Task Force High Oil Corn Composition. Dirk E. Maier & Jenni L. Briggs, Agricultural & Biological Engineering $.30 $.53 $.25 $45 $.315 $.

Similar documents
High Value Soybean Composition

Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) An Effective and Available Livestock and Poultry Feed Ingredient

The Impact of the Ethanol Industry on Pork Production

Matching Hay to the Cow s Requirement Based on Forage Test

Quality of the United States Soybean Crop: Dr. Jill Miller-Garvin, Dr. James Orf, and Dr. Seth Naeve

FEEDING VALUE OF WET DISTILLERS GRAINS FOR LACTATING DAIRY COWS WHEN CO-ENSILED WITH CORN SILAGE OR HAYCROP SILAGE

Opportunities for Using DDGS in Livestock and Poultry Feeds in Canada. Dr. Jerry Shurson Dept. of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Lambs & Fieldpeas Sheep Day Report. Field Pea as a feedstuff for growing lambs. Introduction

The Science of Maryland Agriculture

mycotoxin-contaminated contaminated food or feed

ESTIMATING THE ENERGY VALUE OF CORN SILAGE AND OTHER FORAGES. P.H. Robinson 1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

WELCOME MYCOGEN SEEDS UPDATE

2017 HEARTLAND BANK CORN TRIALS

Selenium Toxicity in the Western United States Pork Industry

The Effects of Soybean Protein Changes on Major Agricultural Markets

Exercise 6 Ration Formulation II Balance for Three or More Nutrients 20 Points

2011 VERMONT ORGANIC CORN SILAGE VARIETY TRIAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

Understanding and Managing Variation in Nutrient Composition

THE INFLUENCE OF CORN SILAGE HYBRID VARIETY ON BEEF STEER GROWTH PERFORMANCE. Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph

Quality of the United States Soybean Crop: Dr. Seth Naeve, Dr. James Orf, Dr. Jill Miller-Garvin, and Mr. Nick Weidenbenner

SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES: TIPS FOR EVALUATING VARIETIES AND TEST RESULTS. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

Nanofeed Detector A Simple Gadget that Protects the Health of Farm Animals and it s Industry from Contaminated Feeds. Dr. Gil Nonato C.

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Quality Characteristics and Nutritional Profiles of DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

John McKinney Illinois Crop Improvement Association

DDGS: An Evolving Commodity. Dr. Jerry Shurson University of Minnesota

Soybean meal value variation: A case study in U.S. swine BEYOND SOYBEAN PROTEIN & OIL. In a bean pod INTRODUCTION

Identifying Valuable Corn Quality Traits for Livestock Feed A project of the Iowa Grain Quality Initiative Traits Task Team

2016/17 Wheat & Barley Harvest Grain Sample Analysis

THE INFLUENCE OF CORN SILAGE FEEDING LEVEL ON BEEF STEER GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY

Efficient Use of Forages and Impact on Cost of Production

Estimating Manure Nutrient Excretion

Summary Report 3/2/05. Guowu Xu, Mark Whitney, and Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Research Report Forage Sorghum Hybrid Yield and Quality at Maricopa, AZ, 2015

Product Purpose Statement for Commercial Feed Eli Miller University of Kentucky Lexington, KY May 15, 1997

Feeding Ethanol Co-products from Corn to Beef Cattle

Implications of Ingredient Availability Opportunities for Vegetable Protein Meals

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Iron Chelates in Managing Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Grain Sorghum

Feeding Considerations for Byproduct Feeding

Feeding Methods. Assist.Prof.Dr. Dhia Al-Khayat

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Exercise 2 Feed Composition and Nutrient Requirements 20 Points

The Benefits and Costs of Commodity Feeding

Randomness Rules: Living with Variation in the Nutrient Composition of Concentrate Feeds 1

Custom Rates for Colorado Farms & Ranches in 2017 Jenny Beiermann, Norman Dalsted, Jeffrey E. Tranel, R. Brent Young, and Jackie Seyler A

Improving Management Of Soybean Cyst Nematode Through Extension Demonstration And Outreach

Issues and Opportunities Related to the Production and Marketing of Ethanol By-Products

HarvestLab John Deere Constituent Sensing

Randomness Rules: Living with Variation in the Nutrient Composition of Concentrate Feeds

USE OF DDGS AS A FEED INGREDIENT ETHANOL AND DDGS OVERVIEW AN EVOLVING ETHANOL INDUSTRY

Feeding Strategies When Alfalfa Supplies are Short

The Impact of Feeding Corn DDGS and Phytase on Manure Phosphorus Management in Pork Production

Effects of feeding different levels of sesame oil cake on performance and digestibility of Awassi lambs

Sustainable Fish Diets for the 21st Century using Soybean Protein. Paul B. Brown, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA

Making Forage Analysis Work for You in Balancing Livestock Rations and Marketing Hay

Feed Management to Improve Nitrogen and Phosphorus Efficiency. Charles C. Stallings Professor and Extension Dairy Scientist Virginia Tech

Effect of corn silage chemical analysis and ration adjustment frequency on milk production and profitability

FACING THE DIMINISHING CORN SUPPLY: DAIRY ALTERNATIVES

Amino Acid Composition of Ingredients: Crop Year 2010

Quality of the 2002 Soybean Crop in the United States

The Key to What Sells Distiller s Grains. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

FACTORS AFFECTING MANURE EXCRETION BY DAIRY COWS 1

Evaluation of Wet Distillers Grains for Finishing Cattle

Research Sells DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

SHREDLAGE IN DAIRY CATTLE RATIONS. L. E. Chase Cornell University

UTILIZATION OF BY-PRODUCTS FROM FOOD PROCESSING AS LIVESTOCK FEED IN JAPAN

Custom Rates for Colorado Farms & Ranches in 2015 Jesse Russell, Norman Dalsted, Jeffrey E. Tranel, R. Brent Young, and Jackie Seyler A

Industrial Hemp Production 101

Burt Bluhm Department of Plant Pathology University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture

Indiana State Board of Animal Health

Corn By-Product Diversity and Feeding Value to Non-Ruminants

DAIRY FOCUS AT ILLINOIS NEWSLETTER. Focus on Forages Volume 2, Number 1

GrainCorp Feeds. Delivering you choice and flexibility

The Science of Maryland Agriculture

BUSINESS MODEL. Ethanol Marketing. Risk Management POET. Biomass POET. Research. Co-Product Marketing Plant Management POET.

MICROBIAL INOCULANT EFFECTS ON IN SITU RUMINAL DRY MATTER AND NEUTRAL DETERGENT FIBER DISAPPEARANCE OF CORN SILAGE

COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF AWASSI LAMBS FATTENING SYSTEMS IN PALESTINE.

Dairy Update. Issue 110 July 1992 ALTERNATIVE FEEDSTUFFS FOR DAIRY. Vern Oraskovich Agriculture Extension Agent Carver County

Grower-Finisher Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Pigs Fed Genetically Modified Bt Corn

Feed ID Options /10/2016. DM% CP% TDN% Fat% Ca% P%

Navigating the dairy feed situation

DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH-AMYLOSE CORN VARIETIES FOR NORTHEAST MISSOURI: A POSSIBLE SPECIALTY CROP OPPORTUNITY FOR LOCAL PRODUCERS.

5.9 DIFLUBENZURON (130)

EFC-01 Fall Feeding Distiller Grains to Hogs. Ron Plain 1

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

Your Animals, Our Science

Functional Properties of Foods. Database and Model Prediction

FACING THE DIMINISHING CORN SUPPLY: DAIRY ALTERNATIVES

DISTILLERS GRAINS TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL. Increasing the awareness of the value of Distillers Grains

Sheep Feeding Programs: Forage and Feed Analysis

Quality Grain Management Effects on the Feed Industry. Ben Weaver Regional Account Manager

The Use of Distiller s Grains By-products in Livestock and Poultry Diets. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

2017 ILeVO Trial Harvest Report

Session Overview. Session Objectives. Location of Information on Labels. What is required on all labels? 5/21/2013

MANAGING MARESTAIL AND GIANT RAGWEED IN WHEAT

Overview of Nutritional Characteristics of DDGS in Aquaculture Feeds. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

FOOD SAFETY SUMMIT AFRICA CONFERENCE & EXPO

Keeping Control of Feed Costs in an Uncertain Market

Approaches for 100 percent organic feed to organic poultry in Sweden

The Effect of Feeding Starter Diets for Different Periods on Performance of Broilers

Transcription:

GRAIN QUALITY Task Force High Oil orn omposition Dirk E. Maier & Jenni L. Briggs, Agricultural & Biological Engineering Fact Sheet #33 November 19, 1997 We have received numerous inquiries about oil levels measured in high oil corn (HO) samples submitted to our Grain omposition Analysis Service. This fact sheet summarizes the composition data compiled for HO samples received in our lab since the fall of 1996. These samples were submitted by individual HO producers or elevators. They do not represent samples from a scientific survey. According to surveys by the U.S. Feed Grains ouncil, 1996 yields for corn raised under DuPont s Top ross system averaged between 90% and 105% of standard corn hybrids. Typical high oil corn premiums received by farmers ranged from 15 to 30 cents/bushel, with an average of 27 cents/bushel. The marketing channel received between 6 to 11 cents/bushel for contracting and segregating HO hybrids. urrent premiums for HO in Indiana range from 10 cents/bushel for a minimum of 6.0% (dry basis) to as high as 40 cents/bushel for a minimum of 8.5% oil (dry basis). Late this summer, premiums of up to 80 cents/bushel were reported from one location for old crop HO. According to researched published by DuPont, the total opportunity value of high oil corn for feeding dairy, beef, swine, and poultry ranges from 25 to 64 cents/bushel (Fig. 1). At least 12 elevators in Indiana are contracting high oil corn for the 1997 season. all our lab for more information on HO analysis and a list of contracting locations. Dry vs. Wet Basis There appears to be some confusion about the moisture basis used to report composition results. In the grain industry, no one moisture basis is standard. Accepted practice among many elevators in the Western orn Belt has been to report composition on a 15% moisture basis for corn and a 13% moisture basis for soybeans. However, elevators that deal specifically with HO contracts tend to specify premiums on a dry basis. onversion from one to the other is easily accomplished by using the Dairy $.30 $.53 Beef $.25 $45 Swine $.315 $.59 Poultry $.35 $.64 $.25 $.35 $.45 $.55 $.65 Figure 1. Total opportunity value of high oil corn when fed to various livestock (Source: DuPont Optimum Grains). is an equal opportunity/equal access institution. page 1 of 5

following equations: [1] [2] DB M M = 100* 100 M = DB or ( 100 M) 100 where M is the given percent moisture; DB is the percent component (oil, starch, or protein) on a dry basis; and M is the percent component based on M moisture. For example, a corn sample with a 6.0% oil content on a 15% moisture basis has 7.1% (Eq. [1], 100*6.0/(100-15)) oil on a dry basis. A corn sample with an oil content of 7.5% on a dry basis has an oil content of 6.4% (Eq. [2], 7.5*(100-15)/100) on a 15% moisture basis. HO Sample Data All samples were analyzed using a nearinfrared whole grain analyzer (Infratech 1229) located in our Grain Quality Lab. Table 1 summarizes the compositional data for 1996 HO samples. Data from only three hybrids are available. Oil content from samples analyzed in 1996 averaged 8.2% and ranged from 7.2 to 8.8% on a dry basis. HO samples received thus far for analysis from the 1997 harvest averaged 8.1% oil and ranged from 6.8 to 8.7% on a dry basis (Table 2). 1997 data includes two different hybrids. Based on samples analyzed in our lab from 1996 to the present, the average oil content has remained unchanged. Assuming hybrid is the only factor that affects oil content, the oil averages among the five hybrids presented in Tables 1 and 2 are statistically different based on a one-way ANOVA at a 95% confidence level. Table 3 shows samples received from two private plot tests in Southwest Indiana harvested in late September and early October 1997. Oil contents of the HO samples averaged 7.1 and ranged from 4.8 to 8.5% on a dry basis (Table 3a). The results indicate that one sample (Garst 8396T) had an oil content below 6.0% dry basis, which would not qualify for a premium. Additionally, farm samples of Wyffells 7115T (Table 2) averaged 0.7-0.8 percentage points of oil higher than the two plot samples. NK6423T farm samples averaged 0.7 points of oil higher than the NK6423T sample from plot 1 and 0.2 points lower than the sample from plot 2. None of the 1996 HO hybrids analyzed in 1996 were included in the 1997 HO plot tests. There were several regular corn hybrids grown in these test plots as well (Table 3b). Lower oil contents in the HO hybrids may have been caused by cross pollination effects. This observation is supported by the somewhat higher oil levels in the regular corn hybrids, ranging from 4.3 to 5.3% on a dry basis compared to normal corn oil levels of about 4.3% dry basis. Further studies are needed to quantify this effect. Plans are currently being formulated by agronomists to plant several HO plot trials throughout Indiana in 1998. Additionally, Purdue animal scientists are initiating several HO feeding studies this fall with swine, beef, and poultry. Drying behavior and storability research is currently being undertaken in the Purdue Grain Quality Lab. As was pointed out in Grain Quality Fact Sheet #32, one of the 1996 state survey samples analyzed was a high oil corn hybrid. The composition values for this sample were 7.1% oil, 10.6% protein, and 55.7% starch (all values based on 15% moisture). It is expected that the 1997 state survey will include several HO samples. is an equal opportunity/equal access institution. page 2 of 5

Table 1. 1996 HO omposition Samples. Variety % Protein* % Oil* % Oil (dry basis) % Starch* Density (g/ml) Agrigold 6510T 8.8 6.1 7.2 56.9 1.27 8.8 6.1 7.2 56.9 1.27 Average 8.8 6.1 7.2 56.9 1.27 Wyffels 5875T 10.2 7.5 8.8 54.6 1.28 8.9 7.5 8.8 55.7 1.27 9.5 7.3 8.6 55.2 1.28 9.5 7.3 8.6 55.2 1.28 9.3 7.3 8.6 55.5 1.28 9.3 7.3 8.6 55.5 1.28 9.3 7.3 8.6 55.0 1.28 9.3 7.3 8.6 55.0 1.28 9.3 7.2 8.5 55.4 1.28 9.3 7.2 8.5 55.4 1.28 8.1 7.1 8.4 56.6 1.24 9.8 7.0 8.2 56.0 1.27 9.8 7.0 8.2 56.0 1.27 8.1 7.0 8.2 56.1 1.24 8.2 6.9 8.1 55.0 1.23 7.9 6.9 8.1 56.8 1.24 8.8 6.8 8.0 57.4 1.25 7.2 6.8 8.0 53.3 1.24 7.2 6.8 8.0 53.3 1.24 6.9 6.8 8.0 54.4 1.25 6.9 6.8 8.0 54.4 1.25 6.9 6.8 8.0 54.0 1.25 6.9 6.8 8.0 54.0 1.25 6.6 6.8 8.0 54.8 1.25 6.6 6.8 8.0 54.8 1.25 8.3 6.7 7.9 56.2 1.24 8.3 6.7 7.9 57.0 1.25 8.2 6.7 7.9 57.3 1.27 Average 8.4 7.0 8.3 55.3 1.26 Wyffels 7001T 9.3 7.0 8.2 55.9 1.26 9.3 7.0 8.2 55.9 1.26 9.2 7.0 8.2 55.9 1.26 9.2 7.0 8.2 55.9 1.26 9.7 6.9 8.1 55.4 1.25 9.7 6.9 8.1 55.4 1.25 9.2 6.9 8.1 55.8 1.26 9.2 6.9 8.1 55.8 1.26 9.1 6.9 8.1 56.2 1.26 9.1 6.9 8.1 56.2 1.26 8.6 6.9 8.1 56.1 1.27 9.5 6.6 7.8 56.8 1.28 Average 9.3 6.9 8.1 55.9 1.26 1996 Average 8.7 6.9 8.2 55.6 1.26 1996 Minimum 6.6 6.1 7.2 53.3 1.23 1996 Maximum 10.2 7.5 8.8 57.4 1.28 *based on 15% moisture is an equal opportunity/equal access institution. page 3 of 5

Table 2. 1997 HO omposition Samples (as of October 31, 1997). Hybrid % Protein* % Oil* % Oil (dry basis) % Starch* Density (g/ml) NK 6423T 8.7 7.4 8.7 53.6 1.27 9.4 6.6 7.8 54.7 1.29 8.5 6.6 7.8 55.5 1.27 8.6 6.3 7.4 55.4 1.28 8.1 6.3 7.4 55.0 1.27 8.7 6.0 7.1 54.9 1.27 8.0 5.8 6.8 56.2 1.27 Average 8.6 6.4 7.6 55.0 1.27 Wyffels 7115T 9.0 7.4 8.7 54.0 1.28 8.6 7.4 8.7 54.1 1.28 8.3 7.4 8.7 54.9 1.27 8.6 7.3 8.6 54.1 1.27 8.6 7.2 8.5 54.5 1.28 8.5 7.1 8.4 54.5 1.28 8.4 7.1 8.4 55.0 1.27 Average 8.6 7.3 8.6 54.4 1.27 1997 Average 8.6 6.9 8.1 54.7 1.27 1997 Minimum 8.0 5.8 6.8 53.6 1.27 1997 Maximum 9.4 7.4 8.7 56.2 1.29 *based on 15% moisture Table 3a. 1997 omposition Values for HO Hybrids in Two Southwest Indiana Private Test Plots. Hybrid Plot % Protein* % Oil* % Oil (dry basis) % Starch* Density (g/ml) NX 6607 2 8.6 7.2 8.5 53.6 1.28 Wyffels 7075T 1 9.4 6.8 8 53.9 1.26 NX 6205 2 8.5 6.8 8 55.6 1.28 Wyffels 7115T 1 9.4 6.7 7.9 54.5 1.28 NX 5526 2 9.2 6.7 7.9 54.7 1.28 Wyffels 7115T 1 8.4 6.6 7.8 54.9 1.26 NK 6423T 2 8.2 6.6 7.8 55.0 1.27 Wyffels 7025T 1 8.8 6.0 7.1 55.2 1.26 Agrigold XA4306T8 1 8.4 6.0 7.1 54.7 1.23 NK 6423T 1 8.8 5.9 6.9 55.5 1.26 NK NX7105 2 8.1 5.9 6.9 55.8 1.27 Agrigold 6460T 1 8.2 5.6 6.6 55.4 1.25 Agrigold XA4503T 1 8.3 5.5 6.5 55.7 1.24 Agrigold 6595T 1 8.3 5.3 6.2 56.4 1.24 Wyffels 6775T 1 8.7 5.2 6.1 56.3 1.25 Garst 8396T 1 9.2 4.0 4.8 56.6 1.28 Average 8.7 6.1 7.1 55.2 1.26 Minimum 8.1 4.0 4.8 53.6 1.23 Maximum 9.4 7.2 8.5 56.6 1.28 * based on 15% moisture is an equal opportunity/equal access institution. page 4 of 5

Where to Submit Samples The Grain Quality Laboratory continues to offer composition analysis for whole corn, soybeans, wheat, and soybean meal FREE of charge to any Indiana farmer, elevator, or processor for the second year in a row. Send 450 g (about 1 lb.) samples to: Grain Quality Laboratory 1146 ABE West Lafayette, IN 47907-1146 For further information, call (765) 494-2285; send e-mail to grainlab@ecn.purdue.edu; or visit us on the World Wide Web at <http:// pasture.ecn.purdue.edu/~grainlab>. For submission of larger numbers of samples, please call ahead to make special arrangements. Grain Quality Fact Sheets can be accessed on-line through: World Wide Web: <http://pasture.ecn.purdue.edu/~grainlab> (select) On-line Extension Publications (select) Grain Quality Almanac: send e-mail to: almanac@ecn.purdue.edu Message: send grain guide or send grain catalog or send grain factsheet#12 (for example) or send acsonline GQ-12 Acknowledgment The authors express their appreciation to Mr. Jerry Lubbehusen, Manager, Farmers Fertilizer & Seed o., Miles Farm Supply Inc., Odon, Indiana, for making corn samples available for this study. The Purdue Grain omposition Analysis Service is supported through grants from the Indiana Agriculture ommissioner s Value-Added Grant Progam. Table 3b. 1997 omposition Values for Regular Hybrids in Two Southwest Indiana Private Test Plots. Hybrid Plot % Protein* % Oil* % Oil (dry basis) % Starch* Density (g/ml) NK 6423 2 9.1 4.5 5.3 56.8 1.30 Garst 8330 1 8.3 4.1 4.8 56.8 1.27 NK 4394 2 9.1 4.0 4.7 58.0 1.30 NK 6423 2 8.8 4.0 4.7 56.9 1.29 NK N7070 2 8.5 4.0 4.7 57.5 1.28 Garst 8451 1 7.9 4.0 4.7 58.1 1.26 Garst 8242 1 8.9 3.9 4.6 56.7 1.26 Garst 5336 1 7.9 3.9 4.6 57.7 1.26 Garst 8325 1 7.9 3.9 4.6 57.4 1.25 Garst 8366 1 8.2 3.8 4.4 57.2 1.25 Garst 5440 1 8.4 3.6 4.3 57.7 1.27 Average 8.5 4.0 4.7 57.3 1.27 Minimum 7.9 3.6 4.3 56.7 1.25 Maximum 9.1 4.5 5.3 58.1 1.3 * based on 15% moisture is an equal opportunity/equal access institution. page 5 of 5