Family Needs Assessment

Similar documents
Overview of the National Center on Deaf-Blindness (NCDB)

These materials are Copyright NCHAM (National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management). All rights reserved. They may be reproduced

Developing an Effective IEP for Children with Deaf-Blindness: A Parent Mini-Guide

Early Identification and Referral Self-Assessment Guide

IEP MEETING CHECKLIST FOR PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DEAF-BLINDNESS

New Mexico TEAM Professional Development Module: Deaf-blindness

Open-Hands, Open Access, Deaf-Blind Intervener Learning Modules: Using A National Resource to Meet State Specific Training Needs

The Evaluation of Children with Deaf-Blindness: A Parent Mini-Guide

Chapter 3 - Deaf-Blindness

Recommended Knowledge and Skills for State Deaf-Blind Project Family Engagement Coordinators

The Pennsylvania Deaf-Blind Project

Parents and Families of Children and Youth with Deafblindness: What You Should Know

INDEPENDENT EDUCATIONAL EVALUATIONS

TExES Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (181) Test at a Glance

U.S. Department of Education Grant Performance Report (ED 524B) Project Status Chart PR/Award # (11 characters): H326T

Deaf-Blind Census. Instructions, Definitions, and Reporting Materials

READY TOOL: AGE 18 TO 21

SUPPORTING FAMILIES: AN ILLINOIS RESOURCE GUIDE FOR FAMILIES OF YOUNG CHILDREN WHO HAVE A COMBINED VISION AND HEARING LOSS

Michael Macione, AuD, & Cheryl DeConde Johnson, EdD. a critical link within the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) process.

National Deaf-Blind Equipment Distribution Program Application

WV SenseAbilities Project

Michael Macione, AuD; & Cheryl DeConde Johnson, EdD

The Evaluation of Children with Deaf-Blindness: A Parent Mini-Guide

for Students Pennsylvania Agenda or Deafblind Who Are Deaf, Hard of Hearing,

New Department of Education Guidance Issued to Ensure Access to Speech-Language Pathology Services for Children With Autism

SUBCHAPTER I. PROGRAMS FOR STUDENTS WHO ARE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING. Sec DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:

Auditorily Impaired / Visually Impaired. Memorandum of Understanding. between the Interagency Council on Early Childhood Intervention (ECI)

A PARENT S GUIDE TO DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING EARLY INTERVENTION RECOMMENDATIONS

Engage for Change local a conversation in Spartanburg, SC. September 6, 2018

Expression of Interest. Coaching and Mentoring: Auditory-Verbal Therapy

Pennsylvania Agenda for Students Who Are Deaf, Hard of Hearing, or Deafblind

Serving Illinois Families 64 Years

2018 FEDERAL POVERTY GUIDELINES

National Consortium on Deaf-Blindness 2.0

ODP Deaf Services Overview Lesson 2 (PD) (music playing) Course Number

I. Language and Communication Needs

icanconnectpa The National Deaf-Blind Equipment Distribution Program (NDBEDP) in Pennsylvania SECTION 1 OF 3: INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES

South Dakota School for the Deaf

Creating your Family Emergency Communication Plan starts with one simple question: What if?

Areas to Address with All Families

National Resources for Students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

Occupational therapy after stroke

Referrals may come from a variety of sources. They may be referrals of a child with a suspected loss, a failed screening, or a confirmed hearing

INTERVENERS IN THE HOME AND COMMUNITY: AN UNDER-RECOGNIZED IMPERATIVE HOME AND COMMUNITY INTERVENER WORKGROUP

Act Early Regional Summit February 4 th and 5 th, 2010 Seattle, Washington

Deaf-Blind Intervention: Providing Access to Education in Any Setting. Michelle Clyne Project Reach: Illinois Deaf-Blind Services

Interviewer: Tell us about the workshops you taught on Self-Determination.

Parents Guide for the identification of children

RESPONSE TO THE LANGUAGE EQUALITY AND ACQUISITION FOR DEAF KIDS (LEAD K) TASK FORCE REPORT

FY 2010 BUDGET REDUCTIONS - SUMMARY OF ISSUES COMMISSION FOR THE DEAF AND THE HARD OF HEARING ALL NON-GENERAL FUNDS

Availability of Mental Health Services for Individuals who are Deaf-Blind. Michele C. McDonnall, Ph.D. Adele Crudden, Professor, Ph.D.

Programs and services for people with vision or hearing loss

Maine s Family Centered Exploration of Communication Opportunities

Study on Family Adaptation to Fragile X Syndrome

What is the Role of the Hearing Specialist in Early Steps? Karen Anderson, PhD Coordinator of Early Intervention Services for Hearing and Vision

Manhattan Family Support Services Advisory Council Resources for Children 5/7/14 Clara Berg. New York Deaf-Blind Collaborative

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) SECOND REPORT AND ORDER AND THIRD FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

National Consortium on Deaf-Blindness 2.0

Looking to the Future of Deaf-Blind Services and the Role of Interveners: A National Webinar Co-Sponsored by NCDB and NFADB

SECTION B-3 PROVINCIAL AND DEMONSTRATION SCHOOLS IN ONTARIO

Response to the Language Equality and Acquisition for Deaf Kids (LEAD-K) Task Force Report

Accessibility. Reporting Interpretation and Accommodation Requests

A GUIDE FOR FAMILIES NEW TO AUTISM

Medical Professionals Guide. children with deafblindness. for the identification of. Systems Development & Improvement Center

Deaf-Blindness Defined

STATEWIDE COLLABORATIVE SURVEYS OF PARENTS AND TEACHERS OF YOUNG CHILDREN WHO ARE DEAF, DEAFBLIND OR HARD OF HEARING. Melinda Marsolek, MPH

State of the State Autism Early Identification and Intervention in Maryland ACT EARLY REGIONAL SUMMIT MARCH 25 TH & 26 TH 2010 PHILADELPHIA, PA

MAKING TRANSITION HAPPEN!

Low Incidence Guidelines

Introduction. Diagnosis

Learning Objectives. AT Goals. Assistive Technology for Sensory Impairments. Review Course for Assistive Technology Practitioners & Suppliers

Kansas ican Connect. Section 1: Instructions

Helen Keller National Center

We expect that once accomplished these activities will produce the following evidence of service delivery: SCREENING & IDENTIFICATION

Facilitated Discussion Notes Autism and Mental Health May 12, 2014

RIGHTS OF DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING PEOPLE IN ENTERTAINMENT

South Dakota School for the Deaf

Application for Wireless Equipment

Developmental Disabilities Conference The California Legislative Blue Ribbon Commission on Autism 03/07/2008 1

Parent Center Guide to Deafblindness: Educational Service Guidelines

Epilepsy Across the Spectrum Promoting Health and Understanding

Fiscal Year IABDB Annual Report

This report is available in alternative formats by request.

Maine s Collaborative Early Intervention Model You can do it too!

The Road Ahead. Living After Cancer Treatment

All Wales Standards for Accessible Communication and Information for People with Sensory Loss

II. EI and Audiology Sirect Service Provider Perceptions via surveys with EI providers and

Lessons Learned: Enhancing Communication between Emergency Responders and Entities Serving People

My View On Services. Karen Aguilar, MJ, Coalition Director

Creating a Program of Family-Focused Web based Resources

Emotional Health Directory refreshed

A Resilience Program Model

May 03, 2010 Rosalyn Sutley

Autism Strategies Background

9. PROVINCIAL AND DEMONSTRATION SCHOOLS IN ONTARIO

Board of Regents Informational Items

1.2. Please refer to our submission dated 27 February for further background information about NDCS.

National Stroke Association s Guide to Choosing Stroke. Rehabilitation Services

Transcription:

Family Needs Assessment Summary Report National Center on Deaf-Blindness November 2017 The contents of this publication were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education #H326T130013. However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of The Research Institute, nor the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Jo Ann McCann.

Table of Contents Part I: Background...3 How old is your child?...3 At what age did you know that your child was deaf-blind?...3 At what age was your child when you were referred to a state deaf-blind project?...3 Who referred you to your state deaf-blind project?...4 Part II: Child and Family Needs and Strengths...5 What are the current top 3 needs you have for your child?...5 What do you most need information about?...5 What are your greatest strengths as a family in addressing the needs of your child? What are you most successful at?...6 Part III: Experiences with Agencies and Service Providers...8 What agencies has your child received services from? How was your experience?...8 What service providers both public and private have worked with or are currently working with your child?...10 Part IV. Experiences and Interactions with Other Families...12 How many times per month, on average, do you have an opportunity to communicate with another family member of a person who is deaf-blind (in person or by phone or via distance technology)? 12 How do you like to communicate with other families?...12 Is there a group for parents of children who are deaf-blind in your state? If so, are you a member of that group? Are you presently involved in advocacy at the state or national level to improve services for children who are deaf-blind?...12 Part V. Supports for Families...14 What helps you make decisions about your child's education, health, and developmental needs?.14 What supports have been most helpful from other families?...14 What supports from your state deaf-blind project have been most helpful?...15 How do you like to receive information?...15 Do you have additional comments you would like to share?...16 Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 2

Part I: Background In 2017, NCDB, with input from state deaf-blind projects, the National Family Association for Deaf-Blind (NFADB), and the CHARGE Syndrome Foundation, conducted a national survey to collect information about the needs of families of children with deaf-blindness. The results can be used by NCDB, state deaf-blind projects, and family and community organizations to better serve families of children who are deaf-blind. Families were recruited by a variety of agencies/organizations, including: NCDB State Deaf-Blind Projects NFADB Charge Syndrome Foundation Online and print versions of the survey were available in both English and Spanish. A total of 184 individuals responded to one or more questions. This section provides a summary of their answers to background questions about their child including age, age at diagnosis, and when and by whom they were referred to their state deaf-blind project. How old is your child? 184 individuals responded. Age ranged from less than one to sixty-one years of age (average 12 years, 3 months). The majority (91%) were aged birth to 21. Age Number Birth to 2 9 Preschool (3 to 5) 38 Elementary School (6 to 11) 54 Middle/High School (12 to 17) 42 Young Adult (18 to 21) 25 22 to 30 10 Over 30 7 At what age did you know that your child was deaf-blind? 182 individuals responded. A significant majority of their children were diagnosed before age three (74%). At what age was your child when you were referred to a state deaf-blind project? 132 individuals responded. Age of referral varied significantly, but typically occurred sometime after an initial diagnosis. For example, while 74% were diagnosed before age three, only 38% had been referred by age three. Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 3

Age at Time of Referral Number At birth 54 Before age 1 34 1 to 2 years old 47 3 to 5 years old 29 6 to 10 years old 15 Older than 10 2 Not sure 1 Who referred you to your state deaf-blind project? 63 individuals responded. They recalled a wide range of people and programs that provided referrals. Part C personnel were the most common, followed by school personnel. 1. Part C provider (22%) 2. School personnel (19%) 3. State deaf-blind project contacted me (13%) 4. Hospital/medical professional (11%) 5. Another parent or friend (10%) 6. I sought them out (self-referral) (8%) 7. Social worker or other program or agency (6%) 8. Don t remember (11%) Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 4

Part II: Child and Family Needs and Strengths Part II focuses on the needs of children and the needs and strengths of their families. What are the current top 3 needs you have for your child? 180 individuals responded. They identified 485 critical needs. The 485 need statements were sorted into 33 specific categories, with the 10 most frequent being: 1. Communication system 2. Qualified knowledgeable personnel at local level 3. Social engagement 4. Health 5. Independent living and functional living skills 6. Supports in the home and community 7. Parent training 8. Technology use 9. Transition 10. Vision supports What do you most need information about? 154 individuals responded. They identified many information needs, including (in order of frequency): 1. Assistive technology 2. Communication methods and instruction 3. Advocacy skills to support child in school and community 4. Impact of vision and hearing loss 5. Helping child build social skills and friendships 6. Building a network of support for child 7. Transition to adult life 8. Supporting child with complex medical needs 9. Interveners in school Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 5

10. Dealing with challenging behaviors 11. What child s life will be like in adulthood 12. Dealing with IEPs and assessments 13. Movement 14. Employment 15. Sibling support 16. Transition from early intervention to school What are your greatest strengths as a family in addressing the needs of your child? What are you most successful at? Self-identified family strengths from the 124 individuals who responded to this question fell into three broad categories: 1) Family Characteristics and Dynamics (reported by 123 respondents); 2) Skills and Abilities (102 respondents); and 3) Development of External Supports (reported by 12 respondents). Family Characteristics and Dynamics Family is a strong team Adaptability, determination, and patience Love, humor, and faith Knowing and understanding our child Being consistent Allowing child freedom to explore Focusing on strengths and maintaining high expectations Including child in all family activities Celebrating successes Skills and Abilities Taking care of educational and medical needs Ability to advocate for our child Ability to find resources Ability to communicate with our child Ability to teach specific skills (applies to parents who are also experienced educators) Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 6

Ability (financial) to provide support Development of External Supports Connections with other families Having external supports Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 7

Part III: Experiences with Agencies and Service Providers This section summarizes responses regarding experiences with the various agencies and service providers that provide services for their children. What agencies has your child received services from? How was your experience? 166 individuals responded. Almost all reported working with school districts and/or a department of education (93%). Of these, approximately 70% reported having had positive experiences. Considerably fewer (58%) reported on their interactions with Part C agencies. Of these, approximately 75% reported that their experiences were positive. Fewer respondents reported having had interactions with state developmental disabilities and/or vocational rehabilitation programs. Less than half (40%), reported that these experiences were positive. Frequency and satisfaction of experiences with state and local programs Service/Program Our child has received services from Positive Experience Negative Experience Neutral this agency School District 154 106 26 22 (69%) (17%) (14%) Part C (Infant and 97 73 7 17 Toddler Services) (75%) (7%) (18%) Developmental 84 35 15 34 Disabilities (42%) 18%) (40%) Vocational 48 18 9 21 Rehabilitation (38%) (19%) (43%) Other programs included the medical system, public health agencies, state parent training and information centers (PTIs), Helen Keller National Center Regional Representatives, and an openended other category. Most families reported interactions with the medical system (78%). Of these, almost 80% of reported positive experiences. Far fewer reported interactions with their public health system (36%). Fewer than half reported positive experiences (47%). Fewer still (28%) reported receiving services from a Hellen Keller Regional Representative or their state PTI (23%). While only about half of the individuals reported positive experiences with these programs, few reported negative experiences. Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 8

Frequency and satisfaction of experiences with the medical system and other programs Service/Program Our child has received services from Positive Experience Negative Experience Neutral this agency Medical System 130 102 8 20 (78%) (6%) (16%) Public Health 60 28 10 22 (47%) (17%) (36%) Helen Keller 46 24 5 17 Regional (52%) (11%) (37%) Representative Parent Center 38 16 6 16 (42%) (16%) (42%) Other 43 41 1 1 (95%) (2%) (2%) 43 respondents mentioned additional local, state, and national agencies and programs from which they had received satisfactory services, including: Deaf-blind specific agencies and organizations Blindness/visual impairment agencies and organizations Other agencies and organizations Deaf-Blindness State Deaf-Blind Projects CHARGE Syndrome Foundation Deaf-Blind Association Deaf-Blind Services Blindness/Visual Impairment Children s center for visually impaired Junior Blind of America Low vision clinic National Federation of the Blind Commission for Blind Idaho School of Blind Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 9

Lighthouse Anchor Center Other Parks & Recreation Boise state FUSE project (adaptive equipment) Easter Seals Rehabilitation Center Family to Family Health Information Center What service providers both public and private have worked with or are currently working with your child? 162 individuals responded to this question about education, medical, and social service providers. The question asked about both public and private service providers. They are combined here to demonstrate the range of service providers who work with, or have worked with, their child. At least three quarters of respondents indicated that their child had worked with or was working with a speech language pathologist, special education teacher, occupational therapist, physical therapist, or teacher of the visually impaired. More than half reported working with early intervention teachers, regular education teachers, teachers of the deaf or hard of hearing, school nurses, orientation and mobility instructors, paraeducators, and school administrators. Only about one in four reported working with an intervener, teacher of the deaf-blind or an interpreter. Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 10

Educational personnel who have or currently work with child Education Personnel Frequency Speech Language Pathologist 150 Special Education Teacher 143 Occupational Therapist 141 Physical Therapist 138 Teacher of the Visually Impaired 126 Early Intervention Teacher 120 Regular Education Teacher 106 Teacher of the Deaf or Hard of Hearing 105 School Nurse 104 Administrator (School or District) 96 Orientation & Mobility Instructor 94 Paraeducator 84 Intervener 46 Teacher of the Deaf-Blind 37 Interpreter 33 Medical or social service personnel who have or currently work with child Medical/Social Service Personnel Frequency Ophthalmologist 150 Audiologist 148 Pediatrician 145 Physician 141 Optometrist 110 Social Worker 68 Public Health Nurse 31 Other 43 Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 11

Part IV. Experiences and Interactions with Other Families Part IV focuses on experiences and interactions with family groups and other families. Family members were asked about the frequency with which they interacted with other families, their preferred means of communication, and their participation in state/local family groups as well as state and national advocacy activities. How many times per month, on average, do you have an opportunity to communicate with another family member of a person who is deaf-blind (in person or by phone or via distance technology)? A total of 149 individuals responded to the question regarding frequency of interactions with other families. 74 (49.7%) reported they never communicate with other families 53 (35.6%) reported communicating 1 to 2 times per month 5 (3.4%) reported communicating 3 to 5 times per month 17 (11.4%) reported communicating more than 5 times per month How do you like to communicate with other families? A total of 152 individuals responded to the question about their preferred means of interacting with other families. Respondents could select more than one answer. 112 (73.7%) identified in-person interactions as a preferred means of communication 90 (59.2%) identified interacting within private Facebook groups as a preferred means of communication 69 (45.4%) identified talking on the phone as a preferred means of communication 69 (45.4%) identified texting as a preferred means of communication (very few preferred email). 25% identified some form of online communication (e.g., Skype, FaceTime, Google Chat, etc.) as a preferred means of communication Several respondents were not interested in communicating with other families Is there a group for parents of children who are deaf-blind in your state? If so, are you a member of that group? Are you presently involved in advocacy at the state or national level to improve services for children who are deaf-blind? A total of 132 individuals responded to the open-ended question about their participation in state parent groups and state and national advocacy efforts. 69 (52.3%) indicated there was a parent group in their state Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 12

o 40 (30.3%) of the 69 indicated they were active in the group 28 (21.2%) indicated that there wasn t a parent group in their state 46 (34.8%) did not know or did not respond 13 (9.8%) indicated that they were active in state and/or national advocacy efforts Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 13

Part V. Supports for Families Part V focuses on family supports at local, state, and national levels. Family members were asked a series of questions related to who they relied on for decision-making advice, supports they found most helpful, support they received from state deaf-blind projects, and on how they like to receive information. What helps you make decisions about your child's education, health, and developmental needs? A total of 156 individuals responded to this question. They were asked to rank the following resources from most to least helpful: my own expertise and knowledge of my child; state deafblind project; reading and self-study; watching online videos; attending trainings/workshops; expert advice (e.g., Part C providers, teachers, physicians); advice from a parent of a child who is deaf-blind; information from a local or national parent group; other. Responses were grouped into three categories: themselves, experts, and members of other families. Overall, parents relied most on their own knowledge about their child and knowledge gained through self-study. The numbers in parentheses reflect the combined rankings for all respondents. 1. Themselves 2. Experts Their own knowledge of their child (1) Reading and self-study (3) Watching online videos (8) Service providers (e.g., Part C providers, teachers, physicians) (2) State deaf-blind project personnel (5) Trainings and workshops (4) 3. Other Families Parent of a child who is deaf-blind (6) Local or national parent group (7) What supports have been most helpful from other families? Respondents were asked to identify who provided the most support to their family and the nature of that support. A total of 112 individuals responded to these open-ended questions. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of respondents identifying that source of support. Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 14

1. Other families (41) 2. State deaf-blind project (37) 3. CHARGE Syndrome Foundation (27) 4. NFADB (10) 5. HKNC (3) 6. Usher Syndrome Foundation (2) 7. Have not received supports (9) 8. Other (22) Respondents identified the specific types of supports that were most helpful, regardless of source. These are listed below in order of frequency, with connections to other families being identified most often. 1. Connections to other families 2. Conferences and parent weekends 3. Facebook groups 4. Resources/information used in home, community, school 5. One-on-one assistance, technical assistance, and training related to child s education 6. Support in obtaining services in school and the community What supports from your state deaf-blind project have been most helpful? A total of 102 individuals responded to the question about the most helpful supports from state deaf-blind projects. These are listed below in order of frequency. 1. Parent workshops/weekends (45%) 2. One-on-one support (26%) 3. Access to resources and information (25%) 4. Technical assistance to school teams (23%) How do you like to receive information? A total of 155 individuals responded to the question regarding how they best like to receive information. Respondents were asked to rank from most to least favorite the ways in which they like to receive information. Responses are presented in overall order of preference based on these rankings. The numbers in parentheses refer to the number of individuals who ranked the item as the most desirable method. Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 15

1. In-person training (60) 2. Website (37) 3. Online training (12) 4. Online self-study (with support) (7) 5. Family stories (examples from families) (17) 6. Mentoring from another family member (3) 7. Online self-study (without support) (3) 8. Social media (7) Do you have additional comments you would like to share? Forty individuals provided additional comments. These have been summarized into six categories and are listed below in order of frequency: 1. Need more support groups for parents to connect and share thoughts, experiences, and feelings (13) 2. Need help navigating state programs and agencies, especially adult/community services and programs (6) 3. Need qualified personnel in our state interveners and teachers (4) 4. Need more support from national organizations and projects (4) 5. Resources need to be easier to find (5) 6. Thank you for your supports/activities (8) Family Needs Assessment: Summary Report, NCDB (2017) 16