ANNEX AU PLAN OF ACTION ON DRUG CONTROL AND CRIME PREVENTION (AUPA) ( ) IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX

Similar documents
Addis Ababa, ETHIOPIA P. O. Box 3243 Telephone Cables: OAU, ADDIS ABABA

REVISED ELEMENTS - PROPOSED BY THE UNGASS BOARD TO THE CND FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION - STATUS 4 November 2015

QUESTIONNAIRE. Submission Information. Information for follow-up purposes. Publishing on the UNODC website

DECLARATION ON CONTROL OF ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING AND ABUSE IN AFRICA IN AFRICA ( )

QUESTIONNAIRE. Submission Information. Information for follow-up purposes. Head of International Drug Policy, Home Office

DRAFT OUTCOME DOCUMENT (14 JANUARY 2016) UNGASS

HEMISPHERIC PLAN OF ACTION ON DRUGS

Public health dimension of the world drug problem

Barbados. Evaluation Report on Drug Control ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM)

Third Ministerial Conference of the Paris Pact Partners on Combating Illicit Traffic in Opiates Originating in Afghanistan. (Vienna, 16 February 2012)

ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL (ECOSOC) AND THE COMMISSION ON NARCOTIC DRUGS (CND).

I. INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING / NATIONAL ANTI-DRUG STRATEGY

Expert consultation on the improvement of drug statistics and to strengthen the Annual Report Questionnaire (ARQ) UNODC Concept Note

Expert consultation on improving drug statistics and strengthening the Annual Report Questionnaire (ARQ)

Trinidad and Tobago ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM) INTER-AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE CONTROL COMMISSION (CICAD)

Haiti. Evaluation Report on Drug Control ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM)

Delegations will find in annex the draft Council conclusions on the above-mentioned subject, as endorsed at the HDG meeting on 1 March 2018.

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS)

Nicaragua. Evaluation Report on Drug Control ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM)

Chile. Evaluation Report on Drug Control ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM)

HEMISPHERIC PLAN OF ACTION ON DRUGS,

EXECUTIVE COUNCIL Third Ordinary Session 4 8 July 2003 Maputo, MOZAMBIQUE EX/CL/34 (III) Original: English

Partnership, Cooperation and Action in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Drug Control

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Hemispheric Report. evaluation report on Drug control ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM)

Jamaica. Evaluation Report on Drug Control ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM)

Economic and Social Council

16911/06 ZH/mp 1 DG H II A

Requirements of the International Drug Control Conventions, Catherine Muganga Legal Officer, UNODC Feb 2015

CICAD INTER AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE CONTROL COMMISSION. Secretariat for Multidimensional Security

Honduras. Evaluation Report on Drug Control ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM)

Text of Anti Narcotics Policy 2010

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)

THE ASEAN WORK PLAN ON SECURING COMMUNITIES AGAINST ILLICIT DRUGS

16693/12 JV/sl 1 DG D 2C

Saint Kitts and Nevis. Organization of American States OAS Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission CICAD

ANNUAL PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT FOR 2008 (draft)

The 4 th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting on Drug Matters 29 October 2015, Langkawi, Malaysia. Chairman s Statement

COUNCIL. Official Journal of the European Union. (Information) EU Drugs Action Plan ( ) (2005/C 168/01) Introduction

UNODC/HONLAF/26/CRP.1

Central Committee for Drug Abuse Control. The Republic of the Union of Myanmar. National Drug Control Policy

Economic and Social Council

ASEAN Activities on Increasing Access to ARV and HIV Related Supplies

NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AIDS, DRUGS AND PROSTITUTE CONTROL OF VIETNAM

Identifying Common Ground on Public Health for UNGASS 2016:

Economic and Social Council

QUESTIONNAIRE. Submission Information. Date of submission: 29 June Information for follow-up purposes. P.O. Box Dar es salaam.

MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM) EVALUATOR S MANUAL

I. INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING / NATIONAL ANTI-DRUG STRATEGY

GOVERNMENT OF SIERRA LEONE NATIONAL HIV/AIDS POLICY

The role of UNODC in working law enforcement agencies to promote harm reduction. IHRC, Bangkok, 23 April 2009

I. Shared responsibility in international drug control

1.0 BACKGROUND / PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme and of the United Nations Population Fund

Economic and Social Council

Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis

BEYOND 2008 DECLARATION

Organization of American States OAS Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission CICAD. Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism MEM.

C a n a d a. Organization of American States OAS Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission CICAD

Aide Memoire. Distr.: GENERAL. E/ECA/CWD/7/inf.2 3 May 2011

Global market for synthetic stimulants expanding

Joint UNODC-WHO Action Programme On Drug Dependence Treatment

I. INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING/NATIONAL ANTI-DRUG STRATEGY

I. INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING / NATIONAL ANTI-DRUG STRATEGY

Plan of Action Towards Ending Preventable Maternal, Newborn and Child Mortality

Resolution 59/8 Promotion of measures to target new psychoactive substances and amphetamine-type stimulants

Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Population Fund and the United Nations Office for Project Services

CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTOR. Strategic Intent YEAR PLAN

HOW TO ARTICULATE THE PROBLEM Conducting a Situational Analysis for a Drug Abuse Prevention Programme P R O C C E R

1/5 of world s population 40% of world s poor 400 million < USD 1/day >11 million drug users & > 3.6 million opiate users

ILLICIT DRUG TRADE. Future-oriented policing projects

UNODC/HONLAF/26/CRP.2

Economic and Social Council

Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme and of the United Nations Population Fund

European Union Drugs Strategy

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 7 July /04 CORDROGUE 59

Eurasian Harm Reduction Association (EHRA) Strategic Framework

MEDICINES REGULATORY AUTHORITIES: CURRENT STATUS AND THE WAY FORWARD. Report of the Regional Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Making the world safer from drugs, crime and terrorism

Commission on Narcotic Drugs

IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK OF THE SOLEMN DECLARATION ON GENDER EQUALITY IN AFRICA

Pompidou Group Work Programme Drug policy and human rights: new trends in a globalised context

Nay Pyi Taw DECLARATION 2013

World Health Organization. A Sustainable Health Sector

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

Advocates Rights Actors Justice for

Informal meeting of the Justice and Home Affairs Ministers Sopot July 2011

INTER-AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE CONTROL COMMISSION C I C A D

Legalization, Regulation and Restriction of Access to Cannabis

Contribution by the South African Government to the Proposals, Practical Measures, Best Practices and Lessons Learned that will contribute to

Republic of Turkey- Ministry of Interior-Turkish National Police- Counter Narcotics Department Date of submission: Contact person:

1 See also CND s input provided to the 2016 High-level Political Forum on the theme Ensuring that no one is left behind.

THE ASEAN WORK PLAN ON SECURING COMMUNITIES AGAINST ILLICIT DRUGS

Section 14: Drug Offenses

24 th session. Kazakhstan

The Global S.M.A.R.T. Programme: Synthetics Monitoring: Analysis, Reporting and Trends. ATS trends, programme progress and planned expansion

LOGFRAME FOR LESOTHO

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 30 June /04 CORDROGUE 53

Drug Policy Developments

Organization of American States OAS Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission CICAD. Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism MEM.

Transcription:

ANNEX AU PLAN OF ACTION ON DRUG CONTROL AND CRIME PREVENTION (AUPA) (2013-2017) IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX Outcomes and Outputs Performance Indicators Means of Verification Assumptions/Risks Goal: Improve the health, security and socio-economic well-being of the people in Africa by reducing drug use, illicit trafficking and other associated crimes Outcome 1: Continental, Regional and National management, oversight, reporting and evaluation of the AUPA enhanced Output 1.1: AUC strengthened to manage implementation of Plan of Action Output 1.2: Programme activities identified and jointly developed by RECs and Member States Output 1.3: Research capacity strengthened to collect data and analyse trends related to drugs according to international standards Operational AUPA Secretariat at DSA Formal AUC inter-departmental taskforce on drug control Core team of experts continentally, regionally and nationally No of patnerships and technical cooperation programmes developed Resource mobilisation plan funded Development of programmes and activities Implementation of programmes Increase in number of research reports on drugs submitted to AUC Meeting frequency Contact list and regular exchange Publication Programme Progress Reports and Reviews Questionnaires submitted AUC Collaboration with Partners Output 1.4: National Inter-sectorial Drug Control Coodinating Committees that include members from the criminal justice, health, social, development and law enforcement sectors and NGOs established and meets regularly. No. of countries with national inter-sectorial Drug Control Coordinating Committees No. of countries that have strengthened Inter-sectorial Drug Control Coordinating Committees (e.g. adding sectors, adding NGOs, etc.) Committee meeting reports Committees meet periodically Outcome 2: Outcome 2: Evidence-based services scaled up to address the health and social impact of drug use in Member States

Output 2.1: Baseline studies conducted on: (a) epidemiological information on patterns and trends related to drug use and HIV, and (b) inventory of programmes and services available Output 2.2: National and regional Drug Use Surveillance Networks established and operational Output 2.3: Information disseminated to policy makers, professional bodies, civil society organizations, vulnerable groups and the public at large through advocacy, mass media campaigns and awareness raising Output 2.4: Comprehensive, accessible, evidence-informed, ethical and human rights based drug use prevention, dependence treatment and aftercare services available: 2.4.1 Continental minimum standards for prevention and treatment services developed 2.4.2 Structured and evidence based drug abuse prevention and treatment programmes implemented 2.4.3 A comprehensive package on HIV prevention, treatment and care among injecting and non injecting drug users (IDUs), most at risk populations and in prison settings, developed and implemented 2.4.4 Inclusion of drug users as beneficiaries of national social protection programmes No. of countries with national baseline studies conducted No of countries with data on drug use patterns and trends No of countries with data on drug related HIV No. countries with inventory of intervention programmes and services No. of countries with data on service uptake Formulation of a standardized data collection and analysis method No. of countries with adopted standardized data collection and analysis method No. of countries with the required capacity on the methodology No. of countries with surveillance networks operational No. of policy advocacy campaigns at all levels No. of countries reporting use of research findings in policy and programmes formulation No. of countries reporting increased uptake of prevention and treatment services No. of countries publishing annual drug situation reports No. of countries adopting and implementing ethical and minimum quality standards in prevention and treatment Percentage increase of clients in need who access services No. of countries implementing the comprehensive package on HIV prevention, treatment and care among injecting (IDUs) and stimulant users No. of countries implementing comprehensive package on HIV prevention, treatment and care in prison settings No. of countries with social protection measures for women and young people who have completed drug treatment (and rehabilitation). No. of countries with aftercare plans Advocacy during the AUC Conference of Ministers of Health of the revised AUPA AU minimum standards for drug dependence treatment Baseline studies reports Research reports Standardized data collection and analysis method developed Network reports Advocacy reports Policy documents Statistics Treatment records AU Common Position on drug control awareness raising Country reports Assessment reports Taskforce ToRs Meeting reports Network meetings and reports Political will Budgets available Research capacities Available budgets Available technical capacities (e.g. human, financials and (e.g. human, financials and

Output 2.5: Institutionalise alternatives to incarceration programmes for drug users in conflict with the law, especially those who commit minor offenses resulting from their drug taking status.. Protocols established No. of countries with provisions for alternatives to incarceration such as public work programmes, with an accreditation system Protocols available Reports Outcome 3: Drug trafficking and related challenges to human security counteracted by supporting Member States and RECs to reduce trends of illicit trafficking and drug supply in accordance with fundamental human rights principles and the rule of law Output 3.1: Strengthening the legal and policy frameworks in the area of drug trafficking and related crime prevention Gap analysis conducted and recommendations made; Number of member states who have received technical assistance provided to harmonize legislation; No. of revised country legal frameworks; Number of Member States that have developed policy and strategic framework; including on international cooperation; ; No. of countries that have operational plan. Member States Focal Point (MSFP) Annual Reports. Political will Capacity Cooperation with and technical assistance from partners

Output 3.2: Strategic information Update information on trends and patterns on drug Member States monitoring Political will (including research, surveys and trafficking and use; reports; data collection on illicit production, AUC statistical data base; AUC reports on trafficking Capacity trafficking and supply trends) New data sources such as CEWS and threat trends. generated and updated for improved assessments; understanding and enhanced ability Studies conducted by UNAFRI, academic and other to respond to the challenges of drug specialised institutions. production, trafficking, demand and supply Output 3.3: Epidemiological information on drug trafficking available from surveillance networks mentioned under output Output 3.4: Advocacy for policy development at the continental, regional and national levels covering prevention of drug trafficking and related offences and international cooperation. Output 3.5: Evidence based public awareness and community involvement carried out covering the prevention of drug use, trafficking and related offences Availability of annual data on seizures (levels and routes), cultivation and manufacturing disaggregated by drug type; Availability of data on drug purity and price; Threat assessments in at least 50% of the five (5) AU regions; Continental, regional, national and community Drug Early Warning systems Data on emerging threats (counterfeits, diversion of precursors and ATS) Number of member states included in the epidemiological network No. of M/S reporting on: Seizures, arrests, prosecution convictions confiscation of proceeds of crimes Mutual Legal Assistance(MLA) Arrestees into alternatives to incarceration programmes HONLEA meetings reports Continental sentencing guidelines disseminated No. of countries that have drug control strategies including public awareness and community involvement No. of conutries undertaking community awareness and stigma reduction campaigns Member States monitoring reports; INCB reports; AUC reports on trends. UNODC reports Member States Focal Point (MSFP) Annual Reports HONLEA reports Member States Focal Point (MSFP) Annual Reports. Political will Capacity Law enforcement to shift to quality arrests and diversion programmes to cater for arrestees with drug possession for personal consumption Outcome 4: Capacity building in research and data collection enhanced through strengthening of institutions to respond effectively to challenges posed by illicit drugs, and to facilitate the licit movement of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances for medical and scientific purposes

Output 4.1: Improved capacities of criminal justice system to investigate and prosecute as well as take other measures to contain drug related organized crimes Output 4.2: Barriers limiting availability of internationally controlled drugs for medical and scientific purposes removed No. of countries that have developed inter-agency cooperation mechanism Training programmes for law enforcement Training programmes for prosecutors Training programmes for judges and magistrates, including on alternatives to imprisonment Training for (Civil Society)providers of legal aid support No. of countries having in place mechanisms to combat corruption No. of countries establishing informants and witness protection programmes EAPCCO, SARPCCO, WACI platforms Continental increase in successful prosecutions No. of countries applying to the INCB for their adequate requirements of internationally controlled drugs for medical and scientific purpose No. of countries participating in PIN online training Assessment reports Training reports Activity reports EARPCCO, SARPCCO WACI reports INCB reports Political will Funding Capacity Cooperation with and technical assistance from partners Countries not applying for INCB quota Output 4.3 Capacity for control of precursor chemicals by Member States Number of Member States with relevant legislations Number of Member States with national institutional framework for precursor control No. of clandestine laboratories dismantled Member states reports

Output 4.4: Continental Common Position related to capacity building in prevention, treatment, research and surveillance developed 4.4.1 Formulation of Continental Common Position on capacity building in prevention, treatment, research and surveillance 4.4.2. Adoption of the various AU policy and protocol documents, and minimum standards for treatment, by the African Union Conference of Ministers in Charge of Drug Control 4.4.3 Mainstreaming of drug use prevention and treatment modules in curricula of institutions of learning 4.4.4 Training in drug use prevention and treatment for relevant governmental and non-governmental institutions Continental common position on capacity building in prevention, treatment, research and surveillance available AU policy and protocol documents, and minimum standards for prevention, treatment, research and surveillance adopted by the African Union Conference of Ministers in Charge of Drug Control No. of countries adopting AU policy and protocol documents, and minimum standards for prevention, treatment, research and surveillance No. of countries reporting mainstreaming of drug use prevention and treatment modules in curricula of institutions of learning No. of countries reporting on training in drug use prevention and treatment for relevant governmental and non- governmental institutions No. of countries reporting scientifically sound research activities on drug use No of partners providing capacity building in the above domains AU policy and protocol documents available Reports of countries adopting Au policy and protocol document Research reports (e.g. human, financials and 4.4.5 Mobilize and strengthen national capacities to conduct scientifically sound research and set-up surveillance system Output 4.5 Continental Common Position relating to the availability of adequate pain medication agreed Continental Common Position relating to the availability of adequate pain medication adopted by the African Union Conference of Ministers in Charge of Drug Control Document available Reports of implementation (e.g. human, financial and