OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Similar documents
OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

EUROPEAN BOARD OF ORTHODONTISTS APPENDIX 1 CASE PRESENTATION 2005

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

Case Report n 2. Patient. Age: ANB 8 OJ 4.5 OB 5.5

Case Report. profile relaxed relaxed smiling. How would you treat this malocclusion?

Angle Class I malocclusion with anterior open bite treated with extraction of permanent teeth

KJLO. A Sequential Approach for an Asymmetric Extraction Case in. Lingual Orthodontics. Case Report INTRODUCTION DIAGNOSIS

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

An Innovative Treatment Approach with Atypical Orthodontic Extraction Pattern in Bimaxillary Protrusion Case

SURGICAL - ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF CLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION IN AN ADULT PATIENT: A CASE REPORT

Conservative treatment of Angle Class III malocclusion with anterior crossbite

Early Mixed Dentition Period

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

Maxillary Expansion and Protraction in Correction of Midface Retrusion in a Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

Angle Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary dental protrusion and missing mandibular first molars*

TWO PHASE FOR A BETTER FACE!! TWIN BLOCK AND HEADGEAR FOLLOWED BY FIXED THERAPY FOR CLASS II CORRECTION

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment of Gummy Smile with Vertical Maxillary Excess

Transverse malocclusion, posterior crossbite and severe discrepancy*

Lingual correction of a complex Class III malocclusion: Esthetic treatment without sacrificing quality results.

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC BOARD

The practice of orthodontics is faced with new

Regarding morphological differences of the maxillary anterior teeth of monozygotic twin sisters

Treatment of Angle Class III. Department of Paedodontics and Orthodontics Dr. habil. Melinda Madléna associate professor

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

Treatment of a severe class II division 1 malocclusion with twin-block appliance

Correction of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion by Fixed Functional Class II Corrector Appliance: Case Report

Combined Orthodontic And Surgical Correction Of An Adolescent Patient With Thin Palatal Cortex And Vertical Maxillary Excess

Different Non Surgical Treatment Modalities for Class III Malocclusion

RMO VISUAL NORMS. CASE: CHINESE SAMPLE Dr. TRAINING F (CH) Chinese AGE: 12.4 X: 09/30/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH

SKELETAL ANCHORAGE IN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF A CLASS II MALOCCLUSION

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

CASE: EXTRACTION Dr. TRAINING M (CA) Caucasian AGE: 8.6 VISUAL NORMS RMO X: 02/06/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2003

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Skeletal and dental Class II malocclusion, with anterior open bite and accentuated overjet*

Orthodontic and Orthognathic Surgical Correction of a Skeletal Class III Malocclusion

ISW for the treatment of adult anterior crossbite with severe crowding combined facial asymmetry case

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

Class II correction with Invisalign - Combo treatments. Carriere Distalizer.

MBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D

Case Report Diagnosis and Treatment of Pseudo-Class III Malocclusion

Nonextraction Treatment of Upper Canine Premolar Transposition in an Adult Patient

Case Report Orthodontic Treatment of a Mandibular Incisor Extraction Case with Invisalign

2008 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. Correction of Asymmetry with a Mandibular Propulsion Appliance

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

An orthognathic case of skeletal mandibular prognathism with multiple tooth loss

Dr Robert Drummond. BChD, DipOdont Ortho, MChD(Ortho), FDC(SA) Ortho. Canad Inn Polo Park Winnipeg 2015

Treatment of Class II non-extraction using the Bioprogressive method

CASE: HISPANIC SAMPLE Dr. TRAINING F (LA) Latin AGE: 10.5 VISUAL NORMS RMO X: 06/23/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2003

Maxillary canine first premolar bilateral transposition in a Class III patient: A case report

Hypodontia is the developmental absence of at

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

Skeletal class III maloeclusion treated using a non-surgieal approach supplemented with mini-implants: a case report

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

Treatment of a Patient with Class I Malocclusion and Severe Tooth Crowding Using Invisalign and Fixed Appliances

ISW for the treatment of moderate crowding dentition with unilateral second molar impaction

Case Report Orthodontic Replacement of Lost Permanent Molar with Neighbor Molar: A Six-Year Follow-Up

ALEXANDER DISCIPLINE

The Tip-Edge appliance and

Nonextraction Management of Class II Malocclusion Using Powerscope: A Case Report

Volume 22 No. 14 September Dentists, Federally Qualified Health Centers and Health Maintenance Organizations For Action

instruction. The principal investigator traced and measured all cephalograms over an illuminated view box using the standard technique described Tweed

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

Orthodontic mini-implants have revolutionized

Correction of Class II Malocclusions in Growing Patients by Using the Invisalign Technique: Rational Bases and Treatment Staging

Concepts of occlusion Balanced occlusion. Monoplane occlusion. Lingualized occlusion. Figure (10-1)

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

Orthodontics-surgical combination therapy for Class III skeletal malocclusion

Case Report: Early Correction of Class III Malocclusion with alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion And Constriction (Alt-RAMEC) and Face Mask Therapy

Sliding Mechanics with Microscrew Implant Anchorage

S.H. Age: 15 Years 3 Months Diagnosis: Class I Nonextraction Severe crowding, very flat profile. Background:

Effect of Chronic Nasal Airway Obstruction on Maxillary Arch Form in Monozygotic Twins: A Case Report

Cephalometric Comparison of Treatment with Twin Block Appliance in Skeletal Class II Div 1 Patients with Normal and Vertical Growth Pattern

Face Adaptation in Orthodontics

The treatment options for nongrowing skeletal Class

Class III malocclusions are complex to MANDIBULAR CERVICAL HEADGEAR IN ORTHOPEDIC AND ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF CLASS III CASES

mandibular deficiency and maxillary and mandibular crowding: follow-up evaluation

Introduction. Facial findings. Intraoral findings. Frontal and lateral cephalometric photographs

#45 Ortho-Tain, Inc PREVENTIVE ERUPTION GUIDANCE -- PREVENTIVE OCCLUSAL DEVELOPMENT

Comprehensive Orthodontic Diagnosis Align upper and lower arches is not a treatment plan!

Ortho-surgical Management of Severe Vertical Dysplasia: A Case Report

ACTIVATOR: SIMPLE YET EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCE FOR SKELETAL CLASS II CORRECTION: CASE REPORT... ABSTRACT:...

Clinical efficacy of Invisalign treatment with weekly aligner changes: Two case reports

Transcription:

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS CANDIDATE NUMBER: KDr. KP. kanarelis CASE NUMBER: 2 Year: 2010 WBLO 01

RESUME OF CASE 2 CASE CATEGORY: ADULT MALOCCLUSION NAME : MARIA A. BORN: 18.04.1983 SEX: F PRETREATMENT RECORDS: AGE:23 DATE:20.11.2006 CLASSIFICATION: Adult malocclusion - Class II1 TEETH MISSING BEFORE TREATMENT: 0 TREATMENT PLAN: APPLIANCE: Upper & lower lingual fixed orthodontic appliance TREATMENT STARTED: AGE: 23 DATE: 07-01-2007 TREATMENT ENDED: AGE: 25 DATE: 15-12-2008 ACTIVE TREATMENT TIME: 23 months POSTTREATMENT RECORDS: AGE: 25 DATE: 15-12-2008 RETAINERS: a)upper: a)lower: DATE: 15-12-2008 RETENTION ENDED: a)upper: not ended a)lower: not ended DATE: not ended RETENTION TIME: unlimited (POST-) RETENTION RECORDS: AGE: DATE: TIME OUT OF RETENTION: still in retention WBLO 02

DIAGNOSTIC DESCRIPTION OF THE MALOCCLUSION A. SUMMARY Patient s chief complaint is smile dysharmony. She is motivated to get a perfect smile B. EXAMINATION OF HEAD AND FACE Patient s face is symetric and in harmony C. FUNCTIONAL EXAMINATION Patient s mastication shows no particular problem to mention D. INTRAORAL EXAMINATION INTRAORAL: 1. Classe II molar and canine: 2. Overjet 7.5 mm and overbite 4,5 mm 3. Crowding on the upper and lower arch, 4. No Crossbite 5. Mesial in rotation of the upper molar with protrusion of the mandibular incisors E. DENTAL CASTS Mandibular arch: crowding of the incisors Maxillary arch: malposition 13; 23; Occlusion Sagittal: 7.5mm Class II1 Occlusion Vertical: 4,5mm Occlusion Transversal: ok CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 20.11.2006 AGE: 23 WBLO 03

FRONTAL SMILING PROFILE FACIAL PHOTOGRAPHS BEFORE TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 20.11.2006 AGE: 23 WBLO 04

Right Buccal Left Buccal Center Upper Occlusal Lower Occlusal INTRA-ORAL COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS START OF THE TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 07.01.2007 AGE: 24 WBLO 05

WBLO6

LATERAL SKULL RADIOGRAPH BEFORE TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 20.11.2006 AGE: 23 WBLO 07

TRACING OF LATERAL SKULL RADIOGRAPH BEFORE TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 20.11.2006 AGE: 23 WBLO 07-1

WBLO07-02

CEPHALOMETRIE ANALYSE TWEED MERRYFIELD Start Tt SNA 82 ± 2 83.4 SNB 80 ± 2 76.6 ANB 2 ± 2 6.8 FMA IMPA OP/F 25 ± 3 87 ± 3 10 26.1 104.3 2.6 CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 20.11.2006 AGE: 23 WBLO 08-1

CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 1 Sagittal Skeletal Relations Maxillary Position S-N-A Mandibular Position S-N-B Sagittal Jaw Relation A-N-B Vertical Skeletal Relations Maxillary Inclination S-N / ANS-PNS Mandibular Inclination S-N / Go-Gn Pretreatment Mean SD 83.4 82º ± 3.5º 76.6 80º ± 3.5º 6.8 2º ± 2.5º 8.8 8º ± 3.0º 33.7 33º ± 2.5º Vertical Jaw Relation ANS-PNS / Go-Gn 26.1 25º ± 6.0º Dento-Basal Relations Maxillary Incisor Inclination 1 - ANS-PNS Mandibular Incisor Inclination 1 - Go-Gn Mandibular Incisor Compensation 1 - A-Pg (mm) Dental Relations Overjet (mm) 113.5 110º ± 6.0º 104.3 94º ± 7.0º 2.5mm 7.5mm 2± 2.0 3.5± 2.5 Overbite (mm) 4.5mm 2± 2.5 Interincisal Angle 1 / 1 119 132º ± 6.0º CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 20.11.2006 AGE: 23 WBLO 08-2

PERIAPICAL OR PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS BEFORE TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 20.11.2006 AGE: 23 WBLO 09

RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS BEFORE TREATMENT A. INTRAORAL / PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPH PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPH: periodontic desease grade 1. B. INTERPRETATION OF CEPHALOMETRIC ASSESSMENT 1. Sagittal Skeletal Relations: Sagittal Jjaw Relation ANB 6.8 2. 3. 4. Skeletal Classe II malocclusion; Vertical Skeletal Relations: vertical face height beyond the range of normal, lower anterior face height normal; Dento- Basal Relations: Maxillary incisor in an acceptable position; mandibular incisor in a protusive position; Dental relations: excessive buccal position of the lower incisor s, Classe II molar and canine; 5. Esthetic Profil: Hight convexity. CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 20.11.2006 AGE: 23 WBLO 10

Right Buccal Left Buccal Center Upper Occlusal Lower Occlusal TREATMENT STEPS INTRA-ORAL OCCLUSAL VIEW COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 07.01.2007 AGE:24 WBLO11

8 partial retraction of the upper canines WBLO11-1

Right Buccal Left Buccal Center Upper Occlusal Lower Occlusal TREATMENT STEPS INTRA-ORAL OCCLUSAL VIEW COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 08.10.2007 AGE: 24 WBLO11-2

Right Buccal Left Buccal Center Upper Occlusal Lower Occlusal TREATMENT STEPS INTRA-ORAL OCCLUSAL VIEW COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 03.10.2008 AGE: 25 WBLO11-3

Right Buccal Left Buccal Center Upper Occlusal Lower Occlusal TREATMENT STEPS INTRA-ORAL OCCLUSAL VIEW COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 15.12.2008 AGE: 25 WBLO11-4

WBLO11-5

WBLO11-6

RESUME OF THE TREATMENT CARRIED OUT INCLUDING ANY DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED TREATMENT GOUVERNANCE 1) Banding both arches with lingual appliances 2) Extraction 14; 24 + stripping lower arch 3) 2 «facettes»leveling both arches 4) Partial retraction of the upper cuspids and en mass retraction of upper cuspids and incisors (bowing effect occured & repairs) 5) Class II elastics 6) Detailing 7) Retaining 8) Due the short lingual surfaces of the lower bicuspids we have bonded the anteriors with InOvation-L and the premolars with STb. CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 15.12.2008 AGE: 25 WBLO12

LATERAL SKULL RADIOGRAPH AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 15.12.2008 AGE: 25 WBLO13

TRACING OF LATERAL SKULL RADIOGRAPH AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 15.12.2008 AGE: 25 WBLO13-1

WBLO13-2

WBLO13-3

CEPHALOMETRIE ANALYSE TWEED MERRYFIELD Start Tt End Tt SNA 82 ± 2 83.4 83 SNB 80 ± 2 76.6 75.4 ANB 2 ± 2 6.8 7.6 FMA IMPA OP/F 25 ± 3 87 ± 3 10 26.1 27.8 104.3 109.3 2.6 1.8 CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 15-12-2008 AGE: 25 WBLO14-1

CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 2 Sagittal Skeletal Relations Maxillary Position S-N-A Mandibular Position S-N-B Sagittal Jaw Relation A-N-B Vertical Skeletal Relations Maxillary Inclination S-N / ANS-PNS Mandibular Inclination S-N / Go-Gn Pretreatment Posttreatment Mean SD 83.4 83 82º ± 3.5º 76.6 75.4 80º ± 3.5º 6.8 7.6 2º ± 2.5º 8.8 7.6 8º ± 3.0º 33.7 35.3 33º ± 2.5º Vertical Jaw Relation ANS-PNS / Go-Gn 26.1 24.9 25º ± 6.0º Dento-Basal Relations Maxillary Incisor Inclination 1 - ANS-PNS Mandibular Incisor Inclination 1 - Go-Gn Mandibular Incisor Compensation 1 - A-Pg (mm) Dental Relations Overjet (mm) 113.5 99.9 110º ± 6.0º 104.3 109.3 94º ± 7.0º 2.5mm 7.5mm 4.2mm 2mm 2± 2.0 3.5± 2.5 Overbite (mm) 4.5mm 2mm 2± 2.5 Interincisal Angle 1 / 1 119 124.7 132º ± 6.0º CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 15.12.2008 AGE: 25 WBLO14-2

PERIAPICAL OR PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 15.12.2008 AGE: 25 WBLO15

RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT A. INTRAORAL / PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPH - Roots on the upper and lower arches are parallele - T ipping of the lower incisors B. INTERPRETATION OF CEPHALOMETRIC ASSESSMENT 1. Sagittal Skeletal Relations: maxillary position beyond the range of normal; mandible retruded relative to the maxilla; increased ANB 2. Vertical Skeletal Relations: normal vertical face height beyond the range of 3. Dento- Basal Relations: Maxillary incisor well positionned relative to line SN/ANS-PNS; mandibular incisor well positionned relative to line Go-Gn 4. Dental relations: normal overjet and overbite CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 15.12.2008 AGE: 25 WBLO16

DESCRIPTION OF THE TREATMENT RESULT TREATMENT RESULT ORIENTATION 1) Patient s profile is nice and harmonious 2) Class I cuspid relationship 3) Class II molar relationship, because of upper 1st bicuspid extractions 4) Retaining goal: lifelong CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 15.12.2008 AGE: 25 WBLO17

WBLO18

WBLO19

WBLO20

DESCRIPTION OF THE POST-TREATMENT EVALUATION OF RETENTION RETENTION RESULT ORIENTATION 1) Retaining goal: lifelong 2) Occlusion is stable 3) Teeth positions are stable CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 06.2010 AGE: 27 WBLO21