Se le ctive C e rvica l Spina l M otionr e strictionpa tie ntse le ctionproce dure 1(B L S a nd A L S)

Similar documents
Selective Spine Assessment & Spinal Motion Restriction

Spinal, or Suspected Spinal Injury

The Prehospital Validation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by Paramedics

MEDICAL CONTROL POLICY STATEMENT/ADVISORY. Re: Spinal Injury Assessment & Spinal Precautions Procedure

Introduction. Objectives C-Spine: Where Are We Now? NAEMSP Medical Director Course 1/9/2013

Indications for cervical spine immobilisation: -

Focused History and Physical Examination of the

XXX Spinal Motion Restriction

Shenandoah Co. Fire & Rescue. Injuries to. and Spine. December EMS Training Bill Streett Training Section Chief

Chapter 32. Injuries to the Spine by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

Pre-hospital Spinal Motion Restriction Standard update. Presented by: Dr. Tatiana Jevremovic CCFP (EM)(SEM), Dip.

Overview. Overview. Chapter 30. Injuries to the Head and Spine 9/11/2012. Review of the Nervous and Skeletal Systems. Devices for Immobilization

EMS Spinal Assessment and Precautions

Chapter 32. Objectives. Objectives 01/09/2013. Spinal Column and Spinal Cord Trauma

10O SPLINTING OF INJURIES ADULT & PEDIATRIC. 10Oa: Axial/Spine with Selective Spinal Motion Restriction Adult & Pediatric:

INTERNATIONAL TRAUMA LIFE SUPPORT

To protect patients exhibiting signs and symptoms of spinal injuries and those who have the potential for spinal injuries.

Injuries to the Head and Spine

SPINAL IMMOBILIZATION

3/14/2014 USED TO BE SIMPLE.. TO IMMOBILIZE OR NOT TO IMMOBILIZE.THAT IS THE QUESTION THE PROBLEM OLD THINKING

Heidi Lako-Adamson, MD, NRP, FAEMS FM Ambulance and Sanford EMS Education Medical Director

Introduction to Emergency Medical Care 1

The Assessment & Management of Spine & Spinal Cord Injuries in the Field:

Assessment of the Trauma Patient

3/10/17 Spinal a Injury 1

Objective 1 Review Research on spine injuries and evaluation standards.

Northwest Community EMS System Continuing Education Class Credit Questions for October 2014 Spine Motion Restriction (Didactic)

Trauma Overview. Chapter 22

To Backboard or Not To Backboard, That is the Question? Selective Spinal Immobilization

Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine

Clinical Radiology: A Pragmatic Perspective. Agenda. Clinical Practice The Art of Hypothesis S APTA CSM /17/12. APTA CSM 2013, San Diego 1

Every day thousands of people become the accidental victims of trauma.

Selective Spinal Immobilization

EMS Update Spinal Motion Restriction Training

Patient Assessment. Chapter 8

Kinetic Energy Energy in Motion KE = Mass (weight) X Velocity (speed)² 2 Double Weight = Energy Double Speed = Energy IS THE GREATEST DETERMINANT

NEW SPINAL PRECAUTION STANDARDS

By: Kurt Bloomstrand, MD. EMS Medical Director

Controversies in Spinal Immobilization

GOALS: To be able to assure proper patient selection in spinal motion restriction

Evaluation and Stabilization of the Athlete with Possible Spine Injury

4/19/2017. Prehospital Spinal Care: Then. Prehospital Spinal Care: Then. Prehospital Spinal Care: Then. Prehospital Spinal Care: Then. Why Immobilize?

STOP THE MADDNESS! 4/19/2012. Mechanism of Injury A historical review of bad advice and dangerous dogma

Cervical Spine Injury Guidelines

Restore adequate respiratory and circulatory conditions. Reduce pain

SCIWORA Rozlyn McTeer BSN, RN, CEN Pediatric Trauma Coordinator Trauma Services OBJECTIVES DEFINITION 11/8/2017. Identify SCIWORA.

The Dynamics of Trauma. Jamie Syrett, MD Director of Prehospital Care Rochester General Health System

NOR-CAL EMS MEDICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE RUN REVIEW, NOVEMBER 2014

Spinal injury. Structure of the spine

Comparing the Canadian Cervical Spine Rule and Radiology Confirmed Cervical Spine Injury in the Emergency Department

Deceleration during 'real life' motor vehicle collisions: A sensitive predictor for the risk of sustaining a cervical spine injury?

Cervical Spine Precautions A quick review. By Joseph Lewis, M.D. Medical Director, Honolulu EMS Board Certified in Emergency Medicine

Position Statement for the Management of Patients with Potential Spinal Injuries

Identify the risk management issues involved in caring for patient with orthopedic complaints.

Trauma Patients What do we really know?

Chapter 26 Head and Spine Trauma The Nervous System The nervous system controls virtually all of our body activities including reflex, voluntary and

CLINICAL MANUAL. Trauma System Activation Trauma Code Criteria

Steve Blados M.Ed., NRP Linda Gibbens, M.S., ATC, LAT

MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Subject:

Episode 66 Backboard and Collar Nightmares from EMU Conference. The Risks Associated with Backboard & Collar

PRE-HOSPITAL PATIENT CARE PROTOCOLS BASIC LIFE SUPPORT/ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT

Pre-hospital Trauma Life Support. Rattiya Banjungam Emergency Physician, Khon Kaen Hospital

Imaging Decision Making: Acute Cervical Spine Injury (in the Alert and Stable Adult Following Blunt Trauma)

Vacuum Immobilisation Mattress (VIM) Research Studies

To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Selective Spinal Immobilization

Position Statement from the National Ski Patrol Medical Advisory Committee on the Selective Use of Backboards for Possible Spinal Injuries

Immobilizing the spine New national approach

Chapter 12. Objectives. Objectives 01/09/2013. Scene Size-Up

Lifting and Moving Patients

North West London Trauma Network Spinal Pathway and Protocols

Selected Topics: Prehospital Care

: NEURO TRAUMA

Time Equals Neurons - Spinal Cord Injury Management in the first 4 Hours

SPINE EVALUATION AND CLEARANCE Basic Principles

Chapter 8 Trauma Patient Assessment The Patient Assessment Process The Primary Assessment ABCDE s Airway, Breathing, Circulation while securing

CERVICAL STRAIN AND SPRAIN

What s New from the Eagles? Who the heck are the Eagles?

CERVICAL STRAIN AND SPRAIN (Whiplash)

DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT

Injuries to the Head and Spine From Bradys Emergency Care 10 th Edition

Professional Development & Training MM3. Firefighter Prehospital Care Program. Maintenance Module 3 Course Mill Version

A guide to writing clear, concise EMS reports using SIREN

Follow your protocols!

MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES Basic EMT Practical Examination Cardiac Arrest Management

Chapter 24 Spinal Trauma Introduction to Spinal Injuries (1 of 2) Annually 15,000 permanent spinal cord injuries Commonly men years old

9/15/2015. Introduction (1 of 3) Chapter 8. Introduction (2 of 3) What is the difference? Scene Size-up (1 of 2) Patient Assessment

TALK TRAUMA Clearing the C-Spine. David Ouellette

The Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire*

Spinal injury: assessment and initial management

Pediatric Trauma Cases

Review. 1. Kinetic energy is a calculation of:

EMS 202: Emergency Medical Technician Course Schedule

RADICULOPATHY AN INTRODUCTION TO

Cases from the Streets. Kelly Buchanan MD, ATC/L EMS Fellow December, 2011

BLS 2015 Neurological Emergencies Scenario #1

McHenry Western Lake County EMS System Paramedic, EMT-B and PHRN Optional Continuing Education 2019 #2 Blunt Trauma

OCS Exam Webinar Review #1. Ground Rules

Chapter 5. Learning Objectives. Learning Objectives 9/18/2012. Lifting and Moving Patients. Define body mechanics

EMS 202: Emergency Medical Technician Course Schedule

Transcription:

Section: EMS Page: 1 of 5 I. PURPOSE Mechanism of injury alone has not been shown to be a predictor for spinal injury. An appropriate patient assessment can be used to determine need for spinal motion restriction. II. PROCEDURE: Below are two cervical spinal motion restriction selection guidelines. Either may be applied to stable patients between the ages of 18 years and 65 years of age that are clinically sober and do not have altered mental status. Patients who suffer injuries in which cervical spinal injuries are possible and do not meet the below criteria, should have precautions to minimize movement of the spine. Se le ctive C e rvica l Spina l M otionr e strictionpa tie ntse le ctionproce dure 1(B L S a nd A L S) Cervical spinal motion restriction devices do not need to be applied to: 1. Patients suffering from penetrating trauma with no neurological deficits. Immobilization of penetrating trauma patients may lead to increased mortality, and/or 2. Seat belted patients of collisions (<60 mph) where the airbag has not been deployed and the vehicle s glass is intact.

Section: EMS Page: 2 of 5 Se le ctive C e rvica l Spina l M otionr e strictionpa tie ntse le ctionproce dure 2(B L S a nd A L S) A ny one ofthe se high risk fa ctors re quire s ce rvica l spina l m otionre striction 65 years of age or greater (or less than 18 years) Dangerous mechanism* Numbness or tingling in extremity A ny one ofthe following low risk fa ctors which a llow sa fe a sse ssm e ntofra nge ofm otionofthe ne ck Simple rear end MVC ** OR N O YES N O *D a nge rous M e cha nism Fall from elevation (greater than or equal to 3 feet Axial load to head (diving) MVC high speed (>60miles/hr) Rollover Ejection Motorized recreational vehicle (ATV, motorcycle) Bicycle collision A pply ce rvica l spina l m otionre strictionde vice Ambulatory at any time at scene OR U na ble YES Patient voluntarily able to ACTIVELY ROTATE neck 45 degrees left and right when requested, regardless of pain A B L E C onside rn O ce rvica l spina l m otionre striction **Sim ple re a re nds e xclude s Pushed into oncoming traffic Hit by bus/large truck Rollover Hit by high speed vehicle (>60miles/hr)

Section: EMS Page: 3 of 5 Thora cic a nd L um ba r Spina l m otionre striction(a ll a ge s) Based on the patient assessment, some patients will require cervical spinal motion restriction and/or motion restriction of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Traditionally cervical collars have been used to minimize motion of the cervical spine and the long back board has been used to limit motion of the thoracic and lumbar spine. There is limited data studying spinal motion in patients with applied cervical collars. Patient exiting out of car under their own power, with cervical collar in place, may result in the least amount of motion of the cervical spine. 1 Cervical spinal motion restriction devices include, but are not limited to soft and hard collars. Long back boards have not been shown to reduce spinal injury complications. In fact, they are associated with increased pain, decubitus development, and possibly decreased functional residual capacity of the lungs. L ong ba ck boa rds a nd scoop stre tche rs a re pa tie nttra nsfe r de vice s a nd not de vice s for pa tie nttra nsport. If utilized, patients (all ages) should be removed off the long backboard and scoop stretchers as soon as possible. 1 West J Emerg Med. 2009 May; 10(2): 74 78. C e rvica l Spine M otiond uring Extrica tion:a PilotStudy Jeffery S. Shafer, MD, EMTP and Rosanne S. Naunheim, MD

Section: EMS Page: 4 of 5 Thora cic a nd L um ba rspina l M otionr e strictionproce dure (B L S a nd A L S) 1. Perform general patient management 2. Apply the cervical spinal motion restriction selection procedure if appropriate -If cervical motion restriction is not required, patient may ambulate or be moved to stretcher using long backboard, scoop stretcher or other device appropriate for the patient s condition. -If cervical motion restriction is indicated, follow the steps below. A B EN I P 3. Provide manual in-line stabilization of the head and neck. 4. Apply an appropriately sized cervical spinal motion restriction device (soft or hard collar). 5. Assess sensory and motor function in all four extremities. 6. Based on the patient s priority and ability to self extricate or ambulate, safely transfer patient to stretcher a. Ambulatory with no back pain. A pply ce rvica l spina l m otionre strictionde vice a nd a m bula te to stre tche r*. Encourage patient to limit motion while on stretcher and collar. b. Ambulatory with back pain. A pply ce rvica l spina l m otionre strictionde vice a nd a m bula te to stre tche r*. Place patient on back board only if needed to facilitate patient transfer. Remove patient off backboard for transport. Encourage patient to limit motion. c. Non-ambulatory. A pply ce rvica l spina l m otionre strictionde vice a nd pla ce pa tie ntonba ck boa rd. Transfer patient to stretcher. Remove patient off backboard for transport. Encourage patient to limit motion. d. Unstable. Apply cervical spinal motion restriction device and place patient on backboard. Transfer patient to stretcher. If the resources and time available, remove patient off of backboard. If not, maintain patient on backboard. Encourage patient to limit motion. 7. If needed use head blocks, towels, and/or straps after positioning to limit cervical spine motion. 8. Reassess sensory and motor function in all four extremities. Transport as soon as possible and perform ongoing assessments

Section: EMS Page: 5 of 5 L ong ba ck boa rds a nd scoop stre tche rs ca nbe utiliz e d tofa cilita te the transfe rofpa tie ntona nd offthe stre tche r. L ong ba ck boa rds ha ve notbe e nshowntopre ve ntspina l injury onpa tie nts. The re a re a dve rse e ffe cts a ssocia te d withthe use oflong ba ck boa rds. R e m ove pa tie nts offofthe long ba ck boa rd a nd scoop stre tche rs a s soona s possible. *H a ve the pa tie ntm ove slowly. Ifpa tie ntde ve lops significa ntpa in,the y should notcontinue tom ove a nd pote ntia lly a ggra va te the injury. U se ba ck boa rd tofa cilita te the pa tie nttra nsfe rtostre tche r. Ke y Points:SPIN A L M O TIO N R ESTR IC TIO N PA TIEN T SEL EC TIO N W he nindoubt,a pply ce rvica l spina l m otionre strictionde vice EM S provide rs a re e xpe cte d touse good judgm e nta nd m a y e le cttoa pply ce rvica l spina l m otionre strictionde vice toa ny pa tie nt. M e cha nism ofinjury a lone ha s notbe e nshowntobe a pre dictor forspina l injury. A ll pa tie nts with a da nge rous m e cha nism ofinjury,a M S,spine te nde rne ss, distra cting injurie s,ora nunre lia ble physica l e xa m should be tre a te d insuch a m a nne r a s tolim itspina l m otion.