"Lack of activity destroys the good condition of every human being, while movement and methodical physical exercise save it and preserve it.

Similar documents
QuantifyingObesityinEconomicResearch: HowMisleadingistheBodyMasIndex?

Quantifying Obesity in Economic Research: How Misleading is the Body Mass Index?

Implications of a Healthier U.S. Food Stamp Program

Economics 345 Applied Econometrics

WRITTEN PRELIMINARY Ph.D. EXAMINATION. Department of Applied Economics. January 17, Consumer Behavior and Household Economics.

Smoking Status and Body Mass Index in the United States:

Final Exam - section 2. Thursday, December hours, 30 minutes

The Demand for Cigarettes in Tanzania and Implications for Tobacco Taxation Policy.

Since 1980, obesity has more than doubled worldwide, and in 2008 over 1.5 billion adults aged 20 years were overweight.

BMI may underestimate the socioeconomic gradient in true obesity

Why Do We Treat Obesity? Epidemiology

Economics of obesity

Underweight Children in Ghana: Evidence of Policy Effects. Samuel Kobina Annim

EXAMINING THE EDUCATION GRADIENT IN CHRONIC ILLNESS

Is there an association between waist circumference and type 2 diabetes or impaired fasting glucose in US adolescents?

Understanding Statistics for Research Staff!

Associations Between Diet Quality And Adiposity Measures In Us Children And Adolescents Ages 2 To 18 Years

Economics of Smoking. Introduction. What Next? Jerome Adda, UCL. 1. Taxes, Cigarette Consumption and Smoking Intensity. outline

Motherhood and Female Labor Force Participation: Evidence from Infertility Shocks

Exam 2 Solutions: Monday, April 2 8:30-9:50 AM

How well targeted are soda taxes?

Long-term physician costs associated with obesity

Chapter 1 Review Questions

Does information matter? The effect of the meth project on meth use among youths Journal of Health Economics 29 (2010)

Københavns Universitet. Financial penalties on unhealthy foods Smed, Sinne. Publication date: 2011

The Effects of Food Stamps on Obesity

Midterm STAT-UB.0003 Regression and Forecasting Models. I will not lie, cheat or steal to gain an academic advantage, or tolerate those who do.

Is Knowing Half the Battle? Behavioral Responses to Risk Information from the National Health Screening Program in Korea

Metabolic Syndrome: Bad for the Heart and Bad for the Brain? Kristine Yaffe, MD Univ. of California, San Francisco

Groupe d Analyse Économique An Analysis Group Company

Effects of smoking and smoking cessation on productivity in China

Hana Ross, PhD American Cancer Society and the International Tobacco Evidence Network (ITEN)

Economics of Cannabis and Demand for Farm Labor. California Agriculture and Farm Labor 2017 April 14, 2017

Setting The setting was a hospital and the community. The economic analysis was carried out in the USA.

The Dynamic Effects of Obesity on the Wages of Young Workers

Nisreen Salti Associate Professor Department of Economics American University of Beirut

Anssi Auvinen University of Tampere STUK Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority International Agency for Research on Cancer

Childhood Obesity in Dutchess County 2004 Dutchess County Department of Health & Dutchess County Children s Services Council

The Effects of Economic Self-Help Group Programs on Women s Empowerment: A Systematic Review

Social Effects in Blau Space:

The Cost of Tobacco in Nova Scotia: An Update

VI. Behavioral Concerns

Situation of Obesity in Different Ages in Albania

New Jersey s Comprehensive Tobacco Control Program: Importance of Sustained Funding

Roadmap. Diabetes and the Metabolic Syndrome in the Asian Population. Asian. subgroups 8.9. in U.S. (% of total

ESTUDIOS SOBRE LA ECONOMIA ESPAÑOLA

PREVENTION FOR A HEALTHIER AMERICA: Investments in Disease Prevention Yield Significant Savings, Stronger Communities

4/16/2014. w w w. I C A o r g

Measures of Association

Biostatistics and Epidemiology Step 1 Sample Questions Set 1

Colorado Health Disparities Profiles

Community Health Needs Assessment

Introduction: Statistics, Data and Statistical Thinking Part II

Beer Purchasing Behavior, Dietary Quality, and Health Outcomes among U.S. Adults

Instrumental Variables I (cont.)

Rising cigarette prices and rising obesity: Coincidence or unintended consequence?

Advertising, Promotion, Countermarketing, and Tobacco Use. Frank J. Chaloupka University of Illinois at Chicago

CHRONIC DISEASE PREVALENCE AMONG ADULTS IN OHIO

Colorado Health Disparities Profiles

Save Lives and Save Money

School Meals. Helen H Jensen, Iowa State University. Farm and Food Policy and Obesity, UC Davis, CA May 21, 2010

Obesity and mortality

The Effects of Soybean Protein Changes on Major Agricultural Markets

Unhealthy consumption behaviors and their intergenerational persistence: the role of education

Everyday!!! Childhood Obesity

Burden of Cancer in California

Diet Quality and History of Gestational Diabetes

Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health TRENDS IN WOMEN S HEALTH 2006 FOREWORD

The Food Stamp Program, Energy Balance, and Weight Gain

County-Level Small Area Estimation using the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)

Food Insecurity and Obesity among Adults

FACTORS INFLUENCING ADOLESCENT BMI IN URBAN CHINA

Does Consumer Behaviour on Meat Consumption Increase Obesity? - Empirical Evidence from European Countries

The Effect of Fast Food Restaurants on Type 2 Diabetes Rates

The Effects of Maternal Alcohol Use and Smoking on Children s Mental Health: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth

Psychosocial Correlates of Youth Smoking in Mississippi

Santa Clara County Highlights

Analyzing diastolic and systolic blood pressure individually or jointly?

IS THERE A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EATING FREQUENCY AND OVERWEIGHT STATUS IN CHILDREN?

Estimating price elasticity for tobacco in Canada s Aboriginal communities

Behavioral probabilities

MEA DISCUSSION PAPERS

Continuum of a Declining Trend in Correct Self- Perception of Body Weight among American Adults

Highlights. Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Weight and Tobacco. A scientific random sample telephone survey of 956 citizens in. Athens-Clarke County

THE ECONOMICS OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO TAXATION IN BANGLADESH

Food Labels and Weight Loss:

County Health Rankings Monroe County 2016

Gene-Environment Interactions

Low-Carbohydrate Diets and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Population-based Cohort Study and Pooling Prospective Studies

Objective: To describe a new approach to neighborhood effects studies based on residential mobility and demonstrate this approach in the context of

County Health Rankings Baldwin County 2016 Graphics of County Health Rankings Include All Counties In the North Central Health District

Nutritional concerns of overweight / obese older persons. Gordon L Jensen, MD, PhD Dept Nutritional Sciences Penn State University

Despite substantial declines over the past decade,

PHACS County Profile Report for Searcy County. Presented by: Arkansas Center for Health Disparities and Arkansas Prevention Research Center

Welcome to this series focused on sources of bias in epidemiologic studies. In this first module, I will provide a general overview of bias.

The Economics of Obesity

Instrumental Variables Estimation: An Introduction

Does cigarette smoking affect body weight? causal estimates from the clean indoor air law discontinuity

Using Pre-clinical Biomarkers and Epidemiological Methods to Assess the Effects of Cannabinoids on Disease

Depok-Indonesia STEPS Survey 2003

Transcription:

Leave all the afternoon for exercise and recreation, which are as necessary as reading. I will rather say more necessary because health is worth more than learning. - Thomas Jefferson "Lack of activity destroys the good condition of every human being, while movement and methodical physical exercise save it and preserve it." - Plato

Quantifying Obesity in Economic Research Joanna C. Parks, Aaron D. Smith, and Julian M. Alston University of California, Davis Farm and Food Policy and Obesity Workshop UC Davis Conference Center May 21 st -22 nd, 2010

BMI is Ubiquitous Economists and epidemiologists use BMI to : Estimate relative risk of death and disease for overweight and obese. Calculate costs of obesity and related conditions. Estimate effect of economic factors on obesity. Q: But what if BMI poorly predicts obesity and negative health outcomes? Q: How might economist s estimates be biased when BMI used as a proxy for obesity?

What We Do Evaluate BMI as a predictor of obesity as measured by percent body fat (PBF) and the metabolic syndrome (TMS). Quantify nature and magnitude of measurement error bias. Evaluate BMI as a predictor of morbidity and mortality relative to our obesity index. Quantify nature and magnitude of measurement error bias.

Obesity Measures Differ Underweight Overweight Normal Obese Underweight Overweight No metabolic abnormalities 2 symptoms of TMS Normal The Metabolic Syndrome Obese Cardiovascular disease 1 symptom of TMS 3 symptoms of TMS Type II diabetes

Obesity Measures Differ BMI<18.5 25<BMI<30 18.5<BMI<25 30<BMI<35 PBF<8 20<PBF<25 No metabolic abnormalities 8<PBF<20 2 symptoms of TMS PBF>20 1 symptom of TMS 3 symptoms of TMS

Data: NHANES III Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, conducted 1988-1994. Individual and household characteristics Lab tests and exam measurements Mortality follow-up Diet recall Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) readings allow for the calculation of PBF. 30,818 observations w/ exam data. Have PBF and all other variables for 14,958 respondents.

BMI as a Proxy for PBF % Body Fat 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Women Red indicates different BMI and PBF weight c45egory Blue indicates same BMI and PBF weight category 45% of women classified differently by BMI vs. PBF 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 BMI Note: The implied healthy/normal % body fat range for women is 27.1-33.2%.

BMI as a Proxy for PBF % Body Fat 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Red indicates different BMI and PBF weight category Men Blue indicates same BMI and PBF weight category 55% men classified differently by BMI vs. PBF 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 BMI Note: The implied healthy/normal % body fat range for men is 17.1-21.9%.

BMI as Proxy for PBF Would like to model determinants of obesity and estimate: 1. PBFi =β X i +εi Xs are individual characteristics, βs are the coefficients of interest. But economist (usually) does not observe PBF, so they estimate: 2. BMI =γ X + u i i i

Measurement Error Bias Measurement error bias exists when X i contains more or different information about BMI than it does about PBF Measurement error bias present if δ 0 in the regressions: PBF =α BMI +δ X +ν 3. i i i i

Interpreting Measurement Error Bias: δ > 0 Individual Characteristics (causes) Estimated effect of X on obesity biased downward Estimated effect of X on health risk bias upward Obesity Health Outcomes (consequences)

Percent Body Fat Measurement Error Regressions Women Men BMI 1.01** 0.83** Age 0.07** 0.05 Age 2-0.0006** -0.0002 Black 0.90** 0.31 Current Smoker -0.29 0.02 Ex-Smoker -0.01 0.35 Heavy Alcohol Use -0.21-0.32 Menopause 0.65** < 5 Yrs HRT 0.28 > 5 Yrs HRT 1.05** Insomnia Spells -0.28-0.02 Hypersomnia Spells -0.06-0.37 Constant 6.25** -0.02 Observations 7,738 7,220 R 2 0.72 0.46 Null F-Stat 48.08 33.40 Null p-value 0.00 0.00 Notes: **p<0.01, *p<0.05. HRT=hormone replacement therapy (estrogen).

The Metabolic Syndrome Measurement Error Regressions Women Men BMI 0.0316** 0.0473** Age -0.0013 0.0094** Age 2 0.0001** -0.0000 Black -0.0621** -0.0935** Current Smoker 0.0251 0.0736** Ex-Smoker 0.0144 0.0642** Heavy Alcohol Use -0.0265-0.0539** Menopause 0.0950** < 5 Yrs HRT 0.0255 > 5 Yrs HRT -0.0008 Insomnia Spells 0.0150 0.0038 Hypersomnia Spells 0.0468 0.0022 Constant -0.6773** -1.2756** Observations 7,738 7,220 R 2 0.34 0.35 Null F-Stat 34.10 34.48 Null p-value 0.00 0.00 Notes: **p<0.01, *p<0.05. HRT=hormone replacement therapy (estrogen). TMS is binary indicator for having the metabolic syndrome according to IDF definition.

Measuring Obesity as Increased Health Risk from Excess Fat F i is a healthy amount of fat D i equals one in the event of a bad health outcome. Then obesity index for i is: ( 1, ) ( 1, ) OB = Pr D = F X Pr D = F X i i i i i i i

The Obesity Index Combines the effects of excess adipose tissue, abdominal obesity, and metabolic abnormalities on the risk of disease and death. 4. TMS i = the # of TMS criteria satisfied by i ( = ) =β +β +β ( ) i 1 i, i 0 1 i 2 i Pr D F X PBF PBF ( ) +β Female PBF +β Female PBF 3 i i 4 i i ( ) +β Black PBF +β Black PBF 5 i i 6 i i +β TMS +β Female TMS 7 i 8 i i +β Black TMS + θ X 9 i i i 2 2 2

Measurement Error Bias 5. 6. ( ) (, ) 0 Pr D = 1 F, X = {obesity index } +θ X i i i i i Pr D = 1 F X =φ +α BMI +η X i i i i i i Measurement error bias problem if : η θ=δ 0 i.e., when the coefficients on X differ depending on which measure of fatness is used to predict health outcomes.

Interpreting Measurement Error Bias: δ > 0 Individual Characteristics Estimated effect of X on obesity biased downward Estimated effect of X on health risk biased upward Obesity Health Outcomes

BMI vs. PBF-TMS Obesity Index Effects on Health Outcomes Type II Diabetes Death Death from Obesity Related Cause (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) BMI 0.0064** -0.001 0.0127** PBF -0.012* -0.0037-0.009 PBF 2 0.00027* 0.00009 0.0002 TMS 0.033** -0.006 0.074** Female*PBF -0.0004 0.00032 0.02991 Female*(PBF) 2-0.0001-0.00003-0.00056 Black*PBF -0.0033-0.00780 0.00012 Black*(PBF) 2 0.00005 0.00007 0.00015 Female*(TMS) 0.0105-0.00585-0.02743 Black*(TMS) 0.019* 0.01434* -0.06230** R 2 0.08 0.06 0.22 0.22 0.07 0.05

Measurement Error Biases in BMI vs. PBF-TMS Obesity Index Effects on Health Outcomes Death from Obesity Related Cause Type II Diabetes Death δ=(2)-(1) δ=(4)-(3) δ=(6)-(5) Female -0.110-0.032 0.330 Black -0.026-0.133-0.023 Age 0.002* 0.000 0.008** Age 2-0.00001 0.000-0.00005** Current Smoker 0.011** -0.001 0.022 Former Smoker 0.004* 0.001 0.017* Light Alcohol 0.000 0.000-0.059 Moderate Alcohol -0.007 0.002-0.071 Heavy Alcohol -0.005** -0.001-0.009 Mother had Type II Diabetes 0.004 0.000 0.001 Poverty Income Ratio 0.000 0.000 0.002 Insomnia Spells 0.003 0.000-0.008 Hypersomnia Spells -0.001 0.002 0.019

Conclusion BMI not closely related to obesity as measured by PBF or TMS. Low R 2 and many people misclassified by BMI vs. PBF. Age, sex, race, smoking and alcohol affect BMI and PBF (and TMS) differently. Bias in estimated causes of obesity Might misinterpret of the causes and their relative importance in explaining obesity. The measurement error is more than just noise, it is systematically related to specific variables. Misleading results for causes and consequences of obesity.

My law firm is suing your law firm because when your law firm sued the tobacco industry, you drove up the price of cigarettes, smoking rates went down, and consequently more people got fat. We re demanding from you the billions of dollars obesity costs society each year.