Staging Issues: Lung Cancer & Mesothelioma. Mick Peake Clinical Lead, NCIN Chair, Lung SSCRG

Similar documents
National Breast Cancer Audit next steps. Martin Lee

North of Scotland Cancer Network Clinical Management Guideline for Mesothelioma

Shared Care Pathway for Soft Tissue Sarcomas Presenting to Site Specialised MDTs Lung /chest wall sarcomas incl. pulmonary metastatectomy Version 2

The 7th Edition of TNM in Lung Cancer.

Manchester Cancer Colorectal Pathway Board: Guidelines for management of colorectal hepatic metastases

Breast Cancer Staging

Audit Report Report of the 2011 Clinical Audit Data

National Optimal Lung Cancer Pathways. Dr Sadia Anwar Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Clinical Lead for Lung Cancer

Causation Issues. Delay in Diagnosis of Cancer Cases. Prof Pat Price Imperial College London

An Update: Lung Cancer

Guideline for the Management of Patients Suitable for Immediate Breast Reconstruction

LUNG CANCER 2010 COMPARATIVE AUDIT REPORT

LCA Lung Clinical Forum. 21 st October 2014

The Itracacies of Staging Patients with Suspected Lung Cancer

Audit Report. Lung Cancer Quality Performance Indicators. Patients diagnosed January December Published: November 2017

Audit Report. Lung Cancer Quality Performance Indicators. Patients diagnosed April 2014 March Published: May 2016

NLCA annual report analysis 2017 (for the population of 2016)

National Cancer Peer Review Sarcoma. Julia Hill Acting Deputy National Co-ordinator

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAM)

An Integrated National Strategy for Breast Cancer Audit. Martin Lee Gill Lawrence

Rare Urological Cancers Urological Cancers SSCRG

The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer (update)

Clinical Management Guideline for Small Cell Lung Cancer

Using Cancer Registration and MDT Data to Provide Information on Recurrent and Metastatic Breast Cancer

Activity Report July 2012 June 2013

GROUP 1: Peripheral tumour with normal hilar and mediastinum on staging CT with no disant metastases. Including: Excluding:

Future Direction for Cancer Registries

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAM)

COSD & Source of Referral

MDT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Professor Muntzer Mughal, UCLH

Surgical Management of Metastatic Colon Cancer: analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database

North of Scotland Cancer Network Clinical Management Guideline for Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

8th Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. Proposed by the IASLC

Northern Suburbs Clinic for Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Targeting Lung Cancer

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAM)

Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP)

Recent evidence regarding resection rate, specialism and survival in lung cancer in the UK

How can we facilitate cross-boundary working in Greater Manchester?

Audit Report. Report of the 2010 Clinical Audit Data. West of Scotland Cancer Network. Lung Cancer Managed Clinical Network

Appendix 4 Urology Care Pathways

Endobronchial Ultrasound in the Diagnosis & Staging of Lung Cancer

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY...

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Investigation and management of lung cancer Robert Rintoul. Epidemiology. Risk factors/aetiology

Lung Cancer Quality Performance Indicators

NCIN Breast Cancer Workshop 13 March 2014 Hilton Metropole, NEC, Birmingham. Kieran Horgan, Dick Rainsbury, Mark Sibbering, Gill lawrence

Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) Protocol

North of Scotland Cancer Network Clinical Management Guideline for Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix

Apples and pears? A comparison of two sources of national lung cancer audit data in England

Co-morbidity: a summary of issues from the NCIN Site-Specific Clinical Reference Groups Dr Mick Peake

Cancer and Data in the New NHS May Di Riley, Director Clinical Outcomes

Guideline for the Management of Vulval Cancer

Informatics in the new NHS : PHE and NCIN 9 months on. Nicky Coombes National Cancer Intelligence Network

MUSCLE-INVASIVE AND METASTATIC BLADDER CANCER

Lung cancer timed clinical pathways

Chemotherapy Treatment Algorithms for Urology Cancer

Audit Report Endometrial & Cervical Cancer Quality Performance Indicators

Shared Care Pathway for Soft Tissue Sarcomas Presenting to Site Specialised MDTs. Gynaecological sarcomas Version 1

Upper GI Malignancies Imaging Guidelines for the Management of Gastric, Oesophageal & Pancreatic Cancers 2012

Waikato Breast Cancer Register March 2010

Cancer and Data in the New NHS May Di Riley, Director Clinical Outcomes

Lung Cancer. Current Therapy JEREMIAH MARTIN MBBCh FRCSI MSCRD

The 8 th Edition of TNM for Lung Cancer: The IASLC Proposals.

COLORECTAL CANCER Quality Performance Indicators (QPI) Comparative Report

National analysis of lung cancer data: overview

Protocol for emergency surgical intervention in patients with a brain tumour v3

Cancer Outcomes and Services Dataset: Implications for clinical teams

SE SCOTLAND CANCER NETWORK PROSPECTIVE CANCER AUDIT LUNG CANCER REPORT ON PATIENTS DIAGNOSED 1 JANUARY 31 DECEMBER 2009

Lung Cancer Clinical Guidelines: Surgery

Cancer of Unknown Primary Service

:00-13:00 Industry Satellite Symposium 1 Room A. 13:00-13:30 Welcome reception Hall 1. 13:30-13:45 Opening and welcome Room B

Lung cancer Surgery. 17 TH ESO-ESMO MASTERCLASS IN CLINICAL ONCOLOGY March, 2017 Berlin, Germany

Colorectal Cancer Comparative Audit Report

Enterprise Interest None

Epidemiology, aetiology and the patient pathway in oesophageal and pancreatic cancers

Role of Cancer Registries and Data Banking in Quality Control of Breast Cancer Care

Understanding lymphoma: the importance of patient data

Audit Report Report of the 2012 Clinical Audit Data

The solitary pulmonary nodule: Assessing the success of predicting malignancy

Explaining Blanks and X, Ambiguous Terminology and Support for AJCC Staging

Mediastinal Staging. Samer Kanaan, M.D.

Explaining Blanks and X, Ambiguous Terminology and Support for AJCC Staging

ACRIN NLST 6654 Primary Lung Cancer. F1/F2 Interval: to (mm-dd-yyyy) 1. Date of diagnosis: (mm-dd-yyyy)

Delivering 62 Day GP Cancer Waits in a Complex Landscape. Hannah Marder Cancer Manager University Hospitals Bristol

SOUTH EAST SCOTLAND CANCER NETWORK PROSPECTIVE CANCER AUDIT

NCIN Conference Feedback 2015

Care of lung cancer patients in Northern Ireland diagnosed 2014

Clinical Management Guideline for Planning and Treatment. The process to be followed when a course of chemotherapy is required to treat:

Making the Most of Your Cancer Registry

RECTAL CANCER APPARENT COMPLETE RESPONSE (acr) AFTER LONG COURSE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY

Activity Report April 2012 March 2013

Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

National Cancer Peer Review Programme

Guideline for the Follow-up of Patients with Gynaecological Malignancies

Activity Report March 2012 February 2013

INTERNAL VALIDATION REPORT (MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAM)

Lung Cancer Imaging. Terence Z. Wong, MD,PhD. Department of Radiology Duke University Medical Center Durham, NC 9/9/09

Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma Site Specific Clinical Reference Group Data Quality Report 2009

Guidelines for the Management of Prostate Cancer West Midlands Expert Advisory Group for Urological Cancer

The New CP 3 R Application And Revisions To Standard 4.6 Integration Of The NCDB With The Accreditation Process

Upper GI Cancer Quality Performance Indicators

Transcription:

Staging Issues: Lung Cancer & Mesothelioma Mick Peake Clinical Lead, NCIN Chair, Lung SSCRG

Staging systems Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (>85%): UICC TNM v6 used until 1.1.10 transition since then to v7

UICC TNM v6 vs v7 - Lung Version 6 based on a surgical series of <5000 cases in one US institution ( Mountain ) going back to 1973, last updated 1997 Version 7 developed by the IASLC (International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer) based on multi-national, multiprofessional database of >100,000 cases

Staging systems Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (>85%): UICC TNM v6 used until 1.1.10 transition since then to v7 Small Cell Lung Cancer: Veterans Association (Limited vs Extensive disease) used widely (some variability in interpretation). UICC proposed use of TNM v7 for SCLC Mesothelioma: Two (3) systems in use, UICC TNM v6 & IMIG (International Mesothelioma Interest Group) - IMIG most accepted.

Staging systems Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (>85%): UICC TNM v6 used until 1.1.10 transition since then to v7 Small Cell Lung Cancer: Veterans Association (Limited vs Extensive disease) used widely (some variability in interpretation). UICC proposed use of TNM v7 for SCLC Mesothelioma: Historically poorly Two collected: (3) systems in use, UICC TNM Prior to v6 2005, & IMIG most (International Cancer Registries Mesothelioma Interest had stage Group) on <10% - IMIG of lung most cancer accepted. cases

National Lung Cancer Audit (England) Case ascertainment and data completeness % of trusts submitting data 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 77 93 96.5 98.1 100 Number of cases 10,920 16,922 20,639 27,818 30,155 Case ascertainment (%) 40 66 75 92 97 Data completeness (%) Stage 44 56 58 75 80 Performance status 53 58 62 68 88 Treatment 66 72 79 82 89

International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: Availability of Lung Cancer TNM Stage 2004-7

International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: Availability of Lung Cancer TNM Stage 2004-7 73.3% missing

Mapping of T,N & M to SEER summary stage 2000

A: Clinical stage IASLC Survival Curves Underpinning v7 Survival (years) B: Pathological stage Survival (years)

TNM v7 CT staging map

TNM v7 Revised Mediastinal Node map

What are the more complex clinical issues in staging? Size of tumour: prognosis and suitability of adjuvant chemotherapy Extent of N2 disease: Surgery vs chemo-radiotherapy Reliability of PET-CT stage for nodes (& some metastases): Suitability for radical therapy Number (and site) of metastases: metastatectomy

How is staging collected? Clinical stage Clinically verified largely collected at & by MDTs Data entry variable: MDT co-ordinators, audit staff, specialist nurses, clinicians, etc. Some collected as T,N & M, some as summary stage Part of the National Lung Cancer Audit programme since 2005 Pathological stage Resection specimens (then via registries) Sampling of nodes & metastases mostly recorded by MDT

Potential variation in recording of TNM versions Recommendation to switch to collection of TNM v7 (from v6) on 1.1.10 Central National Lung Cancer Audit database modified to allow collection of v6 or v7 in 2010 Some local collection software not changed until mid 2010 2010 NLCA data analysis imminent so regional and local variations in usage can be analysed

Potential errors in recording of stage Variable expertise in radiology (and other MDT members): Tendency to overstage; especially mediastinal nodes and local invasion Failure to sample PET +ve nodes (~20% false positive) Variable access to mediastinal node staging could result in a systematic variation in nodal staging Failure to sample PET positive metastases

Stage migration during diagnostic pathway CXR

Stage migration during diagnostic pathway CXR CT

Stage migration during diagnostic pathway CXR CT Biopsy of primary

Stage migration during diagnostic pathway CXR CT Biopsy of primary Nodal Sampling

Stage migration during diagnostic pathway CXR CT Biopsy of primary Nodal Sampling PET-CT

Stage migration during diagnostic pathway CXR CT Biopsy of primary Nodal Sampling PET-CT Resection

Stage migration during diagnostic pathway CXR CT Biopsy of primary Nodal Sampling PET-CT Resection

Stage migration during diagnostic pathway CXR CT Biopsy of primary Nodal Sampling PET-CT Resection

Stage migration during diagnostic pathway CXR CT Biopsy of primary Nodal Sampling PET-CT Resection

Stage migration during diagnostic pathway CXR CT Biopsy of primary Nodal Sampling PET-CT Resection

Stage migration during diagnostic pathway CXR CT Biopsy of primary Nodal Sampling PET-CT Resection

Stage migration during diagnostic pathway CXR CT Biopsy of primary Nodal Sampling PET-CT Resection

Stage migration during diagnostic pathway MDT Treatment Decision CXR CT Biopsy of primary Nodal Sampling PET-CT Resection

Summary Historically poor recording of lung cancer stage Impact of National Lung Cancer Audit TNM v7 well accepted clinically Transition between v6 complicates analyses Variation and inaccuracies in quality Vital need to collect stage at time of MDT treatment decision