Chapter 25. Paired Samples and Blocks. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.

Similar documents
Chapter 23. Inference About Means. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 19. Confidence Intervals for Proportions. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 19. Confidence Intervals for Proportions. Copyright 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc.

Comparison of two means

STA Learning Objectives. What is Population Proportion? Module 7 Confidence Intervals for Proportions

STA Module 7 Confidence Intervals for Proportions

Previously, when making inferences about the population mean,, we were assuming the following simple conditions:

EPS 625 INTERMEDIATE STATISTICS TWO-WAY ANOVA IN-CLASS EXAMPLE (FLEXIBILITY)

STA Module 9 Confidence Intervals for One Population Mean

The Confidence Interval. Finally, we can start making decisions!

Reflection Questions for Math 58B

CHAPTER OBJECTIVES - STUDENTS SHOULD BE ABLE TO:

Examining differences between two sets of scores

appstats26.notebook April 17, 2015

YSU Students. STATS 3743 Dr. Huang-Hwa Andy Chang Term Project 2 May 2002

Chapter 18 Repeated-Measures Analysis of Variance Cont.

An Introduction to Bayesian Statistics

Research Methods in Forest Sciences: Learning Diary. Yoko Lu December Research process

Identify two variables. Classify them as explanatory or response and quantitative or explanatory.

Confidence Intervals On Subsets May Be Misleading

The t-test: Answers the question: is the difference between the two conditions in my experiment "real" or due to chance?

10. LINEAR REGRESSION AND CORRELATION

Missy Wittenzellner Big Brother Big Sister Project

Appendix B Statistical Methods

Inferential Statistics

Doing Thousands of Hypothesis Tests at the Same Time. Bradley Efron Stanford University

Unit 1 Exploring and Understanding Data

Chapter 13. Experiments and Observational Studies. Copyright 2012, 2008, 2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Research Designs. Inferential Statistics. Two Samples from Two Distinct Populations. Sampling Error (Figure 11.2) Sampling Error

What Solution-Focused Coaches Do: An Empirical Test of an Operationalization of Solution-Focused Coach Behaviors

Understandable Statistics

Choosing a Significance Test. Student Resource Sheet

Quality Digest Daily, March 3, 2014 Manuscript 266. Statistics and SPC. Two things sharing a common name can still be different. Donald J.

The Pretest! Pretest! Pretest! Assignment (Example 2)

Objectives. Quantifying the quality of hypothesis tests. Type I and II errors. Power of a test. Cautions about significance tests

Kidane Tesfu Habtemariam, MASTAT, Principle of Stat Data Analysis Project work

HS Exam 1 -- March 9, 2006

Tutorial 3: MANOVA. Pekka Malo 30E00500 Quantitative Empirical Research Spring 2016

CHAPTER ONE CORRELATION

Psychology Research Process

Carrying out an Empirical Project

Chapter 10: Moderation, mediation and more regression

Practical Statistical Reasoning in Clinical Trials

Relationships. Between Measurements Variables. Chapter 10. Copyright 2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc.

Hypothesis Testing. Richard S. Balkin, Ph.D., LPC-S, NCC

Before we get started:

LAB ASSIGNMENT 4 INFERENCES FOR NUMERICAL DATA. Comparison of Cancer Survival*

Comparing multiple proportions

Applied Statistical Analysis EDUC 6050 Week 4

8/28/2017. If the experiment is successful, then the model will explain more variance than it can t SS M will be greater than SS R

Pitfalls in Linear Regression Analysis

Psychology Research Process

USE AND MISUSE OF MIXED MODEL ANALYSIS VARIANCE IN ECOLOGICAL STUDIES1

CHAPTER THIRTEEN. Data Analysis and Interpretation: Part II.Tests of Statistical Significance and the Analysis Story CHAPTER OUTLINE

Sheila Barron Statistics Outreach Center 2/8/2011

Confidence Intervals and Sampling Design. Lecture Notes VI

Introduction to SPSS. Katie Handwerger Why n How February 19, 2009

Chapter 5: Field experimental designs in agriculture

Evaluating you relationships

Profile Analysis. Intro and Assumptions Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth

2.75: 84% 2.5: 80% 2.25: 78% 2: 74% 1.75: 70% 1.5: 66% 1.25: 64% 1.0: 60% 0.5: 50% 0.25: 25% 0: 0%

MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION 24.1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES

Student Performance Q&A:

***SECTION 10.1*** Confidence Intervals: The Basics

Stepwise method Modern Model Selection Methods Quantile-Quantile plot and tests for normality

Designing Psychology Experiments: Data Analysis and Presentation

Common Statistical Issues in Biomedical Research

Quantitative Methods in Computing Education Research (A brief overview tips and techniques)

A Brief Introduction to Bayesian Statistics

Survival Skills for Researchers. Study Design

Knowledge discovery tools 381

Use Survey Happiness Complete. SAV file on Blackboard Assigned to Mistake 8

Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 93, No. 2 (Apr., 1985)

Lecture 16. DATA 8 Spring Assessing Models. Slides created by John DeNero and Ani Adhikari

Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence

04/12/2014. Research Methods in Psychology. Chapter 6: Independent Groups Designs. What is your ideas? Testing

Problem #1 Neurological signs and symptoms of ciguatera poisoning as the start of treatment and 2.5 hours after treatment with mannitol.

Bill Wilson & The 12 Steps Steve H. Johnson City, Tennessee

1) What is the independent variable? What is our Dependent Variable?

Data and Statistics 101: Key Concepts in the Collection, Analysis, and Application of Child Welfare Data

Chapter 1: Explaining Behavior

Chapter 19: Categorical outcomes: chi-square and loglinear analysis

AP Stats Chap 27 Inferences for Regression

Analysis of Environmental Data Conceptual Foundations: En viro n m e n tal Data

Power-Based Connectivity. JL Sanguinetti

(C) Jamalludin Ab Rahman

Other Designs. What Aids Our Causal Arguments? Time Designs Cohort. Time Designs Cross-Sectional

What you should know before you collect data. BAE 815 (Fall 2017) Dr. Zifei Liu

Knowledge is Power: The Basics of SAS Proc Power

SPRING GROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT. Course Description. Instructional Strategies, Learning Practices, Activities, and Experiences.

Chapter 3A. Selecting a Problem and Reviewing the Research Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind. 1

V. Gathering and Exploring Data

A Case Study: Two-sample categorical data

Making Inferences from Experiments

CHAPTER - 6 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. This chapter discusses inferential statistics, which use sample data to

Political Science 15, Winter 2014 Final Review

Daniel Boduszek University of Huddersfield

One-Way Independent ANOVA

A Brief (very brief) Overview of Biostatistics. Jody Kreiman, PhD Bureau of Glottal Affairs

Assessing Agreement Between Methods Of Clinical Measurement

Transcription:

Chapter 25 Paired Samples and Blocks Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.

Paired Data Data are paired when the observations are collected in pairs or the observations in one group are naturally related to observations in the other group. Paired data arise in a number of ways. Perhaps the most common is to compare subjects with themselves before and after a treatment. When pairs arise from an experiment, the pairing is a type of blocking. When they arise from an observational study, it is a form of matching. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 25-3

Paired Data (cont.) If you know the data are paired, you can (and must!) take advantage of it. To decide if the data are paired, consider how they were collected and what they mean (check the W s). There is no test to determine whether the data are paired. Once we know the data are paired, we can examine the pairwise differences. Because it is the differences we care about, we treat them as if they were the data and ignore the original two sets of data. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 25-4

Paired Data (cont.) Now that we have only one set of data to consider, we can return to the simple one-sample t-test. Mechanically, a paired t-test is just a one-sample t-test for the means of the pairwise differences. The sample size is the number of pairs. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 25-5

Assumptions and Conditions Paired Data Assumption: Paired data Assumption: The data must be paired. Independence Assumption: Independence Assumption: The differences must be independent of each other. Randomization Condition: Randomness can arise in many ways. What we want to know usually focuses our attention on where the randomness should be. 10% Condition: When a sample is obviously small, we may not explicitly check this condition. Normal Population Assumption: We need to assume that the population of differences follows a Normal model. Nearly Normal Condition: Check this with a histogram or Normal probability plot of the differences. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 25-6

The Paired t-test When the conditions are met, we are ready to test whether the paired differences differ significantly from zero. We test the hypothesis H 0 : d = 0, where the d s are the pairwise differences and 0 is almost always 0. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 25-7

The Paired t-test (cont.) We use the statistic n 1 where n is the number of pairs. t 0 s d SE d is the ordinary standard error for the n mean applied to the differences. When the conditions are met and the null hypothesis is true, this statistic follows a Student s t-model on n 1 degrees of freedom, so we can use that model to obtain a P-value. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 25-8 d SE d

Confidence Intervals for Matched Pairs When the conditions are met, we are ready to find the confidence interval for the mean of the paired differences. The confidence interval is n 1 where the standard error of the mean difference is s d SE d n The critical value t* depends on the particular confidence level, C, that you specify and on the degrees of freedom, n 1, which is based on the number of pairs, n. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 25-9 d t SE d

Blocking Consider estimating the mean difference in age between husbands and wives. The following display is worthless. It does no good to compare all the wives as a group with all the husbands we care about the paired differences. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 25-10

Blocking (cont.) In this case, we have paired data each husband is paired with his respective wife. The display we are interested in is the difference in ages: Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 25-11

Blocking (cont.) Pairing removes the extra variation that we saw in the side-by-side boxplots and allows us to concentrate on the variation associated with the difference in age for each pair. A paired design is an example of blocking. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 25-12

What Can Go Wrong? Don t use a two-sample t-test for paired data. Don t use a paired-t method when the samples aren t paired. Don t forget outliers the outliers we care about now are in the differences. Don t look for the difference between means of paired groups with side-by-side boxplots. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 25-13

What have we learned? Pairing can be a very effective strategy. Because pairing can help control variability between individual subjects, paired methods are usually more powerful than methods that compare independent groups. Analyzing data from matched pairs requires different inference procedures. Paired t-methods look at pairwise differences. We test hypotheses and generate confidence intervals based on these differences. We learned to Think about the design of the study that collected the data before we proceed with inference. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 25-14