Study No.: SFCA3007 Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the DISKUS

Similar documents
Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): Statistical Methods:

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: SAM40012 Title: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group comparison of three treatments : 1)

UMEC/VI vs. UMEC in subjects who responded to UMEC UMEC/VI vs. VI in subjects who responded to VI

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Co-Primary Outcomes/Efficacy Variables:

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

SYNOPSIS THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives : Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Blood Eosinophils and Response to Maintenance COPD Treatment: Data from the FLAME Trial. Online Data Supplement

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The population of subjects which was statistically analyzed was the Intent-to-Treat population

TORCH: Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate and Survival in COPD

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Dual-controller therapy, or combinations REVIEW DUAL-CONTROLLER REGIMENS I: DATA FROM RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Dual-Controller Asthma Therapy: Rationale and Clinical Benefits

SUMMARY THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

Step-down approach in chronic stable asthma: A comparison of reducing dose Inhaled Formoterol/ Budesonide with maintaining Inhaled Budesonide.

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

SYNOPSIS. Date 15 June 2004

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

The beneficial effects of ICS in COPD

Evidence Summary to support COPD formulary decision making and guideline development

James P. Kemp, MD; Margaret C. Minkwitz, PhD; Catherine M. Bonuccelli, MD; and Marshelle S. Warren, MD

DATE: 09 December 2009 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES:

ABC/3TC/ZDV ABC PBO/3TC/ZDV

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective:

Drug Class Review on Beta 2 -Agonists

SYNOPSIS. Drug substance(s) Budesonide/formoterol Document No. Edition No. Study code SD Date 16 December 2004

Evidence Summary to support COPD formulary decision making and guideline development

Draft Guidance on Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol Xinafoate. Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol Xinafoate. Powder/Inhalation

SYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers).

This is a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: What s New in Therapeutic Management?

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

International co-ordinating investigator Dr Dencho Osmanliev, St Sofia, Pulmonary Dept, 19 D Nestorov Str, Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria.

Disease progression in COPD:

Test Your Inhaler Knowledge

Study No.: LOV Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary-

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

SYNOPSIS A two-stage randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase III, multicenter, 7-month study to assess the efficacy and safety of SYMBICORT

INSPIRE: A Phase 3 Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of LIQ861 in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)

SYNOPSIS. Study centres This was a multicentre study conducted in 53 centres in Sweden.

Not available 100/6mcg 2 BD formoterol (Fostair MDI) 100/6mcg 33

Efficacy Study of Zoledronic Acid and Teriparatide Combination Therapy in Women With Osteoporosis

Aerospan (flunisolide)

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Who can get most benefit

Up in FLAMES: Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Management. Colleen Sakon, PharmD BCPS September 27, 2018

Primary Care Medicine: Concepts and Controversies Wed., February 17, 2010 Fiesta Americana Puerto Vallarta, Mexico Update on Asthma and COPD

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 15 December 2010

C.S. HAWORTH 1, A. WANNER 2, J. FROEHLICH 3, T. O'NEAL 3, A. DAVIS 4, I. GONDA 3, A. O'DONNELL 5

umeclidinium, 55 micrograms, powder for inhalation (Incruse ) SMC No. (1004/14) GlaxoSmithKline

International Co-ordinating investigator None appointed.

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Demonstrating Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Orally Inhaled Drug Products

THE CHALLENGES OF COPD MANAGEMENT IN PRIMARY CARE An Expert Roundtable

SYNOPSIS. Co-ordinating investigator Not applicable. Study centre(s) This study was conducted in Japan (57 centres).

Decramer 2014 a &b [21]

Choosing an inhaler for COPD made simple. Dr Simon Hart Castle Hill Hospital

Supplementary Appendix

Aclidinium bromide/formoterol Endpoint category. RR Endpoint. [95% CI 2 ] Study. with event

รศ. นพ. ว ชรา บ ญสว สด M.D., Ph.D. ภาคว ชาอาย รศาสตร คณะแพทยศาสตร มหาว ทยาล ยขอนแก น

Asthma in Pregnancy. Asthma. Chronic Airway Inflammation. Objective Measures of Airflow. Peak exp. flow rate (PEFR)

Study No: Title: Rationale: . Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline Management of COPD Pocket Guide

At-A-Glance Outpatient Management Reference for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

SYNOPSIS. First subject enrolled 15 August 2003 Therapeutic confirmatory (III) Last subject completed 03 February 2005

The TORCH (TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health) survival study protocol

SHORT COMMUNICATION. Abstract. Kevin R. Murphy, 1 Tom Uryniak, 2 Ubaldo J. Martin 2 and James Zangrilli 2

Journal of the COPD Foundation. Journal Club. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases:

Sponsor Novartis Pharmaceuticals

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Comparing COPD Treatment: Nebulizer, Metered Dose Inhaler, and Concomitant Therapy

What s new in COPD? Apichart Khanichap MD. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat university

Asthma ASTHMA. Current Strategies for Asthma and COPD

Type of intervention Treatment. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Abstract Background Theophylline is widely used in the treatment of asthma, and there is evidence that theophylline has antiinflammatory

Pharmacological Management of Obstructive Airways in Humans. Introduction to Scientific Research. Submitted: 12/4/08

Treatment Responses. Ronald Dahl, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Transcription:

Study No.: A3007 Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, -Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the DISKUS Formulations of Salmeterol (SAL) 50mcg BID and Fluticasone Propionate (FP) 250mcg BID Individually and in Combination as Salmeterol 50mcg/Fluticasone Propionate 250mcg BID ( ) Compared to in COPD Subjects Rationale: To compare the efficacy and safety of SAL,FP and placebo individually and in combination when administered as a micronized powder via a multidose powder inhaler (DISKUS) to subjects with COPD over 24 weeks Phase: III Study Period: 10 November 1998 28 August 2000 Study Design: A Randomized, Double-Blind, -Controlled, Parallel-Group, 24-Week Clinical Trial Centres: 75 centers in the U.S.A., one in Puerto Rico Indication: COPD Treatment: # Denotes treatment approved in the US and at least one country in the European Union. During the 2-week, single-blind, Run-In Period, subjects received placebo via the DISKUS BID and prn albuterol Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) or nebules, to establish a Baseline. Subjects who completed the Run-In Period were assigned to one of four double-blind treatments via the DISKUS for 24 weeks: mcg BID#, mcg BID, mcg BID#, or BID. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of,,, and placebo when administered via the DISKUS over a 24-week treatment period in the treatment of COPD subjects. To compare quality of life in COPD subjects receiving the aforementioned treatments. Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The primary analysis was the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment excluding Discontinuation) analysis comparing the mean change from Baseline in AM pre-dose and 2-hr post-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) among treatment groups. Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): Chronic Bronchitis Symptoms Questionnaire (CBSQ); Baseline/Transition Dyspnea Index (BDI/TDI); Exacerbations of COPD; Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRDQ); Evaluation of subject diary cards: morning (AM) peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), supplemental albuterol (MDI or nebules) use; Night-time awakenings requiring the use of albuterol. Statistical Methods: Enrollment was planned for 720 subjects (180 per treatment group). Using a two sample t-test and a significance level of 0.05, a sample size of 180 subjects per treatment would provide >90% power to detect a difference of 0.1 liter for any pairwise treatment comparisons. The primary analysis was that performed on data from Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment excluding Discontinuation) comparing the mean change from Baseline in AM pre-dose and 2-hour post dose FEV1 among treatment groups. Analyses based on the intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken at least one dose of double-blind study drug. Study Population: Males and females 40 years of age with a diagnosis of COPD. Subjects must have had a current or prior history of 20-pack years of cigarette smoking and a history of cough productive of sputum on most days for at least 3 months of the year, for at least 2 years, that was not attributable to another disease process. Subjects were also required to have a FEV1/FVC ratio of 70% at Screening and a baseline FEV1 of <65% of predicted normal but >0.70L or FEV1 1

0.70L and >40% but still <65% of predicted normal. Number of Subjects: Planned, N 180 180 180 180 Randomised, N 185 177 183 178 Completed, 126 (68) 121 (68) 133 (73) 125 (70) Withdrawn, 59 (32) 56 (32) 50 (27) 53 (30) Demographics N (ITT) 185 177 183 178 Females: Males 59:126 75:102 62:121 70:108 Mean Age, years (SD) 64.8 (8.7) 64.2 (9.8) 63.3 (9.4) 63.4 (10.6) White, 173 (94) 165 (93) 167 (91) 170 (96) Primary Efficacy Results: Pre-Dose FEV1 (ITT) Mean Pre-Dose FEV1 at Baseline (ml) 1232 1205 1236 1207 Mean Change in Pre-Dose FEV1 at Endpoint (ml) 1 91a 109a 165a,b p-values: a differs from placebo p 0.005; b differs from SAL p=0.012; c differs from FP p=0.009 2-hr Post-Dose FEV1 (ITT) Mean 2-hr Post-Dose FEV1 at Baseline(mL) 1232 1205 1236 1207 Mean Change in 2-hr Post-Dose FEV1 at Endpoint (ml) 58 200a 147a 281a,b,c p-values: a differs from placebo p 0.007; b differs from SAL p=0.010; c differs from FP p 0.003 Secondary Outcome Variable(s): Summary of Mean Change from Baseline in CBSQ Global Assessment Scores (GAS) (ITT) Mean CBSQ GAS at Baseline 7.5 7.0 7.4 7.3 Mean Change in CBSQ GAS at Endpoint 1.4 1.5 2.2 2.1 Summary of Baseline/Transition Dyspnea Index- Total Score (BDI/TDI) (ITT) Mean BDI Score at Baseline 5.7 6.1 6.2 6.1 Mean TDI Score at Endpoint 1.0 1.6 1.7 1.7 Incidence of COPD Exacerbations (ITT) COPD Exacerbation of Any Severity, None 112 (61) 112 (63) 104 (57) 107 (60) 1 73 (39) 65 (37) 79 (43) 71 (40) 1 49 (26) 42 (24) 50 (27) 45 (25) 2 10 (5) 14 (8) 17 (9) 12 (7) 3 3 (2) 2 (1) 3 (2) 6 (3) 4 11 (6) 7 (4) 9 (5) 8 (4) 2

Moderate/Severe COPD Exacerbation, None 122 (66) 122 (69) 114 (62) 117 (66) 1 63 (34) 55 (31) 69 (38) 61 (34) 1 49 (26) 45 (25) 54 (30) 50 (28) 2 11 (6) 9 (5) 15 (8) 10 (6) 3 2 (1) 1 (<1) 0 1 (<1) 4 1 (<1) 0 0 0 Summary of Mean Change from Baseline in Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire Scores (CRDQ) (ITT) Mean CRDQ Score at Baseline 84.8 86.3 85.5 84.1 Mean Change in CRDQ Score at Endpoint 5.0 6.4 10.4 10 AM PEFR (L/min) (ITT) Mean AM PEFR at Baseline 220.3 210.3 220.0 206.1 Mean Overall Change from Baseline in AM PEFR 0.8 14.7 11.3 30.6 Supplemental Albuterol Use (ITT) - Number of Puffs of Albuterol Used per Day FP250 Mean at Baseline, no. of puffs 4.8 4.6 4.6 5.1 Mean Overall Change from Baseline, no. of puffs 0.1-0.7-0.2-1.0 Supplemental Albuterol Use (ITT) - Percent of Days Without Albuterol Use Mean at Baseline, % of Days 24.8 25.2 24.7 24.4 Mean Overall Change from Baseline, % of Days 4.0 5.8 5.0 10.0 Night-time Awakenings Requiring Albuterol (ITT) Number of Awakenings/Night Requiring Albuterol Mean at Baseline, no. of awakenings 0.23 0.20 0.24 0.24 Mean Overall Change from Baseline, no. of 0.02-0.06-0.03-0.12 awakenings Night-time Awakenings Requiring Albuterol (ITT) % of Nights with No Awakenings Requiring Albuterol Mean at Baseline, % of Nights 83.2 84.7 84.9 82.7 Mean Overall Change from Baseline, % of Nights 0.3 5.1 4.8 8.3 Safety Results: On-therapy adverse events and serious adverse events included all events with onset dates on or after treatment start date and on or before treatment stop date + 1 day. Most Frequent Adverse Events On- Therapy Subjects with any AE(s), 118 (64) 114 (64) 129 (70) 124 (70) 3

Headaches 22 (12) 17 (10) 21 (11) 28 (16) URTI 26 (14) 16 (9) 18 (10) 22 (12) Candidiasis mouth/throat 2 (1) 5 (3) 11 (6) 17 (10) Musculoskeletal pain 16 (9) 21 (12) 14 (8) 16 (9) Throat irritation 13 (7) 7 (4) 10 (5) 15 (8) Sinusitis 5 (3) 8 (5) 14 (8) 6 (3) Serious Adverse Events On-Therapy N (%) [n considered by the investigator to be related to study medication] Subjects with non-fatal SAEs, 11 (6) 5 (3) 10 (5) 8 (4) COPD 1 (<1) [0] 2 (1) [0] 3 (2) [0] 0 Pneumonia 0 1 (<1) [0] 1 (<1) [0] 0 Pleura disorders 0 0 0 1 (<1) [0] Arrhythmias 0 0 0 1 (<1) [1] Cerebrovascular accidents 0 1 (<1) [0] 0 0 Coronary artery disorders 1 (<1) [0] 0 0 0 Disturbances of intracranial blood flow 0 1 (<1) [0] 0 0 Myocardial infarction 0 0 1 (<1) [0] 0 Cholelithiasis 1 (<1) [0] 0 2 (1) [0] 0 Cholecystitis 0 0 1 (<1) [0] 1 (<1) [0] Cholangitits 0 0 1 (<1) [0] 0 Pancreatitis 0 0 1 (<1) [0] 0 Chest symptoms 2 (1) [0] 0 0 1 (<1) [0] Bacterial infections 0 0 0 1 (<1) [0] Primary malignant blood & lymphatic 0 0 0 1 (<1) [0] neoplasia Spleen disorders 0 0 1 (<1) [0] 0 Fractures 1 (<1) [0] 0 0 1 (<1) [0] Contusions & hematomas 1 (<1) [0] 0 0 0 Epistaxis 1 (<1) [0] 0 0 0 Pharyngitis/ throat infection 0 0 0 1 (<1) [0] Primary malignant breast neoplasia 1 (<1) [0] 0 0 0 Hypoglycemia 0 0 1 (<1) [0] 0 Appendicitis 1 (<1) [0] 0 0 0 Muscle atrophy weakness & tiredness 0 1 (<1) [0] 0 0 Depressive disorders 1 (<1) [0] 0 0 0 Primary malignant skin neoplasia 0 0 0 1 (<1) [0] Subjects with fatal SAEs, 0 0 0 0 Conclusions: See publications below. Date Updated: 21-Sep-2004 4

Publications Hanania N, Darken P, Horstman D, et al.the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (250mcg)/salmeterol (50mcg) combined in the Diskus inhaler for the treatment of COPD. Chest 2003; 124:834-841. Hanania NA, Ramsdell J, Payne K, et al. Improvements in airflow and dyspnea in COPD patients following 24-weeks treatment with salmeterol 50mcg and fluticasone propionate 250mcg alone or in combination via the Diskus. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163(Suppl 5):A279 The bronchodilator response to salmeterol is maintained with regular, long-term use in patients with copd. Hanania, N. A., Kalberg, C., Yates, J., Emmett, A., Horstman, D., and Knobil, K. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2005; 18(1):19-22 Abstract: Improvements in airflow and dyspnea in copd patients following 24 weeks treatment with salmeterol 50 mug fluticasone propionate 250mug alone or in combination via the diskus. Hanania, N A, Ramsdell, J, Ramsdell, J, Payne, K, Davis, S, Horstman, D, Lee, B, and Darken, P American Lung Association/American Thoracic Society 97th International Conference 5/18/2001 San Francisco, California Abstract: Rapid onset of improvement in airflow with combination salmeterol and fluticasone propionate therapy administered by a single diskus in patients with copd. Hanania, N A, Knobil, K, Watkins, M, Wire, P, Yates, J, and Darken, P. 68th Annual International Scientific Assembly and the Clinical World Congress on Diseases of the Chest 11/2/2002 68th Annual International Scientific Assembly and the Clinical World Congress on Diseases of the Chest San Diego, CA 5