B Kahl 1, M Hamadani 2, P Caimi 3, E Reid 4, K Havenith 5, S He 6, JM Feingold 6, O O Connor 7

Similar documents
New Evidence reports on presentations given at EHA/ICML Bendamustine in the Treatment of Lymphoproliferative Disorders

POST ICML Indolent lymphomas relapse treatment

*Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland

Update: New Treatment Modalities

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in Hodgkin and non-hodgkin Lymphoma: How do they work? Where will we use them? Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic

Disclosures WOJCIECH JURCZAK

2018 KSMO Immune Oncology Forum. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in hematologic. malignancies: evidences and perspectives 서울아산병원종양내과 홍정용

Pharmacyclics Reports Updated Clinical Results from its Phase IA Trial of its First in Human BTK- Inhibitor PCI-32765

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Participating Institutions Insitut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France Institut Bergonie, Bourdeaux, France. Sponsor Epizyme, Inc

NASDAQ: TGTX. 33 rd Annual JP Morgan Healthcare Conference

State of the art: CAR-T cell therapy in lymphoma

Bendamustine is Effective Therapy in Patients with Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

New Targets and Treatments for Follicular Lymphoma

7 Recruiting Carfilzomib, Rituximab and Dexamethasone in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia Condition: Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

NASDAQ: TGTX Jefferies Healthcare Conference June 2015

Rituxan Hycela (rituximab and hyaluronidase human) (Subcutaneous)

eastern cooperative oncology group Michael Williams, Fangxin Hong, Brad Kahl, Randy Gascoyne, Lynne Wagner, John Krauss, Sandra Horning

MMAE disrupts cell division and triggers apoptosis. Pola binds to cell surface antigen CD79b. Pola is internalized; linker cleaves, releasing MMAE

Duvelisib (IPI-145), a PI3K-δ,γ Inhibitor, is Clinically Active in Patients with Relapsed/ Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Bendamustine, Bortezomib and Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Indolent and Mantle-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Constan'ne S Tam Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Center Melbourne, Australia

BESPONSA (inotuzumab ozogamicin)

Rituximab, and autologous stem cell collection rate after induction therapy with Bortezomib-Rituximab. 4 Not yet recruiting

Idelalisib in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; 2. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; 3

Understanding your diagnosis. Dr Graham Collins Consultant Haemtologist Oxford University Hospitals

BR is an established treatment regimen for CLL in the front-line and R/R settings

University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; 8 Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 9

Building a Leading Oncology Franchise

Imbruvica. Imbruvica (ibrutinib) Description

Biogen Idec Oncology Pipeline. Greg Reyes, MD, PhD SVP, Oncology Research & Development

CARE at ASH 2014 Lymphoma. Dr. Diego Villa Medical Oncologist British Columbia Cancer Agency Vancouver Cancer Centre

Mathias J Rummel, MD, PhD

Study Rationale. Reference: Chanan-Khan, A., et al., ASH 2010, Abstract#1962. Reference: Whiteman, K., et al, AACR, 2009, Abstract#2799

Kamakshi V Rao, PharmD, BCOP, FASHP University of North Carolina Medical Center UPDATE IN REFRACTORY HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

PET-imaging: when can it be used to direct lymphoma treatment?

REWRITING CANCER TREATMENT THROUGH EPIGENETIC MEDICINES

Enasidenib Monotherapy is Effective and Well-Tolerated in Patients with Previously Untreated Mutant-IDH2 Acute Myeloid Leukemia

DYNAMO: A PHASE 2 STUDY OF DUVELISIB IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY INDOLENT NON HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

TARGETING EZH2 WITH TAZEMETOSTAT IN FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA

A Phase 1 Study of Tazemetostat (EPZ-6438), an Enhancer of Zeste-Homolog 2 (EZH2) Inhibitor: Preliminary Activity in INI1-Negative Tumors

ASH POSTER: LYMRIT UPDATE

TarGeting B-Cell Diseases

Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form NAME :James O. Armitage, M.D AFFILIATION: University of Nebraska Medical Center

Managing patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. Case

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

DCC-2618, a novel pan-kit and PDGFR

International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (ICML) June 14-17, 2017

Imbruvica. Imbruvica (ibrutinib) Description

METRIC Study Key Eligibility Criteria

Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer. Aurelio B. Castrellon Medical Oncology Memorial Healthcare System

Clinical Study Synopsis

Kymriah. Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) Description

R/R DLBCL Treatment Landscape

Study No Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

Product: Blinatumomab (AMG 103) Clinical Study Report: MT Date: 19 April 2013 Page 2 of 9510

Notification to Implement Issued by pcodr: December 14, 2012

ICML BETALUTIN LYMRIT STUDY UPDATE JUNE 14 TH, 2017

Change Summary - Form 2018 (R3) 1 of 12

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Betalutin, a novel CD37-targeted radioimmunotherapy for NHL. Arne Kolstad Oslo University Hospital 2 October 2018

Corporate Presentation June Curis, Inc All Rights Reserved

Chimeric An+gen Receptor (CAR) Modified T Cell Therapy: Mee#ng the Unmet Need in Follicular Lymphoma

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 18 July 2012

Idelalisib treatment is associated with improved cytopenias in patients with relapsed/refractory inhl and CLL

CLINICAL MEDICAL POLICY

Building a Fully Integrated Biopharmaceutical Company. June 2014

What is the best approach to the initial therapy of PTCL? standards of treatment? Should all

Methotrexate-associated Lymphoproliferative Disorders

88-year-old Female with Lymphadenopathy. Faizi Ali, MD

Update: Non-Hodgkin s Lymphoma

CAR-T CELLS: NEW HOPE FOR CANCER PATIENTS

LYMPHOMA Joginder Singh, MD Medical Oncologist, Mercy Cancer Center

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 8 November 2006

Rituxan Hycela. Rituxan Hycela (rituximab and hyaluronidase human) Description

A Phase 1 Trial of Lenalidomide (REVLIMID ) With Bortezomib (VELCADE ) in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

1. Please review the following table, make any changes you think are necessary and highlight those changes. Feel free to put notes on the next page

Tumor Antigens in the Age of Engineered T cell Therapies

Corporate Presentation

Durable Responses Observed in Recurrent High Grade Glioma (rhgg) with Toca 511 & Toca FC Treatment

CAR T-Cell Therapy for Lymphoma: Assessing Long-Term Durability. Julie M. Vose, MD, MBA

Janssen Hematologic Malignancy Portfolio

Chimeric Antigen Receptor - CAR T cell therapy. Frederick L. Locke, MD 2/17/2017

Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Dosimetric Dose: 450 mg of TST infused over 70 minutes (inclusive of a 10-minute flush) immediately followed by 35

Investor Update. Downloads. Services PDF. Basel, 23 June 2017

Strategies for the Treatment of Elderly DLBCL Patients, New Combination Therapy in NHL, and Maintenance Rituximab Therapy in FL

Pinkal Desai MD MPH Weill Cornell Medical College New York, NY WHI Annual Meeting, May 5-6, 2016

Targeting CD20 and CD22 in B-cell ALL Daniel J. DeAngelo, MD, PhD

This was a multicenter study conducted at 11 sites in the United States and 11 sites in Europe.

Summary of Changes Page BMT CTN 1205 Protocol Amendment #4 (Version 5.0) Dated July 22, 2016

CAR-T cell therapy pros and cons

WHO Classification. B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small T-cell granular lymphocytic leukemia

Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 3

Checkpoint Blockade in Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation

Corporate Medical Policy

Digital Washington University School of Medicine. Russell Schilder Fox Chase Comprehensive Cancer Center. Arturo Molina Biogen Idec

Lymphoma/CLL 101: Know your Subtype. Dr. David Macdonald Hematologist, The Ottawa Hospital

Transcription:

First Clinical Results of ADCT-42, a Novel Pyrrolobenzodiazepine-Based Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC), in Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Lineage Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma B Kahl 1, M Hamadani 2, P Caimi 3, E Reid 4, K Havenith 5, S He 6, JM Feingold 6, O O Connor 7 1 Department of Medicine, Oncology Division, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA; 2 Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; 3 University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; 4 Department of Hematology/Oncology, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA; 5 ADC Therapeutics, London, UK; 6 ADC Therapeutics, Murray Hill, NJ, USA; 7 Center for Lymphoid Malignancies, Columbia University Medical Center New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA Wednesday 14 June, 217 14th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (ICML)

Disclosures Drs. Kahl, Hamadani, Caimi, Reid, and O Connor have received research funding from ADC Therapeutics for their centers participation in this study. Drs. Havenith, He, and Feingold are employees of ADC Therapeutics. 2

CD19 as a Therapeutic Molecular Target Human CD19 is a 95 kilodalton (kda) type I transmembrane glycoprotein belonging to the immunoglobulin Ig super family 1 Once bound by an antibody, CD19 is rapidly internalized by the cell 2 The majority of B cell malignancies express CD19 at normal to high levels: 3 8% 88% 1% ALL B-cell lymphomas B-cell leukemias 1. Carter RH and Barrington RA. Curr Dir Autoimmun. 24;7:4 32; 2. Blanc V et al. Clin Cancer Res. 211;17(2):6448-6458; 3.Wang K et al. Exp Hematol Oncol. 212;1:36. 3

Pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) Dimers as Anti-Tumor Agents PBD is DNA cross-linking agent Non-distortive of DNA Less visible to DNA repair mechanisms Effective in MDR (+) cell lines Non-tubulin approach Active in slowly proliferating cancers Measurable pharmacodynamic endpoints Demonstrable Therapeutic Index IC5 potency in picomolar range (1-12 ) 4

Pyrrolobenzodiazepine Comparison of Free Drug Potency Methotrexate Auristatin Doxyrubicin Calicheamicin Daunomycin PBD Maytansine Taxol/Taxotere Vinblastine 1-12 1-11 1-1 1-9 1-8 1-7 1-6 Free drug potency (IC5, M) The PBD dimer in ADCT-31 is designated as SG3199 5

ADCT-42 PBD Molecular Structure 8-polyethylene glycol Proteasesensitive valine-alanine linker Para-aminobenzoic acid Humanized monoclonal antibody specific for human CD19 of the immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) kappa isotype Maleimide Linker component SG3199 PBD dimer Self-immolative group CD19-specific IgG1 Tesirine/SG3249 PBD linker comprising the PBD dimer SG3199 and all linker components (stochastic conjugation) 6

ADCT-42 Mechanism of Action ADCT-42 ADCT-42 binds to the CD19 antigen on the tumor cell surface CD19 Following internalization of the ADC, the protease-sensitive linker is cleaved and the cytotoxic PBD dimer is released inside the cell The free PBD dimers bind in the minor groove of the cell DNA and forms potent cytotoxic DNA cross-links in a sequence-selective fashion. The cross-links result in a stalled DNA replication fork, blocking cell division and causing cancer cell death Cytotoxic cross-links Stalled DNA replication fork 1. Hartley JA. The development of pyrrolobenzodiazepines as antitumour agents. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 211;2(6):733-744. 7

ADCT-42-11 Phase I Study (NCT266917) Part 1: Dose escalation R/R B-cell lineage non-hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL)* Failed, or intolerant to, any established therapy OR No other available treatment options (investigator opinion) No intra-patient dose escalation allowed 1 hour IV infusion (15 2 µg/kg) Day 1 every 3 weeks Dose Level ADCT-42 Dose (µg/kg) 1 15 2 3 3 6 4 9 5 12 6 15 7 2 Part 2: Dose expansion using the recommended dose from Part 1 * Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; Follicular lymphoma; Chronic lymphocytic leukemia; Mantle cell lymphoma; Marginal Zone B-cell lymphoma; Burkitt s lymphoma; Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia) 8

ADCT-42-11 Phase I Study (NCT266917) PRIMARY STUDY OBJECTIVES Evaluate the safety and tolerability and determine the maximum tolerated dose of ADCT-42 Determine the recommended dose of ADCT-42 for dose expansion (Part 2) Evaluate the safety and tolerability of ADCT-42 at the dose level recommended in Part 1 SECONDARY STUDY OBJECTIVES Evaluate the clinical activity of ADCT-42 as measured by overall response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival Characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of ADCT-42 Evaluate anti-drug antibodies in blood before, during, and after treatment with ADCT-42 9

Patient Enrollment By Dose Latest interim data cut off: 1 May 217 Interim study populations 15 (n=4) 3 (n=4) 6 (n=4) 9 (n=5) Dose (µg/kg) 12 (n=14) 15 (n=1) 2 (n=24) Total (N=65) Pts enrolled (n[%]) Safety analysis set 4 (1) 4 (1) 4 (1) 5 (1) 12 (85.7) 1 (1) 23 (95.8) 62 (95.4) DLT-evaluable analysis set 4 (1) 4 (1) 4 (1) 5 (1) 12 (85.7) 5 (5.) 2 (83.3) 54 (83.1) Efficacy analysis set 4 (1) 4 (1) 4 (1) 5 (1) 12 (85.7) 3 (3.) 16 (66.7) 48 (73.8) Enrollment for Phase 1a is ongoing 1

Patient Baseline Characteristics Sex* Race (n[%]) Age (years)* Patient Baseline Characteristic Female Male White Black or African American Asian Other Median (Min, Max) Total (N=62) 21 (33.9) 41 (66.1) 58 (93.5) 2 (3.2) 67. (24, 85) Number of previous chemotherapies Median (Min, Max) 3. (1., 1.) Prior chemotherapy response status (n[%])* Prior stem cell transplantation (n[%])* Relapsed Refractory Missing Yes No 23 (37.1) 38 (61.3) 15 (24.2) 47 (75.8) * Safety analysis set 11

Patient Diagnosis at Baseline Patient Diagnosis at Baseline Total (N=62) Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) Mantle cell lymphoma Follicular lymphoma (FL) Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) Marginal Zone B-cell lymphoma Transformed follicular lymphoma High-grade B-cell lymphoma Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma Mixed DLBCL-Burkitt s lymphoma Small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL)/CLL CLL/SLL recurrence and simultaneous FL 41 (66.1) 9 (14.5) 4 (6.5) 12

Most Common TEAEs Listed by Grade (By Preferred Term) Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) Grade 1 (n) Grade 2 (n) Grade 3 (n) Grade 4 (n) Grade 5 (n) All Grades (n[%]) Non-hematologic* Nausea Vomiting Abdominal pain Fatigue Peripheral edema Increased γ-glutamyltransferase Decreased appetite Myalgia Dyspnea Pleural effusion Maculopapular rash Hematologic Decreased hemoglobin Decreased platelet count Decreased neutrophil count 13 8 5 14 14 3 8 4 3 5 1 29 22 2 3 1 5 12 2 3 3 7 5 3 2 24 7 11 1 4 5 3 1 7 8 15 1 7 7 N/A N/A N/A 16 (25.8) 9 (14.5) 11 (17.7) 3 (48.4) 16 (25.8) 12 (19.4) 11 (17.7) 11 (17.7) 11 (17.7) 9 (14.5) 12 (19.4) 6 (98.4) 44 (72.1) 35 (62.5) * All-Grades total of n 9 All hematologic values are sourced from laboratory measurements. Missing values have been excluded from the All-Grades calculations. 13

Number of TEAEs by Grade and Dose TEAE Grade 15 (n=4) 3 (n=4) 6 (n=4) 9 (n=5) Dose (µg/kg) 12 (n=12) 15 (n=1) 2 (n=23) Total (N=62) 12 (n=45) Grade 1 1 2 2 1 3 9 (14.5) 4 (8.9) Grade 2 2 1 3 1 5 12 (19.4) 9 (2.) Grade 3 1 1 2 4 4 9 21 (33.9) 17 (37.8) Grade 4 1 1 1 3 7 13 (21.) 1 (22.2) Grade 5 1 1 1 3 (4.8) 2 (4.4) All Grades 4 3 4 5 12 8 22 58 (93.5) 42 (93.3) 14

Drug Exposure The median number of ADCT-42 cycles received to date is 2 (range 1 14) The median duration of treatment is 43 days (range 7 296) Dose (µg/kg) n Total number of cycles dosed (Median [Min, Max]) Duration of treatment (days) (Median [Min. Max]) 15 4 2. (2, 7) 43. (34, 147) 3 4 2. (2, 13) 43.5 (43, 274) 6 4 2. (1, 14) 43. (22, 296) 9 5 4. (3, 11) 87. (64, 231) 12 12 3.5 (2, 9) 81. (43, 241) 15 1 1.5 (1, 3) 21. (16, 72) 2 23 2. (1, 3) 32. (7, 296) Total 62 2. (1, 14) 43. (7, 296) 15

PK Exposure vs Time and Dose ADCT42 Total Antibody C avg vs. Dose Cycle 1 PBD-Conjugated Antibody Mean Concentration vs Time by Dose (µg/kg) Cycle 1 C avg (µg/l) 2 15 1 5 Dose (µg/kg) 15 3 6 9 12 15 2 Concentration (µg/l) 3 1 3 1 Dose (µg/kg) 15 3 6 9 12 15 2 5 Limit of quantitation 5 1 15 2 Dose (µg/kg) 5 1 15 2 Time (days) Exposure metrics (C avg shown), as well as C max, C trough, and AUC, based on total Ab concentration increase with dose Modest accumulation seen for 9, 12 and 2 µg/kg with multiple doses; variability increases proportionately with exposure PK profiles for PBD-antibody conjugate are comparable to total antibody Concentrations of unconjugated warhead (SG3199) were predominantly below quantifiable limit 16

Best Overall Responses* at Each ADCT-42 Dose All Patients Dose (µg/kg) Response (n[%]) Complete Response (CR) Partial Response (PR) Stable Disease (SD) Progressive Disease (PD) Overall Response Rate (CR +PR) 15 (n=4) 3 (n=4) 6 (n=4) 9 (n=5) 12 (n=12) 15 (n=3) 2 (n=16) Total (N=48) 12 (n=31) 1 1 5 1 7 15 (31.3) 13 (41.9) 1 1 1 1 2 3 9 (18.8) 6 (19.4) 1 3 3 2 9 (18.8) 5 (16.1) 2 3 3 3 4 15 (31.3) 7 (22.6) 1 1 1 2 6 3 1 24 (5.) 19 (61.3) * Best visit responses based on the 214 Lugano Classification Criteria. All efficacy assessments to date have been investigator-determined 17

Nodal Regression All Patients* (Best Percentage Change From Baseline) Best Percentage Change From Baseline (%) 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8-1 163.84 + 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 111121314151617181922122232425262728293313233343536373839441424344 Subjects 15 µg/kg (n=3) 3 µg/kg (n=4) 6 µg/kg (n=3) 9 µg/kg (n=5) 12 µg/kg (n=12) 15 µg/kg (n=3) 2 µg/kg (n=14) * All efficacy assessments to date have been investigator-determined 18

Best Overall Responses* at Each ADCT-42 Dose DLBCL Patients Dose (µg/kg) Response (n[%]) Complete Response (CR) Partial Response (PR) Stable Disease (SD) Progressive Disease (PD) Overall Response Rate (CR + PR) 15 (n=2) 3 (n=3) 6 (n=3) 9 (n=2) 12 (n=1) 15 (n=1) 2 (n=1) Total (N=31) 12 (n=21) 1 4 1 4 1 (32.3) 9 (42.9) 1 1 2 4 (12.9) 3 (14.3) 1 1 3 2 7 (22.6) 5 (23.8) 1 2 3 2 2 1 (32.3) 4 (19.) 1 5 5 1 6 14 (45.2) 12 (57.1) * Best visit responses based on the 214 Lugano Classification Criteria. All efficacy assessments to date have been investigator-determined 19

Nodal Regression DLBCL Patients* (Best Percentage Change From Baseline) Best Percentage Change From Baseline (%) 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8-1 163.84 + 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3 Subjects 15 µg/kg (n=3) 3 µg/kg (n=4) 6 µg/kg (n=3) 9 µg/kg (n=5) 12 µg/kg (n=12) 15 µg/kg (n=3) 2 µg/kg (n=14) * All efficacy assessments to date have been investigator-determined 2

Summary In this first in-human study, ADCT-42 has demonstrated encouraging single-agent anti-tumor activity and manageable toxicity in patients with recurrent B-cell lineage NHL who had failed or were intolerant to established therapies, or who had no other treatment options available One DLT (worsening thrombocytopenia at 2 μg/kg) has been reported and the MTD has not yet been reached At doses 12 μg/kg, the overall response rate was: 61% in the total R/R B-NHL patient population (comprising 42% CR and 19% PR) 57% in patients with R/R DLBCL (comprising 43% CR and 14% PR) Further evaluation in specific NHL subtypes is now warranted A dose expansion in DLBCL is planned 21