Mandibular Protraction Appliance IV

Similar documents
A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

2008 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. Correction of Asymmetry with a Mandibular Propulsion Appliance

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

CLASS II CORRECTION SIMPLIFIED

Nonextraction Management of Class II Malocclusion Using Powerscope: A Case Report

Applicability of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device as a Class II Corrector in Young Adults

Flip-Lock HERBST Appliance COMFORT. CUSTOMIZATION. ADVANCED ENGINEERING.

The Tip-Edge appliance and

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

Integrative Orthodontics with the Ribbon Arch By Larry W. White, D.D.S., M.S.D.

Archwire Insertion and Disengagement Instruments Technique Guide

An estimated 25-30% of all orthodontic patients can benefit from maxillary

Correction of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion by Fixed Functional Class II Corrector Appliance: Case Report

ORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS

rocky mountain orthodontics functionaleducation

The Inman Aligner. The Inman Aligner,* a versatile removable

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

Condyle/glenoid fossa changes of Class II patients treated with the edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition period

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

From Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

eral Maxillary y Molar Distalization with Sliding Mechanics: Keles Slider

The management of impacted

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

Focus on Functional Appliances

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

THE JASPER JUMPER APPLIANCE; USAGE, EFFECTS AND RECENT MODIFICATIONS

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

Angle Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary dental protrusion and missing mandibular first molars*

We Give Back. Reduce Emergency Visits! ATTACHMENTS. No More Poking Archwires! Crimpable Mini Stops. Tooth Tone Crimpable Mini Stops

FIXED FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCE: POWERSCOPE -A CASE SERIES

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

With judicious treatment planning, the clinical

O r i g i n a l A r t i c l e

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

Delta Force. Bracket System. Putting you in the driver s seat for ultimate control

A Novel Method of Altering the Buccal Segment Relationship

Orthodontic treatment for jaw defor. Sakamoto, T; Sakamoto, S; Harazaki, Author(s) Yamaguchi, H. Journal Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College, 4

MOLAR DISTALIZATION WITH MODIFIED GRAZ IMPLANT SUPPORTED PENDULUM SPRINGS. A CASE REPORT.

Plus Combines Traditional Twin Bracket Treatment With Self-Ligation Convenience

Space Closure Biomechanics Applied Using The MBT System Technique

Class II Correction with the Cantilever Bite Jumper

Intraoral molar-distalization appliances that

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

Introducing the Clarity SL Self-Ligating Appliance System

Evaluation of Clinical Effectiveness of Churro Jumper Appliance in the Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Retrognathic Mandible

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

6. Timing for orthodontic force

PRE-FINISHER APPLIANCE AND BONDABLE LINGUAL RETAINERS. tportho.com cosmeticbraces.com. POD_TPOC_09_PreFinisher_Retainers_2015, Rev.

Angle Class I malocclusion with anterior open bite treated with extraction of permanent teeth

Available online at International Journal of Current Research Vol. 10, Issue, 10, pp , October, 2018

Molar distalisation with skeletal anchorage

Treatment Effects of Twin-Block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV in the Correction of Class II Malocclusion

Treatment of a Patient with Class I Malocclusion and Severe Tooth Crowding Using Invisalign and Fixed Appliances

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

A Method for Stabilizing a Lingual Fixed Retainer in Place Prior to Bonding

ortho case report Sagittal First international magazine of orthodontics By Dr. Luis Carrière Special Reprint

Correction of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion with a mandibular protraction appliances and multiloop edgewise archwire technique

Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; June 2014: Vol.-3, Issue- 3, P

Case Report. profile relaxed relaxed smiling. How would you treat this malocclusion?

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

essentialstm cutting your consumable costs brackets tubes wires springs instruments T:

Expansion screws. Perfect in form, function and design.

INDICATIONS. Fixed Appliances are indicated when precise tooth movements are required

Holy Nexus of Variable Wire Cross-section: New Vistas in Begg s Technique

Case Report: Early Correction of Class III Malocclusion with alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion And Constriction (Alt-RAMEC) and Face Mask Therapy

#39 Ortho-Tain, Inc

Transverse malocclusion, posterior crossbite and severe discrepancy*

Enhanced Control in the Transverse Dimension using the Unitek MIA Quad Helix System by Dr. Sven G. Wiezorek

clinical orthodontics article

Expansion/Arch Development

The Rondeau System. Brackets, Bands, Buccal Tubes and Archwires. Orthodontic supplies recommended by Dr. Brock Rondeau

FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCES

ISW for the treatment of moderate crowding dentition with unilateral second molar impaction

TWO PHASE FOR A BETTER FACE!! TWIN BLOCK AND HEADGEAR FOLLOWED BY FIXED THERAPY FOR CLASS II CORRECTION

Low-Force Mechanics Nonextraction. Estimated treatment time months (Actual 15 mos 1 week). Low-force mechanics.

One of the most common orthodontic A COMPARISON OF TWO MAXILLARY MOLAR DISTALIZING APPLIANCES WITH THE DISTAL JET

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

Canine Extrusion Technique with SmartClip Self-Ligating Brackets

Fixed Twin Blocks. Guidelines for case selection are similar to those for removable Twin Block appliances.

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

TransForce 2. Arch Developer Appliances Clinical Cases. New Horizons In Orthodontics

ISW for the treatment of adult anterior crossbite with severe crowding combined facial asymmetry case

Management of Severe Class II Malocclusion with Fixed Functional Appliance: Forsus

Crowding and protrusion treated by unusual extractions

Maxillary Growth Control with High Pull Headgear- A Case Report

Conservative treatment of Angle Class III malocclusion with anterior crossbite

Early Mixed Dentition Period

Non extraction treatment of growing skeletal class II malocclusion with Forsus Fatigue Resistant Appliance- A Case Report

Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) prior to combined Le Fort I and sagittal osteotomies: A case report

Skeletal and dental Class II malocclusion, with anterior open bite and accentuated overjet*

Transcription:

CARLOS M. COELHO FILHO, DDS, MSD Articles published by Pancherz 1,2 on the Herbst* appliance in the last two decades seem to have stimulated the development of several other fixed appliances that work according to the same mechanical philosophy, without requiring unusual patient compliance. 3-11 In 1995, I presented two versions of a non-compliance device that could be made in the office, called the Mandibular Protraction Appliance** I and II. 11,12 These appliances were soon replaced by an improved MPA III. 13,14 The latest version, the MPA IV,** is much easier to construct and install, and much more comfortable for the patient. The MPA IV is made up of the following parts: T tube Upper molar locking pin Mandibular rod Mandibular archwire *Registered trademark of Dentaurum, Inc., 10 Pheasant Run, Newtown, PA 18940. **Patent pending. Fig. 1 Two sections of.040" stainless steel tubing spot-welded together prior to soldering. Fig. 4 Molar locking pin inserted through smaller tube and marked at end of tube. Fig. 2 T tube after soldering. Fig. 3 Excess portions of tubes cut off. Fig. 5 Molar locking pin bent gently with threeprong plier. 18 2001 JCO, Inc. JCO/JANUARY 2001

Dr. Coelho is in the private practice of orthodontics at Rua Prof. Luis Pinho Rodrigues No. 20, Sala 204, 65075-740 Sao Luis, Maranhao, Brazil. Appliance Fabrication 1. Spot-weld two perpendicular sections of.040" stainless steel tubing to hold them in place until soldering (Fig. 1). This process can be repeated several times along the longer tube, as long as there is at least 37mm between shorter tubes. 2. Solder each spot-welded intersection of the longer and shorter tubes (Fig. 2). 3. Cut off the excess of each shorter tube flush with the longer section (Fig. 3). Cut the longer section flush with the short tube. The excess tubing can be reused. Several sets of T tubes and mandibular rods can be prefabricated at one time and saved for later use. 4. Fabricate the upper molar locking pin by adding a small drop of silver solder to one end of a section of.040" stainless steel wire. Round off the solder drop with a disc and a bur to make it as small and smooth as possible and thus avoid buccal irritation. 5. Insert the molar locking pin into the smaller section of the T tube, and pull it through until the solder drop catches against the tube. Mark the molar locking pin with a pen at the point where it emerges on the other side of the T tube (Fig. 4). 6. Remove the molar locking pin, and bend it gently at the ink mark with a three-prong plier (Fig. 5). Reinsert the molar locking pin all the way into the smaller section of the T tube. If the bend is too acute, deactivate it a bit with the plier. 7. Insert a piece of.040" stainless steel wire into the longer section of T tube to prevent deformation of the tube, then bend the mandibular locking pin with finger pressure until it is parallel to the longer tube (Fig. 6). If necessary, use a heavy plier to complete the bend (Fig. 7). 8. Cut the molar locking pin to a manageable length, and anneal its tip to make it easy to bend during installation (Fig. 8). Fig. 7 Bend finished with heavy plier so molar locking pin is parallel to longer portion of T tube. Fig. 6 Piece of.040" stainless steel wire inserted into longer tube to prevent deformation while bending molar locking pin with finger pressure. Fig. 8 Molar locking tube cut and annealed to make it easy to bend during installation. VOLUME XXXV NUMBER 1 19

Fig. 9 Mandibular rod inserted into T tube. Fig. 10 Circular loops placed in mandibular archwire occlusal to archwire and distal to cuspids. 9. Fabricate the mandibular rod by making a 90 bend at one end of a section of.036" stainless steel wire, forming a longer and a shorter leg. Add a small drop of solder to the tip of the shorter leg. 10. Insert the mandibular rod into the T tube (Fig. 9). Installation 1. The.019".025" stainless steel mandibular archwire must have two small circular loops extending occlusally just distal to the cuspids (Fig. 10). 2. Insert each mandibular rod into a circular loop from the lingual, pull it through, and turn it upward (Fig. 11). 3. Insert each molar locking pin into a maxillary.045" first molar tube from the distal. Ask the patient to posture the mandible forward to simulate the desired overjet and midline, then mark the intersection of each T tube with the corresponding circular loop of the mandibular archwire (Fig. 12). This defines the length of the MPA IV so that it will keep the mandible in the protracted position at rest. Also mark each molar locking pin at the point where it emerges from the mesial end of the first molar tube. 4. Remove each maxillary assembly from the molar tube, and cut the molar locking pins and T tubes at the marks. 5. On each side, while holding the T tube with a plier, insert the mandibular rod into the tube (Fig. 13). Grasp the molar locking pin with a plier, and insert it into the maxillary.045" molar tube from the distal (Fig. 14). Complete the insertion by pushing the assembly forward with a finger. 6. With the patient at maximum opening, use a How plier to firmly bend each molar locking pin Fig. 11 Mandibular rod inserted into circular loop from lingual and turned upward. 20 JCO/JANUARY 2001

Coelho Fig. 12 Molar locking pin inserted into maxillary first molar tube; intersection of T tube and circular loop marked, and molar locking pin marked where it emerges from mesial end of molar tube. Fig. 15 Molar locking pin bent mesial to first molar tube. Fig. 13 Mandibular rod inserted into T tube in mouth. Fig. 16 Molar locking pin tied to maxillary archwire. Fig. 14 Molar locking pin inserted into maxillary first molar tube from distal. mesial to the first molar tube (Fig. 15). If the molar tube is on the occlusal side, bend the pin upward; if the tube is gingival, bend the pin downward. In any event, the tube must cross the.018".025" rectangular maxillary archwire so that it can be tied to the archwire at the molar tube for stabilization (Fig. 16). When the MPA IV is inserted from the distal of the maxillary first molar tube, as shown above, the T tube is long enough that it will almost never disengage from the mandibular rod. In some cases, however, the clinician may prefer to insert the MPA from the mesial. To check whether this can be done without disengagement of the upper and lower parts, insert the molar VOLUME XXXV NUMBER 1 21

Fig. 17 MPA IV activated by winding section of nickel titanium coil spring over mandibular rod. Fig. 18 12-year-old female with Class II, division 1 malocclusion before treatment. 22 JCO/JANUARY 2001

Coelho Fig. 19 MPA IV in place. TABLE 1 CEPHALOMETRIC DATA Before Treatment After Treatment Wits +3mm +0.5mm S-N 73.5mm 77mm Go-Me 72.5mm 80.5mm S-Ar 32mm 34mm Ar-Go 39mm 42mm 1-NPg 5mm 5.5mm SNA 85 89.5 SNB 80 83.5 ANB 5 6 1-SN 115 104 SN-GN 61.5 61 S 126 122 Ar 134 140 Go 123 130 locking pin into the mesial end of the first molar tube. With the patient in an incisor edge-to-edge position, measure the distance from the mesial of the molar tube to the circular loop on the mandibular archwire. Then measure the same distance with the patient at maximum opening. If the second measurement is equal to or greater than twice the first measurement minus 2-3mm, there is no possibility of the mandibular rod disengaging from the T tube at maximum opening. When inserting the MPA IV from the mesial, assuming the maxillary second molars are banded, the emerging end of the molar locking pin must be bent distal to the first molar tube and tied to the rectangular maxillary archwire. The MPA IV can be activated on either or both sides simply by winding a section of nickel titanium coil spring over the mandibular rod. The amount of activation will be determined by the number of turns in the coil (Fig. 17). Case Report A 12-year-old female presented with a Class II, division 1 malocclusion (Fig. 18). She was treated without extractions using the MPA IV (Fig. 19). A satisfactory result was achieved in 18 months (Fig. 20, Table 1). Conclusion The Mandibular Protraction Appliance has proven to be effective during approximately 10 years of clinical use. This fourth version seems to be as efficient as its antecedents, but is much more practical to construct, easy to manipulate, and comfortable for the patient. REFERENCES 1. Pancherz, H.: The effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with the Herbst appliance, Semin. Orthod. 3:232-243, 1997. 2. Pancherz, H.; Ruf, S.; and Kohlhas, P.: Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: A cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study, Am. J. Orthod. 114:437-446, 1998. 3. Jasper, J.J. and McNamara, J.A. Jr.: The correction of interarch malocclusions using a fixed force module, Am. J. Orthod. 108:641-650, 1995. 4. Erdogan, E. and Erdogan, E.: Asymmetric application of the VOLUME XXXV NUMBER 1 23

A B Fig. 20 A. Patient after 18 months of treatment. B. Superimposition of cephalometric tracings before and after treatment. Jasper Jumper in the correction of midline discrepancies, J. Clin. Orthod. 32:170-180, 1998. 5. Stucki, N. and Ingervall, B.: The use of the Jasper Jumper for the correction of Class II malocclusion in the young permanent dentition, Eur. J. Orthod. 20:271-281, 1998. 6. DeVincenzo, J.: The Eureka Spring: A new interarch force delivery system, J. Clin. Orthod. 31:454-467, 1997. 7. Klapper, L.: The SUPERspring II: A new appliance for noncompliant Class II patients, J. Clin. Orthod. 33:50-54, 1999. 8. Calvez, X.: The universal bite jumper, J. Clin. Orthod. 32:493 500, 1998. 9. Allen-Noble, P.S.: Clinical management of the MARA, Orthod. Cyber J., http://www.oc-j.com/2-99/mara1.htm. 10. Castañon, R.; Valdes, M.S.; and White, L.W.: Clinical use of the Churro Jumper, J. Clin. Orthod. 32:731-745, 1998. 11. Coelho Filho, C.M.: Mandibular Protraction Appliances for Class II treatment, J. Clin. Orthod. 29:319-336, 1995. 12. Coelho Filho, C.M.: Clinical applications of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance, J. Clin. Orthod. 31:92-102, 1997. 13. Coelho Filho, C.M.: The Mandibular Protraction Appliance No. 3, J. Clin. Orthod. 32:379-384, 1998. 14. Coelho Filho, C.M.: Emprego clínico do aparelho para projeção da mandíbula, Revista Dental Press de Ortodontia e Ortopedia Facial 3:69-130, 1998. 24 JCO/JANUARY 2001