Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Columbia University Medical Center, New York.

Similar documents
The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

Imaging Overview for Vulnerable Plaque: Data from IVUS Trial and An Introduction to VH-IVUS Imgaging

Can IVUS Define Plaque Features that Impact Patient Care?

Assessment of Vulnerable Plaque by IVUS and VH-IVUS

Invasive Coronary Imaging Modalities for Vulnerable Plaque Detection

Imaging Atheroma The quest for the Vulnerable Plaque

Culprit Lesion Remodeling and Long-term (> 5years) Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Gary S. Mintz,, MD. IVUS Observations in Acute (vs Chronic) Coronary Artery Disease: Structure vs Function

Added Value of Invasive Coronary Imaging for Plaque Rupture and Erosion

OCT; Comparative Imaging Results with IVUS, VH and Angioscopy

Plaque Characteristics in Coronary Artery Disease. Chourmouzios Arampatzis MD, PhD, FESC

OCT Findings: Lesson from Stable vs Unstable Plaques

The Dynamic Nature of Coronary Artery Lesion Morphology Assessed by Serial Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound Tissue Characterization

Assessment of plaque morphology by OCT in patients with ACS

Dynamic Nature of Nonculprit Coronary Artery Lesion Morphology in STEMI

Optical Coherence Tomography for Intracoronary Imaging

IVUS Analysis. Myeong-Ki. Hong, MD, PhD. Cardiac Center, Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Medical sciences 1 (2017) 1 9

Can We Identify Vulnerable Patients & Vulnerable Plaque?

Bifurcation stenting with BVS

대한심장학회춘계학술대회 Satellite Symposium

Integrated Use of IVUS and FFR for LM Stenting

Between Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve

Quick guide. Core. precision guided therapy system

Adverse Cardiovascular Events Arising From Atherosclerotic Lesions With and Without Angiographic Disease Progression

Integrating IVUS, FFR, and Noninvasive Imaging to Optimize Outcomes. Gary S. Mintz, MD Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Coronary Artery Thermography

1st Department of Cardiology, University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece

Declaration of conflict of interest. Nothing to disclose

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary lesions: Can You Handle the Pressure? Jeffrey A Southard, MD May 4, 2013

Spotty Calcification as a Marker of Accelerated Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis : Insights from Serial Intravascular Ultrasound

Plaque Shift vs. Carina Shift Prevalence and Implication

Machine Learning in Precision Medicine Coronary Health Prediction - Cardiac Events (Atherosclerosis) - Heart Transplant (Vasculopathy)

So-Yeon Choi, MD., PhD. Department of Cardiology Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea

Usefulness of OCT during coronary intervention

2yrs 2-6yrs >6yrs BMS 0% 22% 42% DES 29% 41% Nakazawa et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:

Characterization of coronary plaques with combined use of intravascular ultrasound, virtual histology and optical coherence tomography

Jose Mª de la Torre Hernandez, MD, PhD, FESC. Cardiologia Valdecilla Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla Santander. SPAIN

Post PCI functional testing and imaging: case based lessons from FFR React

Assessment of vulnerable plaque by OCT

Left main coronary artery (LMCA): The proximal segment

Pathology of Vulnerable Plaque Angioplasty Summit 2005 TCT Asia Pacific, Seoul, April 28-30, 2005

IVUS-Guided d Provisional i Stenting: Plaque or Carina Shift. Soo-Jin Kang, MD., PhD.

Chapter 11. Departments of 1 Cardiology and 2 Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. Department of Cardiology,

Noninvasive Coronary Imaging: Plaque Imaging by MDCT

IVUS Virtual Histology. Listening through Walls D. Geoffrey Vince, PhD The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY. Konstantina P. Bouki, FESC 2 nd Department of Cardiology General Hospital Of Nikea, Pireaus

as a Mechanism of Stent Failure

DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

FFR in Left Main Disease

A Novel Low Pressure Self Expanding Nitinol Coronary Stent (vprotect): Device Design and FIH Experience

PCI for Left Anterior Descending Artery Ostial Stenosis

Invasive Imaging (IVUS, VH-IVUS, and OCT): How I Implement into My

The Site of Plaque Rupture in Native Coronary Arteries

pissn: , eissn: Yonsei Med J 54(2): , 2013

PCI for Long Coronary Lesion

Defining Plaque Composition by CTA: The Latest Tool to Monitor Therapy?

LM stenting - Cypher

EBC London 2013 Provisional SB stenting strategy with kissing balloon with Absorb

Invasive Evaluation of High Risk or Vulnerable Plaque A Powerful Tool to Address Potential Pharmacological Agents? Jagat Narula, MD PhD MACC

The Future of intravascular Is there light or sound at the end of the tunnel? Hybrid Imaging

Role of Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

Unprotected LM intervention

New Insight about FFR and IVUS MLA

FIRST: Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound Relationship Study

Failure of positive. Recanalization and CTO formation. TCFA rupture with (fatal) thrombotic occlusion. TCFA Lipid pool

Head-to-Head Comparison of Coronary Plaque Evaluation Between Multislice Computed Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Radiofrequency Data Analysis

Le espressioni della placca che preoccupano il clinico: progressione o vulnerabilità? CardioLUCCA Marzo 2017

FESC, FACC, MAHA, MSCAI, MEAPSI, ESH

Reproducibility of Intravascular Ultrasound imap for Radiofrequency Data Analysis: Implications for Design of Longitudinal Studies

OCT guidance for distal LM lesions

Debate Should we use FFR? I will say NO.

Basics of Angiographic Interpretation Analysis of Angiography

Calcium Removal and Plaque Modification in the Era of DEB and Contemporary Stenting for Femoro- Popliteal Disease

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

Tissue Characterization of Coronary Plaques Using Intravascular Ultrasound/Virtual Histology

ARMYDA-RECAPTURE (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) trial

Cottrell Memorial Lecture. Has Reversing Atherosclerosis Become the New Gold Standard in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease?

eluting Stents The SPIRIT Trials

MR Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaques

Quinn Capers, IV, MD

Bernard Chevalier Institut Jacques Cartier, Massy, France. Patrick W. Serruys Imperial College, London, UK Erasmus University MC, Netherlands

A Case Series of Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound in Carotid Artery Stenting

Spotty Calcification Typifies the Culprit Plaque in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction An Intravascular Ultrasound Study

Intervention: How and to which extent is technology helping us?

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G.

Title for Paragraph Format Slide

Left Main Intervention: Will it become standard of care?

For Personal Use. Copyright HMP 2013

Optical Coherence Tomography

Chapter 43 Noninvasive Coronary Plaque Imaging

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

FFR and intravascular imaging, which of which?

Acute Myocardial Infarction. Willis E. Godin D.O., FACC

Side Branch Occlusion

The SYNTAX-LE MANS Study

Intracoronary Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) Imaging for Detection of Lipid Content of Coronary Plaques: Current Experience and Future Perspectives

Transcription:

Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis of Non-culprit Attenuated Plaques Detected by Grayscale Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Xiaofan Wu, Akiko Maehara, Gary S. Mintz, Takashi Kubo, Kai Xu, So-Yeon Choi, Yong He, Ning Guo, Jeffrey W. Moses, Martin B. Leon, Bernard De Bruyne, Patrick W. Serruys, Gregg W. Stone Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Columbia University Medical Center, New York.

Bernard De Bruyne Disclosure Gary S. Mintz A member of the speakers bureau, serves as a consultant, has received research/grant support, and a stockholder with Volcano Corporation Takashi Kubo Has received research-grant support from Volcano Corporation Martin B. Leon and Gregg W. Stone Serve as consultants for Volcano Corporation Patrick W. Serruys The other authors NO relationships to disclosure

Attenuated plaque & Histopathology Attenuated plaque is defined as hypoechoic or mixed atheroma with ultrasound attenuation without evidence of calcification in grayscale IVUS Histopathologically, attenuated plaque contains microcalcifications and cholesterol crystals Ultrasound attenuation Cholesterol cleft Microcalcification behind plaque Hematoxylin and eosin staining Von Kossa staining Hara H, et al Acute Cardiac Care 2006;8:110-2

Attenuated plaque & No-reflow Attenuated plaques are often seen in ACS Attenuated plaques are associated with no-reflow and CK-MB elevation after PCI 40% 30% P<0.001 Attenuated plaque (n=75) Non-attenuated plaque (n=218) 26.7% 20% 10% 0% No-reflow* 4.6% P=0.001 8.0% 2.8% Deteriorated flow *Post-PCI decrease from baseline in final TIMI flow grade <2 without identified mechanical obstruction Deteriorated post-pci coronary blood flow Lee SY et al J AM Coll Cardiol Inv 2009;2:65-72

VH-IVUS The overall predictive accuracies of VH were 93.5% for Fibrous, 94.1% for fibro-fatty, 95.8% for necrotic core and 96.7% for dense-calcium when used to identify different atherosclerotic plaque elements* Reproducibility of VH-IVUS analyses The presence and size of the VH-IVUS necrotic core are related to liberation of small embolic particles during coronary stenting in ACS *Nair A et al Euro Intervention 2007;3:113-20 Rodriguea-Granillo GA et al Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2006; 22: 621-31 Kawamoto T et al J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1635-40 Kawaguchi R et al J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1641-6

Hypothesis Attenuated plaques contain large amounts of necrotic core that would also explain the unstable nature of such lesions

The PROSPECT Trial 700 pts with ACS UA (with ECGΔ) or NSTEMI or STEMI >24hrs 1-22 vessel CAD undergoing PCI at up to 40 sites in U.S., Europe Metabolic S. Waist circum Fast lipids Fast glu HgbA1C Fast insulin Creatinine PCI of culprit lesion(s) Successful and uncomplicated Formally enrolled PI: Gregg W. Stone Sponsor: Abbott Vascular; Partner: Volcano Biomarkers Hs CRP IL-6 scd40l MPO TNFα MMP9 Lp-PLA2 others

3-vessel imaging post PCI Culprit artery, followed by non-culprit arteries Angiography (QCA of entire coronary tree) IVUS Virtual histology Palpography (n=~350) Proximal 6-8 cm of each coronary artery Meds rec Aspirin Plavix 1yr Statin Repeat biomarkers @ 30 days, 6 months F/U: 1 mo, 6 mo, 1 yr, 2 yr, ±3-5 5 yrs MSCT Substudy N=50-100 Repeat imaging in pts with events

Methods - I - Study Population - 124 vessels / 64 patients 111 vessels / 64 patients 13 vessels were excluded 4 had severe calcification 9 without a 40% plaque burden Grayscale analysis Attenuated plaque group maximum attenuation arc site 50 lesions / 46 vessels / 34 patients Non-attenuated plaque group MLA site 65 lesions / 65 vessels / 30 patients) VH analysis 3 vessels with attenuated plaques were excluded due to without 3 frames of matched VH images Attenuated plaque group maximum attenuation arc site 47 lesions / 43 vessels / 34 patients Non-attenuated plaque group MLA site 65 lesions / 65 vessels / 30 patients)

Methods - II Attenuated plaque - Lesion site - Maximum attenuation arc site, >40%plaque burden, Separate=if >5mm far each other Exclusion stent segment >5mm >5mm Control MLA site, >40% plaque,burden

Methods - III - IVUS-VH VH Imaging - IVUS system: phased-array, 20 MHz, catheters (Volcano) Automatic pullback at 0.5mm/sec Gray scale image=10 frame/second VH data=1 frame/beat at R-wave 4 color code Necrotic Core Fibrofatty 10 frame 10 frame 10 frame Fibrous tissue Dence Calcium VH data VH data VH data

VH-IVUS Classification Fibroatheoma: >10% confluent necrotic core VH-TCFA: 30 NC abutting to lumen VH-TCFA ThFA PIT Fibrotic Fibrocalcific >30 abutting visible fibrotic cap >15% FF >10% confluent DC >10% confluent NC <10% confluent NC

Baseline Patients Characteristics Male gender Age, yrs ACS, n (%) unstable angina NSTEMI STEMI (>24hrs) Hypertension Hypercholesterolemia Diabetes mellitus Current smoker Previous myocardial infarction (MI) Culprit lesion Left anterior descending Left circumflex Right 52 (81%) 59±12 42 (39%) 36 (23%) 30 (28%) 42 (66%) 43 (67%) 11 (17%) 29 (45%) 3 (5%) 205 (46%) 107 (24%) 132 (30%) Mean + SD or Number (percent)

Attenuated plaques identified by grayscale IVUS 47 attenuated plaque was present at 43 vessels in 34 patients 70 P=0.15 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 31 (66%) 16 (34%) 34 (52%) 31 (48%) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 20 (47%) P=0.6 23 (53%) 24 (65%) 13 (35%) 18 (56%) 14 (44%) culprit vessel non-culprit vessel LAD LCX RCA Attenuated plaque Non-attenuated plaque

Distribution of attenuated plaques 9 8 7 6 LAD LCX RCA 5 4 3 2 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 39 (83%) attenuated plaques were located within 40mm proximal to the ostium of coronary arteries: 17 (85%), 12 (92%) and 10 (71%) in LAD, LCX and RCA, respectively

Gray-Scale IVUS Findings Attenuated plaque N=47 Non-attenuated plaque N=65 P value Lesion site EEM CSA, mm 2 16.5±5.7 14.6±4.6 0.12 Lumen CSA, mm 2 7.0±3.9 5.6±1.8 0.07 P&M CSA, mm 2 9.5±3.1 9.0±3.5 0.53 Plaque burden, % 59.0±11.4 60.8±8.1 0.41 Eccentricity index 9.0±8.7 5.9±3.4 0.02 Positive remodeling, % 50.0 17.1 <0.005 Proximal reference segment EEM CSA, mm 2 16.5±5.8 15.2±5.1 0.33 Lumen CSA, mm 2 8.8±4.8 8.1±2.4 0.46 P&M CSA, mm 2 7.7±2.9 7.1±3.7 0.50 Plaque burden, % 47.9±13.8 45.2±11.8 0.39 Distal Reference Segment EEM CSA, mm 2 16.3±5.7 14.4±4.5 0.12 Lumen CSA, mm 2 8.1±3.7 7.5±2.1 0.39 P&M CSA, mm 2 8.2±2.7 6.9±3.6 0.13 Plaque burden, % 50.1±12.1 46.2±13.4 0.21

VH-IVUS imaging characteristics Attenuated plaque P&M : 9.44 mm 2 PB: 67.3% NC area: 1.96 mm 2 NC%: 20.8% Non attenuated plaque P&M : 8.8 mm 2 PB: 61.7% NC area: 0.54 mm 2 NC%: 6.1%

VH-IVUS imaging characteristics Attenuated plaque 8% Non-attenuated plaque 5% 15% 25% 52% 17% 63% 15% P<0.001 NC DC FI FF

Attenuated plaque & NC Attenuated plaque P<0.001 Non-attenuated plaque 100% Incidence (%) 75% 50% 25% 25 (39%) 17 (26%) 10 (21%) 12 (18%) 18 (38%) 11 (17%) 16 (34%) 0 3 (6%) 1 st quartile ( 0.45mm 2 ) 2 nd quartile (0.45-0.95mm 2 ) 3 rd quartile (0.95-1.5mm 2 ) 4 th quartile (>1.5mm 2 ) Necrotic core area

VH-IVUS phenotype Attenuated plaque Non-attenuated plaque 60% P<0.001 40% 20 (43%) 25 (53%) 31 (48%) 20% 19 (29%) 15 (23%) 0% 2 (4%) VH-TCFA ThCFA PIT

Conclusions Grayscale IVUS attenuated plaques are associated with a large amount of VH-IVUS necrotic core and are marker of the presence of a fibroatheroma (VH-TCFA or ThCFA). This may explain the reported biologic instability of these lesions