USDA field safety study summary: 1

Similar documents
USDA field safety study summary: 1. Intense safety in young calves: 2. High-risk stocker cattle study: 3

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. INFORCE 3: Aids in the prevention of respiratory disease caused by infectious bovine rhinotracheitis. INF

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. INFORCE 3: Prevents respiratory disease caused by bovine respiratory syncytial virus. INF January 2016

YOU NEED CHOICES. Elanco now brings you a comprehensive line of cattle vaccine health management solutions for your operation.

CHALLENGE VIRUS TREATMENT GROUP PI POSITIVE VIREMIA POSITIVE LEUKOPENIA POSITIVE. Vaccinates 1/22 (4.5%) 0/22 (0%) 8/22 (36.4%)

The second-most significant disease in dairy operations. 6 22% of unweaned heifer deaths 6 46% of weaned heifer deaths 6

Influence of Weaning Vaccine Selection on Pre- Breeding Vaccine Options. Paul H. Walz, DVM, PhD Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine

Roberto A. Palomares DVM, MS, PhD, Dip ACT

MARKETING HEALTHY CALVES THAT STAY HEALTHY

Disclosure and thanks. Vaccinating Calves: Questions. February 22, Effective Vaccination of Calves

Introduction: Goals and expectations of vaccination programs in beef cattle intended for show purposes

Introduction. Transmission

Vaccine Protocols for the Cow Calf Producer of Central California

Maximizing your Profits in a Down Market Toby Hoffman Zoetis Territory Business Manager

7 VETERINARY PROTOCAL INSTROUDUTION

Cattle Vaccination Programs & Immune System Functions

How can it affect Your operation?

Jin-An Huang VMRD Beijing

ELANCO CATTLE VACCINE PORTFOLIO

Response to Modified Live and Killed Multivalent Viral Vaccine in Regularly Vaccinated, Fresh Dairy Cows*

TOC INDEX. Bovine Respiratory Syncytial Virus. John A. Ellis. Take Home Message. Cause and Spread

On The Road to Control Disease. How to Get the Most out of Your Vaccination Program. Credits. Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex BRDC

Vaccinations for the Beef Cattle Herd

Onset of Protection from Experimental Infection with Type 2 Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus Following Vaccination with a Modified-Live Vaccine*

Bovilis IBR Marker Live VACCINATION WITHOUT COMPLICATION

Environmental and management factors influencing BVDV antibody levels and response to vaccination in weanling calves

Paul-Ehrlich-Institut DE/V/0022/001/II/023/G Page 1

The success story of BVD virus

Control of Pestivirus Infections in Cattle. P.D. Kirkland, Virology Laboratory, EMAI

Bovine Virus Diarrhea Virus. Jessica Seate LCS 630 Rotation

EVALUATION OF IMMUNE RESPONSE AND PERFORMANCE IN STEERS OF KNOWN GENETIC BACKGROUND VACCINATED AND CHALLENGED WITH BOVINE VIRAL DIARRHEA VIRUS

Best practice guide for the control of bovine respiratory disease

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

BVD Overview. The Disease, Management & Control

Effectiveness of Vaccination Programs in Replacement Heifers

Respiratory Disease in Dairy and Beef Rearer Units

Metaphylactic Use of DRAXXIN (tulathromycin) in Weaned Dairy Calves at High Risk for Infectious Respiratory Disease

DNA Immunostimulant: A New Tool to Help Reduce BRD Lung Lesions and Mortality Associated with Mannheimia haemolytica

Pneumonia in Beef Cattle

Persistently infected BVDV animals on the dairy can contribute to a host of problems; elimination involves a two-step approach.

BOVINE RESPIRATORY DISEASE COMPLEX น.สพ.ฐปณ ฐ สงคส ภา สถาบ นส ขภาพส ตว แห งชาต

Vaccinating Heifers to Help Prevent Disease

REDUCE the USE. of antibiotic pneumonia treatments. Vaccinate with...

TOC INDEX. Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis. S. van Drunen Littel - van den Hurk. Take Home Message. Introduction

TECHNICAL BULLETINMay 2016

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Table 1: Pneumonia antibody results from calves 6-12 months of age, taken January 2015.

SUPPORTS BEEF PRODUCTION FROM START TO STEAK KEEPING AN EYE ON A HEALTHY BOTTOM LINE. Stocker / Feeder Industry

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Additional Nutritional Considerations for Preconditioning Beef Calves 1

Bovine Coronavirus Updates. Jeremy Schefers DVM, PhD Minnesota Veterinary Diagnostic Labortory

Investigating respiratory disease

Cattle Farming. Our wealth Standby team

Pasturella and its Impact on Stocker Health. John F. Currin, DVM VMCVM

FluSure XP TM Update with Regards to 2009 H1N1 Swine Influenza Virus

Caring for the Future of the Herd: Raising Healthy Calves. Kate Smith, DVM Mid-Valley Veterinary Hospital Orland, CA

NATIONAL BVD CONTROL PROGRAMME

Control of Bovine Virus Diarrhoea (BVD)

Use of vaccines in dairy and beef cattle production

A study of Pestivirus in eastern Australia:

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

TOC INDEX. Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD) Jan V. van den Hurk. Take Home Message. Introduction

Immunology, Vaccines, and Prevention of Salmonella

Sensitivity and specificity of multiple technologies for the detection of confirmed persistently BVDV infected cattle from a feed yard in South Texas

Bovine Herpes Virus type 1 (BoHV-1), strain Difivac (ge-negative), to induce a geometric mean seroneutralizing titre of at least 1:160 in cattle

My presentation is about bovine neonatal diarrhea, more commonly referred to as calf scours. As always, good management is an important factor when

Investigation of the genetic differences between bovine herpesvirus type 1 variants and vaccine strains

Credits. Immunity in the Neonate. Neonatal Immunology All food animals are immunocompetent at birth. Colostral Anti-inflammatory Cytokines

Effect of Energy Level and a Fibrolytic Enzyme on Performance and Health of Newly Received Shipping Stressed Calves

Report of the Veal Calf Vaccination Study with Bovilis Bovipast (MSD Animal Health)

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

CUSTOMIZED CONTROL. Because every herd is unique

Research & Development

PART 1 B SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS, LABELLING AND PACKAGE LEAFLET

EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE IN YEARLING CROSSBRED STEERS FOLLOWING BOVINE VIRAL DIARRHEA VIRUS CHALLENGE. A Dissertation CHASE ANTHONY RUNYAN

INNOVATIVE IMMUNO THERAPY

GRETCHEN PHOEBE GRISSETT. B.S., Mississippi State University, 2007 D.V.M., Mississippi State University, 2010 A THESIS

Calf pneumonia: diagnostics and vaccination protocols

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle December 3-4, 2012; Sioux Falls, SD

Vaccination Recommendations Practice and Shelter-Housed Dogs

Blijft BVDV altijd BVDV? Niets is zo veranderlijk als een RNA virus. Frank van der Meer November 30, 2016

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) continues to be an

Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVD

The Economic Impact of BVD in a Herd. Slides available on website mid February

ABSTRACT Researches on respiratory virosis of cattle

ZOETIS ARE PROUD TO SUPPORT THE JOINT ACTION AGAINST BLUETONGUE CAMPAIGN

BVDFree England FAQs

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle October 3 and 4, 2006, Rapid City, South Dakota

Gripovac 3 is an inactivated, adjuvanted vaccine intended for active immunisation of pigs against disease caused by Swine Influenza Virus.

PEDV Research Updates 2013

FELINE INFECTIOUS D ISE A SE S

Calfhood pneumonia incited by acutely infecting viruses

Calf Scours. Webinar written and presented by Dr Tim Potter BVetMed MRCVS

Outline. Assessing health data. Record keeping basics Case example & staffing. Neonatal calf diarrhea. Components of a multifactorial disease process

Calf Investigation Data

Biosecurity in Dairy and Beef Cattle

G. INNOCENT *, I. MORRISON, J. BROWNLIE AND G. GETTINBY. (Accepted 3 February 1997)

landbouw, natuur en voedselkwaliteit Epidemiological report BTV 6 in the Netherlands

Equine Herpesvirus (EHV) Myeloencephalopathy

Transcription:

INF10004 INFORCE 3: Safety demonstrated in three separate studies. Pfizer Animal Health Pfizer Inc. New York, NY 10017 July 2010 Summary USDA field safety study summary: 1 INFORCE 3 was administered intranasally to 0- to 8-day-old calves, weaned and high-stressed calves, and pregnant cows from all three trimesters. A total of 1,873 animals in three geographic locations and in several different categories (e.g., pregnant) were enrolled in the study, of which 1,253 were vaccinates and 620 were nonvaccinated controls. No local or systemic post-vaccination (within four hours of vaccination) adverse events were reported in any animal in the study. There were no adverse events directly related to INFORCE 3 vaccination under field conditions. Intense safety in young calves: 2 INFORCE 3 and a commercial 5-way intranasal vaccine were both administered intranasally using a 10X concentrated dose to 3- to 10-day old colostrum-deprived calves. In addition, a booster dose of a commercial vaccine was administered parenterally to all animals 14 days post-intranasal dose. INFORCE 3 was safe and did not induce any clinical disease, increased rectal temperature, viremia or leukopenia. High-risk stocker cattle study: 3 INFORCE 3 and a commercial 5-way intranasal vaccine were both administered intranasally to high-risk stocker calves on arrival to the feedlot. In addition, a booster dose of a commercial 5-way vaccine was administered parenterally to all calves 14 days post-intranasal dose. INFORCE 3 had fewer calves pulled for illness and fewer re-treated with antibiotics than the commercial 5-way intranasal vaccine. INFORCE 3 aids in the prevention of respiratory disease caused by IBR and PI 3 and prevents BRSV respiratory disease. Extensive safety studies were conducted with INFORCE 3, demonstrating complete safety in all ages and classes of animals, including newborn calves and high-stress stockers. Overview of the INFORCE 3 USDA field safety study The rigor and commitment to ensure the safety of INFORCE 3 went beyond the USDA regulations. In addition, during the development of INFORCE 3 it became apparent that a competitor had to issue a temporary stop sale

USDA requirements for field safety studies (FSS) are conducted in accordance with Veterinary Services Memorandum 800.204. FSS are evaluated under typical field husbandry conditions. The objective of such trials is to detect adverse events of unexpected type or frequency that might indicate the need for further investigation. More than one serial (batch or lot) of product must be tested and the product must represent the product that will be produced once it s licensed. Studies need to be conducted in multiple geographic regions; typically, three distinct regions of the United States (U.S.) are required with a minimum of 200 animals per region (600 in toto). The product must be tested under various conditions of husbandry and all types of animals (age, breed, sex, pregnancy and/or lactation status, and any other distinguishing features) that are to be included in label recommendations should be included. and distribution of its 5-way intranasal vaccine only six months post-launch to address a safety issue. It was required by the USDA to add the following warning statement to its label: Do NOT vaccinate high-stress stocker cattle or high-risk cattle on arrival. When designing the USDA required field safety study (FSS), Pfizer Animal Health decided to evaluate more than double the number of required animals (1,253 in toto) and ensured all ages and classes of animals were tested, including newborn calves and high-stress stockers. INFORCE 3 also was tested for safety in all stages of pregnancy (200 per trimester). The extent of the number and type of animals included in the FSS was strongly influenced by customer experiences with a recently approved intranasal vaccine. Study design Animal categories Table 1 USDA field safety study animals enrolled by category Category Location* Placebo Controls A total of 1,873 animals (1,485 females and 388 males) were enrolled in the study and included 1,402 Holsteins, one Holstein-cross and 470 beef breed cattle. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the animals enrolled by study location, animal category and the respective pregnancy trimester. A nonvaccinated control group was included for each animal category to provide an estimate of the current disease rate at each site. These rates supplemented the historic disease rates that the investigators observed at each site. INFORCE 3 PLS 1 INFORCE 3 PLS 2 Total Number Calves CA 54 53 53 160 (0- to 8-day-old) IN 54 53 53 160 CA 26 27 27 80 Calves (2 to 3 months) 68 IN 26 27 27 80 12 Calves CA 26 27 27 80 (6 to 12 months) IN 26 27 27 80 High-stress stockers MO 100 100 100 300 CA 151 134 150 435 Pregnant animals IN 101 121 106 328 MO 56 57 57 170 Total for all groups - 620 626 627 1873 - Sex *CA = California, IN = Indiana, MO = Missouri PLS = Prelicense Serial Table 2 USDA field safety study pregnant animals enrolled by trimester Treatment Group Location* Trimester 1 Trimester 2 Trimester 3 Total Placebo Control CA 55 27 69 151 INFORCE 3: PLS 1 CA 60 22 52 134 INFORCE 3: PLS 2 CA 61 24 65 150 Placebo Control IN 47 39 15 101 INFORCE 3: PLS 1 IN 44 50 27 121 INFORCE 3: PLS 2 IN 42 45 19 106 Placebo Control MO 2 36 18 56 INFORCE 3: PLS 1 MO 0 32 25 57 INFORCE 3: PLS 2 MO 1 37 19 57 Total for all groups - 312 312 309 933 Total Vaccinates/Trimester - 208 210 207 625 *CA = California, IN = Indiana, MO = Missouri PLS = Prelicense Serial 2

Table 3 USDA field safety study design Treatment Vaccine N T01 None or licensed parenteral vaccine 620 T02 INFORCE 3: PLS 1 626 T03 INFORCE 3: PLS 2 627 *Day 0 was staggered depending upon age group availability PLS = Prelicense Serial Approximate Study Days General Health Vaccination Dose Observation Day 0* 2 ml Day 0 through Day 28/29 Test vaccines Prelicense serials (PLS) are a requirement of the USDA and can be evaluated for safety under field conditions. INFORCE 3 PLS 1 and 2 were produced under routine manufacturing conditions and met all the requirements necessary for commercial released serials. Vaccination All vaccinated animals given either INFORCE 3 PLS 1 or 2 were vaccinated once intranasally with 2 ml using a cannula attached to a syringe. With the exception of the stocker calves in Missouri, which were vaccinated with 5 ml of a commercial vaccine, the placebo control animals received no other vaccine (Table 3). Post-vaccination observations Within four hours post-vaccination, all animals were observed by the investigator and any untoward local or systemic reactions were noted. In addition, for 28 days post-vaccination, all animals were observed daily for any clinical disease or adverse events, which were recorded and summarized by site, animal category, diagnosis and whether related to INFORCE 3. Any dead animals were necropsied and a likely cause of death was determined. Pregnant animals were monitored for abortion or parturition. Calves that were born during the study were observed for the duration of the study. Results USDA field safety study Within four hours after vaccination, no local or systemic reactions were observed in any animal. During the 28-day observation period, 101 of 620 controls (16.3%), 118 of 626 of the INFORCE 3 PLS 1 vaccinates (18.8%) and 105 of 627 INFORCE 3 PLS 2 vaccinates (16.7%) had an adverse event; however, none of these adverse events were determined to be related to INFORCE 3 by the investigators. Discussion USDA field safety study The rate of adverse events observed were consistent with expectations and were not directly related to administration of INFORCE 3. Adverse events that were unrelated to administration of INFORCE 3 were observed at all three sites and bore a unique association with the type of animal, site management protocols and the season when the study was conducted. The overall frequency of these adverse events was distributed evenly in the placebo controls and vaccinates. Adverse events included gastroenteritis, otitis media, bacterial conjunctivitis and Mannheimia haemolytica pleuropneumonia. Tissues from animals that died in all calf categories were negative for IBR, PI 3 and BRS viruses, and the investigators determined that the cause of these adverse events were not related to the test product. 3

Overview of additional safety studies with INFORCE 3 Intense safety study in young calves As previously discussed, during the development of INFORCE 3, it became apparent that a competitor had to issue a temporary stop sale and distribution of its 5-way intranasal vaccine only six months post-launch to address a safety issue. It was required by the USDA to add the following warning statement to its label: Do NOT vaccinate high-stress stocker cattle or highrisk cattle on arrival. Pfizer Animal Health s commitment to test and ensure the safety of INFORCE 3 prior to commercializing the product was demonstrated in two additional independent clinically controlled safety studies. The first of which is the Safety in Young Calves and is described below (Table 4). Animals Healthy colostrum-deprived Holstein calves were selected for this study. The calves were 3 to 10 days old at the time of vaccination and were sero-negative (serum neutralizing [SN] antibody titer of 1:4 for IBR, PI 3 and BVDV Types 1 and 2, and 1:8 for BRSV). The calves also were not persistently infected (PI) with bovine viral diarrhea virus. Study design Vaccine/vaccination The sentinel calves did not receive any vaccine. The INFORCE 3 and commercial 5-way vaccinated calves received vaccines that were reconstituted at the time of vaccination (Day 0) with liquid diluent to contain a 10X concentrated dose. On Study Day 14, all calves except sentinels received a 5-way MLV vaccine at the recommended dose by the subcutaneous route. Pertinent variables measured White blood cell counts EDTA blood was collected for determination of white blood cell (WBC) levels before and after IN vaccination to determine if either vaccine induced leukopenia. Leukopenia was defined as a post-vaccination drop of WBC counts of 40% of the baseline level. The baseline count was determined by averaging the individual counts for each calf on the three days prior to vaccination. Rectal temperatures and clinical observations Rectal temperatures were collected from Days -2 through 14 and clinical observations were recorded from Days -2 through 25. Fever was defined as any rectal temperature 103.3 F following vaccination. An animal Table 4 Study design Treatment # of Animals on Day 0 INFORCE 3 10 Formulation 10X concentration Intranasal Vaccination (Day 0) 2 ml Parenteral Vaccination (SC) (Day 14) 5-Way MLV vaccine Sentinels 3 - - - Commercial 5-way Intranasal 9 10X concentration 2 ml 5-Way MLV vaccine Sentinels 3 - - - 4

was considered to have clinical disease if it exhibited symptoms, including abnormal nasal discharge, abnormal respiration and/or lethargy. Necropsy On Days 7, 14 and 18, one calf from each group was euthanized and necropsied for determination of gross pathology and histopathology. At the end of the study, all remaining calves were euthanized and necropsy findings recorded. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was conducted on lung tissues for detection of IBR or BVD antigen. Masking All clinical observations and laboratory testing were conducted and recorded without the knowledge of treatment group assignment. Results Mild to moderate clinical disease as defined above was observed in five out of nine (55.6%) and fever in four out of nine (44.4%) commercial vaccine IN vaccinated calves while only one calf vaccinated with INFORCE 3 was clinically ill and no fever was recorded for calves vaccinated with INFORCE 3 (Table 5). Neither INFORCE 3 nor the commercial vaccine vaccinated calves developed leukopenia following IN vaccination. Gross pathology and histopathology results of all calves were either normal or mild, and not specific for any particular etiology. Tissues from only one calf were positive for BVDV antigen, a calf in the INFORCE 3 group that was necropsied at the end of the study. No tissues collected during the study were positive for IBR antigen. Discussion In this intense safety study in young calves, it appears that INFORCE 3 is safe. INFORCE 3 did not induce any clinical disease, increase rectal temperature or cause leukopenia. In contrast, the commercial 5-way intranasal vaccine induced clinical disease and fever. Table 5 Summary of leukopenia, clinical disease and fever Treatment N Leukopenia (40% drop) Mild to Moderate Clinical Disease Moderate Fever ( 103.3 F) INFORCE 3 10 0 1 0 Commercial 5-way Intranasal 9 0 5 4 Overview of the INFORCE 3 high-risk cattle safety study The third safety study conducted was designed to validate the safety of INFORCE 3 in highrisk cattle. The study was conducted according to a typical feedlot entry vaccination regimen as described below: Animals Healthy cross-bred beef heifers at 4 to 5 months of age and weighing approximately 400 pounds were obtained from multiple sources for this trial. At arrival, animals were allotted to treatment group and pen and received doramectin, ceftiofur crystalline free acid and ULTRABAC 8 per label directions. An ear notch sample also was collected to test for BVDV persistent infection (PI). Multiple animals of the same treatment were housed in the same pen, with three pens for each treatment (seven, seven and six animals per pen). The sentinel animals were housed in the pens with the animals that received no IN vaccine on arrival. Table 6 Study design IN Vaccine on Arrival (Day 0) Number of Animals SQ Vaccine (Day 14) None 20 Commercial 5-way MLV vaccine INFORCE 3 20 Commercial 5-way MLV vaccine Commercial 5-way Intranasal 20 Commercial 5-way MLV vaccine Sentinels 4 None 5

Study design Vaccine/vaccination The sentinel calves did not receive any vaccine (Table 6). The calves vaccinated with INFORCE 3 and the commercial vaccine received vaccines containing commercial release levels of all fractions. On Study Day 14, all calves except sentinels received a subcutaneous dose of the 5-way commercial MLV vaccine. Pertinent variables measured Clinical observations All animals were observed once daily for clinical signs of respiratory disease and overall health, and given a clinical score related to severity of disease according to the following criteria: No = Normal animal, no clinical signs. 1 = Nonspecific clinical signs. Clinical signs as a whole are not specific for acute viral infections by IBR, BRSV or BVDV. Clinical signs may include nasal discharge, abnormal respiration and mild lethargy. 2 = Acute clinical disease. Clinical signs as a whole are moderate in degree and specific for acute infection. Clinical signs may include nasal discharge, abnormal respiration, lethargy, gauntness, ocular discharge, hypersalivation, diarrhea, dehydration, lameness and/or reluctance to move. 3 = Severe clinical disease. Clinical signs as a whole are severe in degree and specific for acute IBR, BRSV or BVD infection. Clinical signs may include nasal discharge, abnormal respiration, lethargy, gauntness, ocular discharge, hypersalivation, diarrhea, excessive bruising, dehydration, recumbency, lameness and /or reluctance to move. Animals that are moribund or unable to reach food or water were euthanized. Rectal temperatures Rectal temperatures were only collected and recorded if an animal qualified to be pulled from the pen in order to check if it qualified for treatment. Concurrent treatments and samples Animals were not pulled (examined) for the first five days following the arrival dose of ceftiofur crystalline free acid. After the first five days, animals were pulled and received treatment if they met the following qualifications: 1. Animals that had a clinical score of 2 or greater 2. Pulled animals had rectal temperatures taken and those with temperatures 104.0 F qualified for treatment Animals that qualified for treatment received tulathromycin and were not pulled for 10 days. Those animals that re-qualified for treatment following tulathromycin were given danofloxacin mesylate and were not pulled for 48 hours. Animals could have received one additional dose of danofloxacin mesylate if they re-qualify for treatment following the first 48-hour period. If an animal re-qualified for treatment following 48 hours after the second dose of danofloxacin mesylate, the animal was humanely euthanized. If animals had < 104.0 F on examination, they were returned to the pen without treatment. All animals were returned to their pen of origin following examination and/or treatment unless they qualified for euthanasia. Samples collected As an animal qualified and received treatment for the first time, blood and nasal secretions were collected from the animal (first time only). Necropsy All animals that were found dead or euthanized were necropsied. On Day 28, animals that were considered to have respiratory disease or in poor health by the person scoring the animals were necropsied and assessed for gross lesions. Samples were collected from specific sites for histopathology, PCR (IBR, BVDV, PI 3 and BRSV) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results Forty-five percent (9 of 20) of the animals that received the commercial 5-way intranasal vaccine had a clinical disease score of 2 at some point during the study (Table 7). From those nine animals, five qualified for at least one extra treatment during the study and three animals were euthanized due to respiratory distress or poor health. With INFORCE 3, 15% (3 of 20) of animals had a clinical score of 2, two required treatment and one animal was found dead the day after the study was over. 6

Discussion The objective of this study was to determine if INFORCE 3 was safe for use in high-stress stocker cattle. The study was conducted in advance of the USDA field safety study and following the voluntary change to the product usage caution statement of a relatively new 5-way intranasal MLV vaccine. On arrival, vaccination with INFORCE 3 resulted in fewer pulls and treated animals compared with the group receiving the commercial 5-way intranasal vaccine. The necropsies performed on the four animals that were euthanized/died showed chronic respiratory disease. The one animal vaccinated with INFORCE 3 that died the day following the end of the study was included in the report in an attempt to obtain as much information as possible about vaccine safety. Tissue IHC was positive for IBR in three of four animals; however, no attempt was made to determine if the IBR was a wildtype or vaccine strain. A fresh sample of lung collected at necropsy was PCR negative for all five respiratory viruses. Due to the chronicity of disease in these animals, the exact cause of respiratory disease could not be determined. Following this study, the safety of INFORCE 3 in high-stress stocker cattle was further demonstrated in the USDA field safety study. INFORCE 3 does not have any product use caution statement relative to use in high-stress stocker cattle or high-risk cattle. Overall conclusions The outstanding data generated from these studies demonstrated the safety of INFORCE 3 in very young high-stress calves, weaned and high-stress stocker calves, and pregnant heifers and cows under field conditions. In addition, INFORCE 3 was found to be safe in both colostrum-deprived calves given a 10X concentrated dose and in high-risk stocker cattle vaccinated according to a typical feedlot entry vaccination regimen. Table 7 Summary of animals being pulled (examined) and treated for clinical disease and total number of dead animals by treatment group Initial Treatment N Pulled Treated Dead None 20 6 3 0 INFORCE 3 20 3 2 1* Commercial Vaccine 20 9 5 3 Sentinels 4 2 2 0 *Found dead after study was over 7

References 1. Data on file, Study Report No. 3437R-60-09-716, Pfizer Inc. 2. Data on file, Study Report No. 3131R-60-09-671, Pfizer Inc. 3. Data on file, Study Report No. 3131W-60-09-672, Pfizer Inc. All brands are the property of Pfizer Inc., its affiliates and/or its licensors. 2010 Pfizer Inc. All rights reserved. INF10004