Nuclear Perfusion Imaging of Angina

Similar documents
Radiologic Assessment of Myocardial Viability

Fundamentals of Nuclear Cardiology. Terrence Ruddy, MD, FRCPC, FACC

SPECT TRACERS Tl-201, Tc-99m Sestamibi, Tc-99m Tetrofosmin

Pearls & Pitfalls in nuclear cardiology

CHRONIC CAD DIAGNOSIS

Stress Testing:Which Study is Indicated for My Patient?

OTHER NON-CARDIAC USES OF Tc-99m CARDIAC AGENTS Tc-99m Sestamibi for parathyroid imaging, breast tumor imaging, and imaging of other malignant tumors.

Which Test When? Avoid the Stress of Stress Testing. Marc Newell, MD, FACC, FSCCT Minneapolis Heart Institute

Diagnosis of CAD S Richard Underwood

Use of Nuclear Cardiology in Myocardial Viability Assessment and Introduction to PET and PET/CT for Advanced Users

P F = R. Disorder of the Breast. Approach to the Patient with Chest Pain. Typical Characteristics of Angina Pectoris. Myocardial Ischemia

Nuclear Cardiology Cardiac Myocardial Perfusion with 82 Rb. Dominique Delbeke, MD, PhD Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, TN

SPECT-CT: Τι πρέπει να γνωρίζει ο Καρδιολόγος

Abnormal, Autoquant Adenosine Myocardial Perfusion Heart Imaging. ID: GOLD Date: Age: 46 Sex: M John Doe Phone (310)

How to Report Effectively on a Nuclear Cardiology Study

Zahid Rahman Khan, MD(USA), MS Diplomate American Board of Nuclear Medicine Consultant t Nuclear Medicine

Fractional Flow Reserve: Basics, FAME 1, FAME 2. William F. Fearon, MD Associate Professor Stanford University Medical Center

Patient-centered Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease. Jason H Cole, MD, MS, FACC January 10, 2015

Stress Echo Cases Sunday, October 8, :10 3:30 PM 20 min

21st Annual Contemporary Therapeutic Issues in Cardiovascular Disease

Optimal testing for coronary artery disease in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients

Difficult Data Definitions and Scenario s

Tc-99m Sestamibi/Tetrofosmin Stress-Rest Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy

Role of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in the Cardiac Evaluation of Aviators

Atypical pain and normal exercise test

@02-126_Coronary_calcification.ppt. Professor Molecular and Medical Pharmacology

Case-Based Pitfalls of SPECT and PET: Recognizing and Working with Artifacts

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Cardiac Diagnostics Workshop. Lori Savard NP Cardiology Update 2015

Rational use of imaging for viability evaluation

David A. Orsinelli, MD, FACC, FASE Professor, Internal Medicine The Ohio State University Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Columbus, Ohio

NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY UPDATE

Hybrid Imaging Improving Nuclear Cardiology Practice

Nuclear medicine in general practice. Dr Reza Garzan MD, FRACP, FAANMS

Hospital, 6 Lukon Road, Lukong Town, Changhua Shien, Taiwan 505, Taiwan.

Choosing the Appropriate Stress Test: Brett C. Stoll, MD, FACC February 24, 2018

Coronary interventions

CASES IN ADVANCED IMAGING

Evaluation of Myocardial Viability: What Have We Learned from STICH? Professor of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. Heart Failure (HF)

Value of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Patients With Normal Resting Electrocardiograms

Conflict Disclosures. Vermont Cardiac Network. Outline. Series Learning Objectives 4/27/2016. Scott E. Friedman April 28, 2016

9/10/2013. September 12, pm. October 2010 through a generous grant provided by WAWA.

EAE Teaching Course. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Competitive or Complementary? Sofia, Bulgaria, 5-7 April F.E. Rademakers

Assessment of Local Myocardial Perfusion in SPECT Images when Bicycle Exercise Test is Noninterpretable

I have no financial disclosures

RADIOTRACERS FOR MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING

EMPHISIS ON PHYSIOLOGY PHYSIOLOGY REQUIRES TIME QUALITATIVE vs. QUANTITATIVE ISOTOPES TO RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS

ASNC CONSENSUS STATEMENT REPORTING OF RADIONUCLIDE MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING STUDIES. Approved August 2003

MPI Overview. Artifacts and Pitfalls in MPI. Acquisition and Processing. Peeyush Bhargava MD, MBA

Maria Angela S. Cruz-Anacleto, MD

Typical chest pain with normal ECG

Diabetes and Occult Coronary Artery Disease

Ve V rmont rmon Card Car iac d Netw Ne ork tw Scott E. Friedman April 28, 2016

ESC CONGRESS 2010 Stockholm, august 28 september 1, 2010

SPECT or PET for Cardiovascular Screening in High-Risk Patients

The Role of Nuclear Imaging in Heart Failure

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Iulia Heinle 1,*, Andre Conradie 2 and Frank Heinle 1

Chest Pain Wave I. Making Dollars and Sense Out of Stress Testing

MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient F. Mut, J. Vitola

Appropriateness of Stress Echocardiography and Nuclear Stress Thallium/Sesta Mibi Testing Methods

New Challenges in Nuclear Cardiology Practice

CASE from South Korea

Getting the Most Out of Stress Echo

Fractional Flow Reserve: Review of the latest data

J. Schwitter, MD, FESC Section of Cardiology


Conflict of Interest Disclosure

CT FFR: Are you ready to totally change the way you diagnose Coronary Artery Disease?

Welcome! To submit questions during the presentation: or Text:

Validation of CT Perfusion Imaging Against Invasive Angiography and FFR on a 320-MDCT Scanner

Cardiac Viability Testing A Clinical Perspective Annual Cardiac Imaging Symposium. Lisa M Mielniczuk MD FRCPC University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Cardiac evaluation for the noncardiac. Nathaen Weitzel MD University of Colorado Denver Dept of Anesthesiology

1. LV function and remodeling. 2. Contribution of myocardial ischemia due to CAD, and

Dual-Tracer Gated Myocardial Scintigraphy

Stress only Perfusion Imaging

Case Presentation #1

MD F A F C A C MAS A N S C

What the Cardiologist needs to know from Medical Images

Case Study 50 YEAR OLD MALE WITH UNSTABLE ANGINA

The 2016 NASCI Keynote: Trends in Utilization of Cardiac Imaging: The Coronary CTA Conundrum. David C. Levin, M.D.

Paradoxical pattern in a patient with previous myocardial infarction F. Mut, M. Kapitan

Assessment of cardiac function using myocardial perfusion imaging technique on SPECT with 99m Tc sestamibi

CARDIOLOGY IMAGING MODALITIES AND PATIENT EXPOSURE

March yr. old male, newspaper writer, with worsening dyspnea /orthopnea past few months

Cardiovascular nuclear imaging employs non-invasive techniques to assess alterations in coronary artery flow, and ventricular function.

Myocardial Perfusion SPECT How to do it E. Moralidis

Using Coronary Artery Calcium Score in the Quest for Cardiac Health. Robert J. Hage, D.O.

Brain Atrophy. Brain Atrophy

An Introduction to PET Imaging in Oncology

Exercise ECG (TMT) is a commonly used investigation in the

Imaging of the Heart Todd Tessendorf MD FACC

Cardiology and Nuclear Medicine Patient Information Leaflet

CARDIAC PET PERFUSION IMAGING with RUBIDIUM-82

FFR-CT Not Ready for Primetime

Cardiovascular nuclear imaging employs non-invasive techniques to assess alterations in coronary artery flow, and ventricular function.

Richard Grocott Mason

CONFUSION IN CARDIAC TESTING. Bilal Aijaz M.D FACC FSCAI

Chest Pain in Women ;What is Your Diagnostic Plan? No Need for Noninvasive Test

12 Lead ECG Interpretation: Color Coding for MI s

PET myocard perfusion & viability Riemer Slart

Transcription:

January 2002 Nuclear Perfusion Imaging of Angina Davin Quinn HMS III Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Radiology Department

Goals of Presentation Understand what a perfusion scan is Understand what it can tell us when a patient has chest pain 2

Introduction Mr. O Pt. is a 66 y.o. male IDDM x 28 yrs. HTN Hypercholesterolemia 80 pack-year smoker No previous cardiac hx 3

HPI Band-like chest pain, 10/10 Increasing in severity over last 2 months Brought on with exertion In ED, relieved with sublingual NTG Perfusion scan was ordered. 4

What is a Nuclear Perfusion Scan? Injection of radioactive isotopes that accumulate in heart tissue and are detected by a gamma ray sensor. The distribution of the isotope corresponds to the amount of blood reaching a given area. The test can be done under exercise stress, or at rest (90% occlusion detected at rest; 50% occlusion detected stressed) 5

Who should get a Scan? Step 1: Take history/perform exam Step 2: Assess CRFs Step 3: Obtain resting EKG Step 4: If nl. EKG and low risk, STOP Step 5: If med/high risk, get exercise EKG Step 6: If exercise EKG nl, STOP Step 7: If exercise EKG abnl, go to scan 6

Mr. O s Stressed Perfusion Scan Modified Bruce protocol treadmill 4 min. duration 87% of max HR obtained Sx: 10/10 chest pain Pain resolved after 6 min. EKG: 3 mm. horizontal ST depressions in V4-V6 (lateral territory) 7

EKG Changes Pre-stress Post-stress 8

Modified Bruce Protocol Bruce protocol: Begin walking at 1.7 mph and 10% grade (5 METS), gradually increase q3min. up to 5.5 mph, 20% grade. Modified = 2 x 3 min. warm up periods at 1.7 mph and 0% grade, and 1.7 mph and 5% grade respectively. Modified for pts. with exercise limitations due to cardiac disease. 9

METS? 3-5 METS = easy walking 5-7 METS = raking leaves, singles tennis 7-9 METS = running 6-7 mph 13 METS =? 10

METS? 3-5 METS = easy walking 5-7 METS = raking leaves, singles tennis 7-9 METS = running 6-7 mph 13 METS =? 11

Gamma Ray Tracing Step 1: Thallium injection at the door Step 2: Imaging @ 15 min. Step 3: Exercise stress test @ 60 min. Step 4: MIBI injection @ 1 min. prior to quitting Step 5: Imaging @ 90 min. Three agents: Thallium Sestamibi Tetrofosmin 12

Thallium Potassium analogue High extraction fraction Thallium uptake dependent on cell viability, intact Na/K ATPase pump 13

Thallium Disadvantages Low energy emission (70-80 kev) Low energy rays scatter and attenuate easily Long half-life (74 hrs), which limits dose, count rate and efficiency Redistribution of tracer to ischemic areas 14

Sestamibi/Tetrofosmin Tc99m 2-methoxyisobutylisonitrile Uptake not related to Na/K ATPase activity. Passive diffusion across and binding to intact sarcolemmal & mitochondrial membranes. No redistribution mibi stays in cells, gives snapshot of perfusion at time of ischemia. 15

Sestamibi/Tetrofosmin Less total radiation than Thallium Shorter half-life (6 hrs) 16

Head to Head Thallium 70 kev t1/2 = 74 hrs Rad dose = 0.21 mci Sestamibi 140 kev t1/2 = 6 hrs Rad dose = 0.02 mci 17

Best of Both Worlds Current protocol: dual-tracer Give thallium for rest imaging Give sestamibi for exercise imaging Brings test time under 3 hours Single-tracer takes 6-24 hours 18

Epidemiology Sensitivity ~ 90% for CAD Specificity ~ 90% for CAD False positives Breast tissue ~ anterior wall defect Diaphragm ~ inferior wall defect LBBB ~ perfusion defect Upward creep: apparent reversible defect in the inferior and basal inferoseptal walls as heart returns to nl. position following exercise. 19

Mr. O s Scintigraphy Results Severe defects in: inferior portion of lateral wall lateral portion of inferior wall Lateral reversible Inferior partially reversible 20

Mr. O s Perfusion Scan Images stress resting 21

Mr. O s Perfusion Scan Images stress resting 22

Imaging Views (From the Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, American College of Cardiology; the Committee on Advanced Cardiac Imaging and Technology, Council of Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association; and the Board of Directors, Cardiovascular Council Society of Nuclear Medicine: ACC/AHA/SNM Policy Statement: Standardization of cardiac tomographic imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 1:117, 1994.) 23

Mr. O s Transverse Section RV LV Filling defect 24

Perfusion Territories (Modified from Port SC (ed): Imaging Guidelines for Nuclear Cardiology Procedures, Part 2. J Nucl Cardiol 6:649, 1999.) 25

Mr. O s Vertical Long Section LV Base Apex Filling defect 26

Mr. O s Horizontal Long Section Apex LV Base 27

Mr. O s Polar Map of LV Filling defect 28

Perfusion (From Wackers FJTh: Exercise myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med 35:726, 1994.) 29

Why Bother with Nukes? Non-invasive Digital images are quantifiable Highly reproducible Findings on perfusion scan correlate well with disease outcomes, better than cath alone. Able to risk-stratify pts into low/med/high risk groups for future cardiac events, and be aggressive/conservative on this basis 30

Why not go straight to cath? >10,000 subjects w/ chest pain 5000 had a scan before cath 5000 had cath only Result: no difference in outcome, but total cost and follow-up cost were 30-40% lower for scan group. (Shaw LJ, Miller DD, Romeis JC, et al: Gender differences in the nonivasive evaluation and management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 120:559, 1994.) Supported by the EMPIRE study 31

Mr. O s Cardiac Catheterization EF 45% LMCA: 60% occluded, mod. calcification LAD: 70%, mod. calc. pcx: 90%, ostial calcific lesion RCA: 90% mrca: 70%, with thrombus 32

Coronary Anatomy http--www.methodisthealth.com-health-heart-artcoro.htm.gif 33

Mr. O s Cardiac Catheterization Images RAO Caudal LM LAD C 34

Cardiac Catheterization Images RAO Caudal 70% LM LAD C 90% 35

Mr. O s Cardiac Catheterization Images LM LAD D 36

Mr. O s Cardiac Catheterization Images LM 40% LAD D 37

Mr. O s Cardiac Catheterization Images LM LAD 38

Mr. O s Cardiac Catheterization Images 60% LM LAD 39

Mr. O s Cardiac Catheterization Images LAD LM C 40

Mr. O s Cardiac Catheterization Images LAD LM C 41

Mr. O s Cardiac Catheterization Images LM C 42

Mr. O s Cardiac Catheterization Images LM C 43

Mr. O s Cardiac Catheterization Images RCA PDA 44

Mr. O s Cardiac Catheterization Images RCA Filling defects = thrombi Distal occlusion 90% PDA 45

Hospital Course Dx: severe 4-vessel CAD Admitted to Farr 3, seen by CT Surgery Tx: 4V-CABG asap 46

Summary Nuclear perfusion scans are highly diagnostic and prognostic tests that are minimally invasive. They demonstrate physiologically significant perfusion deficits, often above what anatomical studies can show. Cost-effective for med/high risk patients. 47

The End 48

References Braunwald E: Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 6 th edition. WB Saunders Co., 2001. Link KM and Lesko NM: The Radiologic Clinics of North America: Cardiac Imaging, Vol. 32, 3. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co., May 1994. 49

Acknowledgements Pamela Lepkowski Larry Barbaras and Cara Lyn D amour, our webmasters 50