Evaluating the Effectiveness of Iron Chelates in Managing Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Grain Sorghum

Similar documents
Micronutrient Management. Dorivar Ruiz Diaz Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management

Fertility management in soybean

Dry Bean Fertility Dave Franzen NDSU Soil Science Specialist

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

In mid-october, all plots were again soil sampled to determine residual nutrients.

What s new with micronutrients in our part of the world?

Wednesday February 12, 2014 Managing P and Zn

Nutrient management irrigated corn. Jim Camberato

AGVISE Laboratories Established 1976

MU Cropping Systems Rice Research Review. Matthew Rhine University of Missouri

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. Volume II, Issue 5 October 05

Potassium Deficiency in Cotton Early Detection and Alleviation

Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Potassium and Phosphorus as Plant Nutrients. Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. Potassium is required in large amounts by many crops

PSB FIELD ASSAYS. 1 Trial No. 23 Ref no: IPL/KHA/SH/PPX/54 2 Product PS Bacteria 2 % A.S. 3 Crop Name Sorghum

Managing Micronutrients with Soil (Plant) Testing and Fertilizer

Nutrient Recommendations Agronomic Crops Last Updated 12/1/16. Grain Corn. Crop Highlights Target ph: 6.0

Recent soybean fertility studies. R. Jay Goos and Hannah Ohm Department of Soil Science North Dakota State University

Correction of Zinc Deficiency in Avocado

Nutrients. Carbon, Hydrogen, and Oxygen 1/18/2012. Soils, Nutrients and Fertilizers Part I I. 17 elements essential for plant growth

Using Tissue and Soil Tests Together Helps Make Better Decisions. John Lee Soil Scientist AGVISE Northwood, ND

In-depth studies initiated: Results:

Plant Food. Nitrogen (N)

Trace Yet Substantial

Soybean Soil Fertility

AgriCal by. Healthier Soils Stronger Plants Higher Yields

Research Report Forage Sorghum Hybrid Yield and Quality at Maricopa, AZ, 2015

12. ZINC - The Major Minor

COMPARISON OF IMPREGNATED DRY FERTILIZER WITH S AND ZN BLENDS FOR CORN AND SOYBEANS

Irrigation Management In Rice. Matthew Rhine University of Missouri

Objectives: 1. Determine the effect of nitrogen and potassium applications on sugar beet root yield and quality.

Corn and soybean yield responses to micronutrients fertilization

MICRO NUTRIENTS AND SECONDARY NUTRIENTS

Variation in chemical composition of soybean hulls

REMEMBER as we go through this exercise: Science is the art of making simple things complicated!

INTERPRETING SOIL & LEAF ANALYSIS

How to Develop a Balanced Program for Pecan and Chili. Robert R Smith

May 2008 AG/Soils/ pr Understanding Your Soil Test Report Grant E. Cardon Jan Kotuby-Amacher Pam Hole Rich Koenig General Information

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Micronutrient Requirements of Crops

The following is a brief description of the symptoms of some of the most common nutrient deficiencies in soybeans. Nutrient deficiency symptoms

Nutrition. Grain Legume Handbook

INFLUENCE OF PLANT PARTS ON IN VITRO DRY MATTER DISAPPEARANCE OF FORAGE SORGHUM SILAGES. J. White and K.K. Bolsen

Lime Fertilizer Interactions Affecting Vegetable Crop Production' Delbert D. Hemphill, Jr., and T. L. ABSTRACT

IRON CHLOROSIS IN AVOCADOS

in Cotton Dr. Steve Phillips Director, Southeast USA

5. Plant Physiology/Chemistry Section

1. Zinc as a plant nutrient 1 2. Preparing for a prescribed burn 2 3. Fertilizing cotton 4

An IPM 1 Approach to Managing Herbicide Resistant Ryegrass in Northeast Texas. October, 2014 J. Swart, A. Braley, R. Sutton, S. Stewart, D.

Chapter 7: Micronutrient Management

Yield and quality of cumin as influenced by FYM enriched micronutrients

Optimizing Dietary Net Energy for Maximum Profitability in Growing- Finishing Pigs

Bioavailability of Cd to Food Crops in

Secondary and Micronutrients

Plant Health Solutions

Soybean Nutrient Profile

Effects of Increasing Crystalline Amino Acids in Sorghum- or Corn-based Diets on Finishing Pig Growth Performance and Carcass Composition

IRon chlorosis. on tuq~ CjQasses oqnamentals vecjetables - L-435

Nitrogen Studies in Corn and Wheat. Joel Ransom NDSU Extension Agronomist

Effectiveness on Soil and Foliar Applied Micronutrient Mixes

Almond Nitrogen Nutrition

Chapter 1: Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management

Final Report 2015 Field Demonstrations of Sorghum Forages for the California Dairy Industry

Improving Management Of Soybean Cyst Nematode Through Extension Demonstration And Outreach

MANAGING MARESTAIL AND GIANT RAGWEED IN WHEAT

SOIL PH IN RELATION TO BROWN STEM ROT AND SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE N.C. Kurtzweil 1, C.R. Grau 2, A.E. MacGuidwin 3, J.M. Gaska 4, and A.W.

Effects of ammonium sulphate on the growth and yield of different tomato((lecopersicon esculentum) plant in the city jahrom

2015 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut, Jay, FL

HERE ARE SOME ANSWERS TO OUR CUSTOMERS MOST OFTEN ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT Calcium-25

Table 1. Wheat grain nutrient concentrations (Norton, 2011) and critical nutrient concentrations (Reuter and Robinson, 1997)

Understanding a Soil Report

Barley and Sugarbeet Symposium

Specialists In Soil Fertility, Plant Nutrition and Irrigation Water Quality Management.

Title: Overview of Micronutrients and Focus on Fe and Mn Speaker: Bill Pan. online.wsu.edu

Enhancing Forages with Nutrient Dense Sprays 2013 Trials

Limitations to Plant Analysis. John Peters & Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Nutrition in Container Crops. Dr. James Altland

HUMIC SOLUTIONS THE NEXT GENERATION OF SOIL HEALTH DISPERSIBLE SOLUBLE SPREADABLE BLENDABLE

Understanding Your Soil Report. Michael Cook 2018

Fertilization Programming

2006- Foliar insecticide effects on soybean aphid and soybean yield. Summary Background Objective Site and application description

COMPARISON THE EFFECTS OF SPRAYING DIFFERENT AMOUNTS OF NANO ZINCOXIDE AND ZINC OXIDE ON, WHEAT

Çukurova Research Enstitü, Forage Crops Department, Adana, Turkey 2. Çukurova University, Agriculture Faculty Field Crops Department, Adana, Turkey

A COMPARISON OF FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY IN A SIMULATED GRAZE-OUT FOR TWELVE VARIETIES OF HARD RED AND WHITE WINTER WHEAT

2009 Elba Muck Soil Nutrient Survey Results Summary, Part III: Calcium, Magnesium and Micronutrients

Larry Stein, Texas A & M AgriLife Extension Service. Nitrogen fertilization materials, rates and timing

Interpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations

Effects of Zn, Fe and Mn on soybean elements concentration

Nutrient Management for Texas High Plains Cotton Production

PLANT NUTRITION. Marasperse AG The Lignosulfonate-Based Complexing Agent for Foliar Micronutrients

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED

Effects of Standardized Ileal Digestible Lysine Content in Low Crude Protein Diets on Finishing Pig Performance and Economics from 230 to 280 lb

Wheat Update September 2017 ARKANSAS WHEAT PERFORMANCE TRIALS AND VARIETY SELECTION. Methods

2001 Annual and Perennial Ryegrass Report

Response of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Levels on Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)

1999 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

Effects of Harvest Date and Late-Summer Fertilization Rate on Stockpiled Bermudagrass Forage Mineral Concentrations

Terry Richmond s Fertilizer Package mentioned in the panel discussion March 14, 2013.

MEASURE AND MANAGE. Zinc. By Dale Cowan Agri-Food Laboratories CCA.On

ABSTRACT: 67 SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE RESISTANCE HOW IT ALL COMES TOGETHER IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES

Transcription:

Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports Volume 2 Issue 6 Kansas Fertilizer Research Article 2 January 2016 Evaluating the Effectiveness of Iron Chelates in Managing Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Grain Sorghum A. Obour Kansas State University, aobour@ksu.edu A. Schlegel Kansas State University, schlegel@ksu.edu R. Perumal Kansas State University, perumal@ksu.edu D. Ruiz Diaz Kansas State University, ruizdiaz@ksu.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://newprairiepress.org/kaesrr Part of the Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Obour, A.; Schlegel, A.; Perumal, R.; and Ruiz Diaz, D. (2016) "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Iron Chelates in Managing Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Grain Sorghum," Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports: Vol. 2: Iss. 6. https://doi.org/ 10.4148/2378-5977.1236 This report is brought to you for free and open access by New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. Copyright January 2016 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Contents of this publication may be freely reproduced for educational purposes. All other rights reserved. Brand names appearing in this publication are for product identification purposes only. No endorsement is intended, nor is criticism implied of similar products not mentioned. K-State Research and Extension is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Iron Chelates in Managing Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Grain Sorghum Abstract Grain sorghum production in alkaline or calcareous soils is frequently affected by iron (Fe) chlorosis. Soil conditions such as high ph, high free calcium carbonate (lime), and low organic matter favor development of Fe deficiency chlorosis (IDC), which can delay crop maturity and reduce yields. Field experiments were conducted in the summer of 2014 and 2015 to determine the effectiveness of Fe chelate application in alleviating IDC in grain sorghum. Treatments were four Fe chelate application rates (0, 3, 6, and 9 lb product/ a) applied either in-furrow with the seed at the time of planting or 2 weeks after planting in 2014. A split treatment of 3 lb/a applied at planting and another 3 lb/a applied 2 weeks after planting was included. The study in 2015 had four Fe chelate rates (0, 3, and 6 lb product/a, and split treatment of 3 lb/a applied at planting and another 3 lb/a applied 2 weeks after planting) as main plots and five commercial sorghum hybrids as sub-plots. Results in 2014 showed IDC scores among the treatments were significant only in the early stages of growth. Iron chelate application did improve sorghum yield, with the highest yield occurring when Fe chelate was split-applied at 6 lb product/a. Grain sorghum hybrids differed in their response to IDC in 2015. Application of Fe chelates suppressed IDC and increased grain yield, particularly in susceptible hybrids in both dryland and irrigated sites. Our findings indicate that sorghum hybrids 86G32 and 87P06 showed promise for tolerance to IDC and that Fe chelate application to reduce IDC is economically feasible at current grain prices. Keywords Grain sorghum, iron deficiency chlorosis, Fe chelates Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This Agricultural Research Center-Hays article is available in Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports: http://newprairiepress.org/kaesrr/vol2/iss6/2

Kansas Fertilizer Research 2016 Evaluating the Effectiveness of Iron Chelates in Managing Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Grain Sorghum A. Obour, A. Schlegel, R. Perumal, and D. Ruiz Diaz Summary Grain sorghum production in alkaline or calcareous soils is frequently affected by iron (Fe) chlorosis. Soil conditions such as high ph, high free calcium carbonate (lime), and low organic matter favor development of Fe deficiency chlorosis (IDC), which can delay crop maturity and reduce yields. Field experiments were conducted in the summer of 2014 and 2015 to determine the effectiveness of Fe chelate application in alleviating IDC in grain sorghum. Treatments were four Fe chelate application rates (0, 3, 6, and 9 lb product/a) applied either in-furrow with the seed at the time of planting or 2 weeks after planting in 2014. A split treatment of 3 lb/a applied at planting and another 3 lb/a applied 2 weeks after planting was included. The study in 2015 had four Fe chelate rates (0, 3, and 6 lb product/a, and split treatment of 3 lb/a applied at planting and another 3 lb/a applied 2 weeks after planting) as main plots and five commercial sorghum hybrids as sub-plots. Results in 2014 showed IDC scores among the treatments were significant only in the early stages of growth. Iron chelate application did improve sorghum yield, with the highest yield occurring when Fe chelate was split-applied at 6 lb product/a. Grain sorghum hybrids differed in their response to IDC in 2015. Application of Fe chelates suppressed IDC and increased grain yield, particularly in susceptible hybrids in both dryland and irrigated sites. Our findings indicate that sorghum hybrids 86G32 and 87P06 showed promise for tolerance to IDC and that Fe chelate application to reduce IDC is economically feasible at current grain prices. Introduction Grain sorghum is susceptible to iron (Fe) deficiency chlorosis (IDC) when grown on high-ph soils in the Great Plains. High ph and free calcium carbonate associated with calcareous soils reduce the availability of Fe to the sorghum plant. This results in IDC with delayed crop maturity and reduced yields. The general approach to alleviating Fe deficiency in sorghum has been the application of foliar or soil amendments; however, these amendments have not been economically feasible on the field scale. Available Fe chelate products that are reported to correct Fe deficiency are too expensive to use on low-value field crops like grain sorghum. Several studies have attempted to develop alternative, cheaper strategies for managing IDC in sorghum. These include breeding and selecting for Fe-efficient sorghum cultivars and application of Fe-containing fertilizer products. 1

Managing IDC is complicated by the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of IDC in sorghum fields. Heterogeneity in soil chemical composition within sorghum fields causes spatial development of IDC in sorghum fields, which creates a major challenge to managing IDC on a field scale. An effective management strategy for preventing IDC in grain sorghum should be a comprehensive approach that considers soil heterogeneity, application of chelated Fe products, and selection of IDC-tolerant sorghum cultivars. Previous research has documented that in-furrow application of ortho-ortho-eddha Fe can reduce IDC in soybean and dry edible beans. Research extending this technology to managing IDC in grain sorghum has been limited. The objectives of this study were to 1) determine the effectiveness of ortho-ortho Fe-EDDHA in alleviating IDC in grain sorghum, and 2) screen grain sorghum hybrids for their tolerance to IDC. Procedures A field experiment was conducted in the summer of 2014 on a producer s field near Holcomb, KS, to evaluate the effectiveness of iron chelate in alleviating IDC in grain sorghum. Treatments were four ortho-ortho-eddha Fe chelate application rates (0, 3, 6, and 9 lb product/a) applied either in-furrow with the seed at the time of planting or two weeks after planting as foliar treatment. A split application treatment of 3 lb product/a applied at planting and another 3 lb product/a applied 2 weeks after planting was included. The study was expanded in 2015 to include sites at Southwest Kansas Agricultural Research Centers (SWREC) in Garden City and Tribune, and at a producer s field near Garden City, KS. The study in Tribune was under irrigated conditions. Treatments were four application rates of ortho-ortho Fe-EDDHA (0, 3, and 6 lb product/a, and split treatment of 3 lb/a applied at planting and another 3 lb/a applied 2 weeks after planting) as main plots and five commercial sorghum hybrids (Pioneer hybrids 86G32, 87P06, 85Y40, Golden Acres hybrid GA5613, and Northrup King hybrid NK5418) as sub-plots. The Fe chelate was applied in-furrow at planting except the split treatment where the chelate was applied at planting plus additional Fe chelate application 2 weeks after planting. All plots received equal amounts of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) applied at 100 and 30 lb/a, respectively. Before planting, three soil core samples were taken from 0- to 15-cm depths from individual plots (individual plots were 10 ft 30 ft), combined to form a composite sample for each block, and analyzed for soil chemical properties. SPAD (chlorophyll meter) readings, IDC scores (a score of 1 means non-chlorotic leaves, 5 means plants with complete leaf chlorosis), and plant height information were taken 30 and 60 days after planting. The plots were harvested in mid-november in 2014 to determine grain yield. Harvesting in 2015 was done in October in Garden City, and mid-november in Tribune. Results Results in 2014 showed IDC scores among the treatments were significant only in the early stages of growth. Split application of Fe chelate at 6 lb product/a did better at suppressing IDC compared to the other chelate treatments (Table 1). At 60 days after planting, IDC was similar among the Fe chelate treatments. In general, severity of IDC tends to decrease over the growing season, confirming the ability of sorghum hybrids to grow out of IDC under favorable environmental conditions. Similarly, relative leaf 2

chlorophyll content (SPAD readings) and plant height at 30 days after planting were greatest when 6 lb/a Fe chelate was split applied. As the growing season progressed, no differences in SPAD readings and plant height were observed among the treatments. Iron chelate application did improve sorghum yield compared to the control. The highest yield occurred when Fe chelate was split applied at 6 lb product/a. SPAD readings, IDC, and grain yield were not affected by Fe-EDDHA application method. Results in 2015 showed that IDC differed among the sorghum hybrids studied. Iron chelate application suppressed IDC, particularly in the highly susceptible hybrids (85Y40 and NK5418) at both the dryland (Table 2) and irrigated locations (Figure 1). Severity of IDC decreased as the growing season progressed at SWREC (Table 2) in Garden City and in Tribune (data not shown) but not in the producer s field (Table 2). Greater severity of IDC at the producer s farm may be due to high carbonate concentrations in the soil and the drought experienced in July. Although Fe concentrations in the soil at the two dryland locations were similar (2.5 mg/kg at SWREC in Garden City, and 2.3 mg/kg at producer s field), calcium carbonate equivalence (CCE) in the soil at the producer s field was 82 g/kg and that in the soil at SWREC was 25 g/kg. In general, sorghum hybrids 87P06, 86G32, and GA5613 were more tolerant to IDC than NK5418 and 85Y40. Similar to IDC scores, SPAD readings were greater with hybrids that showed tolerance to IDC (data not shown). Grain yields were different among the sorghum hybrids at both dryland and irrigated sites. At the dryland sites, yields averaged across Fe treatments were generally greater at SWREC than the producer s field (Figure 2). This may be due to reduced incidence of IDC observed in the later part of the growing season at SWREC. Sorghum hybrid 86G32 produced the greatest yield among the hybrids evaluated at SWREC. However, 87P06 had the highest grain yield at the producer's field (Figure 2). This is due to relatively lower IDC scores observed in 87P06 at the producer s field, particularly in treatments where Fe chelate was split applied at 6 lb/a. Similarly, grain yield of 86G32 was greatest among the hybrids under irrigation in Tribune when averaged across Fe chelate application rates (Figure 3). Averaged across Fe treatments, grain yields with GA5613 and NK5418 were similar to 86G32 under irrigation compared to the dryland sites. When moisture was not limited, grain yields in NK5418 were not significantly affected by Fe chelate (Figure 4). This suggests that in good growing conditions when water is not limited, these hybrids (NK5418 and GA5613) will grow out of IDC and produce decent grain yields. However, 85Y40 consistently produced the lowest grain yield at all sites, confirming greater susceptibility to IDC. Applying Fe chelate to grain sorghum increased grain yield compared to the control at both dryland sites near Garden City and the irrigated site at Tribune (Figure 5 and 6). At Tribune, there was a significant chelate hybrid (P = 0.08) effect on grain yield. This interaction occurred because of the substantial increase in grain yield when Fe chelate was applied to GA5613 and 85Y40. The increase in grain yield due to Fe chelate application was nominal in other sorghum hybrids (Figure 4). Averaged across sorghum hybrids, application of 3 lb/a Fe chelate caused a 2-fold increase in grain yield above the control at the dryland site. At $3.22/bu current grain sorghum sale price, the increase in 3

gross revenue generated with 3 lb/a Fe-EDDHA application is $86.94/a ($3. 22/bu 27 bu/a) for dryland and $54.74/a ($3.22/bu 17 bu/a) for the irrigated site. The cost of 3 lb/a Fe-EDDHA at a retail price of $8 product/lb is $24. It is therefore economically feasible to apply Fe-EDDHA to grain sorghum at current grain prices. Table 1. Grain sorghum yield, iron (Fe) deficiency chlorosis (IDC) scores, and relative leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD) as affected by Fe chelate application IDC score SPAD readings Grain yield, Fe chelate treatment 30 DAP 1 60 DAP 30 DAP 60 DAP bu/a Check 1.9 1.2 29.1 32.1 88.8 3 lb/a in-furrow 1.6 1.2 29.8 33.7 101.2 6 lb/a in-furrow 1.5 1.2 29.7 30.3 104.5 9 lb/a in-furrow 1.4 1.2 30.3 32.1 91.5 3 lb/a postemergence 1.6 1.2 31.0 34.6 106.5 6 lb/a postemergence 1.5 1.1 32.1 33.2 101.8 9 lb/a postemergence 1.6 1.2 31.5 33.4 109.5 6 lb/a split 1.1 1.1 37.4 33.9 109.8 Standard error 0.1 0.1 1.9 2.1 6.5 1 Days after planting. Table 2. Iron chelate application and grain sorghum hybrid effects on iron (Fe) deficiency chlorosis (IDC) scores in grain sorghum at 30 and 60 days after planting at SWREC and a producer s field, Garden City, KS in 2015 Fe chelate rate, lb/a SWREC-Garden City IDC scores at 30 DAP 1 Producer's field-garden City GA5613 NK5418 85Y40 86G32 87P06 GA5613 NK5418 85Y40 86G32 87P06 Check 2.9 3.8 4.1 2.5 2.8 2.2 2.8 2.7 1.6 1.9 3 2.5 2.6 2.3 1.8 2.0 1.3 1.6 2.3 1.8 1.4 6 2.2 2.9 2.7 1.5 1.9 2.2 2.0 1.4 1.0 1.1 6 split 3.0 2.7 2.8 2.3 2.5 1.1 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.2 Standard error 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 IDC 2 scores at 60 DAP Check 3.2 3.8 4.5 1.4 2.2 3.5 3.5 3.8 3.2 3.2 3 1.8 2.0 2.2 1.1 1.7 3.3 3.8 3.9 3.3 3.2 6 2.4 2.7 2.6 1.4 1.6 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.0 2.8 6 split 2.6 2.0 3.0 1.2 1.3 2.5 2.5 3.5 2.7 2.3 Standard error 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 1 Days after planting. 2 Iron deficiency chlorosis score (IDC), a score of 1 means non-chlorotic leaves and 5 means plants with complete leaf chlorosis. 4

Kansas Fertilizer Research 2016 Check plot 3 lb/a Figure 1. Application of Fe chelate suppressed IDC in susceptible hybrids (e.g. Pioneer 85Y40). The control treatment (top) and a plot that received 3 lb/a Fe chelate (bottom) show the difference between treatments. Photos were taken on August 4, 2015 (60 days after planting at Tribune, KS). 5

100 90 SWREC Producer 80 Grain yield, bu/a 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 85Y40 NK5418 GA5613 87P06 86G32 Sorghum hybrid Figure 2. Grain yield of sorghum hybrids at the two dryland sites at SWREC and a producer s field in Garden City, KS. Means are averaged across Fe chelate. 160 140 Sorghum grain yield, bu/a 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 85Y40 87P06 GA5613 NK5418 86G32 Sorghum hybrid Figure 3. Grain yield of sorghum hybrids under irrigation at SWREC in Tribune, KS. Means are averaged across Fe chelate treatments. 6

180 160 0 lb/a 3 lb/a 6 lb/a 6 lb/a split Sorghum grain yield, bu/a 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 NK5418 GA5613 85Y40 86G32 87P06 Sorghum hybrid Figure 4. Sorghum grain yield as affected by iron chelate application and sorghum genotype under irrigation at Tribune, KS. 80 70 60 Grain yield, bu/a 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 3 6 6 split Iron chelate application rate, lb/a Figure 5. Sorghum grain yield as affected by iron chelate application across the two-dryland locations in Garden City, KS. 7

160 140 Sorghum grain yield, bu/a 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 3 6 6 split Iron chelate application rate, lb/a Figure 6. Sorghum grain yield as affected by iron chelate application under irrigated conditions in Tribune, KS. 8