Reporting cytogenetics Can it make sense? Daniel Weisdorf MD University of Minnesota

Similar documents
Update on the WHO Classification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Kaaren K. Reichard, MD Mayo Clinic Rochester

AML: WHO classification, biology and prognosis. Dimitri Breems, MD, PhD Internist-Hematoloog Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen

WHO Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms with Defined Molecular Abnormalities

Fluorescence in-situ Hybridization (FISH) ETO(RUNX1T1)/AML1(RUNX1) or t(8;21)(q21.3;q22)

Role of FISH in Hematological Cancers

Molecular Markers in Acute Leukemia. Dr Muhd Zanapiah Zakaria Hospital Ampang

Meeting VAKB 8 februari 2011 Nancy Boeckx, MD, PhD

5/21/2018. Disclosures. Objectives. Normal blood cells production. Bone marrow failure syndromes. Story of DNA

Examining Genetics and Genomics of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in 2017

Cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities in AML. Dr Elizabeth Tegg Director of haematology Pathology West

Krishna Reddy CH and Ashwin Dalal. Diagnostics Division, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad

Treatments and Current Research in Leukemia. Richard A. Larson, MD University of Chicago

Significance of Chromosome Changes in Hematological Disorders and Solid Tumors

Significance of Chromosome Changes in Hematological Disorders and Solid Tumors

Test Name Results Units Bio. Ref. Interval. Positive

Jordi Esteve Hospital Clínic (Barcelona) Acute Leukemia Working Party. The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Initial Diagnostic Workup of Acute Leukemia

Case #1. 65 yo man with no prior history presented with leukocytosis and circulating blasts: Bone marrow biopsy was performed

HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES BIOLOGY

GENETICS OF HEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES

Test Name Results Units Bio. Ref. Interval. Positive

Protocol for the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Hematopoietic Neoplasms Involving the Bone Marrow*

Cytogenetics Update. Lynda J Campbell

Acute Lymphoblastic and Myeloid Leukemia

Acute Myeloid Leukemia with RUNX1 and Several Co-mutations

Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Recurrent Cytogenetic Abnormalities

Impact of Biomarkers in the Management of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia: prognosis and treatment. Dimitri A. Breems, MD, PhD Internist-Hematoloog Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Campus Stuivenberg

Cost-Effective Strategies in the Workup of Hematologic Neoplasm. Karl S. Theil, Claudiu V. Cotta Cleveland Clinic

The Past, Present, and Future of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Oncology Genetics: Cytogenetics and FISH 17/09/2014

CYTOGENETICS Dr. Mary Ann Perle

HEMATOPATHOLOGY SUMMARY REPORT RL;MMR;

Reclassification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia According to the 2016 WHO Classification

Test Name Results Units Bio. Ref. Interval. Positive

Introduction to Cytogenetics

Hematopathology Case Study

WHO Classification 7/2/2009

Objectives. Morphology and IHC. Flow and Cyto FISH. Testing for Heme Malignancies 3/20/2013

Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemias

N Engl J Med Volume 373(12): September 17, 2015

Dr. Anjali Kelkar (DNB Path, IFCAP)

Acute myeloid leukemia. M. Kaźmierczak 2016

Acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2016 update

The Revised 2016 WHO Classification of Acute Leukemias

Case 1. Sa A.Wang, MD UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX

Review. Genetic Tests To Evaluate Prognosis and Predict Therapeutic Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Minimal Residual Disease as a Surrogate Endpoint in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Clinical Trials

Cytogenetic abnormalities in Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Sweden. A population based study.

Myelodysplastic Syndrome Case 158

Integration of microarray analysis into the clinical diagnosis of hematological malignancies: How much can we improve cytogenetic testing?

SWOG ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROFESSIONAL (ORP) MANUAL LEUKEMIA FORMS CHAPTER 16A REVISED: DECEMBER 2017

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

HSCT - Minimum Essential Data - A REGISTRATION - DAY 0

Disclosure: Objectives/Outline. Leukemia: Genealogy of Pathology Practice: Old Diseases New Expectations. Nothing to disclose.

Diagnostic Molecular Pathology of Myeloid Neoplasms

Combinations of morphology codes of haematological malignancies (HM) referring to the same tumour or to a potential transformation

TEST MENU TEST CPT CODES TAT. Chromosome Analysis Bone Marrow x 2, 88264, x 3, Days

«Adverse Prognosis» Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Enhancing Assessment of Myeloid Disorders in the Era of Precision Medicine

Kylie Lepic BSc, MD, FRCPC CAGPO Conference

Molecular Hematopathology Leukemias I. January 14, 2005

Session 7 Summary. Magdalena Czader, MD, PhD David Czuchlewski, MD MOLECULAR GENETICS OF HEMATOPOIETIC NEOPLASMS

CHALLENGING CASES PRESENTATION

Juan Ma 1, Jennifer Dunlap 2, Lisong Shen 1, Guang Fan 2 1

ESTABLISHED AND EMERGING THERAPIES FOR ACUTE MYELOID LEUKAEMIA. Dr Rob Sellar UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK

Hematological malignancies :

CLL Complete SM Report

Form 2011 R4.0: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Pre-HCT Data

Chromosomal Aberrations

Hematology Unit Lab 2 Review Material

Therapy-related MDS/AML with KMT2A (MLL) Rearrangement Following Therapy for APL Case 0328

Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia with i(17)(q10)

Supplementary Appendix

Chromosome Abnormalities

Outline. Chromosomal analysis FISH. Chromosomal abnormalities in cancer. Clinical application of cytogenetics. Procedure Nomenclature

A pediatric patient with acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage with a NUP98-NSD1 rearrangement SH

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Early Detection, Diagnosis, and Types

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm with DNMT3A and TET2 mutations (SH )

Case Workshop of Society for Hematopathology and European Association for Haematopathology

Clinical utility of FISH analysis in addition to G-banded karyotype in hematologic malignancies and proposal of a practical approach

Concomitant WT1 mutations predicted poor prognosis in CEBPA double-mutated acute myeloid leukemia

Molecular Markers. Marcie Riches, MD, MS Associate Professor University of North Carolina Scientific Director, Infection and Immune Reconstitution WC

A. Incorrect! All the cells have the same set of genes. (D)Because different types of cells have different types of transcriptional factors.

Trapianto allogenico convenzionale

Recommended Timing for Transplant Consultation

Acute Leukemia. Sebastian Giebel. Geneva 03/04/

Molecular. Oncology & Pathology. Diagnostic, Prognostic, Therapeutic, and Predisposition Tests in Precision Medicine. Liquid Biopsy.

Classification and risk assessment in AML: integrating cytogenetics and molecular profiling

Detection of Mutations in FLT3 and Jak-2 Genes in Patients with Different Subtypes of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Karyotypes Detect Chromosome Mutations

Addressing the challenges of genomic characterization of hematologic malignancies using microarrays

Acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes

Classification of Hematologic Malignancies. Patricia Aoun MD MPH

2010 Hematopoietic and Lymphoid ICD-O Codes - Alphabetical List THIS TABLE REPLACES ALL ICD-O-3 Codes

2012 Hematopoietic and Lymphoid ICD-O Codes - Numerical List THIS TABLE REPLACES ALL ICD-O-3 Codes

Transcription:

Reporting cytogenetics Can it make sense? Daniel Weisdorf MD University of Minnesota

Reporting cytogenetics What is it? Terminology Clinical value What details are important

Diagnostic Tools for Leukemia Microscope What do the cells (blasts) look like? How do they stain? Flow Cytometry fluorescent antibody measure of molecules and density on cells Cytogenetics and changes Chromosome number, structure Molecular testing (PCR) DNA or RNA changes that indicate the tumor cells

Diagnosis- Immunocytochemistry MPO and PAS (red) in normal BM MPO in M2 (orange) M7 Factor VIII related protein identifies blasts of megakaryocyte lineage.

Immunocytochemistry M5 Strongly positive for the nonspecific esterase Inhibited by Fluoride. M5 Chloroacetate esterase stains neutrophils blue,nonspecific esterase stains monocytes redbrown

Reporting cytogenetics How are they tested? What is FISH? What s the difference? What do they mean?

Reporting cytogenetics How are they tested? Structural and numerical changes in chromosomes while cells are dividing What is FISH? Fluorescent in situ hybridization Specific markers on defined chromosome sites What s the difference? Dividing (metaphase) vs non-dividing (interphase) What do they mean? Molecular probes to find chromsome changes

Cytogenetics Specimen requirements Sodium heparin (green top) Core biopsy acceptable (in saline, RPMI or other media) FFPE tissue acceptable for FISH UNLESS it has been decalcified G-banding Requires dividing cells to be able to examine chromosomes during metaphase FISH Cells need not be dividing

Analysis 20 metaphase cells are analyzed by G- banding FISH frequently used to confirm presence of a specific gene rearrangement and can be used to monitor response to therapy FISH can examine hundreds of cells

Clone 2 or more cells with gain of a specific chromosome 2 or more cells with the same structural chromosomal abnormality -- OR -- 3 or more cells with loss of a specific chromosome

What s a karyotype

Dividing Cells Chromosomes are spread out

Photographs of stained chromosomes lined up by size (& number)

Size and banding pattern identifies each chromosome

Advantages of FISH Targets relatively stable DNA within the cell Quantitates genetic changes cell-by-cell Simultaneous assessment of multiple genetic targets in an intact cell Easy to perform Short time-to-result Equipment generally available in most laboratories

Types of FISH probes Centromere enumeration probes To monitor number of a specific chromosome in a cell

Karyotype: Chromosomes in pairs; numbered by size

47,XY,+8 47 chromosomes, male Gain (extra) chromosome 8

CEP 8 CEP6 (hybridization control)

Types of FISH probes Locus specific probes To rule out deletions, gains or rearrangements of specific loci

Dual fusion probes Used to confirm presence of a translocation Fusion signal on each partner (derivative) chromosome Highly specific (very low false positive rate)

46, XX, t(9;22) (q34;q11.2) 46 chromosomes, female Translocation between chromosome 9 and 22 parts of each long arm exchanged balanced translocation: no net gain or loss of material Philadelphia chromosome

t(9;22) Bcr Abl

t(9;22) Bcr Abl

Breakapart probes Used to confirm rearrangements of genes 3 portion of gene or region in one color, 5 in another If rearranged, colors are separated

01bm1144 k

46,XY,inv(16)(p13.1; q22) 46 chromosomes, male Inversion of piece between short and long arm of chromosome 16

FISH AML M3, t(15;17) AML M1, trisomy 8 AML M4Eo-Inv 16

46,XY,t(9;11)(p22;q23) 46 chromosomes, male Translocation between 9 and 11 short arm 9 and long arm 11

46,XX,t(6;9)(p23;q34) 46 chromosomes, female Translocation between 6 and 9 short arm 6 and long arm 9

46,XY,der(5)add(5)(p15.1) add(5)(q31),-6,del(7)(q21q34), inv(10)(p11.2q21),del11(q21q23-13,der(16)t16;17)(p11.2;q11.2), -17,der(18)t(18;21)(p11.2;q11.2) add(19)(q13.3),-20,-21,der(22) t(11;22)(q13;p11.2), +mar1,+mar2,+mar4 complex

46,XY,der(5)add(5)(p15.1) add(5)(q31),-6,del(7)(q21q34), inv(10)(p11.2q21),del11(q21q23-13,der(16)t16;17)(p11.2;q11.2), -17,der(18)t(18;21)(p11.2;q11.2) add(19)(q13.3),-20,-21,der(22) t(11;22)(q13;p11.2), +mar1,+mar2,+mar4 complex

Was the disease status assessed by cytogenetic testing (karyotyping or FISH)? Specify abnormalities -5-7 -17-18 -X -Y +4 +8 +11 +13 +14 +21 monosomy trisomy Were cytogenetic abnormalities identified via FISH? Yes - Go to question 26 No - Go to question 29 Date sample collected: YYYY MM DD t(3;3) t(6;9) t(8;21) t(9;11) t(9;22) t(15;17) and variants t(16;16) translocation New Forms & Format

del(3q) / 3q del(5q) / 5q del(7q) / 7q del(9q) / 9q del(11q) / 11q del(16q) / 16q del(16q) / 16q del(17q) / 17q del(20q) / 20q del(21q) / 21q deletion inv(3) inv(16) inversion (11q23) any abnormality 12p any abnormality Other abnormality - Go to question 28 Were cytogenetic abnormalities identified via karyotyping? Then Same questions

Molecular testing Were tests for molecular markers performed (e.g. PCR, NGS)? Yes Go to question 47 No Go to question 57

FLT3 D835 point mutation FLT3 ITD mutation IDH1 IDH2 KIT NPM1 CEBPA Positive Go to question 48 Negative - Go to question 49 Not done - Go to question 49 Specify CEBPA mutation Biallelic (homozygous) Repeat format for: Monoallelic (heterozygous) Unknown

Pre-TED forms Specify the AML classification: AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities AML with t(9;11) (p22.3;q23.3); MLLT3-KMT2A (5) AML with t(6;9) (p23;q34.1); DEK-NUP214 (6) AML with inv(3) (q21.3;q26.2) or t(3;3) (q21.3;q26.2); GATA2, MECOM (7) AML (megakaryoblastic) with t(1;22) (p13.3;q13.3); RBM15-MKL1 (8) AML with t(8;21); (q22; q22.1); RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (281) AML with inv(16)(p13.1;1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1; q22); CBFB-MYH11 (282) APL with PML-RARA (283) AML with BCR-ABL1 (provisional entity) (3) AML with mutated NPM1 (4) AML with biallelic mutations of CEBPA (297) AML with mutated RUNX1 (provisional entity) (298) AML with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities (i.e., t(4;11), t(6;11), t(9;11), t(11;19)) (284)

Pre-TED forms AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities AML with myelodysplasia related changes (285) Therapy related AML (t-aml) (9) AML, not otherwise specified AML, not otherwise specified (280) AML, minimally differentiated (286) AML without maturation (287) AML with maturation (288) Acute myelomonocytic leukemia (289) Acute monoblastic / acute monocytic leukemia (290) Acute erythroid leukemia (erythroid / myeloid and pure erythroleukemia) (291) Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (292) Acute basophilic leukemia (293) Acute panmyelosis with myelofibrosis (294)

Prognostic Groups by Cytogenetics CIBMTR SWOG Modified by ELN Good prognosis: t(15;17), inv (16), del(16q), t(16;16), t(8;21) without del(9q) or complex Intermediate : Normal karyotype, -Y, +8, +6, del (12p), t(9;11), 11q23 MLL rearranged, any abnormality neither good or poor risk Unfavorable (Poor) Prognosis: abnormal 3, -5, -7, abn11, t(6;9), t(9;22), complex karyotype ( 3 abnormalities)

Dohner Blood, 2017

Outcome of patients with primary acute myeloid leukemia classified into the four European LeukemiaNet genetic groups according to the European LeukemiaNet recommendations. Age <60 Age <60 Age >60 Age >60 Mrózek K et al. JCO 2012;30:4515-4523 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

ELN 2017: AML risks functional & structural 3 D glasses available on request