Results of the GLAGOV Trial

Similar documents
Update on Dyslipidemia and Recent Data on Treating the Statin Intolerant Patient

Cottrell Memorial Lecture. Has Reversing Atherosclerosis Become the New Gold Standard in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease?

Methods. Background and Objectives STRADIVARIUS

The ACCELERATE Trial

Making War on Cholesterol with New Weapons: How Low Can We/Should We Go? Shaun Goodman

Spotty Calcification as a Marker of Accelerated Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis : Insights from Serial Intravascular Ultrasound

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Modulators

Arterial Wall Remodeling in Response to Atheroma Regression with Very Intensive Lipid Lowering

PCSK9 Inhibitors Are They Worth The Money? Michael J. Blaha MD MPH

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Best Lipid Treatments

Landmesser U et al. Eur Heart J 2017; /eurheartj/ehx549

ZEUS Trial ezetimibe Ultrasound Study

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Canadian Cardiovascular Lipid Guidelines

Fasting or non fasting?

4 th and Goal To Go How Low Should We Go? :

MS Sabatine, RP Giugliano, AC Keech, PS Sever, SA Murphy and TR Pedersen, for the FOURIER Steering Committee & Investigators

FOURIER: Enough Evidence to Justify Widespread Use? Did It fulfill Its Expectations?

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-516, NCT#

Impact of a 1- or 2-dose starting regimen of inclisiran, a novel sirna inhibitor to PCSK9 on time averaged LDL-C reductions over 1 year

Data Alert. Vascular Biology Working Group. Blunting the atherosclerotic process in patients with coronary artery disease.

HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

Lipids: new drugs, new trials, new guidelines

AIM HIGH for SATURN and stay SHARP; COURAGE (v1.5)

Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

Imaging Biomarkers: utilisation for the purposes of registration. EMEA-EFPIA Workshop on Biomarkers 15 December 2006

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

Cost-effectiveness of evolocumab (Repatha ) for hypercholesterolemia

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Achieving Very Low LDL-C Levels With the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in the FOURIER Outcomes Trial

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

What Role do the New PCSK9 Inhibitors Have in Lipid Lowering Treatment?

Challenges in lipid management

Characterization of Types and Sizes of Myocardial Infarction Reduced with Evolocumab in FOURIER

LO MEJOR DE EL ACC.16 CARDIOMETABOLICO

Effective Treatment Options With Add-on or Combination Therapy. Christie Ballantyne (USA)

Does IMPROVE-IT & FOURIER Confirm or Refute the LDL Hypothesis?

Modern Lipid Management:

Lessons from Recent Atherosclerosis Trials

Atherosclerosis Regression An Overview of Recent Findings & Issues

Alirocumab Treatment Effect Did Not Differ Between Patients With and Without Low HDL-C or High Triglyceride Levels in Phase 3 trials

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Anne Carol Goldberg, MD, FACP, FAHA, FNLA Washington University, St. Louis, MO USA

Flaws, Bias, Misinterpretation and Fraud in Randomized Clinical Trials

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Randomized Comparison of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Long-term Administration of AMG 145: 52-Week Results From the OSLER Study

Prospective Natural-History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis

CETP inhibition: pros and cons. Philip Barter The Heart Research Institute Sydney, Australia

PCSK9 antibodies: A new therapeutic option for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia

Industry Relationships and Institutional Affiliations

2/10/2016. Is it Time to Return to Cholesterol Goals for Optimal Patient Management? CON. Disclosures. Stipulations

Relationship Between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Atherosclerotic Disease Burden Measured by Intravascular Ultrasound

ACC/AHA GUIDELINES ON LIPIDS AND PCSK9 INHIBITORS

Cholesterol, guidelines, targets and new medications

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

New Approaches to Lower LDL-C

INFLAMMATION &THROMBOSIS INSIGHTS FROM CANTOS TRIAL AHMED NADA, FSCAI ALMOSTAKBAL HOSPITAL, JEDDAH SAUDI ARABIA

Weigh the benefit of statin treatment: LDL & Beyond

Effect of Rimonabant on Progression of Atherosclerosis in Patients With Abdominal Obesity and Coronary Artery Disease

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-518, NCT#

Role of imaging in risk assessment models: the example of CIMT

Cholesterol; what are the future lipid targets?

March 30, 2014, Joint ACC/JAMA Late-breaking Clinical Trials Session 402 American College of Cardiology, Washington DC

Control of Blood Glucose in the ICU: Reconciling the Conflicting Data

New Horizons in Dyslipidemia Management in Primary Care

Expert Meeting on Large Simple Trials (LST s)

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Nothing to disclose

Safety of Anacetrapib in Patients with or

Beyond LDL-Cholesterol

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

Common Repatha Documentation Requirements for Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia and Established CVD 1,2

Effect of PCSK9 Inhibitors on Coronary Artery Disease Progression

Inhibition of PCSK9: The Birth of a New Therapy

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer And American Heart Association

Relationship Between Atheroma Regression and Change in Lumen Size After Infusion of Apolipoprotein A-I Milano

ESC Geoffrey Rose Lecture on Population Sciences Cholesterol and risk: past, present and future

18 th Controversies-Advances:N ovem ber15,2018. U pdateonp CS K-9 Inhibition

Subclinical atherosclerosis in CVD: Risk stratification & management Raul Santos, MD

How would you manage Ms. Gold

STATINS EVALUATION IN CORONARY PROCEDURES AND REVASCULARIZATION

Statin therapy in patients with Mild to Moderate Coronary Stenosis by 64-slice Multidetector Coronary Computed Tomography

NEWS BRIEFING Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease. Moderated by: Robert Eckel, MD University of Colorado

Class Update PCSK9 Inhibitors

Drug Class Review Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin Kexin type 9 (PCSK9) Inhibitors

No relevant financial relationships

Title for Paragraph Format Slide

Get a Statin or Not? Learning objectives. Presentation overview 4/3/2018. Treatment Strategies in Dyslipidemia Management

How to Reduce Residual Risk in Primary Prevention

Lipid Lowering in Patients at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease

Il rischio residuo nella persona con diabete: come individuarlo e come trattarlo?

Lipid Management C. Samuel Ledford, MD Interventional Cardiology Chattanooga Heart Institute

Study 2 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Study Top-Line Results. October 29, 2018

Update on Lipid Guidelines and Intense Treatment of LDL-C with PCSK9 Inhibitors Carl J. Lavie, MD,FACC,FACP,FCCP

Lifetime clinical and economic benefits of statin-based LDL lowering in the 20-year Followup of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

Dyslipidemia Treatment in 2016 Novel Agents Combination Therapies Statin Intolerance

LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

New Strategies for Lowering LDL - Are They Really Worth It?

Novel PCSK9 Outcomes. in Perspective: Lessons from FOURIER & ODYSSEY LDL-C. ASCVD Risk. Suboptimal Statin Therapy

Transcription:

Results of the GLAGOV Trial Global Assessment of Plaque Regression with a PCSK9 Antibody as Measured by Intravascular Ultrasound Steven E. Nissen MD Stephen J. Nicholls MBBS PhD Consulting: Many companies Disclosure Clinical Trials: Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Cerenis, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Takeda, Novo Nordisk, The Medicines Company, and Pfizer. Companies are directed to pay any honoraria directly to charity. No personal reimbursement is accepted for directing or participating in clinical trials.

Background Prior intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) trials have shown that statins slow progression or induce regression of coronary disease in proportion to the magnitude of LDL-C reduction. No other LDL-lowering therapy has shown regression in an IVUS trial. The lowest LDL-C achieved in prior trials was approximately 60 mg/dl. Effects of lower levels remain unknown. PCSK9 inhibitors incrementally lower LDL-C when added to statins, allowing achievement of very low LDL-C levels, however, no data exist describing effects on progression.

Trial Leadership Steven E. Nissen MD Study Chair Stephen J. Nicholls MBBS PhD Principal Investigator Executive Committee Todd Anderson MD (Canada) Christie Ballantyne MD (Texas) Leslie Cho MD (USA) John Kastelein MD PhD (Netherlands) Wolfgang Koenig MD (Germany) Scott Wasserman MD (USA)* * Sponsor representative

968 patients at 197 global centers with symptomatic CAD and other high risk features. Coronary angiography showing 20-50% stenosis in a target vessel Stable, optimized statin dose for 4 weeks with LDL-C >80 mg/dl or 60-80 mg with additional high risk features Intravascular ultrasound via motorized pullback at 0.5 mm/sec through >40 mm segment Statin monotherapy 61 patients did not complete 18 months treatment Statin plus monthly SC evolocumab 420 mg 61 patients did not complete 423 statin completers 423 evolocumab completers Follow-up IVUS of originally imaged target vessel (n=846)

Baseline Demographics and Statin Usage Characteristic Placebo (N-484) Evolocumab (N=484) Age 59.8 59.8 Male Gender 72.3% 72.1% BMI kg/m 2 29.5 29.4 Diabetes 21.5% 20.2% Smoking 23.3% 25.6% Baseline statin use 98.3% 98.8% High intensity 59.9% 57.9% Moderate intensity 38.2% 40.5% Low intensity 0.2% 0.4% Baseline LDL-C 92.4 mg/dl 92.6 mg/dl

Percent Change in LDL-C During Treatment 20 LDL-C Change from Baseline (mg/dl) 10 0-10 -20-30 -40-50 -60-70 -80 Mean LDL-C 93.0 mg/dl Change from baseline 3.9% 90 mg/dl Mean LDL-C 36.6 mg/dl Change from baseline -59.8% 29 mg/dl 0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 Study Week

Primary Endpoint: Percent Atheroma Volume Change in Percent Atheroma Volume (%) 0.2 0-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-1 0.05 P = NS P < 0.0001-0.95 P <0.0001-1.2 Statin monotherapy Statinevolocumab

Secondary Endpoint: Total Atheroma Volume Change in Total Atheroma Volume (mm 3 ) 0-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6-0.9 P = NS P < 0.0001-5.8 P <0.0001-7 Statin monotherapy Statinevolocumab

Percent of Patients Showing Regression in PAV Percentage of Patients (%) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% Statin Monotherapy 47.3% 52.7% Percentage of Patients (%) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% Statin plus Evolocumab P <0.0001 for comparison to statin monotherapy group 64.3% 35.7% 0% 0% Regressors Progressors Regressors Progressors

Exploratory Subgroup: Baseline LDL-C <70 mg/dl LDL-C Change from Baseline (mg/dl) 30 20 10 0-10 -20-30 -40-50 -60-70 -80-90 Mean LDL-C 70.6 mg/dl Change from baseline 16.4% 65.5 mg/dl Mean LDL-C 24.0 mg/dl Change from baseline -58.3% 15.0 mg/dl 0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 Study Week

Exploratory Subgroup: Baseline LDL-C <70 mg/dl Percent Atheroma Volume Fraction Showing Regression 0 100% Change in PAV (%) -0.3-0.6-0.9-1.2-1.5-1.8-2.1-0.35 P = NS P < 0.0001-1.97 P <0.0001 Percentage Regressing (%) 80% 60% 40% 20% 48.0% 81.2% -2.4 Statin monotherapy 0% Statin monotherapy Statinevolocumab Statinevolocumab

Mean On-Treatment LDL-C vs. Change in PAV Change Percent Atheroma Volume (%) Locally Weighted Polynomial Regression (LOESS) Plot with 95% confidence limits On-Treatment LDL-C (mg/dl)

Interaction: Selected Prespecified Subgroups (PAV) Age < median -1.09 (-1.61, -0.57) median -0.95 (-1.47, -0.43) Interaction P value 0.70 Gender Female -1.45 (-2.15, -0.76) Male -0.86 (-1.29, -0.43) Baseline non-hdl < median -1.32 (-1.82, -0.83) median -0.67 (-1.23, -0.11) Diabetes Yes -1.32 (-2.10, -0.54) No -0.93 (-1.34, -0.51) Statin Intensity High -0.86 (-1.33, -0.39) Mod/Low -1.22 (-1.81, -0.62) 0.17 0.09 0.39 0.36-2 -1 Favors Evolocumab 0 1 2 Favors Placebo

Adverse Clinical Events and Safety Findings Event Placebo (N=484) Evolocumab (N=484) Death 0.8% 0.6% Nonfatal MI 2.9% 2.1% Nonfatal Stroke 0.6% 0.4% Hosp. for Unstable Angina 0.8% 0.6% Coronary Revascularization 13.6% 10.3% First Major Cardiovascular Event 15.3% 12.2% Injection site reactions 0% 0.4% Anti-evolocumab binding antibody NA 0.2% Neutralizing antibodies NA 0% Neurocognitive events 1.2% 1.4% New onset diabetes 3.7% 3.6% Myalgia 5.8% 7.0%

Limitations The GLAGOV trial assessed a select group of patients with coronary disease presenting for a clinically-indicated angiogram treated for only 18 months: Although retention was better than previous IVUS studies, 13% of patients did not have a follow up examination. IVUS is a useful measure of disease activity, but the critical determination of benefit and risk will require completion of large outcomes trials currently underway.

Conclusions-1 In statin-treated patients with symptomatic coronary disease, addition of evolocumab, 420 mg monthly for 18 months: Achieved LDL-C levels averaging 36.6 mg/dl compared with 93 mg/dl for a statin alone. Produced regression, mean change in PAV of -0.95% compared with +0.05% in statin-only patients, (P<0.0001). Induced regression in a greater percentage of patients, 64% vs. 47% (P<.0.0001). Post hoc analysis showed a incremental benefit for combination therapy at LDL-C levels as low as 20 mg/dl

Conclusions-2 Benefits of combination therapy were observed in patients with baseline LDL-C below the lowest levels recommended by global guidelines (<70 mg/dl). No safety issues were identified at the mean LDL-C levels of 36.6 mg/dl achieved in the trial: No excess in new onset diabetes, myalgia, or neurocognitive adverse effects. However, the sample size of the trial was modest, providing limited power for safety assessments.

SJ Nicholls and coauthors Effect of Evolocumab on Progression of Coronary Disease in Statin-Treated Patients: The GLAGOV Randomized Clinical Trial Published online November 15, 2016 Available at jama.com and mobile.jamanetwork.com jamanetwork.com

Some Final Thoughts LDL is now universally accepted as the major driver of atherosclerosis, however, the question of how far to reduce lipid levels has remained a moving target. In medical school, we were taught that a normal total cholesterol was any value <300 mg/dl. Over 4 decades, evidence has accumulated suggesting that optimal LDL-C levels for patients with coronary disease may be much lower than commonly achieved. While we await large outcome trials for PCSK9 inhibitors, the GLAGOV Trial provides intriguing evidence that clinical benefits may extend to LDL-C levels as low as 20 mg/dl.