The stentless bioprosthesis has many salient features that

Similar documents
Aortic root enlargement is an invaluable surgical technique

Anatomy determines the close vicinity of the sinuses of

Operative Strategy. Operative Technique

Disease of the aortic valve is frequently associated with

Aortic valve repair is an accepted option for aortic valve

14 Valvular Stenosis

An anterior aortoventriculoplasty, known as the Konno-

CROWN PRT. Inservice implantation guide

The modified Konno procedure, or subaortic ventriculoplasty,

How to Perform a Valve Sparing Root Replacement Joseph S. Coselli, M.D.

Replacement of the mitral valve in the presence of

Functional anatomy of the aortic root. ΔΡΟΣΟΣ ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΣ Διεσθσνηής Καρδιοθωρακοτειροσργικής Κλινικής Γ.Ν. «Γ. Παπανικολάοσ» Θεζζαλονίκη

MITROFLOW VALSALVA CONDUIT TM

Aortic valve repair is a technique that is gaining popularity

Mechanical Bleeding Complications During Heart Surgery

Valve-sparing versus composite root replacement procedures in patients with Marfan syndrome

The Rastelli procedure has been traditionally used for repair

Posterior leaflet prolapse is the most common lesion seen

The arterial switch operation has been the accepted procedure

Introduction. Aortic Valve. Outflow Tract and Aortic Valve Annulus

Experience with 500 Stentless Aortic Valve Replacements

New Technique for Aortic Valve Functional Annulus Reshaping Using a Handmade Prosthetic Ring

In Vitro Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Imaging of a Stented Porcine Bioprosthetic Valve: The Bent Strut Artifact

Annular Stabilization Techniques in the Context of Aortic Valve Repair

Anatomy of left ventricular outflow tract'

Indications and Late Results of Aortic Valve Repair

AORTIC ROOT RECONSTRUCTION WITH PRESERVATION OF NATIVE AORTIC VALVE AND SINUSES IN AORTIC ROOT DILATATION WITH AORTIC REGURGITATION

Despite advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology

NARRATOR NEAL KON, M.D.

Aortic valve repair: When and how to employ this novel approach?

Dr Winnie Sze-Wun Chan. Cardiac Team Deputy Team Head Department of Radiology and Imaging Queen Elizabeth Hospital Hong Kong

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) at the Johns

Mitral valve infective endocarditis (IE) is the most

PROVEN PLUS. Introducing the Avalus Aortic Valve by Medtronic.

An Appraisal of the Ross Procedure: Goals and Technical Guidelines

Case. 15-year-old boy with bicuspid AV Severe AR with moderate AS. Ross vs. AVR (or AVP)

S. Bert Litwin, MD. Preface

Imaging in TAVI. Jeroen J Bax Dept of Cardiology Leiden Univ Medical Center The Netherlands Davos, feb 2013

Anatomy of aortic valve and root

Eight-Year Results of Aortic Root Replacement With the Freestyle Stentless Porcine Aortic Root Bioprosthesis

Hemodynamics Benefit of Supra-Annular Design in Failed Bio-Prosthetic Valves

Hypoplasia of the aortic root1 The problem of aortic valve replacement

hnplant Technique for the Sorin Stentless Pericardial Valve

State of the art in reconstruction of the ascending aorta with or without valve reconstruction

Techniques to preserve the native aortic valve during aortic

Acute type A aortic dissection (Type I, proximal, ascending)

I replacement was initiated in the early 1960s by Ross [l]

Anatomy of the coronary arteries in transposition

Autologous Pulmonary Valve Replacement of the Diseased Aortic Valve

PPM: How to fit a big valve in a small heart

Aortic valve repair: Techniques and Pitfalls. Allan Stewart, MD Columbia University Medical Center New York, NY

Teclmique for Aortic Valve Replacement With Bioprosthetic and Prosthetic Valves

Anatomy of aortic valve and root Emmanuel Lansac MD PhD

Transcatheter aortic valves in aortic regurgitation Gry Dahle Dept of Cardiothoracic- and vascular surgery Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital,

Results of Aortic Valve Preservation and Repair

Minimal access aortic valve surgery has become one of

Reconstructive surgery of the aortic root

Joseph E. Bavaria, M.D. Roberts Measy Professor and Vice Chief CardioVascular Surgery Director: Thoracic Aortic Surgery Program University of

Aortic Valve Repair - Alternative to Replacement

Stentless aortic valves. Current aspects

Management of Difficult Aortic Root, Old and New solutions

UNIRING, Universal Annuloplasty System Overview and Surgical Guidelines

Aortic root reconstructive surgery - new created technique for aortic stenosis

The radial procedure was developed as an outgrowth

The Aortic Annulus: The Role of CT Angiography In Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Surgical Procedures and Complications

Surgical Repair of the Mitral Valve Presenter: Graham McCrystal Cardiothoracic Surgeon Christchurch Public Hospital

TAVR or SAVR: Beyond the STS Score

Repair of the aortic valve in patients with insufficiency and aortic root aneurysm

Tricuspid Valve Repair for Ebstein's Anomaly

The need for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction

New Cardiovascular Devices and Interventions: Non-Contrast MRI for TAVR Abhishek Chaturvedi Assistant Professor. Cardiothoracic Radiology

Reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous body during aortic and

I removed together with the main trunk of the pulmonary

Sparing aortic valve techniques

Regurgitant Lesions. Bicol Hospital, Legazpi City, Philippines July Gregg S. Pressman MD, FACC, FASE Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia, USA

Minimally invasive valve-sparing aortic root reimplantation

Coronary Artery from the Wrong Sinus of Valsalva: A Physiologic Repair Strategy

Surgical Treatment of Pseudoaneurysm of the Sinus of Valsalva after Aortic Valve Replacement for Active Infective Endocarditis

Aortic Valve Resuspension in Ascending Aortic Aneurysm Repair With Aortic Insufficiency

Severity of AS Degree of AV calcification (? Bicuspid AV), annulus size, & aortic root

Heart transplantation is the gold standard treatment for

Repair of Congenital Mitral Valve Insufficiency

Two semilunar valves. Two atrioventricular valves. Valves of the heart. Left atrioventricular or bicuspid valve Mitral valve

The increasing number of elderly patients with complex

Joseph E. Bavaria, M.D. Roberts Measy Professor and Vice Chief CardioVascular Surgery Director: Thoracic Aortic Surgery Program University of

TSDA Boot Camp September 13-16, Introduction to Aortic Valve Surgery. George L. Hicks, Jr., MD

Joseph E. Bavaria, MD

Excellence in heart and lung care. Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP

Aortic root aneurysm: Principles of repair and long-term follow-up

Eva Maria Delmo Walter Takeshi Komoda Roland Hetzer

New York Valves Patient focused evidence-based approach. New York City: 6 December Antonio Colombo

The Bicuspid AV Surgical Conisiderations

Aortic Valve Repair a Modular and Geometric Approach. H.-J. Schäfers Dept. of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery University Hospital of Saarland

Prof. Dr. Thomas Walther. TAVI in ascending aorta / aortic root dilatation

TEE guided TAVR using BASILICA technique in patient with stenotic Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis

ACL Primary Repair Surgical Technique

CoreValve in a Degenerative Surgical Valve

Transcription:

Aortic Valve Replacement with the Medtronic Freestyle Xenograft Using the Subcoronary Implantation Technique D. Michael Deeb, MD The stentless bioprosthesis has many salient features that make it an attractive option for aortic valve replacement. It has excellent hemodynamic properties, does not require that the patient have anticoagulation, is readily available off University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI. Address reprint requests to D. Michael Deeb, Professor of Surgery, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. E-mail: mdeeb@umich.edu. the shelf, and is versatile, so it can be used in many pathologic conditions as a valve or a root conduit. Accordingly, it is our prosthesis of choice in most circumstances. It is our observation that the improved hemodynamics, even early postoperatively, offset any concern about the increased operative risk due to complexity of the implantation. This article describes our technique for implantation of the stentless prosthesis in a modified subcoronary position to be used in patients with valvular disease and normal sinuses of Valsalva. 1522-2942/06/$-see front matter 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1053/j.optechstcvs.2006.08.001 173

174 D.M. Deeb Operative Techniques Figure 1 A transverse aortotomy is performed preferentially. The aorta is partially transected 1.5 to 2 cm above the right coronary artery. Looking inside the aorta, the incision is extended 1.5 to 2 cm above the left coronary ostium and to the right, ending 1.5 to 2 cm above the left noncoronary commissural post. Figure 2 Optimal visualization of the aorta is obtained by placing stay sutures at the tops of the commissures. This procedure holds back the edges of the ascending aorta, permitting one to inspect the pathologic condition of the valves and determine the symmetry and number of commissures present, which is important for lining up the new prosthesis.

Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis 175 Figure 3 On occasion, one discovers that this aortotomy is a bit too low to permit implantation of the Medtronic Freestyle stentless xenograft in the subcoronary position. The aortotomy can be repaired in a straightforward manner as shown in this figure, and a second more distal transverse aortotomy can be made as desired. Figure 4 The anatomy of the patient s aortic valve must be defined after completely excising the diseased valve leaflets and debriding the annulus and aortic wall of calcium. The patient s left right commissure is used as the reference point for implantation of the new valve. The height of the coronary artery ostia above the surgical annulus and their relationship to the commissures should be noted. If calcification of the aortic wall underneath the coronary ostia is extensive, it may be necessary to implant the bioprosthesis using a full root technique. If the calcium is limited to the annulus, however, or to other areas of the aortic wall, sutures can be taken completely through the Freestyle bioprosthesis and native aortic wall for the subcoronary technique.

176 D.M. Deeb Figure 5 The appropriate-size valve is determined by placing the sizer at the plane of implantation, which is at the lowest level (nadir) of the surgical annulus. Figure 6 The Freestyle sizer need not pass through the annulus into the ventricle but need only sit on the nadir of the three cusps without impinging on the sinus tissue. The valve should not be undersized when implanted in the subcoronary position. After the appropriate valve size is chosen, the Freestyle bioprosthesis may be rinsed while the inflow suture line is placed. If the annulus is larger than the largest available Freestyle bioprosthesis, the annulus may be plicated to accommodate the valve. This is accomplished by placing U stitches at the level of the aortoventricular junction below the commissures. These sutures may be tied down with the appropriate-size Freestyle valve sizer in place to assure appropriate dimensions. If the sinotubular junction is more than 2 mm larger than the patient s annulus, consideration should be made to implant the prosthesis as a freestanding root or using the inclusion root technique.

Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis 177 Figure 7 The inflow sutures are placed using the patient s left-to-right commissure as the reference point of origin. Starting there, 2-0 braided polyester sutures are placed in a simple fashion in the horizontal plane based on the level of the nadir of the annulus (at the aortoventricular junction). These sutures should be placed in the muscle below the left right commissure and in the fibrous tissue and valvular tissue below the right-noncommissures and leftnoncommissures. Sutures should be placed 2 to 3 mm apart starting at the level of the annulus in the muscular tissue below the left right commissure. Do not attempt to align the Freestyle valve commissures with the patient s native commissures unless the patient s commissures are perfectly symmetrical. Suture-needle guides can be used to keep sutures organized. Place the bottom inflow stitch in the B location and then use that inflow needle to put the stitch through the bioprosthesis. Sutures placed in the muscle below the left right commissure should be generous bites because muscle tissue is friable and prone to tearing. Sutures placed in the conduction area may be shallow because this tissue is fibrous. Figure 8 Before implanting the Freestyle bioprosthesis, it is important to determine whether the valve can be implanted with the prosthesis coronary sinuses corresponding anatomically to the patient s coronary sinuses or if it will be necessary to rotate the valve. If the valve is to be implanted orthotopically, the left and right sinuses of the valve are excised with a millimeter margin of Freestyle aortic wall remaining along the leaflet tissue and commissural posts to allow for adequate suturing. Alternatively, the Freestyle bioprosthesis can be trimmed after it is seated.

178 D.M. Deeb Figure 9 The valve sutures are placed starting at the leftto-right commissure, dividing the sutures in equal thirds. The first stitch in each third will then be placed through the inflow suture cuff of the Freestyle prosthesis at the point corresponding to the bioprosthesis commissure, indicated by the double green solid vertical markers on the sewing cuff. This process aligns the Freestyle bioprosthesis symmetrically for implantation, independent of the location of the patient s commissures. The green horizontal line at the inflow edge of the bioprosthesis indicates the area for suture placement. Do not place sutures above the dotted green line. The remaining sutures are placed evenly between the respective commissures. Begin tying the noncoronary sinus sutures and continue around the annulus.

Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis 179 Figure 10 When placing a stitch through the sewing cuff, do not completely pass the needle through the cuff until all sutures between the two commissures have been inserted and even spacing has been confirmed. This allows for easy repositioning of sutures if spacing appears uneven. Leave the sutures in the muscle under the left right commissure to be tied last, because this tissue is the most friable, and knots will be more secure if the valve is seated by the other sutures first. Figure 11 The outflow suture line is performed with a running technique using a double-armed 4-0 polypropylene suture. The suture line is begun at the left coronary sinus starting half the distance up the left right commissural post. Using the rim of tissue that remains on the Freestyle valve, run the suture line up to the top of the left-noncoronary commissure. Complete the suture line to the top of the left right commissural post.

180 D.M. Deeb Figure 12 The subcoronary suture line under the right coronary ostia is performed as a mirror image of the previous suture line. Note that the larger area of the polyester covering on the Freestyle bioprosthesis is below this suture line. When running this suture line under the coronary arteries, make sure that the needle does not exit in the openings. Place the first three to four stitches backhand with a needle holder placed proximally on the needle to create a sharp arch. Do not tack the Freestyle commissures to the patient s aorta with stay sutures because it is important to be able to move the distal end of the bioprosthesis to facilitate exposure. An assistant may pull up on the patient s aorta and move the left right post to the side to facilitate running sutures under the coronary ostium. Figure 13 (A-C) The remaining prosthetic tissue can then be trimmed to size, matching the height of the noncoronary sinus of the prosthesis to the height of the noncoronary sinus of the patient. The tails of the 4-0 suture used in the subcoronary suture lines beneath the right and left coronary ostia are then continued across the top of the noncoronary sinus to complete the suture line. The aortotomy is then closed in the usual manner.

Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis 181 Figure 14 (A, B) In some situations the Freestyle bioprosthesis may need to be rotated 120. This is particularly relevant when one has a normal-size root with a relatively low right coronary artery. Recall that the larger area of polyester covering of the Freestyle bioprosthesis is located below the porcine right coronary artery. If this is the case, the left and noncoronary sinuses may be excised such that the right noncoronary sinus is in the patient s left coronary sinus and the Freestyle left coronary sinus sits in the patient s right coronary sinus. The porcine right coronary sinus will then sit in the patient s noncoronary sinus. To facilitate this fit, the remnant of the right coronary ostium of the bioprosthesis should be excised and closed with 4-0 sutures. The needles used to accomplish this can then be driven through the wall of the patient s noncoronary sinus to obliterate this potential space.

182 D.M. Deeb Figure 15 (A, B) If the patient s annulus measures larger than the largest available Freestyle valve, a subvalvular annuloplasty can be performed to reduce the circumference of the aortic wall. Using the Freestyle sizer as a guide for plication, a pledgeted U suture is placed at the base of the commissure. Either one, two, or all three commissures can then be plicated as necessary to reduce the annular diameter. If the sinotubular junction is larger than the largest valve but not greater than two valve sizes larger, the root inclusion technique can be performed to tailor the patient s sinotubular junction down to fit the crown of the Freestyle bioprosthesis. If the sinotubular junction is more than two valve sizes larger, the bioprosthesis should be implanted as a full root.

Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis 183 Figure 16 If the aortic root needs to be enlarged because the noncoronary wall of the bioprosthesis appears to buckle within the patient s aorta once the right and left coronary sinuses are secured, an incision into the noncoronary sinus can be made as shown in this figure and closed in a V-shaped fashion to the back wall of the bioprosthesis.

184 D.M. Deeb Figure 17 (A, B) In the patient with a bicuspid aortic valve in which both leaflets are of similar size, the left and right coronary ostia may be almost directly opposite one another. In this circumstance, after excising the diseased valve leaflets, one should determine the shortest distance between the left and the right coronary ostia. In most instances, the coronary ostia will not be quite 180 apart. The left right commissural post of the Freestyle bioprosthesis should then be centered in the middle of the shortest distance between the right and left ostia. This will generally permit subcoronary implantation. If not, a full root technique should again be used. Conclusions The stentless valve used in a modified subcoronary technique is a more complex and time-consuming technique than implantation of a stented bioprosthesis. However, this prosthesis allows for upsizing of the replacement valve for a larger effective orifice area and improved hemodynamics. A stented bioprosthesis will also allow for better exercise response than a stented valve. Given these features, this is an excellent valve for patients with small roots or active patients who want superior exercise capabilities.