CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

Similar documents
CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

N Engl J Med 2018;378: DOI: /NEJMoa Lin, Wan-Ting 2018/06/27

Disclosures (2013 to the present)

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

STATINS EVALUATION IN CORONARY PROCEDURES AND REVASCULARIZATION

J. Michael Gaziano, M.D., M.P.H. European Society of Cardiology August 26 th 2018

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-518, NCT#

Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat or Allopurinol in Patients with Gout

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

CPORT E Trial. Atlantic C PORT

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-516, NCT#

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

Lesinurad in Combination With a Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitor for Treatment of Hyperuricemia Associated With Gout

Is the combination of antithrombotics and lowdose anticoagulants worthwhile in PAD The VOYAGER trial

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

No Increased Cardiovascular Risk for Lixisenatide in ELIXA

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

1. How does the response to therapy compare in elderly versus middle age adults with diabetes in a randomized trial?

Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

Regulatory Experience in Reviewing CV Safety for Diabetes

How to approach non-infarct related artery disease in patients with STEMI in a limited resource setting

OVERVIEW OF ADVERSE CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN THE BRODALUMAB PSORIASIS STUDIES

Update on Diabetes Cardiovascular Outcome Trials

Clinical and Economic Value of Rivaroxaban in Coronary Artery Disease

Study 2 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Study Top-Line Results. October 29, 2018

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

LEADER Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes

The Changing Landscape of Managing Patients with PAD- Update on the Evidence and Practice of Care in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

Διάρκεια διπλής αντιαιμοπεταλιακής αγωγής. Νικόλαος Γ.Πατσουράκος Καρδιολόγος, Επιμελητής Α ΕΣΥ Τζάνειο Γενικό Νοσοκομείο Πειραιά

New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

New Drug Evaluation: lesinurad tablet, oral

Cardiovascular Outcomes With Newer Diabetes Drugs: Results From The EMPA-REG and LEADER Trials

Effect of SGLT-2 Inhibitors on the Heart. Robert Zimmerman MD Vice Chairman Endocrinology Director Diabetes Center Cleveland Clinic

Hypertension Update Warwick Jaffe Interventional Cardiologist Ascot Hospital

Reflection paper on assessment of cardiovascular safety profile of medicinal products

ACS: What happens after the acute phase? Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

ALLHAT. Major Outcomes in High Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic

CANVAS Program Independent commentary

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo

A: Epidemiology update. Evidence that LDL-C and CRP identify different high-risk groups

Regulatory Hurdles for Drug Approvals

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-525, NCT#

Chantix Label Update 2018

Belinda Green, Cardiologist, SDHB, 2016

Invokana (canagliflozin) NEW INDICATION REVIEW

Cindy L. Grines MD FACC FSCAI

Using DOACs in CAD Patients in Sinus Ryhthm Results of the ATLAS ACS 2, COMPASS and COMMANDER-HF Trials

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

Management of Type 2 Diabetes Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials Tom Blevins MD Texas Diabetes and Endocrinology Austin, Texas

Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation

Implications of Drug-related Increases in Blood Pressure

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

The ACCELERATE Trial

Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is overall survival, measured as the time in weeks from randomization to date of death due to any cause.

Anne Carol Goldberg, MD, FACP, FAHA, FNLA Washington University, St. Louis, MO USA

Reducing Inflammation to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk: The Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

Sponsor / Company: sanofi-aventis and Proctor & Gamble Drug substance(s): Risedronate (HMR4003)

Clopidogrel vs New Antiplatelet Therapy (Prasugrel) Adnan Kastrati, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität München, Germany

Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes

PRASUGREL HYDROCHLORIDE (Effient Eli Lilly Canada Inc.) Indication: Acute Coronary Syndrome

Sanjay Kaul, MD, FACC, FAHA Division of Cardiology Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, California

Estimands, Missing Data and Sensitivity Analysis: some overview remarks. Roderick Little

Effect on sudden death

LATE BREAKING STUDIES IN DM AND CAD. Will this change the guidelines?

Is Lower Better for LDL or is there a Sweet Spot

CORONARY: The Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery Off or On Pump Revascularization Study. Results at 1 Year

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT Sponsor/company: Sanofi-Aventis. Date: 08/02/ 2008

Non ST Elevation-ACS. Michael W. Cammarata, MD

European Society of Cardiology Congress 2018

Supplementary Online Content

Quality of Life Outcomes: The Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Nothing to disclose

Faculty/Presenter Disclosure

A factorial randomized trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

Satish K Surabhi, MD.FACC,FSCAI,RPVI Medical Director, Cardiac Cath Labs AnMed Health Heart & Vascular Care

Is there enough evidence for DAPT after endovascular intervention for PAOD?

TRIAL UPDATE 1. ISAR TRIPLE SECURITY Trial. Dr Deven Patel Royal Free Hospital

Reflection paper on assessment of cardiovascular risk of medicinal products for the treatment of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases Draft

Flaws, Bias, Misinterpretation and Fraud in Randomized Clinical Trials

Supplementary webappendix

Which drug do you prefer for stable CAD? - P2Y12 inhibitor

How to Handle Statin Intolerance in the High Risk Patient

Endocrinologist Sweetgrass Endocrinology

TICAGRELOR VERSUS CLOPIDOGREL AFTER THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ST- ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Disclosures for Presenter

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

The Cardiac Arrythmia Suppression Trial

Συμπεράσματα από τις νέες μελέτες για την αρτηριακή υπέρταση (SPRINT,PATHAY 2,HOPE 3)

Update on Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

An update on the management of UA / NSTEMI. Michael H. Crawford, MD

Cardiovascular Benefits of Two Classes of Antihyperglycemic Medications

(ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT ) Title: The Italian Elderly ACS Study Author: Stefano Savonitto. Date: 29 August 2011 Meeting: ESC congress, Paris

Characterization of Types and Sizes of Myocardial Infarction Reduced with Evolocumab in FOURIER

Transcription:

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial) William B. White, MD, for the CARES Investigators Calhoun Cardiology Center University of Connecticut School of Medicine Farmington, CT, USA

Objectives and Endpoints of CARES Primary objective: To demonstrate that major CV event rates with febuxostat are noninferior to allopurinol in patients with gout with CV disease Primary endpoint: Composite of first occurrence of CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, and urgent revascularization for unstable angina Secondary endpoints: Evaluation of time from randomization to the first occurrence of MACE: Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke Other secondary endpoints: individual rates of CV death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke Other endpoint: All-cause mortality CV, cardiovascular; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; MI, myocardial infarction.

Study Design Randomized, double-blind, multicenter controlled study of febuxostat versus allopurinol in patients with gout and cardiovascular disease in the USA, Canada, and Mexico Febuxostat once daily (40 80 mg) (N=3098) Treatment period (up to 6 years) Allopurinol once daily* (200 600 mg) (N=3092) Days 21 to 1 Day 1 Month 1 Month 12 End of study 2- to 4-week follow-up Screening visit Baseline/ randomization Visits at Months 0.5, 3, 6, and 12 Visits every 6 months *At randomization, patients were stratified according to renal function. After randomization, dose titration of allopurinol was made on the basis of renal function. Febuxostat did not require dose adjustment by renal function. White WB, et al. Am Heart J 2012;164:14 20.

Disposition of Patients 6190 patients randomized and received 1 dose of study drug (modified ITT population) Febuxostat N=3098 Allopurinol N=3092 1397 (45.0%) Discontinued study visits early 1391 (44.9%) Discontinued study visits early 191 (6.2%) adverse events (includes death) 595 (19.2%) unwillingness to continue 52 (1.7%) major protocol deviation 226 (7.3%) lost to follow-up 333 (10.7%) other reason 172 (5.6%) adverse events (includes death) 587 (19.0%) unwillingness to continue 46 (1.5%) major protocol deviation 223 (7.2%) lost to follow-up 363 (11.7%) other reason ITT, intention-to-treat.

Time to Primary Endpoint (CV Death, Nonfatal MI, Nonfatal Stroke, Urgent Revascularization for UA) Modified ITT population; hazard ratio 1.03 (*one-sided repeated CI bound, 1.23) Cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint (%) 25 20 15 10 5 Events, n (%) Allopurinol: 321 (10.4) Febuxostat: 335 (10.8) Febuxostat: Allopurinol: 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 Number of Time (month) subjects at risk Febuxostat (n): 3092 2764 2465 2080 1815 1560 1361 1132 933 767 589 437 258 Allopurinol (n): 3098 2784 2493 2111 1854 1589 1369 1165 955 778 573 441 264 *Using alpha=0.015. CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; ITT, intention-to-treat; MI, myocardial infarction; UA, unstable angina.

Secondary Endpoints Number (%) Febuxostat (N=3098) Allopurinol (N=3092) Hazard ratio for febuxostat group (95% CI) Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke 296 (9.6) 271 (8.8) 1.09 (0.92, 1.28) CV death 134 (4.3) 100 (3.2) Nonfatal MI 111 (3.6) 118 (3.8) Nonfatal stroke 71 (2.3) 70 (2.3) Urgent revascularization due to unstable angina *P=0.034. CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction. 49 (1.6) 56 (1.8) 1.34 (1.03, 1.73)* 0.93 (0.72, 1.21) 1.01 (0.73, 1.41) 0.86 (0.59, 1.26)

Mortality Endpoints Cumulative incidence of cardiovascular Cumulative incidence mortality (%) (%) 25 20 15 10 5 Cardiovascular Mortality Modified ITT; hazard ratio 1.34 (95% CI 1.03, 1.73) Events, n (%) Febuxostat, 134 (4.3) Allopurinol, 100 (3.2) Febuxostat: Allopurinol: Events of adjudicated sudden cardiac death Febuxostat, 83 (2.7%) Allopurinol, 56 (1.8%) Cumulative Incidence of all-cause mortality (%) 25 20 15 10 5 Events, n (%) Febuxostat, 243 (7.8) Allopurinol, 199 (6.4) All-Cause Mortality Modified ITT; hazard ratio 1.22 (95% CI 1.01, 1.47) Febuxostat: Allopurinol: 0 Number of 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 subjects at risk Time (months) Febuxostat (n): 3098 2823 2550 2174 1922 1659 1440 1243 1033 838 627 482 288 Allopurinol (n): 3092 2807 2530 2152 1898 1637 1433 1204 1008 838 646 489 287 CI, confidence interval; ITT, intent-to-treat. 0 Number of 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 subjects at risk Time (months) Febuxostat (n): 3098 2828 2552 2179 1928 1666 1447 1251 1038 840 631 487 289 Allopurinol (n): 3092 2812 2540 2161 1906 1648 1444 1215 1015 842 650 489 288

On-Treatment Analysis* Number (%) Febuxostat (N=3098) Allopurinol (N=3092) Primary endpoint 242 (7.8) 238 (7.7) CV death 62 (2.0) 41 (1.3) Nonfatal MI 93 (3.0) 106 (3.4) Nonfatal stroke 59 (1.9) 62 (2.0) Urgent revascularization due to unstable angina 45 (1.5) 44 (1.4) Death from any cause 92 (3.0) 72 (2.3) Hazard ratio for febuxostat group (95% CI) 1.00 (0.82, 1.22)** 1.49 (1.01, 2.22) 0.87 (0.66, 1.34) 0.94 (0.66, 1.34) 1.00 (0.66, 1.52) 1.26 (0.93, 1.72) *Prespecified: On drug and up to 30 days off drug; **97.0% CI; P=0.047. CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction.

Summary Rates of major adverse CV events on febuxostat were noninferior to allopurinol in patients with gout and CV disease All-cause mortality was greater on febuxostat versus allopurinol due to an imbalance in CV deaths, particularly sudden cardiac death These observations occurred in the following context: Urate lowering on febuxostat was greater than allopurinol Similar gout flare rates between groups during the trial No differences between groups for serum potassium, lipids, glucose, creatinine, or blood pressure No preclinical signals for cardiac toxicity observed with febuxostat No differences in the rates of major nonfatal cardiovascular events CV, cardiovascular.

Summary (2) There was a high rate of study discontinuation (45%) Rates of withdrawal were similar in the febuxostat and allopurinol groups Sensitivity analysis (on treatment plus 30 days within discontinuation of study drug) showed: Similar rates of the primary endpoint on febuxostat and allopurinol, comparable with the modified ITT analysis Higher rates of all-cause and CV death on febuxostat versus allopurinol were also comparable with the modified ITT analysis The majority of deaths occurred off drug Further safety analyses from the trial are ongoing to evaluate the unexpected mortality findings in CARES CV, cardiovascular; ITT, intent-to-treat.