Exposure-response in the presence of confounding

Similar documents
The Role of Simulation in Assessing Extrapolation Assumptions

Modeling and Simulation to Support Development and Approval of Complex Products

PKPD modelling to optimize dose-escalation trials in Oncology

Modeling & Simulation to support evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Drugs in Older Patients

Discussion Meeting for MCP-Mod Qualification Opinion Request. Novartis 10 July 2013 EMA, London, UK

Innovative Analytic Approaches in the Context of a Global Pediatric IBD Drug Development

Scientific And Regulatory Background For The Revised Bioequivalence Requirements For NTI, Steep Exposure-Response, And Drugs With Complex PK Profiles

Pharmacometric Modelling to Support Extrapolation in Regulatory Submissions

What Constitutes a Meaningful Endpoint for Establishing Exposure-Response Similarity Between Adults and Pediatric Patients?

Extrapolation in paediatric juvenile idiopathic arthritis: case study

Reflection paper on the use of extrapolation in the development of medicines for paediatrics

CLINICAL TRIAL SIMULATION & ANALYSIS

Advanced IPD meta-analysis methods for observational studies

T-Statistic-based Up&Down Design for Dose-Finding Competes Favorably with Bayesian 4-parameter Logistic Design

Adjusting the Crossover Effect in Overall Survival Analysis Using a Rank Preserving Structural Failure Time Model: The Case of Sunitinib GIST Trial

SOME STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EQUIVALENCE STUDIES USING PHARMACODYNAMIC AND CLINICAL ENDPOINTS

A Bayesian Perspective on Unmeasured Confounding in Large Administrative Databases

SHORTENING TIMELINES AND IMPROVING EFFICIENCY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT -Seamless drug development paradigms

How to weigh the strength of prior information and clarify the expected level of evidence?

The EU PIP - a step in Pediatric Drug Development. Thomas Severin Bonn,

Biomarkers in oncology drug development

E11(R1) Addendum to E11: Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Pediatric Population Step4

Clinical Endpoint Bioequivalence Study Review in ANDA Submissions. Ying Fan, Ph.D.

Regulatory Considerations for Seamless Oncology Drug Development Expansion Cohorts

FDA Use of Big Data in Modeling and Simulations

Definitive QTc Assessment in Early Phase Trials: Expectations from FDA s Interdisciplinary Review Team

Model Informed Drug Development: Is there a need to repaint the canvas?

Adaptive and Innovative Study Designs to Accelerate Drug Development from First-In-Human to First-In-Patient

Use of quantitative tools for study planning purposes and study design optimisation

Case Studies in Bayesian Augmented Control Design. Nathan Enas Ji Lin Eli Lilly and Company

The Late Pretest Problem in Randomized Control Trials of Education Interventions

Clinical Study Report AI Final 28 Feb Volume: Page:

Selection and estimation in exploratory subgroup analyses a proposal

Is a Maximal Tolerated Dose in Human useful for drug development?

Industry Experience of the Concentration-QTc Relationship in Phase 1 Studies. Corina Dota, AstraZeneca

Using dynamic prediction to inform the optimal intervention time for an abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme

Statistical Science Issues in HIV Vaccine Trials: Part I

Penn State MPH Program Competencies 2013

DRAFT GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Comparative Bioavailability Standards: Formulations Used for Systemic Effects

Regulatory Challenges in Reviewing Oncology Product Applications

Clinical Trials A Practical Guide to Design, Analysis, and Reporting

Lecture 2. Key Concepts in Clinical Research

Meta-analyses of clinical dose response

RTTE modelling of opioid consumption in postoperative pain

EXTRAPOLATION CHALLENGES IN PEDIATRIC PAH

Current Challenges and Opportunities in Demonstrating Bioequivalence

BEST PRACTICES FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF PAIN SCALE PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES IN CLINICAL TRIALS

Year in review. Vit Perlik Director of Regulatory Science and Clinical Development

95% 2.5% 2.5% +2SD 95% of data will 95% be within of data will 1.96 be within standard deviations 1.96 of sample mean

Challenges of 21 st Century Toxicology

Statistical, clinical and ethical considerations when minimizing confounding for overall survival in cancer immunotherapy trials

Development of Rational Drug Combinations for Oncology Indications - An Industry Perspective

Bayesian Dose Escalation Study Design with Consideration of Late Onset Toxicity. Li Liu, Glen Laird, Lei Gao Biostatistics Sanofi

Approach to Clinical Trials in Drug Development : Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) Outline. Outline

Instrumental Variables Estimation: An Introduction

The Importance of Early Interaction with FDA: EOP2A Experiences

Experimental Design for Immunologists

A Comparison of Methods for Determining HIV Viral Set Point

Clinical and statistical considerations of bridging approaches to alternative dosing regimen or formulations

Study No: Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Statistical Methods:

XII Michelangelo Foundation Seminar

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS

Design for Targeted Therapies: Statistical Considerations

Experimental Design and the struggle to control threats to validity

Landmarking, immortal time bias and. Dynamic prediction

Pediatric Extrapolation in FDA Submissions Sources of Data

Generic Drug Approval Process

Analysis methods for improved external validity

EMA/FDA/Health Canada Workshop on Paediatric PAH

Dynamic borrowing of historical data: Performance and comparison of existing methods based on a case study

PK/PD modeling and optimization of eltrombopag dose and regimen for treatment of chemotherapy- induced thrombocytopenia in cancer patients

Assessment of nivolumab benefit risk profile of a 240-mg flat dose relative to a 3-mg/kg dosing regimen in patients with advanced tumors

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI

Accelerating Innovation in Statistical Design

A pharmacometric framework for dose individualisation of sunitinib in GIST

Improving new drug development for paediatric cancer: the EMA and PDCO vision

Propensity scores: what, why and why not?

Rada Savic 1 Alain Munafo 2, Mats Karlsson 1

Mathematical Framework for Health Risk Assessment

Discrimination and Reclassification in Statistics and Study Design AACC/ASN 30 th Beckman Conference

A NEW TRIAL DESIGN FULLY INTEGRATING BIOMARKER INFORMATION FOR THE EVALUATION OF TREATMENT-EFFECT MECHANISMS IN PERSONALISED MEDICINE

FDA s Evidence-Based Review System

Estimating the impact of community-level interventions: The SEARCH Trial and HIV Prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa

Utilizing Seamless Adaptive Designs and Considering Multiplicity Adjustment for NASH Clinical Trials

CSRC White Papers. An update Dec. 2010

SYNOPSIS. International co-ordinating investigator Redacted

A (Constructive/Provocative) Critique of the ICH E9 Addendum

Lecture Outline. Biost 590: Statistical Consulting. Stages of Scientific Studies. Scientific Method

3 rd ICPAD Workshop Amsterdam November 8 th & 9 th

Janet E. Dancey NCIC CTG NEW INVESTIGATOR CLINICAL TRIALS COURSE. August 9-12, 2011 Donald Gordon Centre, Queen s University, Kingston, Ontario

Assessing Cardiovascular risk in different populations

Dose Regimen Selection for Biologics in IBD

Guidance for Industry

AVOIDING BIAS AND RANDOM ERROR IN DATA ANALYSIS

SYNOPSIS. The study results and synopsis are supplied for informational purposes only.

Design and Analysis of QT/QTc Studies Conceptional and Methodical Considerations Based on Experience

Risk and Benefit Assessments for Optimal Dose Selection Based on Exposure Response

Sub Population: The elderly

Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighting for Selective Crossover in Oncology Clinical Trials.

Introduction and Workshop Objectives

Transcription:

Exposure-response in the presence of confounding Jonathan L. French, ScD Metrum Research Group LLC May 3, 2016 c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 1 / 24

Outline 1 Introduction 2 Example of exposure-response with multiple doses 3 Exposure-response with one dose? 4 Concluding thoughts c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 2 / 24

Introduction Exposure-response is in the mind of the beholder Ranging across... PK-PD model K-PD model PD model driven by a summary measure derived from PK model PD model based on observed concentrations Dose-response Dose Exposure Response c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 3 / 24

Introduction What summary measures? 30 Some commonly used include: Concentration 20 AUC ss (Dose/(CL/F)) Caverage ss (AUC ss /τ) Cmax 10 Ctrough 0 0 50 100 150 200 Time (hours) c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 4 / 24

Introduction Why do we need exposure-response analyses? What do they give us that we can t learn from dose-response? May be closer to mechanism-based models Concentration of drug biomarker (possibly with a delayed effect) May allow more precise estimation when dose-response modeling isn t informed by the design (e.g., only 2-3 dose levels studied). May allow more seamless interpolation (or extrapolation) to doses or populations that weren t studied May allow us to understand if a higher dose is necessary for a subset of patients c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 5 / 24

Example of exposure-response with multiple doses (Simulated) Example of E-R with multiple doses Phase 2 dose-ranging study 3 treatment groups: placebo, 3, or 5 mg QD n=25 per group Key decision-making endpoints is a continuous landmark endpoint Objectives: Estimate E-R relationship in Phase 2 population Predict E-R in Phase 3 population and impact on dose selection Dose Exposure Response Covariates c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 6 / 24

Example of exposure-response with multiple doses Observed data show an apparant E-R relationship... 5 10 15 20 0 100 200 300 Average steady state concentration Efficacy Response Dose Exposure Response Covariates c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 7 / 24

Example of exposure-response with multiple doses Observed data show an apparant E-R relationship... 5 10 15 20 0 100 200 300 Average steady state concentration Efficacy Response X1 Low X1 High X1 There also appears to be an association with a covariate, x 1. Dose Exposure Response Covariates c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 7 / 24

Example of exposure-response with multiple doses... and two covariates are associated with exposure 100 200 300 2 1 0 1 2 X1 Average steady state concentration Dose (mg) 3 5 100 200 300 2 1 0 1 2 X2 Average steady state concentration Dose (mg) 3 5 Dose Exposure Response Covariates c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 8 / 24

Example of exposure-response with multiple doses Exposure-response models 4-parameter Emax model for efficacy: Emax Y i = θ 0 + Emax i Cavgss γ EC50 γ + Cavgss γ ɛ i N ( 0, σ 2) + ɛ i Gamma gamma = 1 gamma = 3 We will model the maximum effect as a function of X1: Response Emax i = θ 1 + θ 2 x 1i EC50 = exp(θ 3 ) γ = exp(θ 4 ) EC50 Exposure c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 9 / 24

Example of exposure-response with multiple doses Fitted model Low X1 High X1 20 Efficacy Response 15 10 X1 Low X1 High X1 Parameter Estimate 95% CI θ 0 9.56 (8.79, 10.3) θ 1 9.91 (8.18, 18.1) θ 2 1.43 (0.60, 2.99) EC50 29.7 (20.0, 44.0) γ 1.63 (0.74, 3.60) σ 1.92 5 0 100 200 300 0 100 200 300 Average steady state concentration c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 10 / 24

Example of exposure-response with multiple doses Extrapolation to phase 3 population Based on the planned inclusion criteria the Phase 3 population is expected to have different distributions for X 1 and X 2. Density 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Phase 2 population Phase 3 population Density 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Phase 2 population Phase 3 population 4 2 0 2 4 6 4 2 0 2 4 X1 X2 c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 11 / 24

Example of exposure-response with multiple doses Expected exposure and response Higher response given exposure Lower exposure given covariates 0.020 18 0.015 Response 15 Population Phase 2 Phase 3 density 0.010 Population Phase 2 Phase 3 12 0.005 0.000 0 100 200 300 Average steady state concentration 0 100 200 300 400 Average steady state concentration at 5 mg dose c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 12 / 24

Example of exposure-response with multiple doses How do we translate this to dose-response? If we focus on the expected response, then E(Y dose, X) = E(Y Cavg ss, X) f (Cavg ss dose, X)dCavg ss and E(Y dose,popn) = E(Y Cavg ss, X) f (Cavg ss dose, X) f (X Popn) dcavg ss dx c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 13 / 24

Example of exposure-response with multiple doses Comparison of expected dose-response 20.0 17.5 A 4 mg dose gives 85% of maximal response in Phase 2 population. Response 15.0 Population Phase 2 Phase 3 Equivalent expected response at 6 mg dose in Phase 3 population. 12.5 10.0 Potential for higher response rates in Phase 3 population at higher doses? 0 5 10 15 Dose (mg) c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 14 / 24

Example of exposure-response with multiple doses Dose Exposure Response Covariates c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 15 / 24

Exposure-response with one dose? Can we use E-R modeling when we ve only studied one dose? Sometimes (e.g. in oncology), a single dose is studied in Phase 2 (and Phase 3). We may have some variation in exposure...... but what if exposure is related to measured (or unmeasured) confounding variables? c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 16 / 24

Exposure-response with one dose? An apparent exposure-response relationship... Suppose we want to... Estimate exposure-response relationship on the hazard ratio for trastuzumab relative to control Estimate the hazard ratio for Q1 relative to control Predict the effects of a higher dose in patients with lower exposure Yang et al. (2012) The Combination of Exposure-Response and Case-Control Analyses in Regulatory Decision Making... in an unbiased (causal) manner. c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 17 / 24

Exposure-response with one dose? What if there are covariates associated with exposure and outcome... Yang et al. (2012) The Combination of Exposure-Response and Case-Control Analyses in Regulatory Decision Making c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 18 / 24

Exposure-response with one dose?... and the distribution is different across the exposure range? Yang et al. (2012) The Combination of Exposure-Response and Case-Control Analyses in Regulatory Decision Making c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 19 / 24

Exposure-response with one dose? Potential solutions to confounded E-R Include potential confounders as covariates in the E-R model Treat the analysis as if it were from an observational study (e.g., using matching) Categorize exposure (e.g., quantiles) Calculate propensity scores (for each exposure category relative to placebo) Use for matched or weighted regression analyses c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 20 / 24

Concluding thoughts Exposure-response modeling is a key ingredient in drug development Exposure-response information is at the heart of any determination of the safety and effectiveness of drugs. FDA Guidance for Industry: Exposure-Response Relationships? Study Design, Data Analysis, and Regulatory Applications Uses an understanding of pharmacology of the drug (dose exposure) May allow the use of models closely tied to the action of the drug (exposure response) Need to consider potential for confounding/effect modification (particularly if E-R based on one dose level) c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 21 / 24

Concluding thoughts Many opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration Identifying development questions to address through exposure-response modeling (at portfolio level as well as compound level) Design of studies to inform exposure-response modeling Execution of M&S work What can statisticians do to get more involved? Be open to learning a new topic Share what you do know in a collaborative manner (e.g., knowledge of study population vs. knowledge of pharmacology) c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 22 / 24

Concluding thoughts Back-up Slides c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 23 / 24

Concluding thoughts E-R for what endpoints? (editorial aside) E-R is most believable when you re modeling endpoints that are most closely related to the mechanism of action of the drug. Concentration of drug biomarker (possibly with a delayed effect) As we move farther away from MOA, K-PD or summary measures of exposure may be reasonable e.g., average concentration tumor growth inhibition Even farther away, we may need to rely on some scientifically-based hand waving e.g., Average concentration in Cycle 1 survival c 2016 Metrum Research Group LLC TICTS, Durham, NC, 2016 May 3, 2016 24 / 24