EFSA and Member States

Similar documents
TECHNICAL REPORT OF EFSA 1 on Scientific Cooperation between EFSA and Member States: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead

Work Plan Committed to ensuring that Europe s food is safe

PREPERATION OF TURKEY TO EFSA ACTIVITIES

EFSA s activities on data collection (Art. 33) and proposal for a new initiative (EUMENU) H. Deluyker Director

Science protecting consumers. from field to fork. Committed to ensuring that Europe s food is safe

PROGRESS REPORT. Catherine Geslain-Lanéelle. Management Board meeting 8 October 2009, Parma

French cooperation with EFSA

Welcome and introduction to EFSA

Using science to establish effective food safety control for the European Union Dr David Jukes

Who are we? What are we doing? Why are we doing it?

Pre Accession Programme support and Capacity Building

Scientific Cooperation and Networking between EFSA and Member States

Food Safety Risk Assessment and Risk Management at a European Level

Integrating Risk Assessment in Meat Hygiene

Parma, 21/09/2015 SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION OF REGULATED PRODUCTS DEPARTMENT

Risk Assessment to Risk Management Terminology of Risk Assessment. EFSA Project on Risk Assessment Terminology

TECHNICAL REPORT OF EFSA. List of guidance, guidelines and working documents developed or in use by EFSA 1

Management Board Meeting Parma, 18 th December 2008 PROGRESS REPORT. Catherine Geslain-Lanéelle

EFSA S MOST RECENT ACTIVITIES. Catherine Geslain-Lanéelle. EFSA Stakeholders Consultative Platform, 22 June 2010, Parma

MINUTES OF THE 36TH PLENARY MEETING OF THE SCIENTIFIC PANEL ON BIOLOGICAL HAZARDS HELD IN PARMA ON 5-6 DECEMBER 2007

Working together on Food Safety

REPORT OF THE SPECIAL ADVISORY FORUM MEETING ON EU GMO RISK ASSESSMENT

The European Food Safety Summit

Management Board Meeting Roma, 29 January 2009 PROGRESS REPORT. Catherine Geslain-Lanéelle

EFSA s work on meat inspection. Frank Boelaert BIOMO unit. WAVFH Wallonie-Bruxelles, après-midi d étude, 21 Novembre 2012

EU Risk Assessment Agenda Research and collaboration

Risk Communications: the role and experience of the European Food Safety Authority

COOPERATION FOR INCREASED SCIENTIFIC CAPACITY

EFSA European Food Safety Authority

European Food Safety Authority

The Republic of Macedonia on its way to the EU Building up of the food safety system in cooperation with EFSA

General tasks and structure of the EFSA and its role on risk assessment for microbiological hazards

An example of intersectoral collaboration: the EU model. European Commission Health and Consumers Directorate-General (DG SANCO)

Implementation of indicators for biological hazards by meat inspection of poultry

EFSA s Concise European food consumption database. Davide Arcella Data Collection and Exposure Unit

Monitoring of foodborne outbreaks caused by toxin-producing bacteria in the European Union Giusi Amore

Minutes of the. Microbiological Risk Assessment

The OIE World Animal Health and Welfare Fund

2008 Public Status Report on the Implementation of the European Risk Management Strategy. Executive Summary

Action plan for improving the peer review process. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Factors to Consider in Decision Making Given Variability and Uncertainty in Microbiological Risk Assessment: A Governmental Perspective

STRATEGIC PLAN OF THE EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY FOR Committed to ensuring that Europe s food is safe

CFS MYPoW Chair Proposal on the HLPE work in 2018

Towards a coordinated risk assessment framework?

Workshop for OIE national Focal Points for Veterinary Products November 2010, Johannesburg, South Africa. Presentation

Peer counselling A new element in the ET2020 toolbox

Recent Developments and Future Plans in the EFSA Assessments of Pesticides. Hermine Reich Pesticides Unit

ANNEX I EFSA s Scientific Panels and Scientific Committee

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

The NHS Cancer Plan: A Progress Report

1. The Working Party on Public Health discussed and agreed the draft Council conclusions as set out in the Annex.

Committee of Senior Representatives Tenth Meeting Oslo, Norway 11 December 2006

Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards

The HIV Prevention England programme: what s next? Cary James May 2016

The OIE approach to One Health

STRATEGIC APPROACH & WORKPLAN 2007

Emanuela Turla Scientific Officer Nutrition Unit - EFSA

PROPOSED WORK PROGRAMME FOR THE CLEARING-HOUSE MECHANISM IN SUPPORT OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR BIODIVERSITY Note by the Executive Secretary

PROMOTION AND MAINTENANCE OF NEW ZEALAND SIGN LANGUAGE

Horizon 2020: EFSA s Priority Research Topics. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Georges Kass, Jeffrey Moon and Tobin Robinson

Overview of 2015 Zoonoses Data

EU Actions in the Area of Communicable Disease Control. Ines Steffens Managing Editor Eurosurveillance

The functions of the LSCB prescribed in the Local Safeguarding Children Boards Regulations 2006 are as follows:

Pesticide risk assessment: changes and perspectives for mammalian toxicology in the new EC regulation 1107/2009

Co-operation in Risk Communications: Meeting information needs of European consumers

Importance of Food Safety for Consumer Protection and International Trade

NORDIC CONFERENCE ON RARE DISEASES

Thank you Mr President and good morning

The Identification of Food Safety Priorities using the Delphi Technique

EFSA work on Cumulative Risk Assessment of pesticides. Luc Mohimont EFSA Pesticides Unit EuroMix Project 20/05/2015

HIV & AIDS INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN CENTRE FOR HIV AND AIDS (CHA)

Recent and on-going WGS initiatives and activities of EFSA

CORPORATE PLANS FOR CHILD PROTECTION AND LOOKED ATER CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE

Engaging People Strategy

International 59th Meat Conference in Serbia Better food Better life

WHO Initiative to Estimate the Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL INTERIM REPORT 02_2013

THE CARDIFF COMMITMENT TO YOUTH ENGAGEMENT AND PROGRESSION: REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & LIFELONG LEARNING

Giving voice to youth. A guidance brief for UNFPA on the Youth Advisory Group of the UNFPA SUB REGIONAL OFFICE FOR THE CARIBBEAN

MEDICAL SCIENCES - Vol.II -The Need For an International Approach The Role of FAO and WHO - Jorgen Schlundt and Kazuaki Miyagishima

Pre-Accession Study tour to the Irish Food Safety Authority 1, 2

Participants. Page 1 of 2 BIOCONTAM UNIT

Table Of Content. EURORDIS_FY Summary... 3 Coordinator, Leader contact and partners... 6 Outputs... 7

14414/15 AF/evt 1 DG G 3 C

EFSA s Catalogue of support initiatives during the lifecycle of applications for regulated products

Feedback on the Training on the Risk Assessment Model ImproRisk

Nutrition research and food legislation the role of EFSA

Scientific Opinion on Campylobacter

Food additives and nutrient sources added to food: developments since the creation of EFSA

Codex and OIE Cooperation: a regional perspective

North Somerset Autism Strategy

Overview of 2014 Zoonoses Data

Planning for preparedness: EU perspectives on Avian Influenza, African Swine Fever and Lumpy Skin Disease

EFSA cross-cutting guidance lifecycle. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Daniela Maurici, Raquel Garcia Matas, Andrea Gervelmeyer

Nova Scotia Advisory Council on Status of Women. Presentation to the Standing Committee on Community Services February 2, 2016

Table Of Content. SSI_FY Summary... 3 Coordinator, Leader contact and partners... 7 Outputs... 8

EU REFERENCE LABORATORIES FOR AVIAN INFLUENZA AND NEWCASTLE DISEASE

Estimation of animal intakes and HR, STMR and MRL calculations for products of animal origin

Martin Foley, Minister for Mental Health Message to the mental health sector

WORKABLE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, BRUSSELS 9 NOVEMBER 2016

Transcription:

Scientific Cooperation between EFSA and Member States Taking Stock and Looking Ahead Committed to ensuring that Europe s food is safe

Scientific Cooperation between EFSA and Member States Scientific cooperation between EFSA and Member States is crucial to help build risk assessment capacity across Europe and address effectively the needs of risk managers. This brochure aims to help raise awareness amongst the various organisations and potential partners in the EU Member States about the need to consolidate risk assessment resources and to further strengthen scientific cooperation with EFSA. Background Established to help ensure a high level of consumer protection and contribute to restoring and maintaining confidence in the EU food supply, EFSA is committed to delivering independent scientific advice. The challenge EFSA is facing can only be met through cooperation and the intelligent use and sharing of resources, data and expertise. Scientific cooperation between EFSA and EU Member States is therefore crucial and a key priority for EFSA. It takes place at all levels: from national competent authorities to scientific organisations and individual experts. Through its Strategic Plan 2009-2013, EFSA has put in place a multi-annual plan. To even better face the challenges ahead, the Strategic Plan was complemented by a medium-term plan on the scientific cooperation activities of EFSA s Scientific Committee, its Panels and Units in the area of food and feed safety, nutrition, animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection. The planned medium-term activities have been summarised in the report Scientific Cooperation between EFSA and Member States: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead published on the EFSA website (http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/97e.htm). The report covers data collection, research and scientific evaluation activities which underpin EFSA s work. 02

EFSA s scientific cooperation partners The Advisory Forum, Focal Points and dedicated networks are key vehicles for data and information exchange, and consultation between EFSA and Members States. The importance of networks, both for supporting the risk assessment process and for data collection programmes, will further increase. These networks facilitate scientific cooperation through the coordination of activities, the exchange of information (e.g. on recent risk assessment activities or on data collection), the development and implementation of joint projects (e.g. scientific events and workshops), and the exchange of expertise and best practice in the fields within EFSA s mission. Under Article 36 of Regulation (EC) 178/2002, EFSA can award grants to organisations that have been officially nominated by Permanent Representations of Member States to assist EFSA in its tasks - a successful way to bring together expertise and resources at national and EU levels. >>> Advisory Forum EFSA s Advisory Forum connects EFSA with the national food safety authorities of all 27 EU Member States, Iceland, and Norway. Its members represent each national body responsible for food safety risk assessment in the EU, Iceland and Norway, with observers from Switzerland and the European Commission. It is chaired by EFSA s Executive Director. Through the Forum, EFSA and the Member States can join forces in addressing European risk assessment and risk communication issues. Members use the Forum to advise EFSA on scientific matters, its work programme and priorities, and to raise emerging issues. Focal Points Focal Points act as the interface between EFSA and national food safety authorities in the EU Member States. They support the Advisory Forum members in the implementation of joint projects between Member States and EFSA. Focal Points ensure the exchange of scientific information among competent authorities in Member States and between Member States and EFSA. They provide advice on joint projects, such as the Expert Database and cooperation with competent organisations under Article 36 of EFSA s Founding Regulation. They also assist in raising EFSA s scientific visibility and outreach in Member States. Networks of scientific organisations The aim of networks is to support EFSA and Member States in carrying out its mission. Members of networks represent the national competent organisation by which they are appointed. Representatives of the Commission and of other organisations, including those from outside the EU with specific expertise may also be invited to participate in the work of EFSA networks. 03

Scientific Cooperation between EFSA and Member States <<< In addition, the Authority commissions scientific projects through procurement. The total amount of EFSA funds dedicated to cooperation projects with organisations in Member States in order to support EFSA in its scientific tasks has considerably increased. From 2.9 million in 2007 to 7.8 million in 2010, EFSA has spent approximately 16 million in funds for grant and procurement activities (approximately 6.7 million on grants and 9.3 million on procurement projects, including agreements). 10 8 Budget in M 6 4 2 Procurement and agreements Grants 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year Figure 1: Total amounts (in ) spent (2007-2010) and planned (2011) for procurements/agreements and grants between 2007 and 2011 Effective pooling of excellence is also supported through EFSA s steadily growing Expert Database, which is accessible both to EFSA and to competent authorities in Member States allowing them to search and identify the most appropriate experts available. 04

Taking Stock and Looking Ahead Scientific cooperation activities Providing the best possible and most comprehensive scientific advice to risk managers requires a multidisciplinary and integrated approach. This is being achieved not only by the contribution of expertise from all around Europe, but also by cooperating closely with scientific organisations in Member States on issues related to risk assessment. Data collection programmes, organisation of scientific colloquia and workshops, public consultations on scientific outputs of EFSA as well as the regular exchange of information on risk assessment activities carried out in the Member States, have proved to be successful scientific cooperation activities in recent years and will therefore be continued in the future. Other mechanisms for cooperation have also been successfully established: the Expert Database, the Information Exchange Platform, and the network of Article 36 organisations. Risk communications Alongside effective scientific cooperation, communications and dialogue on risk assessment is equally important. The promotion of coherence in risk communications was therefore identified as one of the four priority areas for strengthening the cooperation and networking between the Member States and EFSA. Cooperation and coherence in communications, implemented through the Advisory Forum Communications Working Group (AFCWG), has been strengthened through: continued pre-notification of public announcements on EFSA s scientific work; proactive exchanges on key issues such as GMOs, food colours, and nanotechnology; and the exchange of information on emerging issues in individual Member States, focusing on the implications for communications. Risk communications guidelines are currently under development. 05

Risk Asse EFSA Ne Article 36 n Information Scientific Cooperation between EFSA and Member States Advisor Risk Comm EFSA Exper Data Co Focal 06

Taking Stock and Looking Ahead y Forum ssments tworks unications etworking Exchange t Database llection Points 07

Scientific Cooperation between EFSA and Member States Future challenges in scientific cooperation between EFSA and Member States EFSA will continue to see its workload increase, particularly concerning the safety assessment of regulated substances, products and claims submitted for authorisation in the EU. Increasing efficiency is therefore key. Boosting risk assessment capacity in Europe is important to meet this growing need for scientific advice. EFSA will therefore need to further build on its scientific cooperation with Member States, whose commitment to collaboration is crucial. EFSA brings together the extensive scientific expertise available across Europe and seeks to foster its efficient use. The Advisory Forum, the Focal Points and the dedicated networks make sure that the data and information exchange, consultations, and work sharing between EFSA Member States competent authorities take place. In addition, cooperation tools, such as targeted and public consultations, the cooperation via workshops and scientific colloquia, have further evolved. Furthermore, seminars have been organised in Member States to raise awareness of EFSA s work. 08

Taking Stock and Looking Ahead EU Member States Figure 2: Scientific Cooperation between EFSA and Member States EFSA Risk assessment Risk communications Information exchange Data collection All these activities, which have been started or solidified in recent years, have resulted in clear benefits: > ability to deal with an increasing workload, while increasing quality and efficiency; > building on existing work and reduction of duplication of efforts; > increased consistency and quality of data; > harmonisation of risk assessment requirements and convergence in the interpretation of scientific information. The information provided in the report is meant to inform the Advisory Forum, competent authorities and organisations included in the Article 36 list on EFSA s activities planned for the coming years. It provides the basis for a broader discussion and prioritisation in Member States. The members of the Advisory Forum, supported by their respective Focal Point, have a crucial role in initiating and steering this discussion which will help identify the capacity and core competencies of each Member State. These will be used to ensure that EFSA can cope with the increasing workload and fulfil its mission. In addition to discussions between EFSA and competent authorities in Member States on medium-term planning, EFSA will work together with the European Commission to anticipate the tasks allocated to EFSA in the coming years and optimise cooperation to meet expectations. 09

Scientific Cooperation between EFSA and Member States Examples of efficient scientific cooperation 1. Contaminants in the food chain Member States cooperate with EFSA by submitting occurrence data for various contaminants in food and/or feed (e.g. heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants, and marine biotoxins). Dietary habits can vary considerably between Member States. Hence, it is important to assess exposure in the Member States. A good example is a series of risk assessments related to marine biotoxins carried out by the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM). The unit dealing with Data Collection and Exposure (DATEX) collected data from EU Member States on both toxin occurrence and shellfish portions consumed in single meals. The CONTAM Panel identified 400 g of shellfish meat as an appropriate estimate of a large portion size consumed in Europe. The data was then used in risk assessment with the aim of helping to protect consumers with a high consumption of shellfish against acute effects of marine biotoxins. 2. Genetically modified organisms Since 2005, EFSA also ensures a close collaboration with competent authorities in Member States in the framework of applications in the area of genetically modified organisms (GMO) for cultivation (submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003). In this context, EFSA collaborates with competent authorities of Member States that have volunteered to take charge of the initial Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) of GMO applications for cultivation. In 2010 the dialogue with competent authorities in Member States has further been strengthened through the creation of a network, where scientific experts from competent authorities and EFSA work together. 3. Biological hazards With regard to biological hazards (covered by the BIOHAZ Panel) cooperation with Member States takes place through the networks on spongiform encephalopathies (BSE-TSE) and Microbiological Risk Assessment (MRA). These networks have identified emerging issues and triggered several self-tasking mandates with the aim of better protecting European consumers. 10

Taking Stock and Looking Ahead between efsa and Member States 4. Zoonoses In close cooperation with the Member State network on zoonoses, EFSA s Zoonoses Data Collection Unit (ZOONOSES) collects, analyses, and reports data on zoonoses, antimicrobial resistance, microbiological contaminants and food-borne outbreaks. These reports are key tools for risk managers, for example to monitor progress in the achievement of targets in disease occurrence with the aim of protecting human health. The unit further extracts specific datasets to support the preparation of scientific opinions requested by the European Commission to the Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) and the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW). Datasets have been provided on for example: > opinions on Salmonella targets in breeding poultry flocks and flocks of laying hens; > quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessments (QMRAs) on Salmonella in pigs and Campylobacter in broiler meat; > opinions on the assessment of the risk of echinococcosis and porcine brucellosis (Brucella suis). 5. Pesticides EFSA is responsible for the EU peer review of active substances used in plant protection products to evaluate their safety for consumers, animals and the environment. This task is carried out in line with procedures and deadlines set out in European legislation. It involves applicants, Member States competent authorities and the European Commission. The Regulation on Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) of pesticides foresees the coordination of several data collection activities by EFSA. This work is done in collaboration with Member States and is coordinated by the Pesticide Risk Assessment Peer Review (PRAPeR) Unit, whilst the Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) Panel is responsible for the establishment of risk assessment guidance of these compounds on which Member States competent authorities are consulted. 11

TM-31-11-024-EN-C Photo credits of cover visuals and internal pages: Istock, Fotolia, Van Parys & Mark Poprocki Largo N. Palli 5/a 43121 Parma ITALY Tel. +39 0521 036 111 Fax +39 0521 036 110 www.efsa.europa.eu doi:10.2805/12230