Ethical Practice in Music Therapy

Similar documents
Strengthening user involvement in Northern Ireland: a summary and

Student Guide To Ethics Review For Research Involving Human Subjects

Protecting Human Subjects In Social-Behavioral-Educational Research:

Research Consent Form Newton-Wellesley Hospital 2014 Washington Street Newton, MA 02462

IRB policy and procedures 1. Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College

Responsible Conduct of Research: Responsible Authorship. David M. Langenau, PhD, Associate Professor of Pathology Director, Molecular Pathology Unit

IRB Reviewer Worksheet for Expedited Reviews

MC IRB Protocol No.:

The AAA statement on Ethnography and Institutional Review Boards (2004) provides a useful working definition:

Application for Ethical Approval of Research Proposals

We are inviting you to participate in a research study/project that has two components.

Testimony of. Eric J. Cassell, M.D., M.A.C.P. Member, National Bioethics Advisory Commission. and. Clinical Professor of Public Health

RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN PARTICIPANTS EXPEDITED/FULL APPLICATION

Institutional Review Board Application

Mental Capacity Implementation Programme. Mental Capacity Act 2005

IRB EXPEDITED REVIEW

POLICY. Institutional Research Projects/Data Requests #7220

The statutory regulation of dance movement therapists

The detection and management of pain in patients with dementia in acute care settings: development of a decision tool: Research protocol.

Marie Stopes International Informed Consent Guidelines for Research

Advance Statements. What is an Advance Statement? Information Line: Website: compassionindying.org.uk

Volunteering in NHSScotland Developing and Sustaining Volunteering in NHSScotland

Authorship Guidelines for CAES Faculty Collaborating with Students

Guidelines for Ethical Conduct of Behavioral Projects Involving Human Participants by High School Students

ALCOHOL & OTHER DRUGS

Dear all, For the service user survey:

A dissertation by. Clare Rachel Watsford

PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION TO USE HUMAN PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH

DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY. Checklist A Research Ethics Checklist for Investigations involving Human Participants

Introduction. Click here to access the following documents: 1. Application Supplement 2. Application Preview 3. Experiential Component

Carers Forums in Cornwall. Minutes of the meeting held at Penzance on 30 th May 2013 in The Board Room at the One Stop Shop, St Clare, Penzance

What are the experiences of therapeutic relationships on in-patient wards by people who dissociate?

Request for Proposals

CROSS HEALTH CARE BOUNDARIES MATERNITY CLINICAL GUIDELINE. One

CAPE PENINSULA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY HEALTH AND WELLNESS SCIENCES RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE

Peer review of a scientific manuscript. Hanan Hamamy

*Explain the purpose & role of the IRB *Explain the IRB Review Categories *Discuss the potential risks to research participants

Please take time to read this document carefully. It forms part of the agreement between you and your counsellor and Insight Counselling.

Guidelines for indigenous allied health, indigenous enrolled nurses, Aboriginal health workers and Aboriginal health practitioners applying for

Title: Singing About Expected Behaviors For Group Instruction

Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures

for Music Therapy Supervision

Annual Report 2014/15

The Accessible Information Standard - guidance for practices

Supervisor Handbook for the Diploma of Diagnostic Ultrasound (DDU)

Multi-agency collaboration and service provision in the early years

About this consent form

2. Definition of Research. 3. When Is Ethics Approval Required? 4. SAE EU Scholarship and Research Ethics Committee Membership. 4.2.

I. HSC Review and Approval of Research Involving Children

Type of Review Requested:

Risk communication in dementia care practice

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH AT ORANGE COAST COLLEGE

Mental Health Strategy. Easy Read

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Procedure

Instructions for Ethics Review Application Form

MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE USER INVOLVEMENT Service User Involvement Project Worker The job description does not form part of the contract of employment

Results. NeuRA Worldwide incidence April 2016

Research Ethics: A Brief Introduction. February 2017 Dina Shafey, Associate Director, ORE

PROCEDURE Mental Capacity Act. Number: E 0503 Date Published: 20 January 2016

April A. Working with Individuals at risk for Suicide: Attitudes and Approach

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO CONSENT TO BE IN RESEARCH

HSPC/IRB Description of Research Form (For research projects involving human participants)

Consent to research. A draft for consultation

Autism Advisor Program NSW

Grade 9 Consent 2. Learner Outcomes. Content & Timing. Required Materials. Background Information

We are inviting you to participate in a research study/project that has two components.

New Jersey Department of Children and Families Policy Manual. Date: Chapter: A Health Services Subchapter: 1 Health Services

Hounslow Safeguarding Children Board. Training Strategy Content.. Page. Introduction 2. Purpose 3

Autism Advisor Program NSW

OHRP Guidance on the Involvement of Prisoners in Research

Insight. A message from the Director. In this issue

Q: What can you tell us about the work you do and your involvement with children with autism?

Available at: Bioethics.gov

FORUM: QUALITATIVE SOCIAL RESEARCH SOZIALFORSCHUNG

Ethical Caregiving What we Owe: The President s Council on Bioethics. William J. Kirkpatrick, LICSW

Mid Essex Specialist Dementia and Frailty Service

PEER REVIEW HISTORY ARTICLE DETAILS TITLE (PROVISIONAL)

Study protocol. Version 1 (06 April 2011) Ethics ref: R&D ref: UK CRC portfolio ID:

Professional Development: proposals for assuring the continuing fitness to practise of osteopaths. draft Peer Discussion Review Guidelines

Mermaids Summary. Why is Mermaids needed? Mermaids Services

EVMS Authorship Guidelines

Evidence Based Practice Position Statement

Critiquing Research and Developing Foundations for Your Life Care Plan. Starting Your Search

Local Healthwatch Quality Statements. February 2016

Dementia Priority Setting Partnership. PROTOCOL March 2012

Autism Advisor Program NSW

The Committee noted that the main issues raised in the challenge to the favourable opinion were as follows;

PARTICIPANT WORKBOOK Positive and Protective: Sexuality and Autism Spectrum Disorder

Author s response to reviews

Veterans Certified Peer Specialist Training

Problem solving therapy

MDCH IRB REVIEW APPLICATION Authority: Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46

IRB for Humanists. Naomi E. Coll, MPH, CPH, CIP Manager of Research Integrity

Distraction techniques

Certified Peer Specialist Training Application

Code of Practice on Authorship

APPLICATION/RESEARCH PROTOCOL REVIEW FORM

WELSH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE COMMITTEE: INQUIRY INTO NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES

PEER REVIEW HISTORY ARTICLE DETAILS TITLE (PROVISIONAL)

Transcription:

Ethical Practice Ethical Practice in Music Therapy Date: January 2013 WFMT Commission on Research and Ethics: Dr. Clare O Callaghan (Chair), Dr. Daphne Rickson, Dr. Eric Miller, Dr. Soo Ji Kim, Dr. Lars Ole Bonde Ethics and Informed Consent Requirements for Publication of Music Therapy Research Music therapy journals usually make statements about ethics and informed consent requirements for research that they will publish. This paper presents information related to ethics and informed consent, which music therapists need to consider when planning to do research. It also describes different types of research contexts and associated issues related to ethics and informed consent. The paper is aimed to encourage consideration about issues rather than be a definitive statement about what is needed for journals. Music therapy researchers are encouraged to approach journal editors to clarify any uncertainty related to whether proposed research would need ethics approval and participant informed consent for publication in their journal. What is Music Therapy Research? Music therapy research can be defined as a systematic inquiry which leads to a discovery or new insight, which when documented and disseminated, contributes to or modifies existing knowledge of practice (Bruscia, 1998). Music therapy research stems from a number of philosophical perspectives; it utilizes a broad range of methodologies; and it asks diverse questions on theory, practice with varying populations, and professional issues. Depending on the topic, research may be collaborative with other disciplines, and take place within interdisciplinary research teams. Data can be collected from varied sources, including: 1. objective measures, such as physiological responses. 2. subjective measures, such as quality of life measures or a client s statements of her/his experiences. 3. therapists or other observers' interpretations of sessions. 4. therapeutic products (e.g., song lyrics; musical improvisations). 5. other relevant artifacts (e.g., music therapy texts; visual images). If the research question is systematically examined through a research methodology, which is informed by a methodology already described in the music therapy or related academic literature, it can be described as research. Types of research being published in music therapy and allied refereed journals include: 1. Participants receive an intervention or control condition in a specific research design. 2. Participants receive an intervention in a pre-post-test design. 3. Qualitative analysis of experiential data (e.g., clients verbal description of music experiences or interviews with clients on their music experiences). 1

4. Participant health workers (including music therapists & students ) music therapy related reflections (e.gs., in surveys, interviews, diaries), including about their own work. 5. Sole health worker s, music therapist s or student s self-reflections about music therapy related phenomena, including their own work. 6. Retrospective audit (e.g., examining already collected music therapy reports). 7. Prospective audit (e.g., features of clients accepting music therapy). 8. Case series (e.g., interventions and outcomes for 3 children with Asperger s syndrome). 9. Case report (intervention and outcome). What is Informed Consent? Participants involved in research are usually required to be adequately informed about and consent to participating in the research. Ethics committees always request that research participants, if possible, read and sign a Participant Information and Consent Form or similar before participating in a study. Alternately, research committees may approve a situation whereby participants give implied consent after being informed of the study: their participation in the study signifies consent. When a potential research participant is unable to give informed consent, or is regarded as too vulnerable to give informed consent (e.gs., a child or a person with late stage dementia), their guardians must give informed consent on their behalf. An assent form should also be written for anyone (e.gs., the child or older adult) who is able to indicate willingness to participate, in language that they would understand. If an agency is involved in the study, a consent form also must be written for the agency. When seeking informed consent Participant Information and Consent Forms (or Information Sheets when seeking implied consent) usually includes the following information: Introduction to and purpose of the research project; what research participation involves; its possible benefits and risks; a statement that research involvement is voluntary, that they can withdraw any time before their information is included in the analysis process, and that withdrawing from the research will not affect their future care; whether they will be informed about the study s findings; what happens to their personal information which is obtained for the study; whether they can access this information, the research committee which has approved the study; and to whom they can express concerns about the research by phone or mail. What Does it Mean to get Ethics Approval for Research? Ethics Review Committees are called different things in different institutions (hospitals, schools, universities, etc) and countries. For example in Australian hospitals, they are called Human Research and Ethics Committees (HREC), and in the USA they are called Institutional Review Boards (IRB). Committees also can be established in universities to review studies in private practice or studies in countries without public or institution committees. These committees are established to approve, monitor, and review research in order to protect the welfare and rights of human research participants or people whose clinical records will be used for research, and the researchers themselves. Their purpose is to ensure that music therapy research is conducted ethically to minimize harm and maintain the welfare and rights of research participants and others whose clinical records are being examined, either with or without their permission. Ethics committees usually provide guidelines for how to submit research applications. Sometimes they have different guidelines for high risk and low risk research. For some agencies and in some countries, the researchers also must take an on-line ethics course to be approved to complete the study. Examples of these courses are at the following sites: http://phrp.nihtraining.com/users/login.php or https://www.citiprogram.org/default.asp. Registering Clinical Trial In some countries (e.g., Australia, New Zealand), medical journals require that research trials (e.g., randomised controlled trials) submitted to their journal for publication have been pre-registered on a Register of Clinical Trials. While this is not required by any music therapy journals at present, those hoping to publish their music therapy research in a medical journal are advised to clarify whether this is a prerequisite of the journal in which they hope to publish their research. (For further information see: http://www.who.int/ictrp/en) 2

When Should I Seek Ethics Approval for my Research? Music therapists are advised to ensure that they have obtained all necessary ethics approvals that their organization requires, and also that the journals they hope to publish in require before beginning their research. What if the Ethics Committee or its Chairperson, or My Manager Says, I Don t Need Ethics Approval or Informed Consent? Even if an ethics committee or its chairperson states that ethics approval or informed consent is not needed for a specific research project, a journal editor may still require a letter from the ethics committee or its chairperson who stated this when the article is submitted for publication. It is therefore advisable to get this information in a written form, from the ethics committee or its chairperson, before commencing the research. What Happens when the Organization associated with the Research does not have an Ethics Committee? In some international clinical and community music therapy contexts, ethics committees are not available. In such instances, a manager may give permission for the research to be conducted. This may or may not be acceptable to various journal editors, and will likely depend on the type of research. Furthermore, journal ethics requirements may alter over time. If in doubt about individual journal requirements, music therapists should approach the journal editors to explain their anticipated research and clarify the situation. It is advised that music therapists working in these contexts help to establish research and ethics committees to oversee music therapy research. Local health authorities may be able to assist. 1 Is Ethics Approval Needed for Research on Music Therapists Perspectives? When research is conducted on music therapists or students professional perspectives, ethics approval may or may not be required. Signed consent also may or may not be required when the music therapists are collaborating as participant-researchers. Again, when planning this kind of research, music therapists are advised to obtain all necessary approvals that their clinical or community contexts require, and approvals, information, or letters that the journals in which they want to publish require. It is important to remember that there is a potential risk for clients to be implicated when music therapists and students examine their own clinical reflections. What are Case Series and Case Report, and are they Research? Many music therapy articles include case vignettes, or studies, that is, descriptions and discussions of work with clients. It is important to consider whether these descriptions/discussions are regarded as research in your clinical context and whether ethics approval is required to present them. A case series is a research method that describes patients (or clients) with a similar condition or conditions, the intervention experienced, and the outcome, usually followed by a related discussion. A case report is the same kind of research method, except usually only one patient or client is examined. Collecting information from a medical history or other kind of client record, with the intention of publishing or presenting the information in a scholastic context (journal, book chapter, conference), meets the criteria of research. It is advised that music therapists consult their organizations ethics committees, managers, and journal editors about whether ethics approval is needed for case series and case reports intended for scholastic presentation and publication. Are Clinical Audits/Program Evaluations Research? In some organizations music therapists are encouraged to conduct internal audits or program evaluations to improve the quality of their services within their organization. In Australia this is commonly called a quality assurance activity. Music therapists may conduct audits on retrospective information (e.g., collecting and analyzing already written music therapy reports) or prospective information (e.g., collecting and examining demographic features of clients who accept music therapy). While these 1 The American Psychological Association Committee of Psychology Teachers at Community Colleges created a document to help college staff establish their own IRBs. Their document and its links may also assist: http://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/undergrad/ptacc/institutional-review-board.aspx# 3

audits also can be regarded as research 2 they may proceed without prior approval from an ethics committee. This can be a problem, however, if the music therapist auditor/researcher wishes to submit the findings for publication, as some journals will only publish some kinds of research if it has ethics approval. Music therapists who anticipate that they may want to publish these kinds of findings, or present them at a public scholarly meeting, are encouraged to get ethics approval for their audit work, or a written statement that the work does not need ethics approval from an appropriate authority in their organization. How do I get Ethics Approval for Research in Private Practice? If you are enrolled in a university research program, the university may have an ethics committee. Other options include seeking approval from the ethics committee of your professional music therapy association (if it has one), or seeking a research partnership with a colleague or university supervisor affiliated with an organization that has an ethics committee that can approve the study. Do Various Journals Have Different Ethical Requirements for Publishing Research? Music therapy journal ethics submission and informed consent requirements, where available, can be found in the links listed in Table 1. Music Therapy Journal Editors seem to consistently agree that research and ethics committee consent is required for research trials and qualitative research involving research participants who receive a music therapy or music and medicine intervention. Journal policies may reflect standards associated with inclusion in respected databases (e.gs., MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL). 3 Some journals may require that studies meets standards of international quality assurance systems, such as CONSORT, which stands for "Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials." CONSORT aims to reduce problems in the reports of randomized controlled trials. Further information, including a checklist and a flow chart, can be found at: http://www.consort-statement.org/. Other statements applicable to qualitative and mixed methods research are also available, e.g.s., Stige & colleagues EPICURE (Qual Health Res October 2009 vol. 19 no. 10 1504-1516) and Ken Aigen s guidelines for publishing qualitative research (Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 21(2): 109-110). These statements can be found in short form at http://voices.no/?q=epicure (Stige et al.) and http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08098131.2012.685274 (Aigen). The WFMT respects all music therapy journals editorial policies and encourages ongoing dialogue and reflection about what is appropriate to ensure ethical and viable research practice. Final Notes Music therapy conference committees also are increasingly requesting that authors specify whether proposed research presentations have ethics approval from approved authorities. In research journal articles and conference presentations, the WFMT recommends that music therapy researchers always state: (a) whether their studies have received ethical approval; (b) whether and how participant consent was obtained; or (c) the authority that said that either of the aforementioned were not required. References Bruscia, K. E. (1998). Defining music therapy (2nd ed). Gilsum, NH: Barcelona. Schroter, S., Plowman, R., Hutchings, A., & Gonzalez, A. (2006). Reporting ethics committee approval and patient consent by study design in five general medical journals. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32, 718 723. 2 In most biomedical journals, authors of research on human participants must state whether the study had ethics approval and how participant consent was obtained. This is the case even with de-identified audit type research. Ethics committees, however, can approve research on patient records, which does not require patient consent. [Further information about rationales for biomedical ethics requirements can be found at: Schroter, Plowman, Hutchings, & Gonzalez, (2006).] 3 Databases contain citations and summaries of peer-reviewed journal articles and, sometimes, books chapters, books, and theses related to an academic field. 4

Table 1. Location of Information about Music Therapy Journals Ethics Approval Requirements a Approaches: Music Therapy and Special Music Education Australian Journal of Music Therapy British Journal of Music Therapy1 Canadian Journal of Music Therapy Journal of Music Therapy Korean Journal of Music Therapy Korean Journal of Music Therapy Education Music Therapy Perspectives Music Therapy Today New Zealand Journal of Music Therapy Nordic Journal of Music Therapy http://approaches.primarymusic.gr/approaches/content/view/ 27/46/lang,en/ Google: Australian music therapy association code of ethics (comes up as pdf) Hard copy of Journal (currently under review) http://www.musictherapy.ca/journal.htm#submit http://www.musictherapy.org/research/pubs/#the_journal_of_ Music_Therapy http://www.musictherapy.or.kr/zeroboard/zboard.php?id=doc ument http://www.komtea.org http://www.musictherapy.org/research/pubs/#music_therapy_ Perspectives http://www.musictherapytoday.wfmt.info/music_therapy_toda y/home.html http://www.musictherapy.org.nz/journal/ http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/journal.asp?issn=0809-8131&linktype=44 Voices: A World Forum for Music https://normt.uib.no/index.php/voices/about/submissions#auth Therapy orguidelines a If you are an editor of a music therapy journals not listed here, please contact the Chair of the WFMT Research and Ethics Commission so that your journal may be included. 5

6 Approved by the WFMT council on December 19, 2012