Experience with Pyrazinamide and Rifampin Regimens for Latent TB Infection

Similar documents
Weekly. August 8, 2003 / 52(31);

Mortality Slide Series. National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention

Chapter 5 Treatment for Latent Tuberculosis Infection

The authors assessed drug susceptibility patterns

6/2/2014. TB among Persons Experiencing Homelessness DEFINING THE PROBLEM. Overview. Sapna Bamrah Morris, MD

For more information, contact

Clinical and Behavioral Characteristics of HIV-infected Young Adults in Care in the United States

5. HIV-positive individuals treated with INH should receive Pyridoxine (B6) 25 mg daily or 50 mg twice/thrice weekly on the same schedule as INH

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

Trends in Testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex from US Public Health Laboratories,

U.S. Counties Vulnerability to Rapid Dissemination of HIV/HCV Infections Among People Who Inject Drugs

Diagnosis and Treatment of Tuberculosis, 2011

TB in Corrections Phoenix, Arizona

The Role of Rifampin for the Treatment of Latent TB Infection. Introduction. Introduction

Tuberculosis Epidemiology

CDC s Approach to Fast Track Laboratory Diagnosis for Persons at Risk of Drug Resistant TB: Molecular Detection of Drug Resistance (MDDR) Service

Laboratory s Role in the Battle Against Drug Resistant Tuberculosis

Introduction to TB Nurse Case Management Online February 4, 11, 18 and 25, 2015

CDC Strategies for Protecting Older Americans

Sharing the Care: Working Together on LTBI Treatment and Management Webinar. September 24, Curry International Tuberculosis Center

Vibrio surveillance in the CIDT Era

Breakout Session C2 Christine Ho April 21, 2017

HEALTH SERVICES POLICY & PROCEDURE MANUAL

Decreasing tuberculosis morbidity in the United

Epidemiological Methods in TB

TB in Prisons and Jails Albuquerque, New Mexico November 28, 2012

Placing the United States on the Path Toward the Elimination of Hepatitis C as a Public Health Threat

Communicable Disease Control Manual Chapter 4: Tuberculosis. Assessment and Follow-Up of TB Contacts

Enhanced Comprehensive HIV Prevention Planning (ECHPP) Project Overview

National Chlamydia Update

TB Outbreak in a Homeless Shelter

State Of Tuberculosis Elimination in the United States, 2017

Drug Interactions Lisa Armitige, MD, PhD November 17, 2010

Outbreak of Salmonella Newport Infections Linked to Cucumbers United States, 2014

Disclosures. Public Health Motivation 6/6/2012. The 12-Dose INH-Rifapentine Once-Weekly DOT Regimen: What Next?

The State of Asthma. Jeanne Moorman, NCEH Survey Statistician National Asthma Program

NTNC Membership Opportunities NTNC MEMBERSHIP DRIVE WEBINAR. Juggling TB and Alcoholism. Nurse Case Management of the TB Patient April 14, 2016

HIV Testing. Susan Tusher, LMSW Program Coordinator The Kansas AIDS Education and Training Center

Pre-Treatment Evaluation. Treatment of Latent TB Infection (LTBI) Initiating Treatment: Patient Education. Before initiating treatment for LTBI:

Using Cancer Registry Data for Post Marketing Surveillance of Rare Cancers

Tuberculosis Exposure, Infection, and Disease Among Children with Medical Comorbidities

Hepatitis B Epidemiology and Prevention in the Elimination Era John W. Ward, MD

5/2/2016. Dr Brooks has no relevant financial affiliations to disclose. (Update 04/15/16) Learning Objectives

Update of the CDC/HICPAC Guideline: Infection Prevention in Healthcare Personnel

LTBI Videos-Treatment

New TB Medications. National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention

Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) Questions and Answers for Health Care Providers

CDC Programmatic Activities in Breast and Ovarian Cancer Genomics

National Xpert MTB/RIF Programme

TB Grand Rounds. Reynard McDonald, MD & Henry Fraimow, MD January 30, Outline

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement: Screening for Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) in Adults

Review of Influenza Activity in San Diego County

CDC Division of Oral Health Federal Agency Panel

10/3/2017. Updates in Tuberculosis. Global Tuberculosis, WHO 2015 report. Objectives. Disclosures. I have nothing to disclose

Quit Rates of New York State Smokers

Assessment of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions in Response to an Outbreak of Typhoid Fever in Neno District, Malawi

County of San Diego HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

Ruth Moro M.D., M.P.H. Medical Epidemiologist. CDC, Division of Tuberculosis Elimination Clinical Research Branch Tuberculosis Trials Consortium

Scott Lindquist MD MPH Tuberculosis Medical Consultant Washington State DOH and Kitsap County Health Officer

Council for Outbreak Response: Healthcare-Associated Infections & Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens (CORHA) HICPAC December 1, 2016

Anri Uys (MSc Pharmacology, BPharm NWU) Medicines Information Centre, Division of Clinical Pharmacology University of Cape Town

Influenza Surveillance in the United St ates

Latent TB Infection Treatment

Enhancement of Treatment Completion for Latent Tuberculosis Infection With 4 Months of Rifampin*

Assessing Change with IIS. Steve Robison Oregon Immunization Program

Flu Watch. MMWR Week 3: January 14 to January 20, and Deaths. Virologic Surveillance. Influenza-Like Illness Surveillance

Pediatric Tuberculosis Lisa Y. Armitige, MD, PhD September 14, 2017

Hepatitis C in Massachusetts Epidemiology and Public Health Response

Detecting HIV transmission clusters to better prioritize prevention efforts

Interstate Variation in Prescribing of Opioid Pain Relievers and Benzodiazepines Karin A. Mack, PhD Associate Director for Science

Moving Past the Basics of Tuberculosis Phoenix, Arizona May 8-10, 2012

Adult Immunizations. Business Health Care Group (BHCG) April 25, Cathy Edwards. Immunization Program Advisor

Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention

Thyroid cancer in the United States: Recent increases

TB BASICS: PRIORITIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS

Flu Watch. MMWR Week 4: January 21 to January 27, and Deaths. Virologic Surveillance. Influenza-Like Illness Surveillance

Treatment of Latent TB Infection (LTBI)

Setting the Context: Understanding the Numbers, Vulnerable Populations and Federal Public Health Policy

July 13, 1990 / 39(RR-10);7-20

Expanding Latent Tuberculosis Infection Testing and Treatment to Accelerate Tuberculosis Elimination

Jeffrey R. Starke, M.D. has the following disclosures to make:

Contact Investigation and Prevention in the USA

Recognizing MDR-TB in Children. Ma. Cecilia G. Ama, MD 23 rd PIDSP Annual Convention February 2016

Clinical Trials Lecture 4: Data analysis

Chapter 1 Overview of Tuberculosis Epidemiology in the United States

The cost-effectiveness of screening for latent tuberculosis infection

Show Me the Money: A Discussion about Investments Needed to Change STD Rates in the United States

Black MSM, HIV, and the Social Determinants of Health Imperative

PS : Comprehensive HIV Prevention Programs for Health Departments

TUBERCULOSIS IN HEALTHCARE SETTINGS Diana M. Nilsen, MD, FCCP Director of Medical Affairs, Bureau of Tuberculosis Control New York City Department of

Isoniazid Preventive Therapy (IPT)

Monitoring hepatitis C treatment uptake in Australia

Implementing FSMA: CDC s Surveillance Provisions

Pediatric Tuberculosis in Los Angeles County: An Update

CDC s Approach to Addressing the Opioid Overdose Epidemic

Comparing Definitions of Current and Active Asthma: An Analysis of BRFSS Asthma Call-back Survey (ACBS) Data

TB BASICS: PRIORITIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS

TB Intensive San Antonio, Texas May 7-10, 2013

Overview of CDC Recommendations for Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT)

Transcription:

Experience with Pyrazinamide and Rifampin Regimens for Latent TB Infection Krista Powell, MD, MPH Co-Project Officer, National Surveillance for Severe Adverse Events Associated with LTBI Treatment Lead, Outbreak Investigations Team Surveillance, Epidemiology, & Outbreak Investigations Branch CDC, Division of TB Elimination National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Division of TB Elimination

Background Targeted testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is a key component of TB elimination Isoniazid (INH) has been mainstay of treatment since 1960s Toxicity concerns and long duration of treatment have limited use of INH to cure LTBI Need for shorter, safer alternatives

Short-Course Alternative Lecour et. al (1989): short-course preventive therapy using 2 months of rifampin (RIF) and pyrazinamide (PZA) in mice RIF and PZA have recognized potential for toxicity during treatment for TB disease In standard combination therapy, RIF may exacerbate INH toxicity PZA associated with Dose-related toxicity Worsening of liver injury in combination with other hepatotoxic drugs Most hepatotoxic potential?

Short-Course Alternative 1998 2000: results published for three randomized treatment trials of 2 months of RIF-PZA (RIF 600 mg, PZA 25 50 mg/kg) versus 6 12 months of INH among human subjects with HIV infection RIF-PZA was as effective as 6 12 months of INH RIF-PZA was better tolerated Better treatment completion with RIF-PZA RIF-PZA trials among human subjects with HIV infection did not identify significant risk of toxicity October 1998: CDC recommended RIF-PZA to treat LTBI in patients with HIV infection

New Recommendation, 2000 Apr 2000: Guidelines for targeted testing & treatment by ATS and CDC Introduction of RIF-PZA as alternative, short-course regimen, expanding recommendation to individuals without HIV infection Strength of recommendations Regimen HIV (+) HIV(-) 9 months INH (daily) A (II) A (II) 6 months INH (daily) C (I) B (I) 2 months of RIF-PZA A (I) B (II) 4 months RIF (daily) B (III) B (II) ATS/CDC. Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. MMWR 2000;49(RR-6):1 54.

Reports of Severe Toxicity Within Months of New Recommendations Apr 2001: CDC publishes report in MMWR, soliciting reports of severe liver injury associated with LTBI treatment CDC. Fatal and severe hepatitis associated with rifampin and pyrazinamide for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection New York, and Georgia, 2000. MMWR 2001;50(15):289 291.

Summary of CDC s Approach Challenge: small case numbers to assess associations Approach: Emergency surveillance system Challenge: lack of denominator data to estimate incidence and risk ratios Approach: Cohort study

Emergency Surveillance System In response to reports of RIF-PZA-associated adverse events, CDC created an emergency surveillance system for adverse events associated with LTBI treatment CDC IRB: urgent public health response, not human subjects research Case definition: liver injury leading to hospitalization or death of a patient being treated for LTBI with RIF-PZA On-site investigations Review of medical records Interviews with health care providers, patients, families

Soliciting Reports Small case numbers to assess associations, so more cases needed Solicitation of reports of severe liver injuries Publications in MMWR Routine meetings with TB-control programs that receive federal funding for TB control ATS newsletter Newsletter sent to health departments and specialists in pulmonary medicine and infectious disease Query of FDA s Adverse Event Reporting System

Systematic Tracking of Liver Injuries Patient demographic characteristics Indications for LTBI testing and treatment Monitoring strategy during therapy Clinical observation, laboratory testing, or both Factors related to diagnosis of severe liver injury Symptoms, onset date, laboratory evaluation results Risk factors for hepatitis Prior liver disease, injection drug use, alcohol use, risk factors for viral hepatitis, testing results for viral hepatitis

Findings, as of Aug 2001 (2 nd MMWR) 21 patients with severe liver injury since 1999 Median age 44 years (range: 28 73 years) 12 men, 9 women Jaundice reported in 15 of 18 patients Of 11 patients tested, none had HIV infection No patient received liver transplant Five patients died Age range: 32 68 years 3 men, 2 women Onset in second month of treatment CDC. Update: fatal and severe liver injuries associated with rifampin and pyrazinamide for latent tuberculosis infection, and revisions in American Thoracic Society/CDC recommendations United States, 2001. MMWR 2001;50(34):733 735.

Findings, as of Aug 2001 10 cases associated with other LTBI treatment regimens Risk for liver injury could not be compared in part because of lack of denominator data Cases among persons without HIV infection were unexpected New recommendations issued to supersede previous recommendations CDC. Update: fatal and severe liver injuries associated with rifampin and pyrazinamide for latent tuberculosis infection, and revisions in American Thoracic Society/CDC recommendations United States, 2001. MMWR 2001;50(34):733 735.

New Recommendations, Aug 2001 RIF-PZA should be used with caution 9 months of daily INH preferred regimen No more than 2-weeks supply of RIF-PZA should be dispensed Clinical evaluation and laboratory monitoring (AST, bilirubin) every 2 weeks for patients receiving RIF-PZA Advised against RIF-PZA for persons with underlying liver disease or previous INH-associated liver injury Report severe liver injury to CDC in persons receiving any regimen for LTBI CDC. Update: fatal and severe liver injuries associated with rifampin and pyrazinamide for latent tuberculosis infection, and revisions in American Thoracic Society/CDC recommendations United States, 2001. MMWR 2001;50(34):733 735.

Ongoing Investigation, as of Nov 2002 (3 rd MMWR) After Aug 2001, CDC continued to solicit reports of adverse effects associated with RIF-PZA 40 cases (8 fatal) reported as of Sep 25, 2002 23 cases (5 fatal) had been described Of 17 cases not previously reported, 2 occurred in patients who initiated treatment after revision of guidelines One had contraindications, one without laboratory monitoring Findings underscored previous recommendations INH is preferred regimen If RIF-PZA offered, revised guidelines should be followed CDC. Public health dispatch: update: fatal and severe liver injuries associated with rifampin and pyrazinamide treatment for latent tuberculosis infection. MMWR 2002;52(44):998 999.

Cohort Study, Aug 2003 (4 th MMWR) Surveillance data had led to revised recommendations, but total number initiating treatment unknown Unable to estimate incidence ratios or risk ratios CDC conducted a two-phase retrospective cohort study to estimate rates of liver injury associated with RIF-PZA Inclusion criteria Patients received treatment of LTBI during Jan 2000 Jun 2002, AND Data for these patients were reported to CDC through Jun 6, 2003 CDC. Update: adverse event data and revised American Thoracic Society/CDC recommendations against the use of rifampin and pyrazinamide for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection United States, 2003. MMWR 2003;52(31):735 739.

Two-Phase Cohort Study Phase I: questionnaire to TB-control programs in 12 large cities and 50 states Dec 2001: Asked programs to identify programs and health care providers prescribing RIF-PZA for LTBI treatment (all responded) Feb 2002: CDC staff called programs and 150 providers that had been identified to confirm use of RIF-PZA Phase II: second questionnaire to 150 health-care providers, requesting aggregate cohort data for Jan 2000 Jun 2002 109 (78%) had responded by Jun 6, 2003 CDC. Update: adverse event data and revised American Thoracic Society/CDC recommendations against the use of rifampin and pyrazinamide for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection United States, 2003. MMWR 2003;52(31):735 739.

States Reporting Some RIF-PZA Use, as of Feb 2002 D.C. Some RIF-PZA use Source: Vernon A. Hepatotoxicity issues: TB treatment regimens with moxifloxacin + PZA, without INH. Presented in London, United Kingdom, October 2004.

Results of Cohort Study 48 reports of severe liver injury (11 fatalities) detected through passive surveillance, including 30 cases detected in phase II Two persons who died had HIV infection 33 (69%) cases occurred in second month 7,737 patients began RIF-PZA for LTBI treatment CDC. Update: adverse event data and revised American Thoracic Society/CDC recommendations against the use of rifampin and pyrazinamide for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection United States, 2003. MMWR 2003;52(31):735 739.

Results of Cohort Study (N=7,737) Event Number Rate per 1,000 treatment initiations (95% confidence interval) Discontinued RIF-PZA because of AST >5 times upper limit of normal Discontinued RIF-PZA because of hepatitis symptoms 204 26.4 (22.8 30.0) 146 18.9 (17.4 20.4) Hospitalization 30 3.0 (1.8 4.2) Death 7 0.9 (0.2 1.6) CDC. Update: adverse event data and revised American Thoracic Society/CDC recommendations against the use of rifampin and pyrazinamide for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection United States, 2003. MMWR 2003;52(31):735 739.

Implications of Findings, Aug 2003 Rates of severe liver injury and death with RIF-PZA higher than reported rates with INH For INH, hospitalization rates of 0.1 0.2 (median 0.15) and mortality rates of 0 0.3 per 1,000 (median 0.04) (based upon historical data) In combination of these with other data, group of TB experts convening in May 2003 suggested revised recommendations CDC. Update: adverse event data and revised American Thoracic Society/CDC recommendations against the use of rifampin and pyrazinamide for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection United States, 2003. MMWR 2003;52(31):735 739.

Revised Recommendations, Aug 2003 RIF-PZA should never be offered to patients who Concurrently take other medications associated with liver injury Drink excess alcohol, even if discontinued during treatment Have underlying liver disease Have history of INH-associated liver injury Revised strength of recommendations Regimen HIV (+) HIV(-) 9 months INH (daily) A (II) A (II) 6 months INH (daily) C (I) B (I) 2 months of RIF-PZA A (I) D (II) B (II) D (II) 4 months RIF (daily) B (III) B (II) CDC. Update: adverse event data and revised American Thoracic Society/CDC recommendations against the use of rifampin and pyrazinamide for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection United States, 2003. MMWR 2003;52(31):735 739.

Summary of Surveillance Data, Oct 1998 Mar 2004 50 cases (12 fatalities) Liver injury attributable to RIF-PZA for all Median age 44 years (range: 17 72 years) 32 (64%) male 5 patients referred for liver transplantation, but none received 2 died, 3 recovered 31 (62%) monitored according to guidelines 9 of whom died Six patients, including 2 who died, without risk factors Ijaz K, Jereb JA, Lambert LA, et al. Severe or fatal liver injury in 50 patients in the United States taking rifampin and pyrazinamide for latent tuberculosis infection. CID 2006;42:346 355.

Summary of Surveillance Data, Oct 1998 Mar 2004 Risk factors for hepatitis 34 (71%) of 48 with alcohol use 33 (66%) of 50 taking additional hepatotoxic medications 7 (16%) of 43 with antibodies to hepatitis C virus 3 (14%) of 22 tested for HIV with positive results (two died) 1 (2%) of 45 with chronic hepatitis B Patients who died tended to be older and took greater numbers of hepatotoxic medications Median age, 52 years vs. 42 years (p=0.05) Median number of medications, 4 vs. 2 (p=0.05) Ijaz K, Jereb JA, Lambert LA, et al. Severe or fatal liver injury in 50 patients in the United States taking rifampin and pyrazinamide for latent tuberculosis infection. CID 2006;42:346 355.

Reports 10 8 Liver Injury Associated with RIF-PZA by Date of Report to CDC, United States (n=50) LTBI guidelines MMWR (1) MMWR (2) MMWR (3) MMWR (4) Fatal Nonfatal 6 4 2 0 Mar-00 Jun-00 Sep-00 Dec-00 Mar-01 Jun-01 Sep-01 Dec-01 Mar-02 Jun-02 Sep-02 Dec-02 Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-03 Dec-03 Mar-04 Jun-04 Sep-04 Dec-04 Mar-05 Report Date Manangan L. National surveillance for severe adverse events for severe adverse events associated with latent tuberculosis infection. Presented November 2006.

Conclusions RIF-PZA was not associated with excess toxicity during trials of HIV-infected patients (cannot exclude rare events) Unexpected liver injury occurred quickly among persons without HIV infection after uptake of new guidelines Surveillance provided useful data to revise guidelines, but additional study was needed to estimate event rates LTBI is not a reportable condition Number of persons initiating treatment unknown outside of studies 3 years after the initial recommendation, RIF-PZA was no longer recommended

Current Status Surprisingly little further understanding of cause, despite obvious association with intact cellular immunity (i.e., HIV negative) and lack of a perceived problem in treatment of TB disease with PZA CDC has continued to collect reports of any severe adverse event associated with any LTBI treatment regimen No reports of severe liver injury with RIF-PZA since Mar 2004 (but regimen is not much used) 2004 2008: 17 events (10 investigated), associated with INH CDC. Severe isoniazid-associated liver injuries among persons being treated for latent tuberculosis infection United States, 2004 2008. MMWR 2010;59(08):224 229.

Local providers should report possible severe adverse events to their respective health departments and to the Food and Drug Administration's MedWatch. State health departments should report these events to CDC's Division of Tuberculosis Elimination (e-mail: LTBIdrugevents@cdc.gov). For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333 Telephone: 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)/TTY: 1-888-232-6348 E-mail: cdcinfo@cdc.gov Web: http://www.cdc.gov The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Division of TB Elimination