Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium carbonate (soda ash) for all species 1

Similar documents
Scientific Opinion on the modification of the terms of authorisation of Protural (sodium benzoate) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of VevoVitall (Benzoic acid) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

Statement on the safety and efficacy of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological feed additive for dogs and cats 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the modification to the formulation of GalliPro and compatibility with formic acid 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for dairy buffaloes 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin (Bacillus subtilis) as a feed additive for piglets 1

Statement on the preparation of guidance for the assessment of plant/herbal products and their constituents used as feed additives 1

Safety and efficacy of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as feed additive for lambs for fattening 1,2

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc 47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for pigs for fattening 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium hydroxide for dogs, cats and ornamental fish 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of InteSwine (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1,2

Scientific Opinion on the Safety and Efficacy of thaumatin for all animal species 1

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 10 July 2007

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30236) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 3 February 2009

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 3,4

Session 47.

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of synthetic alpha-tocopherol for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 October 2007

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of erythrosine in feed for cats and dogs, ornamental fish and reptiles 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for leisure horses 1

Safety of the enzymatic preparation Natuphos (3-phytase) for sows 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 288, 1-7

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of MycoCell (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for dairy cows 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 289, 1-6

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus brevis (DSMZ 21982) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Avizyme 1505 (endo-1,4-β-xylanase, α-amylase, subtilisin) as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 287, 1-9

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 22963) as a silage additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Bonvital (Enterococcus faecium) as a feed additive for dogs 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Natugrain Wheat TS (endo-1,4-β-xylanase) for use as feed additive for chickens for fattening and ducks 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Mn) as feed additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Pediococcus pentosaceus (DSM 12834) as a silage additive for all species 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 262, 1-6

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (DSM 12836) as a silage additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 19 September 2007

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question N EFSA-Q )

EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements. Community Reference Laboratory for

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of allylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 18) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2004) 96, 1-5

The EFSA Journal (2005) 171, 1-5

The EFSA Journal (2006) 385, 1-9

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Formi LHS (potassium diformate) as a feed additive for sows 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q )

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a copper chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Cu) as feed additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 12856) as a silage additive for all species 1

Maximum Residue Limits for Clinacox 0.5% (diclazuril) for turkeys for fattening, chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2, 3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus kefiri (DSM 19455) as a silage additive for all animal species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of anthranilate derivatives (chemical group 27) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

The EFSA Journal (2006) 406, 1-11

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2005) 231, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2005) 207, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2006) 384, 1-9

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Safety of Allura Red AC in feed for cats and dogs

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 11 July 2007

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of diclazuril (Clinacox 0.5 %) as feed additive for chickens reared for laying 1

Safety and efficacy of Mintrex Zn (Zinc chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine) as feed additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of L-cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate as a flavouring additive for pets 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS (6-phytase) as a feed additive for finfish. Abstract

Scientific Opinion on the efficacy of Suilectin (Phaseolus vulgaris lectins) as a zootechnical additive for suckling piglets (performance enhancer)

Withdrawal period for Coxidin for chickens and turkeys for fattening and re-examination of the provisional Maximum Residue Limit 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 2 April 2009

Official Journal of the European Union

EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol as a feed additive for poultry and pigs 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Scientific Opinion on safety and efficacy of di copper chloride tri hydroxide (tribasic copper chloride, TBCC) as feed additive for all species 1

REASONED OPINION. European Food Safety Authority 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Safety and efficacy of Mintrex Mn (Manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine) as feed additive for all species 1

Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Brilliant Blue FCF (E133) as a feed additive for cats and dogs 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium bisulphate (SBS) for all species as preservative and silage additive 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 40027) as a silage additive for all animal species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 November 2008 by the FEEDAP Panel and on 29 October 2008 by the GMO Panel

Transcription:

SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium carbonate (soda ash) for all species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy SUMMARY Following a request from the European Commission, the European Food Safety Authority was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium carbonate (soda ash) used as technological feed additive (functional group acidity regulator) for all animal species. It is an approved food additive without restrictions. On the basis of the existing use in food, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in animal Feed (FEEDAP) concludes that sodium carbonate is safe for all animal species, the consumers and the users. At levels typically used in animal feed, sodium carbonate is not expected either to pose a risk for the environment. Sodium carbonate is a well-known component of many buffer solutions. However, the relevance of its buffering capacity in feed materials is not demonstrated. KEY WORDS Technological additive, acidity regulator, sodium carbonate, soda ash, safety, efficacy 1 On request from European Commission, Question No EFSA-Q-2008-694, adopted on 13 July 2010. 2 Panel members: Gabriele Aquilina, Georges Bories, Paul Brantom, Andrew Chesson, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Joop de Knecht, Noël Albert Dierick, Mikolaj Antoni Gralak, Jürgen Gropp, Ingrid Halle, Reinhard Kroker, Lubomir Leng, Sven Lindgren, Anne-Katrine Lundebye Haldorsen, Alberto Mantovani, Miklós Mézes, Derek Renshaw and Maria Saarela Correspondence: FEEDAP@efsa.europa.eu 3 Acknowledgement: The Panel wishes to thank the members of the Working Group on Technological Additives, including Bogdan Debski, for the preparation of this opinion. Suggested citation: EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium carbonate (soda ash) for all species.. [8 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1695. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu European Food Safety Authority, 2010 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary... 1 Key words... 1 Table of contents... 2 Background... 3 Terms of reference... 3 Assessment... 5 1. Introduction... 5 2. Characterisation... 5 2.1. Characterisation of the product... 5 2.2. Stability and homogeneity... 5 2.3. Conditions of use... 6 2.4. Evaluation of the analytical methods by the Community Reference Laboratory (CRL)... 6 3. Safety... 6 3.1. Safety for the target species... 6 3.2. Safety for the consumer and user... 6 3.3. Safety for the environment... 6 4. Efficacy... 6 Conclusions and recommendations... 6 Documentation provided to EFSA... 6 References... 7 2

BACKGROUND Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 4 establishes the rules governing the Community authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition. In particular, Article 4(1) of that Regulation lays down that any person seeking authorisation for a feed additive or for a new use of a feed additive shall submit an application in accordance with Article 7. The European Commission received a request from the company EuSalt aisbl 5 for authorisation of the product sodium carbonate (soda ash) to be used as a feed additive for all species (category: technological additive; functional group: acidity regulator) under the conditions mentioned in Table 1. According to Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, the Commission forwarded the application to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) as an application under Article 4(1) (authorisation of a feed additive or new use of a feed additive). EFSA received directly from the applicant the technical dossier in support of this application. 6 According to Article 8 of that Regulation, EFSA, after verifying the particulars and documents submitted by the applicant, shall undertake an assessment in order to determine whether the feed additive complies with the conditions laid down in Article 5. The particulars and documents in support of the application were considered valid by EFSA as of 17 July 2009. The additive is a chemically synthesised sodium carbonate. This product is currently authorised for its use in dogs and cats (E 500(i)) (authorisation to expire on 7 November 2010). TERMS OF REFERENCE According to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, EFSA shall determine whether the feed additive complies with the conditions laid down in Article 5. EFSA shall deliver an opinion on the safety for the target animals, consumer, user and the environment and the efficacy of the product sodium carbonate (soda ash), when used under the conditions described in Table 1. 4 5 6 OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 29. Avenue de l Yser 4, B-1040, Brussels, Belgium. EFSA Dossier reference: FAD-2008-0045. 3

Table 1: Description and conditions of use of the additive as proposed by the applicant Additive Registration number/ec No/No (if appropriate) Category(ies) of additive Functional group(s) of additive Sodium Carbonate E500(i) Technical additive Acidity regulator Composition, description Chemical formula Description Purity criteria (if appropriate) Method of analysis (if appropriate) Sodium Carbonate Na2CO3 Technical grade ph-titration Trade name (if appropriate) Name of the holder of authorisation (if appropriate) Soda Ash EuSalt aisbl Species or category of animal Maximum Age Conditions of use Minimum content Maximum content mg/kg of complete feedingstuffs Withdrawal period (if appropriate) All species or categories of not relevant 0 400 not relevant animals Other provisions and additional requirements for the labelling Specific conditions or restrictions no specific conditions for use (if appropriate) Specific conditions or restrictions no specific conditions for handling (if appropriate) Post-market monitoring (if not relevant appropriate) Specific conditions for use in complementary feedingstuffs not relevant (if appropriate) Marker residue Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) (if appropriate) Species or category of animal Target tissue(s) or food products Maximum content in tissues Not relevant Not relevant Not relevant Not relevant 4

ASSESSMENT 1. Introduction Sodium carbonate is currently authorised as a feed additive (acidity regulator) for dogs and cats by Directive 70/524/EEC 7 without maximum content and age limit for those animal species. The present application relates to the use of sodium carbonate in all animal species as a technological additive, functional group acidity regulator. Sodium carbonate is authorised without maximum content for use in food (Regulation 1925/2006/EC) 8 and food supplements (Directive 2002/46/EC). 9 It is also used in cosmetics, soaps, scouring powders, soaking and washing powders. 2. Characterisation 2.1. Characterisation of the product The product consists of sodium carbonate (synonym soda ash, CAS N 497-19-8), without carrier materials. The additive is specified to contain 99.5 % sodium carbonate, 0.15 % sodium chloride, 0.02 % sodium sulphate, 0.015 % calcium oxide, 0.012 % magnesium oxide and 0.002 % iron (III) oxide. The minimum content of sodium carbonate in the additive is confirmed by the analyses of five batches (range 99.4 99.9 %). 10 Five batches of the product were within the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex (2003) for heavy metals and arsenic. 11 In three batches 12 PCBs contents were below the detection limits (50 ng/kg), dioxins were found in a range of 6.0 to 6.4 ng PCDD/PCDF WHO-TE/kg. The additive is an odourless white powder with 2 % particles larger than 1 mm and 8 % particles smaller than 125 µm, 1.12 % smaller than 100 μm, 0.45 % smaller than 50 μm and 0.29 % smaller than 10 μm, as an average of five batches. 13 The additive is synthesised by the Solvay process using limestone (CaCO 3 ) and brine (NaCl) as starting materials. 2.2. Stability and homogeneity The assessment of the shelf life of inorganic mineral salts like sodium carbonate is not necessary, since those compounds are generally recognised as stable. No data have been submitted to support the stability of the additive in feedingstuffs, but it is not expected to degrade in dry feedingstuffs. Similarly, no evidence has been provided on the capacity of the additive to homogeneously distribute in feedingstuffs. However, the particle size distribution of the additive would probably allow a homogeneous distribution in complete and complementary feedingstuffs (also in livestock feed salt) at the proposed dose range (up to 400 mg/kg). 7 OJ L 270, 14.12.1970, p. 1. 8 OJ L 404, 30.12.2006, p. 26. 9 OJ L 183, 12.7.2002, p. 51. 10 Technical dossier, Supplementary Information, Section II, Annex II_1. 11 Technical dossier, Supplementary Information, Section II, Annex II_2. 12 Technical dossier, Supplementary Information, Section II, Annex II_3. 13 Technical dossier, Supplementary Information, Section II, Annex II_4 and 5. 5

2.3. Conditions of use Sodium carbonate for all species The additive is intended to be used in all animal species/categories (without limitations for age) and without withdrawal period. The applicant recommends to set a maximum content of 400 mg/kg in feed grade salt. 2.4. Evaluation of the analytical methods by the Community Reference Laboratory (CRL) EFSA has verified the CRL report as it relates to the methods used for the control of the active substance in animal feed. The Executive Summary of the CRL report can be found in the Appendix. 3. Safety 3.1. Safety for the target species After intestinal absorption, sodium carbonate provides sodium and CO 3 /HCO 3 ions to the metabolic pathways and body pools. It has limited effect on the acid/base homeostasis in animals. Sodium, as well as CO 2 /HCO 3, is rapidly excreted with water via kidneys (and also faeces and skin) and via respiration, respectively. Sodium carbonate is authorised for use in food without any restriction. A food additive is generally assumed to be also safe for target animals if the intake is not considerably higher than in humans. Because no upper limit for humans exists, a calculation cannot be made, but there is no reason to assume that it would not be safe for the target animals at the levels typically used in animal feed. The FEEDAP Panel concludes that sodium carbonate is safe for all animal species at practical use levels. 3.2. Safety for the consumer and user According to Regulation (EC) No 429/2008, studies concerning the safety for the consumers and the users are generally not necessary for an additive, like sodium carbonate, which is already approved as food additive without any restriction. 3.3. Safety for the environment At levels typically used in animal feed sodium carbonate is not expected to pose a risk for the environment. 4. Efficacy Sodium carbonate is a well-known component of many buffer solutions. However, the relevance of its buffering capacity in feed materials is not demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONCLUSIONS The FEEDAP Panel concludes that sodium carbonate is safe for all animal species, the consumers, the users and the environment. Sodium carbonate is a well-known component of many buffer solutions. However, the relevance of its buffering capacity in feed materials is not demonstrated. DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED TO EFSA 1. Soda ash (sodium carbonate). October 2008. Submitted by EuSalt aisbl. 2. Soda ash. Supplementary information. May 2010. Submitted by EuSalt aisbl. 6

3. Evaluation report of the Community Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives on the methods(s) of analysis for sodium carbonate (Soda ash). 4. Comments from Member States received through the ScienceNet. REFERENCES Food Chemical Codex (FCC), 2003. Food Chemicals Codex, 5th ed. National Academy of Sciences Press. 7

APPENDIX Executive Summary of the Evaluation Report of the Community Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives on the Method(s) of Analysis for sodium carbonate (Soda ash) In the current application authorisation is sought for Sodium Carbonate under the category technological additives, functional group 1(j) as an acidity regulator for all animal species, according to Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. The active agent is sodium carbonate of technical grade with a minimum purity of 99.5%. It is intended to be marketed as a white odourless powder to be incorporated into premixtures and/or complete feedingstuffs to obtain a maximum recommended dosage of sodium carbonate of 400 mg/kg of feedingstuffs for all animal species. For the determination of sodium carbonate in feed additives the applicant proposes the international standard method ISO 740:1976. The method is based on a titrimetric assay for the determination of total soluble alkalinity of sodium carbonate for industrial use. The CRL recommends this ISO method for official controls for the determination of sodium carbonate in feed additives. The unambiguous determination of the content of exogenous sodium carbonate added to the premixtures and the feedingstuffs is not achievable by analysis. Nevertheless, several analytical methods are available for the determination of total sodium and total carbonates in premixtures and in feedingstuffs. Among them, the CRL recommends two international standard methods for official controls: - CEN method EN 15510:2008 for the determination of total sodium and - Community method (Regulation (EC) No 152/2009) for the determination of total carbonates. Further testing or validation is not considered necessary. 8