DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Nothing to disclose

Similar documents
Culprit Lesion Remodeling and Long-term (> 5years) Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

ZEUS Trial ezetimibe Ultrasound Study

Spotty Calcification as a Marker of Accelerated Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis : Insights from Serial Intravascular Ultrasound

In-Ho Chae. Seoul National University College of Medicine

Impact of coronary atherosclerotic burden on clinical presentation and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

Revascularization in Severe LV Dysfunction: The Role of Inducible Ischemia and Viability Testing

2010 Korean Society of Cardiology Spring Scientific Session Korea Japan Joint Symposium. Seoul National University Hospital Cardiovascular Center

The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

Methods. Background and Objectives STRADIVARIUS

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-516, NCT#

Ischemic Heart and Cerebrovascular Disease. Harold E. Lebovitz, MD, FACE Kathmandu November 2010

A: Epidemiology update. Evidence that LDL-C and CRP identify different high-risk groups

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

대한심장학회춘계학술대회 Satellite Symposium

Correlation of novel cardiac marker

Declaration of conflict of interest. Nothing to disclose

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

Cardiovascular disease and diabetes Vascular harmony

Supplement materials:

GALECTIN-3 PREDICTS LONG TERM CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN HIGH-RISK CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS

Disclosures. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Management. Learning Objectives. Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Causes of death in Diabetes

Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

Title for Paragraph Format Slide

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

The Burden of the Diabetic Heart

Results of the GLAGOV Trial

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Japan

Diabetic Patients: Current Evidence of Revascularization

Unprotected LM intervention

Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, On the behalf of SMART-DATE trial investigators ACC LBCT 2018

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Felix Vallotton Ball (1899) LDL-C management in Asian diabetes: moderate vs. high intensity statin --- a lesson from EMPATHY study

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

Macrovascular Residual Risk. What risk remains after LDL-C management and intensive therapy?

High-sensitivity Troponin T Predicts Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Coronary Heart Disease: KAROLA Study 8 Year FU

Arterial Wall Remodeling in Response to Atheroma Regression with Very Intensive Lipid Lowering

CLINICAL OUTCOME Vs SURROGATE MARKER

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

ARMYDA-RECAPTURE (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) trial

Management of stable CAD FFR guided therapy: the new gold standard

A.K. Gitt, F. Towae, C. Juenger, A. Papp, R. Zahn, U. Zeymer, J. Senges For the STAR-Study-Group Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Germany

The ACCELERATE Trial

Belinda Green, Cardiologist, SDHB, 2016

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Data Alert. Vascular Biology Working Group. Blunting the atherosclerotic process in patients with coronary artery disease.

Subclinical atherosclerosis in CVD: Risk stratification & management Raul Santos, MD

Supplementary table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants by paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) gene polymorphisms

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Columbia University Medical Center, New York.

Case Presentation. Rafael Bitzur The Bert W Strassburger Lipid Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer

Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Evolving Revascularization Strategies

Risk Assessment of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus in patient on antihypertensive medication

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

The Diabetes Link to Heart Disease

Supplementary Online Content

Coronary Artery Disease: Revascularization (Teacher s Guide)

Statin therapy in patients with Mild to Moderate Coronary Stenosis by 64-slice Multidetector Coronary Computed Tomography

Lessons from Recent Atherosclerosis Trials

Vascular disease. Structural evaluation of vascular disease. Goo-Yeong Cho, MD, PhD Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Randomized comparison of single versus double mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 5 year outcomes of the Arterial Revascularization Trial

DECISION - CTO. optimal Medical Treatment in patients with. Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD, FACC for the DECISION-CTO Study investigators

2003 World Health Organization (WHO) / International Society of Hypertension (ISH) Statement on Management of Hypertension.

Supplementary Online Content

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Modulators

The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Long-Term Outcome in Coronary Bypass Candidates Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Epicardial fat volume as a predictor of coronary vulnerable plaques using cardiac computed tomography in the patients with zero calcium score

Intercommunale de Santé Publique du Pays de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium 2

Paris, August 28 th Gian Paolo Ussia on behalf of the CoreValve Italian Registry Investigators

Patient referral for elective coronary angiography: challenging the current strategy

Statin pretreatment and presentation patterns in patients with acute coronary syndromes

How to approach non-infarct related artery disease in patients with STEMI in a limited resource setting

Hypertension Management in Diabetic Patients

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

surtout qui n est PAS à risque?

Long-term prognostic value of N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) changes within one year in patients with coronary heart disease

The Impact of Smoking on Acute Ischemic Stroke

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Clinical Significance of Aldosterone Levels and Low Grade Inflammation in Patients with Coronary Vasospasm

Canagliflozin for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the CANVAS Program

Which CVS risk reduction strategy fits better to carotid US findings?

Flaws, Bias, Misinterpretation and Fraud in Randomized Clinical Trials

David Ramenofsky, MD Bryan Kestenbaum, MD

Michael Mack, M.D. Baylor Healthcare System Heart Hospital Baylor Plano Dallas, TX

Presented by Terje R. Pedersen Oslo Disclosure: Research grants and/or speaker- / consulting fees from Merck, MSP, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer

2/17/2010. Grace Lin, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine University of California, San Francisco

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

How will new high sensitive troponins affect the criteria?

Comparison of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target value and the preventive effect of statins in elderly patients and younger patients

Transcription:

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST Nothing to disclose

Four-Year Clinical Outcomes of the OLIVUS (Impact of OLmesartan on progression of coronary atherosclerosis; evaluation by IntraVascular UltraSound ) trial; - OLIVUS Extended - Atsushi Hirohata, Keizo Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Imai, Keitaro Senoh, Eiki Hirose, Yuhei Kobayashi, Hiroya Takafuji, Fumihiko Sano, Minako Ohara, Keisuke Ohkawa, Yuko Toyama, Kazumasa Nosaka, Junji Yoshida, Yuzuru Iino and Tohru Ohe, Japan

Atsushi Hirohata Keizo Yamamoto Toru Miyoshi Kunihiko Hatanaka Yoshihiro Imai Keitaro Senoh Yuhei Kobayashi Hiroya Takafuji Eiki Hirose Fumihiko Sano Keisuke Ohkawa Yuko Toyama Yuzuru Iino Kazumasa Nosaka Junji Yoshida Tohru Ohe

Background (1) Extensive cardiovascular disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease. Optimal plaque management is a key strategy for preventing subsequent cardiovascular events. The OLIVUS trial, using serial volumetric IVUS, reported a positive role in achieving lower rated of coronary atheroma progression through the administration of Olmesartan, an ARB, for stable angina patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) 1). Hirohata A,et al.:j Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55(10):976-982

Background (2) However, the direct benefits between ARB administration on long-term clinical outcomes and serial atheroma changes by IVUS remain unclear.

Purpose OLIVUS Extended; To examine the 4-year clinical outcomes from OLIVUS trial according to treatment strategy with Olmesartan.

OLIVUS; Methods Prospective, randomized, multicenter trial Two hundreds forty-seven stable angina pectoris patients with hypertension undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were selected. After PCI for their culprit lesions, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was performed in their non-culprit vessels (without angiographically documented coronary stenosis [<50%]) to determine atheroma volume at baseline.

247 patients randomized Baseline PCI, IVUS Control (n=121) Olmesartan (10-40mg, n=126) β-blockers, CCB glycemic control agents OLIVUS trial -12-16months CAG, IVUS - MACCE statins 102 completed serial IVUS 103 completed serial IVUS 48months Clinical Follow-up OLIVUS Extended: Major adverse cerebro- and cardiovascular events during 4-years

Changes in Atheroma Volume ( Baseline 14-months, OLIVUS Primary Endpoint ) Control (%) (%) 10 P =0.016 P =0.038 5 Olmesartan 5.4 * (2.4 to 8.5) 3.1 * (0.7 to 5.6) 0.6 (-1.9 to 3.1) 0 0-0.7 (-3.4 to 2.0) -10 Atheroma Volume -5 Percent Atheroma Volume ( * p<0.05 from baseline to follow-up) Hirohata A,et al.:j Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55(10):976-982

247 patients randomized Baseline PCI, IVUS Control (n=121) Olmesartan (10-40mg, n=126) β-blockers, CCB glycemic control agents OLIVUS trial -12-16months CAG, IVUS - MACCE statins 102 completed serial IVUS 103 completed serial IVUS 48months Clinical Follow-up OLIVUS Extended: Major adverse cerebro- and cardiovascular events during 4-years (233/247=93%)

OLIVUS Extended; Major Adverse Cerebro and Cardiovascular Event (MACCE) Death from cardiac or cerebral causes Myocardial infarction Stroke (neurologic deficit confirmed by CT or MRI) Unstable or progressive angina (according to the Braunwald unstable angina classification and the CCS angina classification) Deterioration of heart function or renal failure

Baseline Patient Characteristics Control (n=121) Olmesartan (n=126) P-value Male (%) 68 76 NS Age(years) 68.4 ± 8.8 67.8 ± 8.7 NS Smoking (%) 31 34 NS Diabetes (%) 35 31 NS Oral Diabetic Agents (%) 17 20 NS Insulin (%) 7.1 5.6 NS History of Coronary Artery Disease (%) 13 15 NS Anti-hypertensive Agents (%) 39 40 NS β-blocker (%) 13 13 NS Calcium Channel Blockers (%) 50 41 NS Statins (%) 74 71 NS

Blood parameters at Baseline and 4-years follow-up Baseline Follow-up Control Olmesartan P- value Control Olmesartan P- value Total cholesterol(mg/dl) 185.9±34.3 183.3±29.6 0.554 183.8±37.0 181.4±30.4 0.941 HDL-C(mg/dl) 50.4±12.6 * 47.1±12.7 * 0.073 56.1±15.2 * 52.6±13.3 * 0.084 Triglyceride(mg/dl) 142.4±64.6 163.9±126.4 0.131 140.4±73.9 158.7±81.0 0.093 LDL-C(mg/dl) 108.0±30.2 106.8±24.8 0.405 101.7±30.8 101.2±26.2 0.915 Body Mass Index (kg/m2) 23.9±3.5 24.7±3.2 0.091 23.7±3.0 24.3±4.3 0.270 Creatinine (mg/dl) 1.00±0.41 0.99±0.25 0.844 0.92±0.44 0.97±0.29 0.153 e-gfr (ml/min/1.73m2) 57.9±19.2 59.6±17.5 0.517 HbA1c (%) 5.9±1.2 6.1±1.1 0.358 5.7±0.9 5.9±0.9 0.242 BNP (pg/dl) 49.8±47.2 45.1±29.7 0.482 46.9±67.9 37.4±32.3 0.211 ( * P<0.01, P,0.05 between baseline to follow-up)

(mmhg) 180 Serial Changes of Blood Pressure 1 6 0 142.4±24.3 144.4±23.6 138.4±21.4 137.9±25.3 133.1±20.5 135.4±26.1 1 4 0 1 2 0 Olmesartan 1 0 0 79.2±10.8 81.1±12.9 74.7±14.6 77.4±11.3 Control 73.6±14.6 74.9±12.8 8 0 Baseline 14-months 4-years ( P<0.05, P<0.01, between baseline to follow-up)

Adjudicated Major Cerebro and Cardiovascular Events during 4-years Composite of Cardio or Cerebrovascular death, MI, stroke, angina, or heart / renal failure Control (n=121) Olmesartan (n=126) 17.4 8.0 0.04 Death (All cause) 3.3 3.2 0.95 Cardio or Cerebrovascular death 1.7 0.8 0.51 Nonfatal myocardial infarction 0.8 1.6 0.59 Nonfatal stroke 1.7 0 0.15 Unstable angina 10.7 4.8 0.10 (Culprit related / new de novo coronary lesions) 5.0/5.7 3.2/1.4 Deterioration of Heart / Renal Failure 2.5 0.8 0.30 p

(%) 100 Cumulative Event-free from Cerebro or Cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, angina, or heart / renal failure 90 P=0.04 (log-rank test) 80 70 Control Olmesartan 60 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 (Days)

OLIVUS-extended Hazards Ratio for Major Cerebro and Cardiovascular Events (Adjusted model, 95% CI) Age >70 2.85(0.69-6.01) Olmesartan 0.76 (0.45-0.89) Statins 0.84 (0.68-1.10) Hx of IHD Annual %ATV progression > 20% 3-Vessel Disease HbA1c>7.5% (Baseline) 2.25 (0.71-3.27) 1.91 (0.83-2.88) 3.41 (1.58-6.72) 3.08 (1.33-5.14) 0.1 1 10 (IHD; Ischemic Heart Disease, %ATV; Percent Atheroma Volume)

% Atheroma Volume Changes (Baseline 14-months) Annual Atheroma Progression with or without MACCE (%) 30 23.8±18.7 20 P < 0.001 10 2.1±13.8 0 MACCE (+) (n=31) MACCE (-) (n=216)

Serial Changes of Biomarkers Control Olmesartan (mg/l) 0 (μg/ml) 4 -. 0 5. 1 3 2 P=0.0007 -.15 1. 2 -. 2 5 P=0.0183 0-1 -. 3 hs-crp (FU-Baseline) - 2 Adiponectin (F/U-Baseline)

Summary Composite rate of MACCE and cumulative event-free survival for 4-years were significantly better in the Olmesartan group than in the control group. By adjusting for validated prognosticators, Olmesartan administration was identified as a good predictor of MACCE. Patients with adverse events had larger annual atheroma progression than the rest of the population.

Limitation Enrolled small number of stable angina patients In the current study, high proportion of patients (previously taking >40%, and >70% from beginning of trial) were already being treated with optimal lipidlowering therapy, therefore, it may be difficult to show an effect in addition to that treatment.

Conclusions Olmesartan therapy appears to confer improved long-term clinical outcomes. Atheroma volume changes, assessed by IVUS, seem to be a reliable surrogate for future major adverse cerebro- and cardiovascular events in this study cohort.