CATION-EXCHANGE CHARACTERISTICS OF WHEAT, BARLEY AND PEA DEPENDING ON THE OSMOTIC PRESSURE IN NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS OF LOW ph

Similar documents
UPTAKE OF MAJOR AND TRACE ELEMENTS BY GRASS BIOMASS AFTER AMELIORATION OF DEGRADED SOIL

Understanding a Soil Report

FACT SHEET. Understanding Cation Exchange Capacity and % Base Saturation

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Effect of salinity on Cd and Zn availability

Trends in Soil Management for Turf. David C. Smith P.Ag DCS Agronomic Services

Understanding ph management and plant nutrition Part 3: Fertilizers

Plant Nutrients in Mineral Soils

FACTORS AFFECTING WATER QUALITY

Salts and Chlorides Remediation

ELEMENTAL BIOAVAILIBILITY IN NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS IN RELATION TO PRECIPITATION REACTIONS

Agronomy 365 Exam I Spring 2002

Understanding your results Acidity... 3 Aluminium... 3 Base saturation... 3 Boron... 4 Bulk density... 4 Calcium... 4 Cations...

COMPUTATION & PREPARATION OF NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS. Principles, properties & preparation of nutrient solutions

Determination of Calcium in Milk

For nmental. Written By: Agustin o, Professor. Developed in. and justice for all. Department of. funded by activities. )

Lecture 32: Soil Phosphorus and Cation Nutrients

Essential Elements. Original research don by Julius von Sachs 1860 using hydroponics

Soil Composition. Air

SOIL TEST INTERPRETATION JIM FASCHING Technical Field Representative

Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium deficiency on the uptake and mobilization of ions in Bengal gram (Cicer arietinum)

Chapter 1: Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management

Welcome. Greg Patterson C.C.A. President A&L Canada Laboratories

Importance of fertigation scheduling

DAFFODILS ARE WHAT THEY EAT: NUTRITIONAL ASPECTS OF SOILS

By Andrew & Erin Oxford, Bethel

Interpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations

Focus on Calcium Its role in crop production

THE EFFECT OF RENI PRODUCTS ON ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY OF NITROGEN METABOLISM IN GARDEN PEAS

MAGNESIUM BIOL 695. Chapter 12 MENGEL et al, 5th Ed. SOIL Mg. Mg soil content. Mg present in easily weatherable minerals. Sand 0.05% Clay 0.

FROM SOIL ELEMENTS TO FOOD NUTRIENTS: Joyce Kinabo Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Sokoine University, Tanzania

Principles of Orchard Nutrition. Kevin Manning and Ross Wilson AgFirst

EXTREME Chelates Macro and Micronutrients

SOILS AND PLANT NUTRITION

AgriCal by. Healthier Soils Stronger Plants Higher Yields

DISTRIBUTION OF NON-SUGARS IN THE ARI COUPLED LOOP MOLASSES DESUGARIZATION SYSTEM

EH1008 Biomolecules. Inorganic & Organic Chemistry. Water. Lecture 2: Inorganic and organic chemistry.

S. Ananthacumaraswamy and L. S. K. Hettiarachchi (Tea Research Institute of Sri Lanka, Talawakelle, Sri Lanka)

Discuss the importance of healthy soils Soil properties, physical, chemical and biological that one can manage for soil health How organics play a

PPBio Australasia Metadata SOIL PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS

Pushkarov Institute of Soil Science and Agroecology, Shosse Bankia 7, Sofia 1080, Bulgaria, Fax (359) (2)

THE EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, ACIDIC RAINS, ALUMINIUM CONTAINING PACKAGING ON THE GROWTH OF WHEAT

Use of A Multi-ionic Extractant to Determine Available P, K, Na, Ca, and Mg in Acid Soils of Sri Lanka

Use of Soil and Tissue Testing for Sustainable Crop Nutrient Programs

Plants, soil, and nutrients. Created in partnership with Alex Lindsey, Ph.D., The Ohio State University

ANIMAL, PLANT & SOIL SCIENCE D3-6 CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCES OF PHOSPHORUS AND POTASSIUM

CATION STUDIES ON A TYPICAL SOIL OF THE NATAL MIDLANDS

FERTIGATION 24 FERTIGATION WITH DRIPPERS

Common Salt Ions. Salinity. Soil permeability reflects sodicity problems from sodium concentrations 1/15/2008

Assessment of Secondary and Micro Nutrient Status under Long-Term Fertilizer Experiment on Vertisol

TYPE: ORGANIC NUTRIENTS CODE: BF4 - GRANULE (JAIVIZYME)

Nutrients & Diagnosing Nutrient Needs. Carrie Laboski Dept. of Soil Science UW-Madison

Fertilization Programming

Soil Testing and Interpretation

Potassium improves the assimilation of CO 2 (photosynthesis) and the relocation of the formed products.

Correction of Zinc Deficiency in Avocado

Mineral Nutrition. Many nutrient cations are held on and released from negatively charged soil particles. Cation Exchange Capacity.

Advanced ph management

Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level. Published

RELIABILITY OF SOIL AND PLANT ANALYSES FOR MAKING NUTRIENT RECOMMENDATIONS

Preventing, diagnosing and understanding nutrient deficiencies in plants

The six elements that make up 99.9% of all living things include

USERS GUIDE for the. report

The Mikhail System of Sustainable Soil Management

Determination of available nutrients in soil using the Agilent 4200 MP-AES

Investigating the probable cause of crop decline in central Oahu A.P. Pant, N.V. Hue, J. Uyeda, J. Sugano, and T. Radovich

MEASURE AND MANAGE. Soiless Mixes, Testing and Nutrition Guidelines

Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management. Hailin Zhang. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

COMPLETION REPORT. 2. Location : AICRP WM Dept. of Agronomy Agricultural College & Research Institute Madurai Tamil Nadu, India

THE EFFECT OF SALT AND OSMOTIC STRESS ON THE RETENTION OF POTASSIUM BY EXCISED BARLEY AND BEAN ROOTS

Acad. M. Popov Institute of Plant Physiology, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 21, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria 2

EVALUATION OF THE REACTION OF TWO CONTRASTING BARLEY (HORDEUM VULGARE L.) CULTIVARS IN RESPONSE TO OSMOTIC STRESS WITH PEG 6000

years later the time has come to decide what vegetation should be planted. Because the City of Berkeley

Effect of organics and inorganic phosphorus on inorganic P-fractions in soil of soy bean (Glycine max L.) crop

POTASSIUM 4Growth Komodo and Komodo Pro by Rick Vetanovetz PhD

1101 S Winchester Blvd., Ste. G 173 San Jose, CA (408) (408) fax Page 1 of 2

Analysis. Methods of. of Soils, Plants, Waters, Fertilisers & Organic Manures. Edited by HLS Tandon

Chapter 05 Mineral Nutrition

Soil Testing Options in High Tunnels. Bruce Hoskins University of Maine anlab.umesci.maine.edu

Plant, Soil, and Nutrients

Soil Program Recommendation

SAFE HANDS NEET - IB - PT4 Date : 25/12/2017 TEST ID: 4 Time : 01:30:00 Marks : th PCB

Markus Braaten. Elston D. Solberg. Director of Agri-Knowledge Agri-Trend. US Director of Agri-Knowledge Agri-Trend USA

EFFECTS OF BORON STARVATION ON LIGNIN CONTENT AND MINERAL COMPOSITION OF N 2 -FIXING SOYBEAN PLANTS (GLYCINE MAX L. MERR). G. Zehirov*, G.

The importance of potassium to tree crops and nuts especially pistachio. Dr Jianlu Zhang

Effects of Bicarbonate and High ph Conditions on Zinc and Other Nutrients Absorption in Rice

Cranberry Nutrition: An A Z Guide. Joan R. Davenport Soil Scientist Washington State University

Rec Alkaline Presentation. Jarmo Pudas, Development Director

Fixation of P. Figure 4. Illustration of the interaction between the available and unavailable pools of phosphorous in the soil.

BIOLOGICAL MOLECULES REVIEW-UNIT 1 1. The factor being tested in an experiment is the A. data. B. variable. C. conclusion. D. observation. 2.

Potash Phosphate Nitrogen

APPLICABILITY OF Cu AND Zn HYDROXOSALTS AS SOURCES OF MICROELEMENTS FOR GROWING LETTUCE (Lactuca sativa L.). I. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH

Supplying Nutrients to Crops

The effect of humic acid and fulvic acid on adsorption-desorption behavior of copper and zinc in the yellow soil

Greenhouse Horticulture

SOIL TESTS & INTERPRETATION

Chapter 2 Part 3: Organic and Inorganic Compounds

Kader MAL, S. (2010 March) Cytosolic calcium and ph signaling in plants under salinity stress. Plant Signal Behav. 5(3):

S1AN: Same as test S1A with carryover Nitrogen as Nitrate With Recommendations: $13.20 Without Recommendations: $11.50

METROPOLITAN GOLF COURSE CONSULTANT REPORT FOR NOVEMBER 2009

Transcription:

BULG. J. PLANT PHYSIOL., 2002, 28(3 4), 35 45 35 CATION-EXCHANGE CHARACTERISTICS OF WHEAT, BARLEY AND PEA DEPENDING ON THE OSMOTIC PRESSURE IN NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS OF LOW ph Antoaneta Arsova * N. Pushkarov Institute of Soil Science, 7 Shosse Bankya str., Sofia 1080, Bulgaria Received July 30, 2002 Summary. In water cultures experiment with wheat, barley and pea we studied the influence of the osmotic pressure in nutrient solutions of low ph (ph 4.5) on the content of,, and ions in water-soluble and exchangeadsorbed states and cation-exchange capacity of the above ground mass. The results obtained showed that the osmotic pressure is determinant for the changes in the cation content and also has a significant effect on the cationexchange properties of plant tissues. The increase of the osmotic pressure in the range of 0 0.52 MPa decreased ions and enhanced the bases content and the cation-exchange capacity of the above ground mass. The low ph of the nutrient solutions increased the share of the strongly acidic compounds in the tissues, which depended on the acidic sensitivity or tolerance of the plants. Key words: barley, cation-exchange characteristics, nutrient solution, osmotic pressure, pea, ph, wheat Introduction The osmotic pressure of the nutrient substrate unites the two basic factors salt concentration and water state that determine the normal level of the biochemical and physiological processes in plants and form the plant production (Hewith, 1966; Fedorov and Vahmistrov, 1980; Lutge and Higinbottom, 1984; Lazarov et al., 2001). In previous studies we established an osmotic pressure about 0.1MPa, for which maximum production was obtained from cereals and leguminous plants grown on * Corresponding author, e-mail: union_orto@hotmail.com

36 A. Arsova nutrient solutions at ph 5.5 and 4.5 (Ganev and Arsova, 1991; Arsova, 2001). This fact expanded the range of the osmotic optimum to a higher acidity of the nutrient solution, at which the balanced ion-exchange of the roots was disturbed and demonstrated that the osmotic pressure was determinant for the biomass formation from both the acidic sensitive and tolerant plants. The mineral nutrition of plants is connected with ion-exchange processes of roots and depends on the ph of the nutrient medium. The diverse ionic groups of the biochemical structures in plant tissues participate in the ion exchange with nutrient substrate depending on its acidity and show a behavior of strongly acidic structures (polyuronic and nucleic acids) and weakly acidic structures (proteins). The specific character of ionization of the different compounds in plant tissues is expressed in the relative share of the strongly and weakly acidic positions in the cation-exchange capacity of the tissues. The acidic sensitivity of the plants is connected with the increase of the capacity of strongly acidic structures, while its decrease determines the plant tolerance (Ganev and Kalichkova, 1992). We were interested in studying the physico-chemical properties of plant tissues as affected by the osmotic pressure in nutrient solutions of low ph. The experiment carried out with cereals and leguminous plants grown on nutrient solutions at ph 4.5 (Arsova, 2001) was used to continue the investigations in this aspect. The aim of the present work was to study the effect of increasing osmotic pressure in nutrient solutions of low ph on the cation content and cation-exchange capacity of the above ground mass from wheat, barley and pea. Material and methods Plant material was taken from the water cultures experiment carried out according to the following scheme. After germination seeds of wheat, pea and barley were wrapped up by ten in rolls of filter paper in three replications and put into Erlenmaeyer flasks with distilled water for 2 3 days. The water was replaced by 200cm 3 of nutrient solutions with different osmotic pressure and the only one variant was with distilled water. ph of the solutions was adjusted by a potentiometer to ph 4.5. The nutrient solutions had the following chemical composition and osmotic pressure: Nutrient salts I solution II solution III solution mequ.l 1 KNO 3 4.0 12.0 60.0 Ca(NO 3 ) 2 2.0 6.0 30.0 KH 2 PO 4 1.0 3.0 15.0 MgSO 4 1.0 3.0 15.0 P, MPa 0.03 0.1 0.52

Cation-exchange characteristics of wheat, barley and pea depending on the osmotic... 37 The solutions were a modification for the balanced solution of Hogland-Arnon (Hewith, 1966). The different osmotic pressure was achieved on the basis of a proportional increase in salt concentration, while the ionic ratios in the nutrient solutions were retained. The nitrogen was in the NO 3 form and the selected range of varying the osmotic pressure included the hypoosmotic and hyperosmotic conditions (0.0 0.52 MPa). For 20 days the nutrient solutions were replaced daily and adjusted by potentiometer to ph 4.5. The above ground mass was dried and ground. The content of,, Mg 2 and ions and the cation-exchange capacity of the strongly acidic (CEC SA ) and weakly acidic (CEC A ) ion-exchange structures were determined by using the following analytical methods. Plant sample of 1g was saturated with 3 M glycerol, which was the most appropriate dissolving agent for mineral and organic salts and acids in tissues and extracted completely the cations in water-soluble state. In the filtrate ions were determined by titration with 0.04 N NaOH. In aliquot parts of this filtrate and ions were determined complexometrically by titration with 0.02 N EDTA and ions by flame spectrophotometry method. The cations in exchange-adsorbed state were desorbed from the same plant sample with 0.5 N NaCl. In aliquot parts of the filtrate and ions were determined by titration with 0.01N EDTA and ions spectrophotometrically. After subsequent saturation of the sample with mixed buffer solution of 0.5 N Na-acetate and 0.2 N Na-maleinate (ph 8.2) the exchange-adsorbed ions were determined in the filtrate acidimetrically by titration with 0.04 N NaOH (Ganev and Arsova, 1982). The different biochemical compounds in plant tissues react in the cation exchange as strongly acidic and weakly acidic structures depending on the degree of ionization of their ions. The capacity values of the ion-exchange structures in plant tissues were determined on the principle of adsorption of calcium indicator ions on the strongly acidic charges (ionic groups of polyuronic, nucleic acids, etc.) and of the hydrogen indicator ions on the weakly acidic charges (proteins). For this purpose the plant sample of 1g was boiled in 100 ml 0.5 N NaCl to set all acidic positions in Na-form. After that the sample was saturated with mixed buffer solution of 0.2 N calcium acetate and 0.2 N calcium-lactate (ph 5.0). and ions were desorbed with mixed buffer solution of 0.4N sodium acetate and 0.2 N sodium maleinate (ph 8.2). In the filtrate ions were determined acidimetrically by titration with 0.02 N NaOH and ions complexometrically by titration with 0.01 N EDTA. The capacity values of the weakly acidic and strongly acidic ion-exchange structures were calculated on the base of the and content, respectively (Ganev and Arsova, 1989). Results and discussion The influence of the osmotic pressure of the solutions on plant productivity is a summary effect from its impact upon the physico-chemical parameters.

38 A. Arsova Table 1 presents the content of cations in water-soluble and exchange-adsorbed state in the above ground mass of wheat, pea and barley depending on the osmotic pressure in nutrient solutions at ph 4.5. Table 1. Content of cations in water-soluble and exchange-adsorbed state in the tissues of wheat, pea and barley depending on the osmotic pressure (P, MPa) in nutrient solutions of ph 4.5 (Values are given as mean average from three replications) Σ CEC P, MPa in water-soluble state in exchange-adsorbed state cmol +.kg 1 cmol +.kg 1 Wheat 0.00 58.4 24.0 2.1 85.9 170.4 12.2 21.0 3.1 1.5 37.8 0.03 45.2 38.0 2.5 146.3 205.0 10.4 23.5 3.3 3.4 40.6 0.10 41.2 41.0 2.6 172.3 257.1 9.8 28.5 3.5 3.8 45.6 0.52 40.3 52.0 3.0 240.3 335.6 8.6 31.6 3.7 4.4 48.3 Pea 0.00 62.6 38.5 1.5 50.6 153.2 16.8 28.5 1.8 1.0 48.1 0.03 58.4 45.8 1.6 115.1 220.9 13.6 32.8 1.8 1.4 49.6 0.10 56.3 50.6 1.8 140.3 249.0 10.5 38.9 1.9 1.6 52.9 0.52 52.5 54.6 2.0 230.2 339.3 8.6 42.3 2.3 2.1 55.3 Barley 0.00 52.8 42.0 2.2 76.7 173.7 16.0 22.3 1.8 1.5 41.6 0.03 45.6 46.4 2.5 115.1 245.6 14.6 25.4 2.1 1.9 44.0 0.10 41.2 48.5 2.7 188.5 280.9 13.8 28.9 2.6 2.7 48.0 0.52 39.6 51.5 3.1 232.5 326.7 12.6 30.9 2.9 3.9 50.3 LSD 2.15 2.40 0.22 3.27 1.20 0.75 0.35 0.27 5% 1.31 1.65 0.12 2.02 0.87 0.49 0.25 0.15 The amount of the hydrogen ions in water-soluble state for the three plants decreases with the rise of the osmotic pressure. ions are released from the carboxyl groups of organic acids (RCOOH). This means that their quantity is diminished as well. At the same time the electrolytic content (S - summary content of the cations in water-soluble state) increases to a much higher extent, mainly regarding the potassium ions. It could be noticed that the ionic ratios in the electrolytic phase are changed significantly with the rise of osmotic pressure of the solutions. For instance, the ratio between the monovalent ions of potassium and hydrogen increases as follows: / (wheat) = 1.47 (0.0 MPa); 3.23 (0.03 MPa); 4.18 (0.1 MPa); 5.96 (0.52 MPa); / (barley) = 1.45 (0.0 MPa); 2.52 (0.03 MPa); 4.57 (0.1 MPa); 5.87 (0.52 MPa); / (pea) = 0.80 (0.0 MPa); 1.97 (0.03 MPa); 2.50 (0.1 MPa); 4.40 (0.52 MPa).

Cation-exchange characteristics of wheat, barley and pea depending on the osmotic... 39 The smallest changes were observed for the pea which confirms the fact that leguminous crops possess a greater capability for regulating the balance of their mineral composition. The rise of the salt concentration in liquid phase of plant tissues with the increase of the solutions osmotic pressure is a result of the selective mechanisms of ion uptake (Fedorov and Vahmistrov, 1980). Thus, the higher osmotic pressure of the solution activates the neutralization with basic cations of the organic acids. It is very probable that this process could cause an increase of the internal osmotic pressure in the phloem sap of plant tissues, which varies within 1 to 3 MPa according to published data (Lutge and Higinbottom, 1984). The adsorption phase of the tissues is comparatively more protected than the liquid one from the impact of external factors. Because of that the changes in the content of the exchange-adsorbed cations for the three plant species are expressed more weakly. The same trends of changes caused by the increasing osmotic pressure are observed (Table 1). Namely, the concentration of hydrogen ions diminishes and that of the basic cations increases. The total content of the exchange-adsorbed cations expresses the cation-exchange capacity of the above ground mass (CEC). Most probably, the high capacity value under osmotic stress conditions is due to the formation of new ion-exchange structures and, respectively, to the availability of new adsorption sites. The above ground mass of pea features had the highest capacity (CEC pea 48.1 55.3 cmol +.kg 1 ) for all osmotic levels, which is characteristic for the leguminous crops. We found out analogous changes in the content of cations in water-soluble and exchange-adsorbed state in the tissues of wheat, pea and barley in nutrient solutions of ph 5.5 (Ganev and Asrsova, 1991), which confirms the dominant role of the osmotic pressure in this case. Fig. 1, 2 and 3 show the content of cations in liquid and absorption phases in the tissues of wheat, pea and barley, expressed, respectively, as percentages of the electrolytic content and cation-exchange capacity depending on the osmotic pressure. The osmotic pressure does not influence the character of the relative distribution of cations, which are arranged in the following orders: Liquid phase: % > % > % >> % Adsorption phase: % > % > % > % Table 2 shows the capacity values of the strongly acidic (CEC SA ) and weakly acidic (CEC A ) structures and the cation-exchange capacity (CEC SA+A ) of the above ground mass of wheat, pea and barley depending on the osmotic pressure of the nutrient solutions of ph 4.5. The rising osmotic pressure increases the strongly acidic positions and diminishes the weakly acidic positions. These changes are expressed most significantly for the pea where the osmotic stress (P 0.52 MPa) causes a rise of CEC SA with 26% compared to the variant with distilled water. The low ph of the nutrient solution results in a larger share of the strongly acidic positions. Thus, for all three plant species the capacity of the strongly acidic structures is higher than the capacity of the weakly

40 A. Arsova Liquid phase Adsorption phase 5 1 3 P = 0.0 MPa 56% 32% 19% P = 0.03 MPa 26% 6 16% 5 66% 17% 16% P = 0.1 MPa 62% 22% 12% 15% P = 0.52 MPa 9% 1 72% 65% Fig.1. Relative distribution of cations in wheat depending on the osmotic pressure in nutrient solutions of ph 4.5

Cation-exchange characteristics of wheat, barley and pea depending on the osmotic... 41 Liquid phase Adsorption phase 33% 4 P = 0.0 MPa 2% 35% 25% 59% 26% P = 0.03 MPa 3% 27% 52% 2 66% 23% P = 0.1 MPa 3% 20% 56% 20% 73% 15% 16% P = 0.52 MPa 16% 65% 76% Fig. 2. Relative distribution of cations in pea depending on the osmotic pressure in nutrient solutions of ph 4.5

42 A. Arsova Liquid phase Adsorption phase 45% 30% P = 0.0 MPa 3 2 5 22% P = 0.03 MPa 5% 33% 55% 22% 5 15% 17% P = 0.1 MPa 5% 6% 29% 67% 60% P = 0.52 MPa 12% 16% 6% 25% 7 Fig. 3. Relative distribution of cations in barley depending on the osmotic pressure in nutrient solutions of ph 4.5 6

Cation-exchange characteristics of wheat, barley and pea depending on the osmotic... 43 Table 2. Capacity of strongly acidic (CEC SA ) and weakly acidic (CEC A ) structures and cation exchange capacity (CEC SA+A ) of the above ground mass of wheat, pea and barley depending on the osmotic pressure (P, MPa) in nutrient solutions of ph 4.5 (Values are given as mean average from three replications) P, MPa CEC SA CEC A CEC SA+A CEC SA CEC A cmol +.kg 1 in % of CEC SA+A Wheat 0.0 19.5 19.0 38.5 50.6 49.3 0.03 20.5 18.6 39.1 52.4 47.5 0.10 27.7 17.1 44.8 61.8 38.1 0.52 31.0 16.5 47.5 65.2 34.7 Pea 0.0 29.4 18.6 48.0 61.2 38.7 0.03 37.2 12.0 49.2 74.6 24.4 0.10 44.4 8.0 52.4 84.7 15.3 0.52 47.8 7.0 54.8 87.2 12.7 Barley 0.0 22.6 19.4 42.0 53.8 46.1 0.03 24.2 19.0 43.2 56.0 43.9 0.10 29.0 18.5 47.5 61.0 38.9 0.52 34.4 15.2 49.6 69.3 30.6 LSD 1.30 0.45 5 % 0.95 0.21 acidic structures (CEC SA > CEC A ). The difference between the capacity values of the two types of acidic structures is greatest under condition of osmotic stress, where CEC SA attains maximal values. The increase of the strongly acidic capacity value provides an additional adsorption of cations under high salt concentration and low ph of the solution, which is probably an adaptive reaction of the plants to the complex impact of both the osmotic and acidic factor in the nutrient medium. Pea, which is an acidic sensitive plant, is characterized by the largest share of strongly acidic positions in the cation-exchange capacity, which varies within the range from 61.2% to 87.2% depending on the osmotic pressure. This share is lowest for the wheat, which is tolerant to high acidity conditions and varies between 50.6% and 65.2% of the total capacity of the above ground mass. The behavior of some biochemical compounds as strongly acidic structures is determining for the mineral nutrition of plants in acid medium. The increase of the cationexchange capacity of the above ground mass also is a consequence of the higher capacity of the strongly acidic structures at higher osmotic pressure of solutions. This supports the hypothesis of providing new adsorption sites for cation exchange under these

44 A. Arsova conditions. Maximal values of CEC SA+A (48.0 54.8 cmol +.kg 1 ) are observed for pea, which confirms the fact that leguminous crops are characterized by high cation-exchange ability. The close values of the capacity CEC SA+A to those which are defined as a sum of the exchange-adsorbed cations (CEC) in Table 1 is a logical consequence of the character of the applied analytical methods. Conclusion The increase of the osmotic pressure in nutrient solutions of ph 4.5 leads to the following changes in the cation-exchange characteristics of the tissues of wheat, barley and pea: decrease in ions content; increase in bases content; increase in the share of strongly acidic structures; increase in the cation-exchange capacity. Under conditions of osmotic stress (P 0.52 MPa) a maximal cation-exchange capacity of the above ground mass is obtained, which provides an additional adsorption of cations and improves the mineral nutrition at low ph of the nutrient solutions. The low ph of the nutrient solutions results in domination of the strongly acidic structures in the whole range of variation of the osmotic pressure, which is determined by the acidic sensitivity of plants and is best observed for pea. References Arsova, A., 2001. Effect of nutrient solution s osmotic pressure on cereals and leguminous plant production and proton-bicarbonate exchange of roots. Proceeding of II National Conf. Achievements and perspectives of water regime and mineral nutrition of plants in Bulgaria, Sofia, 9 Oct., 2001, 74 78 (In Bulg.). Fedorov, A., D. Vahmistrov, 1980. Effect of ratios between nutrients on mineral composition in plants in relation to their selected ability. Agrochemistry, 8, 93 101 (In Russ.). Ganev, S. A. Arsova, 1982. Method for determining the cations in water soluble and exchange adsorbed state in plant leaves. Forestry, 6, 8 15 (In Bulg.). Ganev, S., A. Arsova, 1989. Method for determining the weakly acidic and strongly acidic ion-exchangers in plant tissues. Plant Physiol., 15, 72 79 (In Bulg.). Ganev, S., A. Arsova, 1991. Proton and bicarbonate exchange of plant roots depending on the osmotic pressure of nutrient solutions. Plant Physiol., 17, 17 28 (In Bulg.).

Cation-exchange characteristics of wheat, barley and pea depending on the osmotic... 45 Ganev, S. T. Kalichkova, 1992. On the question for cation exchange mechanisms of acidic sensitivity and tolerance of plants. Plant Physiol., 18, 21 29 (In Bulg.). Hewith, E., 1966. Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition. Agricult. Bureaux, U.K. Lazarov, R., A. Mehandjieva, P. Andonova, L. Gradinarski, 2001. Achievements and directions of physiological and biochemical investigations under conditions of irrigation and non-irrigation of the agricultures. Proceeding of II National Conference Achievements and perspectives of water regime and mineral nitrition of plants in Bulgaria, 9.10.2001, Sofia, vol. 2, 7 14. Lutge, Y., N. Higinbottom, 1984. Transport of substances in plants. Kolos, Moscow (In Russ.).