Predictors of Averse Events After Total Laryngectomy: An Analysis of the NSQIP Datasets

Similar documents
Wojciech K. Mydlarz, M.D. Pharyngocutaneous Fistulas after Salvage Laryngectomy: Need for Vascularized Tissue

ACS-NSQIP 2015 Julietta Chang MD, Ali Aminian MD, Stacy A Brethauer MD, Philip R Schauer MD Bariatric and Metabolic Institute

Predicting Short Term Morbidity following Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

A Comparative Analysisof Male versus Female Breast Cancer in the ACS NSQIP Database

Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass?

The Impact of Chronic Liver Disease on Postoperative Outcomes and Resource Utilization within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Database

Outcomes of Patients with Preoperative Weight Loss following Colorectal Surgery

Self-Assessment Module 2016 Annual Refresher Course

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

How to Address an Inappropriately high Mortality Rate? Joe Sharma, MD Associate Professor of Surgery NSQIP Surgical Champion

American Head and Neck Society - Journal Club Volume 22, July 2018

Gourin et al.: Long-Term Outcomes of Larynx Cancer Care in the Elderly

Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Patients Undergoing Laryngectomy for Laryngeal Cancer

Salvage Laryngectomy. after R T Failure Indications, Complications and Results. Aug

Postdischarge Complications Predict Reoperation and Mortality after Otolaryngologic Surgery

Form 1: Demographics

Comparison of Risk Factors for Unplanned Conversion from Laparoscopic and Robotic to Open Colorectal Surgery

Supplementary Online Content

Predictors of Readmission after Inpatient Plastic Surgery

Presented By: Samik Patel MD. Martinovski M 1, Patel S 1, Navratil A 2, Zeni T 3, Jonker M 3, Ferraro J 1, Albright J 1, Cleary RK 1

Research Article Predictors of Salivary Fistulas in Patients Undergoing Salvage Total Laryngectomy

Michael Minarich, MD General Surgery Resident, PGY4 Cooper University Hospital

MAKING THE NSQIP PARTICIPANT USE DATA FILE (PUF) WORK FOR YOU

Laryngeal Conservation

A comparison of peri-operative outcomes between elective and non-elective total hip arthroplasties

Preoperative Biliary Drainage Among Patients With Resectable Hepatobiliary Malignancy: Does Technique Matter?

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. Department of Public Health Sciences

Survey of Laryngeal Cancer at SBUH comparing 108 cases seen here from to the NCDB of 9,256 cases diagnosed nationwide in 2000

Insulin Dependence Heralds Adverse Events After Hip And Knee Arthroplasty

Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated head and neck oncologic surgery: a retrospective cohort study

Demographics. MBSAQIP Case Number: *ACS NSQIP Case Number: *LMRN: *DOB: / / *Gender: Male Female

Postoperative Surgical Site Infection after Incisional Hernia Repair: Link to Previous Surgical Site Infection? Zulfiqar Ali, AG Rehan

Peri-operative factors predisposing to pharyngocutaneous fistula after total laryngectomy: analysis of a large multiinstitutional

Dr. P. Gullane Wharton Chair Head & Neck Surgery Professor Department of Otolaryngology -Head & Neck Surgery University of Toronto

Updated NSQIP Frailty Index

EPO-144 Patients with Morbid Obesity and Congestive Heart Failure Have Longer Operative Time and Room Time in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Association of a Modified Frailty Index with Postoperative Outcomes after Ankle Fractures in Patients Aged 55 and Older

EFFECT OF AN ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY PROGRAM ON OPIOID USE AND PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Salvage Surgery After Failure of Nonsurgical Therapy for Carcinoma of the Larynx and Hypopharynx

Understanding Readmissions in Pediatric Surgery

American Head and Neck Society - Journal Club Volume 9, December 2016

Primary and salvage total laryngectomy. Influential factors, complications, and survival

Malnutrition: An independent Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications

Incidence and predictors of all-cause mortality within one year after adult spinal deformity surgery

Hypopharyngeal Cancer Incidence, Treatment, and Survival: Temporal Trends in the United States

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Comorbidity as a Major Risk Factor for Mortality and Complications in Head and Neck Surgery

Disclosures. Dr. Hall is a paid consultant to the American College of Surgeons (ACS) as Associate Director of ACS-NSQIP

Quality Indicators of Laryngeal Cancer Care in the Elderly

ADVANCED STATISTICAL METHODS: PART 1: INTRODUCTION TO PROPENSITY SCORES IN STATA. Learning objectives:

Is Readmission a Good Quality Measure for Surgical Care? Examining the Underlying Reasons for Readmissions after Surgery at ACS NSQIP Hospitals

Registry Highlights. Dale Daniel Symposium Hip Fracture Registry. Overall Volume by Year and Region 3/7/2014

Aanvraag gegevens ten behoeve van wetenschappelijk onderzoek

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS NATIONAL SURGICAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - PEDIATRIC Data Collection Worksheet

Technical Notes for PHC4 s Report on CABG and Valve Surgery Calendar Year 2005

Comparison of Open and Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms From the ACS-NSQIP

Cigdem Benlice, Ipek Sapci, T. Bora Cengiz, Luca Stocchi, Michael Valente, Tracy Hull, Scott R. Steele, Emre Gorgun 07/23/2018

Introduction. Roxanne L. Massoumi 1 Colleen M. Trevino

Supplementary Online Content

Risk Factors of Early Complications of Tracheostomy at Kenyatta National Hospital.

Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on Short-Term Outcomes and Cost of Oropharyngeal Cancer Surgical Care

Examination of Hospital-Level Variation in Preventing Post-Operative Sepsis

Risk Factors for Early Failure of Surgical Amputations: An Analysis of 8,878 Isolated Lower Extremity Amputation Procedures

Perioperative outcomes for pediatric neurosurgical procedures: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatrics

T1/T2 LARYNX CANCER. Click to edit Master Presentation Date. Thomas J Gernon, MD Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

EACTS Adult Cardiac Database

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters.

CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT (CABG) MEASURES GROUP OVERVIEW

Recognition of Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer Determines Inpatient Mortality

Persistent Tracheostomy after Organ Preservation Protocol in Patients Treated for Larynx and Hypopharynx Cancer

Risk Factors and Survival Outcomes for Patients With Anastomotic Leakage After. Surgery for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Surgical Consensus Standards Endorsement Maintenance NQF-Endorsed Surgical Maintenance Standards (Phase I) Table of Contents

ABSTRACT. KEY WORDS antibiotics; prophylaxis; hysterectomy

MANAGEMENT OF CA HYPOPHARYNX

Ankle fractures are one of

Laryngeal Preservation Using Radiation Therapy. Chemotherapy and Organ Preservation

Incidence of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery

Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to Improve Surgical Outcomes

Persistent tracheostomy after primary chemoradiation for advanced laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer

Use of Larynx-Preservation Strategies in the Treatment of Laryngeal Cancer. American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

ASTS TRANSQIP Beta Phase Informational Webinar

Surgery in Frail Elders. Emily Finlayson, MD, MS Department of Surgery University of California, San Francisco September, 2011

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

How to Address an Inappropriately high Readmission Rate?

Oscar Guillamondegui, MD, MPH, FACS Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative Associate Professor of Surgery Vanderbilt University Medical Center

SPECIAL TOPIC large body of research has established smoking as a causal factor for a myriad of chronic illnesses 2,3 ;

Plate Exposure after Reconstruction by Plate and Anterolateral Thigh Flap in Head and Neck Cancer Patients with composite mandibular Defects

The American Experience

TOTAL HIP AND KNEE REPLACEMENTS. FISCAL YEAR 2002 DATA July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002 TECHNICAL NOTES

Transoral robotic total laryngectomy: Report of 3 cases

Financial Implications of Pancreas Transplant Complications: A Business Case for Quality Improvement

Best Practices for Fast Track in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Bariatric Surgery

Head and Neck Cancer in FA: Risks, Prevention, Screening, & Treatment Options David I. Kutler, M.D., F.A.C.S.

The management of advanced supraglottic and

The influence of closure technique in total laryngectomy on the development of a pseudo-diverticulum and dysphagia

STRESS Trial: Steroids to Reduce Systemic inflammation after Neonatal Heart Surgery

Impact of Preoperative Bowel Preparation on the Risk of Clostridium Difficile after Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Weighted Analysis

Upstate New York Surgical Quality Initiative

Dr Yuen Wai-Cheung HA Convention 2011

Chapter 2: Identification and Care of Patients With CKD

Transcription:

Research Article J o u r n a l o f O t o l a r y n g o l o g y A d v a n c e s ISSN NO: 2379-8572 DOI : 10.14302/issn.2379-8572.joa-14-429 Predictors of Averse Events After Total Laryngectomy: An Analysis of the 2005-2011 NSQIP Datasets Alexei Mlodinow 1, Nima Khavanin 1, Courtney Shires 2, Sandeep Samant 2, Jon Ver Halen 3, John Kim 1 1 Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 2 Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 3 Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Surgery, St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Surgical Oncology, Vanderbilt- Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee Abstract Background: We reviewed the 2005-2011 ACS-NSQIP database to evaluate factors associated with adverse events (AE) after total laryngectomy (TL). Methods: All total laryngectomies performed from 2006 to 2011 were identified for analysis. The cohort was characterized with respect to preoperative and demographic characteristics, complications, reoperation, and mortality. Results: 493 cases were identified. Complications of any category occurred in 189 cases (38.3%). Factors that were found to confer significant risk for medical complications were increased age [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.03], prior PCI (OR 2.84), disseminated cancer (OR 2.47), chronic steroid/immunosuppresion use (OR 2.87), unintended weight loss > 10% over 6 months prior to surgery (OR 2.02), increasing work RVU total (OR 1.02), and increased anesthesia Z-score (OR 1.31). Only increased anesthesia Z-score (OR 1.27) was found to be a statistically significant risk factor for surgical complications. Chronic steroid/immunosuppression use (OR 3.16) and increased anesthesia Z-score (OR 1.29) were both found to be statistically significant risk factors of reoperation within 30 days. Conclusions: NSQIP is the only dataset that correctly discerns between minimally invasive and wide excision in laryngectomy. The use of the NSQIP dataset may be imperfect, as pertinent details of chemotherapy and radiation, and procedure-specific complications, including fistula formation, are not tracked. In spite of this, our findings suggest avenues for improvement in the care of TL patients, and suggest directions for a laryngectomy-specific outcomes database. Corresponding Author: Jon P Ver Halen, MD, FACS, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Baptist Cancer Center; Department of Surgery, St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital; Department of Surgical Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, 3268 Duke Circle, Germantown, TN 38139 Email: jpverhalen@gmail.com Tel: (206) 963-8714, Fax: (901) 227-9825 Running Head: Tracking laryngectomy using NSQIP Keywords: laryngectomy; NSQIP; outcomes; mortality; complications Received May 30, 2014; Accepted Oct 26, 2014; Published Nov 13, 2014; www.openaccesspub.org JOA CC-license DOI : 10.14302/issn.2379-8572.joa-14-429 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 12

Introduction The care of patients with laryngeal cancer has changed dramatically in the last two decades.. In 1991, the VA Laryngeal Cancer Study Group showed equivalent survival among patients undergoing laryngectomy versus chemoradiation. Subsequently, the use of primary chemoradiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer significantly increased, relative to the use of primary total laryngectomy. 1-4 Total laryngectomy is now used more often as a salvage procedure after chemoand/or radiation therapy. 4 Salvage surgery has a lower rate of survival after the failure of organ preservation, and has a well-established increased rate of data to that derived from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was instituted by the American College of Surgeons (ACS) in 2004. Over 250 variables are collected and recorded by nurses trained in surgical and clinical review, and outcomes are tracked for 30 days following surgery. 13 The participant use files provide a comprehensive set of reliable preoperative and intraoperative data, and postoperative data, with an only 1% rate of interobserver disagreement. 14-15 We investigate the role of surgical complexity, complications. 4-9 In addition, the rate of postoperative preoperative radiation therapy, preoperative fistula has increased from 52% to 84% over the past two decades. Wound healing complications and inhospital death are significantly higher in patients undergoing pedicled or free-flap reconstruction, and in patients with advanced comorbidities. 7,10-12 Prior radiation has also been found to be associated with increased rates of 30-day mortality. 4 The National Cancer Database (NCDB), Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Medicare Database (SEER), Department of Veterans Affairs National Quality Improvement registry (VA NSQIP), Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, and singleinstitution databases have all been used to determine factors responsible for undesirable outcomes in laryngectomy patients. 7 Our aim was to compare this chemotherapy, and comorbidities in medical and surgical complications, as well as in the rate of reoperation in laryngectomy patients. Methods Sample Population The ACS-NSQIP participant use files were reviewed for all total laryngectomies performed from 2006 to 2011, as represented by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 31360, 31365, 31390, and 31395 (Table 1). The cohort was characterized with respect to preoperative and demographic characteristics including age, BMI, gender, race, smoking status, alcohol use, diabetes, dyspnea, hypertension, dialysis, chronic steroid/ immunosuppression use, radiotherapy within 90 days, chemotherapy within 30 days, and prior www.openaccesspub.org JOA CC-license DOI : 10.14302/issn.2379-8572.joa-14-429 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 13

operation within 30 days. The cohort was then characterized with respect to overall complications, surgical complications (including surgical site infection, dehiscence, and flap/graft/prosthesis failure), medical complications (including MI, pneumonia, reintubation, PE, ventilator use longer than 48 hours, renal insufficiency, renal failure, UTI, CVA, coma, neurologic deficit, cardiac arrest, bleeding, DVT, sepsis, septic shock, and death), and reoperation within 30 days. Detailed definitions of all variables tracked by NSQIP are available in the user guide. 13 Table 1. List of included CPT codes Laryngectomy; total, without 31360 radical neck dissection Laryngectomy; total with radical 31365 neck dissection carried out to control for confounders and ascertain an independent odds ratio for each of the potential risk factors. Criteria for inclusion in the regression was p>0.2 and n>5 for all cells on initial screen. The same analysis was carried out for medical complications, surgical complications, and reoperation. Anesthesia time was changed into Z-scores representing standard deviation from the mean for the index CPT code. Results Sample Population 493 cases were abstracted from the participant use files on the basis of their CPT codes. Details of the cohort characteristics are represented in Table 2. The average age was 62.5 years (standard deviation of 11.4), and the average BMI 23.9 (standard deviation of 31390 31395 Pharyngolaryngectomy, with radical neck dissection; without reconstruction Pharyngolaryngectomy, with radical neck dissection; with reconstruction 6.5). 384 of the patients (77.9%) were male, and 372 (75.5%) were white. 249 (50.5%) of patients were smokers, and 60 (12.2%) had significant alcohol consumption. Comorbidities present included diabetes (12.8%), dyspnea (28.6%), hypertension (46.25%), and Statistical Analysis: The population was split on the basis of presence of any complication. Those with and without complications were compared with respect to a variety of preoperative variables in order to identify associated factors. Independent sample t-tests and chi squared tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A binomial logistic regression was then dialysis (1.0%). Steroid use was present in 26 (5.3%) of patients, radiotherapy in 18 (3.7%), chemotherapy in 13 (2.6%), and prior operation in 48 (9.7%). Complications of any category occurred in 189 cases (38.3%), with 72 cases (14.6%) experiencing surgical site complications, and 162 cases (32.9%) experiencing medical complications (Table 3). Specific surgical site complications included superficial incisional infections (6.3%), deep incisional infections (3.3%), www.openaccesspub.org JOA CC-license DOI : 10.14302/issn.2379-8572.joa-14-429 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 14

organ space infections (1.2%), dehiscence (4.7%), and flap/graft/prosthesis failure (1.8%). Medical complications included MI (0.4%), pneumonia (5.1%), unplanned reintubation (3.0%), failure to wean from ventilator (4.3%), neurologic deficit (0.2%), cardiac arrest (1.4%), bleeding (21.1%), DVT (1.4%), sepsis (4.9%), septic shock (0.4%), and death (2.0%). Reoperation within 30 days occurred in 67 cases (13.6%). Table 2. Patient demographics. Characteristic Frequency (Total n=493) n % Age* 62.5 (11.4) BMI* 23.9 (6.5) Female 109 22.11% Race White 372 75.46% Black 63 12.78% Asian 5 1.01% Other 53 10.75% Smoking 249 50.51% Alcohol 60 12.17% Diabetes 63 12.78% Dyspnea 141 28.60% Hypertension 228 46.25% Dialysis 5 1.01% Steroid Use 26 5.27% Radiotherapy 18 3.65% Chemotherapy 13 2.64% Disseminated 61 12.37% Prior Operation 48 9.74% *continuous variables given as "Mean (SD)" Statistical Analysis 11 potential risk factors fit inclusion criteria for the regression model for medical complications. Factors that were found to confer significant risk were increased age [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.03; 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 1.01-1.06], prior PCI (OR 2.84; 95% CI 1.30-6.20), disseminated cancer (OR 2.47; 1.19-5.11), steroid use (OR 2.87; 95% CI 1.05-7.82), unintended weight loss (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.10-3.70), increased RVU (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.03), and increased anesthesia Z- score (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07-1.61). The results of the regression are represented in Table 4. 5 potential risk factors were included in the regression for surgical complications. Only increased anesthesia Z-score (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.04-1.57) was found to be a statistically significant risk factor for surgical site complications. This is represented in Table 5. The regression model for reoperation included only 4 potential risk factors. Steroid use (OR 3.16; 95% CI 1.16-8.64) and increased anesthesia Z-score (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.04-1.60) were both found to be statistically significant risk factors of reoperation within 30 days. This is represented in Table 6. All p values reached significance at less than 0.05. www.openaccesspub.org JOA CC-license DOI : 10.14302/issn.2379-8572.joa-14-429 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 15

Table 3. Patient adverse events, including overall complications, surgical complications, medical complications, reoperation, and death. Complication Frequency (Total n % Overall Complications 189 38.34% Table 4. Multivariable regression analysis for medical Risk Factor p Value Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval Age* 0.004 1.034 1.01 1.058 BMI 0.875 1.003 0.967 1.04 COPD 0.393 1.291 0.719 2.317 Prior PCI* 0.009 2.837 1.298 6.199 Hypertension 0.612 1.14 0.688 1.888 Surgical Site 72 14.60% Superficial Infection 31 6.29% Deep Infection 16 3.25% Organ Space Infection 6 1.22% Dehiscence 23 4.67% Flap/Graft Failure 9 1.83% Medical Complications 162 32.86% MI 2 0.41% Pneumonia 25 5.07% Reintubation 15 3.04% Disseminated 0.015 2.467 1.19 5.114 Steroid Use* 0.04 2.866 1.051 7.815 Weight Loss* 0.024 2.015 1.098 3.7 ASA>2 0.975 0.987 0.428 2.274 Total RVU* < 0.001 1.024 1.016 1.031 Anesthesia 0.01 1.308 1.065 1.606 * indicates significant value (p < 0.05) H-L Statistic: 0.612 c-statistic: 0.809 PE 3 0.61% Ventilator>48 Hours 21 4.26% Renal Insufficiency 0 0.00% Renal Failure 0 0.00% UTI 11 2.23% CVA 4 0.81% Coma 0 0.00% Neurologic Deficit 1 0.20% Cardiac Arrest 7 1.42% Bleeding 104 21.10% DVT 7 1.42% Sepsis 24 4.87% Septic Shock 2 0.41% Death 10 2.03% Table 5. Multivariable regression analysis for surgical Risk Factor p Value Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval Diabetes 0.429 1.378 0.622 3.055 COPD 0.094 0.487 0.209 1.132 ASA>2 0.393 1.607 0.542 4.768 RVU 0.122 1.005 0.999 1.012 Anesthesia 0.022 1.274 1.036 1.567 * indicates significant value (p < 0.05) H-L Statistic: 0.598 c-statistic: 0.69 Reoperation 67 13.59% www.openaccesspub.org JOA CC-license DOI : 10.14302/issn.2379-8572.joa-14-429 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 16

Table 6. Multivariable regression analysis for reoperation. Risk Factor p Value Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval Steroid Use* 0.025 3.164 1.158 8.644 ASA>2 0.32 1.859 0.548 6.306 Total RVU 0.14 1.005 0.998 1.013 Anesthesia Time* 0.023 1.286 1.035 1.598 * indicates significant value (p < 0.05) H-L Statistic: 0.68 c-statistic: 0.68 for those patients at greatest risk. However, this requires the ability to develop accurate methods to identify high -risk patients. The predictive power of currently available AE models is generally poor. ACS-NSQIP is one of the largest, most comprehensive surgical databases Discussion available. 13 In many regards, it has detail on Although some surgical complications might be preventable, many are inherent risks associated with the procedure and are associated with safe management. Therefore, defining preventable or unnecessary adverse events is a challenge to ensure fair measurements of quality. Thirty-day adverse events, including complications, unplanned reoperation, and unplanned hospital readmissions represent a large financial burden to insurance payors, hospitals, and individual patients. In addition, they are increasingly surveyed as an indicator for health care quality, hospital performance, and a potential target for cost-containment. 16 It has been estimated that approximately $15 billion is spent on the 17.6% of patients who are readmitted within 30 days of discharge, and this measure has been identified by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MPAC) preoperative and postoperative characteristics unparalleled by other resources. Given the broad base of patients captured, and the greater than 250 variables collected, it is uniquely positioned to examine specific issues in the laryngectomy cohort. Furthermore, NSQIP is the only multicenter, international, and validated database that specifically identifies the type of laryngectomy performed, and is thus the only database capable of correctly identifying total laryngectomy (as included in this study) versus partial or minimally invasive laryngectomy. In the most generic terms, tracking of adverse events after laryngectomy agrees with previously-published literature on the subject. However, we noted a number of significant, critical differences. Compared to other databases, NSQIP greatly as a major improvement item for covered patients. The underestimates the utilization of laryngectomy. Using utility of these data extends to prevention measures: it could be used to assess risk factors for readmission, which in turn would allow the insurers to pool resources the National Cancer Database, Zhu, et al found 16,849 cases from 2003-2008, of whom 31% (approximately 5,100) underwent laryngectomy. 17 Gourin, et al www.openaccesspub.org JOA CC-license DOI : 10.14302/issn.2379-8572.joa-14-429 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 17

examined 78,478 cases between 1993 to 2008, and 24,856 cases between 2003 2008 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. 4 Schwartz, et al examined wound healing complications in 2063 patients undergoing total laryngectomy using the VA-NSQIP found an increased rate of wound complications after prior radiation (OR 1.63); finally, Ganly et al found increased rates of local wound (45% vs 25%) and fistula complications (32% vs 12%) after prior radiation therapy. 4,6,7 Chemotherapy has been shown to increase registry between 1989 1999. 7 While current treatment adverse events in some studies. 6 The South West strategies have led to a decrease in the utilization of total laryngectomy, this finding is likely because laryngectomy is not a specifically-tracked procedure Oncology Group reported a wound complication rate of 46% after 3 cycles of chemotherapy, whereas Cory et al reported a wound complication rate of 56% after within the NSQIP database, and could be addressed by induction chemotherapy. 18 In Ganly s study, multivariate adding it to the tracked procedures list. ACS-NSQIP only identifies the use of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy within the 30 and 90 days preceding the index procedure, respectively. Since a significant, and growing proportion of patients come to total laryngectomy after failure of primary treatment with chemotherapy and radiation, critical details of a given patient s preoperative history analysis showed that primary combined chemotherapy and radiation was an independent predictor of local complications and pharyngocutaneous fistula after total laryngectomy. 6 Other risk factors for increased adverse events were generally in agreement with other studies. These included increased age, prior PCI, disseminated cancer, chronic steroid and/or immunosuppression use, are missed. For instance, our analysis showed no unintended weight loss > 10% in the 6 months difference in 30-day outcomes regardless of the use of preceding the index procedure, increasing RVU total, previous chemo- or radiation therapy. In fact, the and increased anesthesia time. Only increased identified cohort found only 18 patients (3.7%) who had a history of previous radiotherapy, and only 13 patients (2.6%) who had a history of previous chemotherapy. Neither factors were found to be associated with adverse events. In the study by Zhu, et al, 42% of all patients had primary treatment with chemoradiation. 17 Gourin et al found an incrased rate of in-hospital death anesthesia time was found to be a statistically significant risk factor for surgical site complications. Chronic steroid and/or immunosuppression use and increased anesthesia time were both found to be statistically significant risk factors of reoperation within 30 days. There were no preoperative characteristics specifically associated with 30-day mortality. in patients with prior radiation (OR 3.94); Schwartz et al www.openaccesspub.org JOA CC-license DOI : 10.14302/issn.2379-8572.joa-14-429 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 18

The sum of the relative value units (RVUs) was used to evaluate for the added complexity and risk of concurrent procedures, as has been described previously. 19 RVUs reflect the relative level of time, skill, training and intensity required of a physician to provide a given service. RVUs therefore are a method for calculating the volume of work or effort expended by a physician in treating patients, and are set by CMS in association with a physician advisory council. For a patient undergoing multiple procedures, the respective RVU s can be summed to estimate the total complexity of a given set of procedures (e.g., laryngectomy + free flap reconstruction + tracheostomy + feeding tube in a patient undergoing laryngectomy as one of multiple procedures). Given the heterogeneity of procedures identified in NSQIP, total work RVU is the best way to assess for the overall complexity of a given set of procedures performed on a patient in one setting. Previous studies have suggested that concomitant neck dissection and/or flap reconstruction with laryngectomy is associated with increased complications, although these findings are controversial. 7,10-12 The use of RVU small compared to other database reviews, it is much larger than other studies of TL patients that have a similar level of granular detail with regard to demographic, operative and postoperative variables. Thus our findings are still relevant to the surgical community. In addition, the timeframe for tacking of preoperative radiation- and chemo-therapy is limited (as discussed above). Furthermore, NSQIP does not include data on total radiation dose, fractionation, exact radiation ports, and conventional radiation versus IMRT. Stratification into further categories based on these data points could result in further characterization of complications. There are several specific complications of laryngeal and neck operations that are not addressed in the NSQIP analysis. Success of voice rehabilitation, dysphagia, stricture, hypocalcaemia/hypoparathyroidism, hypothyroidism, chyle leak, shoulder weakness, lymphedema, and carotid rupture are examples. This system cannot address these specific issues at present, although modification of the standard NSQIP data acquisition protocol could be done to capture diseasespecific information in the future. In addition, NSQIP total, as in our study, is a much more appropriate measure of the overall magnitude of a given operation. Our findings further support the relationship between increasing surgical complexity with increased AE s in patients undergoing TL. There are a number of limitations to our study. The authors argue that while the number of cases is does not include patient tumor characteristics. Initial TNM staging is not included, although disseminated disease represents M stage. The location of the primary tumor (larynx, hypopharynx, or oropharynx) is also not included. Finally, information on race/ethnicity, primary payer status, or level of education is not included in NSQIP. Other authors have shown that the decision of surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for laryngeal cancer www.openaccesspub.org JOA CC-license DOI : 10.14302/issn.2379-8572.joa-14-429 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 19

was not related to comoridity, insurance status, or race/ ethnicity. However, those with a higher level of education were more likely to undergo chemoradiation than laryngectomy. 17 Regardless of these limitations, our study provides valuable insights into the treatment of patients undergoing TL. Conclusions Our analysis of total laryngectomies in the NSQIP database has a number of findings. Increased anesthesia time is the only factor significantly associated with all 3 categories of complications (medical complications, surgical complications, and reoperation). Overall, medical complications are much more common than surgical complications. Several factors were significantly related Ethical Approval: De-identified patient information is freely available to all institutional members who comply with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Data Use Agreement. The Data Use Agreement implements the protections afforded by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Disclaimer: The NSQIP and the hospitals participating in the NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not been verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis, or the conclusions derived by the authors of this study. to medical complications, including age, prior PCI, disseminated cancer, steroid use, weight loss, total RVU, and prolonged anesthesia time. The use of the NSQIP dataset may be imperfect, as pertinent details of chemotherapy and radiation are not included. In spite of this, our findings provide data for improved patient care, and suggest directions for a laryngectomy-specific outcomes database. Financial Support: This particular research received no internal or external grant funding. Conflicts of Interest: The authors report no relevant financial disclosures related to this current work. References 1. Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349 (22): 2091-2098. 2. Chen AY, Matson LK, Roberts D, Goepfert H. The significance of comorbidity in advanced laryngeal cancer. Head Neck. 2001 Jul; 23(7): 566-72. 3. Hoffman HT, McCulloch T, Gustin D, et al. Organ preservation therapy for advanced-stage laryngeal carcinoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1997;30 (1):113-30 4. Gourin CG, Frick KD. National Trends in Laryngeal Cancer Surgery and the Effect of Surgeon and www.openaccesspub.org JOA CC-license DOI : 10.14302/issn.2379-8572.joa-14-429 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 20

Hospital Volume on Short-Term Outcomes and Cost of Care. Laryngoscope. 2012; 122: 88-94. 5. Weber RS, Berkey BA, Forasteiere A, et al. Outcome of salvage total laryngectomy folloing organ preservation therapy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:44-49. 6. Ganly I, Patel S, Matsuo J, et al. Postoperative Complications of Salvage Total Laryngectomy. Cancer. 2005; 103:2073-81. 7. Schwartz SR, Yeuh B, Maynard C, et al. Predictors of wound complications after laryngectomy: A study of over 2000 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 131: 61-8. 8. Withrow KP, Rosenthal EL, Gourin CG, et al. Free tissue transfer to manage salvage laryngectomy defects after organ preservation failure. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(5):781-4. 9. Paydarfar JA, Birkmeyer NJ. Complications in head and neck surgery: a meta-analysis of postlaryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistula. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;132(1):67-72. 10. Herranz J, Sarandeses A, Fernandez MF, Barro CV, Vidal JM, Gavilan J. Complications after laryngectomy in nonradiated laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Otolaryngol head Neck Surg. 2000;122:892-898. 11. Lavelle RJ, Maw AR. The aetiology of postlaryngectomy haryngocutaenous fistula. J Laryngol Otol. 1972;86:785-793. 12. Shemen LJ, Spiro RH. Complications following 13. American College of Surgeons. American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program User Guide for the 2011 Participant Use File [NSQIP Online User Guide]. Available at: http:// site.acsnsqip.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/2011 -User-Guide_Final.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2013 14. Henderson WG, Daley J. Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is? Am J Surg. 2009; 198:S19-27 15. Hammermeister K. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: learning from the past and moving to the future. Am J Surg. 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S69-73 16. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med 2010; 363:2477-2481. 17. Zhu J, Fedea S, Chen AY. The impact of Comorbidity on Treatment (Chemoradiation and Laryngectomy) of Advanced, Nondistant Metastatic Laryngeal Cancer. A Review of 18,849 Cases From the National Cancer Database (203-2008). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 138(12): 1120-1128. 18. Cory JP, Calderelli DD, Hutchinson JC Jr., et al. Surgical complications in patients with head and neck cancer receving chemotherapy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:437-439. 19. Henderson WG, Daley J. Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is? Am J Surg. 2009 Nov;198(5 Suppl):S19-27. laryngectomy. Head Neck Surg. 1986;8:185-191. www.openaccesspub.org JOA CC-license DOI : 10.14302/issn.2379-8572.joa-14-429 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 21