Cancer Drugs Fund. Managed Access Agreement. Nivolumab for previously treated nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer

Similar documents
Cancer Drugs Fund. Managed Access Agreement. Atezolizumab for untreated metastatic urothelial cancer where cisplatin is unsuitable

Managed Access Agreement. Osimertinib for treating metastatic EGFR and T790M mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

1 st Appraisal Committee meeting Background & Clinical Effectiveness Gillian Ells & Malcolm Oswald 24/11/2016

Lead team presentation:

Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Nivolumab for adjuvant treatment of resected stage III and IV melanoma

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 1 November 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta483

Background Comparative effectiveness of nivolumab

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE GUIDANCE EXECUTIVE (GE)

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 18 July 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta531

NSCLC: immunotherapy as a first-line treatment. Paolo Bironzo Oncologia Polmonare AOU S. Luigi Gonzaga Orbassano (To)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 6 December 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta492

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 16 May 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta520

Nivolumab (Opdivo) with ipilimumab (Yervoy) for recurrent, metastatic, squamous cell head and neck cancer first line

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 26 October 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta416

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 11 January 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta428

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 28 September 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta411

LONDON CANCER NEW DRUGS GROUP RAPID REVIEW. Erlotinib for the third or fourth-line treatment of NSCLC January 2012

Erlotinib (Tarceva) for non small cell lung cancer advanced or metastatic maintenance monotherapy

Single Technology Appraisal (STA)

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Health Technology Appraisal

NECN CHEMOTHERAPY HANDBOOK PROTOCOL

EVIDENCE IN BRIEF OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

EVIDENCE IN BRIEF OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

Metastatic NSCLC: Expanding Role of Immunotherapy. Evan W. Alley, MD, PhD Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Presbyterian

PTAC meeting held on 5 & 6 May (minutes for web publishing)

Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab with ipilimumab (Opdivo with Yervoy ) for the treatment of advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma.

Pemetrexed for the maintenance treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Erlotinib for the first-line treatment of EGFR-TK mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer

Atezolizumab Non-small cell lung cancer

Background 1. Comparative effectiveness of nintedanib

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Dabrafenib for treating unresectable, advanced or metastatic

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 22 June 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta395

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 29 June 2011 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta227

The pcodr review also provided contextual information on ALK mutation testing.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Lung Cancer William N. William Jr.

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 28 September 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta406

Incorporating Immunotherapy into the treatment of NSCLC

Nivolumab: esperienze italiane nel carcinoma polmonare avanzato

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 24 August 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta402

Immune Therapy in Clear Cell Ovarian Cancer (ITICC) Hal Hirte Canadian Cancer Clinical Trials Group

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE. Health Technology Appraisal

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 23 July 2014 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta319

Putting NICE guidance into practice

Conversations in Oncology. November Kerry Hotel Pudong, Shanghai China

CheckMate 012: Safety and Efficacy of First Line Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 30 August 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta472

Immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

CheckMate 025, as patients may derive a benefit, based on the opinion of the CGP and the mechanism of action of nivolumab.

EVIDENCE IN BRIEF OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 21 December 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta422

NCCN Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer V Meeting June 15, 2018

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 7 March 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta509

European Commission Approves Expanded Use of Opdivo (nivolumab) to Include Previously Treated Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 8 November 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta487

Bristol-Myers Squibb s Opdivo

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Ipilimumab (MDX-010) for unresectable stage III or IV metastatic melanoma - first or second line treatment

Recent Advances in Lung Cancer: Updates from ASCO Updates from ESMO, AACR and ASCO


First Phase 3 Results Presented for a PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Bevacizumab (Avastin) in combination with non-taxanes for metastatic breast cancer - first line therapy

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 24 January 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta500

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 24 August 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta405

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 6 September 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta476


Lead team presentation Nivolumab for relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (STA)

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE. Proposed Health Technology Appraisal

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 20 December 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta496

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)

Bevacizumab added to a taxane for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 31 January 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta502

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE GUIDANCE EXECUTIVE (GE)

Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Cemiplimab for treating cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Title: Lung cancer (non-small-cell, anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive, previously treated) ceritinib

Immuno-Oncology Applications

Clinical Commissioning Policy: Chemotherapy Algorithms for Adults and Children. January 2013 Reference: NHS England XXX/X/X.

Bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent advanced ovarian cancer

Reflex Testing Guidelines for Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Supplementary Online Content

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Clinical Guidance Report Nivolumab (Opdivo) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer June 3, 2016

Cowen Health Care Conference

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 7 February 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta505

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 31 August 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta473

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Initial Clinical Guidance Report Nivolumab (Opdivo) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer April 1, 2016

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 19 July 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta458


Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers. Barbara Burtness, MD Yale University

Part 1 Public handouts

Wells Fargo Healthcare Conference September 6, 2018

Lead team presentation Eribulin for treating locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer after two or more prior chemotherapy regimens STA

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 11 April 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta517

Horizon Scanning Technology Briefing. Cetuximab (Erbitux) for metastatic colorectal cancer. National Horizon Scanning Centre.

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 9 August 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta465

CDF Rapid Reconsideration

EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC

PEMBROLIZUMAB (KEYTRUDA ) for the treatment of advanced melanoma or previously treated NSCLC

Disclosures. Immunotherapyin Head & NeckCancer. Actual landscape of systemic treatment in HNSCC. Head andneckcanceris an immunogeneic tumor

PART VI: SUMMARY OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN BY PRODUCT

pcodr EXPERT REVIEW COMMITTEE (perc) INITIAL RECOMMENDATION

Squamous Cell Carcinoma Standard and Novel Targets.

Transcription:

Cancer Drugs Fund Managed Access Agreement Nivolumab for previously treated nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Cancer Drugs Fund Data Collection Arrangement Nivolumab for previously treated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer [ID900] Company name: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Primary source of data collection: Ongoing clinical study Secondary source of data collection: Systemic anti-cancer therapy data set NICE Agreement Manager Linda Landells, Associate Director Technology Appraisals (Cancer Drugs Fund) NHS England Agreement Manager Public Health England Agreement Manager BMS Agreement Manager Peter Clark, Cancer Drugs Fund Clinical Lead Martine Bomb, Head of Data Projects, National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service Benjamin Hickey, UK General Manager 1 Purpose of data collection arrangement 1.1 The purpose of the agreement is to describe the arrangements and responsibilities for further data collection of nivolumab for lung cancer (nonsmall-cell, non-squamous, metastatic) after chemotherapy [ID900] (to be updated with TA number after final guidance has been published). A positive recommendation within the context of a managed access agreement has been decided by the appraisal committee. 2 Commencement and period of agreement 2.1 This data collection arrangement shall take effect on publication of the managed access agreement. The data collection is anticipated to conclude June 2019, when it is expected that 5-year follow-up data will be available from the CheckMate 057 clinical trial. 2.2 As part of the managed access agreement, the technology will continue to be available through the Cancer Drugs Fund after the data collection period Issue date: September 2017 1 of 6

has ended and while the guidance is being reviewed. This assumes that the data collection period ends as planned and the review of guidance follows the standard timelines described in the addendum to NICE s methods and processes when appraising cancer technologies. 3 Patient eligibility 3.1 Nivolumab is recommended for use within the Cancer Drugs Fund as an option for treating locally advanced or metastatic PD-L1-positive nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer in adults after chemotherapy. Key patient eligibility criteria for nivolumab s use in the cancer drugs fund include: Patient has a confirmed diagnosis of stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (non-squamous) Patient has progressed after previously receiving at least 2 cycles of platinum-containing chemotherapy for stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer and also a targeted treatment if the tumour is EGFR positive or ALK positive Patient has a performance status of 0 or 1 Patient has not received prior treatment with an anti-pd-1, anti-pd-l1, anti-pd-l2, anti-cd137, or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) antibody unless received as part of the nivolumab EAMS programme for this indication and meeting all other criteria listed. Patient has had PD-L1 testing with an approved and validated test to determine the Tumour Proportion Score Patients tumour expresses PD-L1, that is with a tumour proportion score 1% Nivolumab will be administered as monotherapy Patient has no symptomatically active brain metastases or leptomeningeal metastases. Nivolumab will be stopped at 2 years of treatment or on disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurs first. Issue date: September 2017 2 of 6

3.2 It is estimated that 344 patients will receive nivolumab for previously treated through the Cancer Drugs Fund during the managed access arrangement. 3.3 It is estimated that the average treatment duration for a patient with nonsquamous NSCLC will be 5.8 months. 4 Area(s) of clinical uncertainty 4.1 Based on the evidence provided during the appraisals, the NICE committee noted that nivolumab has a different level of clinical effectiveness according to PD-L1 expression. While the use of nivolumab within the CDF is available only to those with a PD-L1 expression of at least 1%, different PD-L1 expression level will therefore be explored as part of the data collection arrangement. The primary data source will be CheckMate -057 as the protocol for this trial included collecting this data along with other biomarkers at baseline. PD-L1 expression subgroup analyses using the 5-year follow-up data will be undertaken, including cost-effectiveness analysis, and provided to NICE when the guidance is reviewed. These analyses are described in Section 7. 4.2 The long-term overall survival and duration of therapy are the two other key areas of uncertainty identified by the NICE committee. The primary source of data to address these will be the ongoing trial described in section 5. Issue date: September 2017 3 of 6

5 Source(s) of data collection Clinical trials 5.1 Data collection from the ongoing clinical trial (CheckMate 057) will be the primary source of data collection. A 5-year data cut from the trial is expected in June 2019. A 7-year data cut from CheckMate 003 will also be available in June 2019 as a supportive source of data. Table 1 provides a brief description of the trial details. Table 1 Trial description CheckMate 057 Phase III (n=574) Description: Nivolumab vs docetaxel for the treatment of patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Primary Endpoint: OS Secondary Endpoint: ORR, PFS, PDL1 as a predictive biomarker for OS, ORR, PROs CheckMate 003 Phase IIb (n=129) Description: Dose escalation study of nivolumab in subjects with selected advanced or recurrent malignancies. Cohort of patients with squamous and non-squamous NSCLC previously treated received at least one prior systemic therapy, including a platinum-based or taxane-based chemotherapy Primary Endpoint: safety and tolerability, Secondary Endpoint: ORR, exploratory OS, exploratory PD-L1 expression ORR: Overall Response Rate, OS: Overall Survival, PFS: Progression Free Survival, PROs: Patient Reported Outcomes SACT 5.2 The Systemic Anti-cancer Therapy (SACT) dataset is a mandated dataset as part of the Health and Social Care Information Standards. 5.3 A test for PD-L1 status will be conducted for every patient commencing treatment. Each patient s PD-L1 status will be captured via NHS England s Blueteq system as part of pre-authorisation for treatment. Blueteq will also capture patients who cannot be tested or those whose tests are inconclusive. Issue date: September 2017 4 of 6

6 Outcome data Clinical trials 6.1 The two most pertinent outcomes to be measured are long-term overall survival and duration of treatment. At the end of the data collection period 5- year data will be available from the ongoing CheckMate 057 trial. Sub-group analysis by PD-L1 expression level will be provided by 1%, 5% and 10% expression levels and submitted to NICE when the guidance is reviewed. This will be supplemented by the data collected in SACT. 6.2 Long-term comparator data is not being collected because all patients crossed-over to nivolumab in CheckMate 057 at 2 years. SACT 6.3 Data collection via SACT will support data collected in the clinical trials. During the managed access agreement period, SACT will collect data on overall survival, duration of therapy and PD-L1 expression (obtained via Blueteq). 7 Data analysis plan Clinical trials 7.1 At the end of the data collection period 5-year overall survival data from the CheckMate 057 will be used to inform the long-term extrapolation in the costeffectiveness model along with the 7-year overall survival data from CheckMate 003. 7.2 Sub-group analysis by PD-L1 expression level will also be undertaken by 1%, 5% and 10% expression levels. The sub-group analyses and associated cost-effectiveness estimates will be provided to NICE as part of the evidence submission when the guidance is reviewed. 7.3 Any revisions in the timing of the 5-year data will be communicated with NICE. As discussed, quarterly meetings will be set in order to track the progress of the data collection by Public Health England. Issue date: September 2017 5 of 6

SACT 7.4 Public Health England will provide a report for NHS England based on data collected via SACT during the data collection period. The report will present de-personalised summary data based on the outcomes identified in section 6.2. The report will be shared with BMS prior to the review of the appraisal. 8 Ownership of the data 8.1 For all clinical trial data listed above, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company will be the owner. 8.2 SACT data is owned by individual patients, Public Health England is the data controller and will conduct analysis of SACT data. BMS will not have access to the SACT patient-level data. Public Health England will produce a report for NHS England at the end of the managed access period. The report will be shared with BMS. 8.3 Blueteq s CDF system data is owned by NHS England. 9 Publication 9.1 The details/authorship of any proposed publications arising from these studies will be planned with the publication of the final study results. 9.2 Publication of the analysis results of SACT data collected alongside the primary data source will be planned by Public Health England. BMS will be given access to the report produced for NHS England for the review of the appraisal prior to the planned start of the review. 9.3 Publication of the analysis results of Blueteq s CDF system data collected alongside the primary data source will be planned by NHS England. BMS will be given access to any report produced for the review of the appraisal and the review of the appraisal prior to the planned start of the review. Issue date: September 2017 6 of 6

Commercial Access Agreement Nivolumab for previously treated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer The contents of this document have been redacted as they are confidential

Single technology appraisal (STA) Nivolumab for previously treated Cancer Drugs Fund - Glossary of terms Term Commercial access agreement Patient access scheme Managed access agreement Explanation The standard way for pharmaceutical companies to make cancer drugs cost effective for the NHS either when they are recommended by NICE for entry into the Cancer Drugs Fund or if they were a transition drug in July 2016 and undergoing appraisal by NICE as a transition drug for exiting from the Cancer Drugs Fund. Each agreement is approved by NHS England. The standard way for pharmaceutical companies to make cancer drugs cost effective for the NHS when they are routinely commissioned. Each scheme is approved by the Department of Health. Patient access schemes are part of the Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (2014) A Cancer Drugs Fund managed access agreement consists of two components: The first is a data collection arrangement, which sets out data that will be collected during the managed access period to resolve clinical uncertainty The second is a commercial access agreement that determines how much the NHS will pay for the treatment during the managed access period. This is normally a commercial access agreement that is managed by NHS England. However, if appropriate, a Department of Health-approved patient access scheme can also be used. Cancer Drugs Fund Glossary of terms 1 of 1