The Severity of Pedestrian Injuries in Alcohol-Related Collisions

Similar documents
The British Columbia Coroners Service is committed to conducting a thorough, independent examination of the factors contributing to death in order to

How Safe Are Our Roads? 2016 Checkpoint Strikeforce campaign poster celebrating real area cab drivers as being Beautiful designated sober drivers.

DRUG AND ALCOHOL USE

THE PRESENCE OF ALCOHOL AND/OR DRUGS IN MOTOR VEHICLE FATALITIES, BY JURISDICTION: CANADA, 2013 November 15, 2017

Crash Risk of Alcohol Impaired Driving

The correlation of marijuana, alcohol, and other drug use with risky driving behavior. Gloriam Vanine Guenzburger, CA DMV

INCIDENCE, HEALTH OUTCOMES AND COSTS RELATED TO MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES IN WHICH ALCOHOL WAS A FACTOR, WISCONSIN, 2006

Alcohol. Gordon Smith, MD (MB, ChB Otago), MPH Professor University of Maryland National Study Center for Trauma and EMS

Time to Party: A Comparative Analysis of Holiday Drinking and Driving

INJURIES, DEATHS AND COSTS RELATED TO MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES IN WHICH ALCOHOL WAS A FACTOR, WISCONSIN, 2013

II: ALCOHOL - RELATED CRASHES

36 th International Traffic Records Forum New Orleans, Louisiana. Ron Beck Cristian Oros Missouri State Highway Patrol

INJURIES, DEATHS AND COSTS RELATED TO MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES IN WHICH ALCOHOL WAS A FACTOR, WISCONSIN, 2011

ALCOHOL AND/OR DRUGS AMONG CRASH VICTIMS DYING WITHIN 12 MONTHS OF A CRASH ON A PUBLIC ROAD, BY JURISDICTION: CANADA, 2014

MORBIDITY, MORTALITY AND COSTS RELATED TO MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES IN WHICH ALCOHOL WAS A FACTOR, WISCONSIN, 2010

HOW SAFE ARE OUR ROADS?

DRINKING AND DRIVING. Alcohol consumption, even in relatively small quantities, increases the risk of road crashes.

Review of Pre-crash Behaviour in Fatal Road Collisions Report 1: Alcohol

Estimated Number and Percentage of Alcohol and Impairment- Related Crash Fatalities and Injuries, by Jurisdiction, Age and Population: Canada, 2009

Alcohol-Related Crashes Alcohol Overview

Looking Toward State Health Assessment.

IMPAIRED DRIVING ISSUES DAVID ANDRASCIK PA DUI ASSOCIATION DRUG EVALUATION AND CLASSIFICATION PROGRAM STATE COORDINATOR

INVOLVEMENT OF DRUGS IN ACCIDENT CAUSATION

Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Refresher

STOP-DWI stands for Special Traffic Options Program for Driving While Intoxicated.

stable among fatally injured drivers while drug involvement has increased in recent years.

Alcohol & Drugs. Contents:

VEHICULAR FATALITIES IN CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO, U.S.A. Twenty Years Experience ( )

Getting to Zero Alcohol- Impaired Driving Fatalities: A Comprehensive Approach to a Persistent Problem

Current New Zealand BAC Limit. BAC (mg/100ml)

BLOOD ALCOHOL LEVELS FOR FATALLY INJURED DRIVERS

Subject: The Case for a Provincial 0.00% BAC Limit for All Drivers Under the Age of 21

Alcohol involvement in pedestrian accidents in France

Drinking and Driving Laws

REVISED. Humboldt County 2007

The Impact of Helmet Use and Alcohol on Traumatic Brain Injury Related Hospitalizations for Motorcycle Crashes in Wisconsin,

DUI Arrests, BAC at the Time of Arrest and Offender Assessment Test Results for Alcohol Problems

1. Which of the following functions is affected by alcohol consumption? A. Vision B. Steering C. Attention D. All of the above

CESAR BRIEFING Underage Drinking

COLLISIONS AMONG FATALLY INJURED DRIVERS OF DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS,

Projected Percent Increase in San Diego County Population Levels by 2050

REVISED. Inyo County 2007

Marijuana and driving in the United States: prevalence, risks, and laws

Prepared by. SpotlIght. Driving Under the Influence: Students in College. Brought to you by

MISSION STATEMENT OBJECTIVE

Southeast Minnesota TZD Region Crash Data. May 1, 2014

Update on Marijuana Research. Source:

Mississippi. Data Sources:

ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM OF MARIJUANA- IMPAIRED DRIVING By Teri Moore May 2018

The Price of Injury The Burden of Injury and the Legislative Actions to Prevent Injury

South Australian Alcohol and Other Drug Strategy

Alcohol-impaired driving in the lab: Efforts to reduce the incidence of drinking and driving

Medical Marijuana Responsible for Traffic Fatalities Alfred Crancer, B.S., M.A.; Phillip Drum, Pharm.D.

BOOK YOUR Date BefORe It s too Late!

San Francisco County 2010

I. HEALTH ASSESSMENT C. HEALTH STATUS 4. BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTORS

The Role of Race/Ethnicity in Alcohol-attributable Injury in the United States

8/26/2013 DMV UCSD CHP. Presenters. Law Enforcement s Identification and Referral of Medically Impaired Older Drivers. NHTSA Priority.

Alcohol and Drug-Crash Problem in Canada 2011 Report

The Worldwide Decline in Drinking and Driving

Public Awareness and Attitudes Toward Traffic Safety Issues in Texas: 2011 Survey Results

Alcohol and Drug-Crash Problem in Canada 2012 Report

How many drunk driving deaths in 2016

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities

Alcohol Enforcement in Utah. Team Effort!

San Bernardino County 2010

Achievements in Public Health, Motor-Vehicle Safety: A 20th... Century Public Health Achievement

Getting to Zero Alcohol- Impaired Driving Fatalities: A Comprehensive Approach to a Persistent Problem. Report Release January 17, 2018

Age of Drinking Onset, Driving After Drinking, and Involvement in Alcohol Related Motor Vehicle Crashes

Driving While High: Facts and Public Attitudes

DUI Offender Survey Report 2008

Modifications to Traffic Signal Operation to Improve Safety for Alcoholaffected

Alcohol Addiction. Peer Pressure. Handling Social Pressures. Peer Pressure 2/15/2012. Alcohol's Effect on One s Health and Future.

Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety Grant to partially fund a Sober 24 program in Carson City from October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018.

Alcohol and Drug Use among Fatally Injured Pedestrians Involved in Motor Vehicle Accidents

Distracted Driving. Stephanie Bonne, MD

Driving Safely in Maryland

The Effectiveness of Drinking-and-Driving Policies in the American States: A Cross-Sectional Time Series Analysis for

Blood Alcohol Levels for Fatally Injured Drivers

Development and Analysis of a Drug and Alcohol Driving Awareness Program

Safety Is Everybody s Business

DUI Crashes and Fatalities

Evaluation of Source Investigations Demonstration Program

LIQUOR POLICY REFORM IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

Low-Manpower Checkpoints: Can They Provide Effective DUI Enforcement in Small Communities?

State Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup

The Massachusetts Report Card on Underage Drinking

Alcohol and other drug involvement in fatally injured drivers in the United States

Chapter 7 Guided Notes. Alcohol, Other Drugs and Driving. It is categorized as a because of the effects it has on the.

New Zealand Women Drinking Drivers

CCMTA Road Safety Report Series

Kerryn P Alexander, Timothy C Cave, and Max H Cameron Roads Corporation, Victoria, Australia

Recreational marijuana and collision claim frequencies

Driving at Night. It's More Dangerous

ALCOHOL and CRIME in WYOMING

Drink Driving Fast Facts Draft

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

THE NATURE OF THE ALCOHOL REDUCTION IN U.S. FATAL CRASHES IN THE 1980'S

SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ALCOHOL AND HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAMS

PUERTO RICO: SPEEDING HABITS 2015

Transcription:

The Severity of Pedestrian Injuries in -Related Collisions AUTHORS: Stanley Sciortino, PhD Elyse Chiapello San Francisco Department of Public Health Community Health Education Section The California Statewide Integrated Traffic Reporting System (SWITRS) database categorizes pedestrian injuries into four broad categories: fatal, severe, visible injury, and complaint of pain. Fatal denotes death within 30 days of the incident. For the purposes of this study, visible injury and complaint of pain were grouped together under the designation Minor Injury. DUI collisions denote those incidents in which the driver was cited for driving while intoxicated. -related refers to incidents in which the reporting officer suspected either the driver or pedestrian victim of being intoxicated, and recorded this under a had been drinking designation. The purpose of the study was to assess how much alcohol and substance use increase severity of injury among affected pedestrians and to compare the strength of such contributions. Using the two severity designations, Fatal and Minor, in which severe but not fatal injuries are excluded, odds ratios (from a multivariate analysis) were calculated for incidents involving various types of driver and pedestrian behaviors, including DUI and pedestrian intoxication. Odds ratios show the magnitude of risk for either a fatal or minor injury in each situation, relative to the baseline category of Other pedestrian violation, which is given the odds ratio of one. Report partially abstracted from: San Francisco pedestrian injury surveillance: mapping, underreporting, and injury severity in police and hospital records. Stanley Sciortino, MPH, PhD; Mary Vassar, RN, MS; Michael Radetsky, MPH; M. Margaret Knudson, MD. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2005, In Press. Funding for this study was provided in part by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, though the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency and by a New Investigators Award from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1

RESULTS: DUI Violations: Collisions that occurred when the driver was under the influence of drugs or alcohol were nearly 3 times as likely to result in fatal injury to the pedestrian when compared to incidents involving a pedestrian violation (See Figure 1, Table 1). In collisions where the driver was speeding or driving under the influence, or where the pedestrian was intoxicated, injury to the pedestrian tended to be more severe compared to incidents involving other types of traffic violations. Odds Ratio of Fatal Injury vs. Minor Injury by Type of Violation 7 Odds Ratio 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 1.7 2.8 5.4 0 Type of Violation Pedestrian Violation Speeding DUI Ped. Intoxicated From logistic model, controlling for victim age & sex, lighting, and vehicle movement. Figure 1 2

Table 1. SWITRS 1990-2003 for San Francisco Violation Category Fatal vs. Minor Odds Ratio Upper Lower Ped. right-of-way violated 0.8 (0.55, 1.12) Driver violates sign/signal 0.9 (0.50, 1.59) Driver speeding 1.7 (1.13, 2.59) Other driver violation 0.5 (0.19, 1.16) DUI 2.9 (1.53, 5.29) Pedestrian intoxicated 5.4 (3.32, 8.61) Other pedestrian violation 1 Comparison *Violation controlled by age, sex, race, lighting, vehicle movement in a multivariate logistic regression model. Pedestrians Under the Influence: Collisions involving pedestrians who were under the influence of drugs of alcohol were strongly correlated with pedestrian fatalities; in such cases, the odds of pedestrian fatality vs. minor injury were 5 times greater than for incidents involving other types of violations (See Figure 1, Table 1). However, it is likely that intoxication among pedestrians in non-fatal incidents may be underreported; while the San Francisco Office of the Chief Medical Examiner tests a high proportion of the deceased for the presence of drugs or alcohol, non-fatally injured pedestrians are infrequently tested. The San Francisco Office of the Chief Medical Examiner often tests for the presence of drugs or alcohol in the deceased. Among 66 pedestrian fatalities in 2000 and 2001, 19% were found to have drugs present in their blood. A Blood Concentration (BAC) equal to or exceeding 0.08%, the legal threshold for a DUI, was found in 12% of the victims. Additionally, three pedestrians, or 4% of the total deceased, were found to have both alcohol and drugs in their bodies (See Figure 2). 3

and Drugs: Pedestrians Under the Influence (n = 66) Drugs No 74% * 12% Not Tested 14% No Drugs 48% Drugs* 19% Not Tested 33% *Blood >.08% *Excludes Nicotine, Aspirin, or & Drugs Administered Post-Crash. Source: S.F. Medical Examiner, 2000-2001 Figure 2 All -Related Collisions: Pedestrians were more likely to die in collisions involving alcohol. Among all pedestrian fatalities, 24% were caused by incidents involving alcohol, including either DUI or intoxicated pedestrians, while among non-fatal pedestrian injuries, 11% resulted from accidents involving alcohol (See Figure 3). In collisions involving alcohol, including either DUI or intoxicated pedestrians, pedestrians were more likely to die. Pedestrian fatalities occurred in 6% of accidents involving alcohol, compared to 2% in accidents in which no alcohol was involved (See Figure 4). In collisions where alcohol was involved, including either DUI or intoxicated pedestrians, pedestrians made up 44% of all traffic fatalities (including drivers, passengers, and pedestrians) and only 17% of survivors (See Figure 5). 4

Pedestrian Fatalities and Non-Fatal Injuries in Collisions Involving 1992 through 2003 Fatal Injuries (n = 328) 24% Non-Fatal Injuries (n = 12,240) 11% No 76% No 89% Source: California Statewide Integrated Traffic Reporting System Figure 3 Pedestrian Fatalities in Collisions Involving * 1992 through 2003 Involved (n = 1382) Fatal 6% No (n = 11,186) Fatal 2% Non-Fatal 94% Non-Fatal 98% Includes Intoxicated Pedestrians Source: California Statewide Integrated Traffic Reporting System Figure 4 5

Drivers, Passengers vs. Pedestrian Survival in Collisions Involving * 1992 through 2003 % of Fatalities/Non-Fatalities 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 99 78 Fatal Pedestrians 6311 1304 Non-Fatal Driver/Passengers *Includes intoxicated pedestrians or drivers. Source: California Statewide Integrated Traffic Reporting System Figure 5 Conclusion: Motor vehicle-pedestrian collisions in which the driver is driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs present a higher likelihood that the pedestrian will be killed compared to accidents that do not involve alcohol or drugs, even those in which the driver is speeding. Collisions in which the pedestrian is intoxicated are also likely to result in a fatality, but this result may be biased. Due to thorough reporting of intoxication in fatally injured pedestrians compared with underreporting of intoxication in pedestrians who survive a collision, we don't know how often survivors were intoxicated. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the State of California, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or the Federal Highway Administration. 6