Updated cost utility analysis for statins

Similar documents
Issue date: January Review date: November Statins for the prevention of cardiovascular events. Technology Appraisal 94

Technology Assessment Report No. 2

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

rosuvastatin, 5mg, 10mg, 20mg, film-coated tablets (Crestor ) SMC No. (725/11) AstraZeneca UK Ltd.

APPENDIX B: LIST OF THE SELECTED SECONDARY STUDIES

Cost-effectiveness of pravastatin for primary prevention of coronary artery disease in Japan Nagata-Kobayashi S, Shimbo T, Matsui K, Fukui T

Type of intervention Primary prevention; secondary prevention. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis and cost utility analysis.

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Cost effectiveness of statin therapy for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease in Ireland Nash A, Barry M, Walshe V

Appendix E Health Economic modelling

Andrew Cohen, MD and Neil S. Skolnik, MD INTRODUCTION

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Setting Community. The economic study was carried out in Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Lifetime clinical and economic benefits of statin-based LDL lowering in the 20-year Followup of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study

Is medical treatment for angina the most cost-effective option? Cleland J G, Walker A

Need and projected demand for lipid-modifying agents in New Zealand

Statins in the elderly: What evidence of their benefit in prevention?

Primary care. Coronary heart disease prevention: insights from modelling incremental cost effectiveness. Abstract. Methods. Introduction.

Statins in the elderly : Is there a rationale?

Medical evidence suggests that

Appendix E Health Economic modelling

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the

Is Lower Better for LDL or is there a Sweet Spot

Saving Lives, Saving Families: The health, social and economic advantages of detecting and treating familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH)

PHARMAC responds on long-acting insulin analogues

Dyslipidemia in the light of Current Guidelines - Do we change our Practice?

HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN THE OLDER POPULATION NICOLE SLATER, PHARMD, BCACP AUBURN UNIVERSITY, HARRISON SCHOOL OF PHARMACY JULY 16, 2016

How would you manage Ms. Gold

Calculating RR, ARR, NNT

STATINS FOR PAD Long - term prognosis

Setting The setting was primary care. The economic study was carried out in the UK.

Novel PCSK9 Outcomes. in Perspective: Lessons from FOURIER & ODYSSEY LDL-C. ASCVD Risk. Suboptimal Statin Therapy

National Medicines Information Centre

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular outcomes?

4/7/ The stats on heart disease. + Deaths & Age-Adjusted Death Rates for

Cost of lipid lowering in patients with coronary artery disease by Case Method Learning Kiessling A, Zethraeus N, Henriksson P

Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease- The Challenge in patients with diabetes

What s new in cardiovascular disease risk assessment and management for primary care clinicians

Metformin should be considered in all patients with type 2 diabetes unless contra-indicated

Coronary heart disease prevention and age inequalities:

The New England Journal of Medicine COST EFFECTIVENESS OF SIMVASTATIN TREATMENT TO LOWER CHOLESTEROL LEVELS IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE

Statins in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

Complications of Diabetes: Screening and Prevention

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

Data Alert. Vascular Biology Working Group. Blunting the atherosclerotic process in patients with coronary artery disease.

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Complications of Diabetes: Screening and Prevention. Dr Martin McIntyre Consultant Physician Royal Alexandra Hospital Paisley

Supplementary Online Content

Should we base treatment decisions on short-term or lifetime CVD risk? Rod Jackson University of Auckland New Zealand

Threshold Level or Not for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Health technology Abciximab use in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

JAMA. 2011;305(24): Nora A. Kalagi, MSc

MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebocontrolled

Smoking and CVD. .what role for the Cardiologist? Dr Sandeep Gupta, MD, FRCP

03/30/2016 DISCLOSURES TO OPERATE OR NOT THAT IS THE QUESTION CAROTID INTERVENTION IS INDICATED FOR ASYMPTOMATIC CAROTID OCCLUSIVE DISEASE

Update on Cholesterol Management: The 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines

Is medical treatment for angina the most cost-effective option?

Supplementary appendix

The All Wales Medicine Strategy Group (AWMSG) is asked to support implementation of the following prescribing indicators.

Joshua A. Beckman, MD. Brigham and Women s Hospital

New ACC/AHA Guidelines on Lipids: Are PCSK9 Inhibitors Poised for a Breakthrough?

The cost-effectiveness of lipid lowering in patients with diabetes: results from the 4S trial

The role of statins in patients with arterial hypertension

CHOLESTEROL-LOWERING THERAPHY

Introduction. Objective. Critical Questions Addressed

AIM HIGH for SATURN and stay SHARP; COURAGE (v1.5)

The treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD) The Health Economics of the Treatment of Hyperlipidemia and Hypertension J. McMurray

Lecture 8 Cardiovascular Health Lecture 8 1. Introduction 2. Cardiovascular Health 3. Stroke 4. Contributing Factors

The updated guidelines from the National

Coronary artery disease remains the leading

HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE. How can we do better?

well-targeted primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: an underused high-value intervention?

Since the release of the National Cholesterol PROCEEDINGS FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN DYSLIPIDEMIA MANAGEMENT * Michael B. Clearfield, DO, FACOI ABSTRACT

Protecting the heart and kidney: implications from the SHARP trial

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE. Overview

Antiplatelet Therapy in Primary CVD Prevention and Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Καρακώστας Γεώργιος Διευθυντής Καρδιολογικής Κλινικής, Γ.Ν.

Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes

CVD Risk Assessment. Lipid Management in Women: Lessons Learned. Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Supplementary Online Content

Balloon angioplasty versus bypass grafting in the era of coronary stenting Ekstein S, Elami A, Merin G, Gotsman M S, Lotan C

LLL Session - Nutrition support in diabetes and dyslipidemia. Dyslipidemia: targeting the management of cardiovascular risk factors. M.

2013 Cholesterol Guidelines. Anna Broz MSN, RN, CNP, AACC Adult Certified Nurse Practitioner North Ohio Heart, Inc.

Clinical impact and health economic consequences of post-transplant type 2 diabetes mellitus Chilcott J B, Whitby S M, Moore R

Comparison of Original and Generic Atorvastatin for the Treatment of Moderate Dyslipidemic Patients

Preventive Cardiology Scientific evidence

All medications are a double-edged sword with risks

MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in high-risk individuals: a randomised placebocontrolled

ESC Geoffrey Rose Lecture on Population Sciences Cholesterol and risk: past, present and future

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

Cholesterol lowering intervention for cardiovascular prevention in high risk patients with or without LDL cholesterol elevation

LOW DOSE ASPIRIN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE FOR PROPHYLAXIS OF FOR BACKGROUND USE ONLY NOT TO BE USED IN DETAILING

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Control of Hypercholesterolaemia and Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy

Original Articles. Statin Cost-Effectiveness in the United States for People at Different Vascular Risk Levels

Management of Hypertension for Stroke Prevention in New Zealand: Can We Do Better? Walter van der Merwe Nephrologist Waitemata DHB

Cost-effectiveness of evolocumab (Repatha ) for hypercholesterolemia

Setting The setting was secondary care. The economic study appears to have been conducted in the UK.

Setting The setting was primary care. The economic study was carried out in the UK and the USA.

A cost-effectiveness model of alternative statins to achieve target LDL-cholesterol levels Maclaine G D, Patel H

Transcription:

Updated cost utility analysis for statins Scott Metcalfe Pharmac 30 January 2001 Pharmac estimates the cost-utility of providing statins to everyone with dyslipidaemia and > 10% 5-year absolute risk of cardiovascular events, at a proposed price of.45/day, is $1,630/QALY if statins are used over patients remaining lifetimes, or $1,445/QALY if statins are used for 5 years and then use is reassessed. In particular, those with established coronary heart disease (CHD) and total cholesterol > 5.5 mmol/l are estimated to have remaining lifetime and 5-year cost/qalys of $1,285/QALY and $1,155 respectively. Others with a >10% 5-year absolute cardiovascular risk and total cholesterol > 5.5 mmol/l have $2,110 and $1,860 cost/qalys for the same analyses. Only one group has cost/qalys greater than $5,000 - those with <10% 5-year absolute risk (giving less value with much higher cost/qalys at >$-15,000/QALY): Cost/QALYS for statins Rx, lifetime use at 10% discount rate discount rate: 10.0% population group group 5-year absolute CHD risk Undiscounted Discounted 5-year costs, QALYs per patient values potential no. undiscounted discounted Rx costs pts QALYs QALYs net other % offsets cost/qalys Vote:Health costs Average daily cost/patient (ADC).60.60.60.60.45 current price simvastatin future contracted price simv Average cost/patient/year (AYC) $219 $219 $219 $219 $164 >=7.5 61.6% 16,388 3.73 1.09 $1,362 -$397 29% $888 $575 6.5-7.4 43.9% 39,281 3.49 0.93 $1,450 -$447 31% $1,076 $688 5.5-6.4 31.7% 66,949 2.53 0.54 $1,501 -$383 25% $2,090 $1,389 <5.5 23.8% 54,690 1.34 0.26 $1,502 -$236 16% $4,950 $3,482 genetic LDs.3% 2,936 5. 0.66 $1,843 -$1,149 62% $1,047 $2 at risk >=20% 22.5% 25,369 1.92 0.54 $1,472 -$387 26% $2,010 $1,329 at risk 15-19% 17.5% 46,187 1.80 0.45 $1,562 -$362 23% $2,661 $1,795 at risk 10-14% 12.5% 107,860 1.64 0.36 $1,683 -$311 18% $3,815 $2,645 low risk <10% 3.6% 1,319,776 1.05 0.10 $2,034 -$168 8% $18,768 $,654 32.6% 177,308 2.49 0.59 $1,477 -$3 24% $1,9 $1,285 others >10% risk 10.3% 182,2 1.77 0.41 $1,626 -$348 21% $3,096 $2,111 total 21.3% 9,660 2. 0.50 $1,552 -$0 23% $2,409 $1,631 Note that the above estimates for using statins over patients remaining lifetimes are based on undiscounted QALY gains (for everyone with dyslipidaemia and >10% risk) of 2.1 extra qualityadjusted life years (falling to 0.5 years after discounting at 10%), and discounted savings elsewhere in the Health Sector offsetting statin costs by 23%.

Cost/QALYS for statins Rx, 5-year use at 10% discount rate discount rate: 10.0% population group group 5-year absolute CHD risk Undiscounted Discounted 5-year costs, QALYs per patient values potential no. undiscounted discounted Rx costs net other % offsets cost/qalys pts QALYs QALYs Vote:Health costs Average daily cost/patient (ADC).60.60.60.60.45 current price simvastatin future contracted price simv Average cost/patient/year (AYC) $219 $219 $219 $219 $164 >=7.5 61.6% 16,388 1.49 0.63 $758 -$243 32% $823 $520 6.5-7.4 43.9% 39,281 1.28 0.51 $770 -$263 34% $986 $612 5.5-6.4 31.7% 66,949 0.78 0.28 $773 -$228 29% $1,948 $1,257 <5.5 23.8% 54,690 0.39 0. $773 -$141 18% $4,746 $3,294 genetic LDs.3% 2,936 1.52 0.41 $800 -$467 58% $817 $326 at risk >=20% 22.5% 25,369 0.75 0.30 $771 -$223 29% $1,806 $1,171 at risk 15-19% 17.5% 46,187 0.63 0.24 $783 -$202 26% $2,405 $1,595 at risk 10-14% 12.5% 107,860 0.52 0.18 $797 -$166 21% $3,475 $2,378 low risk <10% 3.6% 1,319,776 0.14 0.04 $825 -$72 9% $21,129 $15,343 32.6% 177,308 0.83 0.32 $771 -$210 27% $1,760 $1,155 others >10% risk 10.3% 182,2 0.60 0.22 $790 -$188 24% $2,769 $1,861 total 21.3% 9,660 0.71 0.27 $781 -$199 25% $2,176 $1,446 Note that the above estimates for using statins over 5 years are based on undiscounted QALY gains for everyone with dyslipidaemia and >10% risk of 0.7 extra quality-adjusted life years (lower than occurs with lifetime statin use), falling to 0.27 years after discounting at 10%, and discounted savings elsewhere in the Health Sector offsetting statin costs by 25% (similar to offsets with lifetime statin use). Pharmac s analysis is based on clinical trial data on the effectiveness of statin treatment (i.e. treated versus untreated patients), applied to models of natural history of cardiovascular disease (deaths rates, rates of non-fatal events, and calculations of life expectancy), quality of life scores for each health state, and costs of treating with pharmaceuticals and to other parts of the health sector of treating or not treating with statins. The updated model involves a number of cohorts based on age, gender, 5-year absolute CHD risk, and total cholesterol levels. These groups relate to those defined in the updated guidelines published by New Zealand s National Heart Foundation (NHF) in 1996 1, i.e.: clinically proven ischaemic heart disease (NHF risk group A1:1) post coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or angioplasty (A1:2) post heart transplant proven ischaemic stroke or unequivocal history of transient ischaemic attack due to arteriosclerosis (A1:3) unequivocal history of intermittent claudication (A1:4) genetic lipid disorders (familial hypercholesterolaemia, familial defective Apo B, familial combined dyslipidaemia, combined dyslipidaemia (type III)) (A2) insulin and non-insulin dependent diabetes with established nephropathy (albumin excretion greater than 300 mg/day) total cholesterol (A3) > 20% 5-year cardiovascular disease risk (B) 15-20% 5-year cardiovascular disease risk (C) 1 NHF Guidelines for the assessment and management of dyslipidaemia. NZ Med J 1996;109:224-32. P1-5-0 #644 2

10-15% 5-year cardiovascular disease risk (D) < 10% 5-year cardiovascular disease risk (E) Pharmac has done similar analysis previously, and the methods and results have been described in some detail (see Pharmac documents #26723 and #26220 of June 1997, available on Pharmac s website at http://www.pharmac.govt.nz/download/statin97methods.pdf and http://www.pharmac.govt.nz/download/statin97results.pdf or freephone 0800 66 00 50). The current analysis differs from those of May 1997 and subsequently by the following features: Use of both 5-year and remaining lifetime timespans (previously had used 5-year horizon only). Inclusion of cerebrovascular (stroke) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) outcomes (previously only CHD deaths and non-fatal events). Stroke and PVD event rates (a) for each cohort are derived from 4S 2 placebo event rates (b), 4S placebo CHD events (b) and the cohort s baseline CHD event rate (d), where a = b d c. Patients with stroke are assigned a quality of life score of 0.72 (from NZBD 3 disability weight of 0.285, a caseweighted average including no sequelae of Netherlands BD weights 4 ). Updated absolute risk estimates for genetic lipid disorders (familial hyperlipidaemia etc) - see Pharmac document #31473 of November 1997, available on Pharmac s website at http://www.pharmac.govt.nz/download/statin97a2fh.pdf. Updated relative risk reductions, now constant across all categories of age, gender and baseline cardiovascular risk (La Rosa 1999 5, HTA meta-analysis 1999 6, preliminary results from the MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study (HPS) 7 ) at 42% for fatal (CHD death), 30% for non-fatal major CHD events, 37% for coronary surgery or angioplasty, 11% for non-mi acute CHD, 36% for both fatal and non-fatal stroke, and 27% for peripheral vascular disease events, from the 4S trial (had previously varied according to age, gender, and baseline cardiovascular risk). Note that stratification according to baseline total cholesterol levels still occurs for those with established CHD as previously, particularly affecting those with TC < 5.5 mmol/l (consistent with 4S 8, CARE 9 and LIPID 10 relative risk reduction patterns). 2 Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian simvastatin survival study (4S). Lancet 1994;344:83-9. 3 Tobias M. The Burden of Disease and Injury in New Zealand. Public Health Intelligence Occasional Bulletin No. 1. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2001. 4 Stouthard MEA, Essink-Bot M, Bonsel GJ, Barendregt PGN, et al. Disability weights for diseases in the Netherlands. Rotterdam: Department of Public Health, Erasmus University, 1997. 5 LaRosa JC, He J, Vupputuri S. Effect of statins on risk of coronary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1999;282:2340-6. 6 Ebrahim S, Smith GD, McCabe C, Payne N, Pickin M, Sheldon TA, Lampe F, Sampson F, Ward S, Wannamethee G. What role for statins? A review and economic model. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3:i-iv, 1-91. 7 http://www.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/projects/hps.shtml 8 Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Baseline serum cholesterol and treatment effect in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival study (4S). Lancet 1995;345:1274-5. 9 Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, Roubleau JL, Rutherford JD, et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med 1996;3:1001-9. 10 The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in ptients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med 1998;339:49-57. P1-5-0 #644 3

Use of 10-year age bands for cohorts aged -44 to 75-84 (previously 5-year age bands -30 to 80-84). Updated non-pharmaceutical Health Sector costs (HFA DRG prices 99/00), and updated clinical trial data (unpublished) on the effectiveness of statins at reducing such costs over time (previously had used attributable risk estimates to help derive costs offsets): Health sector costs/patient (differences between simvastatin and placebo groups costed on basis of NZ DRG costings) Myocardial Bypass drg Revascularis Angina drg Arrhythmias Cerebrovasc Cerebrovasc Revascula Others total Infarction drg 106,107 121-123 ation drg 112 124, 125, 140drg 8 ular drg 14 ular drg 15 risation drg1/ 2 MI CABG PTCA angina arrhythmias CVA TIA vascular proc other - not categorised by MSD unit cost $3,729 $12,093 $3,456 $1,614 $2,779 $14,581 $1,967 $5,939 $2,044 placebo Year 1 $238 $256 $12 $62 $16 $72 $3 $8 $19 $687 Year 2 $201 $4 $16 $57 $20 $85 $3 $ $25 $774 Year 3 $208 $397 $20 $73 $19 $125 $2 $3 $25 $871 Year 4 $164 $462 $22 $62 $18 $105 $9 $8 $29 $878 Year 5 $176 $305 $17 $52 $24 $98 $4 $8 $29 $712 Year 5.4 $69 $92 $17 $22 $8 $39 $5 $3 $17 $272 Total $1,057 $1,866 $104 $329 $104 $525 $25 $43 $143 $4,194 5 years $979 $1,728 $96 $305 $96 $486 $23 $40 $2 $3,884 simvastatin Year 1 $170 $245 $19 $74 $23 $66 $2 $11 $10 $618 Year 2 $128 $261 $14 $47 $19 $92 $4 $8 $15 $587 Year 3 $101 $267 $20 $42 $33 $85 $4 $5 $20 $577 Year 4 $101 $152 $19 $39 $33 $53 $4 $5 $23 $428 Year 5 $112 $169 $19 $36 $ $66 $4 $11 $16 $468 Year 5.4 $50 $76 $8 $15 $29 $33 $1 $8 $16 $2 Total $662 $1,171 $98 $254 $170 $394 $18 $48 $99 $2,9 5 years $6 $1,084 $91 $2 $158 $365 $16 $45 $92 $2,697 Use only of potential (ideal) cost/qalys based on intention-to-treat results from clinical trials (with relatively high patient continuation/adherence rates in a select population) (previously had used both potential and actual cost/qalys, where actual cost/qalys adjusted for likely continuation/adherence rates expected for all New Zealand users). 10% discount rate (PHARMAC s current rate for economic analyses) (previously 11.4%). Although total cholesterol levels rather than the more predictive total:hdl ratios are used to define the cohorts used in the model, differences are likely to be minor. For patients without established CHD (i.e. primary prevention - NHF risk groups A2 and B-E above), the model assumes dyslipidaemia i.e. total cholesterol > 5.5 mmol/l. The updated model has not formally included coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and angioplasty patients, heart transplant patients, patients with proven ischaemic stroke or unequivocal history of transient ischaemic attack due to arteriosclerosis, patients with unequivocal history of intermittent claudication, or diabetes with established nephropathy (NHF groups A1:2, A1:3, A1:4 and A3). Results for these groups however are expected to be at least as beneficial and cost-effective as occur for those with > 20% 5-year cardiovascular disease risk (NHF group B). The modelling creates a series of quality-adjusted survival curves, showing the effects of statins on quality-adjusted life expectancy of untreated patients at various levels of risk. QALY gains are seen by the gap between untreated and treated cohorts, e.g.: P1-5-0 #644 4

Statin quality-adjusted survival curves 100%, untreated 90% others, untreated, treated % surviving, adjusting for quality of life 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% QALYS, statins for (secondary prevention) QALYS, statins for non-chd pts (primary prevention) others, treated increase in quality-adjusted life expectancy (dqale), primary prevention 20% 10% increase in quality-adjusted life expectancy (dqale), secondary prevention 0% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 year Before discounting, QALY gains increase with cardiovascular risk but are also highest for younger age groups: extra years gained, quality-adjusted (QALY gains) 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 (Undiscounted) QALYs saved by statin use over remaining lifetime, by preventing cardiovascular events (both premature deaths and ongoing morbidity), >=7.5, 6.5-7.4, 5.5-6.4, <5.5 0.0 starting However, discounting blunts much of these age gradients, especially for those with established CHD (who have maximum QALY gains for men aged 55-74): P1-5-0 #644 5

extra years gained, quality-adjusted (QALY gains) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Discounted QALYs saved by statin use over remaining lifetime, by preventing cardiovascular events (both premature deaths and ongoing morbidity), 10% rate, >=7.5, 6.5-7.4, 5.5-6.4, <5.5 0.0 starting QALYs saved by 5 years statin use are somewhat less than for the above remaining lifetime use: extra years gained, quality-adjusted (QALY gains) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Discounted QALYs saved by statin use over 5 years, by preventing cardiovascular events (both premature deaths and ongoing morbidity), 10% rate, >=7.5, 6.5-7.4, 5.5-6.4, <5.5 0.0 starting Likewise, the model shows patterns of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical costs of treating or not treating various groups with statins. Patients with established CHD have lower non-statin Health Sector costs when treated with statins than those who are not treated. However, this pattern is reversed by the cost of statins causing total costs to be higher for treated groups: P1-5-0 #644 6

Statin analysis cost curves: Rx costs and other costs to Vote:Health of statin vs non-statin treatment over a patient's remaining lifetime, pre-existing CHD, statin price at.60/day $800 $700 Rx costs, treated $600 other Vote:Health costs, untreated $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 1 3 5 7 9 11 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 5 7 9 life expectancy, life expectancy, untreated treated annual patient cost other Vote:Health costs, treated total costs (Rx + other Vote:Health), treated year Note that the above and all following graphs relate to statins priced at.60 weighted average daily cost. Non-statin Health Sector costs are lower and occur later for patients without established CHD, but patterns are otherwise similar to CHD for treated and untreated patients: Statin analysis cost curves: Rx costs and other costs to Vote:Health of statin vs non-statin treatment over a patient's remaining lifetime, pre-existing CHD, statin price at.60/day $600 others $500 $400 Rx costs other Vote:Health costs, untreated other Vote:Health costs, treated with statins annual patient cost $300 $200 $100 1 7 9 11 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 year 11 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 P1-5-0 #644 7

Statin analysis cost curves: total costs to Vote:Health of statin vs non-statin treatment over a patient's remaining lifetime, statin price at.60/day $800 $700 $600 difference between treated and untreated total costs, past CHD, untreated, other Vote:Health costs others, untreated, other Vote:Health costs, treated, total costs (Rx + other Vote:Health) annual patient cost $500 $400 $300 others, treated, total costs (Rx + other Vote:Health) $200 $100 difference between treated and untreated total costs, others 1 3 5 7 9 11 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 year Savings from statin use occur early on, as non-statin Health Sector costs decrease alongside reduced cardiovascular events. This pattern reverses in later years as treated patients incur higher costs when surviving for longer: $250 Statin analysis cost curves: offsets and net costs of statin vs non-statin treatment over a patient's remaining lifetime, statin price at.60/day $200 $150 difference between total treated costs and total untreated costs (statin costs + other Vote:Health costs) $100 annual patient cost $50 1 3 5 7 9 11 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 -$50, net other Vote:Health costs (treated minus untreated) -$100 others, net other Vote:Health costs (treated minus untreated) -$150 -$200 difference between treated and untreated non-statin Vote:Health costs (-ve values = savings) year, net total costs (treated (Rx + other Vote :Health) minus untreated) others, net total costs (treated (Rx + other Vote :Health) minus untreated) P1-5-0 #644 8

120% 100% 80% Discounted other Vote:Health cost offsets from statins use over remaining lifetime, statin price at.60/day where offsets = (discounted lifetime net HS costs)/(discounted lifetime Rx statin costs), >=7.5, 6.5-7.4, 5.5-6.4, <5.5 % offsets 60% 40% 20% 0% Patterns of net costs differ for 5-year statin use when compared with the above remaining lifetime use: % offsets 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% Discounted other Vote:Health cost offsets from statins use over 5 years, statin price at.60/day where offsets = (discounted lifetime net HS costs)/(discounted lifetime Rx statin costs), >=7.5, 6.5-7.4, 5.5-6.4, <5.5 40% 20% 0% QALY gain and net cost patterns combine to form cost/qaly patterns. Cost/QALYs largely relate to overall cardiovascular risk. Best value-for-money (lowest cost/qalys) occurs with those groups with highest absolute cardiovascular risk, i.e. patients with established CHD and total cholesterol >= 7.5 mmol/l. Value decreases (cost/qalys increase) as absolute risk P1-5-0 #644 9

decreases. For most risk groups, especially very high risk, value is greatest at younger age - groups. However, for low risk patients (<10% 5-year risk) value is lowest at younger ages: $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 Discounted cost/qalys from statin use over remaining lifetime, statin price at.60/day, >=7.5, 6.5-7.4, 5.5-6.4, <5.5 $/QALY $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $40,000 $,000 $30,000 $25,000 Discounted cost/qalys from statin use over remaining lifetime, statin price at.60/day, >=7.5, 6.5-7.4, 5.5-6.4, <5.5 $/QALY $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 Patterns again differ for 5-year statin use when compared with the above remaining lifetime use: P1-5-0 #644 10

$7,000 $6,000 $5,000 Discounted cost/qalys from statin use over 5 years, statin price at.60/day, >=7.5, 6.5-7.4, 5.5-6.4, <5.5 $/QALY $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $40,000 $,000 $30,000 $25,000 Discounted cost/qalys from statin use over 5 years, statin price at.60/day, >=7.5, 6.5-7.4, 5.5-6.4, <5.5 $/QALY $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 P1-5-0 #644 11