The Clinical Evaluation of the Medtronic AVE Driver Coronary Stent System

Similar documents
Final Clinical and Angiographic Results From a Nationwide Registry of FIREBIRD Sirolimus- Eluting Stent: Firebird In China (FIC) Registry (PI R. Gao)

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

Are Asian Patients Different? - Updates Of Biomatrix Experience In Regional Settings: BEACON II (3 Yr F up) &

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

FFR-guided Jailed Side Branch Intervention

Resolute in Bifurcation Lesions: Data from the RESOLUTE Clinical Program

Single Center Consecutive Registry Of The New Atrium Flyer Coronary Stent System

BIOFREEDOM: Polymer free Biolimus A9 eluting

A Polymer-Free Dual Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trial Versus Polymer-Based DES.

The SYNTAX-LE MANS Study

Lessons learned From The National PCI Registry

Primary Results of the Assessment of Catheter-based Interrogation and Standard Techniques for Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement Study

eluting Stents The SPIRIT Trials

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

TCTAP Upendra Kaul MD,DM,FACC,FSCAI,FAMS,FCSI

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

Insight from the CACTUS trial Coronary Bifurcation Application of the Crush

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G.

LM stenting - Cypher

DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

PCI for Long Coronary Lesion

Unprotected LM intervention

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

Clinical Study Age Differences in Long Term Outcomes of Coronary Patients Treated with Drug Eluting Stents at a Tertiary Medical Center

Run-Lin Gao, MD, FACC. On Behalf of I-LOVE-IT Trial Investigators

Prevention of Coronary Stent Thrombosis and Restenosis

New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

Unprotected Left Main Stenting: Patient Selection and Recent Experience. Alaide Chieffo. S. Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

Drug eluting stents. Where are we now and what can we expect in 2003? Tony Gershlick Leicester

Outcomes of Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffolds with Improved Technique in an Expanded Patient Population: The ABSORB IV Randomized Trial Gregg W.

The MAIN-COMPARE Registry

Bioabsorbable Scaffolding: Technology and Clinical Update. PD Dr. Nicolas Diehm, MD, FESC Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Count Down to COMBAT

Biolimus A9 Drug-Eluting Stents: Technical Aspects and a Comprehensive Review of the EU, Asia-Pacific, and US Clinical Trial Program

Dr. Robert J. van Geuns. Thoraxcenter ErasmusMC Rotterdam On behalf of Dr. Jean Fajadet and Co-investigators

The Vascular Concepts - PRONOVA Durable Polymer Sirolimus Eluting Stent A Review of Indian Registry Results

Results of the Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial for Long Lesions (Long WRIST) Studies

Percutaneous Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Disease

BIOFLOW V Comparison of UltraThin Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Polymer with Thin Everolimus- Eluting Durable Polymer Stents

DISRUPT CAD. Todd J. Brinton, MD Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine Adjunct Professor of Bioengineering Stanford University

Coronary Artery Stenosis. Insight from MAIN-COMPARE Study

PCI for Left Anterior Descending Artery Ostial Stenosis

Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I

C. W. Hamm, B. Cremers, H. Moellmann, S. Möbius-Winkler, U. Zeymer, M. Vrolix, S. Schneider, U. Dietz, M. Böhm, B. Scheller

What is the Optimal Triple Anti-platelet Therapy Duration in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Drug-eluting Stents Implantation?

SKG Congress, 2015 EVOLVE II. Stephan Windecker

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusions:

Drug Eluting Stents: Bifurcation and Left Main Approach

IVUS vs FFR Debate: IVUS-Guided PCI

A Novel Low Pressure Self Expanding Nitinol Coronary Stent (vprotect): Device Design and FIH Experience

Declaration of conflict of interest. Nothing to disclose

Mid-term results from real-world REPARA registry. Felipe Hernandez, on behalf of the REPARA investigators

Between Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

Fractional Flow Reserve: Review of the latest data

Insights from the Magmaris Clinical Data: BIOSOLVE II and BIOSOLVE III 12 Month Follow Up

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

INDEX 1 INTRODUCTION DEVICE DESCRIPTION CLINICAL PROGRAM FIRST-IN-MAN CLINICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE AMAZONIA SIR STENT...

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

Medtronic Symposium The Complex Bifurcation Patient: new insights into stent selection

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

Evaluation COMBO s Healing Profile The EGO-COMBO Serial OCT Study

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Repositionable Self-expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Suboptimal for

Massimiliano Fusaro, MD on behalf of ISAR-STATH Investigators. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München Munich - Germany

2010 Korean Society of Cardiology Spring Scientific Session Korea Japan Joint Symposium. Seoul National University Hospital Cardiovascular Center

Intervention: How and to which extent is technology helping us?

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

Culprit Lesion Remodeling and Long-term (> 5years) Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

REFCTRI/2010/ CTRI Website URL -

PCIs on Intermediate Lesions NCDR Cath-PCI Registry

NEW INTERVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES

OCT guidance for distal LM lesions

Biodegradable Stents An update and work-in

OCT Guided Atherectomy: Initial Results of the VISION Trial Using the Pantheris Catheter. Patrick Muck, MD

Inspiron Stent. Clinical Research Program. Pedro A. Lemos MD PhD. Heart Institute InCor University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil

Surgery Grand Rounds

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 35, No. 5, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /00/$20.

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

PCI for In-Stent Restenosis. CardioVascular Research Foundation

Can Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO!

Michael Mack, M.D. Baylor Healthcare System Heart Hospital Baylor Plano Dallas, TX

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Late Loss Is The Single Best Parameter For Estimating Stent-Based Restenosis Resistance

Fractional Flow Reserve and the Results of the FAME Study

Update from the Tryton IDE study

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

FAME STUDY: 2-year Follow-Up & CLINICAL SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

eucalimus - First Experience

Final Kissing Ballooning Returns? The analysis of COBIS II registry

Emerging Cardiac Technologies. Thomas D. Conley, MD FACC FSCAI BHHI Primary Care Symposium February 27, 2015

Biolimus-Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Durable Polymer: A Randomised, Non-Inferiority Trial

Late Breaking Clinical Trials: The Consistent CTO study

Polymer-Free Stent CX - ISAR

FFR vs. icecg in Coronary Bifurcations (FIESTA) - preliminary results. Dobrin Vassilev MD, PhD National Heart Hospital Sofia, Bulgaria

FANTOM II trial: Clinical results from the Fantom Sirolimus-Eluting BRS. Norbert Frey, MD University of Kiel, Germany

CYPHER (Polymer-based Sirolimus-eluting DES) New Stent Platforms. Campbell Rogers, M.D. Chief Technology Officer

DES In-stent Restenosis

Nobori Clinical Studies Up-dates. Gian Battista DANZI, M.D. Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Italy

Transcription:

The Clinical Evaluation of the Medtronic AVE Driver Coronary Stent System A prospective, multicenter, non randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Medtronic AVE Driver Coronary Stent System in subjects with de novo and restenotic lesions of native coronary arteries. Principal Investigator: Michael H. Sketch Jr., MD, FACC Duke University Medical Center

Sites Enrolling in Driver Registry Investigator Site Name Location Michael Ball, MD* St. Vincent Hospital Indianapolis, IN Dean Kereiakes, MD* Barry Rutherford, MD* Michael H. Sketch Jr., MD* Robert C. Stoler, MD* Stephen Yakubov, MD Greg Braden, MD* Rakesh Prashad, MD* Jeffrey Chambers, MD* Thomas McGarry, MD* Magdi Ghali, MD* Lowell Satler, MD* Patrik Zetterlund, MD* Joseph Fredi, MD A. Charles Rabinowitz, MD James O Toole, MD Peter J. Counihan, MD* D. Scott Gantt, DO Michael Ring, MD Stylianos Papadakos, MD R. David Fish, MD* Jeffrey S. Garrett, MD* Timothy Byrne, DO* The Christ Hospital St. Luke s Hospital Duke University Medical Center Baylor University Medical Center Riverside Methodist Hospital Forsyth Medical Center Ocala Regional Medical Center Mercy Hospital OU Medical Center-Presbyterian Towers Mercy Medical Center Washington Hospital Center Salinas Valley Memorial Hospital St. Thomas Hospital Methodist Hospital UPMC Shadyside Hospital UPMC Presbyterian Hospital Scott & White Memorial Hospital Sacred Heart Medical Center NY Hospital Queens St. Luke s Episcopal Hospital The Western Pennsylvania Hospital Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center Cincinnati, OH Kansas City, MO Durham, NC Dallas, TX Columbus, OH Winston-Salem, NC Ocala, FL Coon Rapids, MN Oklahoma City, OK Des Moines, IA Washington, DC Salinas, CA Nashville, TN San Antonio, TX Pittsburgh, PA Pittsburgh, PA Temple, TX Spokane, WA Flushing, NY Houston, TX Pittsburgh, PA Phoenix, AZ * These sites enrolled patients in angiographic subset N=101 patients.

Methodology Study population: Patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease due to stenotic lesions of the native coronary arteries that are amenable to percutaneous stenting de novo or restenotic target lesion Lesion length <30 mm in length Target vessel reference diameter >3.0 mm and <4.0 mm Driver stent sizes used: 3.0, 3.5 and 4.0 mm diameter stents in 9, 12 and 18 mm lengths Enrollment: 298 subjects at 23 sites in the United States

Endpoints Primary: MACE at 180 days defined as a composite of death, Q-wave and non-q-wave MI, emergent bypass surgery, or target lesion revascularization (repeat PTCA or CABG) Secondary: TVF in-hospital, at 14 days, 30 days, 180 days, and 270 days Acute success Clinically driven TLR at 180 and 270 days Binary angiographic restenosis at 180 days Late loss at 180 days Ischemic, bleeding and vascular complications

Patient Demographics Number of patients 298 Age (yr) 62.6 ±10.8 Male 68.1% Risk Factors Diabetes 27.6% Hypertension on Rx 68.4% Current smoker 28.8% Family history of CAD 49.1% Hyperlipidemia on Rx 75.9%

Patient Demographics Cardiac History Prior MI 28.1% History of PTCA 23.0% History of CABG 6.0% Cardiac Status/Angina Class Stable 31.2% Unstable 47.0% Angina Class CCS III or IV 55.3% LV Ejection Fraction (mean) 55.9 ± 9.8%

Baseline Angiography Major Coronary Arteries >50% Stenosed Single 66.8% Double 22.8% Triple 10.4% Target Lesion Vessel LAD 45.4% LCX 19.4% RCA 34.5% Left Main 0.7%

Baseline Angiography ACC/AHA Lesion Class A 14.8% B1 34.2% B2 (or higher) 45.4% C 5.6% Target Lesion Morphology Calcification (moderate to severe) 14.1% Eccentric lesion 41.2% Thrombus 1.1% Angulation >45 degrees 7.0%

Procedure Characteristics % of Patients Implanted with: 1 stent 82.9% 2 stents 16.4% 3 stents 0.67% Number of stents/lesion (mean) 1.18 Lesion length (mm) 11.04 ±4.25

Safety Results Incidence of MACE In-hospital 180 days 270 days Death 0.0% 0.7%* 1.3%* Q-wave MI 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Non-Q-wave MI 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% TLR 0.0% 3.4% 7.0% Combined MACE 1.7% 5.7% 10.1% TVR 0.0% 4.4% 8.1% TVF (TVR + MI + cardiac death) 1.7% 6.7% 9.7% Stent thrombosis 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% *deaths were non-cardiac

Safety Results 180 days by Diabetic Status N=215 pts N=82 pts Incidence of MACE to 180 days Diabetic Non-Diabetic Death 0.5%* 1.2%* Q-wave MI 0.0% 0.0% Non-Q-wave MI 1.9% 1.2% emergent CABG 0.0% 0.0% TLR 3.3% 3.7% Combined MACE 5.6% 6.1% TVR 4.2% 4.9% TVF (TVR + MI + cardiac death) 6.1% 6.1% Stent thrombosis 0.0% 0.0% *deaths were non-cardiac

Safety Results 270 days by Diabetic Status N=215 pts N=82 pts Incidence of MACE to 270 days Diabetic Non-Diabetic Death 0.9%* 2.4%* Q-wave MI 0.0% 0.0% Non-Q-wave MI 1.9% 1.2% emergent CABG 0.0% 0.0% TLR 5.6% 11.0% Combined MACE 8.4% 14.6% TVR 6.5% 12.2% TVF (TVR + MI + cardiac death) 8.4% 13.4% Stent thrombosis 0.0% 0.0% *deaths were non-cardiac

Efficacy Results Device success 100% (298/298) Lesion success 100% (298/298) Procedure success 98.3% (293/298) Kaplan-Meier estimates at: 180 days 270 days MACE-free at 270 days 93.9% 87.7% TLR-free at 270 days 96.2% 91.2% TVR-free at 270 days 95.2% 90.0% TVF-free at 270 days 92.8% 88.3%

Restenosis Risk Factors Diabetes 27.6% Reference Vessel Diameter 3.07 ± 0.47 mm Lesion Length 11.04 ± 4.25 mm

Criteria Angiographic Results (QCA) Reference vessel diameter (mm) In-lesion minimum lumen diameter (mm) In-lesion diameter stenosis (%) In-stent minimum lumen diameter (mm) In-stent diameter stenosis (%) In-lesion acute gain (mm) In-stent acute gain (mm) In-lesion late loss (mm) In-lesion loss index ratio (mm/mm) In-stent late loss (mm) In-stent loss index ratio (mm/mm) Binary restenosis in stent (%) Binary restenosis in lesion (%) Pre-procedure 3.07 ± 0.47 1.01 ± 0.38 67.1 ± 11.1 Postprocedure 3.01 ± 0.48 2.55 ± 0.50 15.0 ± 11.4 2.90 ± 0.41 3.0 ± 10.5 1.55 ± 0.51 1.93 ± 0.44 180-day 3.02 ± 0.48 1.93 ± 0.58 36.1 ± 15.0 1.99 ± 0.62 34.2 ± 16.3 0.62 ± 0.56 0.38 ± 0.37 0.94 ± 0.54 0.49 ± 0.29 In lesion defined as measurements within the stented segment plus 5 mm proximal and distal to the stent margins. 15.7 15.7