David L. Urdal, Ph.D. Chief Scientific Officer The Development of Sipuleucel-T (Provenge ) for Active Cellular Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Similar documents
David L. Urdal, Ph.D. Chief Scientific Officer Sipuleucel-T for the Active Cellular Immunotherapy of Prostate Cancer

Dendritic Cell Based Cancer Vaccine Development

Summary of Phase 3 IMPACT Trial Results Presented at AUA Meeting Webcast Conference Call April 28, Nasdaq: DNDN

Updated Results of the IMPACT. Metastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC)

Mitchell H. Gold, M.D. President and CEO. 2 nd Annual African American Prostate Cancer Disparity Summit September 22, 2006

Policy. not covered Sipuleucel-T. Considerations Sipuleucel-T. Description Sipuleucel-T. be medically. Sipuleucel-T. covered Q2043.

Name of Policy: Cellular Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Lower Baseline PSA Predicts Greater Benefit From Sipuleucel-T

When exogenous testosterone therapy is. adverse responses can be induced.

Immunotherapy Therapy for Prostate Cancer

sipuleucel-t (Provenge )

When exogenous testosterone therapy is. adverse responses can be induced.

Group Sequential Design: Uses and Abuses

Immunotherapy of Prostate Cancer

Corporate Medical Policy Cellular Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Prostate Cancer 2009 MDV Anti-Angiogenesis. Anti-androgen Radiotherapy Surgery Androgen Deprivation Therapy. Docetaxel/Epothilone

Evolution of Chemotherapy for. Cancer

US Regulatory Considerations for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines

U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR BIOLOGICS EVALUATION AND RESEARCH

Vaccine Therapy for Cancer

Ipilimumab ASCO Data Review and Discussion Webcast. Monday, June 2, 2008

Prostate Cancer Panel. June 2018

Management Options in Advanced Prostate Cancer: What is the Role for Sipuleucel-T?

Prostate Cancer Vaccine - Provenge AHM

African American Men and Prostate Cancer Management Option for Clinical PROSPECT Trial Participation in an Immunotherapy Study

A SPECIAL MEETING REVIEW EDITION. Special Reporting on: PLUS Meeting Abstract Summaries. With Expert Commentary by:

Phase II Clinical Trial of GM-CSF Treatment in Patients with Hormone-Refractory or Hormone-Naïve Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate


Dendritic Cell Based Immunotherapy for Cancer. Edgar G. Engleman, M.D.

Protocol. This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

Lecture 17: Vaccines (Therapeutic and Prophylactic Types)

Early Chemotherapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Summary... 2 GENITOURINARY TUMOURS - PROSTATE... 3

Session VI A: Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Approach: a key to success

Management of Incurable Prostate Cancer in 2014

Reprogramming Tumor Associated Dendritic Cells for Immunotherapy

Session 4 Chemotherapy for castration refractory prostate cancer First and second- line chemotherapy

August 2012 Volume 10, Issue 8, Supplement 12

Corporate Overview. May 2017 NASDAQ: CYTR

July, ArQule, Inc.

Management of castrate resistant disease: after first line hormone therapy fails

POSITIVE CHMP OPINION FOR XTANDI (ENZALUTAMIDE) IN ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER 1

The Role of Immunotherapy in Prostate Cancer: What s Trending?

CBER Regulatory Considerations for Clinical Development of Immunotherapies in Oncology

CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY GUIDELINES (PROSTATE)

BAVARIAN NORDIC BIO DEUTSCHLAND PRESENTATION OCTOBER 2014 CSE/OMX:BAVA, OTC:BVNRY

Philip Kantoff, MD Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

See accompanying editorial on page J Clin Oncol 28: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Exploring Immunotherapies: Beyond Checkpoint Inhibitors

Saad et al [12] Metastatic CRPC. Bhoopalam et al [14] M0 PCa on ADT <1 yr vs >1 yr ADT

EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC

Recent Progress in Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer

Patients Living Longer: The Promise of Newer Therapies

The Return of My Cancer -Emerging Effective Therapies Jianqing Lin, MD

AVEO and Astellas Announce Positive Findings from TIVO-1 Superiority Study of Tivozanib in First-Line Advanced RCC

Modern Screening and Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer John Tuckey

Learn how to JUMPSTART YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM

DISCLOSURE SLIDE. ARGOS: research funding, scientific advisory board

Please consider the following information on ZYTIGA (abiraterone acetate). ZYTIGA - Compendia Communication - NCCN LATITUDE and STAMPEDE June 2017

SESSIONE PLATINUM SERIES (Best Papers Poster o Abstract on Prostate Cancer) In Oncologia

Timing of targeted therapy in patients with low volume mrcc. Eli Rosenbaum Davidoff Cancer Center Beilinson Hospital

THE FUTURE OF VACCINES ASCO ANNUAL MEETING JUNE 4, 2016

2 nd line Therapy and Beyond NSCLC. Alan Sandler, M.D. Oregon Health & Science University

JUMPSTART YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM TO ATTACK YOUR ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER

Perspective on endocrine and chemotherapy agents. Cora N. Sternberg Department of Medical Oncology San Camillo & Forlanini Hospitals Rome, Italy

LION. Corporate Presentation June 2016 BIOTECHNOLOGIES. Leadership & Innovation in Oncology

What will change for men with advanced prostate cancer in the next 24 months? ESO Observatory: Perspective on endocrine and chemotherapy agents

8/31/ ) Intermittent androgen deprivation in androgen-sensitive PCa. 1) Alpharadin (Ra223) in CRPC with bone metastases

Published on The YODA Project (

Targeted Agents as Maintenance Therapy. Karen Kelly, MD Professor of Medicine UC Davis Cancer Center

Challenging Genitourinary Tumors: What s New in 2017

Idera Pharmaceuticals

PROMISE 1 Top-Line Data Results. June 27, 2017

SIMPOSIO. Radioterapia stereotassica e nuovi farmaci nel tumore e della prostata metastatico

mcrpc 2014 TRA EVOLUZIONE E RIVOLUZIONE: COME ORIENTARSI NEL LABIRINTO DELLE TERAPIE

The State of Cancer Care: Reflections from the 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Until 2004, CRPC was consistently a rapidly lethal disease.

Francesco Massari Oncologia Medica Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi

Cowen Annual Healthcare Conference. March 2018

PTAC meeting held on 5 & 6 May (minutes for web publishing)

Novel treatment for castration-resistant prostate cancer

SYSTEMIC THERAPIES FOR CRPC: Chemotherapy and Radium-223

Sequencing Strategies in Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (MCRPC)

LONDON CANCER NEW DRUGS GROUP RAPID REVIEW

Determined to realize a future in which people with cancer live longer and better than ever before

Clinical: Ipilimumab (MDX-010) Update and Next Steps

Incorporating New Agents into the Treatment Paradigm for Prostate Cancer

STUDY FINDINGS PRESENTED ON TAXOTERE REGIMENS IN HEAD AND NECK, LUNG AND BREAST CANCER

Chemohormonal Therapy For Prostate Cancer. What is old, is new again!

Investor Presentation

Evolution or revolution in the treatment of prostate cancer

Media Release. Basel, 17 May 2018

New Treatment Options for Prostate Cancer

Van Cutsem E et al. Proc ASCO 2009;Abstract LBA4509.

Timing of Androgen Deprivation: The Modern Debate Must be conducted in the following Contexts: 1. Clinical States Model

INTERIM RESULTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2014 CSE/OMX:BAVA, OTC:BVNRY

ASCO Analyst & Investor Webcast. June 1, 2018

CORPORATE PRESENTATION

Abiraterone for castration-resistantation-resistant. treated with a docetaxel-containingel-containing

Immunotherapy for Genitourinary Cancers. Douglas McNeel, MD PhD Professor of Medicine University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Madison, WI

Transcription:

David L. Urdal, Ph.D. Chief Scientific Officer The Development of Sipuleucel-T (Provenge ) for Active Cellular Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer isbtc 22 nd Annual Meeting, Boston November 4, 2007 1

Forward Looking Statements This presentation includes forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward looking statements by their nature involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions inherent in discussing future events and trends. Information concerning risk factors that may affect such statements can be obtained in the Company s SEC filings. 2

Presenter Disclosure Information David L. Urdal The following relationships exist related to this presentation: I am employed by Dendreon I own stock in Dendreon I will be discussing development of a Dendreon product candidate 3

The Sipuleucel-T Experience Introduction to Prostate Cancer and Sipuleucel-T Development Clinical results Regulatory milestones Conclusions 4

Natural History of Prostate Cancer Chemotherapy Death Castration Tumor volume & activity Local Therapy Asymptomatic Non-Metastatic Androgen Dependent Metastatic Symptomatic Androgen Independent Time 5

Androgen-Independent (Hormone-Refractory) Prostate Cancer Remains Unmet Medical Need Deadly disease Modest survival advantage seen with docetaxel-based regimens Majority of patients reject chemotherapy due to QOL impact Novel treatment approaches with acceptable safety profiles are needed 6

Sipuleucel-T Sipuleucel-T is an autologous investigational active cellular immunotherapy product that activates the immune system against prostate cancer 7

Sipuleucel-T: Patient-Specific Product Day 1 Leukapheresis Day 2-3 sipuleucel-t is manufactured Day 3-4 Patient is infused Apheresis Center Dendreon Doctor s Office COMPLETE COURSE OF THERAPY: Weeks 0, 2, 4 8

Pre-Clinical Rationale Antigen-loaded APCs isolated from peripheral blood showed clinical promise in lymphoma Prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) highly expressed in prostate tissue Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM- CSF) activates APCs Rat APCs, loaded with PAP+GM-CSF fusion protein, induced prostatitis Hsu et al., (1996) Nat. Med. 2:52-58 Laus et al., (2001) Can. Res. Ther. Cont. 11:1-10 9

Sipuleucel-T is Active in a Preclinical Model of Autoimmune Prostatitis Untreated rprovengetreated Laus R et al. Cancer Res Therapy and Control 2001,11:1-10 10

Sipuleucel-T: autologous APC cultured with PAP-cytokine fusion protein Recombinant Prostatic Acid Phosphatase (PAP) antigen combines with resting antigen presenting cell (APC) APC takes up the antigen Antigen is processed and presented on surface of the APC Fully activated, the APC is now sipuleucel-t INFUSE PATIENT Active T-cell Inactive T-cell T-cells proliferate and attack cancer cells Sipuleucel-T activates T-cells in the body The precise mechanism of sipuleucel-t in prostate cancer has not been established. 11

Key Product Components and Attributes Mononuclear Cells Total nucleated cell (TNC) count CD54 positive cells take up antigen CD54 positive cells present antigen to PAP specific T cells CD54 upregulates during culture with antigen Recombinant Antigen Specified concentration in culture Manufactured under GMP conditions Well characterized biologic 12

The Sipuleucel-T Experience Introduction to Prostate Cancer and Sipuleucel-T Development Clinical results Regulatory milestones Conclusions 13

Results: Sipuleucel-T Phases 1 & 2 Trials (Mayo Clinic and UCSF) Safety No dose limiting toxicities Treatment well tolerated Immune Responses Regimen: maximum immune responses reached after 3 infusions T cell responses were specific [not increased to recall flu antigen or KLH] Small EJ, et al., J Clin Onc 2000;18:3894-3903 14

Phase 1 and 2 Trials-- Clinical Effects PSA decline of > 50% in 6/62 (10%) of AIPCa patients Objective (bidimensional mass) response observed Immune responses correlated with prolonged time to objective progression Prolongs PSADT in ADPC Burch PA, et al., Clin Cancer Res 6:2175, 2000 Small EJ, et al., J Clin Oncol 18:3894, 2000 Burch PA, et al., Prostate 60:197, 2004 Rini BI, et al., Cancer 107: 67, 2006 15

The Phase 3 Plan Two identical Phase 3 multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trials D9901 D9902A Target population: asymptomatic, metastatic androgen independent prostate cancer Well-defined manufacturing process Potency and other release specifications established 16

Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials, Studies D9901 and D9902 Asymptomatic Metastatic Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer 2:1 Sipuleucel-T Q 2 weeks x 3 Placebo Q 2 weeks x 3 P R O G R E S S I O N Treated at Physician discretion Treated at Physician discretion and/or Salvage Protocol S U R V I V A L Primary endpoint: Planned analysis: Time to Disease Progression Radiographic, Clinical or Pain Not PSA Overall Survival 17

D9901 Primary Efficacy Analysis (ITT) Time from Randomization to Disease Progression Probability of Non-progression 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 Sipuleucel-T (n=82) Placebo (n=45) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Time to Progression, weeks p = 0.052 (log rank) HR = 1.4 Small EJ, Schellhammer PF, Higano CS, et. al. Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Immunologic Therapy with Sipuleucel-T (APC8015) in Patients with Metastatic, Asymptomatic Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3089-3094, 2006 18

Sipuleucel-T Overall 3-Year Survival Intent-to-Treat Study D9901 100 75 p-value = 0.01 (log rank) HR = 1.7 Median Survival Benefit = 4.5 months Percent Survival 50 25 Placebo (n=45) Median Survival: 21.4 mos. Sipuleucel-T (n=82) Median Survival: 25.9 mos. 34% 0 11% 0 10 20 30 40 Survival (months) Small EJ, Schellhammer PF, Higano CS, et. al. Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Immunologic Therapy with Sipuleucel-T (APC8015) in Patients with Metastatic, Asymptomatic Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3089-3094, 2006 19

Phase 3 Study Key Findings Study D9901 31% delay in time to progression (p-value = 0.052; HR = 1.45) 41% overall reduction in risk of death Median survival benefit: 4.5 months (p-value = 0.01; HR = 1.70) 20

Sensitivity Analyses to Test Survival Result Robustness Balance and consistency in study subpopulations Adjustment for baseline prognostic factors Assessment of chemotherapy use and timing following study treatment Prostate cancer-specific survival 21

Balance of Treatment Arms Halabi Analysis, Study D9901 Group N Predicted Survival (months) + Observed Survival (months) Sipuleucel-T 82 20.1 25.9 Placebo 45 19.9 21.4 + Median of predicted survivals, as calculated using model of Halabi et al., JCO 2003 Source: Small, EJ, Prostate Cancer Foundation Scientific Retreat, 2006 22

Treatment Effect Consistent Across Subpopulations Favors sipuleucel-t Age (Above Median) (Below Median) Alk. Phos. (Above Median) (Below Median) PSA (Above Median) (Below Median) LDH (Above Median) (Below Median) Hemoglobin (Above Median) (Below Median) Weight (Above Median) (Below Median) Loc. Dis.-Bone Only or ST Only Bone and ST Met. Lesions ( 10) (>10) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) 23

Adjustment for Multiple Prognostic Factors LDH PSA # bone metastases Weight Localization of disease 24

Survival Benefit Confirmed by Adjustment for Multiple Prognostic Factors Favors sipuleucel-t unadjusted 1.71 Treatment Effect p-value p = 0.010 adjusted 2.16 p = 0.002 0 1 2 3 4 5 Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) 25

Chemotherapy Use Following Study Treatment Does Not Explain Survival Benefit No evidence of a difference in docetaxel use sipuleucel-t placebo Chemotherapy 56% 63% Docetaxel 37% 49% No evidence of a delay in time to docetaxel initiation in placebo arm Treatment effect remained strong: In study subpopulations based on docetaxel use After adjustment for docetaxel use 26

Prostate Cancer Specific Survival Study D9901 % Free of Prostate Cancer Death 100% 75% 50% Sipuleucel-T (n=82) Placebo (n=45) P = 0.002 (log rank) HR = 2.04 [95% CI: 1.30, 3.19] 25% 0% 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 Months 27

Survival Results Confirmed by Multiple Sensitivity Analyses Favors sipuleucel-t Survival 1.71 Adj. for prognostic factors 2.16 Adj. for docetaxel 1.54 PCa-specific survival 2.04 0 1 2 3 4 5 Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) 28

Clinically Significant and Statistically Persuasive Overall Survival Benefit 100 sipuleucel-t (n=82) placebo (n=45) 75 50 25 Median benefit 4.5 months p = 0.010 (log rank) HR = 1.71 [95% CI: 1.13, 2.58] 34% 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 11% 29

Sipuleucel-T Laboratory/Clinical Correlations Key product attributes: Total nucleated cell count CD54 count CD54 upregulation Fully activated, the APC is now sipuleucel-t INFUSE PATIENT Active T-cell Inactive T-cell The precise mechanism of sipuleucel-t in prostate cancer has not been established. Sipuleucel-T activates T-cells in the body 30

CD54 Upregulation Potency Assay for APCs APCs cultured with recombinant antigen CD54 Pre-culture Post-culture Mean Fluorescence Intensity 31

CD54 Upregulation by Treatment Week Phase 3 Manufacturing Data 30 CD54 Upregulation Ratio 25 20 15 10 5 0 Week 0 Week 2 Week 4 32

Correlation Analysis for Key Product Attributes and Survival, Integrated Studies 1 & 2 Variable CD54 Upregulation p-value N = 146 0.009 Total Nucleated Cells 0.018 33

Survival by Cumulative CD54 Upregulation in Quartiles, Integrated Studies 1 & 2 Percent survival 100 75 50 25 75 th percentile 50 th to 75 th percenitle 25 th to 50 th percentile 25 th percentile 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 Months 34

Correlation analysis for Key Product Attributes and Survival Unadjusted p-value with p-value Adjustment* Variable N = 146 N = 134 CD54 Upregulation 0.009 0.022 Total Nucleated Cells 0.018 0.138 *Adjusted for 5 prognostic factors in Cox regression model 35

Sipuleucel-T Potency Correlates with Survival Biologically relevant product measurement Independent of prognostic factors May support the efficacy findings 36

Sipuleucel-T Induces Significant T-cell Mediated Immune Response (Week 0 to Week 8) Median Stimulation Index Ratio 18 p = 0.0003 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Sipuleucel-T (Mean = 16.9) Placebo (Mean = 1.99) Presented at ASCO 2003 37

Sipuleucel-T is Well Tolerated Event [n(%)] Sipuleucel-T (n=82) Placebo (n=45) p-value Grade 1-2 Grade 3-4 Grade 1-2 Grade 3-4 Rigors (chills) 45 (54.9) 4 (4.9) 4 (8.9) 0 (0.0) <0.001 Pyrexia (fever) 22 (26.8) 2 (2.4) 1 (2.2) 0 (0.0) 0.0001 Tremor 8 (9.8) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.0497 Feeling Cold 7 (8.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.0505 Phase 3 Trial D9901 38

The Sipuleucel-T Experience Introduction to Sipuleucel-T process and characterization Development Clinical results Regulatory milestones Conclusions 39

Sipuleucel-T Proposed Basis for Licensure Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled studies Primary Evidence: D9901 Survival Statistically robust, internally consistent findings Confirmed in multiple sensitivity analyses Time to disease progression Trend toward a delay Supportive evidence Trend in overall survival in D9902A Integrated analyses Survival correlates with product potency Demonstrated safety and tolerability 40

Regulatory Milestones The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies (OCTGT) September 2005: Pre-BLA Meeting held with FDA: Survival benefit observed in Study D9901 Supported by D9902A and the absence of significant toxicity Will serve as the clinical basis of a BLA for sipuleucel-t November 2005: FDA granted Fast Track Status for sipuleucel-t 41

Regulatory Milestones (continued) August November 2006: Submit rolling BLA January 2007: BLA accepted for Priority Review March 2007: FDA s Cell, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee 42

Cell, Tissue and Gene Therapy Advisory Committee Key Questions to the Committee Is sipuleucel-t reasonably safe for the intended patient population? 17 yes 0 no Has substantial evidence of efficacy been established? 13 yes 4 no 43

The Preliminary Outcome Complete Response Letter May 8, 2007 Request for additional clinical and CMC information 44

Sipuleucel-T Studies in Prostate Cancer Study Phase No. of Subjects Results Early Stage Androgen Dependent D9905 Phase 2 19 Sipuleucel-T may lead to improved PSADT Increase in median PSADT of 51% P-16 Phase 2 22 Sipuleucel-T plus Avastin increased PSADT Increase in median PSADT of 85% P-11 Phase 3 ~175 Data suggest a potential role for sipuleucel-t in ADPC Increase in median PSADT of 35% (P = 0.046) Androgen Independent D9901 Phase 3 127 4.5 month median survival benefit for men who received sipuleucel-t Advanced Stage D9902A Phase 3 98 3.3 month median survival benefit for men who received sipuleucel-t D9902B Phase 3 500 Patient accrual complete in 2007 Complete Preliminary Enrolled 45

IMPACT Phase 3 Study (D9902B) IMmunotherapy for Prostate AdenoCarcinoma Treatment Randomized 2:1, double-blind, placebo-controlled ~500 men with minimally symptomatic, metastatic AIPC Enrolling at ~70 sites in North America Primary endpoint: Survival Secondary endpoint: Time to objective disease progression Special Protocol Assessment Positive interim or final survival analysis sufficient to amend BLA 46

Sipuleucel-T Phase 3 Study: Conclusions An ITT analysis of survival demonstrated that compared with Placebo, sipuleucel-t: Provided a survival advantage of 4.5 months Resulted in a significantly greater percentage of patients alive at 36 months (34% vs 11%) There is a trend towards improved median time to progression in asymptomatic AIPC patients treated with sipuleucel-t, compared with placebo (P = 0.052, Hazard Ratio = 1.45) 47

Sipuleucel-T Phase 3 Study: Conclusions Survival results represent mature data set Survival data not explained by differences in: Non-prostate cancer related deaths Imbalance in baseline prognostic factors Subsequent chemotherapy use or timing following treatment Potency may correlate with survival outcome Consistent results between studies 48

Sipuleucel-T Phase 3 Study: Conclusions Rapid tumor progression prior to onset of immune effect may explain discordance between effect of sipuleucel-t on time to progression and its effect on overall survival TTP may not be the most appropriate endpoint for clinical studies in patients treated with immunotherapy agents like sipuleucel-t Sipuleucel-T is well tolerated and has a favorable toxicity profile Sipuleucel-T results in a significant T cell mediated immune response Sipuleucel-T represents the first non-chemotherapeutic agent that may provide a survival advantage in AIPC patients 49

Active Cellular Immunotherapy: A Potential New Treatment for Prostate Cancer Chemotherapy Death Castration Immunotherapies (sipuleucel-t) Tumor volume & activity Local Therapy Asymptomatic Non-Metastatic Androgen Dependent Metastatic Symptomatic Androgen Independent Time 50

Acknowledgements Paul F. Schellhammer, MD Eastern Virginia Medical Center, Norfolk, VA Patrick A. Burch, MD - Mayo Clinic & Foundation Celestia Higano, MD Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA Eric J. Small, MD UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA Charles Redfern, MD Sharp Health Care, San Diego, CA James Arseneau, MD Albany Regional Cancer Center, Albany, NY Sebastian George, MD Cancer & Blood Institute, Palm Desert, CA John Nemunaitis, MD US Oncology, Dallas, TX Richard J. Rosenbluth, MD Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ Wayne Poll, MD AKSM Clinical Research Corp, Columbus, OH Steven P. Anthony, MD Cancer Care Northwest, Spokane, WA Dendreon Staff: Frank Valone, M.D.,Jelle Kylstra, M.D., Reiner Laus, M.D., Elizabeth Smith, M.V. Peshwa, Ph.D., Lori Jones, Ph.D., Israel Rios, M.D., Robert Hershberg, M.D., Mark Frohlich, M.D., Nicole Provost, Ph.D. 51