Project 15 Test-Retest Reliability of Semi-quantitative Readings from Knee Radiographs

Similar documents
Central Reading of Knee X-rays for Kellgren & Lawrence Grade and Individual Radiographic Features of Tibiofemoral Knee OA

Table of Contents. Overview Introduction Variables Missing Data Image Type Time Points Reading Methods...

Non-commercial use only

Validity and Reliability of Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis Measures by Arthroplasty Surgeons

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 18 (2010) 1402e1407

Planning knee OA prevention studies in obese populations Lessons from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) and Osteoathritis Initiative (OAI)

the new accurate analysis and classification system of knee joint osteoarthritis

Radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis in a Czech cohort

Cristal Castellanos 1, Abelardo Camacho 2, Klaus Mieth 3, Gamal Zayed 3, German Carrillo 3, Oscar Rivero 4, Rafael Gómez 4, Sara Jaimes 4

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 18 (2010) 1393e1401

International Cartilage Repair Society

Longitudinal and Hierarchical Analytic Strategies for OAI Data

Assessment of primary hip osteoarthritis: comparison of radiographic methods using colon radiographs

kmri_qcart_eckstein_descrip 8/7/2017 1

NEW RADIOGRAPHIC GRADING SCALES FOR OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HAND

Quadriceps Muscle and Intermuscular Fat Volumes in the Thighs of Men in the OAI are Associated with Physical Function and Knee Pain

Physical activity, alignment and knee osteoarthritis: data from MOST and the OAI

Summary. Introduction

BRIEF REPORT. KENNETH D. BRANDT, ROSE S. FIFE, ETHAN M. BRAUNSTEIN, and BARRY KATZ. From the Department of Medicine, the Department of

Bony Phenotype: Worthwhile as a Therapeutic Target?

Review Article Quantitative Cartilage Imaging in Knee Osteoarthritis

Meniscus T2 Relaxation Time at Various Stages of Knee Joint Degeneration

DISCLOSURES. T. McAlindon: Samumed, grant/research support; Astellas, Flexion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samumed,and Seikugaku, consulting

OAI Data Users ACR Study Group

Title: THE NATURAL HISTORY OF RADIOGRAPHIC KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: A FOURTEEN YEAR POPULATION-BASED COHORT STUDY

Valgus Malalignment Is a Risk Factor for Lateral Knee Osteoarthritis Incidence and Progression

Medial Knee Osteoarthritis Precedes Medial Meniscal Posterior Root Tear with an Event of Painful Popping

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Radiographic assessment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the community: definitions and normal joint space

CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND RADIOLOGY QUIZ QUESTION

T he goals of medical management of patients with

International Cartilage Repair Society

Roy H. Lidtke Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, Section of Rheumatology Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Structural predictors of response to intra-articular steroid injection in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis

unchanged; and the proportion with severe decreased from 7% to 4%; the proportion with mild pain decreased (48% to 32%;

Joint Space Width Criteria Can Reduce Knee Osteoarthritis Trial Heterogeneity: Phase 2 Post-Hoc Data from Wnt Pathway Inhibitor, SM04690

MY PATIENT HAS KNEE PAIN. David Levi, MD Chief, Division of Musculoskeletal l limaging Atlantic Medical Imaging

Radiographic Osteoarthritis and Serum Triglycerides

Clinical Study Relationships between Pain, Function and Radiographic Findings in Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Cross-Sectional Study

Primary osteoathrosis of the hip and Heberden's nodes

Case 27 Clinical Presentation

A rapid, novel method of volumetric assessment of MRI-detected subchondral bone marrow lesions in knee osteoarthritis

One hundred and ten individuals participated in this study

O steoarthritis (OA) of the hip is of particular interest as

The Role of Surgery in Early Osteoarthritis of the Knee. In partial fulfillment for the requirement of the degree of Doctor of.

Computed tomography for the detection of thumb base osteoarthritis, comparison with digital radiography.

Abramsohn Retractor 1

Protocol. This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

International Cartilage Repair Society

MRI software measurement of osteophyte volume in knee osteoarthritis: a longitudinal validation study

Sasaki E 1,2, Otsuka H 2, Sasaki N 2, and Ishibashi Y 1

OAI Ancillary Studies, Biospecimen Access and Application Procedures

ARTICLE IN PRESS. International Cartilage Repair Society

The Prevalence of Knee Osteoarthritis in Elderly Community Residents in Korea

Definition of osteoarthritis on MRI: results of a Delphi exercise

Analytic Strategies for the OAI Data

Imaging assessment of Unicomp candidates!

For Commercial products, please refer to the following policy: Preauthorization via Web-Based Tool for Procedures

Radiographic grading of the patellofemoral joint is more accurate in skyline compared to lateral views

Association of Squatting With Increased Prevalence of Radiographic Tibiofemoral Knee Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 18 (2010)

ARTHROPATHY IN LONG-TERM CURED ACROMEGALY IS CHARACTERIZED BY OSTEOPHYTES WITHOUT JOINT-SPACE NARROWING: A COMPARISON WITH GENERALIZED OSTEOARTHRITIS.

Original article RHEUMATOLOGY

Meniscal Surgery: Risk of Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing Progression and Subsequent Knee Replacement Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative 1

Question Sheet. Prospective Validation of the Pediatric Appendicitis Score in a Canadian Pediatric Emergency Department

O steoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent form of

Ampion TM. Management Presentation 2018

Is Weight Loss an Effective Treatment of Pain Symptoms Related to Knee Joint Osteoarthritis in Obese Adults?

Outcome of Treatment of Osteoarthritis with Arthroscopic Debridement and Autologous Conditioned Plasma

VARIABILITY OF THE POSTERIOR CONDYLAR ANGLE

The Relationship Between Cartilage Loss on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Radiographic Progression in Men and Women With Knee Osteoarthritis

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Ann Rheum Dis. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 November 18.

F. Birrell 1,3, M. Lunt 1, G. Macfarlane 2 and A. Silman 1

RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRESSION

Significant Clinical Symptoms and Signs in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients: Relation to a Diagnosis of Knee Osteoarthritis

In vivo diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of articular cartilage as a biomarker for osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 20 (2012) 997e1003

Changing EDSS progression in placebo cohorts in relapsing MS:

Distribution of Finger Nodes and Their Association With Underlying Radiographic Features of Osteoarthritis

Prevention of knee osteoarthritis in overweight females; the first preventive randomized

To evaluate the role of high resolution ultrasonography in diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis

ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION. Natural History of Knee Cartilage Defects and Factors Affecting Change

A review of statistical methods in the analysis of data arising from observer reliability studies (Part 11) *

To study the efficacy of Rhus tox in management of cases of osteoarthritis of knee joint

ARD Online First, published on October 11, 2005 as /ard

Epidemiology of meniscus position: associations with knee symptoms and osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 18 (2010) 1275e1283

Chopstick Arthropathy

New Directions in Osteoarthritis Research

International Cartilage Repair Society

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (1998) 6, Osteoarthritis Research Society /98/ $12.00/0 Article No.

Christopher J. Swearingen, Sarah Kennedy, Jeyanesh R.S. Tambiah. Samumed LLC, San Diego, CA, USA

The knees and ankles in sport and veteran military parachutists

Quantification of Biomechanical Imaging Biomarkers. Sudhakar Tummala

Volume 107, Number 6 cluded as an imaging option in the original RDC/ TMD, it has been recommended as a screening tool for TMJ pathology.3-5 With the

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS (OA) IS A

Studies of high or moderate quality used for results and conclusions in the present report

The Association of Meniscal Pathologic Changes With Cartilage Loss in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Quantifying Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis Severity using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

Transcription:

Project 15 Test-Retest Reliability of Semi-quantitative Readings from Knee Radiographs 1. SAS dataset... 1 2. Purpose and methods... 1 2.1 Background... 1 2.2 Reliability at single time points... 1 2.3 Longitudinal reliability... 2 3. Results... 2 4. References... 3 5. Tables... 4 1. SAS dataset Name: kxr_sq_rel_buxx (xx identifies the time point) Display label: kxr SQ reliability readings (BU) 2. Purpose and methods 2.1 Background Project 15 (ARRA Radiologic Outcomes for the OAI) consists of semi-quantitative readings of knee radiographs done at the Boston University under the direction of Dr. David Felson. To evaluate test-retest reliability the complete set of films (all time points) of 150 participants were sent by the Coordinating Center to the reading center after the original readings were completed. The reading center was blinded to the fact that these were retest readings and blinded to the original scores of the readings. The sample was representative of the entire cohort with respect to the grades of OA, radiographic progression and incidence and number of time points with radiographs for a participant. The reading protocols for the first and second readings were the same, including the initial screening, or triage, reading, identification of discrepancies and adjudication procedures. The first and second sets of measurements were separated by 3 to 9 months. Both original and retest readings are included in the kxr_sq_rel_buxx datasets, and are denoted by their project number in the READPRJ variable. Records with READPRJ=19A are the original readings (which can also be found in the kxr_sq_buxx datasets that contain all the original Project 15 ARRA data), and records with READPPRJ=19B are the retest readings. Project 19B data replace the reliability data previously released (Project 14). 2.2 Reliability at single time points To test reliability at each time point we evaluated each reading variable by creating a cross tabulation of the variable from the two readings (2 knees per participant). Simple kappa coefficients were used to evaluate agreement between the two readings when the variable was dichotomous. Weighted kappa coefficients were used if the variable had more than two ordinal categories. The kappa coefficient is a measure of agreement (Sim and Wright 2005); a value >0 indicates that the agreement observed is greater than that expected by chance and a value of 1.0 indicates perfect agreement. We do not include results for several OA features that did not have sufficient observations with values scored >0 to yield valid results. We also created several calculated dichotomous variables for the presence/absence of a feature and the severity of a feature and evaluated their agreement as described above. The calculated variables are included in the reliability analysis but are not included in the released dataset. For all single time point joint space narrowing (JSN) variables, if the JSN score was a non-integer value (e.g. x.3, x.6, x.9) we rounded that value down to the closest integer. kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 1

2.3 Longitudinal reliability For longitudinal reliability we performed the following analyses. We compared the results of the initial screening (or triage) reading which determined whether the longitudinal readings included just the K-L grades and JSN (subjects who were screened negative for having K-L grade 2 in either knee at any time point) or included K-L grades, JSN and all other individual radiographic features (subjects who were screened positive for having K-L grade 2 in at least one knee at one or more time points). For the two different definitions of incident radiographic knee OA (see section 2.4a in the written documentation that accompanies the kxr_sq_bu_xx datasets, http://oai.epi-ucsf.org/datarelease/sasdocs/kxr_sq_bu_descrip.pdf) we first compared the two readings for whether a knee was eligible for incidence, which for both definitions required that the knee have K-L grade of 0 or 1 at. For incident OA using each definitions at a given follow-up time point, among those with reading data at that follow-up visit we first compared the overall classification of the knee (eligible for incident OA at but no incident OA during follow-up; incident OA during follow-up; prevalent OA at and not eligible for incident OA). Second, restricting the comparison to the knees that were classified as eligible for incident radiographic OA by both readings, we compared the classification for incident OA up that time point between readings. We also performed similar comparisons between readings for variables summarizing incident knee OA status across all time points in which we used the reading data from the last time point available and all earlier time points to classify a knee for incident OA. For progression of JSN, we analyzed medial and lateral JSN separately. Analyses included comparison between readings for whether there was any (progression) in JSN scores up to a given follow-up time point, counting within grade s in JSN as progression, among knees with reading data at that time point. We also summarized JSN s over all available time points in which we used the reading data from the last time point available and all earlier time points to classify a knee for JSN progression. 3. Results Cross-sectional reliability The kappa coefficients for OA features assessed on the and the 36 months radiographs are presented in Table 1 below. Tables 2 to 4 have examples of the cross tabulations between the reading scores for selected variables. The Kellgren-Lawrence grade and JSN variables had good agreement between the two readings, with kappa coefficient values of approximately 0.70 to 0.80 and 0.75 to 0.88, respectively. The osteophyte variables showed good, but slightly lower, agreement, with kappas ranging from 0.69 to 0.82. The sclerosis variables also had good but lower agreement, with kappas of 0.65 to 0.85 for the raw variables and 0.73 to 0.79 for a summary variable for the presence/absence sclerosis over all four regions scored. Agreement was good to excellent for presence/absence of choncrocalcinosis in each compartment, with kappas of 0.79 to 0.91. Agreement on whether any subchondral cysts were present was moderate, with kappas of 0.45 to 0.62. Agreement on test-retest readings of 12-, 24- and 48-month radiographs were very similar to that for and 36 months. Longitudinal reliability Longitudinal reliability results for incident radiographic knee OA and JSN progression are detailed in tables 5-21 in section 4. Few longitudinal studies have provided data on the reliability of either incidence or JSN progression, so these OAI data are somewhat unique. There was good to excellent agreement on radiographic knee OA status classifications that determined which longitudinal features were scored and whether a knee was eligible to be classified as developing incident OA during follow-up. Good to excellent agreement was also found for both definitions of incident OA among knees that were classified as eligible for incidence in both readings. Reliability for incidence tended to improve with d duration of follow-up. However, a greater number of knees were classified as eligible for incident OA on the first kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 2

reading compared to the second reading, suggesting that there was some shift in the application of the threshold for KL grade 2 and KL grade 2N that would affect the classification for incident OA. Reliability for JSN progression was good to excellent for both medial and lateral compartments. As with incidence, reliability tended to with longer follow-up times. 4. References 1. Sim, J and Wright, C. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy. Volume 85. Number 3. March 2005. kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 3

5. Tables Table 1: Agreement between first and second readings (Project 15) Variable Name Variable Label Kappa* (95%CI) Kappa* (95%CI) VxxXRKL BL/FU kxr reading (BU): Kellgren and Lawrence (grades 0-4) Baseline 36 month 0.70 (0.65-0.76) 0.78 (0.73-0.83) KL_OA KL_OA: VxxXRKL <2=0; VxxXRKL 2=1 0.70 (0.62-0.78) 0.80 (0.72-0.87) VxxXRJSL ANY JSNL VxxXRJSM ANY JSNM VxxXROSFL VxxXROSFM ANY FEMOST BL/FU kxr reading (BU): joint space narrowing (OARSI grades 0-3) lateral ANY JSNL: VxxXRJSL <1=0; VxxXRJSL 1=1 BL/FU kxr reading (BU): joint space narrowing (OARSI grades 0-3) medial ANY JSNM: VxxXRJSM <1=0; VxxXRJSM 1=1 BL/FU kxr reading (BU): osteophytes (OARSI grades 0-3) femur lateral BL/FU kxr reading (BU): osteophytes (OARSI grades 0-3) femur medial compartment ANY FEMOST: VxxXROSFL <1 and VxxXROSFM <1=0; VxxXROSFL 1 or VxxXROSFM 1=1 0.87 (0.76-0.98) 0.85 (0.76-0.94) 0.83 (0.70-0.96) 0.88 (0.77-0.98) 0.75 (0.68-0.81) 0.77 (0.71-0.83) 0.74 (0.66-0.82) 0.75 (0.67-0.83) 0.69 (0.60-0.79 0.73 (0.65-0.82) 0.73 (0.66-0.81) 0.82 (0.76-0.82) 0.78 (0.70-0.85) 0.81 (0.74-0.88) VxxXROSTL VxxXROSTM ANY TIBOST VxxXRSCFL VxxXRSCFM VxxXRSCTL VxxXRSCTM BL/FU kxr reading (BU): osteophytes (OARSI grades 0-3) tibia lateral compartment BL/FU kxr reading (BU): osteophytes (OARSI grades 0-3) tibia medial compartment ANY TIBOST: VxxXROSTL <1 and VxxXROSTM <1=0; VxxXROSTL 1 or VxxXROSTM 1=1 BL kxr reading (BU): sclerosis (OARSI grades 0-3) tibia lateral compartment BL/FU kxr reading (BU): sclerosis (OARSI grades 0-3) femur medial compartment BL kxr reading (BU): sclerosis (OARSI grades 0-3) tibia lateral compartment BL kxr reading (BU): sclerosis (OARSI grades 0-3) tibia medial compartment 0.70 (0.61-0.79) 0.71 (0.62-0.80) 0.69 (0.60-0.77) 0.73 (0.66-0.81) 0.71 (0.63-0.79) 0.74 (0.65-0.82) 0.67 (0.50-0.85) 0.79 (0.68-0.90) 0.68 (0.59-0.78) 0.79 (0.71-0.76) 0.65 (0.49-0.82) 0.85 (0.73-0.96) -- 0.76 (0.68-0.84) kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 4

Table 1: Agreement between first and second readings (Project 15) Variable Name Variable Label Kappa* (95%CI) Kappa* (95%CI) ANY SCLER ANY CYST VxxXRCHL VxxXRCHM ANY SCLER: VxxXRSCFL<1 and VxxXRSCFM<1 and VxxXRSCTL<1 and VxxXRSCTM<1 = 0; VxxXRSCFL 1 or VxxXRSCFM 1 or VxxXRSCTL 1 or VxxXRSCTM 1 = 1 ANY CYST: VxxXRCYFL<1 and VxxXRCYFM<1 and VxxXRCYTL<1 and VxxXRSCTM<1 = 0; VxxXRSCFL 1 or VxxXRSCFM 1 or VxxXRSCTL 1 or VxxXRSCTM 1 = 1 BL/FU kxr reading (BU): chondrocalcinosis (0-1) femur lateral compartment BL/FU kxr reading (BU): chondrocalcinosis (0-1) femur lateral compartment 0.73 (0.64-0.82) 0.79 (0.78-0.99) 0.62 (0.40-0.85) 0.45 (0.24-0.66) 0.85 (0.68-1.00) 0.89 (0.75-1.00) 0.79 (0.59-0.99) 0.91 (0.79-1.00) Table 2: Test-retest agreement between Kellgren and Lawrence grade (V00XRKL) at Indicates calculate variables used in this report that are not included in a released dataset * Simple kappa statistic for dichotomous variables, weighted kappas for variables with three or more ordinal categories kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 5

Table 2: Test-retest agreement between Kellgren and Lawrence grade (VxxXRKL) at the visit and 36 month visit for Project 15. Project 15 Baseline KLG Score Project 15 KLG Score 2 0 1 2 3 4 0 73 22 5 0 0 100 1 20 28 25 0 0 73 2 2 11 62 5 0 80 3 0 1 8 36 1 46 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 95 62 100 41 2 300 Kappa Coefficient = 0.70 (95%CI: 0.65-0.76) Project 15 36 Month KLG Score Project 15 36 Month KLG Score 2 0 1 2 3 4 0 53 10 3 0 0 66 1 9 18 7 1 0 35 2 3 10 75 6 0 94 3 0 1 13 39 0 53 4 0 0 0 3 9 12 65 39 98 49 9 260 Kappa Coefficient = 0.78 (95%CI: 0.73-0.83) kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 6

Table 3: Test-retest agreement between joint space narrowing lateral compartment (VxxXRJSL) at the visit and 36 month visit for Project 15. Project 15 Baseline JSN -L Project 15 Baseline JSN -L 0 1 2 3 0 278 3 0 0 281 1 2 7 0 0 9 2 1 0 9 0 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 281 10 9 0 300 Kappa Coefficient = 0.87 (95%CI: 0.76-0.98) Project 15 36 Month JSN -L Project 15 36 Month JSN -L 0 1 2 3 0 235 2 0 0 237 1 2 2 2 0 6 2 1 3 9 0 13 3 0 0 1 3 4 238 7 12 3 260 Kappa Coefficient = 0.85 (95%CI: 0.76-0.94) kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 7

Table 4: Test-retest agreement between joint space narrowing medial compartment (VxxXRJSM) at the visit and 36 month visit for Project 15. Project 15 Baseline JSN -M Project 15 Baseline JSN -M 0 1 2 3 0 170 10 0 0 180 1 27 50 5 0 82 2 0 9 27 1 37 3 0 0 0 1 1 197 69 32 2 300 Kappa Coefficient = 0.75 (95%CI: 0.68-0.81) Project 15 36 Month JSN -M Project 15 36 month JSN -M 0 1 2 3 0 141 8 0 0 149 1 22 35 5 0 62 2 1 10 30 0 41 3 0 0 2 6 8 164 53 37 6 260 Kappa Coefficient = 0.77 (95%CI: 0.71-0.84) kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 8

Table 5. Variable Screening reading for IRF scoring (0=KL 0-1 both knees all time points; 1=KL 2 either knee at any time point) Knee is eligible for incident OA at : 0=KL 2; 1=KL 0-1) Incident KL 2 OA in knees score, both readings (0=No; 1=Yes) Incident KL 2N OA in knees score K-L 0-1 at, both readings (0=No; 1=Yes) Medial JSN progression: within grade from in knees with followup at each time point (0=No; 1=Yes) Lateral JSN progression: within grade from in knees with followup at each time point (0=No; 1=Yes) Medial JSN progression severity (0=None; 1=within-grade only; 2= full grade or more)*** Lateral JSN progression severity (0=None; 1=within-grade only; 2= full grade or more)*** Kappa* (95%CI) Baseline 0.79 (0.66 0.91) 0.71 (0.62 0.79) Kappa* (95%CI) Kappa* (95%CI) Kappa* (95%CI) Kappa* (95%CI) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 12 month 24 month 36 month 48 month At any** time point 0.64 (0.38 0.91) 0.70 (0.60 0.95) 0.64 (0.48 0.79) 0.39 (0.1 0.78) 0.60 (0.37 0.84) 0.80 (0.66 0.94) 0.67 (0.54 0.79) 0.73 (0.54 0.92) 0.76 (0.61 0.91) 0.76 (0.61 091) 0.75 (0.63 0.86) 0.74 (0.56 0.91) 0.82 (0.69 0.96) 0.82 (0.70 0.94) 0.78 (0.68 0.88) 0.85 (0.70 0.99) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.71 (0.55 0.87) 0.81 (0.70 0.92) 0.72 (0.63 0.82) 0.83 (0.70 0.96) 0.71 (0.62 0.80) 0.79 (0.64 0.93) Calculated variables used in this table are not included in a released dataset. * Simple kappa statistic for dichotomous variables, weighted kappas for variables with three or more ordinal categories. ** Cumulative changes, with last available time point carried forward. ***For 3 level progression severity variable, the greatest at any time point is used to classify the knee. kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 9

Table 6. Screening reading: K-L grade 2 in either knee at any time point (Yes/No) (Subjects screened negative were read for K-L grade and JSN scores in both knees at all time points. Subjects screened positive had K-L grade, JSN and all other IRFs at each time point.) K-L grade at any time point N Y N 24 3 27 Y 7 116 123 31 119 150 Kappa Coefficient = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.66 0.91) Table 7. Knee is eligible at for incident OA during follow-up: K-L grade 0-1 (eligible) vs K-L grade 2 (not eligible) K-L grade at 0-1 2-4 0-1 143 30 173 2-4 14 113 127 157 143 300 Kappa Coefficient = 0.71 (95% CI: 0.62 0.79) kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 10

Table 8. Incident knee OA by 24 months, K-L grade 2 definition: knee is KL 0-1 at and K-L grade 2 by 24 months or an earlier time point Incident knee OA by 24 mo: K-L 2 K-L 2 at 109 1 19 129 8 8 9 25 K-L 2 at 10 2 110 122 127 11 138 276 Overall Kappa Coefficient = 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61 0. 76) Overall Weighted Kappa Coefficient = 0.72 Kappa Coefficient for knees eligible for incident OA by both readings (shaded cells = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.84) Table 9. by 24 months, K-L grade 2N definition: knee is KL 0-1 at and K-L grade 2N by 24 months or an earlier time point, in knees with reading data at 48 months. Incident knee OA by 24 mo: K-L 2N K-L 2 at 99 4 13 116 5 18 15 38 K-L 2 at 9 3 110 122 113 25 138 276 Overall Kappa Coefficient = 0.70 (95%CI: 0.63 0.78) Overall Weighted Kappa Coefficient = 0.74 Kappa Coefficient for knees eligible for incident OA by both readings (shaded cells) = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.94) kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 11

Table 10. by 48 months, K-L grade 2 definition: knee is KL 0-1 at and K-L grade 2 by 48 months or an earlier time point, in knees with reading data at 48 months. Incident knee OA by 48m: K-L 2 K-L 2 at 84 1 16 101 5 12 7 24 K-L 2 at 8 3 96 107 97 16 119 232 Overall Kappa Coefficient = 0.70 (95% CI: 0.62 0.78) Overall Weighted Kappa Coefficient = 0.72 Kappa for knees eligible for incident OA by both readings (shaded cells) = 0.82 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.96) Table 11. by 48 months, K-L grade 2N definition: knee is KL 0-1 at and K-L grade 2N by 48 months or earlier time point, in knees with reading data at 48 months. Incident knee OA by 48 mo: K-L 2N K-L 2 at 66 1 7 74 7 28 16 51 K-L 2 at 7 4 96 107 80 33 119 232 Overall kappa Coefficient = 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63 0.79) Overall weighted kappa Coefficient = 0.75 Kappa Coefficient for knees eligible for incident OA by both readings (shaded cells) = 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.94) kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 12

Table 12. by 48 months, K-L grade 2 definition: knee is KL 0-1 at and K-L grade 2 by the last time point with reading data or an earlier time point Incident knee OA at any time point: K-L 2 K-L 2 at 112 1 16 129 10 17 14 41 K-L 2 at 11 4 113 128 133 22 143 298 Overall kappa Coefficient = 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61 0.75) Overall weighted kappa Coefficient = 0.72 Kappa Coefficient for knees eligible for incident OA by both readings (shaded cells) = 0.71 (95%CI: 0.55, 0.87) Table 13. by 24 months, K-L grade 2N definition: knee is KL 0-1 at and K-L grade 2N by the last time point with reading data or an earlier time point Incident knee OA at any time point: K-L 2N K-L 2 at 94 1 6 101 10 35 24 69 K-L 2 at 9 6 113 128 113 42 143 298 Overall kappa Coefficient = 0.70 (95% CI: 0.64 0.77) Overall weighted kappa Coefficient = 0.75 Kappa Coefficient for knees eligible for incident OA by both readings (shaded cells) = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.92) kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 13

Table 14. Medial JSN progression by 24 months: Any in JSN grade (within grade or full grade) from to 24 months in knees with reading data at 24 months Medial JSN by 24 months No change JSN 226 9 235 JSN 14 29 43 240 38 278 Kappa Coefficient = 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54 0.79) Table 15. Lateral JSN progression by 24 months: Any in JSN grade (within grade or full grade) from to 24 months in knees with reading data at 24 months Lateral JSN by 24 months No change JSN 261 2 263 JSN 5 10 15 266 12 278 Kappa Coefficient = 0.73 (95% CI: 0.54 0.92) kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 14

Table 16. Medial JSN progression by 48 months: Any in JSN grade (within grade or full grade) from to 48 months in knees with reading data at 48 months Medial JSN by 48 months No change JSN 173 6 179 JSN 12 43 55 185 49 234 Kappa Coefficient = 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68 0.87) Table 17. Lateral JSN progression by 48 months: Any in JSN grade (within grade or full grade) from to 48 months in knees with reading data at 48 months Lateral JSN by 48 months No change JSN 218 2 220 JSN 2 12 14 220 14 234 Kappa Coefficient = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.70 0.99) kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 15

Table 18. Medial JSN progression at any time point: Any in JSN grade (within grade or full grade) from to the last time point with reading data or an earlier time point Medial JSN at any time point No change JSN 218 10 228 JSN 19 53 72 237 63 300 Kappa Coefficient = 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63 0.82) Table 19. Lateral JSN progression at any time point: Any in JSN grade (within grade or full grade) from to the last time point with reading data or an earlier time point Lateral JSN at any time point No change JSN 278 3 281 JSN 3 16 19 281 19 300 Kappa Coefficient = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70 0.96) kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 16

Table 20. Medial JSN progression (no change, within grade or full grade) at any time point: Greatest in JSN grade (within grade or full grade) from to the last time point with reading data or an earlier time point Medial JSN at any time point No change Withingrade full grade 218 4 6 228 Within grade full grade 7 5 4 16 12 5 39 56 237 14 49 300 Weighted kappa Coefficient = 0.71 (95% CI: 0.62 0.80) Table 21. Lateral JSN progression (no change, within grade or full grade) at any time point: Greatest in JSN grade (within grade or full grade) from to the last time point with reading data or an earlier time point Medial JSN at any time point No change Withingrade full grade 278 0 3 281 Within grade full grade 1 4 0 5 2 2 10 14 281 6 13 300 Weighted Kappa Coefficient = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.64 0.93) kxr_sq_rel_bu_descrip 11/22/2016 17