Low Risk Research Review Checklist

Similar documents
DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY. Checklist A Research Ethics Checklist for Investigations involving Human Participants

HSPC/IRB Description of Research Form (For research projects involving human participants)

Application for Ethical Approval of Research Proposals

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG Human Research Ethics Committee for Non-Clinical Faculties Application Form for Ethical Approval

RAWALPINDI MEDICAL COLLEGE, RAWALPINDI

Phone Numbers: (work) (cell/home) Phone Numbers: (work) (cell/home)

The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Survey and Behavioural Research Ethics

PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION TO USE HUMAN PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH

Melbourne IVF Human Research Ethics Committee. Guidelines for the Review of Quality Assurance, Negligible Risk & Low Risk Studies

TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE

RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN PARTICIPANTS EXPEDITED/FULL APPLICATION

The University of Queensland Guidelines for Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans

MINOR CLIENT HISTORY

Human Ethics Policy - Research Involving Human Participants v Page 1 of 16

Type of Review Requested:

SALISBURY UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESEARCH APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

Last Name First name Academic degrees. Professional titles and/or work position within your home institution

Please take time to read this document carefully. It forms part of the agreement between you and your counsellor and Insight Counselling.

Medical gap arrangements - practitioner application

CLIENT HISTORY CLIENT LEGAL NAME: CLIENT PREFERRED NAME:

2. Definition of Research. 3. When Is Ethics Approval Required? 4. SAE EU Scholarship and Research Ethics Committee Membership. 4.2.

Patient Questionnaire. Name: Date: A. What are the main concerns or problems that brought you here today?

Demographic Information Form

Institutional Review Board Application

December Vulnerable Young People Risk Management Procedure

MDCH IRB REVIEW APPLICATION Authority: Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46

PROCEDURE Mental Capacity Act. Number: E 0503 Date Published: 20 January 2016

IRB GRAND ROUNDS SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH: NEED TO KNOW

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH AT ORANGE COAST COLLEGE

School of Natural Sciences ethics application process. Dr. Jane Stout Chairperson of the SNS Research Ethics Committee October 2015

IRB EXPEDITED REVIEW

SMART Wokingham Young persons Screening and Referral Form

Gymnasium Sign In/Sign Out Sheet. Please sign in before commencing your workout

Hull and East Riding CAMHS Professional Referral Form

CAPE PENINSULA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY HEALTH AND WELLNESS SCIENCES RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE

Demographic Information Form

The Impact of the Opioid Crisis on Children

Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facility Referral

Professional Doctorate in Counselling Psychology

Nova Scotia Board of Examiners in Psychology. Custody and Access Evaluation Guidelines

Hong Kong Psychological Society Division of Counselling Psychology (DCoP) Application Form for Membership

RESEARCH ETHICS POLICY AND PRACTICE AT LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY

One year, many women Taking it to the community: talking health with Victorian women

RESEARCH ETHICS PROCEDURES

AWARD CATEGORIES GUIDELINES

Using the NWD Integrative Screener as a Data Collection Tool Agency-Level Aggregate Workbook

GeMS Young Adult Self-Report Questionnaire

COLLEGE OF SCIENCE, HEALTH AND ENGINEERING DOMESTIC APPLICANTS ONLY

HASI Orana and Western NSW Application and Referral Form

Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey (APMS) 2014 Part of a national Mental Health Survey Programme

Internship Application Form

FORM 3: ATTENTION DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER VERIFICATION

Risk Assessment. Person Demographic Information. Record the date of admission.

Office of Research Compliance. Research Involving Human Subjects

Evidence-Based Practice Fidelity Site Visit Tools

Client s Name: Today s Date: Partner s Name (if being seen as a couple): Address, City, State, Zip: Home phone: Work phone: Cell phone:

Provider Training. Behavioral Health Screening, Referral, and Coding Requirements

Due Process Hearing Request Information Sheet and Model Form

IRB policy and procedures 1. Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College

JILL L. KOFENDER, PHD, PLLC. Licensed Clinical Psychologist ADULT CLIENT QUESTIONNAIRE. Client s Name Today s Date Gender Age Birthdate

Self-Evaluation and Attestation

Sofia P. Simotas, Ph.D., PLLC 2524 Nottingham St. Houston, Texas 77005

Last Name First Middle Date of Birth Age. Residence Address City State Zip Code

ADULT INTAKE QUESTIONNAIRE. Ok to leave message? Yes No. Present psychological difficulties please check any that apply to you at this time.

APPLICATION FORM TO BE COMPLETED, PRINTED OUT, SIGNED WHERE APPROPRIATE, SCANNED, AND SENT AS ATTACHMENT TO:

APPLICATION/RESEARCH PROTOCOL REVIEW FORM

The AAA statement on Ethnography and Institutional Review Boards (2004) provides a useful working definition:

MC IRB Protocol No.:

COAHOMA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Application for Interim Superintendent of Schools

Full Circle Psychotherapy: Ayla Marie Carter, MA, LMHC

Guidance on Benign Behavioral Interventions: Exempt Category Three 45 CFR (d)(3)(i)

Postgraduate Research Experience 2012 A report on the experience of recent higher degree research graduates

Georgia Office of Dispute Resolution

Protecting Human Subjects In Social-Behavioral-Educational Research:

When Life Gets in the Way of Living COUNSELLING CLIENT INFORMATION SHEET

Welcome to Psychological Assessment Services, LLC. Referral Packet

Child s name: Nickname: Date of Birth: / / Sex: Male Female SSN: Today s date: / / Parent s Name #1: Home phone: ( ) Cell: ( )

POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH EXPERIENCE A Report of the Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire

Monmouth University. V. Workers Assessment (See Appendix)- Only for MSW Second Year CPFC Students

Name: Birthdate: Gender: Address: Phone: (Home) (Work) (Cell) Highest Education Attended: Occupation: Place of Employment:

Conduct priority and volume investigations (CI101) OCR unit number: 500/8021/0 Level: 3 Credit value: 5 Guided learning hours: 50

WHAT IS THE DISSERTATION?

Level 2 Award in Understanding Alcohol Misuse

Loss and grief. Unit standard Version Level Credits

Youth Justice National Development Team. Youth Justice National Development Team Annual Report. Fiona Dyer

ASWB LMSW Exam. Volume: 261 Questions

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRPORT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RULES OF PROCEDURE

Address: City/State/Zip: Home Phone: Cell: Pager: Work Phone: Employer/School: Emergency Contact: Phone:

Journey to Truth Counseling

MERLE MULLINS COUNSELING REGISTRATION FORM (Please Print) CLIENT INFORMATION

Q5 If there is more than one faculty researcher, then enter co-researchers information (Name, address)

Personal Disclosure Statement and Notice of Practices

APPLICATION TO INVOLVE HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH (Form IAUPRIRB-1)

Certificate IV in Mental Health Peer Work CHC43515 Scholarships Application Form

I AA P The Indiana Association for Addiction Professionals

What is the Dissertation?

PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS

Flexibility and Informed Consent Process

Summary of Changes to Human Subjects Regulations: Effective January 21, 2019

Student Guide To Ethics Review For Research Involving Human Subjects

Transcription:

FORM 2 HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE Low Risk Research Review Checklist Please complete the checklist below to ascertain whether your research project would be eligible to be submitted to your Faculty Human Research Committee (FHEC) for ethical review as a low risk research. Student researchers must review the completed checklist with their supervisors. If you answer to any items in the checklist your project would normally not be eligible for submission to the appropriate Faculty Human Ethics Committee for review (unless you can make a special case refer section 6) and you should complete an ethics application form NEAF and email it to ethics@csu.edu.au for review by the Human Research Ethics Committee. Please note LOW RISK research can be defined as where the foreseeable risk to participants is no more than one of discomfort. For example: questionnaires and/or surveys, anonymous or otherwise, online etc. involving non-sensitive topics observations, with or without consent For more information, refer to the National Statement on ethical conduct in human research 2007 Chapter 2.1: Risk and Benefit. Timing constraints are not an acceptable reason for seeking expedited review through this process where projects are of more than everyday risk. PROJECT TITLE CHIEF INVESTIGATOR Name (Title/ given name / family name) Qualifications Student No(if applicable) Email address: SUPERVISOR Name (Title/given name / family name) Qualifications School/Research Centre/ External Organisation (of Chief Investigator or supervisor) Level of Study (eg Undergraduate practicum/clinical research project, Honours research project, postgraduate Masters or PhD) Course Subject Title and Code Brief outline of the project (2 lines) LRRC Version 7 1

FORM 2 1. EXTERNAL REQUIREMENTS Is the research being funded by an agency outside the University, which requires Human Research Ethics Committee approval involving community representation? [If you have answered to this question you must forward the CSU ethics application form to the Human Research Ethics Committee] Is the project hosted/auspiced by an organisation other than CSU If you have answered No proceed to point 2. Risk Assessment Is the project seen as being owned primarily by the Organisation or CSU If the organisation provide: Name of host organisation Brief outline of the project (2 lines) Approval process followed including committees/position of person(s) approving the proposal Agreement about Intellectual Property of researcher and organisation 2. WAIVER OF CONSENT Will personal information in medical research, or personal information be accessed without first gaining consent from the individual to access this information? If yes is ticked STOP completing this form. Your NEAF application MUST BE SUBMITTED TO the University Human Research Ethics Committee addressing section 2.3.9 of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research Only a fully constituted HREC may grant waiver of consent for research using personal information in medical research, or personal health information. Other review bodies may grant waiver of consent for other research. Refer section 2.3.9 of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e72_national_statement_march_20 14_141126.pdf 3. RISK ASSESSMENT A. Are any of the following topics to be covered in part or in whole? research involving children and young people research about parenting research investigating sensitive personal issues research investigating sensitive cultural issues explorations of grief, death or serious/traumatic loss depression, mood states, anxiety gambling LRRC Version 7 2

eating disorders illicit drug taking substance abuse self report of criminal behaviour any psychological disorder suicide gender identity sexuality race or ethnic identity any disease or health problem fertility termination of pregnancy anger management impulse control self esteem domestic violence elderly neglect divorce adults abused as children participant(s) being asked to provide information on another person any similar topic of possible concern use of researcher devised questionnaire researching a sensitive topic (eg.. depression) FORM 2 B. Are any of the following procedures to be employed? use of personal data obtained from organisations (including Commonwealth or State Government Department/Agency) deception of participants concealing the purposes of the research covert observation audio or visual recording without consent recruitment via a third party or agency withholding from one group specific treatments or methods of learning, from which they may benefit (e.g., in medicine or teaching) any psychological interventions or treatments LRRC Version 7 3

administration of physical stimulation invasive physical procedures infliction of pain administration of drugs administration of other substances administration of ionising radiation tissue sampling or blood taking collecting body fluid genetic testing/dna extraction use of medical records where participants can be identified or linked drug trials and other clinical trials administration of drugs or placebos potentially humiliating tasks any other similar procedures FORM 2 C. Other Risks Are there any risks to the researcher, (e.g. research undertaken in unsafe, isolated environments or trouble spots)? 4. PARTICIPANT VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Does the research specifically target participants from any of the following groups? suffering a psychological disorder suffering a physical vulnerability people highly dependent on medical care minors without parental or guardian consent people whose ability to give consent is impaired residents of a custodial institution unable to give free informed consent because of difficulties in understanding information statement (eg language difficulties) members of a socially identifiable group with special cultural or religious needs or political vulnerabilities those in dependent relationship with the researchers (eg lecturer/student, doctor/patient, teacher/pupil, professional/client) those in a social/personal relationship (eg friendship) with the researcher/s participants able to be identified in any final report when specific consent for this has not been given LRRC Version 7 4

Indigenous Australians small sample size which may lead to participant identification in final report any similar vulnerability concerns FORM 2 5. RESEARCH LOCATION ASSESSMENT Location of interviews: interviews being conducted in participant s home interviews being conducted in an isolated area any other similar concerns 6. RESEARCH IN OVERSEAS SETTINGS ASSESSMENT Does the research involve any of the following: research being undertaken in a politically unstable area research involving sensitive cultural issues research in countries where criticism of government and institutions might put participants and/or researchers at risk 7. SPECIAL CASE ASSESSMENT If you have answered to an item in the checklist but you still believe that because of the particular nature of the project and the participants your project may still be eligible for expedited review. Please provide details below, or attach an additional sheet. You must then submit these reasons with the checklist to your Faculty Human Ethics Committee (FHEC) for consideration and approval of your special case. SPECIAL CASE DETAILS: RESEARCHER SIGNATURE: SUPERVISOR S SIGNATURE (if applicable) LRRC Version 7 5

FORM 2 APPROVAL BY FHEC OF SPECIAL CASE The FHEC has met and considered the special case details associated with this project and agree / do not agree that the project can be submitted to the Faculty Human Ethics Committee for review. Other comments: FHEC CHAIR SIGNATURE: If you have answered to all items, attach this checklist to your completed NEAF and submit to your Faculty Human Ethics Committee (FHEC). Please note the FHEC may forward your application onto the HREC for review if they deem your research not to be low risk. If you have answered to one item or more and are T requesting a special case email your completed NEAF to ethics@csu.edu for review by the full Human Research Ethics Committee. LRRC Version 7 6