Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 2 Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, South San Francisco

Similar documents
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 2 Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, South San Francisco

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in ALL. Hagop Kantarjian M.D. May 2016 Bologna, Italy

Kevin Kelly, MD, Phd Acute Myeloid and Lymphoid Leukemias

LD-ARA-C and Clofarabine

On behalf of Study SGI Investigators Team

Characteristics, clinical outcome, and prognostic significance of IDH mutations in AML

Summary of Key AML Abstracts Presented at the European Hematology Association (EHA) June 22-25, 2017 Madrid, Spain

Background CPX-351. Lancet J, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl): Abstract 7035.

[ NASDAQ: MEIP ] Analyst & Investor Event December 8, 2014

Acute Myeloid Leukemia: State of the Art in 2018

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Progress at last

A Phase II Study of the Combination of Oral Rigosertib and Azacitidine in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Low Risk MDS Scoring System. Prognosis in Low Risk MDS. LR-PSS Validation 9/19/2012

The Changing Face of MDS: Advances in Treatment

Acute Leukemia From Precision Medicine to ImmunoRx

Cause of Death in Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

IDH1 AND IDH2 MUTATIONS

Oncology Highlights: Leukemia & Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Enasidenib Monotherapy is Effective and Well-Tolerated in Patients with Previously Untreated Mutant-IDH2 Acute Myeloid Leukemia

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Decitabine (Dacogen) for myelodysplastic syndrome. April 2008

Emerging Treatment Options for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Disrupting the Cell Cycle to Treat AML and MDS Rodman & Renshaw Conference

Therapeutic options after first line treatment failure

On Behalf of the SGI-110 Investigative Team

Published Ahead of Print on February 14, 2015, as doi: /haematol Copyright 2015 Ferrata Storti Foundation.

Disclosure. Study was sponsored by Karyopharm Therapeutics No financial relationships to disclose Other disclosures:

Treatment of Low-Blast Count AML. Maria Teresa Voso Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione Università di Roma Tor Vergata

Randomized phase 2 study of low-dose decitabine vs low-dose azacitidine in lower-risk MDS and MDS/MPN

Characteristics and Outcomes of Older Patients With Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia According to Treatment Approach

Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax Plus Low-Dose Cytarabine in Treatment-Naïve Patients Aged 65 Years With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Sunesis Pharmaceuticals Reports Third Quarter 2014 Financial Results and Recent Highlights

New concepts in the management of elderly patients with AML

New treatment strategies in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia van der Helm, Lidia Henrieke

AML in elderly. D.Selleslag AZ Sint-Jan Brugge, Belgium 14 December 2013

Disclosure Slide. Research Support: Onconova Therapeutics, Celgene

Overview. Myelodysplastic Syndromes: What s on the Horizon? Molecular Mutations in MDS. Refining Risk Models. Incorporating Mutational Data

Selinexor is an oral, slowly-reversible, first-inclass Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE)

Concomitant WT1 mutations predicted poor prognosis in CEBPA double-mutated acute myeloid leukemia

How the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia is Changing in 2019

Molecular Genetic Testing to Predict Response to Therapy in MDS

Treating Higher-Risk MDS. Case presentation. Defining higher risk MDS. IPSS WHO IPSS: WPSS MD Anderson PSS

The Evolving Treatment Landscape in AML

Summary of Key AML Abstracts Presented at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) December 2-6, San Diego CA

CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENT

Myelodysplastic syndromes post ASH Dominik Selleslag AZ Sint-Jan Brugge

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Specific Changes: Recommend the addition of sorafenib as an option for salvage therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3/ITD+ AML.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Post-ASH meeting 2014 Marie-Christiane Vekemans

Emerging Treatment Options for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

ANCO 2015: Treatment advances in acute leukemia

Acute Myeloid and Lymphoid Leukemias

TREATMENT UPDATES IN ACUTE LEUKEMIA. Shannon McCurdy, MD University of Pennsylvania

A phase 1b/2 study of vosaroxin in combination with cytarabine in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Highlights in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): what is going to change?

Evolving Targeted Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Presented at the 58 th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition, December 5, 2016, San Diego, CA

Bone marrow necrosis in acute leukemia: Clinical characteristic and outcome

Novel Induction and Targeted Strategies in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Risk-adapted therapy of AML in younger adults. Sergio Amadori Tor Vergata University Hospital Rome

Blast transformation in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Risk factors, genetic features, survival, and treatment outcome

ENASIDENIB IN MUTANT-IDH2 RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA (R/R AML): RESULTS OF A PHASE 1 DOSE- ESCALATION AND EXPANSION STUDY

Long-term outcome of acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans-retinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, and gemtuzumab

KEY WORDS: CRp, Platelet recovery, AML, MDS, Transplant

ESTABLISHED AND EMERGING THERAPIES FOR ACUTE MYELOID LEUKAEMIA. Dr Rob Sellar UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK

ANCO: ASCO Highlights 2018 Hematologic Malignancies

A. Personal Statement

New and Emerging Strategies in the Treatment of Patients with Higher risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

All patients with FLT3 mutant AML should receive midostaurin-based induction therapy. Not so fast!

Personalized Therapy in Adult Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia: Path to the Cure. Elias Jabbour M.D

Emerging Therapeutics in Hematologic Malignancies

Dr Shankara Paneesha. ASH Highlights Department of Haematology & Stem cell Transplantation

Treated secondary acute myeloid leukemia: a distinct high-risk subset of AML with adverse prognosis

MDS overview 전남대학교김여경

Molecularly Targeted Therapies - Strategies of the AMLSG

Personalized Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Patrick Stiff MD Loyola University Medical Center

Clinical Trials What are they?

American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA USA, 2 Dec 2018

Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management

La lenalidomide: meccanismo d azione e risultati terapeutici. F. Ferrara

IMMUNOMODULATORY ACTIVITY OF SGI-110, A SECOND GENERATION HYPOMETHYLATING AGENT

BL-8040: A Novel CXCR4 Antagonist

Acute myeloid leukemia: prognosis and treatment. Dimitri A. Breems, MD, PhD Internist-Hematoloog Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Campus Stuivenberg

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 2 City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; 3 Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; 4

Leucemia Mieloide Acuta Terapie Innovative. Adriano Venditti Ematologia Universita Tor Vergata, Roma

2 Workshop Nazionale SIES Ematologia Traslazionale Nuovi Farmaci e Strategie Terapeutiche nelle LMA

Meet-the-Expert: AML Treating older patients with AML

Targeting CD20 and CD22 in B-cell ALL Daniel J. DeAngelo, MD, PhD

Mayo Clinic Treatment Strategy in Essential Thrombocythemia, Polycythemia Vera and Myelofibrosis 2013 Update

Leukemia and subsequent solid tumors among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

Subset Specific Therapy in High Risk Myeloid Malignancies. Are We Making Progress? Olatoyosi Odenike, MD. The University of Chicago

Myelodysplastic syndromes Impact of Biology. Lionel Adès Hopital Saint Louis Groupe Francophone des SMD. Épidémiologie

ANCO Hematological Malignancies Update: The year in review. Midostaurin Vyxeos Gemtuzumab ozogamicin Enasidenib. The year in preview

5/21/2018. Disclosures. Objectives. Normal blood cells production. Bone marrow failure syndromes. Story of DNA

Outline. Case Study 5/17/2010. Treating Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Tapan M. Kadia, MD Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center

Ivosidenib (IVO; AG-120) in mutant IDH1 relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML): Results of a phase 1 study

CML: Living with a Chronic Disease

Emerging Treatment Options for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

The Past, Present, and Future of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

New drugs in Acute Leukemia. Cristina Papayannidis, MD, PhD University of Bologna

Transcription:

Phase I/II Study of Vosaroxin and Decitabine in Newly Diagnosed Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Naval Daver 1, Hagop Kantarjian 1, Guillermo Garcia-Manero 1, Elias Jabbour 1, Naveen Pemmaraju 1, Kenneth Vaughn 1, Sherry Pierce 1, Marina Konopleva 1, Tapan Kadia 1, Courtney DiNardo 1, Gautam Borthakur 1, Jorge Cortes 1, Adam Craig 2, and Farhad Ravandi 1 1 Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 2 Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, South San Francisco

Background Key Characteristics Targeted topoisomerase II inhibitor Active in anthracyclineresistant settings Evades common drug resistance pathways (Pgp) Lower potential for offtarget damage (cardiotoxicity) Quinolone Core H 3 C HN H 3 CO Vosaroxin O N N N S N CO 2 H Vosaroxin intercalates DNA and inhibits topoisomerase II, causing replicationdependent, site-selective DNA breaks, G2 arrest and cell death by apoptosis. Evanchi. Drug Metab Disp 2009; Hoch. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2009; Scaten. ibid 2010; Advani Clin Cancer Res 2010; Hawtin. PLoS One 2010; Hawtin. Oncotarget 2010; Haematologica 2011; Lancet Leukemia 2011.

Background Vosaroxin in newly dx pts with AML 60 yr (REVEAL-1): CR/CRp = 32%, Med survival = 7.0 mos, 30-day mortality = 12% Vosaroxin Plus Cytarabine Vs Placebo Plus Cytarabine in first relapse AML (VALOR, n=711) HiDAC HiDAC+V P-value CR/CRp 16% 30% <0.0001 Med OS 6.1 m 7.5 m P=0.06 Stratified P=0.02 OS 60 yr 5.0 m 7.1 m P=0.003 OS censoring for SCT 5.3 m 6.7 m P=0.02 60-day Mortality 19.4% 19.7% NS Stuart RK, et al. Br J Haematol. Nov 2014 Ravandi F, et al. Lancet Oncology Sept 2015

Inclusion Criteria Untreated AML ( 20% blasts) HR-MDS or HR-CMML ( 10% blasts) Therapy for prior MDS before progression to AML acceptable Age 60 years and unsuitable for standard induction* Adequate hepatic and renal function No uncontrolled infection *Kantarjian H, et al. Cancer. 2006.

Design Induction Reinduction (if needed) C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 Maintenance Decitabine Vosaroxin 70 90 mg/m 2 on Day 1 and 4 Decitabine 20 mg/m 2 IV daily x 5 days Max up to 7 cycles on protocol Cycles repeated every 4-6 weeks depending on count recovery and toxicity

Inclusion Criteria Phase I 6 pts received vosaroxin 90 mg/m 2 D1 and 4 No dose-limiting toxicities Phase II 16 pts received vosaroxin 90 mg/m 2 D1 and 4 - Grade 3 mucositis in 4 pts Subsequent 39 pts received vosaroxin 70 mg/m 2 D1 and 4

Characteristics (N=61) Characteristic Age Diagnosis Prior Rx for AHD Category 60-69 70 AML de novo 2 AML HR MDS de novo 2 MDS HMA agent Lenalidomide N (%); Median [range] 69 [60-78] 37 (61) 24 (39) 40 (66) 14 (23) 5 (8) 2 (3) 3 (5) 1 (2) BM blast % 36 [9-97] WBC 3.6 [0.4-57.0] Platelets 34 [7-333]

Characteristics (N=61) Characteristic N (%) Cytogenetics Molecular (N = 59) Diploid Miscellaneous -5/-7/complex Insufficient TP53 IDH2 IDH1 TET2 RAS (K/N) DNMT3A CEBPA ASXL1 JAK2 FLT3 EZH2 23 (38) 14 (23) 21 (34) 3 (5) 12 (20) 11 (18) 9 (15) 10 (16) 9 (15) 6 (10) 8 (13) 5 (8) 3 (5) 3 (5) 2 (3)

Response (N=61) Response / Outcome N (%) Evaluable 61 CR 32 (52) CRp 9 (15) CRi 4 (7) ORR (CR + CRp + CRi) 45 (74) No Response 8 (13) Early Death 4 wks 0 (0) Early Death 8 wks 8 (13) MRD (-) by multi-parameter flow 22 (67)

Response (N=61) Parameter Age Cytogenetics Mutation status Category 60-69 70 Diploid Miscellaneous -5/-7/Complex IDH2 TET2 TP53 RAS IDH1 Overall Response; N (%) 29/37 (78) 17/24 (71) 19/23 (83) 13/17 (76) 14/21 (67) 10/11 (91) 9/10 (90) 9/12 (75) 6 (67) 3/9 (33)

Response by Induction Dose (N=61) Induction dose Pts Deaths 8 wks Responders Need 1 course to response 90 mg/m 2 22 6 (27%) 16 (73%) 3/16 (19%) 70 mg/m 2 39 2 (5%) 30 (77%) 12/30 (40%)

Related toxicities(n=61) Toxicities G1/2 G3/4 Total (%) Bilirubin 33 8 41 (67) Diarrhea 2 0 2 (3) Mucositis 39 11 50 (82) Nausea/Vomiting 9 1 10 (16) Fungal infections 0 2 2 (3%) Major infections (pneumonia, sepsis) 0 34 34 (56%) Other infections 0 6 6 (10%)

Disposition (N=61) Parameter N (%); Med [Range] Median follow-up (mos) 7.7 [2.2-24.5] Median cycles to response 1 [1-4] Median cycles delivered 5 [1-7] Disposition Still on study Stem cell transplant Completed D+V (continue DAC alone) Completed D+V (on surveillance) Death < 8 weeks Primary refractory Relapse (16 relapse, 1 extramedullary) Death in CR 4 (7) 11 (19) 9 (16) 2 (3) 8 (14) 9 (16) 17 (29) 2 (3)

Vosaroxin+DAC in Newly Dx Older AML-MDS

OS by Age and Dose-level

OS (Censored for SCT)

OS by Karyotype

Vosaroxin + Decitabine vs Decitabine alone

Vosaroxin + Decitabine vs Decitabine Age 60-74

Vosaroxin + Decitabine vs Decitabine Age 75+

Conclusions Vosaroxin plus decitabine CR/CRi = 75%, 8 wk mortality = 13%. 70 mg/m2 well tolerated; better outcomes; 8 wk mortality 5%. Future Plan: MDACC: Vosaroxin+DAC alternating with Cladribine+LDAC:? vosaroxin 50/m2 vs 70/m2 Multicenter: Compare Vosaroxin+DAC vs HMA alone vs 3+7 in AML 60 yrs.