Treatment of Cardiovascular Risk Factors. Kevin M Hayes D.O. F.A.C.C. First Coast Heart and Vascular Center

Similar documents
9/29/2015. Primary Prevention of Heart Disease: Objectives. Objectives. What works? What doesn t?

Dyslipidemia in the light of Current Guidelines - Do we change our Practice?

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

ACC/AHA GUIDELINES ON LIPIDS AND PCSK9 INHIBITORS

Inflammation and and Heart Heart Disease in Women Inflammation and Heart Disease

No relevant financial relationships

Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials MANAGEMENT OF HIGH BLOOD CHOLESTEROL MANAGEMENT OF HIGH BLOOD CHOLESTEROL: IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW GUIDELINES

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

Lipid Management 2013 Statin Benefit Groups

Update on Lipid Management in Cardiovascular Disease: How to Understand and Implement the New ACC/AHA Guidelines

NEW GUIDELINES FOR CHOLESTEROL

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

9/18/2017 DISCLOSURES. Consultant: RubiconMD. Research: Amgen, NHLBI OUTLINE OBJECTIVES. Review current CV risk assessment tools.

Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials Prevention Of CVD in Women"

Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials EXPLAINING THE DECREASE IN DEATHS FROM CHD! PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN WOMEN EXPLAINING THE DECREASE IN

Introduction. Objective. Critical Questions Addressed

New Cholesterol Guidelines What the LDL are we supposed to do now?!

Observations on US CVD Prevention Guidelines. Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, MD ScM FACC FAHA

Lipid Management: The Next Level How Will the New ACC/AHA Guidelines Change My Practice

Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials

2013 Cholesterol Guidelines. Anna Broz MSN, RN, CNP, AACC Adult Certified Nurse Practitioner North Ohio Heart, Inc.

Antiplatelet Therapy in Primary CVD Prevention and Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Καρακώστας Γεώργιος Διευθυντής Καρδιολογικής Κλινικής, Γ.Ν.

Prevention of Heart Disease: The New Guidelines

Disclosures. Prevention of Heart Disease: The New Guidelines. Summary of Talk. Four guidelines. No relevant disclosures.

2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines on the Assessment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk: Overview and Commentary

Learning Objectives. Patient Case

Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute Symposium 2015

ATP IV: Predicting Guideline Updates

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Do Women Benefit From Statins for Primary Prevention?: Controversy, Challenges and Consensus

Conflict of Interest Disclosure. Learning Objectives. Learning Objectives. Guidelines. Update on Lifestyle Guidelines

Disclosures. Objectives. Cardiovascular Risk. Patient Case. JUPITER: The final frontier in statin utilization or an idea from outer space?

Financial Disclosures. Coronary Artery Calcification. Objectives. Coronary Artery Calcium 6/6/2018. Heart Disease Statistics At-a-Glace 2017

Young high risk patients the role of statins Dr. Mohamed Jeilan

2/10/2016. Perspectives on the 2013 ACC/AHA Cholesterol Guidelines. Disclosures. ATP-III Update 2004

Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials

2013 Cholesterol Guidelines. Anna Broz MSN, RN, CNP, AACC Cer=fied Adult Nurse Prac==oner North Ohio Heart, Inc.

Update on Cholesterol Management: The 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines

PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN WOMEN

Latest Guidelines for Lipid Management

How would you manage Ms. Gold

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

Lipid Panel Management Refresher Course for the Family Physician

Objectives. Background. Background. Estimating ASCVD Risk. ASCVD Major Risk Factors 2/20/2018

Disclosures No relationships (not even to an employer) No off-label uses. Cholesterol Lowering Guidelines: What now?

CLINICAL OUTCOME Vs SURROGATE MARKER

Disclosures. Overview 9/30/ ACC/AHA Guidelines on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults

Implementation of CV Risk and. Dyslipidemia Guidelines. Impact on Americans 11/25/2014. Summary Implementing new. Dyslipidemia Guidelines

Current and Future Imaging Trends in Risk Stratification for CAD

2013 Lipid Guidelines Practical Approach. Edward Goldenberg, MD FACC,FACP, FNLA Medical Director of Cardiovascular Prevention CCHS

New ACC/AHA Guidelines on Lipids: Are PCSK9 Inhibitors Poised for a Breakthrough?

Fasting or non fasting?

Statins for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Women: Review of the Evidence

David Y. Gaitonde, MD, FACP Endocrinology DDEAMC, Fort Gordon

Dyslipedemia New Guidelines

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Calculating the CVD Risk Score: Which Tool for Which Patient?

Experiences with interim trial monitoring, particularly with early stopped trials

Using Cardiovascular Risk to Guide Antihypertensive Treatment Implications For The Pre-elderly and Elderly

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Atherosclerotic Disease Risk Score

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

Cholesterol Management Roy Gandolfi, MD

Pharmacy Drug Class Review

Beyond Framingham: Risk Assessment & Treatment for Primary Prevention

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

ROLE OF INFLAMMATION IN HYPERTENSION. Dr Barasa FA Physician Cardiologist Eldoret

New Guidelines in Dyslipidemia Management

surtout qui n est PAS à risque?

4/7/ The stats on heart disease. + Deaths & Age-Adjusted Death Rates for

Current Cholesterol Guidelines and Treatment of Residual Risk COPYRIGHT. J. Peter Oettgen, MD

New Lipid Guidelines. PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN WOMEN: Implications of the New Guidelines for Hypertension and Lipids.

Lipids & Hypertension Update

EvidenceNOW SW Learning Collaborative. Kyle Knierim, MD January 2017

Modern Lipid Management:

SESSION 3 11 AM 12:30 PM

No relevant financial relationships

Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN WOMEN

Long-Term Complications of Diabetes Mellitus Macrovascular Complication

Landmark Clinical Trials.

Disclosures. Choosing a Statin/New Therapies. Case. How else would you do to treat him? LDL-C Reduction with Different Statin Strategies

Controversies in Cardiac Pharmacology

Which CVS risk reduction strategy fits better to carotid US findings?

Review current guideline recommendations for lipid-lowering therapy

The Art of Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

Hypertension in 2015: SPRINT-ing ahead of JNC-8. MAJ Charles Magee, MD MPH FACP Director, WRNMMC Hypertension Clinic

Preventing Cardiovascular Disease With Lipid Management: Matching Therapy to Risk

The Latest Generation of Clinical

Calculating Risk for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)

Lipids What s new? Meera Jain, MD Providence Portland Medical Center

Nicole Ciffone, MS, ANP-C, AACC Clinical Lipid Specialist

Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)

New Guidelines in Dyslipidemia Management

Lipid Management C. Samuel Ledford, MD Interventional Cardiology Chattanooga Heart Institute

Cardiac Screening with Electrocardiography, Stress Echocardiography, or Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

1. Which one of the following patients does not need to be screened for hyperlipidemia:

Blood Pressure LIMBO How Low To Go?

Vincent J. Caracciolo, MD FACC FOMA May 2014

Beyond LDL-Cholesterol

Transcription:

Treatment of Cardiovascular Risk Factors Kevin M Hayes D.O. F.A.C.C. First Coast Heart and Vascular Center

Disclosures: None

Objectives What do risk factors tell us What to check and when Does treatment help To statin or not to statin Future directions

Pathophysiology

Scope of the Problem 30 Prevalence of U.S. Heart Disease 25 24.6 Patients (Millions) 20 15 10 5 12.4 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Year Foot DK et al. JACC 2000;35:1067-81

Major risk factors Hypertension (high blood pressure) Tobacco use Raised blood glucose (diabetes) Physical inactivity Unhealthy diet Cholesterol/lipids Overweight and obesity

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths vs cancer deaths by age United States: 2008). Writing Group Members et al. Circulation. 2012;125:e2- e220

Estimated average 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in adults 50 to 54 years of age according to levels of various risk factors (Framingham Heart Study). Writing Group Members et al. Circulation. 2012;125:e2- e220.

Estimated 10-year stroke risk in adults 55 years of age according to levels of various risk factors (Framingham Heart Study). Writing Group Members et al. Circulation. 2012;125:e2- e220

Causes of Mortality in Patients With Diabetes

Major Risk Factors That Can t Be Modified Age Gender Heredity, including Ethnicity

Risk Calculator Age 40-79 Age Gender HDL DM Smoking Family history Race TC BP and BP Rx Smoking

2013 ACC / AHA Guideline If, after quantitative risk assessment, a riskbased treatment decision is uncertain, assessment of 1 or more of the following family history, hs-crp, CAC score, or ABI may be considered to inform treatment decision making.

Recommendations 2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American heart Association (AHA) found that: CAC screening should not be used in asymptomatic low or high 10-year CHD risk patients according to Framingham criteria. CAC screening is useful for intermediate 10-year CHD risk (10-20%) according to Framingham criteria. If the CAC core is elevated (>400), no further testing is indicated at this time. A low CAC (<100) effectively excludes obstructive CAD in outpatients with atypical chest pain and ER patients with chest pain; however, stress testing is preferred since it gives a clue of exercise capacity. There is no current evidence that treatment decisions based on CAC scores leads to outcome improvement.

2013 ACC AHA Expert Opinion Thresholds for use of Optional Screening Tests When Risk-Based Decisions Regarding Initiation of Pharmacological Therapy are Uncertain Following Quantitative Risk Assessment Measure Support Revising Risk Assessment Upward Do Not Support Revising Risk Assessment Family history of premature CVD Male <55 years of age Female <65 years of age hs-crp 2 mg/l CAC score 300 Agatston units or 75th percentile for age, sex, and ethnicity* ABI <0.9

Calculator www.cvriskcalculator.com

ASA RBCs Endothelial cells ADP Collagen Thrombin Epinephrine Tx A 2 Serotonin Ca ++ AA release COX PGG 2 -PGH 2 Tx Syn Tx A 2 ASA Tx A 2

There have been 9 primary prevention trials evaluating the role of aspirin in CVD. Not a single trial has been positive so far. When the data are pooled together in a meta-analysis, there is a small, but statistically significant, benefit which is counterbalanced by an equally small but statistically significant risk of bleeding. On balance, the totality of evidence does not yield a favorable benefit-risk ratio for aspirin in primary prevention

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends that men with no history of heart disease or stroke aged 45-79 years use aspirin to prevent myocardial infarctions and that women with no history of heart disease or stroke aged 55-79 use aspirin to prevent stroke when the benefit of aspirin use outweighs the potential harm of gastrointestinal hemorrhage or other serious bleeding.

What to do? Statin or no statin

Ridker et al, Circulation 2003;108:2292-2297. JUPITER Trial Design JUPITER Multi-National Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Rosuvastatin in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events Among Individuals With Low LDL and Elevated hscrp No Prior CVD or DM Men >50, Women >60 LDL <130 mg/dl hscrp >2 mg/l 4-week run-in Rosuvastatin 20 mg (N=8901) Placebo (N=8901) MI Stroke Unstable Angina CVD Death CABG/PTCA

JUPITER Primary Trial Endpoint : MI, Stroke, UA/Revascularization, CV Death Ridker et al NEJM 2008 Cumulative Incidence 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46-0.69 P < 0.00001 0 1 2 3 4 Placebo 251 / 8901-44 % Rosuvastatin 142 / 8901 Number at Risk Rosuvastatin Placebo Follow-up (years) 8,901 8,631 8,412 6,540 3,893 1,958 1,353 983 544 157 8,901 8,621 8,353 6,508 3,872 1,963 1,333 955 534 174

Statins - Most benefit Four Statin Benefit Groups: Individuals with clinical ASCVD (acute coronary syndromes, or a history of MI, stable or unstable angina, coronary or other arterial revascularization, stroke, TIA, or peripheral arterial disease presumed to be of atherosclerotic origin ) without New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV heart failure or receiving hemodialysis. Individuals with primary elevations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 190 mg/dl. Individuals 40-75 years of age with diabetes, and LDL-C 70-189 mg/dl without clinical ASCVD. Individuals without clinical ASCVD or diabetes, who are 40-75 years of age with LDL-C 70-189 mg/dl, and have an estimated 10-year ASCVD risk of 7.5% or higher.

Primary prevention ---- Class 1 1. The Pooled Cohort Equations should be used to estimate 10-year ASCVD risk for individuals with LDL C 70 to 189 mg/dl without clinical ASCVD* to guide initiation of statin therapy for the primary prevention of ASCVD.(Level of Evidence: B)" "2. Adults 40 to 75 years of age with LDL C 70 to 189 mg/dl, without clinical ASCVD or diabetes and an estimated 10-year ASCV risk 7.5% should be treated with moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy.(level of Evidence: A)"

Primary prevention --- Class IIa 1. It is reasonable to offer treatment with a moderate-intensity statin to adults 40 to 75 years of age, with LDL C 70 to 189 mg/dl, without clinical ASCVD* or diabetes and an estimated 10-year ASCVD risk of 5% to <7.5%.(Level of Evidence: B)" "2. Before initiating statin therapy for the primary prevention of ASCVD in adults with LDL C 70 to 189 mg/dl without clinical ASCVD or diabetes it is reasonable for clinicians and patients to engage in a discussion which considers the potential for ASCVD risk reduction benefits and for adverse effects, for drug-drug interactions, and patient preferences for treatment.(level of Evidence: C)"

Non drug Tx Stopping smoking ( Chantix, Patch, Gum) Exercise Weight loss STAMPEED data gastric surgery

Exercise Recommendations to improve lipids with physical activity were also provided. This included regular aerobic physical activity, 3-4 sessions a week, lasting on average 40 minutes per session, and involving moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity. This level of physical activity can reduce both LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Advise adults with a BMI 40 or BMI 35 with obesityrelated comorbid conditions who are motivated to lose weight and who have not responded to behavioral treatment with or without pharmacotherapy with sufficient weight loss to achieve targeted health outcome goals that bariatric surgery may be an appropriate option to improve health and offer referral to an experienced bariatric surgeon for consultation and evaluation. A (Strong)

Thank you