Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Similar documents
Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): Statistical Methods:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

UMEC/VI vs. UMEC in subjects who responded to UMEC UMEC/VI vs. VI in subjects who responded to VI

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Study No: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives : Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Efficacy Study of Zoledronic Acid and Teriparatide Combination Therapy in Women With Osteoporosis

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Co-Primary Outcomes/Efficacy Variables:

Study No.: SFCA3007 Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the DISKUS

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: LOV Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary-

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, parallel-group study.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

2.1 Numerator: The number of denominator continuous inpatient spells (i.e. spells excluding those with a diagnosis

Sponsor Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Full Novartis CTRD Results Template

Blood Eosinophils and Response to Maintenance COPD Treatment: Data from the FLAME Trial. Online Data Supplement

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: ADF Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Figure 1: Consort diagram; the status of participants in the study

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: TAG IDAG Objectives:

Episodes of Care Risk Adjustment

Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):

ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: 10/11/2013. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: 49653/020 Title: A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

The population of subjects which was statistically analyzed was the Intent-to-Treat population

Premium Specialty: Pediatrics

Study No.: SAM40012 Title: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group comparison of three treatments : 1)

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

Supplementary appendix

Sponsor. Novartis. Generic Drug Name. Vildagliptin. Therapeutic Area of Trial. Type 2 diabetes. Approved Indication. Type 2 diabetes.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome:

mg 25 mg mg 25 mg mg 100 mg 1

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variables:

regimens. Data may differ from published or presented data and are limited information provided here. The results from a single trial need

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Isle of Wight Joint Strategic Needs Assessment: Core Dataset 2009

Essential Shared Care Agreement Drugs for Dementia

Study No Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No: Title: Rationale: . Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-516, NCT#

Archived SECTION 18 - DIAGNOSIS CODES. Section 18 - Diagnosis Codes 18.1 GENERAL INFORMATION PRIOR CONTENTS NO LONGER APPLICABLE...

ENROLLMENT : Line of Business Summary

SYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers).

Comorbidity or medical history Existing diagnoses between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2011 AF management care AF symptoms Tachycardia

Analysis of immunogenicity

Common Codes for ICD-10

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

High Claims Payments Hits Record High of $3.8 billion in 2011.

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Supplementary Online Content

Essential Shared Care Agreement Drugs for Dementia

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Comorbidities Network

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Study vaccines Objectives:

Appendix Criteria used for the automated chart review

Evidence Summary to support COPD formulary decision making and guideline development

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England

The AMBAR trial: an interim analysis ASFA Annual Meeting May 6, Palm Springs. CA. Antonio Páez, MD Senior Manager, Clinical Operations Grifols

Supplemental Appendix. 1. Protocol Definition of Sustained Virologic Response. A patient has a sustained virologic response if:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

TENNCARE Bundled Payment Initiative: Description of Bundle Risk Adjustment for Wave 8 Episodes

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Annual High Claims Survey. Year Ending 31 December 2016

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Medical Directive. Activation Date: April 24, 2013 Review due by: December 1, Medical Director: Date: December 1, 2017

Soleus 75 (6 ml) 0 (6 ml) 75 (6 ml. Tibialis posterior 75 (6 ml) 0 (6 ml) 75 (6 ml) Total 300 (24 ml) 0 (24 ml) 300 (24 ml) Dose: U (solution volume)

Transcription:

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product. Before prescribing any product mentioned in this Register, healthcare professionals should consult prescribing information for the product approved in their country. Study No.: SB207499/157 Title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Oral Cilomilast (15 mg bd) When Given as Maintenance Treatment for 12 Months to Subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Rationale: This study was designed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of cilomilast versus placebo in subjects with COPD. Phase: III Study Period: 01 November 2001 to 09 January 2004 Study Design: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study Centres: 137 centres from 18 countries Indication: COPD Treatment: Subjects who fulfilled the randomisation criteria received either cilomilast 15mg or matching placebo bd. One tablet of study medication was taken twice daily, in the morning immediately after breakfast and in the evening immediately after a meal. Objectives: The primary objective of the study was to assess the clinical efficacy of oral cilomilast 15mg bd as maintenance treatment for subjects with COPD. This was demonstrated over a 52-week treatment period in subjects with COPD who were poorly reversible to bronchodilators by assessment of reduction in the risk of the occurrence of exacerbations of COPD for subjects treated with cilomilast 15mg bd compared with placebo and assessment of superiority of pulmonary function data (FEV 1) for subjects treated with cilomilast 15mg bd compared with placebo. Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: There were two primary efficacy endpoints; mean change from baseline in trough pre-bronchodilator FEV 1 averaged over 52 weeks, and the incidence rate of level II (moderate) and level III (severe) COPD exacerbations during the treatment period. Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): Secondary measures of efficacy were mean change from baseline in trough post-bronchodilator FEV 1 averaged over 52 weeks, time to first level II (moderate) or level III (severe) COPD exacerbation, time to first COPD exacerbation (all levels), exacerbation incidence for all levels of COPD exacerbations, and quality of life as determined using the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Statistical Methods: The planned sample size was 800 subjects to obtain 550 evaluable subjects. The sample size would have greater than 90% power at a significance level of 0.05 to detect a difference of 50mL in FEV 1 in the change from baseline, assuming a standard deviation of 210mL, and a 30% reduction in exacerbation rate for cilomilast group compared with placebo group, assuming a Poisson distribution for the number of COPD exacerbations (moderate and/or severe) during the treatment period and an exacerbation incidence of 0.8 per patient per year for the placebo group. As both FEV 1 and exacerbation incidence were required to be positive in this study no multiplicity adjustment was performed for the primary analyses. The primary assessment of FEV 1 was based on a repeated measures model with fixed effects of treatment, time and country. A compound symmetric correlation structure was used. Least squares means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each treatment group and treatment difference. Differences between treatment groups were assessed using t-tests on the least squares means. The primary COPD exacerbation analysis used a maximum likelihood based analysis, assuming a Poisson distribution, with total duration on treatment as an offset variable. Analyses of FEV 1 included the Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population, composed of all subjects who received at least one dose of double-blind medication and had a baseline and at least one on-therapy FEV 1 assessment. Analysis of exacerbation data and safety analyses included all randomized subjects. Study Population: Male or female between 40-80 years old; clinical diagnosis of COPD as 1

defined by GOLD guidelines (2000); smoking history of 10 or more pack years; pre-bronchodilator FEV 1 to FVC ratio less than or equal to 0.7 at screening; poor reversibility of airway obstruction, defined by less than or equal to 10% of predicted normal or less than or equal to 200mL (or both) increase in FEV 1 after administration of salbutamol 400mcg via MDI at screening; post-salbutamol FEV 1 of between 30%-70% predicted normal at screening Number of Subjects: Planned, N 400 400 Randomised, N 452 455 Completed, n (%) 331 (73) 288 (63) Total Number Subjects Withdrawn, N (%) 121 (27) 167 (37) Withdrawn due to Adverse Events n (%) 46 (10) 80 (18) Withdrawn due to Lack of Efficacy n (%) 18 (4) 8 (2) Withdrawn for other reasons n (%) 57 (13) 79 (17) Demographics N (ITT) 452 455 Females: Males 122:330 98:357 Mean Age, years (SD) 63.3 (8.9) 64.6 (8.7) Caucasian, n (%) 433 (96) 436 (96) Current smoker, n (%) 188 (42) 196 (43) Primary Efficacy Results: Change from Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV 1 (L) Averaged Over 52 Weeks N 416 395 Baseline mean 1.42 1.34 LS mean change from baseline (SE) -0.047 (0.009) -0.006 (0.009) LS mean difference versus placebo 0.041 95% confidence interval versus placebo (0.019, 0.063) p-value versus placebo <0.001 Incidence Rate of Level 2/Level 3 COPD Exacerbations N 437 442 Per patient per year rate of incidence 0.448 0.483 Incidence density ratio (Cilomilast v placebo) 1.078 95% confidence interval, density ratio (0.827, 1.405) p-value versus placebo 0.580 Secondary Outcome Variable(s): Change from Baseline in Post-bronchodilator FEV 1 (L) Averaged Over 52 Weeks N 411 390 Baseline mean (SE) 1.42 1.33 LS mean change from baseline (SE) -0.002 (0.009) 0.032 (0.010) LS mean difference versus placebo 0.034 95% confidence interval versus placebo (0.011, 0.057) Incidence Rate of All COPD Exacerbations N 437 442 Per patient per year rate of incidence 0.909 0.867 Incidence density ratio (Cilomilast v placebo) 0.954 95% confidence interval, density ratio (0.775, 1.173) 2

Level 2/Level 3 Exacerbation-free Survival at 52 Weeks N 452 455 Subjects exacerbation free, n (%) 318 (69.6) 329 (68.4) 95% confidence interval (65.0, 74.2) (63.5, 73.3) Exacerbation-free Survival at 52 Weeks N 452 455 Subjects exacerbation free, n (%) 240 (50.7) 263 (51.2) 95% confidence interval (45.7, 55.7) (46.0, 56.5) Change from Baseline in SGRQ Averaged Over 52 Weeks N 369 347 Baseline mean (SE) 39.2 (0.99) 39.4 (1.02) LS mean change from baseline (SE) -1.49 (0.75) -1.29 (0.80) LS mean difference versus placebo 0.20 95% confidence interval versus placebo (-1.70, 2.10) Safety Results: An on-therapy adverse event (AE) was defined as an AE with onset on or after the start date of study medication but not later than one day after the last date of study medication. An on-therapy serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as an SAE with onset on or after the start date of study medication and up to 30 days after the last dose of medication. Most Frequent Adverse Events On-Therapy n (%) n (%) Subjects with any AE(s), n(%) 343 (76) 351 (77) Exacerbation of COPD 209 (46) 191 (42) Nausea 14 (3) 44 (10) Nasopharyngitis 54 (12) 43 (9) Headache 22 (5) 35 (8) Diarrhoea 13 (3) 33 (7) Vomiting 8 (2) 21 (5) Anorexia 1 (<1) 18 (4) Dyspepsia 6 (1) 18 (4) Cough 11 (2) 14 (3) Influenza 17 (4) 14 (3) Abdominal pain upper 5 (1) 13 (3) Dizziness 5 (1) 13 (3) Serious Adverse Events - On-Therapy n (%) [n considered by the investigator to be related to study medication] n (%) [related] n (%) [related] Subjects with any SAE(s), n(%) 55 (12) [0] 53 (12) [5] Chronic obstructive airways disease exacerbated 18 (4) 19 (4) Atrial fibrillation 1 (<1) 3 (<1) Atrial flutter 0 2 (<1) Duodenal ulcer 0 2 (<1) [1] Coronary artery disease 1 (<1) 2 (<1) Myocardial ischaemia 2 (<1) 2 (<1) Pneumonia 2 (<1) 2 (<1) Myocardial infarction 1 (<1) 1 (<1) Ileus 1 (<1) 1 (<1) Lung neoplasm malignant 1 (<1) 1 (<1) Syncope 2 (<1) 1 (<1) Tachycardia 2 (<1) 0 3

Acute myocardial infarction 0 1 (<1) Acute respiratory failure 0 1 (<1) Alcohol poisoning 1 (<1) 0 Anaphylactic shock 1 (<1) 0 Angina pectoris 0 1 (<1) Angina unstable 1 (<1) 0 Aortic aneurysm 0 1 (<1) Aortic dissection 0 1 (<1) Basal cell carcinoma 1 (<1) 0 Bladder cancer 0 1 (<1) Blood in stool 0 1 (<1) Bradyarrhythmia 0 1 (<1) Bronchopneumonia 1 (<1) 0 Calculus bladder 1 (<1) 0 Cardiac failure 0 1 (<1) Cardiac failure acute 0 1 (<1) Carpal tunnel syndrome 1 (<1) 0 Cataract 1 (<1) 0 Cerebral thrombosis 1 (<1) 0 Cerebrovascular accident 1 (<1) 0 Chest pain 1 (<1) 0 Cholelithiasis 0 1 (<1) Colonic haemorrhage 0 1 (<1) Convulsion 0 1 (<1) Depression 1 (<1) 0 Dermatitis medicamentosa 1 (<1) 0 Diarrhoea 0 1 (<1) [1] Diverticulum 0 1 (<1) Dyspnoea 0 1 (<1) Encephalopathy 1 (<1) 0 Epididymitis 0 1 (<1) Gastritis 0 1 (<1) [1] Gastric cancer 1 (<1) 0 Gastroenteritis 1 (<1) 0 Headache 0 1 (<1) Herpes zoster 1 (<1) 0 Hip fracture 1 (<1) 0 Hypersensitivity 1 (<1) 0 Inguinal hernia 0 1 (<1) Intestinal obstruction 1 (<1) 0 Intestinal perforation 1 (<1) 0 Iron deficiency anaemia 1 (<1) 0 Lobar pneumonia 1 (<1) 0 Lumbar spinal stenosis 0 1 (<1) Mania 1 (<1) 0 Metastasis 1 (<1) 0 Neuropathy 1 (<1) 0 Pancreatitis 0 1 (<1) [1] Pneumonia bacterial 1 (<1) 0 Pneumothorax 1 (<1) 0 Prostate cancer 1 (<1) 0 Proteinuria 1 (<1) 0 4

Pulmonary fibrosis 1 (<1) 0 Reflux oesophagitis 0 1 (<1) [1] Renal cell carcinoma stage unspecified 1 (<1) 0 Respiratory alkalosis 0 1 (<1) Rib fracture 1 (<1) 0 Syncope vasovagal 1 (<1) 0 Thermal burn 1 (<1) 0 Thrombophlebitis 1 (<1) 0 Thyroid gland cancer 1 (<1) 0 Ventricular tachycardia 0 1 (<1) [1] Viral labyrithitis 1 (<1) 0 Subjects with fatal SAEs, n (%) 8 (2) [0] 4 (<1) [0] Myocardial infarction 2 (<1) 0 Acute myocardial infarction 0 1 (<1) Aortic aneurysm rupture 1 (<1) 0 Cardiac failure acute 0 1 (<1) Chronic obstructive airways disease exacerbated 1 (<1) 0 Coma 1 (<1) 0 Death 0 1 (<1) Gastric cancer 1 (<1) 0 Prostate cancer 1 (<1) 0 Pulmonary embolism 1 (<1) 0 Renal insufficiency 1 (<1) 0 Respiratory failure 0 1 (<1) Conclusion: Cilomilast was shown to have statistically significant effects on FEV 1 compared with placebo when administered at 15mg twice daily over a 52-week treatment period, but did not show statistically significant effects on exacerbation rates. In the placebo group 343 subjects reported adverse events with the most frequently reported being exacerbation of COPD and nasopharyngitis. In the cilomilast treated group 351 subjects reported adverse events with the most frequently reported being exacerbation of COPD and nausea. Fifty-five subjects in the placebo group and fifty-three subjects in the cilomilast group reported serious adverse events. Fatalities were reported for eight subjects in the placebo group and four subjects in the cilomilast group. Publications: No publication Date updated: 16-Jul-2008 5