Development of safe levels of elemental impurities

Similar documents
INTERNATIONAL CONCIL FOR HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE ICH HARMONISED GUIDELINE Q3D(R1)

Ethylene Oxide

PQRI PODP Extractables & Leachables Workshop Derivation of the Parenteral Safety Concern Threshold (SCT)

CHARACTERIZING THE IMPACTS OF UNCERTAINTY AND SCIENTIFIC JUDGMENT IN EXPOSURE LIMIT DEVELOPMENT

APPLICATION FOR AUTHORISATION: ESTABLISHING A REFERENCE DOSE RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP FOR CARCINOGENICITY OF INORGANIC ARSENIC COMPOUNDS

Robert G. Sussman, Ph.D., DABT Managing Principal, Eastern Operations. SafeBridge Consultants, Inc. Mountain View, CA New York, NY Liverpool, UK

PQRI PODP Extractables & Leachables Workshop Leachable Evaluation of a Container Closure System - What to do When Above the Threshold

APPENDIX K - Exposure Limits For Uranium

HEALTH CONSULTATION. Tom Lea Park EL PASO COUNTY METAL SURVEY EL PASO, EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS EPA FACILITY ID: TX

ICH guideline Q3D (R1) on elemental impurities

Methodologies for development of human health criteria and values for the lake Erie drainage basin.

Toxicological tool. Sarah O Meara, PhD, MSc PharmMed Non-clinical Assessor. GMP Conference 12 th November 2014

Presenting Uncertainty in the Context of Toxicological, Biological Monitoring and Exposure Information. William H.

General Chapter/Section: <232> Elemental Impurities - Limits Expert Committee(s): General Chapters Chemical Analysis No.

Development of NJ Human Health-based Criteria and Standards

IMPURITIES: GUIDELINE FOR RESIDUAL SOLVENTS PDE FOR CUMENE

Risk Assessment Report for AGSS-ICS

Zinc: Issues and Update. Craig Boreiko, Ph.D. Ottawa May 2008

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Thought Starter Combined Exposures to Multiple Chemicals Second International Conference on Risk Assessment

The Director General Maisons-Alfort, 30 July 2018 OPINION. of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

232 ELEMENTAL IMPURITIES LIMITS

Cancer thresholds, Cohort of Concern and other excluded substance groups

Safety Data Sheet. SECTION 1: Identification. SECTION 2: Hazard identification

Regulation of Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Impurities in

Outline: risk assessment. What kind of environmental risks do we commonly consider? 11/19/2013. Why do we need chemical risk assessment?

Proactive Integration of Occupational Toxicology Assessments into the Drug Development Process

Subject: Assessing the Potential Risk of Human Exposure to Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene) and Formaldehyde

MANGANESE & HEALTH: A BALANCE OF STORIES

Safety Data Sheet. SECTION 1: Identification. SECTION 2: Hazard identification

Appendix B Toxicity of Mercury

Case Study Summary: Appendix: Evaluation of Hazard Range for Three Additional Chemicals: Tetrachloroethylene, Chromium (VI) and Arsenic.

Health Consultation. Apple Trees Recreational Area (PICA Site 192) PICATINNY ARSENAL ROCKAWAY TOWNSHIP, MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

NAPHTHALENE. Hazard Summary

Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC):

ENV 455 Hazardous Waste Management

3M Critical & Chronic Care Solutions Division

Safety Data Sheet. SECTION 1: Identification. SECTION 2: Hazard identification

Thresholds of Toxicological Concern

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

DEVELOPMENT OF THE CHROMIUM PUBLIC HEALTH GOAL

Threshold Establishment and Rationale. Douglas J Ball, MS, DABT Research Fellow Pfizer Worldwide R&D

The Burden of Foodborne Chemicals

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Threshold of Toxicological Concern Overview of Ongoing Scientific Developments

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

S A F E T Y D A T A S H E E T

Risk Characterization

Ingredient CAS Number Percent ACGIH (TWA) OSHA (PEL) Title Compound mg/m mg/m3. Ingestion, skin, inhalation of dust

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Converting between PDEs and Concentration Limits

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Pizza Pan Case Study

Chemical Name: Metolachlor ESA CAS: Synonyms: Ethanesulfonate degradate of metolachlor; CGA

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

SILICA, CRYSTALLINE (RESPIRABLE DUST)

Safety Data Sheet. SECTION 1: Identification. SECTION 2: Hazard identification

Reference Document for AF Form 2766 on Fuel Systems Repair

GreenScreen Assessment for [Substituted Amine Phosphate Mixture (CAS# )] Method Version: GreenScreen Version 1.2 1

Nutritional and Toxicological Aspects of Manganese Intake. Annette Santamaria, PhD, MPH, DABT ENVIRON International Corporation May 6, 2008

White Paper: FDA Update/Review of Potential Adverse Health Risks Associated with Exposure to Mercury in Dental Amalgam

SAFETY DATA SHEET. Issue Date: 05/25/2015 Version No: 1 1. Identification

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Part 2. Chemical and physical aspects

11/29/2010 FOOD SAFETY CAPACITY BUILDING ON RESIDUE CONTROL

Dose response relationships: biological and modeling aspects

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

SAFETY DATA SHEET SUPERIOR INORGANIC ACID CORE FLUX TYPE 1 DATE REVISED: January 1, 2015

Dose and Response for Chemicals

Low dose effect Alan R Boobis Imperial College London ILSI Europe March 2014 Annual Symposium Brussels, Belgium

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Nonclinical Safety Evaluation of Inhalation Drug Products

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Tetrachloroethylene: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Draft Toxicological Review Kate Z. Guyton, PhD DABT

Water Contamination and Potential Health Risks and Exposure Assessments on Military Bases

Toxicological Intake Values for Priority Contaminants in Soil

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

TLVs for Nanoparticles. Terry Gordon, PhD Chair, TLV Committee

CHEMICAL IDENTITY. INCI NAME: propylene glycol IUPAC: propane-1,2-diol CAS: EC NUMBER: EMPIRICAL FORMULA: C3H8O2 STRUCTURAL FORMULA:

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

SAFETY DATA SHEET SUPERIOR NO. 71 PASTE DATE REVISED: January 1, 2018

Product Identification Numbers LE-F , , , , , ,

CHAPTER 8 RISK CHARACTERIZATION

N-Methylneodecanamide (MNDA)

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Safety Data Sheet. SECTION 1: Identification. SECTION 2: Hazard identification

Skin Corrosive 2, Eye Irritant 2A, Hazardous to aquatic environment

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Safety Data Sheet Avesta Classic Pickling Paste 101

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Guidelines to Develop Inhalation and Oral Cancer and Non-Cancer Toxicity Factors. Chapters 1-6. Draft June 7, 2011 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Transcription:

Development of safe levels of elemental impurities ICH Q3D MASSET Dominique Head of Pharmaceutical Quality Non Clinical and Viral Safety Department Evaluation division 5 april 2016 EMA London

Safe Levels or exposure Limits : Definition A safe Level is a toxicological index that, when compared with exposure, is used to qualify or quantify a risk to human health Safe levels are widely used in quantitative heath risk assessment, a decision-making process designed to provide the scientific evidence essential for proposing corrective measures 1

The Exposure limits : two Approachs Based on an increase of risk per dose Safety value that defines quantitatively the relationship between dose and response (i.e., the slope factor) risk at low exposure levels is difficult to measure directly either by animal experiments or by epidemiologic studies Based on a data set and using the model to extrapolate Based on critical effect for a specific substance in animal or in Human and apply uncertainity factors 2

The Exposure limit : Which one? There are two type of Exposure Limit in ICH guideline ICH guidlines (Q3x) uses Permitted Daily Exposure Method (PDE) ICH M7 uses TTC concept and Stage TTC TTC Concept is based on simple linear extrapolation from the dose giving a 50% tumor incidence (TD50) to a 1 in 10 6 incidence, using TD50 data for the most sensitive species and most sensitive site of tumor induction Many heavy metals are known to accumulate, PDE concept is based on a substance-specific dose that is unlikely to cause an adverse effect if an individual is exposed at or below this dose every day for a lifetime There are extensive databases on most heavy metals and these should be used for risk assessment 3

Calculation of a permitted Daily Exposure PDE : General methods STEP 1 Hazard identification by reviewing all relevant data STEP 2 identification of critical effects, STEP 3 determination of the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of the findings that are considered to be critical effects, STEP 4 use of several adjustment factors to account for various uncertainties (Uncertainity Factors) PDE = NOEL x Weight Adjustment F1 x F2 x F3 x F4 x F5 (50 kg) PDE apply for all population 4

The Exposure limit : Other exposure limits MRL : Minimal Risk Level: An estimate of the daily human exposure to a hazardous substance that is likely to be without appreciable risk. (ATSDR), ATSDR uses the no observed adverse effect level/uncertainty factor (NOAEL/UF) express in (mg/kg/day) Rfd Reference Dose US EPA 5

Occupational exposure limits PEL : Permitted Exposure Limit. TVL : Threshold Limit Value: The concentration in air to which it is believed that most workers can be exposed daily without an adverse effect (ACGIH TWA : Time Weighted Average: As defined by ACGIH, time-weighted average concentration for a conventional 8-hour workday and a 40-hour workweek. (IUPAC) URF : Unit Risk Factor 6

Calculation of a permitted Daily Exposure PDE : ICH Q3D Elements evaluated in this guideline were assessed by reviewing publicly available data contained in scientific journals, government research reports and studies, international regulatory standards (applicable to drug products) and guidance, and regulatory authority research and assessment reports. The factors considered are : The likely oxidation state of the element in the drug product; Human exposure and safety data when it provided applicable information; The most relevant animal study; Route of administration; The relevant endpoint(s) 7

Calculation of a permitted Daily Exposure PDE : ICH Q3D international regulatory standards Where appropriate, these standards were considered in the safety assessment and establishment of the PDEs. The longest duration animal study was generally used to establish the PDE. Inhalation studies using soluble salts (when available) were preferred over studies using particulates for inhalation safety assessment and derivation of inhalation PDEs. The PDEs established in this guideline are considered to be protective of public health for all patient populations 8

Exemple Oral PDE of As Critical effects Inorganic arsenic has shown to be genotoxic, but not mutagenic and has been acknowledged as a human carcinogen most part the effects of arsenic in humans have not been reproduced in animals Oral exposure has been linked to cancers of the skin, liver, lung, kidney and bladder. Following inhalation exposure there is evidence for an increased risk of lung cancer Sources Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) 9

Exemple Oral PDE of As Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) MRL = 0.0003mg/kg/d 15 µg/d = 0.0003 x 50 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 PDE = 0.0003 mg/kg/d x 50 kg = 0.015 mg/d = 15 μg/day 10

Inhalation PDE of As Critical effects Increased risk of lung cancer and other respiratory disorders have been reported following inhalation exposure to workers in the occupational setting The rationale for using a cancer endpoint for inhalation to set the PDE is the relative lack of information on linear-dose extrapolation, as compared to the oral route Source URF (Unit Risk Factor ) = for 0.067 µg/m3 => 1/100.000 Inhalation PDE = 0.067 μg/m3 / 1000 L/m3 x 28800 L/d = 1.9 μg/day No modifying factors were applied PDE is based on a URF derived from the multiplicate relative risk model described by Erraguntla et al. (2012). 11

Oral PDE for Hg Critical effects inorganic mercury is not carcinogenic in human neurological, corrosive, hematopoietic, and renal effects and cutaneous disease (acrodynia). Source The 6-month gavage study in rats was selected because it had more detailed clinical pathology assessment and a wider range of doses, nephropathy was noted from 0.625 mg HgCl2. BMDL10 of 0.06 mg Hg/kg/day 12

Oral PDE for Hg (cont.) 30 µg/d = 0.006 x 50 5 x 10 x 2 x 1 x 1 13

Calculation of a permitted Daily Exposure PDE : Routes of Administration In the absence of data or where data are not considered sufficient for a safety assessment for the parenteral and or inhalation route of administration, modifying factors based on oral bioavailability were used to derive the PDE from the oral PDE: Oral bioavailability <1%: divide by a modifying factor of 100; Oral bioavailability 1% and <50%: divide by a modifying factor of 10 Oral bioavailability 50% and <90%: divide by a modifying factor of 2 Oral bioavailability 90%: divide by a modifying factor of 1. If no bioavailability data or occupational inhalation exposure limits Oral PDE divided by a modifying factor of 100 14

15

16

17

18

19

Avertissement Lien d intérêt : personnel salarié de l (opérateur de l Etat). La présente intervention s inscrit dans un strict respect d indépendance et d impartialité de l vis-à-vis des autres intervenants. Toute utilisation du matériel présenté, doit être soumise à l'approbation préalable de l. Warning Link of interest: employee of (State operator). This speech is made under strict compliance with the independence and impartiality of as regards other speakers. Any further use of this material must be submitted to prior approval.