Creating and Understanding Logic Models for Juvenile Justice Programs. January 24, 2014

Similar documents
Kimberly McCarthy, EPISCenter Prevention Coordinator Grantwriting Training April 25, 2013 Celebration Hall - State College, PA

Evidence-based Approaches to Substance Abuse Prevention

The Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP): Using Meta-analytic Evidence to Assess Program Effectiveness

Positive Parenting Program (Triple P) July 1, June 30, 2017

The Opioid Misuse Prevention Project

Jail Diversion Programs for Animal Abuse Offenders

Communicating Program Impact- Using Research Outcomes to Promote Community Buy-in Locally

Preventing Youth Opioid Use

Maximizing the Impact of Interventions for Youth: The Importance of Risk/Needs Assessment

Program Evaluation and Logic Models. ScWk 242 Session 10 Slides

Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol [SPEP] Report

DEVELOPING A SUSTAINABILITY PLAN

RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS ANALYSIS

Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol [SPEP] Report

Use of Structured Risk/Need Assessments to Improve Outcomes for Juvenile Offenders

Juvenile Justice Vision 20/20 Fall Conference November 13, 2014 Grand Valley State University

Recommendation #1: Expand Drug Courts

Getting To Desired Outcomes:

E-Career Counseling for Offender Re-entry

YJB THEORY OF CHANGE SEMINAR 2

Preventing Sexual Violence Perpetration

Okanogan County Juvenile Department. Okanogan County Juvenile Justice Center

Focus of Today s Presentation. Partners in Healing Model. Partners in Healing: Background. Data Collection Tools. Research Design

Reducing Toxic Stress and Promoting Young People s Behavioral Health: Communities That Care

Restorative Justice. Principles are:

CORE PROGRAMS ADDITIONAL SERVICES

Leading the SART Response: A Workshop for Rural Team Coordinators

The Beauty of the Logic Model A Practical Approach to Developing and Using the Logic Model

CRIMINAL JUSTICE (CRIMLJUS)

RNR Principles in Practice

Carey Group Publishing

Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes Impact

Building the Restorative City

Abbotsford Restorative Justice & Advocacy Association. Abbotsford City Council Report 2012

Criminal Justice (CJUS)

Hennepin County Drug Court & Change the Outcome

The economic case for and against prison

Gateway to Opportunity: The City of Calgary s Response to Youth Diversion. Janice Bidyk BA, BSW, RSW

VICTIM IMPACT: LISTEN AND LEARN

Carey A. Welebob Division Director TDCJ-CJAD

Anti-Bias Programming. Elizabeth Levy Paluck Princeton University

Classification System for Evidence Based Juvenile Justice Programs in Nebraska

L i c e n s e d P s y c h o l o g i s t

Community-based sanctions

Evidence Based Practice in Behavioral Health: An Overview. 12 Steps of EBPs by Bonnie Malek, Marion County

Introduction to the Six Questions County Leaders Need to Ask. February 2017

Violence as a Health Crisis: What Does the Research Say about Reducing Violence?

MCJRP 2016 Evolving Evidence Based Practice. LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATING COUNCIL May 3, 2016

Victim-centric Policing

1/28/2009. Resources. Using Logic Models for Planning Primary Prevention Programs. We will start soon! How to Use This Technology

Using Logic Models for Planning Primary Prevention Programs. How to Use This Technology

Social Welfare and Justice

GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: IMPROVING OUTCOMES WITH THE SANCTUARY MODEL OF TRAUMA-INFORMED CARE

BJA is currently undergoing a comprehensive review of the enclosed curriculum for official approval, at which point the BJA logo may be added.

Evidence-Based Correctional Program Checklist (CPC 2.0) Acknowledgments. Purpose of the CPC 2/22/16

Trauma The impact on the mind, body, and behavior. Cheryl Turner, MA, LIMHP, LPC Center on Children, Families, and the Law University of Nebraska

RBWM Youth Offending Team. CSP/YOT Management board 9 December 2015 Louise Hulse

issue. Some Americans and criminal justice officials want to protect inmates access to

ACE! The Risk-Need- Responsivity Simulation Tool. The Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence. Solutions For Justice Professionals.

Logic Model. When do you create a Logic Model? Create your LM at the beginning of an evaluation and review and update it periodically.

Nebraska Statewide Suicide Prevention Plan

Restorative Cities a UK Perspective

Bach Harrison Youth Survey Results for 2006

JUSTICE REINVESTMENT: FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY-CENTERED OFFENDER REHABILITATION. Hon. Frank L. Racek

Maximizing the Impact of Juvenile Justice Interventions: The Importance of Risk/Needs Assessment

Designing Restorative Responses

HOW TO ARTICULATE THE PROBLEM Conducting a Situational Analysis for a Drug Abuse Prevention Programme P R O C C E R

Community Assessment Training

Over the last several years, the importance of the risk principle has been

Defining Evidence-Based : Developing a Standard for Judging the Quality of Evidence for Program Effectiveness and Utility

What works and What Doesn t in Reducing Recidivism: Some Lessons Learned from Evaluating Correctional Programs

Review of Youth Justice Group Conferencing Program

Justice Committee. Alternative Dispute Resolution. Written submission from Scottish Mediation

ACCESS TO RECOVERY. Collaborating with the Criminal Justice System

Smart BJA Initiatives and the Role of the Research Partnership

Awareness. Community Action. Groups in the. Awareness Phase. Action. SASA! Faith Supplementary Materials - Community Action Groups - Awareness 1

2017 Social Service Funding Application - Special Alcohol Funds

Updated Activity Work Plan : Drug and Alcohol Treatment

2016 Annual Meeting Conference

Criminal Justice. Criminal Justice, B.S. major Victimology Emphasis. Criminal Justice 1. Career Directions

BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATES AND SEX OFFENDER MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONALS

National Findings on Mental Illness and Drug Use by Prisoners and Jail Inmates. Thursday, August 17

Course Descriptions. Criminal Justice

Lassen Community College Course Outline

Engaging with our stakeholders

Phoenix/New Freedom Programs

Mark A. Greenwald Director of Research and Data Integrity. Laura Moneyham Assistant Secretary for Residential Services 8/21/2015 1

Problem Gambling and Crime: Impacts and Solutions

Training needs assessment summary: One-on-one interviews

Background: Objectives:

Presentation of Results of RJ Research. Dr Heather Strang Institute of Criminology Cambridge University

Best Practice Unit. Briefing Paper

Criminology Courses-1

Six Lessons Learned From Cannabis Legalization in Washington State.one researchers perspective

Gap Analysis, Objectives and Strategy Selection for Strategic Plan Update Webinar

Excellence in Prevention descriptions of the prevention programs and strategies with the greatest evidence of success

Logic models to enhance program performance

Information About Restorative Justice Victoria Written April 23, 2014

STUDENT NAME. 2. How does this justice model compare to the current justice system in your town or state?

What to Measure in Client Behavior

Transcription:

Creating and Understanding Logic Models for Juvenile Justice Programs January 24, 2014

WELCOME TODAYS PRESENTERS: Mary Ann Demi Sebrina Doyle Phyllis Law Heather Perry

A 2-pronged approach Promoting Evidence-based Programs Developing Practice-based Evidence Theoretically-based Demonstrated effects (confidence) Sponsored lists E.g., Blueprints Funding requirements Not an EBP for every community need/context Many programs/services already in widespread use Some of those may be effective Local expertise/fit

What is a Logic Model? Visual way (road map) to present how you believe the activities in your program will bring about change

What is a Logic Model? Describes program activities Links activities to the risk and protective factors you are targeting Maps out the short and long term outcomes you expect

The Purpose of Logic Models Provides stakeholders with a road map of your plan to achieve intended outcomes Communicates the purpose of your program Explains why your program is important Describes the anticipated outcomes Provides a reference point as the program is delivered

Essential Features of a Program Logic Model Program/Process Components Targets Short Term (Proximal) Outcomes Long Term (Distal) Outcomes Lessons Group Activities Homework Projects Social Skill Practice Therapy Risk Factors: Poor family relationships Attitudes toward substance use Poor social skills Protective Factors: Attachment to school Prosocial activities Positive relationships Increased knowledge Increased social skills Improved attitudes Better communication Increased school success Better relationships Decreased substance use Better mental health Decreased problem behaviors in community Norms knowledge

The Purpose of Logic Models A Logic Model allows you to apply what you know through: Prior research Outcomes you have already documented Outcomes others have documented

The Purpose of Logic Models Better position programs for success because you are able to plan for: Implementation Activities Program Evaluation Sustainability

Building a Logic Model There is no right or wrong way to do a logic model Logic models take time to build Logic models are best built as a team effort Key stakeholders Organizational Leaders Program staff

Building a Logic Model Logic models can be: Organization Specific Program specific

Your Organization/Agency Group Counseling Victim- Offender Mediation Family Group Decision Making

Things to think about: Your logic model should be focused on what is being done with the person receiving the services. Your program targets are a way to describe how you are getting to your outcomes. The direction is not the same as the destination! Your short-term outcomes should be things you are measuring (or plan to measure). Long-term outcomes are your desired outcomes for the future and should be based in research, experience, and (if possible) actual data from your program.

My Victim-Offender Mediation Program Program/ Process Components modality Targets (attitudes, values, beliefs) Short Term (Proximal) Outcomes Long Term (Distal) Outcomes Training Preparatory meeting for victim and offender (1x,2 hrs) Facilitated meeting(s) between victim and offender (1x 2 hrs) Creation of a Restitution agreement Offender/ victim learn communication skills Offender hears how crime impacted victim Offender can offer apologies to victim Victim may offer forgiveness to offender Agreement is drawn up that satisfies victim Risk Factors: -Lack of understanding of crime impact -Favorable attitudes toward antisocial behavior Protective Factors: -Empathy -Accountability for actions - Communication/ listening skills Creation of signed restitution agreement (document) Increased empathy for victim (Pre-Post) Increased accountability for actions (pre-post) Reduced favorable attitudes toward antisocial behavior (pre-post) Completion of restitution by offender (probation report) Decreased recidivism for offender (archival data) Improved prosocial behaviors (probation report)

1. Restorative Services 2. Counseling 3. Skill Building Services 1. Written Program Protocol 2. Personnel Trained in the Program and Associated Protocol 3. Monitoring the Quality of the Service Delivery 4. Organizational Procedures for Responding to Departures from the Protocol Targets for Duration and Dosage are dependent on Service Type The Commonwealth has adopted the Youth Level of Service, or YLS, as its measure of youth risk level. Scores are based on the proportion of moderate to high-risk youth participating in your services.

My Victim-Offender Mediation Program Program/ Process Components modality Targets (attitudes, values, beliefs) Short Term (Proximal) Outcomes Long Term (Distal) Outcomes Training Preparatory meeting for victim and offender (1x, 2 hrs) Facilitated meeting(s) between victim and offender (1x, 2 hrs) Creation of a Restitution agreement Offenders/ victims learn communication skills Offender hears how crime impacted victim Offender can offer apologies to victim Victim may offer forgiveness to offender Agreement is drawn up that satisfies victim Risk Factors: -Lack of understanding of crime impact -Favorable attitudes toward antisocial behavior Protective Factors: -Empathy -Accountability for actions - Communication/ listening skills Creation of signed restitution agreement (document) Increased empathy for victim (Pre-Post) Increased accountability for actions (pre-post) Reduced favorable attitudes toward antisocial behavior (pre-post) Completion of restitution by offender (probation report) Decreased recidivism for offender (archival data) Improved prosocial behaviors (probation report)

Q&A

Thank You! Evidence-based Prevention and Intervention Support Center Prevention Research Center, Penn State University 206 Towers Bldg. University Park, PA 16802 (814) 863-2568 episcenter@psu.edu www.episcenter.psu.edu The EPISCenter is a project of the Prevention Research Center, College of Health and Human Development, Penn State University, and is funded by the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency and the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare as a component of the Resource Center for Evidence- Based Prevention and Intervention Programs and Practices.

Thank You! Save the Date: February 21, 2014 at 11 am SPEP Overview and Review with an open forum Questions and Answer session to follow Evaluation of this webinar Available in Web Links panel, lower left corner of the screen The EPISCenter is listed here: http://www.episcenter.psu.edu/juvenile

EPIS Center Staff Mary Ann Demi- MDemi@episcenter.org Sebrina Doyle-Sdoyle@episcenter.org Phyllis Law-Plaw@episcenter.org Heather Perry- HPerry@episcenter.org

Additional Resources More information on building a logic model http://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resource/ 2006/02/wk-kellog-foundation-logic-modeldevelopment-guide More information on risk and protective factors https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/193409.pdf http://www.episcenter.psu.edu/sites/default/files/ctc/ Risk_Factor_Chart-Definitions_and_Behaviors.pdf http://www.episcenter.psu.edu/sites/default/files/ctc/ Protective_Factor_Chart-Definitions_and_SDS.pdf

Acknowledgements The EPISCenter is a project of the Prevention Research Center, College of Health and Human Development, Penn State University, and is funded by the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency and the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare as a component of the Resource Center for Evidence- Based Prevention and Intervention Programs and Practices. 25

Other things to consider: What training is needed to facilitate this service? Who benefits most from this service or component? How often do the activities need to happen to be effective? (Dosage) What is the average time needed at each session or with each component? (Duration) As you are putting together the information from this logic model, consider writing it down if you haven t already to create a manual or guide that states the expectations for this service or component of your service.

Thank You! Evidence-based Prevention and Intervention Support Center Prevention Research Center, Penn State University 206 Towers Bldg. University Park, PA 16802 (814) 863-2568 episcenter@psu.edu www.episcenter.psu.edu