UNIT 6. DEVELOPING THREAT/HAZARD-SPECIFIC ANNEXES

Similar documents
Assessment Field Activity Collaborative Assessment, Planning, and Support: Safety and Risk in Teams

H1N1 Influenza 09 Guidance for Residential Aged Care

Frequently asked questions: Influenza A (H1N1)v

A pre-conference should include the following: an introduction, a discussion based on the review of lesson materials, and a summary of next steps.

US Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guidelines for PrEP

ACSQHC National Consensus Statement: Essential Elements for High Quality End-oflife Care in Acute Hospitals.

PILI Ohana Facilitator s Guide

Key Points Enterovirus D68 in the United States, 2014 Note: Newly added information is in red.

Essential Records Management 2016 Minnesota Municipal Clerks Conference

17831 Murdock Circle Port Charlotte, FL Information: or

Appendix C. Master of Public Health. Practicum Guidelines

Building Community Resiliency: Ensuring Emergency Preparedness Medical Library Association Marriott Inner Harbor October 10, 2007 Baltimore, MD

Pandemic H1N1 2009: DrillSafe Update. David Blizzard BD Manager, Energy Mining and Infrastructure

Swindon Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Bulletin

Key Points Enterovirus D68 in the United States, 2014 Note: Newly added information is in red.

1100 Marie Mount Hall College Park, Maryland Tel: (301) Fax: (301)

Welcome! You will also learn about Deaf culture and Deaf history. What will we study?

The Mental Capacity Act 2005; a short guide for the carers and relatives of those who may need support. Ian Burgess MCA Lead 13 February 2017

Hospital Preparedness Checklist

Individual Assessments for Couples Treatment with HFCA

GSB of EDA Meeting Minutes

Module 6: Goal Setting

Reliability and Validity Plan 2017

WHAT IS HEAD AND NECK CANCER FACT SHEET

HOSA 105 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Who is eligible for LifeCare? What services are available?

DATA RELEASE: UPDATED PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ON 2016 HEALTH & LIFESTYLE SURVEY ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE QUESTIONS

Examining the use and effectiveness of Elder Abuse Protocols: a Western Australian case study

Recommendations for Risk Management at Swine Exhibitions and for Show Pigs August 2012

A Phase I Study of CEP-701 in Patients with Refractory Neuroblastoma NANT (01-03) A New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy (NANT) treatment protocol.

Interpretation. Historical enquiry religious diversity

H1 N1 Action Steps for Parents to Protect Your Child and Family from the Flu this School Year

Influenza (Flu) Fact Sheet

Assessment criteria for Primary Health Disciplines Eligibility for Recognition as Credentialled Diabetes Educator. December 2015 ADEA

Corporate Governance Code for Funds: What Will it Mean?

AP Biology Lab 12: Introduction to the Scientific Method and Animal Behavior

Section 6 Students School District No. 71 (Comox Valley)

Code of employment practice on infant feeding

CDC Influenza Division Key Points MMWR Updates February 20, 2014

Behaviour Management: Some Ideas revisited

Vaccine Information Statement: PNEUMOCOCCAL CONJUGATE VACCINE

Immunisation and Disease Prevention Policy

PET FORM Planning and Evaluation Tracking ( Assessment Period)

PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS NOTICE PARENTAL RIGHTS FOR PRIVATE SCHOOL SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

TASKFORCE REPORT AIMS TO BOOST CANCER SURVIVAL AND TRANSFORM PATIENT EXPERIENCE

Pain relief after surgery

This standard operating procedure applies to stop smoking services provided by North 51.

77 WHO/IPA workshop on Immunisation

Little Angels Schoolhouse

Approaches to the Care and Support of Individuals with Dementia

Vaccine Information Statement: LIVE INTRANASAL INFLUENZA VACCINE

Meeting the Nutritional Requirements of Individuals with Dementia

Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA)

Pandemic Flu Response

Alcohol & Substance Misuse Policy. St Mary s CE Academy Trading Company. Date: Spring 2017 Date of Next Review: Summer 2018

Guidance for Applicants to the Global fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria Round 8 Call for proposals 28 February 2008

British Sign Language (BSL) Plan October 2018 Scottish Charity Regulator

CONSENT FOR KYBELLA INJECTABLE FAT REDUCTION

SUFFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL. Anti- Social Behaviour Act Penalty Notice. Code of conduct

EDPS 475: Instructional Objectives for Midterm Exam Behaviorism

Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

UNIT 2: mapping bananas

Annual Principal Investigator Worksheet About Local Context

Health Consumers Queensland submission

Preventing Suicide: Review of Safety Protocol for Suicidal Students. Maureen Cooper Jamie Anderson

True Patient & Partner Engagement How is it done? How can I do it?

All meetings and events held by, or on behalf of ESN Agder All ESN-related online activity All external representation of ESN and ESN Agder

FTD RESEARCH: The Value of Studies and Opportunities for Involvement

Code of Conduct for Employees

Structured Assessment using Multiple Patient. Scenarios (StAMPS) Exam Information

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR ENROLLING SUBJECTS WHO DO NOT SPEAK ENGLISH

Breast Cancer Awareness Month 2018 Key Messages (as of June 6, 2018)

Implementation of G6PD testing and radical cure in P. vivax endemic countries: considerations

Suicide Postvention. Ellie Martinez, M.A. Stephen E. Brock, Ph.D, NCSP. Suggested Procedures During the Aftermath of a Student Suicide

Dysart Unified School District

HDFS 294/HCD 598 Practicum at the Autism Program (TAP) Resource Center Spring 2017

Food Stamp Program Pandemic Flu Planning

Success Criteria: Extend your thinking:

2017 PEPFAR Data and Systems Applied Learning Summit Day 2: MER Analytics/Available Visualizations, Clinical Cascade Breakout Session TB/HIV EXERCISE

Castilion Primary School. Spiritual Moral Social and Cultural Education Policy

Memory Screening Site s PROGRAM HANDBOOK

DRAFT EMEA PANDEMIC INFLUENZA CRISIS MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE EVALUATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PANDEMIC INFLUENZA VACCINES AND ANTIVIRALS

Bariatric Surgery FAQs for Employees in the GRMC Group Health Plan

FDA Dietary Supplement cgmp

The estimator, X, is unbiased and, if one assumes that the variance of X7 is constant from week to week, then the variance of X7 is given by

Campus Climate Survey

Statement of Work for Linked Data Consulting Services

during Last Days of Life

Session 5: Is FOOD fair?

Reportable Incident Decision Process

FOLLOW-UP IN-DEPTH INTERVIEW GUIDELINES

Name: Anchana Ganesh Age: 21 years Home Town: Chennai, Tamil Nadu Degree: B.Com. Profilometer Score. Profilometer Graph

Human papillomavirus (HPV) refers to a group of more than 150 related viruses.

Introduction Teaching Interpretation

Practicum Evaluation Form - Formative Assessment

Career Confidence. by Kevin Gaw

EASTERN ARIZONA COLLEGE Criminal Investigation

Public consultation on the NHMRC s draft revised Australian alcohol guidelines for low-risk drinking

International Experts Meeting on Severe Accident Management in the Light of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

The principles of evidence-based medicine

Transcription:

UNIT 6. DEVELOPING THREAT/HAZARD-SPECIFIC ANNEXES

This page intentinally left blank.

UNIT INTRODUCTION Visual 6.1 This unit presents infrmatin n annexes that shuld be included in a schl emergency peratins plan (EOP) that fcus n specific types f threats, hazards, and incidents. Nvember 2013 Student Manual Page 6.1

UNIT INTRODUCTION Visual 6.2 The unit bjectives are t enable yu t: State the elements included in threat/hazard-specific annexes. Develp r update threat/hazard-specific annexes. Bth the imprtance f and the challenges faced in develping and implementing threat/hazardspecific prcedures are great. Example #1: In March 2007, a deadly trnad hit a high schl in Alabama. Officials at the schl had first planned n evacuating the schl in respnse t the severe weather warnings. After learning f an appraching trnad, they decided t keep the students inside the schl. Students mved t the interir f the schl. Minutes later, a trnad struck the schl, ripping ff the rf and cllapsing walls. Eight students were killed. Althugh the schl and gvernment fficials faced heavy criticism frm the cmmunity fr the decisin t remain at the schl, sme said the death tll wuld have been far greater if the students had been utside, lining up fr schl buses, when the trnad hit. Example #2: A 43-year-ld man, wearing a hded jacket and carrying a backpack, walked int a high schl with a grup f students. He entered a classrm and tk seven female students hstage fr several hurs. Thrugh hstage negtiatins five students were released safely. After several hurs f n cmmunicatin with the gunman, the tactical team frcefully entered the classrm. One student escaped safely while the ther was sht and died an hur later. Page 6.2 Student Manual Nvember 2013

UNIT INTRODUCTION Visual 6.2 (Cntinued) Althugh the schl district had cnducted an active shter drill several weeks befre the incident, they still identified several lessns learned based n the actual incident including addressing mental health needs, incrprating NIMS principles int the respnse, addressing cmmunicatin interperability, and cnsidering student and staff access and functinal needs. Nvember 2013 Student Manual Page 6.3

UNIT INTRODUCTION Visual 6.3 Earlier units in this curse described the first five steps in the CPG 101 planning prcess: frming the planning team, understanding the situatin, determining gals and bjectives, plan develpment, and plan preparatin, review, and apprval. This unit cntinues with step 5 f the prcess, fcusing n threat/hazard-specific annexes. Page 6.4 Student Manual Nvember 2013

DEVELOPING THREAT/HAZARD-SPECIFIC ANNEXES Visual 6.4 Unit 3 presented the imprtance f cnducting assessments t identify threats and hazards in rder t develp a cmprehensive schl EOP. The prcess f develping threat/hazardspecific annexes builds n the infrmatin frm the different schl assessments. In rder t prperly develp threat/hazard-specific annexes, the planning team: Reviews the infrmatin gathered frm the schl s threat and hazard assessments. Cnsiders what infrmatin is already included in any functinal annexes that have been develped. Identifies any gaps in the infrmatin prvided. Develps necessary threat/hazard-specific annexes. Nvember 2013 Student Manual Page 6.5

DEVELOPING THREAT/HAZARD-SPECIFIC ANNEXES Visual 6.5 In develping threat- and hazard-specific annexes, the cre planning team, wrking in cnjunctin with relevant subject-matter experts n the expanded team, shuld: Identify types f threat and hazard incidents that will require unique prcedures within the schl EOP. Identify the title, gal, bjective, and curses f actin (including respnsibilities, cmmunicatin, and specific actins). Prvide a brief summary f hw the critical peratinal functins will be incrprated int the threat- r hazard-specific annex. Test and refine the prcedures. Apprve and disseminate the prcedures. Page 6.6 Student Manual Nvember 2013

DEVELOPING THREAT/HAZARD-SPECIFIC ANNEXES Visual 6.6 The number and types f threat- and hazard-specific annexes included in the schl EOP shuld be based n the results f yur security assessments and the identificatin f threats and hazards f greatest cncern. Nt every threat r hazard requires an annex! Select thse that present unique challenges r unique prcedures, rles, r respnsibilities. Create a threat- r hazard-specific annex nly if the given challenges are nt sufficiently addressed in the basic plan r functinal annexes. Therefre, the schl EOP may nt include a great number f threat r hazard annexes. If there is a functinal annex that applies t ne f the threat r hazard annexes, the threat r hazard annex shuld include it by reference. Fr example, if a curse f actin fr a fire hazard invlves evacuatin and there is an evacuatin functinal annex, the Fire Threat Annex wuld indicate see Evacuatin Annex in the Fire Annex curse f actin sectin, rather than repeat the evacuatin curses f actin in the Fire Annex. Dn t repeat infrmatin presented in the basic plan r functinal annexes. Repeating infrmatin is nt advisable fr the fllwing reasns: Schl staff and students shuld learn and exercise simple prcedures that apply t all threats and hazards. The threat and hazard annexes shuld present nly unique infrmatin. Repeating prcedures increases the pssibility that there will be incnsistencies in prcedures that culd lead t cnfusin during an incident. The schl EOP becmes larger and mre difficult fr users t cmprehend. Nvember 2013 Student Manual Page 6.7

DEVELOPING THREAT/HAZARD-SPECIFIC ANNEXES Visual 6.6 (Cntinued) Examples f threat/hazard-specific annexes in a schl EOP include: Hurricane/Severe Strm Earthquake Trnad Hazardus Materials Incident Mass Casualty Active Shter Pandemic/Disease Outbreak (Nte: This is nt a cmplete list. Planning teams must define annexes n the basis f their hazard/threat and security assessment.) Page 6.8 Student Manual Nvember 2013

DEVELOPING THREAT/HAZARD-SPECIFIC ANNEXES Visual 6.7 When develping yur threat/hazard-specific annexes: Summarize where and hw hazards are likely t impact the schl. The hazards may be: Natural (e.g., earthquake, fld, hazardus weather, public health emergency). Technlgical (e.g., infrastructure/utility disruptin, radilgical, r hazardus material release). Human-caused (e.g., criminal r vilent behavir, intruder, demnstratin, active shter, terrrism). Fcus n the planning, mitigatin, and respnse needs fr a given hazard. This includes any prvisins and prtcls fr warning the public and disseminating emergency public infrmatin. Include: Infrmatin n legal requirements as directed by specific lcal, State, and Federal laws. Supprting dcuments as needed t clarify cntents f the basic plan. Fr example, in the case f a terrrist incident the lead agency natinwide is the Federal Bureau f Investigatin. There may be State laws gverning respnse authrities fr certain types f incidents. It is imprtant t cnsult legal cunsel r research State laws when develping threat/hazard-specific annexes. Nvember 2013 Student Manual Page 6.9

DEVELOPING THREAT/HAZARD-SPECIFIC ANNEXES Visual 6.8 Nw that yu knw what shuld be included in a threat/hazard-specific annex, lk at sme examples f hazards that yu may want t include. While peple may think f trnades r wildfires as natural hazards, pandemic disease such as influenza is als a natural hazard and yu may want t include prcedures in yur schl EOP t address the pandemic flu. Depending n the viral strain, the ppulatin may have little t n immunity t a flu virus. In these cases, influenza may: Cause serius illness. Spread easily frm persn t persn. Sweep acrss the cuntry and arund the wrld in a very shrt time. Page 6.10 Student Manual Nvember 2013

DEVELOPING THREAT/HAZARD-SPECIFIC ANNEXES Visual 6.8 (Cntinued) The CDC advcates simple actins that everyne can d t stay healthy, including: Cvering yur nse and muth with a tissue when yu cugh r sneeze. Washing yur hands ften with sap and water, especially after yu cugh r sneeze. Aviding tuching yur eyes, nse, r muth. Staying hme if yu get sick. The CDC als recmmends that peple with the flu shuld stay at hme until 24 hurs after the fever is gne. Other peple in their husehld shuld als, t the degree pssible, minimize utside cntact during this time. State and lcal health agencies may have different recmmendatins, depending n the risk t lcal cmmunities. A schl shuld take these recmmendatins int accunt when develping the respnse prcedures fr a flu utbreak. The Centers fr Disease Cntrl and Preventin (CDC) has develped recmmended actins t take fr each schl year. Check the CDC Web site (http://www.cdc.gv), search tpic: schl health. Nvember 2013 Student Manual Page 6.11

DEVELOPING THREAT/HAZARD-SPECIFIC ANNEXES Visual 6.9 Schls may als want t include a threat/hazard-specific annex n schl vilence. Schl vilence: Can be directed at students r faculty/staff. Includes bullying, cyberbullying, slapping, punching, weapn use, and sexual assault. May invlve ne r mre schls, as in gang vilence and inter-schl rivalries. Page 6.12 Student Manual Nvember 2013

DEVELOPING THREAT/HAZARD-SPECIFIC ANNEXES Visual 6.10 The Sample Schl EOP includes threat/hazard-specific annexes related t natural (fld, pandemic), technlgical (hazardus materials), and human-caused (active shter) threats and hazards. Nvember 2013 Student Manual Page 6.13

PLAN REVIEW SESSION Visual 6.11 Purpse: This activity will enable yu t review and further develp yur schl EOP. Instructins: Wrking as a schl team r individually: 1. Review the threat/hazard-specific annexes in yur schl EOP, the sample plan (if prvided), and the Threat/Hazard-Specific Annex Cntent Guide that fllws. Are any annexes repetitive r unnecessary? Determine if the threat/hazard-specific annexes include: The schl s specific cncerns, capabilities, and resurces. Respnsibilities (principal s actins, staff/faculty actins, etc.). Critical peratinal functins r prcedures fr respnding t this hazard. 2. Are there additinal prcedures and/r threat/hazard-specific annexes yu need t develp? Page 6.14 Student Manual Nvember 2013

PLAN REVIEW SESSION Visual 6.11 (Cntinued) 3. Update yur EOP. Remember that yu d nt need t repeat infrmatin cntained elsewhere in the plan. Use yur instructr and the Sample Schl EOP as resurces! Nvember 2013 Student Manual Page 6.15

UNIT SUMMARY Visual 6.12 In this unit, the fllwing key pints were presented: Threat/hazard-specific annexes: Build n threat, hazard, and vulnerability identificatin and assessments. Describe emergency respnse strategies fr a specific threat, hazard, r incident. Prvide infrmatin unique t that threat, hazard, r incident and shuld nt repeat infrmatin cntained elsewhere in the schl EOP. Useful tlkit resurces related t this unit are prvided in the Threat/Hazard-Specific Prcedures sectin under Develping Plans and Prcedures. Unit 7 describes cnsideratins fr training and exercising the prcedures in the schl EOP. Page 6.16 Student Manual Nvember 2013