The Inman Aligner. The Inman Aligner,* a versatile removable

Similar documents
The management of impacted

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

ORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS

Expansion/Arch Development

LEARN FROM A LEADER. Intensive, hands-on training that will prepare you to confidently fabricate the appliances you want.

Orthodontics (Ort) #910 Orthodontic Technique Lab Course Director: Dr. Brian Preston Instructor: Brian D. Willison CDT

Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; June 2014: Vol.-3, Issue- 3, P

RETENTION AND RELAPSE

rocky mountain orthodontics functionaleducation

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

6. Timing for orthodontic force

Lab Appliances & Services Pricing

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

THE MBT VERSATILE+ APPLIANCE SYSTEM

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

DENT Advanced Topics in Removable Prosthodontics, Winter 2008

Flip-Lock HERBST Appliance COMFORT. CUSTOMIZATION. ADVANCED ENGINEERING.

Enhanced Control in the Transverse Dimension using the Unitek MIA Quad Helix System by Dr. Sven G. Wiezorek

TransForce 2. Arch Developer Appliances Clinical Cases. New Horizons In Orthodontics

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

Deep bite can be corrected by intrusion of anterior

Mandibular Protraction Appliance IV

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction

LINGUAL STRAIGHTWIRE BRACKET SYSTEM Designed with Drs. Kyoto Takemoto and Giuseppe Scuzzo

Archwire Insertion and Disengagement Instruments Technique Guide

Orthodontic treatment for jaw defor. Sakamoto, T; Sakamoto, S; Harazaki, Author(s) Yamaguchi, H. Journal Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College, 4

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

Fixed Twin Blocks. Guidelines for case selection are similar to those for removable Twin Block appliances.

Arrangement of the artificial teeth:

Intensive, hands-on training that will prepare you to confidently fabricate the appliances you want.

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

Removable appliances

clinical orthodontics article

System Orthodontic Treatment Program By Dr. Richard McLaughlin, Dr. John Bennett and Dr. Hugo Trevisi

#39 Ortho-Tain, Inc

Delta Force. Bracket System. Putting you in the driver s seat for ultimate control

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

The Tip-Edge appliance and

Mixed Dentition Treatment and Habits Therapy

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

Lingual correction of a complex Class III malocclusion: Esthetic treatment without sacrificing quality results.

We Give Back. Reduce Emergency Visits! ATTACHMENTS. No More Poking Archwires! Crimpable Mini Stops. Tooth Tone Crimpable Mini Stops

DENT Advanced Topics in Removable Prosthodontics, Winter 2008

Crowding and protrusion treated by unusual extractions

wiirre e a a n n d d w wiirre e ffo orrms ms

Unless otherwise noted, the content of this course material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

MOLAR DISTALIZATION WITH MODIFIED GRAZ IMPLANT SUPPORTED PENDULUM SPRINGS. A CASE REPORT.

Low-Force Mechanics Nonextraction. Estimated treatment time months (Actual 15 mos 1 week). Low-force mechanics.

Intraoral molar-distalization appliances that

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD

CLASS II CORRECTION SIMPLIFIED

Treatment planning of nonskeletal problems. in preadolescent children

ORTHOdontics ORTHODONTIC LABORATORY

A SIMPLE METHOD FOR CORRECTION OF BUCCAL CROSSBITE OF MAXILLARY SECOND MOLAR

ortho case report Sagittal First international magazine of orthodontics By Dr. Luis Carrière Special Reprint

Case Report Unilateral Molar Distalization: A Nonextraction Therapy

Surveying. 3rd year / College of Dentistry/University of Baghdad ( ) Page 1

ISW for the treatment of adult anterior crossbite with severe crowding combined facial asymmetry case

Many orthodontists have discovered the utility

LINGUAL STRAIGHTWIRE BRACKET SYSTEM Designed with Drs. Kyoto Takemoto and Giuseppe Scuzzo

Invisalign technique in the treatment of adults with pre-restorative concerns

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

ACCELEDENT CASE REPORT. S. Jay Bowman, DMD, MSD Kalamazoo Orthodontics Portage, MI

S.H. Age: 15 Years 3 Months Diagnosis: Class I Nonextraction Severe crowding, very flat profile. Background:

ORTHODONTIC BANDING AND CEMENTATION. Materials

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

Orthodontic Treatment Using The Dental VTO And MBT System

Concepts of occlusion Balanced occlusion. Monoplane occlusion. Lingualized occlusion. Figure (10-1)

Class II. Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Clinician: Dr. Mike Mayhew, Boone, NC Patient: R.S. Cleft Lip and Palate.

TURN CLASS II INTO SIMPLE CLASS I PATIENTS.

Space Closure Biomechanics Applied Using The MBT System Technique

PRE-FINISHER APPLIANCE AND BONDABLE LINGUAL RETAINERS. tportho.com cosmeticbraces.com. POD_TPOC_09_PreFinisher_Retainers_2015, Rev.

Available online at International Journal of Current Research Vol. 10, Issue, 10, pp , October, 2018

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Corporate Medical Policy

Using the Lucia Jig to take an accurate & reliable centric relation bite registration

Molar anchorage loss has been shown to occur

One of the most common orthodontic A COMPARISON OF TWO MAXILLARY MOLAR DISTALIZING APPLIANCES WITH THE DISTAL JET

Splint Appliance. Selection Guide. Great Lakes. See inside...

DL 313 Removable Partial Dentures II

The following standards and procedures apply to the provision of orthodontic services for children in the Medicaid/NJ FamilyCare (NJFC) programs.

Indirect retainers. 1 i

From Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment

The Reinforced Removable Retainer

Volume 22 No. 14 September Dentists, Federally Qualified Health Centers and Health Maintenance Organizations For Action

An estimated 25-30% of all orthodontic patients can benefit from maxillary

Managing. Not on course. Unplanned reaction 9/15/2011. Possible Reactions. Probable Root causes. invisalign Aligner Tracking Issues

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Dual Force Cuspid Retractor

The Dynamax System: A New Orthopedic Appliance

TURN CLASS II INTO SIMPLE CLASS I PATIENTS.

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

eral Maxillary y Molar Distalization with Sliding Mechanics: Keles Slider

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

Anterior Open Bite Correction with Invisalign Anterior Extrusion and Posterior Intrusion.

Transcription:

S. JY OWMN, DMD, MSD The Inman ligner,* a versatile removable appliance, is a unique modification of the traditional spring retainer. It uses superelastic opencoil springs to create light and constant forces on both the labial and lingual surfaces of the anterior teeth. The appliance is designed to correct crowding, spacing, and rotations of the anterior teeth with force levels that can be adjusted to meet the requirements of each case. (Fig. 2). The distal ends of the labial bow should extend well beyond the buccal tubes (Fig. 3). superelastic coil spring and a small polycarbonate bead are slid onto each end of the labial bow, and a helix is bent into each end to push the bead mesially and thus compress the opencoil spring. The force generated by the spring ppliance Design and Fabrication The Inman ligner is constructed on a cast by making a wax setup of the teeth to be moved. The labial bow is embedded in clear acrylic (Fig. 1), and its distal ends are inserted into round tubes that have been soldered to the buccal sides of standard dams clasps, which are located on either the second premolars or the first molars *Designed and patented by Donal P. Inman, CDT. Distributed by Orthotech Orthodontic Laboratory, Inc., 9381 W. Sample Road, Suite 206, Coral Springs, FL 33065 and Great Lakes Orthodontics, Ltd., 199 Fire Tower Drive, Tonawanda, NY 14150. Fig. 1 Maxillary Inman ligner uses reciprocal forces to correct minor dental irregularities (photo courtesy of Great Lakes Orthodontics, Ltd.). Fig. 2 Mandibular Inman ligner.. Traditional acrylic lingual framework with soldered tube on dams clasp; spring-loaded distal wire produces retraction force for anterior teeth.. anded version with cantilever labial component and lingual spring-loaded tube/piston assembly. (Photos courtesy of Orthotech Orthodontic Laboratory, Inc.) 438 2003 JCO, Inc.

Dr. owman is an djunct ssociate Professor at St. Louis University and the straightwire instructor at the University of Michigan. He is in the private practice of orthodontics at 1314 W. Milham ve., Portage, MI 49024; e-mail: drjwyred@aol.com. moves the teeth distally. The appliance can be reactivated on one or both sides of the arch by rolling the terminal helix mesially with a birdbeak plier, thereby shortening the distal portion of the wire and further compressing the coil spring. The acrylic bead prevents the coil spring from sliding up the wire helix during reactivation. The lingual assembly of the Inman ligner consists of a U - or mushroom-shaped wire, embedded in the acrylic so that it contacts the lingual surfaces of the anterior teeth at midcrown (Fig. 4). Superelastic springs are slid onto both ends of this lingual wire; the ends are then inserted into two tubes, which are embedded in the main body of the retainer acrylic to lie parallel to the occlusal plane along either the palate or the lingual surfaces of the mandibular posterior teeth. The lingual assembly is thus springloaded to produce a constant mesial force against the lingual surfaces of the anterior teeth. Fig. 3 Reactivation by rolling terminal helix forward to compress coil spring. crylic ball prevents spring from sliding up helix. Fig. 4 Removable spring-loaded lingual assembly. Springs of various forces and lengths can be used to produce differential forces symmetrically or asymmetrically. VOLUME XXXVII NUMER 8 439

Modes of ction Superelastic coil springs from.009".030" to.012".030" can be selected for different applications. If only anterior crowding needs to be corrected, then.012".030" springs are standard for both the lingual and labial portions of the appliance (Fig. 5), which work together using opposing forces to move teeth. The Inman ligner s reciprocal action allows lighter and C Fig. 5. Poor compliance with traditional retention resulted in mandibular irregularity.. Mandibular Inman ligner used with clear acrylic maxillary retainer to recover and maintain orthodontic result. C. fter realignment and some interproximal reshaping. 440

owman more comfortable forces to be used than with more rigid aligners. This permits controlled movement of teeth over a greater distance without reactivation or replacement of the appliance. In contrast to more rigid aligners and retainers with finger springs, the Inman ligner is not prone to occlusal deflection and thus will always seat properly. For retraction of anterior teeth, as when closing residual extraction spaces, greater force is applied to the labial bow by using heavier springs or by rolling the terminal helices mesially, while reduced forces are applied lingually by using.009".030" or shortened coil springs, or by completely removing the lingual assembly, until the spaces are closed (Fig. 6). The lighter forces on the lingual allow the spaces to close, but help control tipping of the incisors. Thus, the Inman ligner is a useful alternative to retainers that use intraoral elastics, stretched from the molars to sectional wire hooks in the palatal acrylic, which tend to ride up the labial surfaces of the teeth, impinging on the gingival tissues, and to promote incisor tipping. If advancement of the anterior teeth is desired, as in anterior crossbite cases, the forces of the lingual assembly are increased by using heavier (.012".030") or longer coil springs, while the labial forces are reduced or eliminated by using lighter or shorter springs or unrolling the terminal helices, until correction is achieved. In the transitional dentition, a bonded version with no labial component and gentle.009".030" coil springs is recommended (Fig. 7). If the Inman ligner is used as a retainer after retraction or advancement, the equilibrium between the opposing labial and lingual forces should be reinstated to prevent unwanted changes. In some cases, a conventional retainer Fig. 6. Inman ligner fabricated with differential forces to retract lower anterior teeth.. Residual maxillary spaces closed using Inman ligner with lingual portion removed (different patient). fter space closure, lingual portion is replaced to maintain balance of forces on labial and lingual. Fig. 7 onded Inman ligner designed to advance maxillary incisors for resolution of anterior crossbite in transitional dentition. Posterior bite blocks are used to open anterior bite (photo courtesy of Orthotech Orthodontic Laboratory, Inc.). VOLUME XXXVII NUMER 8 441

Fig. 8 Midpalatal coffin spring may be incorporated into Inman ligner to produce limited maxillary expansion (photo courtesy of Orthotech Orthodontic Laboratory, Inc.). Fig. 9 Inman ligner with fixed bow, used when more lingual force and adjustment-free labial bow are required (photo courtesy of Orthotech Orthodontic Laboratory, Inc.). may be preferable for long-term stabilization. The Inman ligner can be modified to incorporate other features such as a coffin spring for maxillary expansion (Fig. 8), an invisible labial bow for esthetics, or a fixed, adjustmentfree labial bow for more lingual force (Fig. 9). It is also possible to produce differential forces on the right or left side of the arch by simply increasing or reducing the length or force of the springs on one side. 442