Lecture 6. Burr BIO 4353/6345 HIV/AIDS. Tetramer staining of T cells (CTL s) Andrew McMichael seminar: Background

Similar documents
Antigen Presentation to T lymphocytes

The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC)

Lecture 11. Immunology and disease: parasite antigenic diversity

Antigen Presentation to T lymphocytes

Vaccine Design: A Statisticans Overview

RAISON D ETRE OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM:

Principles of Adaptive Immunity

Structure and Function of Antigen Recognition Molecules

Antigen Recognition by T cells

Helminth worm, Schistosomiasis Trypanosomes, sleeping sickness Pneumocystis carinii. Ringworm fungus HIV Influenza

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The Generation of Specific Immunity

Mechanisms of antagonism of HIVspecific CD4+ T cell responses BSRI

Potential cross reactions between HIV 1 specific T cells and the microbiome. Andrew McMichael Suzanne Campion

White Blood Cells (WBCs)

Adaptive Immune System

Significance of the MHC

The Adaptive Immune Response. T-cells

7.012 Quiz 3 Answers

Charges on amino acids and proteins. ph 1. ph 7. Acidic side chains: glutamate and aspartate

Attribution: University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Microbiology and Immunology

T Cell Differentiation

RAISON D ETRE OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM:

cure research HIV & AIDS

Immunology - Lecture 2 Adaptive Immune System 1

Immune response. This overview figure summarizes simply how our body responds to foreign molecules that enter to it.

Supplementary Figure 1. Using DNA barcode-labeled MHC multimers to generate TCR fingerprints

How T cells recognize antigen: The T Cell Receptor (TCR) Identifying the TCR: Why was it so hard to do? Monoclonal antibody approach

A second type of TCR TCR: An αβ heterodimer

How HIV Causes Disease Prof. Bruce D. Walker

Introduction to Immunology Part 2 September 30, Dan Stetson

Supplementary Data 1. Alanine substitutions and position variants of APNCYGNIPL. Applied in

Tumors arise from accumulated genetic mutations. Tumor Immunology (Cancer)

Antigen Receptor Structures October 14, Ram Savan

Pathogens and the immune system

Immune surveillance: The immune system can recognize and destroy nascent malignant cells

all of the above the ability to impart long term memory adaptive immunity all of the above bone marrow none of the above

EBV Infection and Immunity. Andrew Hislop Institute for Cancer Studies University of Birmingham

Significance of the MHC

Chapter 6. Antigen Presentation to T lymphocytes

CHAPTER 18: Immune System

Phase of immune response

Significance of the MHC

Week 5 Section. Junaid Malek, M.D.

Antigen Presentation and T Lymphocyte Activation. Abul K. Abbas UCSF. FOCiS

Innate and Cellular Immunology Control of Infection by Cell-mediated Immunity

T cell recognition. Statistics & Dynamics of Functional Sensitivity

Fayth K. Yoshimura, Ph.D. September 7, of 7 HIV - BASIC PROPERTIES

MHC Tetramers and Monomers for Immuno-Oncology and Autoimmunity Drug Discovery

Cytotoxicity assays. Rory D. de Vries, PhD 1. Viroscience lab, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Chapter 17B: Adaptive Immunity Part II

Basic Immunology. Lecture 5 th and 6 th Recognition by MHC. Antigen presentation and MHC restriction

Test Bank for Basic Immunology Functions and Disorders of the Immune System 4th Edition by Abbas

General information. Cell mediated immunity. 455 LSA, Tuesday 11 to noon. Anytime after class.

Adaptive Immune Response Day 2. The Adaptive Immune Response

Practical Solution: presentation to cytotoxic T cells. How dendritic cells present antigen. How dendritic cells present antigen

Campbell's Biology: Concepts and Connections, 7e (Reece et al.) Chapter 24 The Immune System Multiple-Choice Questions

TCR, MHC and coreceptors

The T cell receptor for MHC-associated peptide antigens

Page 4: Antigens: Self-Antigens The body has a vast number of its own antigens called self-antigens. These normally do not trigger immune responses.

1. Overview of Adaptive Immunity

COURSE: Medical Microbiology, PAMB 650/720 - Fall 2008 Lecture 16

NK mediated Antibody Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity in HIV infections

Neutrophils Macrophages CD4+ T-cells CD8+ T-cells B-cells None

Immune System AP SBI4UP

All animals have innate immunity, a defense active immediately upon infection Vertebrates also have adaptive immunity

CELL BIOLOGY - CLUTCH CH THE IMMUNE SYSTEM.

The Immune System. These are classified as the Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses. Innate Immunity

Unit 6: Adaptive Immunity. Adaptive Immunity (Humoral Immunity; Cell-Mediated Immunity; Immunodeficiency; Hypersensitivity)

A Query by HIV. I. A query by HIV. II. Recursion

7.014 Problem Set 7 Solutions

ARV Mode of Action. Mode of Action. Mode of Action NRTI. Immunopaedia.org.za

Title: NATURAL KILLER CELL FUNCTIONS AND SURFACE RECEPTORS

MHC class I MHC class II Structure of MHC antigens:

Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) and T Cell Receptors

Scott Abrams, Ph.D. Professor of Oncology, x4375 Kuby Immunology SEVENTH EDITION

IMMUNE CELL SURFACE RECEPTORS AND THEIR FUNCTIONS

HLA and antigen presentation. Department of Immunology Charles University, 2nd Medical School University Hospital Motol

Prof. Ibtesam Kamel Afifi Professor of Medical Microbiology & Immunology

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is a group of genes that governs tumor and tissue transplantation between individuals of a species.

There are approximately 30,000 proteasomes in a typical human cell Each proteasome is approximately 700 kda in size The proteasome is made up of 3

FOCiS. Lecture outline. The immunological equilibrium: balancing lymphocyte activation and control. Immunological tolerance and immune regulation -- 1

HLA and antigen presentation. Department of Immunology Charles University, 2nd Medical School University Hospital Motol

Diseases-causing agents, pathogens, can produce infections within the body.

Cellular Neurobiology BIPN140. 1st Midterm Exam October 18 th, Tuesday Material covered: Lectures 1-6 & Reading

B F. Location of MHC class I pockets termed B and F that bind P2 and P9 amino acid side chains of the peptide

Key Concept B F. How do peptides get loaded onto the proper kind of MHC molecule?

Immunology: an overview Lecture

Evidence of HIV-1 Adaptation to HLA- Restricted Immune Responses at a Population Level. Corey Benjamin Moore

[Some people are Rh positive and some are Rh negative whether they have the D antigen on the surface of their cells or not].

T cell development October 28, Dan Stetson

Antigen presenting cells

Newsletter 2018 vol

Clinical Education Initiative HIV CONTROLLERS: IMPLICATIONS FOR HIV CURE/REMISSION. Bruce Walker, MD

The Adaptive Immune Response: T lymphocytes and Their Functional Types *

Immunology Basics Relevant to Cancer Immunotherapy: T Cell Activation, Costimulation, and Effector T Cells

the HLA complex Hanna Mustaniemi,

Alessandra Franco MD PhD UCSD School of Medicine Department of Pediatrics Division of Allergy Immunology and Rheumatology

Immunology. Teamwork 437. Lecture (3): Cell Mediated Immunity. Color index: IMPORTANT Definition Explanations + notes Extra (or gray)

Immune system. Aims. Immune system. Lymphatic organs. Inflammation. Natural immune system. Adaptive immune system

Transcription:

Lecture 6 Burr BIO 4353/6345 HIV/AIDS Andrew McMichael seminar: Background Tetramer staining of T cells (CTL s) 1. Vβ 19: There are 52 T cell receptor (TCR) Vβ gene segments in germ line DNA (See following page 208 in notes, Parham, fig 3.3, ), and there are commercially available DNA probes for all of them. In any person, any particular T cell clone will have a 1:52 chance of expressing a receptor that contains a particular Vβ-encoded variable region. Thus, if one sees, as McMichael did, that in patient 1, shortly after HIV-infection, 30% of CTL s express Vβ-19, that means that these Vβ-19 cells probably represent a single clone of CTLs that have proliferated massively, and are directed against one particular viral peptide. This is referred to as an immunodominant response. (CTL = cytotoxic lymphocyte; also known as killer T-cells; CD8-expressing T cells) 2. For each patient in their study, McMichael s group determined the allelic form of each of his or her 6 MHC-I genes (2 each of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C). For almost all HLA alleles, certainly the most common ones, the anchor residues are known. Since the amino acid sequences of all the HIV proteins are known, the McMichael group could determine which HIV peptides might be bound by a particular patient s set of MHC-I molecules. 3. Knowing the HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C haplotypes of the patient, they could then create a set of engineered molecules (HLA + peptide) that could specifically stain clones of the patient s T-cells (ie, be recognized by the T-cell receptors of that patient); of particular interest, of course, are the T cell clones that would arise after infection, directed against one or all of the viral peptides which that particular patient s MHC-I molecules would be able to present. To recapitulate: each of these specific molecular T-cell stains consists of a molecule of fluorescently-tagged streptavidin, binding four identical avidin-tagged molecules of MHC-I molecules. (The MHC-I molecules being used would in each case correspond to one of the patient s 6 MHC-I isoforms). The four MHC-I molecules would each contain a bound peptide, corresponding to one of the viral peptides which that particular MHC-I isoform is known to bind (and present to T cells). A particular fluorescence-tagged MHC-I tetramer/peptide complex is then used to stain specific a specific clone of T-cells present in the blood of a patient; ie, those T-cells whose receptors (TCRs) are specifically directed against that particular peptide/mhc-i complex. This is referred to as tetramer staining. Stained T-cell populations are then resolved by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). (One has to have at least a tetramer of fluorescently-tagged MHC-I/peptide complexes, binding to 4 TCR molecules on a T cell, to get sufficiently tight binding of the fluorescent stain to the cells so that FACS experiments can be performed.) 207

Burr BIO 4353/6345 HIV/AIDS Andrew McMichael Seminar: Highlights Refer to Xeroxed lecture notes (numbered as pp M1-M14; first page says Lecture Notes for McMichael Seminar). Page M5, fig 7: a cytotoxic lymphocyte (CTL) (Killer T-cell) response (not antibodies) controls the early burst of virus production (and CTLs continue to control the virus thereafter, until HIV mutants finally arise that can no longer be controlled). Pages M6, M7; figs 9-12: a single immunodominant clone of CTLs, directed against a single viral peptide, is responsible for controlling HIV levels in many cases (in some cases not just one clone, but two or three clones) Page M8, fig 15: CTL are most effective if they can kill an infected cell within the first 20 hours after infection, before progeny virus are released from the infected cell. (On average, virus begins to be released from a cell approximately one day after infection.) Page M9, figs 17, 18: Patient 007: the immunodominant CTL clone in this patient that is controlling the virus recognizes a peptide derived from the p24 (capsid) protein; this peptide is presented on infected cells by the patient s HLA B27 (MHC-I) molecules. On this peptide there is an arginine (R) at position 2 that is an anchor residue for the binding of this peptide to the B27 molecule (see lecture notes, p194, to review the concept of an anchor residue ). P24 peptide amino acid sequence: K R W I I (L/M) G L M K Arginine anchor residue Lysine, another amino acid with a positively charged side chain like arginine, cannot substitute for arg in terms of the ability of the peptide to bind to the B27 MHC molecule. (But in many proteins, a mutational substitution of lys for arg has little effect on the folding and therefore function of a protein.) Why did a mutant virus, with an R to L substitution, not immediately arise in the infected patient 007? K K W I I (L/M) G L M K Page M9, fig 18: In 1989 (12 years after infection) this mutant did finally arise; because it could not be controlled by the patient s immunodominant CTL clone (the clone that recognized the K R W I I (L/M) G L M K peptide presented by the patients B27 molecule) that mutant virus then became the main virus expressed in the patient. This is called an escape mutant and because the immunodominant clone of CTL can no longer kill HIV-infected cells, the appearance of such mutants results in a transient increase in the concentration of HIV in the blood of the patient (and of course, a decline in T Helper cell counts, as the increased amount of virus kills more T Helper cells) (see fig 23, p. M11). Furthermore, the next best clone of CTL that subsequently arises can t respond as well to the next best immunodominant peptide in this mutant strain of virus, so the steady state level of virus will also be higher than it was before. As time goes on, steady state levels of virus will continue to increase in the patient, as each succeeding escape mutant arises, and CTL are less and less able to defend against these mutants. Page M11, fig 25: Why did it take 12 years for an escape mutant to arise in patient 007? Refer to lecture notes, pages 15 & 16 ( Andrew McMichael seminar take-home message ). M 14(b) 212

Burr BIO 4353/6345 HIV/AIDS Andrew McMichael Seminar: Highlights Refer to Xeroxed lecture notes (numbered as pp M1-M14; first page says Lecture Notes for McMichael Seminar). Page M5, fig 7: a cytotoxic lymphocyte (CTL) (Killer T-cell) response (not antibodies) controls the early burst of virus production (and CTLs continue to control the virus thereafter, until HIV mutants finally arise that can no longer be controlled). Pages M6, M7; figs 9-12: a single immunodominant clone of CTLs, directed against a single viral peptide, is responsible for controlling HIV levels in many cases (in some cases not just one clone, but two or three clones) Page M8, fig 15: CTL are most effective if they can kill an infected cell within the first 20 hours after infection, before progeny virus are released from the infected cell. (On average, virus begins to be released from a cell approximately one day after infection.) Page M9, figs 17, 18: Patient 007: the immunodominant CTL clone in this patient that is controlling the virus recognizes a peptide derived from the p24 (capsid) protein; this peptide is presented on infected cells by the patient s HLA B27 (MHC-I) molecules. On this peptide there is an arginine (R) at position 2 that is an anchor residue for the binding of this peptide to the B27 molecule (see lecture notes, p194, to review the concept of an anchor residue ). P24 peptide amino acid sequence: K R W I I (L/M) G L M K Arginine anchor residue Lysine, another amino acid with a positively charged side chain like arginine, cannot substitute for arg in terms of the ability of the peptide to bind to the B27 MHC molecule. (But in many proteins, a mutational substitution of lys for arg has little effect on the folding and therefore function of a protein.) Why did a mutant virus, with an R to L substitution, not immediately arise in the infected patient 007? K K W I I (L/M) G L M K Page M9, fig 18: In 1989 (12 years after infection) this mutant did finally arise; because it could not be controlled by the patient s immunodominant CTL clone (the clone that recognized the K R W I I (L/M) G L M K peptide presented by the patients B27 molecule) that mutant virus then became the main virus expressed in the patient. This is called an escape mutant and because the immunodominant clone of CTL can no longer kill HIV-infected cells, the appearance of such mutants results in a transient increase in the concentration of HIV in the blood of the patient (and of course, a decline in T Helper cell counts, as the increased amount of virus kills more T Helper cells) (see fig 23, p. M11). Furthermore, the next best clone of CTL that subsequently arises can t respond as well to the next best immunodominant peptide in this mutant strain of virus, so the steady state level of virus will also be higher than it was before. As time goes on, steady state levels of virus will continue to increase in the patient, as each succeeding escape mutant arises, and CTL are less and less able to defend against these mutants. Page M11, fig 25: Why did it take 12 years for an escape mutant to arise in patient 007? Refer to lecture notes, pages 15 & 16 ( Andrew McMichael seminar take-home message ). M 14(b) 212