo (n = 125) III (NCT72325) [7] BUD DPI 18 mg 32/9 mg (n= 156) Self-reported Black a Moderate to severe BUD DPI 36 mg (n= 155) IV (NCT419757) [8] BUD pmdi 16 mg 32/9 mg (n= 127) BUD pmdi 32 mg (n= 123) Self-reported Hispanic b Moderate to severe a Self-reported as African, African American, or African Caribbean. b Self-reported as Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, South or Central American, Caribbean, or mixed Hispanic. = twice daily; BUD = budesonide; DPI = dry powder inhaler; FM = formoterol; pmdi = pressurized metered-dose inhaler. who experienced 1 and of percentages of patients who withdrew because of such an event were performed by w 2 test (study I) or Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with adjustment for treatment (studies III and IV) and ICS dose (medium or high; studies II, III, and IV) at study entry. Results Baseline demographics were similar across studies (table II). As expected, patients with mild to moderate asthma had better pulmonary function than those with moderate to severe asthma. The percentage of patients with moderate to severe asthma who experienced 1 was lower in the BUD/FM groups versus the BUD group, with statistically significant differences observed in study II (p <.5) [figure 1]. In all studies, the most commonly met criterion was night-time awakening. The criterion of clinical exacerbation included the following subcategories that were not mutually exclusive: study I (BUD/FM: one patient [one emergency department (ED) visit, one event of disallowed asthma medication use], BUD: three patients [one ED visit, three of disallowed asthma medication use]); study II (BUD/FM: seven patients [three ED visits, seven of disallowed asthma medication use], BUD: five patients [one ED visit, four of disallowed asthma medication use]); study III (BUD/FM: three patients [two of disallowed asthma medication use, one event of nebulized bronchodilator use, three of oral corticosteroid use], BUD: three patients [one ED visit, three of disallowed asthma medication use, one event of nebulized bronchodilator use, and three of oral corticosteroid use]); study IV (BUD/FM: seven patients [two ED visits, two hospitalizations one multiple Table II. Predefined criteria for asthma [5-8] 1. predose FEV 1 2% from randomization or a decrease to <4% a of predicted normal 2. 12 Actuations of albuterol/day on 3 days within a 7-day period 3. PEF 2% from baseline on 3 days within a 7-day period 4. 2 Nights with an awakening asthma requiring rescue medication within any 7-day period b 5. Clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospitalization, or use of an asthma medication not allowed by the protocol a For study I, <45%. b Patients experiencing only the night-time awakening criterion could remain in the study if the investigator determined that they were clinically well and stable. FEV 1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second; PEF = peak expiratory flow.

12 Murphy et al. [5-8] a,b Table III. Patient demographic and baseline clinical characteristics Study IV [8] (Hispanic patients; moderate to severe asthma) Study III [7] (Black patients; moderate to severe asthma) Study II [5] (predominantly White patients; moderate to severe asthma) Characteristic Study I [6] (predominantly White patients; mild to moderate asthma) BUD pmdi 32 mg (n = 123) 32/9 mg (n = 127) BUD DPI 36 mg (n = 148) 32/9 mg (n = 153) BUD pmdi 32 mg (n = 19) 32/9 mg (n = 124) BUD pmdi 16 mg (n = 121) 16/9 mg (n = 123) Male [n (%)] 46 (37.4) 46 (38.) 44 (35.5) 38 (34.9) 44 (28.8) 61 (41.2) 43 (33.9) 43 (35.) Age [y] 37.2 (15.7) 37.1 (15.9) 41.8 (15.5) 4.7 (14.2) 38.6 (13.8) 39.8 (15.4) 39.8 (16.6) 37. (14.9) White/Black/other [n] 18/9/6 12/11/8 98/18/8 84/17/8 /153/ /148/ NA NA Asthma duration [y] 2.2 (12.5) 19.5 (13.) 23.1 (15.1) 23.2 (16.) 21.2 (15.1) 21.6 (15.3) Data not available Data not available ICS dose [mg/d] 347 (144) 356 (19) 57 (225) 59 (252) 552 (232) 551 (263) 583 (282) 67 (294) % Predicted FEV 1 at screening 75.6 (8.5) 75.1 (7.6) 67.9 (1.5) 68.7 (1.7) 68.5 (12.) 66.8 (12.) 68.3 (1.6) 68. (12.3) % FEV 1 reversibility at baseline 18.2 (7.3) 19.4 (6.7) 2.5 (11.8) 22.7 (13.3) 24.3 (15.1) 25.8 (16.9) 27.7 (18.9) 25.3 (14.7) a Values are presented as mean (standard deviation) unless noted otherwise. b Study I: NCT651651; study II: NCT6522; study III: NCT72325; study IV: NCT41975. = twice daily; BUD = budesonide; DPI = dry powder inhaler; FEV 1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FM = formoterol; ICS = inhaled corticosteroid; NA = not applicable; pmdi = pressurized metered-dose inhaler. significant/active comorities and one viral infection, seven of disallowed asthma medication use], BUD: two patients [two of disallowed medication use]). Overall, withdrawal rates were lower in studies I and IV than in studies II and III (figure 1). The percentage of patients with mild to moderate asthma (study I) who withdrew 1 was similar in the BUD/FM and BUD groups. Percentages of patients with moderate to severe asthma (studies II, III, and IV) who withdrew 1 were numerically lower in the BUD/FM versus BUD groups, regardless of race. Additional results from the individual studies have been previously described. [5-8] Conclusions Predefined asthma are increasingly being utilized in clinical research studies as a sensitive composite control metric. An metric encompassing measures of pulmonary function, symptoms, rescue medication use, and the need for additional medications was investigated in the present analysis. While individual studies were not powered for statistical analyses, rates in four 12-week, randomized studies consistently showed numerical or significant differences favoring over BUD across White, Black, and Hispanic patients, regardless of disease severity. Notably, the results of this analysis showing similar rates among patients of differing racial backgrounds is consistent with the primary analyses showing the efficacy of BUD/ FM pmdi in Blacks [7] and Hispanics, [8] as well as a study demonstrating the efficacy of ICS/LABA in Blacks. [9] Additional discussion of findings and limitations of the individual studies have been previously discussed. [5-8] Differences between the and BUD groups were smaller in patients with mild to moderate asthma than in patients with moderate to severe asthma, most likely because patients with milder disease had overall lower rates. These data further support the efficacy of in achieving asthma control in patients with moderate to severe asthma, regardless of race.

and Asthma Events in Four Populations 13 5 a 4 3 2 1 18.7 21.5 2.4 Predefined 2.5 2.5 2.4 13.8 c 32/9 μg (n = 153) d BUD DPI 36 μg (n = 148) 5 16.5 2.5 7.3 6.6 5 4 3 2 b 29.8* 1 44. 3.2 6.4 Predefined 2.8 1.6 1.6 4.6 19.4 26.6 5.6 4.6 1.5* 2.2 5 4 3 2 37.3 45.3 16/9 μg (n = 123) BUD pmdi 16 μg (n = 121) Predefined 3.1 29.1 18.9 4 3 2 25.2 31.7 32/9 μg (n = 124) BUD pmdi 32 μg (n = 19) 32/9 μg (n = 127) BUD pmdi 32 μg (n = 123) Predefined 18.9 23.6 1 5.4 1.3.7. 7.2 1 2. 2. 11.8 1 4.1 1.6 1.6 5.5 8.9 5.5 1.6 3.1 6.5 Fig. 1. Percentages of patients with 1 (overall and individual ) and withdrawals in (a) study I (predominantly White patients with mild to moderate asthma), (b) study II (predominantly White patients with moderate to severe asthma), (c) study III (Black patients), and (d) study IV (Hispanic patients). = twice daily; BUD = budesonide; DPI = dry powder inhaler; FEV 1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FM = formoterol; PEF = peak expiratory flow; pmdi = pressurized metereddose inhaler; * p <.5 vs BUD.

14 Murphy et al. Acknowledgments This study was supported by AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA. Medical writing services, provided by Lisa Feder, PhD (Scientific Connexions, Newtown, PA, USA), were funded by AstraZeneca LP. K.R. Murphy, T. Uryniak, U.J. Martin, and J. Zangrilli made substantial contributions to the analysis and interpretation of data, drafted and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, and provided final approval of the version to be published. K.R. Murphy is a(n) consultant and advisor to and has received lecture fees and grants from AstraZeneca LP. T. Uryniak, U.J. Martin, and J. Zangrilli are shareholders and employees of AstraZeneca LP. References 1. American Lung Association. Trends in asthma mority and mortality. July 211 [online]. Available from URL: http:// www.lungusa.org/finding-cures/our-research/trend-reports/ asthma-trend-report.pdf [Accessed 211 Oct 21] 2. Reddel HK, Taylor DR, Bateman ED, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: asthma control and exacerbations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 29; 18 (1): 59-99 3. Nathan RA, Nolte H, Pearlman DS, P4334 Study Investigators. Twenty-six-week efficacy and safety study of mometasone furoate/formoterol 2/1 mg combination treatment in patients with persistent asthma previously receiving medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Allergy Asthma Proc 21; 31 (4): 269-79 4. Kavuru M, Melamed J, Gross G, et al. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate combined in a new powder inhalation device for the treatment of asthma: a randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2; 15 (6 Pt 1): 118-16 5. Noonan M, Rosenwasser LJ, Martin P, et al. Efficacy and safety of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurised metered-dose inhaler in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe asthma: a randomised clinical trial. Drugs 26; 66 (5): 2235-54 6. Corren J, Korenblat PE, Miller CJ, et al. Twelve-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of the efficacy and tolerability of budesonide and formoterol in one metered-dose inhaler compared with budesonide alone and formoterol alone in adolescents and adults with asthma. Clin Ther 27 May; 29 (5): 823-43 7. Spector SL, Martin UJ, Uryniak T, et al. Budesonide/ formoterol pressurized metered dose inhaler versus budesonide: a randomized controlled trial in Black patients with asthma. J Asthma 212; 49 (1): 7-7 8. Zangrilli J, Mansfield LE, Uryniak T, et al. Efficacy of budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler versus budesonide pressurized metered-dose inhaler alone in Hispanic adults and adolescents with asthma: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 211; 17 (3): 258-65 9. Bailey W, Castro M, Matz J, et al. Asthma exacerbations in African Americans treated for 1 year with combination fluticasone propionate and salmeterol or fluticasone propionate alone. Curr Med Res Opin 28; 24 (6): 1669-82 Correspondence: Kevin R. Murphy, MD, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Allergy, Asthma & Pediatric Pulmonology, 148 Hospital Road, Boys Town, NE 681, USA. E-mail: kevin.murphy@boystown.org