Genetics and the prevention of CAD

Similar documents
Diastolic Heart Failure

1. Which one of the following patients does not need to be screened for hyperlipidemia:

DIFFERENTIATING THE PATIENT WITH UNDIFFERENTIATED CHEST PAIN

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Assessing Cardiovascular Risk to Optimally Stratify Low- and Moderate- Risk Patients. Copyright. Not for Sale or Commercial Distribution

Summary HTA. HTA-Report Summary

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Is Lower Better for LDL or is there a Sweet Spot

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

Fasting or non fasting?

LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular outcomes?

Best Lipid Treatments

The Changing Epidemiology of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Implications for practice: Dr. Sonia Anand, McMaster University

Weintraub, W et al NEJM March Khot, UN et al, JAMA 2003

New Paradigms in Predicting CVD Risk

9/29/2015. Primary Prevention of Heart Disease: Objectives. Objectives. What works? What doesn t?

Dyslipidemia in women: Who should be treated and how?

Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic and clinical studies

How would you manage Ms. Gold

Preclinical Detection of CAD: Is it worth the effort? Michael H. Crawford, MD

Do Women Benefit From Statins for Primary Prevention?: Controversy, Challenges and Consensus

4/7/ The stats on heart disease. + Deaths & Age-Adjusted Death Rates for

Inflammation as A Target for Therapy. Focus on Residual Inflammatory Risk

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

Small dense low-density lipoprotein is a risk for coronary artery disease in an urban Japanese cohort: The Suita study

JAMA. 2011;305(24): Nora A. Kalagi, MSc

Cardiovascular disease and diabetes Vascular harmony

Genetics of Arterial and Venous Thrombosis: Clinical Aspects and a Look to the Future

STEMI Care 2014 at the Crossroads: Taking the right road

CRP for the Clinician

Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Current Knowledge, Future Directions

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient F. Mut, J. Vitola

GALECTIN-3 PREDICTS LONG TERM CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN HIGH-RISK CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS

Coronary Heart Disease in Women Go Red for Women

Dyslipidemia in the light of Current Guidelines - Do we change our Practice?

LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

A Mendelian Randomized Controlled Trial of Long Term Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Beginning Early in Life

Cholesterol Management Roy Gandolfi, MD

A Naturally Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Genetic Variants that Mimic CETP Inhibitors and Statins on the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.

Treatment of Cardiovascular Risk Factors. Kevin M Hayes D.O. F.A.C.C. First Coast Heart and Vascular Center

EMBARGO: 08:30 Central European Summer Time Tuesday 29th August 2017

Statins in the elderly : Is there a rationale?

Do Clinical Practice Guidelines Improve Outcomes?

Long-term prognostic value of N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) changes within one year in patients with coronary heart disease

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

Effects of a Decision Aid and Additional Decisional Counseling on Cardiac Risk Reduction Behavior and Health Outcomes

Hyperlipidemia in an Otherwise Healthy 80 Year-Old Patient. Theodore D Fraker, Jr, MD Professor of Medicine

High Sensitivity Troponin Improves Management. But Not Yet

Confounding and Interaction

9/3/ AHA/ACC Lipid Guidelines on the Treatment of Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerosis. Disclosure

Jackson Distinguished Professor of Clinical Medicine, Harvard Medical School

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

Andrew Cohen, MD and Neil S. Skolnik, MD INTRODUCTION

AHA Clinical Science Special Report: November 10, 2015

Acute Coronary Syndromes: Different Continents, Different Guidelines?

CS2220 Introduction to Computational Biology

Modern Lipid Management:

SISCR Module 7 Part I: Introduction Basic Concepts for Binary Biomarkers (Classifiers) and Continuous Biomarkers

Disclosures No relationships (not even to an employer) No off-label uses. Cholesterol Lowering Guidelines: What now?

Cardiac CT for Risk Assessment: Do we need to look beyond Coronary Artery Calcification

Cholesterol Reduction Therapy in 2018 A Perspective Role Of Statins, Ezetimibe and PCSK9-Inhibitors

Unnecessary hospitalisation and investigation of low risk patients presenting to hospital with chest pain

Update on Lipid Management in Cardiovascular Disease: How to Understand and Implement the New ACC/AHA Guidelines

Prevention of Heart Disease: The New Guidelines

Using Cardiovascular Risk to Guide Antihypertensive Treatment Implications For The Pre-elderly and Elderly

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE General practice Indicators for the NICE menu

GUIDELINES FOR DYSLIPIDEMIA MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION THROUGH NOVA SCOTIA DIABETES CENTRES

The Gender Divide Women, Men and Heart Disease February 2017

40% minimum reduction from

Women s Heart Health: Risk, Diagnosis and Management Differences MANAGEMENT

Calcium scoring Clinical and prognostic value

CLINICAL OUTCOME Vs SURROGATE MARKER

MEDCODE READCODE READTERM

2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines on the Assessment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk: Overview and Commentary

Regence. Medical Policy Manual. Date of Origin: May Topic: Genetic Testing for Lipoprotein(a) Variant(s) as a Decision Aid for Aspirin Treatment

Current Cholesterol Guidelines and Treatment of Residual Risk COPYRIGHT. J. Peter Oettgen, MD

Felix Vallotton Ball (1899) LDL-C management in Asian diabetes: moderate vs. high intensity statin --- a lesson from EMPATHY study

Subclinical atherosclerosis in CVD: Risk stratification & management Raul Santos, MD

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Modulators

AIM HIGH for SATURN and stay SHARP; COURAGE (v1.5)

Lifetime clinical and economic benefits of statin-based LDL lowering in the 20-year Followup of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study

CONTRIBUTING FACTORS FOR STROKE:

FACT SHEET 53. What is inherited predisposition to cardiovascular disease?

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

Overcoming the Risk-Treatment Paradox in Non-STE ACS: It s Time! Christopher Granger, MD

Revascularization in Severe LV Dysfunction: The Role of Inducible Ischemia and Viability Testing

How to Reduce Residual Risk in Primary Prevention

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

HDL-C. J Jpn Coll Angiol, 2008, 48: NIPPON DATA80, MEGA study, JELIS, dyslipidemia, risk assessment chart

Should we treat everybody over 60 years with a statin? Comprehensive primary prevention in practice

Guideline for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults. Learn and Live SM. ACCF/AHA Pocket Guideline

Disclosures. Prevention of Heart Disease: The New Guidelines. Summary of Talk. Four guidelines. No relevant disclosures.

Sudden death as co-morbidity in patients following vascular intervention

Learning Objectives. Predicting and Preventing Cardiovascular Disease. ACC/AHA Cholesterol Guidelines Key differences vs ATP III

Understanding new international guidelines to tackle CV Risk: A practical model John Deanfield, MD UCL, London United Kingdom s

2/20/2013. Why use imaging in CV prevention? Update on coronary CTA in 2013 Coronary CTA for 1 0 prevention: pros and cons Are we there yet?

INTERNATIONAL LIPOPROTEIN STANDARDIZATION FORUM Fasting Time and Lipid Levels in a Community-Based Population: A Crosssectional

Transcription:

Genetics and the prevention of CAD Presented by: Robert Roberts, MD, FRCPC, MACC, FAHA, FRSC Professor and Departmental Chair ISCTR University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix Past President and CEO, University of Ottawa Heart Institute Founding Director, Ruddy Canadian Cardiovascular Genetics Centre Scientist Emeritus and Advisor, University of Ottawa Heart Institute No Disclosures

Genetics of Coronary Artery Disease GENETIC PREDISPOSITION 50% of susceptibility to CAD is genetic 10% of CAD occurs before the age of 50, with genetic predisposition being the predominate risk factor in this subgroup Lloyd Jones et al. JAMA 2004;(291)2204-11 Maremberg et al. NEJM. 1994;(330)1041-46

GENETICS OF CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AND MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION 50 genetic risk variants for CAD of genome-wide significance have been identified and replicated in independent populations Nature Genetics Jan 2013;Vol.45

GENETIC VARIANTS OF CAD Genome Wide Significant p- value 0.00000005 (5x10-8 ) Nature Genetics Jan 2013;Vol.45

CARDIoGRAMplusC4D Discovery Population: 194,527 Replication Population: 15,613 TOTAL : 210,140 Nature Genetics 2013 Jan;45(1):25-33

Common Genetic risk Variants for Coronary Artery Disease 1. Genetic variants for CAD occur commonly. 50% occur in over 50% of the population 30% occur in over 75% of the population 2. Each genetic risk variant exerts minimal risk averaging about 17% relative risk Roberts, Circ Res. 2014 Jun 6;114(12):1890-903

IMPORTANT IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE PREVENTION AND THERAPY 35 of the 50 genetic variants predisposing to CAD mediate their risk through UNKNOWN risk factors Roberts, Circ Res. 2014 Jun 6;114(12):1890-903

Percent of Population Distribution of Genetic Risk Variants Associated with CAD Ottawa Heart Genomic Study (n=14,495) Cases Controls Genetic Risk Score (cgrs) based on 21 genetic variants Roberts, Circ Res. 2014 Jun 6;114(12):1890-903

GENETIC RISK OF CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AND MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION Risk for CAD is proportional to the number of genetic risk variants, rather than the risk of a specific variant Nature Genetics Jan 2013;Vol.45

Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease HYPOTHESIS: The Comprehensive prevention of CAD will require treatment of genetic risk factors in addition to conventional risk factors

CLINICAL APPLICATION OF GENETIC VARIANTS FOR CAD In this study 27 of the known genetic variants for CAD were genotyped and analyzed in a sample size of 48,421 selected from clinical trials

CLINICAL APPLICATION OF GENETIC VARIANTS FOR CAD Population Genotyped Primary prevention clinical trial JUPITER ASCOT Secondary prevention clinical trial CARE PROVE-IT-TIMI 22 Community cohort Malmo diet and cancer study

The 27 Known Genetic Risk Variants for CAD selected for this study

CLINICAL APPLICATION OF GENETIC RISK VARIANTS FOR CAD TO PREDICT CARDIAC EVENTS OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the 27 genetic risk variants, after adjusting for traditional risk factors, would further risk stratify for CAD events

CLINICAL APPLICATION OF GENETIC RISK VARIANTS FOR CAD TO PREDICT CARDIAC EVENTS Traditional risk factors adjusted for in the analysis: Age Sex Smoking Hypertension FAMILY HISTORY HDL and LDL cholesterol Diabetes Race

ESTIMATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL GENETIC RISK SCORE Sum of the number of Risk alleles for CAD inherited by the individual weighted by the log of the odds ratio

GENETIC RISK VARIANTS IMPROVE STRATIFICATION FOR CARDIAC EVENTS

GENETIC RISK VARIANTS FOR CAD ARE INDEPENDENT PREDICTORS OF CARDIAC EVENTS Genetic Stratification of the Jupiter Clinical Trial Genetic Score Odds Ratio Low risk 1.00 Intermediate risk 1.30 High risk 1.70

GENETIC RISK VARIANTS ARE INDEPENDENT PREDICTORS OF CAD EVENTS AND THE RESPONSE TO STATIN THERAPY Genetic Score Reduction in Events (Statins) Low risk 34% Intermediate risk 32% High risk 50%

GENETIC RISK VARIANTS PREDICT RESPONSE TO STATIN THERAPY IN EACH RISK GROUP

GENETIC RISK VARIANTS CAN BE USED TO SELECT CAD CANDIDATES WHO WILL RECEIVE THE GREATEST THERAPEUTIC BENEFIT Genetic Score Prevention of Primary Event (number to treat) Low risk 66 Intermediate risk 42 High risk 25

GENETIC RISK VARIANTS ARE INDEPENDENT PREDICTORS OF CAD EVENTS WITH THERAPEUTIC IMPLICATIONS In the primary prevention trials there was roughly a threefold difference between the low and high genetic risk groups for the number of patients needed to be treated to prevent one CAD event

GENETIC RISK VARIANTS ARE INDEPENDENT PREDICTORS OF CAD EVENTS WITH THERAPEUTIC IMPLICATIONS Genetic Score Prevention of Secondary Event (number of patients to treat) Low risk 57 Intermediate risk 42 High risk 20

GENETIC RISK VARIANTS ARE INDEPENDENT PREDICTORS OF CAD EVENTS AND THE RESPONSE TO STATIN THERAPY 1% absolute risk reduction by statin therapy is associated with a significant gradient when stratified for Genetic Risk: Genetic Risk Group Absolute Risk Reduction High risk group 1.71% Intermediate risk group 0.71% Low risk group 0.29%

GENETIC RISK VARIANTS ARE INDEPENDENT PREDICTORS OF CAD EVENTS AND THE RESPONSE TO STATIN THERAPY Genetic risk variants for CAD predict primary and secondary events independent of traditional risk factors Genetic variants provide further stratification for risk over and above traditional risk factors Genetic risk variants for CAD can identify on an individual basis, those with the greatest response to statin therapy.

Advantage of Genetic Variants over Conventional Biomarkers ONE venipuncture per lifetime since one s DNA does not change over one s lifetime Roberts, Circ Res. 2014 Jun 6;114(12):1890-903

Advantage of Genetic Variants over Conventional Biomarkers Genetic Risk for CAD is the Same at Birth as at Death so can be used to select candidates for Primary Prevention Roberts, Circ Res. 2014 Jun 6;114(12):1890-903

I would like to express my appreciation to all the collaborating Investigators associated with CARDIoGRAMplusC4D

DR. RUTH MCPHERSON S LABORATORY DR. GEORGE WELLS STATISTICAL METHODS CENTRE RUDDY CANADIAN CARDIOVASCULAR GENETICS CENTRE GENETICS GROUP DR. ALEX STEWART S LABORATORY

Acknowledgements Robert Roberts, MD, FRCPC, MACC GRANT SUPPORT The Canadian Institutes of Health Research, CIHR #MOP82810 The Canada Foundation for Innovation, CFI #11966