U.S. EPA Strategic Plan to Promote the Development and Implementation of Alternative Test Methods

Similar documents
Implementation of the US EPA Strategic Plan for New Approach Methodologies and the New Chemicals Program

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Best practices to develop artificial intelligence models for predicting multilevel effects in Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOP)

EPA s Tribal and Indigenous Peoples Environmental Justice Program

GROCERY MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION. Science Forum. Connecting Sound Science and Responsible Solutions

Challenges in environmental risk assessment (ERA) for birds and mammals and link to endocrine disruption (ED) Katharina Ott, BASF SE, Crop Protection

Case Study Application of the WHO Framework for Combined Exposures. Presented by: M.E. (Bette) Meek University of Ottawa

We are concerned that the focus of the document is on the estrogen, androgen, thyroid, and

Multivariate Models for Skin Sensitization Hazard and Potency

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program

PFAS Background and Action Plan. Pennsylvania PFAS Action Team Meeting April 15, 2019

Improving the safety of food contact articles

Contribution to the European Commission s Public Consultation on. 15 January 2015

EFSA Info Session Pesticides 26/27 September Anja Friel EFSA Pesticides Unit (Residues team)

DRAFT COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

Title: Scientific principles for the identification of endocrine disrupting chemicals a consensus statement

Numbers behind Infographic Assuming Future is around 10 years from now For explanation of scaling see the end of the document CURRENT PREDICTIVE POWER

Application of human epidemiological studies to pesticide risk assessment

STUDIES TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF RESIDUES OF VETERINARY DRUGS IN HUMAN FOOD: GENERAL APPROACH TO ESTABLISH AN ACUTE REFERENCE DOSE

Regulatory need for non-animal approaches for skin sensitisation hazard assessment. Janine Ezendam

Thought Starter Combined Exposures to Multiple Chemicals Second International Conference on Risk Assessment

Accelerating the Pace of Chemical Risk Assessments

Bee guidance documents: An end users view. Mark Miles Research & Development Environmental Safety Ecotoxicology Bees

Consultation Response

Committed to Environment, Health, & Safety

Case study 1: The AOP-based two out of three skin sensitization ITS for hazard identification

Survey results - Analysis of higher tier studies submitted without testing proposals

Application of the WHO Framework for Combined Exposures; Implications for Combined Exposures Assessment

Report on the National Pollution Prevention and Toxics Advisory Committee (NPPTAC): The HPV Data Screening Process

Evidence-based environmental decisions: Bridging the gap between epidemiology and risk assessment

Science Policy Notice

Incorporating Computational Approaches into Safety Assessment

Policy Setting Considerations

Committee of Senior Representatives Tenth Meeting Oslo, Norway 11 December 2006

Public Health Masters (MPH) Competencies and Coursework by Major

METHODOLOGIES FOR INTERMITTENT AND SHORT-TERM EXPOSURE TO CARCINOGENS SUBCOMMITTEE

EFSA Statement regarding the EU assessment of glyphosate and the socalled

OpenFoodTox and Other Open Source In silico EFSA. Jean Lou Dorne Senior Scientific Officer Scientific Committee and Emerging Risks Unit EFSA

NEXT GENERATION RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CONSUMER SAFETY OF COSMETICS: A CASE STUDY APPROACH

Draft resolution submitted by the President of the General Assembly

Establishing the Relevance of Health Hazard Data for GHS Classification: Adverse vs. Non-Adverse

Dr. Joerg Feesche November 2016 How to Determine Safety of a Food Contact Adhesive

ENDOCRINE-DISRUPTING CHEMICALS

The role of JECFA for CCFA

How to overcome limitations of new approach methodologies in the context of regulatory science

Genotoxicity Testing Strategies: application of the EFSA SC opinion to different legal frameworks in the food and feed area

A Primer on Acute Inhalation Toxicity Testing

ENFSI ACTION PLAN. PERIOD: REF: BRD-FWK-009 ISSUE NO: 1 DATE: 30 June 2016

The Chronic Cancer Bioassay Is Frequently Conducted for Pesticides When It Is Not Always Needed to Protect Human Health

ETHYLENE OXIDE: AN UPDATE

Parkinson s Research Program

Special Review Decision: Imazapyr

Committed to Environment, Health and Safety

Review of Danish EPA List of EDCs

Intensifying our efforts towards a world free of the avoidable burden of NCDs

Session B: Focus on Higher Hazard Substances

1. IDENTIFICATION. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc. 199 Grandview Road, Skillman, New Jersey Canada: USA:

PROPOSED WORK PROGRAMME FOR THE CLEARING-HOUSE MECHANISM IN SUPPORT OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR BIODIVERSITY Note by the Executive Secretary

Archived Content. This content was archived on June 24, 2013.

7th Mena Influenza Stakeholders Meeting. WHO Influenza Strategy Development and Vaccine-related Research Priorities

Consultation on revised threshold criteria. December 2016

How to use new or revised in vitro test methods to address skin sensitisation

The North American Metal Packaging Alliance

GOOD PHARMACOPOEIAL PRACTICES

FoodDrinkEurope Position on GLP studies

Empowerment, healing and transformation for women moving on from violence

Building Capacity to Create an HIV Prevention Survey for Gay Men in BC: Final Report

PHTHALATES STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT

Risk Management Option Analysis Conclusion Document

New Jersey Department of Human Services Quarterly Newsletter Division of Mental Health Services June 2006

Approaches to Integrating Evidence From Animal and Human Studies in Chemical Assessments

Psychotherapists and Counsellors Professional Liaison Group (PLG) 15 December 2010

Chemical food safety in the U.S. analysis of FDA s scientific basis for assessing chemical risk. Tom Neltner October 9, 2014

Update FDA/Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition

Planning For The FDA s 'Deeming Rule' For E- Cigarettes

In Vitro Lecture and Luncheon. Sponsored by the Colgate Palmolive Company

Peer counselling A new element in the ET2020 toolbox

Revision of GHS Chapter 3.2 to fully incorporate non-animal test methods

Risk assessment of organic verses inorganic arsenic; The toxicity of arsenite and arsenate; and Ongoing bioavailability study.

Potential Impacts Regarding Human Health Risk Assessment

ANIMAL TESTING IN US EPA S CHEMICAL CHALLENGE SCREENING PROGRAM

Methodologies for development of human health criteria and values for the lake Erie drainage basin.

Digest of Dietary Exposure Methodologies in Support of Global MRLS. Cheryl B Cleveland, Ph. D. Global Consumer Safety August 2016

Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion and Toxicology

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Understanding How the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Works USPSTF 101

presents Introduction to Toxicology and its Role in Green Chemistry

Development of safe levels of elemental impurities

IFRA & Safety Assessment of Fragrance Materials

Mercury Dental Amalgam Collection and Recovery U.S. Federal and State Models

Addressing the Challenge of ENDS Regulation. David Graham President & Managing Partner Reveritas Group

Penn State MPH Program Competencies 2013

Youth Justice National Development Team. Youth Justice National Development Team Annual Report. Fiona Dyer

CHARACTERIZING THE IMPACTS OF UNCERTAINTY AND SCIENTIFIC JUDGMENT IN EXPOSURE LIMIT DEVELOPMENT

Webinar: use of alternative methods to animal testing in your REACH registration

(Text with EEA relevance) Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee ( 1 ),

Redesigning the Process for Establishing the Dietary Guidelines for Americans

FLORIDA S NO WRONG DOOR (NWD) SYSTEM PLANNING PROJECT

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) (Question No EFSA-Q )

of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety

Transcription:

U.S. EPA Strategic Plan to Promote the Development and Implementation of Alternative Test Methods Louis Scarano, US EPA SCHC Meeting April 25, 2018 Orlando,FL

Statutory Mandate In 2016, TSCA was amended by the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act: new requirements and deadlines for actions related to the regulation of new and existing chemical substances. new Section 4 (h) entitled Reduction of Testing on Vertebrates Section 4(h)2 Develop Strategic Plan SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 2

Overview of Draft Strategic Plan 1. Identification, Development and Integration of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs)* 2. Establishing Scientific Relevance, Reliability and Confidence 3. Importance of Training, Education and Collaboration 4. Implementation of NAMs Under TSCA Commitment of time and resources through the establishment of the TSCA NAM Team (TNT) * EPA views the term New Approach Methodologies as equivalent to alternative test methods and strategies SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 3

SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 4

Use of NAMs for TSCA Decision Context New chemicals program has been using NAMs for years ECOSAR, OncoLogic, EPISuite, New Chemical Categories Document, SAR/QSAR/Read-Across EPA will consider NAMs for: Screening candidates for prioritization Prioritization Risk evaluation Use will be fit-for-purpose SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 5

Identification, Development and Integration of NAMs (1) Identification and Development of NAMs Chemical Characterization Important to determine critical aspects of hazard, dosimetry, exposure and environmental fate/persistence Examples of NAMs currently used - EpiSuite, OECD QSAR Toolbox Hazard Identification and Characterization in chemico, in silico, in vitro, others Examples of NAMs currently used ECOSAR, OncoLogic, AIM (all new chemicals); ToxCast and Tox21 for screening for prioritization SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 6

Identification, Development and Integration of NAMs (2) Identification and Development of NAMs Dosimetry and In Vitro-In vivo Extrapolation (IVIVE) Developing and using tools to perform IVIVE Limited examples of NAMs currently used Characterizing Exposure to Humans and the Environment Examples of NAMs currently used ChemSTEER (environmental release and occupational exposure), CEM (consumer exposure), E- FAST (exposure to general population and environmental organisms) SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 7

Identification, Development and Integration of NAMs (3) Integration of NAMs: Frameworks and Weight of Evidence Section 26(h) and (i) use of Weight of Evidence (WoE) and Best Available Science Section 4(h) information of equivalent or better scientific quality (than traditional animal models) Various frameworks for Integrating or combining NAMs: Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA) Defined Approach (DA) Other considerations based on a tiered approach (examples endocrine program approach) SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 8

Establishing Scientific Relevance, Reliability and Confidence of NAMs (1) Framework (OECD Guidance Document 34): Relevance regulatory need/usefulness and associated limitations Reliability - reproducibility Transparency (i.e., release of data sets and performance characteristics) SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 9

Establishing Scientific Relevance, Reliability and Confidence of NAMs (2) Criteria (largely based on Casati et al., 2017) Decision context defined Where possible, NAM should be mechanistically and biologically relevant Criteria for selecting reference or training chemicals Reliability be considered in context of its use and accepted best practices NAM transparently described and all information is publicly available Uncertainty described to fullest extent possible Evaluation and implementation by third parties must be possible NAM should under go independent scientific review SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 10

Education, Training and Collaboration NAMs and the new advancements in science (biology, chemistry, non-vertebrate animal test methods) need to be understood for proper application under TSCA Ensuring that EPA scientists, the regulated community, and interested stakeholders are properly training to understand and use NAMs is critical to the success of implementing Section 4(h) of TSCA (including public outreach) EPA will continue to collaborates with multiple domestic and international partners on the development and use of NAMs for regulatory purposes. SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 11

Implementation Current-near term activities and needs (next three years) Intermediate term objectives (3-5 years) Long term goal SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 12

Implementation: Near-Term (Next Three Years) Building a TSCA NAM Foundation i. Continue to Implement NAMs to Evaluate Hazard, Exposure and Environmental Fate for New and Existing Chemicals ii. Review Existing NAMs and Create and Maintain a List as required. 1. Publish list June 2018 2. Review other existing NAMs according to Chapter 5 criteria iii. Identify and Maintain Most Requested/Needed Studies for New and Existing Chemicals Retrospective Analysis iv. Identify and Curate Available Existing TSCA Information on NAMs (and Traditional Test Data) CBI; TSCA In-House Inventory Analysis SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 13

Implementation: Near-Term (Next Three Years) (cont.) v. Use of NAMs to identify candidates for prioritizing existing chemicals vi. Begin development of Scientific Information Technology (IT) Platform vii. Collaborate with partners and stakeholders to identify NAMs for further development (including case studies through TNT) SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 14

Implementation: Intermediate-Term Objectives (3-5 years) i. Progress towards use of NAMs for prioritization and risk evaluation (several possibilities identified: toxicological threshold of concern (TTC); encouraging voluntary submitters to use NAMs; possible use of NAMs in designing safer chemicals. ii. Maintaining the expansion of the TSCA NAM List iii. Developing and maintaining educational and outreach goals for regulatory scientists, end-users and the public iv. Continue collaboration with partners and stakeholders to identify NAMs for further development SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 15

Implementation: Long-Term EPA s long-term goal is to move towards making TSCA decisions (conducting prioritization and risk evaluations for new and existing chemicals) with NAMs in order to reduce and eventually eliminate vertebrate animal testing for TSCA. SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 16

Next Steps Draft Strategic Plan released on March 7 including response to public comments from November 2 nd, 2017 meeting Public Meeting occurred on Tuesday, April 10 th in Washington, DC Comments on the Plan will be accepted through April 26 th (45-day comment period) Final will be published by June 22, 2018 SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 17

Acknowledgements: The Writing Team Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Anna Lowit Office of Science Coordination and Policy (OSCP) Kristan Markey, Seema Schappelle, Stan Barone Office of Research and Development (ORD) National Center for Computational Toxicology (NCCT) Rusty Thomas, John Cowden, Maureen Gwinn National Exposure Research Laboratory (NERL) Barbara Wetmore Immediate Office (IO) Jeff Frithsen Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) Hans Scheifele, Christina Motilall, Susanna Blair SCHC Orlando, FL April 25, 2018 18